Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 68473

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : GC01 - GC04 Full Version

Association of Human Leukocyte Antigen Gene Variants rs13192471 and rs6457617 with Rheumatoid Arthritis Susceptibility: A Case-control Study from North-western India


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63436.17887
Indermohan Singh Sandhu, Hemender Singh, Anupama Mahajan, Gurinder Mohan, Swarkar Sharma, Prakash Singh, Simranpreet Kaur, Amarjit Singh Bhanwer

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Genetics, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 2. Research Associate, Department of Biotechnology, Sri Mata Vaishno Devi University, Katra, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 3. Professor, Department of Anatomy, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Medicine, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Sri Mata Vaishno Devi University, Katra, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 6. Senior Orthopaedics Consultant, Department of Orthopaedics, Parkash Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 7. Assistant Professor, Department of Genetics, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 8. Professor and Head, Department of Genetics, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab

Correspondence Address :
Indermohan Singh Sandhu,
Assistant Professor, Deptartment of Genetics, SGRD Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mehta Road, Amritsar-143501, Punjab, India.
E-mail: imssandhu.gen@sgrdimsr.in

Abstract

Introduction: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a systemic, chronic, inflammatory, and autoimmune disease which is characterised by the progressive ruination of joint structures. The Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) genes: HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1, belonging to HLA family, presented on human chromosome six, are involved in the immune system. Various studies involving Genome-wide Association Studies (GWAS), meta-analysis, and replication studies have shown the association of HLA-DRB1 variant rs13192471 and HLA-DQB1 variant rs6457617 with RA susceptibility in different population groups.

Aim: To perform a replication case-control based association study of variants rs13192471 and rs6457617, in order to determine their association with RA, in an independent cohort from the population of North-western India.

Materials and Methods: The case-control study conducted at Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India, duration of the study was, from May 2019 to June 2022. In this study, Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) was isolated from 188 RA cases and 310 healthy controls, followed by qualitative and quantitative analyses. The genotyping was performed on a Real Time-polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) using TaqMan Allele Discrimination Assay. Statistical power of the study was estimated using PS: Power and sample size calculator version 3.1.

Results: The statistical analysis of the genotyping data showed a significant association (p=0.005) of variant rs13192471 with RA susceptibility, whereas the variant rs6457617 did not show an association (p=0.275) with RA in the studied population cohort.

Conclusion: The present study successfully replicated the association of HLA-DRB1 variant rs13192471 in the population group of North-western India. It is pertinent to screen these variants for RA susceptibility in other population groups of India before their use as potential genetic biomarkers in the Indian population.

Keywords

Autoimmune diseases, Genome wide association study, Genotyping, TaqMan assay

The rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease with immunologically arbitrated inflammation of synovia-lined joints that can significantly disrupt joint construction and task (1). RA is an exemplar of an intricate genetic state with undetermined genetic diversity and origin, and it almost certainly involves several genes (2). A persistent inflammatory joint illness RA is known to be caused by reactions of autoimmunity to Anti-citrullinated Peptide Antibody (ACPA) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG), frequently known to be Rheumatoid Factor (RF) (3). Besides RF, RA patients often exhibit antibodies peculiar to other proteins, such as type II collagen (COL-II) and Human Cartilage glycoprotein 39 (HC gp-39) (4). Regular demonstration of RA is generally polyarthritis with firmness, ache, and protuberance of multiple joints in a symmetric pattern (5).

The human Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) system genes, also known as the HLA family, are one of the most polymorphic genetic systems and control effector immunity units (6). The heritability of RA is approximately 60%, to which HLA contributes around 11-37% (7). HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 genes are located on chromosome 6, play an essential role in the immune system, and are well known for playing a role in RA pathogenesis (8). A strong connection between RA and HLA alleles has long been reported. The DR and DQ loci of the HLA gene have been reported in strong linkage disequilibrium and associated with RA in many studies of Caucasian and East asian populations (9). GWAS of RA also exhibited remarkable associations with various Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) near the HLA-DRB1 gene with RA in European, Korean and Japanese populations. The significant SNPs with this association are rs7765379, rs6457617, rs660895 and rs13192471 (10),(11),(12). HLA variant rs6457617 was also associated with RA in Spanish and Han Chinese populations (13),(14). HLA SNP rs6457617 was associated with RA susceptibility, while SNP rs13192471 showed no association with RA in Tunisian (12). Indian populations are highly diverse. A study from North-eastern India showed an association of SNP rs13192471 in susceptibility and severity of RA, whereas SNP rs6457617 did not (15). However, another study showed that both HLA SNPs, rs13192471 and rs6457617, are associated with a significant risk for RA in the Northern Indian population (16) which indicate genetic heterogeneity in RA.

As there is significant genetic heterogeneity in RA among different world populations, replication analysis studies to find the association of various susceptibility loci with RA in multiple populations is essential, making screening in the North-western Indian population critical. With this objective, the present study was performed in a case-control association designed to screen HLA variants rs13192471 and rs6457617 in the North-western Indian population cohort.

Material and Methods

The present case-control study was conducted at Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar in association with Sri Mata Vaishno Devi University, Katra, Jammu and Kashmir, duration of the study was, from May 2019 to June 2022. The study was initiated after the due approval by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Ref no. Patho 339/19.dated 06/04/2019). After getting the written informed consent of the participants, a venous blood sample of 2 mL was obtained and transferred to Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) vials to avoid coagulation. The samples were transported to a laboratory, in an icebox and kept at-20ºC until the Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) had been extracted. Participants included 188 ACR/EULAR (American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism) Criterion confirmed RA cases, and 310 age and sex matched healthy controls.

Inclusion criteria: The minimum age for cases to include in this study was 18 years to avoid inclusion of juvenile RA cases in this study with no upper limit of age for the inclusion of cases. Same age criteria were kept for controls with disease free status related to any autoimmune disease, and any disease related to bone, articular cartilage, or endocrine system.

Exclusion criteria: For both cases and controls, individuals with conditions like cancer, diabetes mellitus, neurological disorders, thyroid dysfunction, infectious disease, arthritis other than RA for cases and females with pregnancy and nursing mothers were excluded.

Study Procedure

The isolation of DNA is done using a MagGenome® XpressDNA blood kit. Then agarose gel electrophoresis was performed to determine the quality of isolated DNA samples. The concentration of the DNA samples was determined using NanoDrop™ 2000/2000c (Thermo Scientific). The 50 μL dilutions (10 ng/μL) of DNA samples were prepared by adding nuclease-free water.

Genotyping of variant rs13192471 and rs6457617: Using the TaqMan allele discrimination test, the SNP genotyping of variants was assessed in the studied population group. Taqman® SNP genotyping assay from Applied Biosystems (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Pleasanton, CA, USA) was used for genotyping the variants rs13192471 and rs6457617 using Mx3005p Agilent RT-PCR (Stratagene Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). The Taqman genotyping assay was diluted using TE (Tris EDTA) from 40X to 20X as directed by the manufacturer. The genotyping was performed using a 96-well plate with 93 samples and three Non Template Controls (NTC). The overall amount of the PCR reaction mix was 10 μL, including 3 μL of DNA concentration of 10 ng/μL. Rest of the constituents included 1 μL 1X PCR buffer, 0.25 μL 0.5X of TaqMan assay, 0.2 μL 0.2 mM of dNTPs, 0.1 μL 0.3 U of Taq Polymerase, 5.45 μL of distilled water was used to make up the volume of the reaction. The cycling conditions consist of a 4-minute hold at 95°C, 40 cycles at 15-second intervals at 95°C, and one minute at 60°C with endpoint detection. The RT-PCR post-PCR detection equipment was used to assess the allele-specific fluorescence. Reruns were performed to determine final inclusion for samples that failed genotyping or had ambiguous genotypes.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical power of the study was estimated using PS: Power and sample size calculator version 3.1. The analysis of genotyping data was performed in PLINK version 1.09. An Odds Ratio (OR) was calculated to determine the chance of an outcome in response to exposure (allele or genotype). The value and 95% Confidence Interval (CI), which gives the relationship or assesses the likelihood of an outcome, were computed together. The OR indicates how frequently the patients are more at risk than controls. The Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) was also calculated using the Chi-square test.

Results

Most of the RA cases in this study cohort were females (146/188, 77.65%). For enrolled subjects, the average age was 48.43±12.08 years. The average age of onset of disease was 44.49±10.96 years. Of 188 RA cases, 68.61% of the patients were seropositive for RF. This study group’s average Body Mass Index (BMI) was 24.72±3.78. The middle Waist-Hip Ratio (WHR) was 0.88±0.072. Only 3.19% of patients were smokers, and 5.85% took alcohol regularly. Around 62% of the patients were taking a purely vegetarian diet.

SNP Analyses

Genotypic analyses of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs6457617: The allelic distribution of variant rs13192471 was evaluated. The C allele was observed as a minor allele with a frequency of 0.18 (18%) in cases and 0.11 (11%) in controls in the studied cohort. The variant rs13192471 showed a significant association (p-value 0.005) with RA susceptibility and the T allele as a risk allele for RA with the OR of 1.77, 95% CI (1.18-2.64), in the present studied cohort. The allelic distribution of variant rs13192471 of HLADRB1 was in not in accordance with HWE in both the cases as well as controls.

In order to further evaluate and increase the power of the study and overcome confounding factors effects, logistic regression analyses were adopted with the recessive (CT+TT vs CC) and dominant model (CT+CC vs TT), where TT is wild homozygous genotype, CT is heterozygous genotype and CC is mutant homozygous genotype. In the dominant model, the OR obtained was 1.96 (1.23-3.14 at 95% CI), p=0.004, adjusted with age, gender, BMI and ethnicity. The results showed a significant association of variant rs13192471 with RA in the population belonging to Northern India. The frequency of TT, CT and CC genotype was found to be 69.18% vs 81.51%, 25.34% vs 14.72% and 5.48% vs 3.77% in the RA cases and controls respectively. A Chi-square test of independence was performed to examine the relation between three genotypes between cases and controls. The result came to be significant with the p-value 0.016 (Table/Fig 1).

Genotypic analyses of single nucleotide polymorphism rs6457617: The allelic distribution of variant rs6457617 was evaluated. The T allele was observed as a minor allele with a frequency of 0.38 (38%) in cases and 0.34 (34%) in controls in the studied cohort. The variant rs6457617 showed a non significant association (p-value 0.275) with RA susceptibility with an OR of 1.18, 95% CI (0.87-1.60), in the present studied cohort. The allelic distribution of variant rs6457617 of HLADQB1 was in not in accordance with HWE in both the cases as well as controls. In order to further evaluate and increase the power of the study and overcome confounding factors effects, logistic regression analyses were adopted with dominant model (CT+TT vs CC) and recessive models (CT+CC vs TT), where CC is homozygous wild genotype, CT is heterozygous genotype and TT is homozygous mutant genotype. The results showed no significant association of variant rs6457617 with RA in the population belonging to Northern India (p>0.05). The frequency of CC, CT and TT genotype was found to be 44.12% vs 48%, 36.03% vs 36% and 19.85% vs 16% in the RA cases and controls respectively. A Chi-square test of independence was performed to examine the relation between these three genotypes in cases and controls. The result came to be non significant with the p-value 0.584 (Table/Fig 2).

Discussion

The RA is a long-term autoimmune disorder with a world prevalence of approximately 0.46% (17). India’s majority distribution is found to vary among various geographical regions and ranges from 0.28% to 0.75% (18). Various GWAS and meta-analyses in Asian populations came out with results which link multiple genes/loci of known immune function with RA susceptibility (19). The disease has been explored for its genetic susceptibility to various genes and its SNPs across diverse populations using multiple study designs. Findings from these studies signify genetic heterogeneity in RA susceptibility across different populations (16). The involvement of genes from the HLA region in RA susceptibility and severity has been well-known (9), especially the HLA class II genes which include DQA1, DQB1 and DRB1 (20). The SNPs from the HLA region, rs13192471 and rs6457617, were most widely reported across various populations across the world with heterogeneity. Thus, the variants were chosen to study the association with RA in a population cohort from North-western India.

Interestingly, the variant rs13192471 was found to be significantly associated with risk (p-value=0.005) in present study population. At the same time, the variant rs6457617 was not significantly associated with RA susceptibility (p-value=0.275) in this population cohort. Our findings showed similar results as observed in the North-eastern Indian population (15) and partial overlap with the study from populations corresponding to Northern India (16) and the European population (10),(11),(12) but contrasting to results from Tunisian, Spanish and Han Chinese populations, where they 3established a significant association of rs6457617 (12),(13),(14). A peculiar finding of deviation in the genotype frequencies for both the variants from the HWE was observed in the study. This could be attributed to the polymorphic nature of the HLA locus and another possibility that the region might be under natural selection and with bias in allele frequencies of the variants, thereby not following HWE.

Limitation(s)

The study group comprised of participants from North-western India only. As Indian population is very diverse, replication and exploration in other population cohorts is critically needed.

Conclusion

This is the first replication study evaluating the association of HLA-DRB1 variant rs13192471 and HLA-DQB1 variant rs6457617 in the population group of North-western India. The present study highlights the need to replicate the study with increased sample size and investigate other genes in the HLA region with RA susceptibility. Moreover, with high genetic diversity and thus anticipated genetic heterogeneity, such replication studies are warranted in different population groups of India. They will strengthen the identification of potential genetic biomarkers for the various Indian populations and contribute towards futuristic goals of polygenic risks and personalised medicine.

References

1.
Kay J, Upchurch KS. ACR/EULAR 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51(Suppl 6):vi5-9. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. Association of MHC and rheumatoid arthritis: HLA polymorphisms in phenotypic variants of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2000;2(3):01-05. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Abbasi M, Mousavi MJ, Jamalzehi S, Alimohammadi R, Bezvan MH, Mohammadi H, et al. Strategies toward rheumatoid arthritis therapy; the old and the new. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2019;234(7):10018-31. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Nepomnyashchikh T, Antonets D, Shchelkunov S. Gene therapy of arthritis. Russian Journal of Genetics. 2016;52(6):543-56. [crossref]
5.
Harris ED Jr. Rheumatoid arthritis. Pathophysiology and implications for therapy. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1990;322(18):1277-89. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Golovanova O, Konenkov V, Shevchenko A, Smolnikova M. Frequencies of the DRB1, DQA1, DQB1 and TNFA alleles in immigrant population of west Siberia. Russian Journal of Genetics. 2009;45(8):981-86. [crossref]
7.
Kurko J, Besenyei T, Laki J, Glant TT, Mikecz K, Szekanecz Z. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis-a comprehensive review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2013;45(2):170-79. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Wysocki T, Olesinska M, Paradowska-Gorycka A. Current understanding of an emerging role of HLA-DRB1 gene in rheumatoid arthritis-from research to clinical practice. Cells. 2020;9(5):1127. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Van Drongelen V, Holoshitz J. Human leukocyte antigen-disease associations in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatic Disease Clinics. 2017;43(3):363-76. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Wellcome Trust Case Control C. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature. 2007;447(7145):661-78. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Plenge RM, Seielstad M, Padyukov L, Lee AT, Remmers EF, Ding B, et al. TRAF1-C5 as a risk locus for rheumatoid arthritis-a genomewide study. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;357(12):1199-209. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Achour Y, Ben Hamad M, Chaabane S, Rebai A, Marzouk S, Mahfoudh N, et al. Analysis of two susceptibility SNPs in HLA region and evidence of interaction between rs6457617 in HLA-DQB1 and HLA-DRB1*04 locus on Tunisian rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Genetics. 2017;96(6):911-18. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Julia A, Ballina J, Canete JD, Balsa A, Tornero-Molina J, Naranjo A, et al. Genome-wide association study of rheumatoid arthritis in the Spanish population: KLF12 as a risk locus for rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2008;58(8):2275-86. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Li H, Hu Y, Zhang T, Liu Y, Wang Y, Yang T, et al. Replication of british rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility Loci in two unrelated chinese population groups. Clinical & Developmental Immunology. 2013;2013:891306. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Das S, Baruah C, Saikia AK, Bose S. Associative role of HLA-DRB1 SNP genotypes as risk factors for susceptibility and severity of rheumatoid arthritis: A North-east Indian population-based study. Int J Immunogenet. 2018;45(1):01-07. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Prasad P, Kumar A, Gupta R, Juyal RC, Thelma BK. Caucasian and Asian specific rheumatoid arthritis risk loci reveal limited replication and apparent allelic heterogeneity in north Indians. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31584. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Almutairi K, Nossent J, Preen D, Keen H, Inderjeeth C. The global prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis based on a systematic review. Rheumatol Int. 2021;41(5):863-77. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Handa R, Rao UR, Lewis JF, Rambhad G, Shiff S, Ghia CJ. Literature review of rheumatoid arthritis in India. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases. 2016;19(5):440-51.[crossref][PubMed]
19.
Hollis-Moffatt JE, Chen-Xu M, Topless R, Dalbeth N, Gow PJ, Harrison AA, et al. Only one independent genetic association with rheumatoid arthritis within the KIAA1109-TENR-IL2-IL21 locus in Caucasian sample sets: Confirmation of association of rs6822844 with rheumatoid arthritis at a genome-wide level of significance. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(3):R116. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Ortiz-Fernandez L, Martin J, Alarcon-Riquelme ME. A summary on the genetics of systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and sjogren’s syndrome. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63436.17887

Date of Submission: Feb 14, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 11, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 05, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 18, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 02, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 25, 2023 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com