Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 145676

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : EC26 - EC29 Full Version

Activity of Labile Coagulation Factors, Factor X and Fibrinogen Level in Frozen Plasma versus Fresh Frozen Plasma


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59683.17857
Swarupa Nikhil Bhagwat, Jayashree Harihara Sharma, Omkar Ramakant Kadhane, Poonam Lalla

1. Associate Professor, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 3. Deputy Product Manager, Department of Coagulation, Transasia Biomedicals Ltd., Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 4. AGM, Department of Scientific Marketing, Transasia Biomedicals Ltd., Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Swarupa Nikhil Bhagwat,
Associate Professor, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: bhagwatswarupa41@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) is a blood component separated from whole blood and frozen below -30°C within 8 hours of donation for optimum preservation of coagulation factors. However, logistic and geographical reasons may hamper separation of plasma within 8 hours and the separation may have to be delayed to between 8 and 24 hours and then frozen below -30°C which is called as Frozen Plasma (FP). Plasma separated between 8 and 24 hours is a licensed blood component in the United States of America (USA) for therapeutic use similar to FFP. It is not licensed in India leading to frequent shortage of plasma.

Aim: To compare the activity of factors V, VIII and X and the level of fibrinogen between FFP and FP, so as to assess the therapeutic use of FP for formulating recommendation as licensed blood component.

Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Transfusion Medicine at Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. The duration of the study was 10 months, from January 2018 to October 2018. Fifty units each of FFP and FP matched for the camp location, age, gender and blood group were selected. There were 44 males and six females in each of FFP and FP groups. They were compared for the activity of labile coagulation factors (factors V and VIII) and stable factor X. The level of fibrinogen was also measured in both components. It was done within 30 days of preparation of plasma. The mean values of each of the four parameters for FFP and FP were calculated and compared for statistical significance (p) by using unpaired Student’s t-test. Microsoft Excel 2016 was used for statistical analysis. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean age of FFP and FP individuals (blood donors) was 31.2 and 31.3 years respectively, while the median age in years was 31 and 30.5, respectively. The activity/level of all the tested coagulation factors was lower in FP as compared to FFP. The difference was statistically significant for factor VIII (p-value <0.05). It was not significant for factor V, X and fibrinogen. The level/activity of coagulation factors in FP, though lower than that in FFP, fell within normal reference range in 90-95% of units.

Conclusion: FP may be used as a therapeutic alternative to FFP excluding patients of haemophilia A in whom factor VIII concentrate and cryoprecipitate are considered better therapeutic modalities. Results of similar multicentre studies will help in formulating recommendations regarding licensing.

Keywords

Blood components, Factor V, Factor VIII, Stable clotting factors

The FFP is a blood component that is frozen below -30°C within a short specified period after collection (usually 8 hours) (1). It contains plasma proteins and all the coagulation factors, including the labile factors V and VIII (2). The use of FFP is indicated in patients with single coagulation factor deficiencies where the appropriate concentrate is not available (for example: factors V, XI), acute disseminated intravascular coagulation, plasma exchange for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), and in some instances of liver disease, warfarin reversal, cardiopulmonary bypass, and massive transfusion (3). When FFP is frozen within 8 hours of its preparation at below -30°C, levels of coagulation factors like V, VIII, II, IX, X, XI, and fibrinogen remain stable with good relevant activity (1),(4). Factors V and VIII are known labile factors, whereas, fibrinogen is a stable factor. Factor VIII level is also one of the quality control parameters for FFP as per the guidelines by Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), India (5). According to these guidelines, 75% of the units of FFP should have factor VIII levels greater than 0.7 IU/mL. To meet this requirement, plasma is usually separated from whole blood and frozen within 8 hours of collection (6),(7).

These requirements for FFP preparation limit the number of units of whole blood that can be processed into FFP in large blood centres that collect and transport blood over a wide geographic area. In a few situations, it is not possible to separate the whole blood and/or freeze the separated plasma within 8 hours of collection due to logistic and administrative reasons (8),(9),(10). These limitations result in not infrequent shortages of FFP (8). Extension of the allowable processing time for plasma for transfusion i.e., FFP to 24 hours after collection of whole blood would alleviate this problem. This plasma that is frozen at later intervals (usually up to 24 hours) after collection has been referred to as plasma frozen within 24 hours after phlebotomy (PF24) (1). There have been growing global interest and efforts invested in exploring the efficacy and benefits of using PF24 for transfusion purpose. PF24 is a licensed blood component in the USA [11,12]. Since, it is not yet licensed in India, it cannot be used for therapeutic purposes for indications similar to FFP.

A number of studies have been performed to investigate the effect of extended storage of blood prior to plasma separation, especially on coagulation factors (6),(8),(10),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19). Only one out of these studies is from India, which was conducted in a Northern Indian state (13). Considering this background, the authors undertook this prospective observational study with the overall goal to determine whether separation of plasma after 8 hours of blood collection has any effect on the level of coagulation factors. To achieve this goal, the activity of labile coagulation factors (V and VIII), factor X and level of fibrinogen in FFP were compared with those in the plasma units that were separated and frozen after 8 hours of collection but before 24 hours of blood collection (FP).

Material and Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Transfusion Medicine at Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. The duration of the study was 10 months, from January 2018 to October 2018. The blood centre collects on an average 2000 blood units per month indoor, as well as, from outdoor blood donation camps. Ethical approval was granted by the Institutional Ethics Committee as per approval letter no. IEC/116/2016 and continuation permission letter IEC (I)/OUT/1907 dated 28/8/2017.

Sample size calculation: The study was performed on plasma samples obtained from the segments of plasma units. It was performed on 50 units each of FFP and plasma separated after 8 hours (FP). The sample size calculation was based on the level of significance (p-value=0.05), the desired margin of error and standard deviation (20).

The following formula was used:

n=(for Zσd/E)2
where Z=confidence level=1.96 for 95%. σd=standard deviation=71.2% for factor VIII level in FFP as obtained from one year quality control data of factor VIII on FFP at tertiary blood centre. The authors considered standard deviation of factor VIII in calculation as it is a heat labile coagulation factor and a quality control parameter for FFP. E=desired margin of error=20% as considered for the present study.

N=(1.96×71.2/20)2=48.68Ëœ50 units each of FFP and FP

Inclusion criteria: Samples from plasma units separated between 8 and 24 hours and those separated within 8 hours of collection matched for age, gender and ABO blood group were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Study samples which showed visible lipemia and/or which were reactive for any of the Transfusion-Transmissible Infections (TTIs) (i.e., HIV, hepatitis C, hepatitis B, malaria, syphilis) were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Plasma separation: The blood units that were collected in double bags 350 mL capacity (Polymedicure Ltd., India) containing Citrate Phosphate Dextrose Adenine (CPDA) anticoagulant- preservative- solution. Double blood bags were used for preparation of red cell concentrate and plasma only. Clean and continuous flow of blood was ensured during blood collection since intermittent and slow flow affects the activity of coagulation factors (11). They were maintained at a temperature of 2 to 6°C during transportation and processing. The whole blood units that were received in the blood bank from the campsite within 6 hours of collection were separated into FFP to ensure that, the separation and freezing were completed within 8 hours limit. Blood units received from the same campsite after 8 hours were stored between temperatures 2 to 6 °C overnight (Walk-in Chiller, BlueStar Limited, India) and then separated within 24 hours of collection (FP). In both the above cases, separation of plasma units was performed on cold centrifuge machine (Thermo Scientific Cryofuge 6000 i centrifuge, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) at 4000 rpm at 4°C for 7 minutes as per the standard operating procedure. The tubings of the plasma bags were carefully stripped and refilled so that, the composition of plasma in the whole plasma bag including the attached tubing is uniform and the plasma sample in the tubing is representative of the whole plasma unit. Segments of approximately 3 cm length were made using tube sealer. They were not detached from the plasma bag but were labelled with the original plasma unit number. The separated plasma units along with the attached segments were frozen immediately at -80°C using ultra low freezer (-80°C) (Cryo Scientific Systems Pvt., Ltd., Chennai, India).

Sample selection: The sample selection was done after two days of collection to ensure that, the mandatory ABO blood grouping and TTI testing of the blood units were completed. At first, the data of the FP units were accessed and the donor unit numbers were recorded in a separate register. The results of TTI testing and ABO grouping of the blood units, as well as, the demographic data of the corresponding blood donors (age and gender) were recorded. All the details were obtained from the mandatory documentation in the blood bank. Before the samples were selected, all the plasma units (FFP and FP) were inspected to ensure that, they are not visibly lipemic. Then FP units that tested non-reactive for TTI were selected and recorded. The records of FFP units prepared from the same blood donation camp were inspected. The numbers of TTI nonreactive FFP units that matched the FP units with respect to ABO blood group, age and gender were noted down. In case, there were more than one matching units, the selection was done by using chit method. The matching for ABO blood group, age and gender was done because these factors are known to influence the level/activity of coagulation factors (21). The O blood group individuals have lower levels of factor VIII in their plasma as compared to other ABO blood groups (non O blood groups) (22). Hence, they were matched as O blood group and other non O ABO blood groups.

The data of the FP units were reviewed first followed by matching with FFP data because, the latter were more in number (out of total separated plasma, FFP and FP units were 90% and 10% respectively). Hence, it was easier to find ABO and age matched FFP units corresponding to the FP units. Thus, 50 units each of FP and FFP were selected over a period of one month from eight camp locations. Their numbers were noted in tabular format in an Excel sheet. Case record forms were prepared for each unit separately, mentioning FFP/FP, unit number, age, gender, ABO blood group, date of collection, date and time of separation, date of testing, results of coagulation tests (factors V, VIII, X and fibrinogen).

Testing of plasma samples: The quality control requirements states that, 4 units or 1% of all blood component units (whichever is more) should be tested (6). As per this, coagulation factor testing as a part of quality control of FFP is performed within one month of component preparation. To maintain uniformity across all the batches tested, the authors chose 21st day after separation of FP to perform the required coagulation tests. FFP samples that were obtained from the camp location and were matched for age, gender and ABO blood group were also tested simultaneously, in the same batch as FP to avoid any batch related bias. Since, FFP units were separated and frozen one day earlier than FP, it corresponded to 22nd day of separation of FFP while it was 21st day of separation for FP. The attached tubing segments of FFP and FP were cut and thawed in plasma bath at 37°C for 30 minutes to ensure that, all the plasma was liquefied. The liquefied plasma was drained into plastic tubes labelled with the corresponding unit numbers. The coagulation tests were performed on ECLL412-Four Channel Semiautomated Coagulation Analyser (Transasia Biomedicals Ltd.,) as per the manufacturer’s instructions and the instrument operator manual. The Erba (Transasia) factor deficient plasma was used for factors V, VIII and X quantitation. Erba thrombin reagent was used for fibrinogen determination.

Factors V, VIII , X: The quantitative measurement of factors V, VIII and X was done by one stage method (23). A dilution of test plasma was mixed with factor deficient plasma and the clot time of the mixture was determined. The degree of clot time correction with the patient plasma was compared to the correction with a reference material, allowing the percentage activity of the test plasma to be determined.

Fibrinogen: Fibrinogen concentration was determined based on Clauss method (24). The clotting time of dilute plasma was measured after addition of thrombin. The clot time is proportional to fibrinogen concentration (reference range: 200-400 mg/dL) (25).

Statistical Analysis

The mean values of each of the four parameters (factors V, factor VIII, factor X and fibrinogen) were calculated for both the groups (FFP and FP). They were compared for statistical significance (p) by using unpaired Student’s t-test. MS Excel 2016 was used for statistical analysis. The (p-value <0.05) was considered statistically significant.

Results

The mean age of FFP and FP individuals (blood donors) was 31.2 and 31.3 years, respectively while the median age in years was 31 and 30.5, respectively. There were 44 males and six females in each of FFP and FP groups. There were 22 O blood group donors while 28 were non O group donors. The mean values of factors V and VIII (labile coagulation factors) and factor X and fibrinogen (stable coagulation factors) were compared between FFP and FP (Table/Fig 1). The coagulation factor activity/level in FFP was taken as baseline as FFP is a licensed blood component, prepared regularly as blood component preparation activity and is not subjected to delay in preparation. The levels of all the studied coagulation factors were lesser in FP units as compared to those in FFP units as observed by percentage decrease in their mean values. However, unpaired Student’s t-test showed that, the difference was not statistically significant for factor V (p-value=0.133), factor X (p-value=0.228) and fibrinogen (p-value=0.415). Conversely, factor VIII level was significantly lower (p-value=0.00065) in FP units as compared to FFP units.

Discussion

The study compared 50 samples of FFP and FP for the activity of heat-labile coagulation factors and heat-stable factor X, as well as, level of fibrinogen. The objective was to assess the effect of storage of whole blood beyond 8 hours at 2-6°C on the coagulation factors. The present study, showed 23.45% lower activity of factor VIII in FP plasma as compared to FFP. This was statistically significant (p-value <0.05). The levels of factor V, factor X and fibrinogen were also lower by 6.78, 4.02 and 4.3%, respectively in FP as compared to FFP in the present study. However, the difference was not statistically significant. Kakaiya RM et al., compared two preparations of plasma separated and frozen within six hours (FFP I) and within 18-20 hours (FFP II) from CPDA-1 whole blood units (17). Factor VIII activity was significantly lesser in FFP II (p<0.01). Factor V activity in both the products was equivalent. Cardigan compared FP separated from leucodepleted whole blood after storage at 4°C overnight (18-24 hours) with FFP separated within 8 hours from leucodepleted whole blood (6). Factor VIII level in the former was 23% lower than that in the latter. They also found fibrinogen level to be 12% lower in the former which was statistically significant. Agus N et al., separated and froze plasma after 24 hours storage of whole blood at 4°C. This plasma showed 25% reduction in factor VIII levels as compared to FFP (18). In a similar study by Dogra, 24 hour-separated plasma units showed 18.4% lower factor VIII activity when compared to that in FFP. However, fall in the activity of factor V was 6.52% which was not statistically significant (13). The level of fibrinogen fell by 1.81% which too was not significant. In a study by Alhumaidan H et al., plasma units were prepared from Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) after 8 hours and 24 hours room temperature hold. Additional plasma units were separated from whole blood donations kept at room temperature for 24 hours. Plasma units separated after 24 hours showed factor VIII and factor V levels 20% and 6% lesser than those in FFP. However, the fall in factor V level was not statistically significant (14). A study by Afifi OAH et al., showed reduced factor VIII and fibrinogen in plasma separated within 24 hours (PF24) as compared to FFP with a conclusion that PF24 can be used for same indications as FFP except indications requiring FVIII and/or fibrinogen replacement (26). In a study by Yazer MH et al., coagulation factor levels in plasma frozen within 24 hours of phlebotomy (FP24) were estimated over 5 days of storage at 1°C to 6°C. The results showed comparable factor assay levels in thawed plasma prepared from FFP and FP24 (27). Dumont LJ et al., showed reduced factor VIII level in plasma that was separated after 20 to 24 hours of room temperature holding as compared to FFP (28).

Though, separation and freezing within 8 hours is the standard prescribed protocol for preparation of blood components in India, logistic and geographical reasons may cause difficulty in implementing the standard practice on day to day basis. Non separation of plasma within 8 hours due to long distance blood donation campsite with additional hindrance from traffic conditions would frequently lead to FFP being in short supply (10),(16). The purpose of the present study was to assess the clinical utility of a plasma component that was separated and frozen after 8 hours of whole blood donation. The two types of blood components (plasma separated within 8 hours of blood collection and between 8 to 24 hours of collection) showed statistically insignificant difference in the level of fibrinogen and activity of factors X and V. Though, the factor VIII activity was significantly lower in FP, in 90-95% of the tested FP, the activity fell within normal range of 50% to 150% (29). Thus, 24 hours plasma should prove clinically beneficial in most patients with coagulation factor deficiencies, except those with haemophilia A. However, factor VIII concentrates and cryoprecipitate are better therapeutic modalities for haemophilia A (30),(31),(32).

Limitation(s)

The study was limited to single blood centre.

Conclusion

Plasma that is separated from whole blood after 8 hours of collection retains the level/activity of coagulation factors. The outcome of similar studies in future from different blood centres in India, will help in formulating recommendations for the therapeutic use of plasma that is separated between 8 and 24 hours of collection.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Research Society, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital for providing financial assistance for the laboratory reagents used in the present study.

References

1.
Stanworth SJ, Tinmouth AT. Plasma transfusion and use of albumin. In: Simon TL, editor. Rossi’s Principles of Transfusion Medicine. 4th ed. Oxford, West Sussex, New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing; 2009. Pp. 287-97. [crossref]
2.
Apfelroth S. Standard terminology for plasma products. Transfusion. 2003;43(7):983. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
O’Shaughnessy DF, Atterbury C, Bolton Maggs P, Murphy M, Thomas D, Yates S, et al. Guidelines for the use of fresh-frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate and cryosupernatant. Br J Haematol. 2004;126:11-28. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Anderson KC, Hillyer CD, Ness PM, Crookes RL, Silberstein LE, Roback JD. FFP and related products. 2nd ed. Blood Banking and Transfusion Medicine. 2007. Pp. 259-60.
5.
Quality assurance in blood transfusion. In: Saran RK, editor. Technical Manual. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Directorate General of Health Services; 2003. Pp. 354.
6.
Cardigan R, Lawrie AS, Mackie IJ, Williamson LM. The quality of fresh frozen plasma produced from whole blood stored at 4°C overnight. Transfusion. 2005;45:1342-48. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Bala G, Gupta A, Suri V, Chhabra S, Shaffy, Gupta R. Quality control of fresh frozen plasma using factor VIII and fibrinogen levels as measure: One year study in a tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2019;6(8):H1-H3.[crossref]
8.
O’Neill EM, Rowley J, Hansson-Wicher M, McCarter S, Ragno G, Valeri CR. Effect of 24 hour whole blood storage on plasma clotting factors. Transfusion. 1999;39:488-89. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Cardigan R, Van der Meer PF, Pergande C, Cookson P, Baumann-Baretti B, Cancelas JA, et al. Coagulation factor content of plasma produced from whole blood stored for 24 hours at ambient temperature: Results from an international multicenter BEST Collaborative study. Transfusion. 2011;51(Suppl 1):50S-57S. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Smith JF, Ness PM, Moroff G, Luban NL. Retention of coagulation factors in plasma frozen after extended holding at 1-6°C. Vox Sang. 2000;78:28-30. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Kakaiya R, Aronson CA, Julleis J. Whole blood collection and component processing at blood collection centers. In: Roback JD, Grossman BJ, Harris T, Hillyer CD, eds. Technical Manual. 17th ed. Bethesda, MD: American Association of Blood Banks; 2011:187-226.
12.
Horstman EE, Christopher A. Plasma products for transfusion: An overview. Ann Blood. 2022;7:4. [crossref]
13.
Dogra M, Sidhu M, Vasudev R, Dogra A. Comparative analysis of activity of coagulation Factors V and VIII and level of fibrinogen in fresh frozen plasma and frozen plasma. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2015;9:06-08. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Alhumaidan H, Cheves T, Holme S, Sweeney J. Stability of coagulation factors in plasma prepared after a 24-hour room temperature hold. Transfusion. 2010;50:1934-42. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Nilsson L, Hedner U, Nilsson IM, Robertson B. Shelf-life of bank blood and stored plasma with special reference to coagulation factors. Transfusion. 1983;23:377-81. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kakaiya RM, Morse EE, Panek S. Labile coagulation factors in thawed fresh frozen plasma prepared by two methods. Vox Sang. 1984;46:44-46. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Sohmer PR, Bolin RB, Scott RL, Smith DJ. Effect of delayed refrigeration on plasma factors in whole blood collected in CPDA-2. Transfusion. 1982;22:488-90. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Agus N, Yilmaz N, Colak A, Liv F. Levels of factor VIII and factor IX in fresh-frozen plasma produced from whole blood stored at 4°C overnight in Turkey. Blood Transfus. 2012;10:191-93.
19.
Naghadeh HT, Roudkenar MH. A study of the quantity of some stable and labile coagulation factors in fresh-frozen plasma produced from whole blood stored for 24 hours in Iran. Blood Transfus. 2009;7(1):39-42.
20.
Suresh K, Chandrashekara S. Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2012;5(1):07-13. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Wang Z, Dou M, Du X, Ma L, Sun P, Cao H, et al. Influences of ABO blood group, age and gender on plasma coagulation factor VIII, fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor and ADAMTS13 levels in a Chinese population. Peer J. 2017;5:e3156. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
O’Donnell J, Laffan MA. The relationship between ABO histo-blood group, factor VIII and von Willebrand factor. Transfus Med. 2001;11(4):343-51. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Penner JA. The University of Michigan Medical School Blood Coagulation Laboratory Manual, 14th Ed., University Publications, Ann Arbor, 1979; 72-78.
24.
Clauss A. Gerinnungsphysiologische Schnellmethodezur Bestimmung des Fibrinogens. Acta Haematol. 1957;17:237-46. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Hantgan RR, Francis CW, Scheraga HA, Marder VJ. Fibrinogen structure and physiology. In: Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ, Saizman EW, editors. Hemostasis and Thrombosis-Basic Principles and Clinical Practice. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1987. Pp. 269-88.
26.
Afifi OAH, Abdelsalam EMN, Makhlouf AAEAM, Ibrahim MAM. Evaluation of coagulation factors activity in different types of plasma preparations. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2019;35(3):551-56. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Yazer MH, Cortese-Hassett A, Triulzi DJ. Coagulation factor levels in plasma frozen within 24 hours of phlebotomy over 5 days of storage at 1 to 6 degrees C. Transfusion. 2008;48:2525-30. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Dumont LJ, Cancelas JA, Maes LA, Rugg N, Whitley P, Herschel L, et al. The bioequivalence of frozen plasma prepared from whole blood held overnight at room temperature compared to fresh-frozen plasma prepared within eight hours of collection. Transfusion. 2015;55(3):476-84. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Baig MA, Swamy KB. Comparative analysis of chromogenic vs clot based one stage APTT assay for determination of factor VIII level. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2021;64:123-27.
30.
Nascimento B, Goodnough LT, Levy JH. Cryoprecipitate therapy. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:922-34. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Samuelson Bannow B, Recht M, Négrier C, Hermans C, Berntorp E, Eichler H, et al. Factor VIII: Long-established role in haemophilia A and emerging evidence beyond haemostasis. Blood Rev. 2019;35:43-50. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Nester T, AuBuchan JP. Hemotherapy decisions and their outcomes. In: Roback JD, Grossman BJ, Harris T, HillyerCD, eds. Technical Manual. 17th ed. Bethesda, MD: American Association of Blood Banks; 2011: 594.

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59683.17857

Date of Submission: Aug 16, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Oct 14, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Feb 13, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 20, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 10, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 02, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com