Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 18474

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : VC01 - VC04 Full Version

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Escalating Intravenous Infusions of Lignocaine and Ketamine in Reducing Pain and Disability for Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Study


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63605.17779
GS Ashwini, RS Deepak, Mruthyunjaya Nagaraj, K Bhavyashree

1. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Basaveshwara Medical College and Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Basaveshwara Medical College and Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, SS Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Davanagere, Karnataka, India. 4. Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Basaveshwara Medical College and Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. RS Deepak,
Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Basaveshwara Medical College and Hospital, Chitradurga-577502, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: dr.dpuk@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Fibromyalgia is a chronic syndrome characterised by widespread musculoskeletal pain accompanied by fatigue, disability, sleep, memory and mood issues. The pain of fibromyalgia is difficult to manage and has no complete remission. While there is no cure for fibromyalgia, a variety of medications have been tried to minimise symptoms and improve general health. Hence, a trial was conducted to evaluate lignocaine and ketamine as pharmacological modalities to treat fibromyalgia.

Aim: To evaluate effectiveness of intravenous (i.v.) lignocaine-ketamine infusions in reducing pain and disability in fibromyalgia syndrome.

Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at Basaveshwara Medical College and Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka, India, between March 2021 and March 2022, on patients aged between 18-60 years diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome. Sixty patients were included in the study. Escalating doses of i.v. lignocaine of 5 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg and 7 mg/kg followed by escalating doses of i.v. ketamine of 0.4 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg and 0.6 mg/kg were administered on alternate days over a period of 12 days. Infusions were given in 50 mL normal saline through syringe pump over a period of 45 minutes. Pre and postinfusion 11 point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score was used to assess pain and World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 score to assess disability. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation. Statistical analysis was done by using the t-test for pre and post-treatment score, with a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The present study showed female predominance of 42 out of 60 patients (70%) compared to males 18 out of 60 (30%). Pretreatment average baseline NRS score was 8.8. The mean reduction in NRS scores after lignocaine-ketamine infusions at the end of one month was 1.40 and at sixth month 1.25 which was statistically significant (p-value=0.001). Pretreatment mean average disability score was 2.70 and at the end of sixth month it was 0.59 which was statistically significant (p-value=0.001). Three patients did not show reduction in NRS scores and reported mild to moderate side-effects in the form of dizziness, headache and raised blood pressure.

Conclusion: Combined infusions of lignocaine-ketamine resulted in significant reduction in pain and disability in patients with fibromyalgia. Higher and repeated doses seem to be more effective and resulted in longer pain relief. Long-term follow-up periods are needed to determine the effectiveness, dose response and safety of these infusions as a therapeutic modality for fibromyalgia.

Keywords

Chronic pain, Electrocardiogram, Numerical rating scale, Postinfusion

Fibromyalgia is a complex disorder that affects 1% to 5% of the population and can occur at any age. It presents as a widespread chronic musculoskeletal pain without physical or laboratory signs of any specific pathologic process. Chronicity is the rule and disability of the syndrome and depression increases with disease duration (1). Treatment for fibromyalgia fall into several classes, that include; pharmacological, psychological, physical and complementary therapies (2). Pharmacological interference with central pain processing can be achieved in two ways: one is by augmenting the action of inhibitory pain pathways or by inhibiting the action of pain pathways. Inhibitory pathway augmentation may be achieved by noradrenergic and serotonergic drugs or by opioids. Activity of the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor (NMDAR)-mediated glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the spinal cord and brain results in nociceptive hypersensitivity. Ketamine being an NMDAR antagonist, it may reduce induction of synaptic plasticity and maintenance of states of chronic pain. Thus, the study of ketamine use in i.v. form to treat fibromyalgia has increased considerably (3). Lidocaine acts by blocking sodium channels on the neuronal membrane that may play a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and neuropathic pain (4),(5). Escalating doses of lignocaine and ketamine provide analgesia by acting on different molecular pathways. Administering them together may produce synergistic effects which can allow for using lower dosage of each medication and thereby reducing the corresponding side-effects (6). These infusions have been prescribed to the patients to alleviate pain in chronic pain syndromes like fibromyalgia for which standard anti-neuropathic medications have been ineffective or poorly tolerated by patients (6),(7),(8). Fibromyalgia is often difficult to treat and different drug combinations are being tried for unresponsive patients or those who present side-effects with oral medications. Hence, the present study aimed to evaluate effectiveness of i.v. lignocaine-ketamine infusions in reducing pain and disability in fibromyalgia syndrome.

The primary objective was to evaluate effectiveness of escalating doses of i.v. lignocaine-ketamine infusions in reducing pain as assessed using 11 point NRS Scale and disability using World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 score as primary objective. The secondary objective was to study adverse effects of the drugs lignocaine and ketamine.

Material and Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted at the Basaveshwara Medical College and Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka, India, between March 2021 and March 2022, on patients aged between 18-60 years diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome. Sixty patients were included in the study after obtaining ethical clearance from the Institutional Ethical Committee (BMCH/IEC/121/2021) and informed written consent was taken.

Sample size calculation: Sample size calculation formula:

N=4PQ/d2

P: The prevalence of the condition, considering 30% pain reduction among 88% study population in above study (9),
Q: (100-p)
d (or l): allowable error (10% of P),

=4X88x12/ (8.8)2
=54 ~ (approx)=60

Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome using Symptom Severity Index and Widespread pain Index Score (10) within the age group of 18-60 years of either sex were included in the study. Pain duration lasting >3 months, multifocal and non dermatomal neuropathic pain, those with failed medical management with atleast two neuromodulating agents (gabapentenoids, antidepressants) were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patient’s refusal to sign consent, allergic to lignocaine or ketamine, history of cardiovascular diseases, newly added analgesic or neuromodulating medications within 30 days, recently performed neuromodulating interventions within 90 days and previous lignocaine-ketamine infusions within six months were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Sample size is 30 in each group.

Study Procedure

During each treatment, patients were secured with 20 G i.v. cannula in the forearm, and their Electrocardiogram (ECG), Non Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP), Heart Rate (HR), and Oxygen (O2) saturation were monitored by a registered nurse. Escalating doses of i.v. lignocaine of 5 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg and 7 mg/kg followed by escalating doses of i.v. Ketamine 0.4 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg and 0.6 mg/kg were administered on alternate days (6). Infusions were given in 50 mL normal saline through syringe pump (BPL, Acura- S device) over a period of 45 minutes. The time interval between escalation of doses for both lignocaine and ketamine was 48 hours. Over a period of 12 days, total six infusions, three each of lignocaine and ketamine were given. Pre and postinfusion 11 point NRS score and WHODAS 2.0 score was noted. Eleven point NRS Scale was recorded serially at one hour, two hours and three hours postinfusion for both the drugs. Later patients were followed at weekly interval for four weeks postinfusion and monthly intervals upto three months to assess NRS and WHODAS 2.0 score. Repeat two-day bolus dose of i.v. lignocaine (7 mg/kg) and i.v. ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) was administered at the end of third month. Long-term analgesia was evaluated at follow-up visits done at monthly intervals up to six months. Side-effects of lignocaine such as oral numbness, dizziness, nausea, headache, brady and tachy arrhythmias, while that of ketamine like dizziness, confusion, nausea, euphoria, agitation, hallucinations were observed for patients with severe side-effects were excluded from the study. (As the side-effects in this study were very minimal, none of the study subjects were excluded from the study).

Pain was measured by using 11-point NRS (where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents maximal imaginable pain) (11). WHODAS 2.0, a patient self-report assessment tool recommended by the DSM-5 disability study group was applied to measure the disability of the patient’s pre and postdrug infusions. Postdrug infusions 2disability scoring was done at the end of first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth month. WHODAS 2.0 evaluates the patient’s ability to perform activities in six domains of functioning over the previous 30 days, and uses these to calculate a score representing global disability (12),(13). These domains are:

• Understanding and communicating;
• Getting around (mobility);
• Self-care;
• Getting along with people (social and interpersonal functioning);
• Life activities (home, academic, and occupational functioning);
• Participation in society (participation in family, social, and community activities).

There were 36 items in WHODAS 2.0 and each was rated from 0-4. The total score was added and a mean value was obtained for 60 patients. This mean was divided by 36 to get mean of average Disability score which will range from 0-4 where,

0-0.49=none
0.5-1.49=mild
1.5-2.49=moderate
2.5-3.49=severe
3.5-4=extreme

Statistical Analysis

Data were presented as mean and standard deviation. Statistical analysis was done by using the paired t-test for pre and post-treatment score. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The patient baseline characteristics: mean age (range)=40.20 years, with female predominance of 42 out of 60 patients (70%) while in males it was about 18 of 60 patients (30%). There was female (n=42, 70%) predominance than males (n=18, 30%) (Table/Fig 1).

Numerical Rating Score (NRS)

Pretreatment average baseline NRS score was 8.8. The mean reduction in NRS scores after lignocaine-ketamine infusions at the end of one month was 1.40 which was statistically significant (p-value ≤0.001). However, there was slight raise in NRS at the end of second and third month which was not statistically significant. After two days repeat infusions of lignocaine and ketamine the mean NRS was 1.25 which was statistically significant. Three patients did not have reduction in NRS scores and reported mild to moderate side-effects in the form of dizziness, headache, raised BP (Table/Fig 2).

Shows the mean average disability score at different intervals. Pretreatment mean average disability score was 2.70 and at the end of sixth month it was 0.59 which was statistically significant (p-value=0.001) (Table/Fig 3).

With respect to complications observed during the study, patients those who received lignocaine did not complain of any side-effects postinfusion.

Post ketamine infusion patients complained of minimal side-effects like, hallucinations (n=5), nausea/vomiting (n=2), and there were no complaints of agitation, memory defects, cardiovascular effects and hepatotoxicity. The findings were not statistically significant.

Discussion

Fibromyalgia is a chronic syndrome with a variety of symptoms that include, widespread musculoskeletal pain, tender points, disturbed sleep, fatigue and is frequently associated with disability, reduced quality of life and depression (14).

Systemic local anaesthetics are primarily prescribed for their anti-arrhythmic actions. Short-term analgesia with i.v. lignocaine in a variety of neuropathic pain conditions, such as diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia was well tolerated by these patients and had prolonged relief from these treatments (15),(16),(17).

Intravenous ketamine infusions have been used extensively to treat refractory neuropathic pain conditions. Low dose ketamine produces strong analgesia in chronic pain states, presumably by inhibition of NMDAR. Other mechanisms include enhancement of descending inhibition and anti-inflammatory effects at central sites. Also, they are known to have additional effects on mu opioid and dopamine receptors (1). In the present study of 60 patients, it showed that lignocaine-ketamine infusions safely and effectively reduced pain and disability in a significant number of patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia.

Vlainich R et al., discussed the long-term effect of lignocaine analgesia and suggested that a reduction in medullary sensitisation is responsible for the extended duration of pain relief (18).

Schafranski MD et al., presented reductions in patients’ Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) scores immediately after the five-day course of i.v. lignocaine and 30 days after their fifth infusion (19). NRS scale is widely used in clinical settings because it is easy to administer and score. Whereas in VAS, the patient is asked for visualisation of his pain as a point on 10 cm line presented on paper. Although many studies have shown a high correlation between VAS and NRS, NRS shows greater compliance and ease of use compared to VAS (20). They also stated that for each 1 mg increase in lignocaine, the odds of achieving 30% pain relief 3benchmark increased by 0.2%. Similarly, every 10 mg increase in the ketamine dose was associated with a 21% increase in the odds of achieving a 30% reduction in pain scores. Thus, the analgesic effect of i.v. infusions of lignocaine is significantly longer than the biological half-life of lignocaine (approximately 120 minutes) as well as the biological half-life of its active metabolites (up to 12 hours).

Wilderman I et al., presented a retrospective chart review of 74 patients diagnosed with Fibromyalgia who underwent at least three escalating doses of i.v. lignocaine infusions (5 mg/kg of body weight, 7.5 mg/kg, and 7.5 mg/kg of lignocaine+2.5 g of magnesium sulfate) and demonstrated that escalating doses of i.v. lignocaine to 7.5 mg/kg safely and effectively reduced the pain with prolonged effect in a significant number of patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia (5).

Hanna AF et al., presented a case report of VAS 7/10 pretreatment which reduced to VAS 0/10 post i.v. ketamine infusion and remained same for >1 year (1). In a study conducted by Noppers I et al., with 0.5 mg/kg ketamine infusion in 24 subjects diagnosed with fibromyalgia showed that VAS scores were lower in Ketamine group at 15 minutes after infusion, but there was no difference between groups beyond that time point (21). Hence, the need for repeated infusions is substantiated in the present study for long-term pain relief.

In a study conducted by Becerra L et al., using ketamine infusion in 19 subjects with neuropathic pain showed that ketamine-treated group demonstrated greater decreases in pain scores that lasted for 12 weeks post-treatment evaluation period (22).

Sigtermans MJ et al., studied 60 CRPS-1 patients with severe pain in a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled parallel-group trial. Patients were given a 4.2-day intravenous infusion of low-dose ketamine using an individualised stepwise tailoring of dosage based on effect and side effects. The primary outcome of the study was the pain score during the 12-week study period and they concluded lowest pain relief at the end of first week. Also, treatment with ketamine was safe with psychomimetic side effects that were acceptable to most patients (23).

Raphael J et al., reported that 42% of Fibromyalgia patients had adverse effects, of which two were serious during six consecutive daily infusions of escalating doses of i.v. lignocaine up to 550 mg over six hours (4).

In the present study, the length of pain relief was relatively sustained in duration. None of the subjects experienced major side-effects. Minimal side-effects such as hallucinations to ketamine was noticed postinfusion which was short lived and subsided within one hour. After lignocaine infusions the patients did not encounter any side-effects.

Multiple studies have found WHODAS 2.0 to be reliable, responsive to change, and applicable across geographic regions. As a standardised cross-cultural measurement of health status, it has been demonstrated to have robust psychometric properties across a wide variety of psychiatric and physical disorders without regard to aetiology [11,12]. Hence, it was adopted in the present study and post-treatment disability scores were significantly reduced.

Limitation(s)

The study was conducted only in patients belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Class I and II physical status. Effects of lignocaine and ketamine for fibromyalgia in geriatric population and those having associated comorbidities are yet to be studied. The study was conducted with a sample size of 60 patients, 30 in each study group, results obtained cannot be generalised for entire population. Randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trials with different infusion protocols should be conducted to apply these results to a larger population. Long-term follow-up periods are needed to determine the effectiveness, dose response and safety of these infusions as a therapeutic modality for fibromyalgia.

Conclusion

In conclusion, combined infusions of lignocaine-ketamine resulted in significant reduction in fibromyalgia syndrome symptoms. Higher and repeated doses seem to be more effective and resulted in longer pain relief and improving disability.

References

1.
Hanna AF, Abraham B, Hanna A, McKenna M, Smith AJ. Intravenous ketamine produces long-term pain relief in a patient with fibromyalgia. Journal of Medical Cases. 2016;9(5):142-44. [crossref]
2.
Goldenberg DL, Felson DT, Dinerman H. A randomized, controlled trial of amitriptyline and naproxen in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29(11):1371-77. Doi: 10.1002/art.1780291110. PMID: 3535811. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Pastrak M, Abd-Elsayed A, Ma F, Vrooman B, Visnjevac O. Systematic review of the use of intravenous ketamine for fibromyalgia. Ochsner J. 2021;21(4):387-94. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Raphael JH, Southall JL, Treharne GJ, Kitas GD. Efficacy and adverse effects of intravenous lignocaine therapy in fibromyalgia syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. Sep 2002;3(21):01-08. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Wilderman I, Pugacheva O, Perelman VS, Wansbrough MCT, Voznyak Y, Zolnierczyk L. Repeated intravenous lidocaine infusions for patients with fibromyalgia: Higher doses of lidocaine have a stronger and longer-lasting effect on pain reduction. Pain Med. 2020;21:1230-39. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Kvarnstrom A, Karlsten R, Quiding H, Emanuelsson BM, Gordh T. The effectiveness of intravenous ketamine and lidocaine on peripheral neuropathic pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003;47:868-77. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Orhurhu V, Orhurhu MS, Bhatia A, Cohen SP. Ketamine infusions for chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2019;129:241-54. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Noppers I, Niesters M, Aarts L, Smith T, Sarton E, Dahan A. Ketamine for the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010;11:2417-29. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Michael Vlessides. IV Ketamine and Lidocaine combination shows safety and efficacy in chronic pain. Clinical Pain Medicine. June 21,2019.
10.
Berwick R, Barker C, Goebel A, guideline development group. The diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome. Clinical Medicine. 2022;22(6):570-74.
11.
Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 1):S17-24. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Gold LH. DSM-5 and the assessment of functioning: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online. 2014;42(2):173-81.
13.
Üstün TB, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Rehm J. Measuring health and disability: Manual for WHO disability assessment schedule WHODAS 2.0. World Health Organization; 2010.
14.
Ledingham J, Doherty S, Doherty M. Primary fibromyalgia syndrome- an outcome study. Br J Rheumatol. 1993;32(2):139-42. Doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/32.2.139. PMID: 8428227. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Kastrup J, Petersen P, Dejgård A, Angelo HR, Hilsted J. Intravenous lidocaine infusion--a new treatment of chronic painful diabetic neuropathy. Pain. 1987;28(1):69-75. Doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)91061-X. PMID: 3822496. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Rowbotham MC, Reisner-Keller LA, Fields HL. Both intravenous lidocaine and morphine reduce the pain of postherpetic neuralgia. Neurology. 1991;41(7):1024- 28. Doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.7.1024. PMID: 1712433. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Edwards WT, Habib F, Burney RG, Begin G. Intravenous lidocaine in the management of various chronic pain states: A review of 211 cases. Regional Anaesthesia. 1985;10:01-06.
18.
Vlainich R, Issy AM, Sakata RK. Effect of intravenous lidocaine associated with amitriptyline on pain relief and plasma serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine concentrations in fibromyalgia. Clin J Pain. 2011;27(4):285-88. Doi: 10.1097/ AJP.0b013e3181ffbfde. PMID: 21178598. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Schafranski MD, Malucelli T, Machado F, Takeshi H, Kaiber F, Schmidt C, et al. Intravenous lidocaine for fibromyalgia syndrome: An open trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2009;28(7):853-55. Doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1137-8. Epub 2009 Mar 5. PMID: 19263182. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Bielewicz J, Daniluk B, Kamieniak P. VAS and NRS, same or different? Are visual analog scale values and numerical rating scale equally viable tools for assessing patients after microdisectomy? Pain Research and Management. 2022;2022:5337483. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Noppers I, Niesters M, Swartjes M, Bauer M, Aarts L, Gelejinse N, et al. Absence of long-term analgesic effect from a short-term S-ketamine infusion on fibromyalgia pain: A randomized, prospective, double blind, active placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2011;15(9):942-49. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Becerra L, Schwartzman RJ, Kiefer RT, Rohr P, Moulton EA, Wallin D, et al. CNS measures of pain responses pre-and post-anesthetic ketamine in a patient with complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Medicine. 2015;16(12):2368-85.
23.
Sigtermans MJ, Van Hilten JJ, Bauer MC, Arbous MS, Marinus J, Sarton EY, et al. Ketamine produces effective and long-term pain relief in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Pain. 2009;145(3):304-311.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63605.17779

Date of Submission: Feb 19, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 06, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Mar 27, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 27, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 15, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 25, 2023 (22%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com