Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 80891

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : OC01 - OC04 Full Version

Laboratory and Imaging Profile of Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Record Based Retrospective Study


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61154.17780
PR Manjunath, Prem Narayanan, Praveen V Pavithran, Nisha Bhavani, Harish Kumar, Vasantha Nair, V Usha Menon, Nithya Abraham

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences (Presently Affiliated with Ramaiah Medical College), Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India. 3. Professor, Department of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India. 4. Professor, Department of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India. 6. Professor, Department of Endocrinology and Podiatry, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India. 7. Clinical Professor, Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India. 8. Assistant Professor, Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
PR Manjunath,
Assistant Professor, Department of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences (Presently Affiliated with Ramaiah Medical College), Bangalore-560054, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: dr.manjunathpr@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Primary Hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is an uncommonly diagnosed symptomatic disease that occurs in India. Unlike Western countries, where the disease is asymptomatic, various manifestations occur in India that are skeletal, muscular, and renal. Studies on PHPT from developing countries like India have shown that symptomatic PHPT is still common compared to developed countries. Data on PHPT from Kerala (a state with health indices comparable to the Western world) are lacking.

Aim: To compare the preoperative and postoperative calcium and Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) levels among the participants.

Materials and Methods: A record-based retrospective study was conducted at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, in the Department of Endocrinology. All 116 patients who had PHPT from January 2013 to December 2019 were included in the study. The data available in the hospital records were analysed for various laboratory values and imaging diagnoses. The preoperative and postoperative calcium and PTH levels were compared. Data were analysed by paired sample t-test (Wilcoxon sign-rank test). The data analysis was done using coGuide.

Results: The mean age was 53.42±14.89 years in the study population. Among the 116 subjects, 46 (39.66%) were males and 70 (60.34%) were females; 83 (71.55%) had the symptomatic disease. The majority, 80 (68.97%) participants underwent single parathyroidectomy. The difference between preoperative and postoperative calcium and PTH was statistically significant (p-value <0.001).

Conclusion: PHPT largely occurs in the fifth decade of life, and the majority were symptomatic. Females were more affected compared to males in the present study. Preoperative imaging is recommended in routine practice.

Keywords

Adenoma, Calcium, Hyperplasia, Parathormone level

PHPT is a condition characterised by the autonomous production of PTH, leading to the development of hypercalcaemia. The classical features of PHPT were described by Albright F et al., about eight decades ago (1). PHPT is one of the most common endocrine disorders in developed countries (2). The prevalence of PHPT varies among different regions of the world. In developing countries like India, PHPT remains underdiagnosed, and patients often have overt symptoms involving the skeletal, muscular, and renal systems by the time they are diagnosed (3),(4),(5),(6).

In contrast to developing countries, the disease manifests as asymptomatic in most developed countries (7). The reason for the varied geographic presentation of the disease remains unclear. One factor for early recognition of asymptomatic or early PHPT in developed countries is better biochemical screening (8). Vitamin D deficiency may lead to severe forms of PHPT. This severity can be further aggravated by a predominantly vegetarian diet, which acts as an important risk factor for vitamin D deficiency (9). A study was conducted by Misgar RA et al., among PHPT patients in the Kashmir Valley, which showed that the most common presenting features were nephrolithiasis, bone pain, abdominal pain, constipation, and myopathy (10). Another study from western India showed that clinical manifestations in Indian patients were primarily renal and skeletal (5). However, there is a lack of evidence on the clinical and imaging profile of PHPT patients in South India.

Hence, this study was planned to describe the laboratory and imaging profiles of patients with PHPT in Kerala and to compare pre- and post-operative hormonal levels in these patients.

Material and Methods

The present study was a record-based retrospective study conducted at the Department of Endocrinology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India. Retrospective analysis of data of all patients with biochemically confirmed PHPT between January 2013 and December 2019 was analysed from May 2022 to November 2022, from the hospital information system. The Institutional Ethics Committee approved the study of Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences (IEC Reference number: ECASM-AIMS-2023-041), Cochin, Department of Endocrinology. A consent waiver was obtained as it was a record-based study. However, procedural consent and consent for blood draws were obtained during the treatment in the hospital.

Inclusion criteria: Confirmed cases of PHPT with elevated calcium levels and raised PTH levels above the assay-specific range were included.

Clinical presentation was broadly divided into three forms: mild symptomatic (body ache and joint pain), symptomatic (pancreatitis, renal calculus, fractures), and incidental finding (when evaluated for unrelated complaints).

Exclusion criteria: Patients with secondary/tertiary hyperparath-yroidism, incomplete data, and non-PTH-mediated hypercalcaemia were excluded from the study.

Procedure

A total of 116 patient data was retrieved from the hospital information system in the Department of Endocrinology from the year 2013 to 2019 who underwent Tc MIBI scanning. Details like the age of the patient, symptoms, biochemical parameters, and imaging features were analysed. Calcium levels and PTH levels were measured in all patients. Biochemically confirmed patients with PHPT after ruling out Familial Hypocalciuric Hypercalcaemia (FHH) with urine calcium creatinine ratio were subjected to imaging like ultrasound neck and Technetium 99 m sestamibi (MIBI)- 99 m Tc-methoxy isobutyl isonitrile Tc MIBI scanning. A 15 mCi of 99 m Tc-MIBI is injected intravenously and dynamic and static images of the anterior neck, and mediastinum were obtained at 20 minutes, two hours, and three hours post-injection using a dual head variable angle Gamma camera. Dynamic and static images of the anterior neck and mediastinum were obtained at 20 minutes, two hours, and three hours post-inject using a dual head variable angle Gamma camera. Single-Photon Emission Computerised Tomography (SPECT) scan of the neck was also performed (GE Optima NM/CT 640). Patients who had localised lesions or were suspected lesions on imaging were posted for parathyroid surgery. In those patients with negative imaging, medical management was done in the form of diuretics and calcimimetics; 15 mCi of 99 m Tc-MIBI was injected intravenously. Normal calcium levels were considered when they ranged from 8.6-10.0 (mg/dL), hypercalcaemia was considered when it was serum calcium levels >10 mg/dL, and PTH levels were considered normal between 15.0-65.0 pg/mL (6).

Statistical Analysis

Pre-operative and post-operative laboratory parameters were considered the primary outcome variable: Imagining profile was considered the primary explanatory variable. Descriptive analysis was carried out by mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables, and frequency and proportion for categorical variables. For normally distributed quantitative parameters, the mean values were compared between preoperative and postoperative using paired sample t-test. (Wilcoxon sign-rank test). The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analysed by using coGuide software, V.1.0 (11).

Results

A total of 116 subjects were included in the final analysis. The mean age of the study samples was 53.42±14.89 (range 15 to 79) years where the majority were female with 70 (60.34%). Among the patients with PHPT, 83 (71.55%) participants were symptomatic, and 33 (28.45%) were asymptomatic. Among patients who were symptomatic pancreatitis was seen in 6 (5.17%) patients, renal stones in 40 (34.48%) patients and bony pains in 52 (44.8%) patients. Around nine (7.76%) patients had a palpable neck mass on examination out of which six patients had adenoma, two patients had hyperplasia and one patient had malignancy.

Family history was present in 4 (3.45%) patients out of which two patients were Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia (MEN) suspects, hypertension was seen in 49 (42.24%) patients and type 2 diabetes was present in 33 (28.45%) patients. The most common site of adenoma was right inferior in 44 (37.93%) patients. Out of 116 participants, 11 (9.48%) participants had hyperplasia (Table/Fig 1).

The pre-operative mean calcium levels were 11.76 mg/dL, mean phosphorous levels were 2.51 mg/dL, the mean calcium creatinine ratio was 0.29±0.25 in the study population (Table/Fig 2).

For localisation of the lesion, patients underwent imaging like an ultrasound of the neck, Tc sestamibi. Around 76 patients had data on ultrasound neck, 51 (43.97%) patients had a single adenoma, 2 (1.72%) patients had two adenomas, and 1 (0.86%) patient had hyperplasia. Among the people with MIBI, 107 (92.24%) participants had adenomas, 4 (3.45%) participants had two adenomas, and one (0.86%) participant had hyperplasia. Once the lesion was localised, patient underwent parathyroidectomy. Single gland parathyroidectomy was done in 80 patients (68.97%), followed by hemithyroidectomy in 10 patients (8.62%) who had associated thyroid nodules, two gland excision or parathyroidectomy was done in four patients (3.45%), two patients (1.72%) underwent subtotal thyroidectomy, and one patient (0.86%) had total parathyroidectomy and 17 patients (14.66%) did not undergo parathyroidectomy out of which 12 patients underwent medical management, remaining five patients wanted to get operated locally for social reasons (Table/Fig 3). The sensitivity and comparison between imaging modalities could not be assessed because not all patients had both investigations done as this is a retrospective data analysis. Surgical exploration was done in four patients out of which one patient was Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia (MEN) suspect, one patient had hyperparathyroidism jaw tumor syndrome (HRPT2), genetically proven, and the other two patients had hyperplasia in histopathology.

The post-operative mean PTH levels were 96.05 pg/mL; the mean calcium levels were 9.53 mg/dL in the study group. Histopathology of the patients who underwent surgery had benign adenoma in 75 (64.66%) patients, 3 (2.59%) patients had malignancy, 19 (16.37%) patients had atypical adenoma/atypical hyperplasia (Table/Fig 4).

Genetic studies were done on two patients, one patient was a young male who presented with a jaw tumour and hypercalcaemia. The other patient was a young female who had persistent hypercalcaemia. Both of these patients had HRPT2 mutation positive which causes hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumour syndrome. Both patients underwent a single parathyroidectomy and followed-up. Among the rest of the patients, five patients were MEN suspects (MEN1/4) but genetic studies were not done on these patients.

Among the study population, the difference between pre-operative and post-operative calcium and PTH was statistically significant (p-value <0.001) (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

This study was conducted to assess the laboratory and imaging profile of patients with PHPT. The majority were females in the present study. PHPT was symptomatic in 71.55% of the participants. The pre-operative calcium levels among the participants were 11.76±1.48, and PTH was 626.73±687.05. The USG neck showed 43.97% had a single adenoma, and MIBI showed 92.24% had an adenoma among the participants.

In this current study, the mean age of the participants was 53.42 years, which was similar to the findings of the study by Misgar RA et al., (10). Few other studies have shown that the mean age was forty years (4),(5),(6),(12). Thus, the current study shows a shift in the age of PHPT patients. Studies in Western countries, however, show the presentation in the fifth decade of life (13),(14). This shift in age among the Indian population may be caused due to the associated vitamin D deficiency (3),(12). The preoperative calcium levels among the study participants were 11.76±1.48 mg/dL. This was similar to most of the Indian studies (3),(4),(5),(12). The mean PTH was 626.73, which is similar to other studies (3),(5),(6),(12).

The preoperative diagnosis, location of the parathyroid gland, and tumour size can contribute important information during the surgery (15). Preoperative imaging ensures the availability of this information and also reduces the need for repeat surgery. The available imaging for parathyroid glands includes USG neck and Tc99 sestamibi scan. Histopathological examination can be done postoperatively to confirm the diagnosis. In this current study, USG neck showed 43.97% had a single adenoma, and MIBI showed 92.24% had an adenoma among the participants. Misgar RA et al., in their study observed that a single adenoma was seen in 88.46%, double adenomas in 8.57%, and more than two gland involvement in 4.28%, at the time of surgery (10). In their study, all patients underwent USG neck and Tc-99 m sestamibi scan. They observed the sensitivity of the Tc-99 m sestamibi scan (89.8%) was greater than USG (95.3%) for localising adenoma. As the authors took those patients who underwent Tc MIBI for hypercalcaemia patients and analysed them, they could not assess the superiority of imaging between Ultrasound neck and TC MIBI.

In the present study, histopathological examination revealed that 64.66% of the study participants had benign lesions in the parathyroid gland. Single parathyroidectomy was performed for 68.97% of the participants. Misgar RA et al., in their study observed that on Histopathological Examination (HPE), adenoma was found in 94.44% and hyperplasia in 3.79%, there was no case of parathyroid carcinoma (10).

The post-operative calcium and PTH levels were compared to assess the effect of surgery. The difference between pre-operative and post-operative calcium and PTH was statistically significant. This indicates that the surgery has a clinical impact on calcium and PTH levels. Comparative evaluation of previously published studies has been done in (Table/Fig 6) (3),(10),(16).

Limitation(s)

The strength of this study was that pre-operative and post-operative comparisons were made for the study participants. The limitation was the study’s retrospective nature, which limits the chance for clinical assessment of the patient.

Conclusion

The present study findings reveal that parathyroidectomy has a significant impact on serum calcium and PTH levels. There was a shift in the mean age of occurrence of PHPT among the Indian population. The presentation is symptomatic and occurs commonly in the fifth decade of life. Preoperative imaging is recommended in routine practice to decide on the type of surgery needed and minimise the need for repeat surgery. A long-term prospective study involving a large sample size is recommended in the future.

References

1.
Albright F, Aub JC, Bauer W. Hyperparathyroidism: A common and polymorphic condition as illustrated by seventeen proved cases from one clinic. J Am Med Assoc. 1934;102(16):1276-87. [crossref]
2.
Ruda JM, Hollenbeak CS, Stack BC. A systematic review of the diagnosis and treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism from 1995 to 2003. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg. 2005;132(3):359-72. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Mishra SK, Agarwal G, Kar DK, Gupta SK, Mithal A, Rastad J. Unique clinical characteristics of primary hyperparathyroidism in India. Br J Surg. 2001;88(5):708-14. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Bhansali A, Masoodi SR, Reddy KS, Behera A, das Radotra B, Mittal B, et al. Primary hyperparathyroidism in north India: A description of 52 cases. Ann Saudi Med. 2005;25(1):29-35. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Gopal RA, Acharya SV, Bandgar T, Menon PS, Dalvi AN, Shah N. Clinical profile of primary hyperparathyroidism from western India: A single center experience. J Postgrad Med. 2010;56(2):79-84. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Priya G, Jyotsna VP, Gupta N, Chumber S, Bal CS, Karak AK, et al. Clinical and laboratory profile of primary hyperparathyroidism in India. Postgrad Med J. 2008;84(987):34-39. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Silverberg SJ, Shane E, Jacobs TP, Siris E, Bilezikian JP. A 10-year prospective study of primary hyperparathyroidism with or without parathyroid surgery. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(17):1249-55. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Wermers RA, Khosla S, Atkinson EJ, Hodgson SF, O’Fallon WM, Melton. The rise and fall of primary hyperparathyroidism: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965-1992. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:433-40. Doi: 10.7326/0003- 4819-126-6-199703150-00003. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Lamberg-Allardt C, Kärkkäinen M, Seppänen R, Biström H. Low serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D concentration and secondary hyperparathyroidism in middle-aged white strict vegetarians. Am J Clin Nutr. 1993;58(5):684-89. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Misgar RA, Dar PM, Masoodi SR, Ahmad M, Wani KA, Wani AI, et al. Clinical and laboratory profile of primary hyperparathyroidism in Kashmir Valley: A single-center experience. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2016;20(5):696-701. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
BDSS Corp. Released 2020. coGuide Statistics Software, Version 1.0.3. Bangalore, India: BDSS Corp. Available from: https://www.coguide.in. [Last accessed on 2023 Feb 11].
12.
Harinarayan CV, Gupta N, Kochupillai N. Vitamin D status in primary hyperparathyroidism in India. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1995;43(3):351-58. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Rao DS, Wilson RJ, Kleerekoper M, Parfitt AM. Lack of biochemical progression or continuation of accelerated bone loss in mild asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: Evidence for biphasic disease course. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;67(6):1294-98. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Parfitt AM, Rao DS, Kleerekoper M. Asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism discovered by multichannel biochemical screening: Clinical course and considerations bearing on the need for surgical intervention. J Bone Miner Res. 1991;6(Suppl. 2):S97-101. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Lundstroem AK, Trolle W, Soerensen CH, Myschetzky PS. Preoperative localization of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands with 4D-CT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(5):1253-59. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Amir A, Sands NB, Tamilia M, Hier MP, Black MJ, Payne RJ. Preoperative serum calcium levels as an indicator of post thyroidectomy hypocalcaemia. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;39(6):654-658.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61154.17780

Date of Submission: Nov 02, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 06, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Apr 13, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 12, 2022
• Manual Googling: Mar 07, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Apr 12, 2023 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com