Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 82419

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : AE01 - AE06 Full Version

Literature Review on Morphology and Morphometry of Foramen Ovale in Indian Skulls


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61440.17941
Manickam Subramanian, Yoganandham Janani, Jyothi Ashok Kumar, Senthiappan Mariappan Arathi

1. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Bhaarath Medical College and Hospital, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Basaveshwara Medical College and Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka, India. 4. Professor, Department of Anatomy, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Senthiappan Mariappan Arathi,
Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: drarathi.ms@gmail.com

Abstract

Foramen ovale is seen in the base of the skull connecting the infratemporal fossa and middle cranial fossa. Knowledge of the exact location and dimensions of foramen ovale is essential for trigeminal rhizotomy, electroencephalogram of the temporal lobe and endonasal endoscopic trans-sphenoidal approach to the infratemporal fossa. In this literature review, articles reporting morphology, morphometry, and variations of foramen ovale in Indian skulls from standard databases between 1979 and 2022 were selected. The sample size ranged between 20 and 250 skulls. The common shape observed was oval (96.9%) and duplication of foramen ovale was seen commonly on the right-side. The presence of accessory bony structures, namely spine, tubercle, spur, septa and bar was reported but was difficult to compare due to a lack of uniform classification. The length, breadth, and area of foramen ovale ranged from 5.0-8.9 mm, 3.1-6.0 mm, and 19.1-34.2 mm2, respectively. In the majority of the studies, no significant difference was observed in these parameters between the sides and between the sexes. These data will be useful while attempting surgical or invasive procedures in the skull base of Indian subjects and help to avoid damage to the structures passing through the foramen ovale and the resulting complications.

Keywords

Anatomy, Duplication, Measurements, Variations

The human skull protects the brain and permits it to communicate with other structures. Even though skulls appear similar within a species, they are not identical. Many variations can be observed in the skulls belonging to different populations, age groups and sexes (1). This intrigues and inspires scientists till date to revisit the skull for further investigation. Among the various structures, the foramina present in the skull are studied for their morphology, morphometry, and variations. Amidst the numerous foramina, foramen ovale is an oval-shaped passage seen in the greater wing of the sphenoid bone with foramen spinosum present posterolateral to it and foramen lacerum present medial to it (2). Foramen ovale transmits the mandibular nerve, emissary vein, accessory meningeal artery, and lesser petrosal nerve. The exact location and dimensions of the foramen ovale play a vital role as a landmark in endonasal endoscopic transpterygoid approach to the infratemporal fossa, parapharyngeal space, and lateral skull base and help during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures like temporal lobe encephalogram, a percutaneous biopsy of parasellar lesions, percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomy (3). Knowledge of topography and variations of the foramen ovale will enable clinicians to avoid feasible injury and resulting complications to structures passing through the foramen ovale and in its vicinity by avoiding multiple attempts during cannulation of the foramen (4).

There is plenty of literature available on the morphology and morphometry of foramen ovale on Indian population. Each study has been carried out in a particular population of Indian subcontinent with widely varying sample size. Few selective morphometric parameters were studied in addition to the variations of foramen ovale. However, there is no uniformity in parameters studied and terminologies used to describe the accessory bony structure. There is no review available pooling the available data to arrive at an informed decision about the morphometry of foramen ovale in Indian population. Therefore, the present study reviews the morphology, morphometry, and variations of foramen ovale and its related accessory bony structures reported in the Indian population. This review would be of use to clinicians to plan the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and researchers to compare the Indian data on foramen ovale with other races.

Literature Search

Articles on foramen ovale were searched in the following databases: PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar between 1979 and 2022. Case reports and review articles were excluded from the study. Studies employing adult Indian dry skulls were included in the study. The place of study, sample size, instruments used for measurement, and the statistical methods employed were recorded. Morphological features namely shape and symmetry and variations like duplication of the foramen, and the presence of accessory bony structures (spine, tubercle, plate, spur, septa, and bar) reported in the studies were tabulated for comparison. Morphometric parameters of foramen ovale, namely length, width, and the area reported in the studies were tabulated. These data were carefully analysed for their concordance and for the presence of possible discordance.

Development of foramen ovale: Foramen transmits structures in and out of the skull. During embryological development, foramina present in the base of the skull are formed in species-specific topographical locations by endochondral ossification surrounding the developing neural or vascular structures. The size, shape and area of the foramina suggest the functional status of the neurovascular structures passing through them (5). Evolutionarily, the foramen ovale is acquired during the maturation of the mammalian embryo, and the trigeminal ganglion exists as an extracranial structure until the development of the foramen ovale (6).

During development, a true foramen ovale for the passage of the mandibular nerve develops as the nerve courses between the internal carotid artery and the stapedial artery in the greater wing of the sphenoid. The foramen ovale starts as a groove, later forms a notch and ends up in a foramen (7). Therefore, in humans, the foramen ovale is located on the greater wing of the sphenoid bone. All existing literature reported the presence of foramen ovale bilaterally. Except for two studies, each reported one case of unilateral absence of foramen ovale on the right-side (8) and the left-side (9).

Geographical data: A review of the literature revealed 44 studies on foramen ovale using adult skulls of Indian origin ranging from the year 1979 to 2022. The maximum number of studies were reported in the years 2014 and 2017 (n=6). Among the different states and union territories of India, maximum studies were reported from Karnataka (n=seven) (2),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13),(14), followed by Tamil Nadu (n=six) (15),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20) and Maharashtra (n=five) (8),(21),(22),(23),(24). Three studies each came from Gujarat (25),(26),(27) and Kerala (28),(29),(30). Two studies were reported from Andhra Pradesh (31),(32), Delhi (33),(34), Punjab (35),(36), Uttar Pradesh (37),(38) and West Bengal (39),(40). One study each from Bihar (41), Jammu and Kashmir (42), Jharkhand (43), Madhya Pradesh (44), Odisha (45), Pondicherry (46), Rajasthan (47), Sikkim (48) and Telangana (49) was published. One article did not explicitly stated the state from which the bones were collected other than mentioning it as of South Indian (50) origin (Table/Fig 1).

Sample size: Study samples ranged from a minimum of 20 skulls (42) to a maximum of 250 skulls (50). There were around 13 studies with less than 50 samples (14),(15),(16),(17),(19),(31),(36),(37),(39),(40),(41),(42),(43), 16 studies with a sample size between 50 and 100 (2),(9),(13),(18),(21),(22),(25),(29),(30),(34),(35),(38),(45),(47),(48),(49) and 13 studies with a sample size between 100 and 150 [8,10-12,20,23,24,26-28,32,33,46]. There were two studies (44),(50) each with 200 and 250 samples (Table/Fig 1). All these studies were carried out on dry skulls and the usage of imaging modalities was scarce. A study done by Gupta T and Gupta SK was the only exception where X-rays of dry adult skulls were used for recording the measurements between foramen ovale and various anatomical landmarks to aid in intraoperative radiological imaging (35). A large number of studies had sample sizes between 250 and 100 skulls. This could be ascribed to the mandatory National Medical Commission’s (formerly Medical Council of India) requirement of 37 (Articulated skeleton-7, Disarticulated-30 sets) and 51 (Articulated skeleton-11, Disarticulated-40 sets) skulls for the admission of 150 and 250 students respectively in Indian medical schools (51),(52).

Instruments employed: A divider and ruler, a vernier caliper, a digital vernier caliper and computerised software were used for measurement. A study done by Kumar A et al., used photography and Image J software for measurement (34). Among various studies, variations observed between similar parameters may be due to the difference in the accuracy level of the instrument used. Therefore, employing imaging modalities or computerised software will be beneficial to obtain precise and consistent results.

Shape of foramen ovale: Various shapes of foramen ovale are reported. Namely-oval, almond, round, D-shaped, elongated, slit-like, triangular, irregular, semilunar, elliptical, pear shaped, comma shaped and kidney shaped. In accordance with the name, oval shape is the most common shape ranging as high as 96.9% (18). However, a study by Daimi S et al., reported 46.2% of D-shaped foramen ovale (21). Studies reported the decreasing frequency of shape of foramen ovale in the following order: Oval>Almond>Round (Table/Fig 1). The asymmetrical size and shape of the foramen ovale between the right and left-sides were attributed to the asymmetry of the emissary veins connecting the cavernous sinus and pterygoid venous plexus (53),(54). It could be the plausible reason for the various shapes observed in the foramen ovale.

Duplication of foramen ovale: The duplication of foramen ovale reported in the literature is shown in (Table/Fig 2). Five studies reported the occurrence of duplication of foramen ovale with a higher frequency on the right-side. Irrespective of the side, the occurrence ranged from 0.5-32.5%. Though duplication of foramen ovale was reported in both juvenile and adult skulls, chances for ossification of fibrous bands between the vein and other structures in the foramen ovale increases with age. This postulate by Patil GV et al., probably explains the occurrence of duplication in these adult skulls (28).

Accessory bony structures: Regarding the accessory bony structures, namely spine, tubercle, plate, spur, septa and bar, there was no uniformity in reporting their occurrence. There was no clear protocol to classify the bony projection as spine, spur and tubercle. Similarly, plate, septa and bar also lack clear distinction. As a result, various researchers could label the same bony structure differently. The available data is exhibited in (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4).

The occurrence of bony spine ranged between 1.7% (36) and 13.3% (16), bony tubercle ranged between 3.1% (13) and 8.0% (23) and bony plate between 0.5% (46) and 38.0% (38). The occurrence of bony spur ranged between 0.5% (8) and 47.5% (19) and bony septum between 0.5% (27) and 7.5% (19). One study by Kumar A et al., reported the presence of a bony bar (2%) (34).

The foramen ovale is located in the greater wing of the sphenoid. During development, primitive foramen lacerum medius present between the alisphenoid, the basisphenoid, and the petrous bone is found to accommodate the mandibular nerve within a sunken notch in its proximity (55). This primitive foramen lacerum medius transforms to foramen ovale (56). The epigenetic play of genetically determined growth processes of surrounding muscles, vessels and nerves influencing bone formation may have resulted in variations in the shape and the presence of accessory bony structures in the foramen ovale (57). Further, structures passing through the foramen ovale might be separated by dense fibrous connective tissues. These fibrous bands might occasionally ossify, creating duplications of foramen ovale or may present as lamina or bony septum dividing the foramen into compartments of unequal sizes (38).

The presence of accessory bony structures such as bony spurs, and ossified ligaments in the vicinity of the foramen ovale leads to the narrowing of the foramen resulting in entrapment neuropathy and venous blood flow restriction in the emissary vein leading to ischaemia of the trigeminal ganglion. It also interferes with diagnostic or therapeutic procedures like percutaneous biopsy of parasellar lesions, percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomy performed in that region (58).

Morphometry: Regarding the morphometry of the foramen ovale, the most common measurements made were the length and width of the foramen ovale. Of the 44 Indian studies, except four (16),(28),(33),(42) 40 studies recorded these measurements. Seven studies (10),(11),(13),(19),(29),(39),(44) calculated the area of foramen ovale using the following Radinsky’s formula (59).

(Where, π=3.1, L is the length and B is the width of foramen ovale)

However, Kumar A et al., used the Image J software for calculating the area (34). Few studies had estimated the distance between foramen ovale and various other anatomical landmarks like the anterior root of the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, zygomatic point, foramen lacerum and foramen spinosum. The significance of these landmarks and their distance from foramen ovale are out of the scope of this review, these landmarks help in placing radiological markers to gain easy access to the foramen and in placing the electrodes during electroencephalography and treatment of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

Very few studies (11),(23),(34),(37),(38),(50) had considered the sex of the skulls for analysis. Though there were slight differences between the measurements of male and female skulls they were not statistically significant in most of the studies (11),(23),(37),(50) except two (34),(38). Mishra SR et al., (38) and Kumar A et al.,(34) reported that female had significantly higher dimensions and lower area than males, respectively. Only one study used these measurements to predict the sex of the skulls (11). They have predicted that if the area of foramen ovale was greater than 34.5 mm2, then it was a male skull and if it is less than 31.6 mm2, then it was a female skull. Only one study has considered the age of the skulls and found that duplication of foramen ovale was seen only in skulls aged above 40 years (4.29%) and not in younger skulls (28).

The mean length of the foramen ovale ranged between 5.0 (millimetre) mm and 8.9 mm (Table/Fig 5) [32,50]. Only two studies reported the right-side being significantly longer than the left [11,47]. One study reported females had significantly longer foramen than males (38). Likewise, the mean width of the foramen ovale ranged between 3.1 mm [23,45] and 6.0 mm (14) (Table/Fig 5). Only two studies reported the right-side being significantly wider than the left [11,47]. One study reported that males had significantly wider foramen than females (38). The area of foramen ovale ranged between 19.1 mm2 and 34.2 mm2 (Table/Fig 5). Only two studies reported significant differences [34,44]. One study showed the area was higher on the left-side with a male preponderance (34). The other reported the foramen ovale with a higher area on the right-side (44). These observations reveal the existence of a wide range in terms of morphometric parameters. However, researchers suggest to suspect trigeminal neurinoma and parasellar tumours in case of foramen ovale larger than the normal range as the tumour growth is associated with the erosion of bone (60).

Liu P et al., found that in trigeminal neuralgia patients without any vascular compressions, the foramen ovale was narrow on the affected side (58). It reveals that even if the morphometric difference between the sides may not be statistically significant, it can be clinically relevant. Further, to perform a successful trigeminal ganglion block, the shape and size of the foramen ovale are considered the key factors. It is reported that puncturing foramen ovale would be difficult if the width is less than three millimetres (61).

Statistics used in studies: Most studies used Student’s t-test to analyse the differences between the right and left-sides and between males and females of metric parameters (2),(12),(13),(17),(20),(29),(30),(37),(38),(43),(44),(46),(62). Only one study used Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for statistical analysis (34). Only three studies used Pearson’s correlation coefficient to calculate the association between different parameters (13),(19),(39). Two studies found a strong positive correlation between length as well as width and the area of foramen ovale on both sides (19),(39). However, Somesh M et al., found positive correlation between length and area and found no correlation between width and the area of foramen ovale (13).

Clinical significance: Foramen ovale is a communication between the middle cranial fossa and the infratemporal fossa. Its position helps in approaching the intracranial structures percutaneously through the transjugular-transovale route of Härtel (63). The method introduced by Mullan and Lichtor employs introduction of 14G needle through the foramen ovale and then introduction of Fogharty 4F balloon catheter to perform percutaneous balloon compression in the treatment of Trigeminal neuralgia. Anatomical variations such as spines, tubercles, and bony plates on the margins of the foramen ovale make cannulation difficult (64). In similar lines, the knowledge of shape and size of the foramen ovale is essential during cannulation in percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomy, a percutaneous biopsy of parasellar lesions and an electroencephalogram of the temporal lobe in selective amygdalo-hippocampectomy (65).

The mandibular nerve at the level of foramen ovale serves as a landmark in the endonasal endoscopic transpterygoid approach to the infratemporal fossa, parapharyngeal space, and lateral skull base. This approach was reported to be helpful in the management of schwannomas and juvenile angiofibromas in the infratemporal fossa (3). Morphological differences such as small foramen or foramen with accessory bony structures were outlined as contributing factors causing difficulty in cannulating foramen ovale with a routine 14G needle having an outer diameter of 2.1 mm (64). Difficulty during cannulation was reported to result in multiple attempts of cannulation and failure. Multiple attempts were associated with vascular complications such as formation of haematoma, intracranial haemorrhage and carotid-cavernous fistula (4),(65).

Currently these invasive procedures are performed with the help of computed tomography and other navigation technology. However, these are not free from risks. It is reported that there is 5% overall failure rate of cannulation (64). Improper cannulation was reported to cause blindness, brain stem haematoma, cavernous sinus puncture and carotid artery haemorrhage (63). Therefore, knowledge of morphological variations is vital in addition to understanding the topography and morphometry of foramen ovale to perform diagnostic and surgical procedures. Realising the presence of these variants is essential to understand the regional anatomy. Failure to recognise these variants can lead to misinterpretation during surgical intervention resulting in trauma to the adjacent neurovascular structures.

In total, data on foramen ovale from 3,266 skulls were reported from these 44 studies. Knowledge of morphology and morphometry of foramen ovale will be a valuable resource to clinicians to plan surgical procedures on Indian subjects. Further, awareness about the presence of accessory bony structures concerning foramen ovale necessitates a thorough radiological investigation of the area to evaluate the occurrence of any variation before maxillofacial or skull base surgery (66). The prior knowledge and preoperative evaluation will avert multiple attempts and failure of cannulating foramen ovale and thereby minimise surgical complications. In addition, these data can be compared with other populations, and attempts can be made to develop a repository of morphometric data on foramen ovale.

Limitation(s)

The skeletal or osteological collections in Indian medical schools are not from documented human cadavers. Therefore, Indian studies suffer from limitations like a lack of demographic details, such as age, sex and race. Except for a few studies, most studies included in this review also suffer from these constraints (8),(11),(23),(28),(34),(37),(38),(50). The readers need to be cautious about these limitations while considering these data.

Conclusion

This review presents morphological and morphometric data on foramen ovale of 3,266 Indian skulls. Much of these data lacks demographic details such as age and sex due to lack of documentation of human cadavers. Though various shapes were reported, oval was the most common shape. Duplication of foramen ovale was found more common on right-side and its occurrence can be high irrespective of the side. Accessory bony structures related to foramen ovale were reported with no uniform nomenclature leading to difficulty in comprehending the structures and their comparison. Nevertheless, occurrence of accessory bony structures is well documented and could be a possible cause for reduction in the size of foramen ovale. Therefore, in the light of available literature, surgeons should be cautious while surgically approaching the foramen ovale of Indian adult males especially on the right-side. Occurrence of foraminal duplication and accessory bony structures could be the possible risk factors reducing the dimensions of foramen ovale and making performance of procedures like percutaneous cannulation difficult. These data shall create awareness about the morphology and variations of foramen ovale among the clinicians and can be used for comparative analysis with other populations.

References

1.
Relethford JH. Race and global patterns of phenotypic variation. Am J Phys Antropol. 2009;139(1):16-22. Epub 2009/02/20. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Patil J, Kumar N, Mohandas Rao K, Swamy Ravindra S. The foramen ovale morphometry of sphenoid bone in South Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(12):2668-70. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Youssef A, Carrau RL, Tantawy A, Ibrahim AA, Prevedello DM, Otto BA, et al. Clinical correlates of the anatomical relationships of the foramen ovale: A radioanatomical study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2014;75(6):427. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Bohnstedt BN, Tubbs RS, Cohen-Gadol AA. The use of intraoperative navigation for percutaneous procedures at the skull base including a difficult-to-access foramen ovale. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(2 Suppl Operative):177-80. Epub 2011/08/09. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
McGonnell IM, Akbareian SE. Like a hole in the head: Development, evolutionary implications and diseases of the cranial foramina. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019;91:23-30. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Edinger T, Kitts DB. The foramen ovale. Evolution. 1954;8(4):389-404. [crossref]
7.
Wood-Jones F. The non-metrical morphological characters of the skull as criteria for racial diagnosis: Part I: General discussion of the morphological characters employed in racial diagnosis. J Anat. 1931;65(Pt 2):179-95.
8.
Kulkarni S, Nikade V. A morphometric study of foramen ovale and foramen spinosum in dried Indian human skulls. Int J Recent Trends Sci Tech. 2013;7:74-75.
9.
Ashwini NS, Venkateshu KV. Morphometric and morphological analysis of foramen ovale in dry human skulls. Int J Anat Res. 2017;5(1):3547-51. [crossref]
10.
Desai S, Shaik HS, Shepur MP, Thomas S, Mavishettar G, Haseena S. Morphometric analysis of Foramen ovale. J Pharma Sci Res. 2012;4(7):1870-71.
11.
Ahmed MM, Jeelani M, Tarnum A. Anthropometry: A comparative study of right and left-sided foramen ovale, jugular foramen and carotid canal. Int J Scientific Study. 2015;3(05):88-94.
12.
Poornima B, Sampada P, Mallikarjun M, Santosh B. Morphometric and morphological study of foramen ovale in dry adult human skull bones. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol. 2017;4(1):59-62.
13.
Somesh M, Sridevi H, Prabhu LV, Swamy M, Krishnamurthy A, Murlimanju B, et al. A morphometric study of foramen ovale. Turk Neurosurg. 2011;21(3):378-83. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Srikantaiah VC, Shetty H. Anthropometric evaluation of foramen ovale in adult dry skulls of the Mysuru-based population. J Morph Sci. 2019;36(01):14-16. [crossref]
15.
Ravinthar K, Thenmozhi. Morphometric study of size and symmetry of foramen ovale in dry skulls. J Pharma Sci Res. 2015;7(10):830-33.
16.
John DA, Thenmozhi. Anatomical variations of foramen ovale. J Pharma Sci Res. 2015;7(6):327-29.
17.
Devi K, Thenmozhi M. A study on morphology, morphomertric and duplication of the foramen ovale in human skulls of South Indian population. Indian J App Res. 2016;6(7):01-03.
18.
Sankaran P, Raghunath G, Arathala R, Karthikeyan, Menaka, Madhumitha, et al. Morphological study of middle cranial fossa and its variations. Int J Pharma Sci Res. 2018;9(2):693-701.
19.
Yoganandham J MS, Senthiappan AM, Subramanian M, Bandlamudi S, Chandrasekaran SP. Comparative analysis of metric and nonmetric aspects of foramen ovale of South Indian population with various regions globally and its approach through zygomatic route. Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth. 2023;16(2):244-54.
20.
Punitha Rani M. Morphological and morphometric study of foramen ovale and foramen spinosum in adult human dry skulls. Chennai: The Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University; 2018. Thesis.
21.
Daimi S, Siddiqui AU, Gill S. Analysis of foramen ovale with special emphasis on pterygoalar bar and pterygoalar foramen. Folia Morphol. 2011;70(3):149-53.
22.
Sharma NA, Garud RS. Morphometric evaluation and a report on the aberrations of the foramina in the intermediate region of the human cranial base: A study of an Indian population. Eur J Anat. 2011;15(3):140-49.
23.
Karan B, Surekha D, Umarji B, Patil R, Ambali M. Foramen ovale and foramen spinosum: A morphometric study. Anatomica Karnataka. 2012;6(3):68-72.
24.
Khairnar KB, Bhusari PA. An anatomical study on the foramen ovale and the foramen spinosum. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(3):427-29. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Agarwal D, Gupta S. Morphometeric analysis of foramen ovale and foramen spinosum of human sphenoid bone in the south gujarat population: Vital for medical practitioners in cases of trigeminal neuralgia. J Adv Res Med Sci. 2012;4:243-45.
26.
Raval BB, Singh PR, Rajguru J. Morphology and morphometry of foramen ovale and foramen spinosum in dry adult human skulls and its clinical significance. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 2015;9(2):108-14. [crossref]
27.
Patel R, Mehta C. Morphometry of foramen ovale at base of skull in Gujarat. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2014;13:26-30. [crossref]
28.
Patil GV, Apoorva D, Sharif J, Sheshgiri C, Sushant N. The duplication of the foramen ovale in human skulls of south Indian population. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2014;3(41):10249-54. [crossref]
29.
Prakash KG, Saniya K, Honnegowda TM, Ramkishore HS, Nautiyal A. Morphometric and anatomic variations of foramen ovale in human skull and its clinical importance. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019;14(4):1134-37. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Patil G, Shishirkumar AD. Morphometry of the foramen ovale of sphenoid bone in human dry skulls in Kerala. Int J Health Sci Res. 2014;4:90-93.
31.
Sridhar S, Jayasree N, Chidambaram S, Vetrayan V. Morphometric observations in foramen ovale (FO) and foramen spinosum (FS) of human sphenoid bones in Andhra Pradesh populations. Journal of Head and Neck Physicians and Surgeons. 2014;3(1):18-28.
32.
Hema L. Anatomical variants of foramen ovale and foramen spinosum. J Anat Soc India. 2017;66:S66-S7. [crossref]
33.
Jain K, Jain B. Asymmetry in the skull. Acta Anat. 1979;104(3):349-52. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Kumar A, Sehgal R, Roy T. A morphometric analysis and study of variations of foramina in the floor of the middle cranial fossa. J Anat Soc India. 2016;65(2):143-47. [crossref]
35.
Gupta T, Gupta SK. Original landmarks for intraoperative localization of the foramen ovale: A radio-anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34(8):767-72. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Wadhwa A, Sharma M, Kaur P. Anatomic variations of foramen ovale-clinical implications. Int J Basic App Med Sci. 2012;2:21-24.
37.
Gupta N, Rai AL. Foramen ovale-morphometry and its surgical importance. Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Science. 2013;3(1):04-06.
38.
Mishra SR, Sushobhana, Singh S, Singh R, Gaharwar A. Morphometric and topographic study of foramen ovale in Indian skulls. Malaysian J Med Biol Res. 2016;3(2):75-84. [crossref]
39.
Srimani P, Mukherjee P, Sarkar M, Roy H, Sengupta SK, Sarkar AN, et al. Foramina in alisphenoid-Observational study on their osseomorphology and morphometry. Int J Anat Radiol Sur. 2014;3(1):01-06.
40.
Das S, Bhattacharjee S, Pal S. A morphometric study of foramen ovale. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol. 2019;6(3):359-62. [crossref]
41.
Kumar B, Sinha RR, Kumar S, Akhtar MJ, Ratnesh R, Kumar A, et al. Morphometric study of foramen ovale in human skull in population of Bihar. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2018;17(3):40-43.
42.
Naqshi B, Shah A, Gupta S. Variations in foramen ovale and foramen spinosum in human skulls of north indian population. Int J Cont Med Res. 2017;4(11):2262-65.
43.
Chanda C, Ranjan R, Prasad R, Baghel AS, Bhujade R. Morphometric and topographic assessment of foramen ovale in skulls of Jharkhand population. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2020;9(4):211-16. [crossref]
44.
Lakshmi KNV, Gajbhiye VM. Foramen ovale-Morphometric and morphological assessment in human adult neurocranium. Paripex-Indian J Res. 2019;8(7):30-31.
45.
Saurjyaranjan D, Sreepreeti C, Gyanaranjan N. An anatomical study of foramen ovale with clinical implications. Int J Anat Res. 2018;6(4.2):5921-25. [crossref]
46.
Shankar G, Muthukumaravel N. A morphological and morphometric study of foramen ovale in dry skulls of Indian population. Nat J Clin Anat. 2019;8(1):38-42. [crossref]
47.
Katara P, Dadhich A, Saxena A, Sharma S, Sharma D. Morphological and morphometric study of foramen ovale and foramen spinosum in human skull. Int J Med Res Professionals. 2020;6(2):94-96.
48.
Chandra Philips X, Bilodi AKS. A study on foramen ovale in human skulls. Indian J Med Case Rep. 2013;2(04):65-76.
49.
Rao BS, Yesender M, Vinila BS. Morphological variations and morphometric analysis of foramen ovale with its clinical implications. Int J Anat Res. 2017;5(1):3394-97. [crossref]
50.
Murugan M, Saheb SH. Morphometric and morphological study on foramen ovale. Int J Anat Res. 2014;2(4):664-67. [crossref]
52.
Minimum requirement for 150 admissions. [homepage on Internet]: National Medical Commission; 2020 [cited 2022 January 22]; Available from: https:// www.nmc.org.in/information-desk/for-colleges/procedure-to-start-new-college.
52.
Minimum requirement for 200 admissions. [homepage on Internet]: National Medical Commission; 2020 [cited 2022 January 22]; Available from: https:// www.nmc.org.in/information-desk/for-colleges/procedure-to-start-new-college.
53.
Lindblom K. A roentgenographic study of the vascular channels of the skull: With special reference to intracranial tumors and arterio-venous aneurysms. Sweden: Norstedt; 1936.
54.
Henderson W. A note on the relationship of the human maxillary nerve to the cavernous sinus and to an emissary sinus passing through the foramen ovale. J Anat. 1966;100(Pt 4):905-08.
55.
Shapiro R, Robinson F. The foramina of the middle fossa: a phylogenetic, anatomic and pathologic study. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1967;101(4):779-94. [crossref][PubMed]
56.
Ginsberg LE, Pruett SW, Chen M, Elster AD. Skull-base foramina of the middle cranial fossa: Reassessment of normal variation with high-resolution CT. Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15(2):283-91.
57.
Hauser G, De Stefano GF, Bastianini A, Bertelli L. Epigenetic variants of the human skull. Stuttgart, Germany: Schweizerbart Science Publishers; 1989.
58.
Liu P, Zhong W, Liao C, Liu M, Zhang W. Narrow foramen ovale and rotundum: A role in the etiology of trigeminal neuralgia. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(8):2168-70. [crossref][PubMed]
59.
Natsis K, Repousi E, Sofidis G, Piagkou M. The osseous structures in the infratemporal fossa: Foramen ovale, bony spurs, ossified ligaments and their contribution to the trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157(1):101-03. [crossref][PubMed]
60.
Palacios E, MacGee EE. The radiographic diagnosis of trigeminal neurinomas. J Neurosurg. 1972;36(2):153-56. Epub 1972/02/01. [crossref][PubMed]
61.
Pang J, Hou S, Liu M, Feng H, Zu L, Guo Y, et al. Puncture of foramen ovale cranium in computed tomography three-dimensional reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(5):1457-59. Epub 2012/09/15. [crossref][PubMed]
62.
Agarwal DR, Gupta SB. A morphometeric analysis of foramen ovale and foramen spinosum of human sphenoid bone in the south Gujarat population: Vital for medical practitioners in cases of trigeminal neuralgia. J Adv Res Med Sci. 2012;4:243-45.
63.
Zdilla MJ, Fijalkowski KM. The shape of the foramen ovale: A visualization aid for cannulation procedures. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(2):548-51. [crossref][PubMed]
64.
Barlas O, Unal TC. A technique to facilitate the cannulation of the foramen ovale for balloon compression. Br J Neurosurg. 2021:01-04. Epub 2021/03/31.
65.
Zdilla MJ, Hatfield SA, McLean KA, Cyrus LM, Laslo JM, Lambert HW. Circularity, solidity, axes of a best fit ellipse, aspect ratio, and roundness of the foramen ovale: A morphometric analysis with neurosurgical considerations. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(1):222. [crossref][PubMed]
66.
Antonopoulou M, Piagou M, Anagnostopoulou S. An anatomical study of the pterygospinous and pterygoalar bars and foramina-their clinical relevance. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;36(2):104-08.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61440.17941

Date of Submission: Nov 13, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 03, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Mar 10, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 17, 2022
• Manual Googling: Feb 07, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 23, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com