Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 153886

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : EC16 - EC19 Full Version

Effect of Mean Platelet Volume on Platelet Rich Plasma Based Injection Therapy in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee Joint- A Longitudinal Study


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60551.17816
Ravi K Kothari, Rohit V Bhalara, Gyanendra Singh, Rushang M Dave, Gauravi A Dhruva

1. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, PDU Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, PDU Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, PDU Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Rushang M Dave,
Aashutosh, 4 Tirupati Nagar, Near Hanuman Madhi, Raiya Road, Rajkot-360007, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: ravidave94085@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: There are different types of arthritis seen in elderly patients, of which Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common. Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP), which is derived from blood, contains many growth factors. Platelet count and indices in PRP has association with pain score of OA, further study will prove its significance.

Aim: To find the correlation of platelet parameters like platelet count, Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) and Plateletcrit (PCT) with clinical OA improvement score in PRP-treated patients of OA.

Materials and Methods: The longitudinal study was done in the Department of Pathology, PDU Civil Hospital, Rajkot, Gujarat, India, from January 2021 to October 2021. Study was conducted on 40 patients, who were administered intra-articular injection of PRP prepared using double spin method. It was injected at the site of maximum pain in the knee joint. Platelet count, MPV and PCT were noted in the pre and post intervention. Patients were followed-up at two months and six months. The data was analysed using Friedman Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Pearson’s correlation test.

Results: The mean age of patients was 58.57±4.95 years and there were 26 (65%) females and 14 (35%) males. Increase in platelet count, MPV, PCT in PRP prepared by double spin method and improvement in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Before-8.38±0.63; After-4.28±0.85), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) (Before-63.30±4.99; After- 43.67±5.22) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (Before-45.04±6.06; After-66.14±5.78) score were found to be statistically significant. Correlation of platelet parameters WOMAC with Platelet count (p-value=0.052, R-value=-0.310), VAS with MPV (p-value=0.005, R-value=0.436) and IKDC with PCT (p-value=0.032, R-value=0.339) were also statistically significant at six months follow-up.

Conclusion: Single dose intra-articular injection PRP in OA knee with KL Grade 1 and 2 is valuable, efficient and cost-effective treatment to reduce or delay in knee replacement. The study showed the significant correlation of platelet parameters with OA improvement scores.

Keywords

International knee documentation committee, Plateletcrit, Visual analog scale, Western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index

Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is now very popular for treating hair loss, sports injuries, and various inflammatory diseases. Early research suggests that Osteoarthritis (OA) pain and stiffness may be treated with PRP injections by altering the joint environment and lowering inflammation, but more research is needed to find a correlation between platelet indices of PRP and relief of pain in OA (1),(2). The PRP is injected into the affected area, such as a tendon or knee, as needed. The treating doctor may occasionally utilise ultrasonography to direct the injection. To hasten the healing process, it is intended to raise the concentration of particular bioproteins or hormones, known as growth factors, in a particular location. The mechanism underlying PRP injections is not well understood. PRP contains a high concentration of growth factors. They stimulate and accelerate the healing process. Thus, reducing pain and even boosting hair growth (3). The use of PRP to accelerate the healing of bones, cartilage, and soft tissues has revolutionised the field of musculoskeletal medicine (4).

Tissue recovery is a gradual and occasionally obstinate process. It’s crucial to find a way to quicken tissue recovery, not just for athletes but also for everyone who deals with tendinopathy, OA, acute muscular injuries, etc. Musculoskeletal professionals started using PRP for the treatment of cartilage issues as early as 2003, despite the scant scientific proof (5),(6). PRP has been demonstrated to be at least as effective as intraarticular hyaluronic acid and steroid injections for the management of symptoms in early OA of the knee (7). The use of this therapy, a minimally invasive procedure, could help to promote tissue regeneration.

Alpha granules, which are present in PRP, release almost all of their stored growth factors in the first hour and around 70% of them in the first 10 minutes (8). Some of the cells involved in tissue repair and bone and cartilage regeneration are activated by these growth factors (9). PRP is an autologous blood product, thus there is no risk of immunological reactions or disease transmission, but there is always a chance of a local reaction with any injection technique.

Platelet count and indices in PRP has association with pain score of OA, further studies are required to prove the strength of the association. Intra-articular PRP injection is a safe treatment modality with limited financial cost. However, expertise is required for the same. A research on early OA knee patients found that PRP was more efficient than placebo in reducing pain and stiffness and enhancing knee functioning in the short term (1). Thus, the present study aimed to find the correlation of platelet parameters like platelet count, Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) and Plateletcrit (PCT) with clinical OA improvement score in PRP-treated patients of OA.

Material and Methods

The present longitudinal study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, PDU Civil Hospital, Rajkot, Gujarat, India, from January 2021 to October 2021. Ethical approval (PDUMCR/IEC/155/2021) was obtained from Institutional Ethical Committee of PDU Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.

Inclusion criteria: All patients aged 50 years and above of both sexes, patients with symptomatic osteoarthritic knee of Grade 1 and 2 of Kellgren-Lawrence Grade [10,11], patients with little pain relief or no pain relief after conservative treatment <2 weeks and patients having platelet count normal (range: 1.5-4.5 lakh/mm3) were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with previous surgery of knee, significant joint swelling or clinical signs of acute inflammation, patients with septicaemia and local infection and patients with known platelet/bleeding disorder were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: According to hospital statistics there were 57 patients with knee OA in 2019 and 41 in 2020 (KL Grade 1 and 2) at the Orthopaedic Outpatient Department (OPD). During the study period, there were 40 consenting patients who wished to undergo PRP therapy and were included in the study.

Study Procedure

The 40 patients were administered intra-articular injection of PRP, over duration of six months from January 2021 to October 2021. A 15 mL of blood was collected from the patient in citrated centrifuge tube and subsequently centrifuged in two phases. PRP obtained after the 2nd spin was injected at the site of maximum pain in the knee joint. Platelet count and MPV were noted in the blood sample drawn prior to the centrifugation and repeated in the sample obtained after centrifugation. Then under the strict aseptic precautions PRP was injected intra-articularly into the affected knee, immediately (or within 30 minutes).

PRP preparation: Patients’ vitals were measured to rule out any undiagnosed pathology or raised blood pressure secondary to anxiety.

Keeping the patient in the supine position, aseptic precautions were taken and 15 mL blood was collected from the antecubital vein in citrated centrifuge tube using 20 G needle. The collected blood sample was subjected to two spins. The 1st spin, called as the soft spin, was done for 1500 rpm for 15 minutes. The supernatant plasma containing platelets was transferred into another sterile tube (without anticoagulant). Centrifuge tube at a higher speed, i.e., 3000 rpm for 10 minutes (a hard spin) to obtain a platelet concentrate. The lower 1/3rd was PRP and upper 2/3rd was Platelet-poor Plasma (PPP). Platelet pellets are formed at the bottom of the tube. PPP was removed and suspended the platelet pellets in a minimum quantity of plasma (2-4 mL) by gently shaking the tube. The remnant was PRP which is usually around 2-3 mL. The procedure was done by orthopaedic doctor at the Department of Orthopaedic of the study institute. Sample collection and PRP injection was done by same orthopaedic doctor to avoid confounding bias. Collected sample processed at department of Pathology for preparation of PRP.

Blood sample prior to centrifugation and that of the sample obtained after centrifugation were put through 3 part NihonKohden Cell Counter and platelet count and platelet indices like MPV and PCT noted for evaluation. The improvement in patient condition was measured using WOMAC (12), VAS (13) and IKDC (14),(15).

PRP injection (Table/Fig 1): Two-three mL of PRP injections was injected on the patients at the study institute; every patient was given one injection. The patient’s position was supine with the knees extended.

Following patella and soft spot palpation, a landmark was formed by the collision of two imaginary lines: one from the superior border of the patella and one from the lateral border of the patella. The needle was directly aimed towards the anterior femoral cortex (Table/Fig 1).

Statistical Analysis

The data was analysed using paired t-test, Friedman Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Pearson’s correlation test.

Results

The maximum number (57.5%) of patients was between the age group of 50-59 years and the mean age of patients was 58.57±4.95 years. Out of 40 patients, 26 (65%) were females and 14 (35%) were males (Table/Fig 2).

Mean value of blood platelet count was lower as compared to the platelet count found in PRP. Mean of PRP MPV was more than the normal MPV value. Average value of PRP PCT was also more as found in normal blood PCT (Table/Fig 3). Mean±Standard Deviation (SD) of scores at the baseline and at all the follow-ups showed significant improvement (Friedman ANOVA test) (Table/Fig 4).

There was a significant correlation of platelet parameters WOMAC with Platelet count, VAS with MPV and IKDC with PCT (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

The OA, mostly seen in elderly patients, frequently affects the knee joint, with the advancement of diseases causing a major source of disability owing to pain and deformity (16). PRP treatment is a well-tolerated and minimally invasive technique, particularly in patients who are unfit for surgery or unable to take oral analgesics for an extended period of time.

There has been an increase in the use of PRP as a treatment modality in recent years. When platelets are activated, they release various growth factors and bioactive molecules that enhance the healing process (17). Platelets contain a high concentration of cytokines and growth factors, which stimulate cellular growth, vascularisation, proliferation, tissue regeneration, and collagen production.

Sánchez M et al., were the first to describe the importance of plasma-rich growth factors in treating articular cartilage avulsion in a soccer player (18). Few other studies found PRP to be effective in treating mild to moderate OA (1),(8),(9),(19),(20).

KL Grade used to define severity of disease, which was first described in 1957. Several modifications of the Kellgren and Lawrence classification system have been utilised in studies (21).

Below is the original description (21),(22),(10):

• Grade 0 (none): definite absence of X-ray changes of OA.
• Grade 1 (doubtful): doubtful joint space narrowing and possible osteophytic lipping.
• Grade 2 (minimal): definite osteophytes and possible joint space narrowing.
• Grade 3 (moderate): moderate multiple osteophytes, definite narrowing of joint space and some sclerosis and possible deformity of bone ends.
• Grade 4 (severe): large osteophytes, marked narrowing of joint space, severe sclerosis and definite deformity of bone ends.

This present study was directed to assess the clinical implication of intra-articular injection of PRP in mild and moderate knee OA (KL Grade 1 and 2 only) and to compare its clinical efficacy using VAS, IKDC and WOMAC scores.

Various studies on coagulation suggest its relationship with inflammation. So, coagulative parameters are utilised for diagnosis as well as prognosis purposes (23),(24). MPV suggests platelet size. In severe inflammation, the MPV value decreased, as per the study on rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis (25),(26). OA is a chronic inflammatory disease in which there is progressive destruction of cartilage and bone. The primary goal of the study was to correlate MPV and platelet value with OA stages. As diseases progress the value of MPV changes. Their value returns to normal after being treated with PRP. As a result, the diagnostic and prognostic role of MPV can be established in OA patients.

In the present study, the scores were noted at baseline (at the time of PRP injection) then at two and six month interval. The p-value from the baseline. At two months the improvement in functional outcome is not significant (p-value >0.05) in PRP, which is similar to studies done by UsluGüvendi E et al., and Patel A et al., (27),(28). However, at six months the improvement in functional outcome is significant (p-value <0.05) in the PRP group at six months which is also similar to studies done by UsluGüvendi E et al., and Patel A et al., (27),(28).

Various studies have shown that coagulative parameters like a platelet count study with Complete Blood Count (CBC) should be done at least before three months of PRP therapy to assess the potential predictive role of circulating platelets as well as identify any absolute contraindications [29-31]. However, the correlation between platelet count and clinical response is uncertain [29,32]. So this study focused mainly on the platelet count and its indices like MPV and PCT cell transplantation to determine their significance in PRP.

The amount of platelets injected into PRP determines the outcome. The present study also found some significant role of MPV and PCT on improvement of clinical outcome scores, which can be helpful in further larger scale research. Anti-inflammatory cytokines, as well as Platelet-derived Growth Factor (PDGF), Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-b), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) and Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), are released after platelet activation (33). PRP has an anabolic effect on cartilage tissue and chondrocyte metabolism [33-36].

Limitation(s)

The limitations of the present study were the small sample size and the follow-up period was brief. Unfortunately, the correlation between MPV and PCT and better OA scores was not quantified in the study. In order to minimise unnecessary procedures because of low MPV and PCT values, more research is needed to quantify the link.

Conclusion

Platelet count was found to have a statistically significant association with WOMAC, VAS, and IKDC in this study. Additionally, a statistically significant association was found between MPV and VAS. It can be concluded that in patients with knee OA of Grade 1 and 2, a treatment that consists of a single dosage of PRP injected intra-articular is beneficial, efficient, and cost-effective. Patients experience a reduction in pain and an increase in their range of flexion as a result of this treatment. As a result, it postpones the time when a total knee replacement is necessary, and in certain situations, it may even prevent it.

References

1.
Patel S, Dhillon MS, Aggarwal S, Marwaha N, Jain A. Treatment with platelet-rich plasma is more effective than placebo for knee osteoarthritis: A prospective, double-blind, randomized trial. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(2):356-64. PMID:23299850 [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Smith PA. Intra-articular autologous conditioned plasma injections provide safe and efficacious treatment for knee osteoarthritis: An FDA-sanctioned, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(4):884-91. PMID: 26831629. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/plateletrich-plasma-prp-treatment.
4.
Marx RE. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP): What is PRP and what is not PRP? Implant Dent. 2001;10(4):225-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200110000-00002. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Engebretsen L, Steffen K, Alsousou J, Anitua E, Bachl N, Devilee R, et al. IOC consensus paper on the use of platelet-rich plasma in sports medicine. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(15):1072-81. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2010.079822. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Magra M, Maffulli N. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in tendinopathy: Friend or foe. Clin J Sport Med. 2006;16(1):01-03. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jsm.0000194764.27819.5d. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Lana JF, Weglein A, Sampson SE, Vicente EF, Huber SC, Souza CV, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma and the combination of both in the treatment of mild and moderate osteoarthritis of the knee. Journal of Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine. 2016;12(2):69-78. https://doi.org/10.46582/jsrm.1202011. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Spaková T, Rosocha J, Lacko M, Harvanová D, Gharaibeh A. Treatment of knee joint osteoarthritis with autologous platelet-rich plasma in comparison with hyaluronic acid. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2012;91(5):411-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182aab72. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Say F, Gürler D, Yener K, Bülbül M, Malkoc M. Platelet-rich plasma injection is more effective than hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Actachirurgiaeorthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca. 2013;80(4):278-83. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24119476/. [crossref]
10.
Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND. Classifications in Brief: Kellgren-Lawrence Classification of Osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(8):1886-93. Doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4732-4. Epub 2016 Feb 12. PMID: 26872913; PMCID: PMC4925407.[crossref][PubMed]
11.
Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16:494-502. Doi: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Hmamouchi I, Allali F, Tahiri L, Khazzani H, Mansouri LE, Ali OuAlla S, et al. Clinically important improvement in the WOMAC and predictor factors for response to non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritic patients: A prospective study. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:58. Doi: 10.1186/1756- 0500-5-58. PMID: 22269793; PMCID: PMC3283484. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF- 36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:S240-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20543. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Wright RW. Osteoarthritis Classification Scales: Interobserver reliability and arthroscopic correlation. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2014;96(14):1145- 51. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00929. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, Crossley KM, Roots EM. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(Suppl 11)(0 11):S208-28. https://doi. org/10.1002/acr.20632. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Dhillon MS, Patel S, John R. PRP in OA knee-update, current confusions and future options. SICOT-J. 2017;3:27. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Lozada JL, Caplanis N, Proussaefs P, Willardsen J, Kammeyer G. Platelet-rich plasma application in sinus graft surgery: Part I--Background and processing techniques. The Journal of Oral Implantology. 2001;27(1):38-42. https://doi. org/10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0038:PPAISG>2.3.CO;2. 2.3.CO;2>[crossref][PubMed]
18.
Sánchez M, Anitua E, Orive G, Mujika I, Andia I. Platelet-rich therapies in the treatment of orthopaedic sport injuries. Sports Med. 2009;39(5):345-54. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Sampson S, Reed M, Silvers H, Meng M, Mandelbaum B. Injection of platelet rich plasma in patients with primary and secondary knee osteoarthritis: A pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(12):961-69. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Kon E, Buda R, Filardo G, Di Martino A, Timoncini A, Cenacchi A, et al. Platelet-rich plasma: Intra-articular knee injections produced favorable results on degenerative cartilage lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(4):472-79. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Schiphof D, Boers M, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Differences in descriptions of kellgren and lawrence grades of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(7):1034- 36. Doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.079020. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Kellgren J, Lawrence J. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(4):494-502. Doi: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Foley JH, Conway EM. Cross talk pathways between coagulation and inammation. Circ Res. 2016;118(9):1392-408. Doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.306853. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Levi M, van der Poll T. Coagulation and sepsis. Thromb Res. 2017;149:38-44. Doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.11.007. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Kisaci B, Tufan A, Kalyoncu U, Karadag O, Akdogan A, Ozturk MA, et al. Mean platelet volume (MPV) as an inflammatory marker in ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75(3):291-94. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.06.016. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Tekeog? lu I ?, Gürol G, Harman H, Karakeçe E, Çiftçi I?H. Overlooked hematological markers of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases. 2016;19(11):1078-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.12805. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
UsluGüvendi E, As¸ kin A, Güvendi G, Koçyig? it H. Comparison of efficiency between corticosteroid and platelet rich plasma injection therapies in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Rheumatol. 2018;33(3):273-81. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Patel A, Gautam V, Vora P. Comparative study of short term outcome of patients with knee osteoarthritis treated with platelet rich plasma and Triamcinolone. A prospective, randomised, double blind study. Journal for Research Analysis. 2019;8(2):2277-8160.
29.
Louis ML, Magalon J, Jouve E, Bornet CE, Mattei JC, Chagnaud C, et al. Growth factors levels determine efficacy of platelets rich plasma injection in knee osteoarthritis: A randomized double blind non inferiority trial compared with visco supplementation. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery: Official Publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. 2018;34(5):1530-40.e2. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.035. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Qiao J, An N, Ouyang X. Quantification of growth factors in different platelet concentrates. Platelets. 2017;28(8):774-78. Doi: 10.1080/09537104.2016.1267338. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Taniguchi Y, Yoshioka T, Sugaya H, Gosho M, Aoto K, Kanamori A, et al. Growth factor levels in leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma and correlations with donor age, gender, and platelets in the Japanese population. J Exp Orthop. 2019;6(1):4. Published 2019 Feb 2. Doi: 10.1186/s40634-019-0175-7. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Dernek B, Kesiktas FN, Duymus TM, Aydin T, Isiksacan N, Diracoglu D, et al. Effect of platelet concentration on clinical improvement in treatment of early stage-knee osteoarthritis with platelet-rich plasma concentrations. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(5):896-901. Doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.896 [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Chouhan DK, Dhillon MS, Patel S, Bansal T, Bhatia A, Kanwat H. Multiple platelet-rich plasma injections versus single platelet-rich plasma injection in early osteoarthritis of the knee: An experimental study in a guinea pig model of early knee osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(10):2300-07. Doi: 10.1177/0363546519856605. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Fice MP, Miller JC, Christian R, Hannon CP, Smyth N, Murawski CD, et al. The role of platelet-rich plasma in cartilage pathology: An updated systematic review of the basic science evidence. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(3):961-76.e3. Doi:10.1016/j. arthro.2018.10.125 [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Liu X, Wang L, Ma C, Wang G, Zhang Y, Sun S. Exosomes derived from platelet- rich plasma present a novel potential in alleviating knee osteoarthritis by promoting proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis of chondrocyte via Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2019;14(1):470. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1529-7. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Moussa M, Lajeunesse D, Hilal G, El Atat O, Haykal G, Serhal R, et al. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) induces chondroprotection via increasing autophagy, anti-inflammatory markers, and decreasing apoptosis in human osteoarthritic cartilage. Exp Cell Res. 2017;352(1):146-56. Doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.02.012.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60551.17816

Date of Submission: Oct 03, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 19, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Feb 16, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 04, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 11, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 15, 2023 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com