Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 97407

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : LC07 - LC12 Full Version

Effectiveness of Preoperative Education and Music Intervention on Postoperative Outcomes among Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: A Quasi-experimental Study


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60507.17841
Hezil Reema Barboza, MS Moosabba, Fatima D Silva, Amar Sunil Lobo

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Yenepoya Nursing College, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor, Department of General Surgery, Yenepoya Medical College, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, NITTE Usha Institute of Nursing Sciences, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Yenepoya Medical College, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
MS Moosabba,
Professor, Department of General Surgery, Yenepoya Medical College, Mangaluru-575018, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: drmssonkal@yahoo.in; hezilreemabarboza@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The preoperative phase includes various procedures that aim to prepare the patient physically and psychologically to promote postoperative recovery. Preoperative education and music intervention may play an important role in improving the postoperative outcomes.

Aim: To study the effectiveness of preoperative education and music intervention on postoperative outcomes, such as anxiety and pain, and to assess the satisfaction of patients, regarding surgical experience on discharge. Study also aims to initiate early feeding and its effects on postoperative recovery.

Materials and Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted in Surgical Wards of Yenepoya Medical College Hospital, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India, between January 2021. A total of 52 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were selected and divided into intervention and control groups. Two days before the surgery, patients in the intervention group were given preoperative education and were encouraged to listen to preferred music in the evening. Music intervention was given for two days before the surgery and continued in the postoperative phase for three days. Immediately after the music intervention, the anxiety was assessed by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and severity of pain using numerical rating scale. Early feeding was initiated postoperatively and the patients were observed for discomfort and complications. The patients satisfaction was evaluated for their surgical experience on discharge using a patient satisfaction questionnaire. An independent t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the variables between the groups.

Results: The mean age in the intervention group was 43.46±14.89 years and control group 44.07±12.64 years. The majority of subjects in the both groups were males. A reduction in anxiety scores was observed among patients in the intervention group that was statistically significant (p<0.05) at preoperative day 1, 2, postoperative day 1, 2 and 3. The mean pain scores decreased from preoperative day 1 to postoperative day 3 in the intervention group than in the control group. In the intervention group, 7.7% of the patients received oral feed within an hour of surgery whereas, 26.9% were in the fourth hour and 26.9% were in the sixth hour of surgery. They did not report discomfort and complications such as nausea and vomiting. In the intervention group, the mean satisfaction was 60.30±5.00, indicating a higher level of satisfaction among patients.

Conclusion: Preoperative education and music intervention reduces the severity of anxiety and pain. Early oral feeding is safer and effective in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. These interventions help in improving the postoperative outcomes and satisfaction with surgical experience.

Keywords

Anxiety, Early feeding, Pain, Perioperative care

Preoperative anxiety is the unpleasant emotional state experienced by patients who are posted for surgery. It can be due to fear of anaesthesia, surgical instrumentation, previous experience of surgery and the strange environment of the operation theatre (1),(2),(3). After major surgery, patients may experience discomfort and anxiety that can adversely affect the postoperative recovery of patients (4). Preoperative anxiety also influences postoperative well-being and recovery (5),(6),(7). The studies suggest that, the psychological preparation of the patient is necessary for a better outcome and early recovery (8),(9). Preoperative education decreases anxiety, increases confidence and minimise the postoperative pain. In addition to this, it reduces the length of hospital stay, anxiety and rate of postoperative complications. Thus, it promotes healing and improves the outcome of surgery (8),(9). A study reported that patients prepared with preoperative education experienced a low levels of postoperative pain, and also preoperative patient information has showed a positive effect on the postoperative pain. It is considered as a valuable addition to the pain management (10). The music intervention also plays an important role in relaxation of mind and body (11). The studies have shown that, instrumental music such as guitar, piano and flute had substantial effects on pain and anxiety (12),(13). The use of natural sounds such as, the waterfall sounds of birds and rain was used in 1984 in the management of anxiety and pain in patients (14). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a program with multimodal interventions for better preoperative and postoperative outcomes in surgical patients. Implementation of this program results in major improvements in patient related outcomes and reduction in hospital cost (2),(3).

Nutritional status is an important aspect for a successful postoperative outcome. Surgical patients are at high risk for malnutrition, which can lead to delayed wound healing and increase the rate of postoperative infections (15). ERAS program strongly recommends starting a liquid diet within 24 hours after surgery (16). El Nakeeb A et al., showed that, 80%-90% of patients tolerated early oral feeding which is started within a day following colorectal resection (16). The lowest level of satisfaction was seen in patients who were not provided with education in the preoperative phase. A higher percentage of satisfaction was seen in the patient-staff relationship and less satisfaction in subarea of fear and concern in the studies conducted in Eretria and the United Kingdom. These studies revealed patient education and preparation for surgery is necessary to reduce the fear and thus, improves the satisfaction (17),(18). In this regard, the authors hypothesised to assess the effectiveness of preoperative education and music intervention on postoperative outcomes in an attempt to improve the patient satisfaction and to initiate early feeding and to study its effects on postoperative recovery. The authors hypothesised that, there will be a significant difference in the pretest and post-test anxiety, pain scores in the intervention and control groups and there will be no significant difference in the early feeding status, satisfaction scores between the intervention and control groups.

Material and Methods

This quasi-experimental study was conducted in Surgical Wards of Yenepoya Medical College Hospital Mangaluru, Karnataka, India, between January 2021. The study protocol has been reviewed by the Institutional Scientific Review Board (SRB) and approved by the expert panel of the Institutional Ethics Committee I (Protocol no. YEC-l/2019/221) which functions following the declaration of Helsinki, national ethical guidelines for biomedical and health research involving human subjects. An informed consent was taken from all the participants before data collection. A participant information sheet was provided and the patients were explained about the study purpose, duration, details of the intervention, voluntary participation/withdrawal, and benefits/harm involved in the present study.

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged between 18-60 years, who underwent surgeries involving organs such as the stomach, pancreas, gall bladder, spleen and bowel were included in the present study. Patients, who hospitalised two days before surgery and were available for 3 to 5 days postoperatively, were included.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with hearing impairment, chronic treatment with analgesics, with a history of surgery, lower segment cesarean section and abdominal hysterectomy were excluded.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated with a 5% level of significance and 10% marginal error using the formula. “Effects of music therapy under general anaesthesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery” is used as a reference article to estimate sample size (19).

Pooled variance α2=222.45, difference in mean scores d=13.3

Z1-α/2=1.96, Z1-β=1.28 α=5% level of significance, β=10% marginal error

n=2(Z1-a/2-Z1-b)2(s2)/ (d2)

Total 52 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were enrolled by non probability purposive sampling technique. 26 patients were enrolled in each intervention and control groups.

Study Procedure

The present study involves interventions to minimise anxiety and improve postoperative outcomes. These include education to the patients and listening to prerecorded music. An educational module was prepared by the investigator for teaching the patients about various aspects of surgical experience (4),(8),(10),(14). The areas covered in the module were preoperative preparation, orientation to the surgical suite, postoperative care and discharge plan. This module was validated by seven subject experts. The patients were explained about preoperative preparation using education materials during the preoperative phase on day 1 for a duration of 20 minutes. It included informed consent, necessary medical investigations that are carried out, skin preparation, bowel preparation, nil per oral status (not to take solids for 6 hours and clear fluids for 2 hours before anaesthesia), hygiene, preoperative medications and transportation to the operating room. It also highlighted the importance of cognitive coping strategies which are useful for relieving anxiety, decreasing fear and achieving relaxation.

Patients were encouraged to listen to the music intervention to achieve these goals. A music gallery was prepared based on an extensive review of the literature (11),(12),(13). The music was validated and approved by a professional music therapist. The music gallery was composed of nature sounds and instrumental collections. The instrumental music such as flute, sitar, jazz and piano were selected. Nature’s music such as sound of birds, forests, waterfalls and the ocean were included in the music gallery. Patients were asked to listen to music during the two days preoperatively and postoperative three days in the evening for 15 minutes using headphones. The demographic proforma consists of age, gender, marital status, type of family and kind of surgery. A music preference questionnaire was used to know about the likes and preferences for music among patients in the intervention group. It consists of ‘do you like to listen to the music?’, ‘Which form of music do you like the most?’, and ‘Which type of music you would like to listen to during your surgical experience?’.

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAITAI): is a self-evaluation questionnaire to determine anxiety which consists of 40 items (20). Each statement in the state scale has four choices numbering 1=not at all, 2=somewhat, 3=moderately so, 4=very much so. Each statement in the trait scale has four choice numbering, 1=almost never, 2=some times, 3=often, 4=almost always respectively. Maximum score is 160 and minimum 40.

Numeric pain rating scale: is used to assess the severity of pain at that moment using a 0-10 scale, with 0 meaning “no pain” and 10 meaning the “worst pain” on a 10 point rating scale (21).

Patient satisfaction questionnaire: which is a 5-point rating scale was prepared by the investigator after reviewing the literature, consisted of domains such as satisfaction with the information received, meeting physical needs, professional relationship, fear and anxiety [17,18]. This scale had 12 statements and each had five choices numbering which is indicated 1=completely dissatisfied, 2=dissatisfied, 3=neutral, 4=satisfied, 5=completely satisfied.

The tools were pretested on 10 study populations based on patient selection criteria. The internal consistency of the STAI (r=0.9), numeric pain scale (r=0.8) and patient satisfaction questionnaire (r=0.8) were assessed by the test-retest method using Cronbach’s α. The study tools were found to be reliable to measure the variables. Anxiety and pain level was assessed immediately upon listening to the music on the preoperative day 1 and 2, postoperative day 1,2,3. Early oral feeding was initiated within 4-6 hours following surgery or as early as possible. The passing of the first flatus has been used as an indication for bowel function and to initiate feeding postoperatively. Along with this, return of bowel sounds was assessed through auscultation and feeding was initiated with the order of the surgeon. Initially, the patients were given sips of water followed by clear fluids, a soft diet and subsequently were changed to a regular diet as tolerated. An observational checklist was used to assess the immediate postoperative complications. The patients were observed for the occurrence of any complications on postoperative days. On the day of discharge patient satisfaction with surgical experience was assessed. Both the intervention and control groups received standard care such as administration of antibiotics and analgesia.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics such as frequency and percentage describe the sociodemographic characteristics of patients. Repeated measure Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the scores of dependent variables by measurement time. An independent t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the variables between the groups. The p-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0.

Results

The mean age in the intervention group was 43.46±14.89 and control group 44.07±12.64. The majority of subjects in the both groups were males. 17 (65.4%) subjects in each group were married with majority in each group belonged to joint family (Table/Fig 1).

In the intervention group, 10 (38.5%) patients were interested to listen to nature sounds and 16 (61.5%) were interested to listen to instrumental music. The line diagram indicates a reduction in estimated marginal means of anxiety from the first preoperative day 1 to postoperative day 3 (Table/Fig 2).

Mauchly’s Test of Sphericity was significant (p-value=0.001) which suggest that, there was significant relationship between every observations within each study groups. This reveals that, there was change in the scores of anxiety at every observation from preoperative to postoperative days. Anxiety scores were observed to be significantly decreasing in intervention group and increasing in control group at every follow-up (Table/Fig 3). There was a significant difference in anxiety scores between the intervention and control groups except on preoperative day 1. Reduction of anxiety score was seen in the intervention group after the intervention hence, it is proved that preoperative education with music intervention is very helpful in reducing anxiety in the intervention group (Table/Fig 4). There was a significant relationship between every observation within each study groups. This reveals the change in the pain scores at every observation from preoperative to postoperative days. Pain scores were observed to be significantly decreasing in intervention group at every follow-up postoperatively (Table/Fig 5). A significant difference in the pain scores between the intervention and control group was found. The mean pain score was lower from preoperative day 2 to postoperative day 3 in the intervention group than in the control group (Table/Fig 6).

In the intervention group, 2 (7.7%) patients received oral feed within an hour of surgery whereas, 7 (26.9%) in the fourth hour and 7 (26.9%) in the sixth hour of surgery. In the control group 6 patients (23.1%) received oral feed within four hours of surgery (Table/Fig 7). There was no discomfort and complications such as nausea, and vomiting were reported among the intervention group but in control group 3 (11.5%) cases had vomiting on the immediate postoperative day. In the intervention group 4 (15.38%) and control group 6 (23.07%) cases had epidural analgesia in the postoperative phase for the pain management. In the intervention group, the mean satisfaction score was 60.30±5.00, which indicates at higher level of satisfaction among patients. The mean satisfaction was 55.53±5.25 in the control group. The satisfaction score were statistically significant when calculated between the groups (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

The aim of perioperative nursing is to identify and manage patients’ anxiety as it has been associated with higher postoperative pain intensity, morbidity and mortality rates (22). Patient education is challenging for the nurses working in surgical wards. Research studies have shown that, preoperative education can improve patient outcomes, recovery and satisfaction with their surgical experience (22),(23). The traditional postoperative analgesia commonly adopts opioid analgesics that involve considerable side effects. Music is an effective intervention to slow down the rate of pain stimulation and it lowers the conduction of painful nerve impulses to achieve relief from pain (24). The studies have shown that, music therapy is more effective for postoperative pain regardless of the time points of application and found a considerable reduction in postoperative pain scores following music therapy (25),(26). The International guidelines for intensive care units recommend music therapy to reduce pain and anxiety (25).

Assessment of nutritional status is an important measure for successful postoperative outcomes. Unfortunately, certain factors such as comorbid conditions and complex surgical procedures can impair the nutritional status. Prolonged fasting before and after surgery may result in complications, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting, delayed wound healing, surgical site infections and increased insulin resistance (28). The guidelines of European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) suggest early oral feeding is the preferred way for better nutritional status. The focus of this guideline is to cover the nutritional aspects of the ERAS concept and to meet the special nutritional needs of patients undergoing major surgery (29). Some of the studies report early intake of oral feed leads to faster bowel function and recovery without increasing the incidence of complications (30),(31). Early postoperative feeding is challenging which can leads to dysmotility, paralytic ileus, respiratory distress and gastrointestinal dysfunction. Traditionally, postoperative oral intake is delayed and patients were kept nil per oral for long hours until clinical signs of the return of bowel function. Current ERAS practice, emphasise immediate postoperative initiation of oral feed as early as possible. Postoperative early oral feeding is a key factor in improving bowel function after surgery and reducing the incidence of paralytic ileus and multiple postoperative complications (32). Comparison of the findings in present study with contrast studies are shown in (Table/Fig 9) (8),(14),(16),(17). The present study supports that, oral intake should be initiated, as soon as, possible after the surgery. The hypotheses were stated as there will be a significant difference in the pretest and post-test anxiety, pain scores in the intervention and control groups. There will be no significant difference in the early feeding status, satisfaction scores between the intervention and control groups. The multimodal interventions such as preoperative patient education, music and early postoperative feeding are intended to improve the recovery of patients after surgery in terms of improved physiological and psychological functions.

Limitation(s)

The limitation of present study is that, the music intervention was not administered during the surgery. In addition to this, a few patients in the postoperative period had epidural analgesia which could interfere with the effects of music on pain intensity. The efforts were not made to study the effects of family support on anxiety and pain intensity during the surgical experience which could be incorporated in future research studies.

Conclusion

Preoperative education and music intervention showed a significant reduction in anxiety and pain. Early feeding is safely tolerated and showed improvement in postoperative outcomes, thus, accepting the hypothesis. Implementation of music intervention in patient care could be made possible with the availability of professional music therapists in every healthcare system as a member of the healthcare team. This is also possible with the enrichment of the curriculum with an added component of therapeutic music and the introduction of short term courses on music therapy for healthcare professionals. The study concludes that, multiple interventions enhance the recovery of patients and improve the satisfaction with surgical experience. Preoperative education and music are effective interventions that could be incorporated into routine practices for optimal perioperative care among patients undergoing open abdominal surgery.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the support rendered by the hospital authority and study participants to conduct the research study.

References

1.
Kindler CH, Harms C, Amsler F, Ihde-Scholl T, Scheidegger D. The visual analogue scale allows effective measurement of preoperative anxiety and detection of patients’ anaesthetic concerns. Anaesthesia & Analgesia. 2000;90(3):706-12. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Jlala HA, Bedforth NM, Hardman JG. Anaesthesiologists’ perception of patients’ anxiety under regional anaesthesia. Local and Regional Anaesthesia. 2010;3:65. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Bheemanna NK, Channaiah SR, Gowda PK, Shanmugham VH, Chanappa NM. Fears and perceptions associated with regional anaesthesia: A study from a tertiary care hospital in South India. Anaesthesia, Essays And Researches. 2017;11(2):483. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
McCoy CC, Englum BR, Keenan JE, Vaslef SN, Shapiro ML, Scarborough JE. Impact of specific postoperative complications on the outcomes of emergency general surgery patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(5):912-19. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Vaughn F, Wichowski H, Bosworth G. Does preoperative anxiety level predict postoperative pain? AORN J. 2007;85(3):589-604. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Munafò MR, Stevenson J. Anxiety and surgical recovery: Reinterpreting the literature. J Psychosom Res. 2001;51(4):589-96. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Ali A, Altun D, Oguz BH, Ilhan M, Demircan F, Koltka K. The effect of preoperative anxiety on postoperative analgesia and anaesthesia recovery in patients undergoing laparascopic cholecystectomy. J Anaesth. 2014;28(2):222-27. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Elkalashy RA, Masry SE. The effect of preoperative educational intervention on preoperative anxiety and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing open cholecystectomy. IOSR J Nurs Health Sci. 2018;7:78-87.
9.
Paripoorani D, Babu V, Poongodi K, Cherian VM. Effectiveness of instructional video on preoperative anxiety of patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Indian J Cont Nsg Edn. 2015;16:36-41.
10.
Gräwe JS, Mirow L, Bouchard R, Lindig M, Hüppe M. Impact of preoperative patient education on postoperative pain in consideration of the individual coping style. Schmerz. 2010;24(6):575-86. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Pittman S, Kridli S. Music intervention and preoperative anxiety: An integrative review. Int Nurs Rev. 2011;58(2):157-63. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Umbrello M, Sorrenti T, Mistraletti G, Formenti P, Chiumello D, Terzoni S. Music therapy reduces stress and anxiety in critically ill patients: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85(8):886-98. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Fu VX, Oomens P, Klimek M, Verhofstad MH, Jeekel J. The effect of perioperative music on medication requirement and hospital length of stay: A meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2020;272(6):961. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Amiri MJ, Sadeghi T, Negahban Bonabi T. The effect of natural sounds on the anxiety of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Perioper Med. 2017;6(1):01-06. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Sandrucci S, Cotogni P, De Zolt Ponte B. Impact of artificial nutrition on postoperative complications. Healthcare (Basel). 2020;8(4):559. Doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040559. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
El Nakeeb A, Fikry A, El Metwally T, Fouda E, Youssef M, Ghazy H, et al. Early oral feeding in patients undergoing elective colonic anastomosis. Int J Surg. 2009;7:206-09. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Andemeskel YM, Elsholz T, Gebreyohannes G, Tesfamariam EH. Patient satisfaction with peri-operative anaesthesia care and associated factors at two National referral hospitals: A cross sectional study in Eritrea. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):01-08. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Caljouw M, Van Beuzekom M, Boer F. Patient’s satisfaction with perioperative care: Development, validation, and application of a questionnaire. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(5):637-44. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Kahloul M, Mhamdi S, Nakhli MS, Sfeyhi AN, Azzaza M, Chaouch A, et al. Effects of music therapy under general anaesthesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Libyan J Med. 2017;12(1):1260886. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; Palo Alto, CA, Ed. Palo Alto: Spielberger. 1983. [crossref]
21.
Kahl C, Cleland JA. Visual analogue scale, numeric pain rating scale and the McGill pain questionnaire: An overview of psychometric properties. Physical Therapy Reviews. 2005;10(2):123-28. [crossref]
22.
Kakar E, Billar RJ, Van Rosmalen J, Klimek M, Takkenberg JJ, Jeekel J. Music intervention to relieve anxiety and pain in adults undergoing cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart. 2021;8(1):e001474. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Kruzik N. Benefits of preoperative education for adult elective surgery patients. AORN J. 2009;90(3):381-87.[crossref][PubMed]
24.
Cohen SP, Mao J. Neuropathic pain: Mechanisms and their clinical implications. BMJ. 2014;348. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Locsin RG. The effect of music on the pain of selected post-operative patients. J Adv Nurs. 1981;6(1):19-25. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Liang J, Tian X, Yang W. Application of music therapy in general surgical treatment. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:6169183. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Meltem UY, Korhan EA. The effect of music therapy on pain and anxiety in intensive care patients. Pain. 2011;23(4):139-46. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Kim JY, Wie GA, Cho YA, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim SK, et al. Diet modification based on the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program (ERAS) in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection. Clinical Nutrition Research. 2018;7(4):297-302. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hübner M, Klek S, et al. ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(3):623-50. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Smith TW Jr, Wang X, Singer MA, Godellas CV, Vaince FT. Enhanced recovery after surgery: A clinical review of implementation across multiple surgical subspecialties. Am J Surg. 2020;219(3):530-34. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: A consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005;24(3):466-77. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Williams DG, Ohnuma T, Krishnamoorthy V, Raghunathan K, Sulo S, Cassady BA, et al. Impact of early postoperative oral nutritional supplement utilisation on clinical outcomes in colorectal surgery. Perioper Med. 2020;9(1):01-09.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60507.17841

Date of Submission: Sep 29, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 12, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Mar 02, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 04, 2022
• Manual Googling: Feb 03, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 13, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com