Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 250936

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : UC06 - UC08 Full Version

Air Versus Distilled Water Cuff Inflation using Cuffill (Digital Cuff) in Adult Patients Undergoing General Anaesthesia


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62013.17672
Pooja Arunkumar Giriyapur, Ravi Madhusudhana

1. Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Ravi Madhusudhana,
Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Tamaka, Kolar-563101, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: ravijaggu@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: An essential part of anaesthesia is endotracheal intubation. The Endotracheal Tube (ETT) cuff pressure must not be higher than the predicted 22-30 mmHg tracheal perfusion pressure. If the ETT’s cuff is inflated with air while under nitrous oxide+oxygen anaesthesia, the cuff pressure may increase dangerously and result in ischaemia of the tracheal mucosa. Hence, distilled water as an alternative agent to air for inflation of cuffs of ETTs was used in the present study.

Aim: To determine whether inflating the ETT cuff with distilled water, instead of air changes the pressure over time. To evaluate changes in cuff pressure over time, and to assess the knowledge about endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring with cuffill.

Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology at Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kolar, Karnataka, India, from February 2022 to April 2022. The study included 50 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia who were randomly divided into two groups. In group A, distilled water was used and in group B, air was used to inflate the cuffs of ETTs. General anaesthesia was given with nitrous oxide, oxygen and relaxant technique. The intracuff pressures of ETT cuffs were recorded by AG cuffill. Increase of pressures with time were recorded and analysed.

Results: Mean ET cuff pressure by cuffill with air (group B) was 26±2.43 mmH2O after 0 minutes of intubation. After 15 minutes of intubation mean ET cuff pressure was 31.80±3.39 mmH2O. Mean ET cuff pressure by cuffill with distilled water (group A) was 25.56±2.02 mmHg after zero minutes of intubation. After 15 minutes of intubation, mean ET cuff pressure was 28.5±2.26 cmH2O. There was a pressure difference observed between the groups with a mean difference of 3.217, t-value of 4.743 and a p-value=0.001.

Conclusion: For the purpose of inflating the cuffs of ETTs when the patient is under general anaesthesia with the use of nitrous oxide, oxygen, and relaxant method, distilled water may be considered a more desirable agent than air.

Keywords

Positive pressure ventilation, Stenosis, Trachea

An essential part of anaesthesia is endotracheal intubation (1). By forming a seal between the patient’s trachea and the cuff, the ETT cuff has two primary purposes: to reduce air leakage during Positive Pressure Ventilation (PPV) and to prevent aspiration of gastric contents (2). Since, its commercial introduction in the 20th century, ETT cuffs have undergone several changes, going from first-generation, low-volume, high pressure cuffs made of inflexible material (reusable rubber) to high volume, low pressure cuffs made of softer, more pliable, and disposable material (2). The cuffs on modern ETTs are made of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) (50-80 micron), which is non toxic, smooth, transparent, and reasonably priced. They are also very compliant, high-volume, low-pressure cuffs. Additionally possessing thermoplastic qualities, these ETTs adapt to the patient’s anatomy at body temperature (3). When the cuff folds, serving as micro-channels, are developed in the surplus material of the cuff, aspiration can become more common (1). High-volume, low-pressure cuffs can adapt quickly to the varied geometries of the trachea (3).

In order to prevent complications from impeding tracheal mucosal blood flow, the pressure applied to the tracheal mucosa by the ETT cuff should be as low as feasible, while still being high enough to create a reliable seal when administering PPV. The ETT cuff pressure must not be higher than the predicted 22-30 mmHg tracheal perfusion pressure (4),(5). When the ETT cuff pressure is higher than the capillary blood pressure supplying the trachea, tracheal damage with pathological alterations starts, and ischaemia with inflammation follows (6). This can cause mucosal necrosis, ulceration, granulation, and the development of scar tissue, which can result in stenosis if it is not treated (7). When completely inflated, high-volume, low-pressure cuffs can expand to a diameter that is between 1.5 and two times larger than the normal adult human trachea. As a result of the substantial mucosal contact area, they might be connected to a sore throat (8),(9). When under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation, sore throats and coughs are frequent complaints.

A variety of ETT cuff inflating procedures are frequently used. These include palpation of the pilot balloon as a reference for the amount of air required to inflate the cuff, Minimal Leak Technique (MLT), Minimal Occlusive Volume (MOV), and inflating the cuff with a Predefined Volume of Air (PVA) (3).

The aim of the present study was to determine whether inflating the ETT cuff with distilled water, instead of air changes the pressure. The secondary objective was to evaluate changes in cuff pressure over time and to assess the knowledge about endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring with cuffill.

Material and Methods

This randomised clinical study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology at Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kolar, Karnataka, India. The study was commenced on 1st February 2022 and continued till 30th April 2022. The Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) had approved the study (DMC/KLR/IEC/636/2021-2022).

Inclusion criteria: The study included patients (males and females) between 18 to 80 years of age who underwent elective surgery (Ear Nose Throat {ENT}, Obstetrics and Gynecology {OBG}, neurosurgery, orthopaedic surgery, oncology surgery) under general anaesthesia, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1/2.

Exclusion criteria: Patients undergoing any kind of emergency surgery were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated based on a study by Ahamed M et al., considering ETT cuff pressure (1). Using the formula: n=2(za,+z1-β)2 σ2/d2. Where, Z1-α/2=value of Z at 99% level of confidence (2.6), σ=pooled standard deviation (6.8), d=5% assumed margin of error (5). A total of 75 patients were enrolled after meeting exclusion criteria. Seventy patients were ultimately included in the analysis. A total 31 patients were included in the group A and 39 patients in the group B by purposive sampling.

Study Procedure

Before the anaesthesia was administered, the patients were examined comprehensively and their medical history was recorded. Patients’ weights and other vitals were recorded. Complete haemogram, serum electrolytes, renal function test, Bleeding Time (BT) and Clotting Time (CT), electrocardiogram, chest X-ray were all pre-op tests that were requested. One day prior to surgery, all patients were evaluated, investigation findings were reviewed, the anaesthetic process was explained, and informed consent was obtained. Patients were given pills of 0.5 mg alprazolam and 150 mg ranitidine the night before surgery, morning dose was repeated, patients were to fast for eight hours.

Following informed consent, 70 patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia were divided into two groups: 31 patients in group A (distilled water) and 39 patients in group B (air). There were 37 male patients and 33 female patients.

Venous access was secured with 18G Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) and fluids were initiated. After the patient was moved to Operation Theatre (OT), monitoring of their basal Heart Rate (HR), Non Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP), and Oxygen Saturation (SPO2) began. Patients were premedicated with Inj. Glycopyrrolate 0.005 mg/kg prior to the induction of anaesthesia. Preoxygenation was carried out with 100% oxygen for three minutes, then propofol injection at 2 mg/kg was used to produce unconsciousness until verbal commands were lost. After the loading dose was given, the required monitoring parameters were again recorded. Tracheal intubation with an appropriate-sized oral ETT was performed after giving succinylcholine 2 mg/kg muscle relaxant and bilateral equal air entry was confirmed by five point auscultation, tube was fixed with plasters. High-volume, low-pressure cuff Portex ETTs (disposable) were used. Every patient in the distilled water group had their ETT held vertically with the cuff facing down, inflated with distilled water, and then sucked out using a syringe. Repeatedly using a syringe filled with distilled water, the cuff was inflated until all of the original air pockets were gone.

A 60% N2O in oxygen, isoflurane, and injectable Vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg) are used to maintain anaesthesia. Patients were mechanically ventilated to maintain end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) between 20 to 30 mmHg. After inducing general anaesthesia and performing endotracheal intubation on the 31 patients in the distilled water group, the cuffs were inflated with 5-8 mL of distilled water until the pilot balloon was full. In each case, the quantity of distilled water injected into the cuff was recorded. Endotracheal intubation was performed on the 39 patients in the air group, and then the cuffs were inflated using a syringe and a cuffill inflator. The beginning cuff pressure was measured and recorded. Glycopyrrolate 0.02 mg/kg+neostigmine 0.08 mg/kg was able to antagonise the effects of non depolarizing skeletal muscle relaxants. Oral suction was performed once the patient regained full consciousness and had a normal set of defence mechanisms. Patients in the air group had their cuffs deflated using a syringe after the final intracuff pressure was measured using AG cuffill. Extubation was completed once all of the air had been sucked out of the cuff. For the patients in the distilled water group, extubation occurred after the cuff was drained dry 7using a syringe. The authors assumed that the intracuff pressure did not rise during the operation because only the initial amount of water came out and no more air could be sucked from the cuff.

Statistical Analysis

The data collected were entered into Microsoft excel sheet (Redmond, USA) and results were analysed. All the quantitative measures was presented as (Mean±SD), Confidence interval, qualitative measures like gender, ASA physical status etc., by proportions and CI. Independent Sample t-test was done for comparing the mean pressures between the groups:

Normality of the data has been checked using Shapiro-Wilk test, and the data is normally disturbed (p<0.05). An unpaired t-test has been employed to determine the ETT cut-off pressure between the two groups.

Results

Most of the patients belonged to 20 to 50 year age group (Table/Fig 1). Most patients were males (n=37) and rest were females (n=33). There were no significant differences between two groups with respect to age, gender, ASA status and Body Mass Index (BMI).

Mean cuff pressure in air and distilled water inflated cuffs are shown in (Table/Fig 2). Mean cuff pressure in group B exceeded those in group A throughout the study with significant rise in 15 minutes (p<0.05). The pressure at the baseline measurement in the group A ranged from 26±2.43, and in the group B, it was 25.56±2.023.

ETT tube size of 7.5 mm Internal Diameter (ID) showed higher pressure at 15 minutes (33 cmH20), followed by size 7,8 and 8.5 (Table/Fig 3).

Discussion

Although, routine ETT cuff pressure measurement has been advocated as a way to reduce tracheal damage, it is not frequently used. Regular, periodic cuff pressure checks and deflation as needed take time, are distracting, and can cause periods of both over-and under-inflation. Several strategies have been suggested to stop the increase in ETT cuff pressure caused by N2O anaesthesia (10). To prevent excessive cuff pressures during surgery, devices such rediffusion systems, pressure release valves, and foam-filled cuffs have been suggested. It has been demonstrated that a number of gas barrier tubes can effectively stop rises in ETT cuff pressures, but they are pricey. Another way to maintain low intracuff pressures is to fill the ETT cuff with N2O/oxygen mixes or a sample of the inspired gas combination (11).

The cuff may become underinflated or overinflated depending on the N2O concentration being utilised, and cuff leaks may result. The normal saline-filled cuffs have also stopped the cuff pressure from rising (12). To the authors knowledge, there has not been any study that evaluated the efficacy of ETT cuffs filled with water.

To avoid difficulties, the normal ETT cuff pressure should be kept between 20 to 30 cmH2O [12,13]. The present study was carried out to determine the variations in the ETT cuff pressure in two distinct media, distilled water and air. The pressure change in water media was less compared to air media.

A study performed by Bes¸ ir A and Erdog? an G found that cuff pressures were significantly higher in group A (air) than in group S (saline) (12). In another study by Ahmad NL and Norsidosh AM found that water-filled ETT cuffs exerted noticeably less pressure than air-filled cuffs over the whole hour of monitoring (14). At one hour, the increase in mean ETT cuff pressure following air inflation (25.53±8.89) was three times greater than after water distension (7.70±3.63). It was observed that the increase in tracheal cuff pressure occurs primarily during the first hour of anaesthesia. Because the blood/water coefficient of N2O is not exactly 1.0, the slight increase in cuff pressure was anticipated.

The anaesthetist should take steps to prevent harmful increases in cuff pressure during N2O anaesthesia in the absence of routine ETT cuff measurement or monitoring. Many other tools and methods have been suggested, but many of them are neither useful nor cost-effective. A feasible, affordable, and non-polluting alternative technique is to utilise sterile, distilled water. In contrast to saline, which is only provided as a 500 mL pack, distilled water is readily available in an operating room in compact 10 mL ampoules or plastic containers. As a result of the substantially reduced rise in cuff pressure during nitrous oxide anaesthesia, water distension of an ETT cuff is a suitable substitute for air inflation (10).

Limitation(s)

Use of nitrous oxide during surgery increases cuff pressure, it might increase postoperative sore throat incidence (15). The sample size could have been more and studies with distilled water is comparatively less for references.

Conclusion

In the investigation, researchers examined the pressure exerted by ETT cuffs filled with air and distilled water while the subjects were under general nitrous oxide anaesthesia. The cuffill gadget was used to measure cuff pressures. The research found that ETT cuffs loaded with air increased in pressure over time more than those supplied with distilled water. The authors’ findings suggest that using distilled water rather than air to inflate the ET tube is the best course of action.

References

1.
Ahamed M, Kumar S, Balasubramanian S. A Comparative study on the Endotracheal tube cuff pressure changes between supine and prone in patients undergoing prone position surgeries. J Anaesth. 2019;6(5):1599-603. [crossref]
2.
Sultan P, Carvalho B, Rose BO, Cregg R. Endotracheal tube cuff pressure monitoring: A review of the evidence. J Perioper Pract. 2011;21(11):379-86. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Gilliland L, Perrie H, Scribante J. Endotracheal tube cuff pressures in adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia in two Johannesburg academic hospitals. South Afr J Anaesth Analg. 2015;21(3):81-84. [crossref]
4.
Sengupta P, Sessler DI, Maglinger P. Endotracheal tube cuff pressure in three hospitals, andthe volume required to produce an appropriate cuff pressure. BMC Anaesthesiol. 2004;4(1):8. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Dullenkopf A, Gerber A, Weiss M. Fluid leakage past tracheal tube cuffs: Evaluation of the newMicrocuff endotracheal tube. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:1849-53. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Letvin A, Kremer P, Silver P, Samih N, Reed-Watts P, Kollef M. Frequent versus infrequent monitoring of endotracheal tube cuff pressures. Respir Care. 2018;63(5):495-501. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Abubaker J, Zia Ullah S, Ahmed S, Rehman Memon A, Abubaker Z, Ansari M, et al. Evaluating the knowledge of endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring among critical care providers by palpation of pilot balloon and by endotracheal tube cuff manometer. Cureus. 2019;11(7):e5061. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Yildirim ZB, Uzunkoy A, Cigdem A, Ganidagli S, Ozgonul A. Changes of cuff pressures of endotracheal tubes during laparoscopic and open surgeries. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):398-401. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Geng G, Hu J, Huang S. The effect of endotracheal tube cuff pressure change during gynecological laparoscopic surgery on postoperative sore throat: A control study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29:141-44. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Murthy SGK. A comparative study of 2 agents, air and distilled water for inflation of the cuffs of endotracheal tubes during laparoscopic surgical procedures under general anaesthesia. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2016;3(31):1386-90. [crossref]
11.
Gadpale B, Patel DR, Kotak MN. A prospective, randomised controlled study to compare changes in endotracheal tube cuff pressure during general anaesthesia using nitrous oxide between air and distilled water cuff inflation using pressure gauge and pressure transducer. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16(2) 2279-0853. [crossref]
12.
Bes¸ ir A, Erdog? an G. Comparison between cuff pressures of endotracheal tubes inflated with saline or air in low-flow anaesthesia. Clin Exp Health Sci. 2018;8:112-17.
13.
Lin Y, Lin D, Chen B, Ji C, Yuan C, Wang B. Experimental study of the monitoring bias of pressure in intubation balloon using handheld pressure gauge. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014;26(5):347-50.
14.
Ahmad NL, Norsidosh AM. Change of endotracheal tube cuff pressure during nitrous oxide anaesthesia: Comparison between air and distilled water cuff inflation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2001;29(5):510-14. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Liu J, Zhang X, Gong W, Li S, Wang F, Fu S, et al. Correlations between controlled endotracheal tube cuff pressure and postprocedural complications: A multicenter study. Anaesth Analg. 2010;111:1133-37.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62013.17672

Date of Submission: Dec 02, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 12, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 11, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 08, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 30, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 09, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com