Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 32443

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : SC05 - SC10 Full Version

Clinical Profile of Dengue Fever and its Utility in Early Prediction of Severe Dengue Among Children Less than 18 Years at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Northern India


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62502.17765
Rohit Chib, Sudesh Singh, Manju Devi, Najmus Saqib

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Government Medical College, Kathua, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Government Medical College, Kathua, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 3. Medical Officer, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Health and Family Welfare, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Government Medical College, Doda, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Rohit Chib,
C/o Roshan Lal Chib, House No. 60, Green Park, Officer Enclave, Udhaywalla, Lower Palourae-180002, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
E-mail: rohitchibgbpant@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Dengue is the emerging mosquito-borne infectious disease in India. Dengue is endemic in many countries across the world. Dengue is one of the major causes of paediatric morbidity and mortality and clinical profile of dengue patients change from time to time and region to region. The elucidation of the clinical profile is very important for patient management and saving lives.

Aim: To assess the clinical profile of Dengue Fever (DF) and its utility in early prediction of severe dengue among children 0 to 18 years according to National Guidelines for Clinical Management of DF 2014 at a tertiary care hospital, in Northern India.

Materials and Methods: The present observational study was conducted in Department of Paediatrics at GMC, Kathua, Jammu and Kashmir, India, from 1st June 2021 to 30th November 2021. All the clinically suspected patients of dengue in the age group 0 to 18 years were subjected to NS1 antigen and Immunoglobulin M (IgM), Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody tests, all patients positive for these were considered as confirmed dengue patients and were included into the study. Parameters studied were the clinical profile of DF and its utility in prediction of severe dengue. Data was analysed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 28.0.1.0 (142) and different groups were compared by using the Chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression. The p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Out of the total 640 febrile patients, 71 (11.1%) were positive for dengue and were enrolled in the study. NS1 was positive in 67.6%, IgM in 56.33% and IgG (along with NS1 or IgM or both) in 32.4%. Flushed facies at 81.6% was the most common clinical finding followed by myalgia 74.6%, headache 73.2%, facial puffiness 66.2%, vomiting 54.9%, rash 50.7%, arthralgia 33.8% and retro-orbital pain in 16.9%. The total number of patients with co-morbidities was 7 (9.9%). Patients with warning signs having hepatomegaly ≥2 cm Below Costal Margin (BCM) were 49.3%, followed by recurrent vomiting 38%, pain abdomen 38%, restlessness 33.8%, minor bleeding 28.2% and lethargy 23%. Signs of cardiovascular collapse were cold calamities 26.7% followed by shock 23.9% and narrow pulse pressure <20 mmHg 12.6%. The metabolic disturbance was seen in 12 (16.9%) patients and severe organ involvement in 11 (15.5%). The tourniquet test was positive for 52.1%. A whole blood transfusion was given to eight patients. Only one patient expired with total mortality of 1.4%.

Conclusion: Vomiting and myalgia were found to be statistically significant for early prediction of severe dengue, which may help in early initiation of treatment and decrease both morbidity and mortality. Patients presenting with atypical manifestations of severe organ involvement were also included under the severe dengue category, which was not possible according to previous guidelines.

Keywords

Haemorrhage, Hypotension, Petechiae, Shock

The DF has been identified as an emerging infectious disease in India. Dengue is the most important mosquito-borne disease, which is found to be endemic in more than 100 countries (1). In South-east Asia, dengue is the major cause of paediatric morbidity and mortality (2). Apart from urban areas this disease is also spreading in rural areas (3). There are certain salient clinical features for the diagnosis of disease, but it can also present with varied clinical manifestations (4). The interpretation of the clinical profile is prime for patient management and thus, critical for saving lives (5).

Due to limitations in World Health Organisation’s (WHO) 1997 dengue classification guidelines, the agency revised their guidelines in 2009 (6), clinical classification was again revised as National Guidelines for DF 2014, classifying cases into mild (D1), moderate (D2) and severe (D3) dengue which was much easier to understand (7),(8). Again on 20th October 2020, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India approved the latest National Guideline for Dengue Case Management, during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (9).

Manifestations of DF vary from being asymptomatic to Dengue Shock Syndrome (DSS) and differ from epidemic to epidemic even in the same region and with period of time (8),(9). Early recognition of fever is important as delay in treatment results in increased morbidity and mortality (10). Dengue according to the 2014 classification, presents as a spectrum of disease rather than a distinct phase as in the earlier classifications (11), this knowledge affects the clinical management and triaging of the patients

So, the present study was done with an aim to assess the clinical profile of dengue patients and its utility in early prediction of severe dengue among children 0 to 18 years as per National Guidelines for Clinical Management of DF 2014.

Material and Methods

The present observational study was conducted in Department of Paediatrics at GMC, Kathua, Jammu and Kashmir, India, from 1st June 2021 to 30th November 2021. All the children who presented to the Department of Paediatrics GMC, Kathua with suspected DF were subjected to blood tests for dengue infection. The study aimed to find out the clinical pattern of dengue patients and its utility in the early prediction of severe dengue among children 0 to 18 years according to the National Guidelines for Clinical Management of DF 2014 (8). Ethical clearance from Institutional Ethical Committee was taken under letter no IEC/GMCK/86.

Inclusion criteria: All the clinically suspected dengue patients in the age group 0 to 18 years irrespective of the duration of illness were subjected to both the dengue NS1 antigen tests (by immune-chromatography method) and IgM, IgG antibody tests done by the same method. All the clinically suspected patients positive for dengue antigen and/or antibody tests were taken as confirmed dengue patients (11) and were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Dengue confirmed patients with co-infections like enteric fever and malaria were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

History, findings on clinical examination and laboratory investigations of all the dengue confirmed patients were recorded on the proforma on the day of admission and monitored for further progression of the disease. Laboratory investigations recorded were complete blood count {(Total Leucocyte Count (TLC) <5000/mm3 for leucopaenia, platelets <1 lac/mm3 and haematocrit}, Liver Function Tests (LFT) {Alanine Transaminase (ALT) and Aspartate Transaminase (AST) ≥2 times upper limit of normal}, coagulation profile {Prothrombin Time (PT), activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) and International Normalised Ratio (INR)}, serum electrolytes (sodium, potassium and calcium), Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) analysis and blood sugar; above parameters were used for grading of dengue patients (8).

Other parameters like recurrent vomiting, pain abdomen, lethargy, restlessness, minor bleeds, hepatomegaly ≥2 cm Below Costal Margin (BCM), rapid pulse, narrow pulse pressure <20 mm of Hg, cold clammy extremities, hypotension for age, significant bleeding, severe organ involvement, severe metabolic disturbance and shock findings were also entered into proforma. Simultaneously, Ultrasonography (USG) abdomen and chest radiographs for pleural effusion and ascites with the percentage change in haematocrit >20% (at time of admission and discharge) were recorded for evidence of plasma leak and tourniquet test for haemorrhagic tendencies, all above parameters were recorded for clinical classification of DF (8).

All cases of fever with laboratory-positive NS1, IgM or IgG (along with NS1 or IgM or both) were classified clinically into mild, moderate and severe dengue according to national guidelines for clinical management of DF 2014. The DF without complications like haemorrhagic tendencies, hypotension and organ involvement and evidence of capillary leakage (on chest X-ray, USG abdomen or 20% change in haematocrit) were included under mild illness (8).

Moderate dengue: It included patients with co-morbidities and high-risk factors (like diabetes, hypertension, immunosuppression, anticoagulation, haemoglobinopathies or infants) and or dengue with warning signs and symptoms (Like recurrent vomiting i.e., ≥2 episodes/hour, Abdominal pain/tenderness, general weakness/letharginess/restlessness, mild pleural effusion/ascites, Hepatomegaly ≥2 cm below the costal margin and increased haematocrit >20% above baseline) and/or Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever (DHF) I and II with minor bleeds (8).

Severe dengue: It includes patients with DF or DHF with significant haemorrhage, shock (DHFIII and IV-DSS), severe organ involvement {Expanded Dengue Syndrome (EDS)} and/or severe metabolic disturbances (like hypoglycaemia, Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) changes, sodium, potassium and calcium changes) after prolonged shock [8,12].

Clinical features of DF: A febrile illness upto seven days with the below symptoms: of facial puffiness, flushed facies, rash, 6retro-orbital pain, headache, vomiting, pain abdomen, myalgia, arthralgia or haemorrhagic tendencies (8).

Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever (DH F) defining criteria (13):

a) A case with clinical features of DF
b) Haemorrhagic tendencies as noticed by one of the following:

• A positive tourniquet test.
• Petechiae, ecchymosis or purpura.
• Bleeding from the gastrointestinal tract, injection sites or other sites.

c) Thrombocytopaenia (with <1 lac cells per mm3).
d) Increased plasma leakage due to increased vascular permeability, as shown by any of the following:

• A drop of 20% or more in haematocrit after fluid replacement, when compared to baseline.
• Other signs of plasma leakage (like pleural effusion and ascites).

Dengue Shock Syndrome (DSS) (8): All the criteria for DHF with features of circulatory failure as noticed by rapid and feeble pulse and narrow pulse pressure (mmHg) or hypotension for age, cold and clammy skin and restlessness.

Grading of Dengue Fever (DF)/Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever (DH F) into four grades (13):

DHF I: Features of DF plus positive tourniquet test with any feature of the plasma leakage and thrombocytopenia with platelet count less than 1 lac/mm3.

DHFII : Features of DHFI plus any spontaneous haemorrhage into mucocutaneous or other organs (like black tarry stool, epistaxis or gum bleeds) and pain in the abdomen.

DHFIII (DSS): Features of DHFII plus symptoms and signs of circulatory failure (like cold clammy skin, rapid weak pulse, hypotension, narrow pulse pressure less than 20 mmHg).

DHFIV (DSS): Features of DHFIII with symptoms and signs of profound shock with undetectable pulses or blood pressure.

Organ involvement {Expanded Dengue Syndrome (EDS)}: Unusual clinical manifestations of organ involvement observed in EDS are shown in (Table/Fig 1) (8).

Tourniquet test: The tourniquet test was performed by inflating the blood pressure cuff to a mid-point between the diastolic and systolic pressures and maintaining that pressure for nearly five minutes, the test was considered positive when 10 or more petechiae appear per one square inch area over the forearm (14) and was used as evidence for haemorrhagic tendency.

Hypotension for age was defined as the systolic pressure below the 5th percentile for that age, that is ≤60 mmHg in <1 month, ≤70 mmHg in one month to one year, ≤70+(2×age in years) mmHg in one to 10 years and ≤90 mmHg in >10 years (15).

As per national guidelines for dengue 2014, significant bleeding was defined as >10% of blood loss from the total blood volume of the body (total blood volume is 80 mL/kg) and indications for whole blood transfusion were fixed at, haemoglobin levels ≤5 mg%, also significant bleeding and concealed bleeding were defined by haematocrit drop and unstable vital signs despite adequate volume replacement (8).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analysed by SPSS software version 28.0.1.0 (142) and different groups were compared by using the Chi-square test. Logistic regression was applied to identify the factors for early picking up of severe dengue infection. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The total patients admitted to the Department of Paediatrics during study period were 640, out of which febrile patients positive for dengue NS1 antigen and/or antibody were 82. Dengue positive patients having coinfections were 11 (eight patients were positive for malaria and three for enteric fever) so, excluded from the study. Finally, 71 (11.1%) children upto age of 18 years diagnosed with DF were included in the study. All laboratory-proven dengue patients, based on the clinical spectrum presented during the hospital stay, were classified into mild dengue (D1) 34 (47.9%), moderate dengue (D2) 20 (28.2%) and severe dengue (D3) 17 (23.9%).

In the present study, 53 (74.6%) were boys and 18 (25.4%) girls. A higher percentage of boys had severe dengue 15 (88.2%) as compared to the girls. A total of 65 (91.5%) patients were urban in comparison to 6 (8.4%) rural. (Table/Fig 2) shows age-wise distribution of dengue patients across dengue clinical severity groups. Patients between ≥5 to <10 years with 27 (36%) patients were most commonly admitted into the present study.

(Table/Fig 3) shows, that the flushed facies was the most common clinical presentation with 58 (81.6%) patients followed by myalgia 53 (74.6%), headache 52 (73.2%), facial puffiness 47 (66.2%), vomiting 39 (54.9%), rash 36 (50.7%), recurrent vomiting 27 (38%), pain abdomen 27 (38%), restlessness 24 (33.8%), arthralgia 24 (33.8%), lethargy 17 (23.9%), and retro-orbital pain in 12 (16.9%) patients.

Flushed facies was the most common clinical presentation with 31 (91.17%) patients under mild, 14 (70%) moderate and 13 (76.5%) severe dengue. Facial puffiness was the second most common presenting feature with 19 (55.9%) patients under mild, followed by 11 (55%) moderate and 17 (100%) severe dengue categories. Vomiting was positive in 9 (26.4%) cases of mild, 14 (70%) moderate and 16 (94.1%) severe dengue; myalgia was found to be positive in 27 (79.4%) cases of mild, 13 (65%) moderate and 13 (76.5%) cases of severe dengue (Table/Fig 3).

Flushed facies and facial puffiness were found to be non significant across the study for the prediction of severe dengue, as shown in (Table/Fig 4). Vomiting and myalgia were found to be significant with p-value<0.05 for prediction of severe dengue.

Total patients with high risk/co-morbidities were 7 (9.9%) (as shown in (Table/Fig 5)); out of which, two patients were on immunosuppression (one patient was of idiopathic uveitis on low dose corticosteroids and methotrexate and another patient was of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome on low dose steroids, both were managed as severe dengue and discharged), three were obese (two were managed as severe and one as moderate dengue and all three were discharged) and there were two patients <1 year (one patient discharged and another admitted as a case of multiorgan damage with refractory shock with hypoglycaemia expired within four hours of hospitalisation).

Warning signs were hepatomegaly ≥2 cm BCM in 35 (49.3%) patients followed by recurrent vomiting 27 (38%), pain abdomen 27 (38%), restlessness 24 (33.8%), minor bleed 20 (28.2%) and lethargy 17 (23.9%) patients. (Table/Fig 6) shows the frequency of warning signs observed in patients with DF. Also, signs of cardiovascular collapse (as shown in (Table/Fig 6)) were cold calamities seen in 19 (26.7%) patients followed by shock 17 (23.9%), hypotension for age 17 (23.9%) and narrow pulse pressure <20 mmHg 9 (12.6%) patients.

There was a high rate of admission of mild dengue cases because of parent anxiety. The most common bleeding manifestations in the form of minor bleeds were petechiae, ecchymotic patches, gum bleeding followed by melena, bleeding from the cannula sites, haematuria and epistaxis. Severe organ involvement was seen in 11 patients, out of which five patients were having seizures (all were more than six years), two had acute respiratory distress syndrome and four patients had gallbladder wall oedema on Ultrasonography (USG) abdomen with tenderness right hypochondrium. The metabolic disturbance was noted in 12 patients (hypoglycaemia in one patient, hyponatraemia in two and ABG changes in eight patients).

On basis of the clinical spectrum for dengue illnesses; one patient was under the category of DF with a capillary leak, similarly, three patients were of DF with warning signs, six of DF with warning signs and capillary leak and 10 patients of DHFI and DHFII with minor bleeds, all these 20 patients were included under moderate dengue category. Whereas, there were eight patients of DHFIII and DHFIV (DSS), eight patients of DF with shock and one patient of dengue with significant bleeding (because no thrombocytopenia was noticed, so not included in DHF) and all these 17 patients were included under severe category as shown in (Table/Fig 7).

Platelet <1 lac/mm3 was noted in 38 patients (53.5%). The majority of patients were having platelet counts between 50,000 to 1 lac/mm3. Significant bleeding manifestations were noted in patients having platelet count between 20,000 to 50,000/mm3. Thrombocytopaenia <20,000/mm3 was not noticed in any patient, so no patient received platelet transfusion. Whole blood transfusion was given in eight patients with significant bleeding and hypotension for age with dropping haematocrit after adequate fluid resuscitation.

Other laboratory parameters like, TLC count <5000/mm3 (for leucopenia) were seen in 40 (56.3%) patients and positive tourniquet (for haemorrhagic tendencies) test was seen in 37 (52.1%) patients.

The NS1 was positive in 48 (67.6%), IgM in 40 (56.33%) and IgG (IgG+IgM positive in 14, IgG+IgM+NS1 in eight and IgG+NS1 in one patient) in 23 (32.4%) patients. Maximum cases of NS1 were detected within five days of fever onset 37 (77%). IgM was positive from the 3rd day, to the 13th day where as IgG was positive 4th to the 15th day of dengue illness. LFT was abnormal in 15 (21.1%) of patients, no patient was having ALT/AST>1000 units. Coagulation profile abnormality was positive in 22 (30.9%).

Pleural effusion was noticed in 21 (29.6%), ascites 19 (26.7%) and haematocrit showing >20% change in 27 (38%) patients and these parameters were used as evidence for capillary leaks. USG abdomen showing ascites, effusion and gallbladder wall oedema was positive in 23 (32.4%) and chest X-ray showing effusion was seen in 22 (30.9%) of patients, USG abdomen showing gall bladder wall oedema in four patients, were also having pain right hypochondrium. (Table/Fig 8) shows the profile of Investigations across dengue patients. There was nothing noteworthy among high-risk co-morbidities, warning signs for severe dengue and laboratory parameters for for the prediction of severe dengue.

Discussion

The present study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. All clinically suspected children who presented with symptoms of fever and facial puffiness, flushed facies, rash, retro-orbital pain, headache, vomiting, pain abdomen, myalgia, arthralgia or bleeding manifestations were subjected to both Dengue NS1 antigen and IgM, IgG antibody tests.

The present type of study, had never been done over the paediatric population of district kathua and its adjoining areas and will be important in providing knowledge about clinical profile of dengue patients of that area. The common age group suffering from dengue was 5 to 10 years with 27 patients (38.0%) followed by >10 years 26 (36.6%), 1 to 5 years 16 (22.5%) and <1 year 2 (2.8%) patients. In another study by Jain H, children of age group of 5-10 years were commonly affected by dengue, which is similar to the present study (7).

The total number of boys in the present study was 58 (81.7%) and the number of girls was 13 (18.3%). In a study by Kulkarni MJ et al., in which a total of 948 children were admitted with dengue out of which 671 (70.8%) were boys and 277 (29.2%) girls (16). Another study by Purkait R and Basu R, in which out of total 110 cases 69 (62.73%) were males and the remaining 41 (37.27%) were females, so there were more males than females in the present study than in comparison to others (17). More males might be affected because of more outdoor activities among males, another study by Anker M and Arima Y, have found greater male dengue incidence among both children and adults which was likely due to gender-related differences in exposure such as time away from home and participation in outdoor games (18).

Vomiting was positive in 39 (54.9%) patients and myalgia in 53 (74.6%), both of which were statistically significant for the detection of severe dengue with p-value <0.05, as shown by regression analysis. This was similar to a study done by Zhang H et al., in which p-value for vomiting was also found to be statistically significant for severe dengue prediction (19).

The NS1 was positive in 48 (67.6%), IgM in 40 (56.33%) and IgG (IgG+IgM in 14, IgG+IgM+NS1 in eight and IgG+NS1 in one patient) in 23 (32.4%) patients. Maximum cases of NS1 were detected within 5 days of fever onset (76%). IgM was positive on the 3rd to 13th day, whereas IgG was positive 4th to 15th day of dengue illness. A combination of NS1 and IgM detection in samples during the first few days is recommended, to increase the dengue diagnostic sensitivity [20,21].

The IgG was the dominant immunoglobulin in secondary dengue infections, which was noticed at higher levels even in the acute phase of secondary infections. IgM levels were comparatively lower or undetectable in secondary dengue infections than in the primary ones, as mentioned in 2009 WHO guidelines for dengue (6). However, in the present study, IgG was present along with either IgM (in the majority of cases) or IgM and NS1 or with NS1 antigen.

Revised National Guidelines for DF 2014 were applied to categorise the patients clinically into as mild (D1), moderate (D2) and severe (D3) dengue, which was much easier to understand (8), as cases were easily classified into mild, moderate and severe dengue on basis of clinical spectrum of dengue illnesses. Patients presenting with atypical manifestations of organ failure like seizures, acute respiratory distress syndrome and gall bladder wall oedema on the USG abdomen were included under the severe dengue category, which was not possible according to previous guidelines.

A total number of patients less than one year in the present study were two, both were managed as severe dengue cases, one was discharged and another was admitted as a case of multiorgan damage with deranged coagulation profile, Liver Function Test (LFT), significant bleeding, refractory shock with hypoglycaemia and expired within four hours of hospitalisation. Only one patient died out of 71 patients in the present study with a total mortality rate of 1.4%, which is consistent with the study done by Sahana KS and Sujatha R, in which two patients died, out of the total 81 patients with mortality rate of 2.5% (22).

So, from the present study it can be concluded that vomiting and myalgia were found to be helpful in early prediction of severe dengue.

Limitation(s)

Limitations of the present study were the unavailability of dengue serotype information causing the outbreak and the relatively small number of patients. So, a large multi-centre study is required in future to get familiar with the revised WHO classification for India and to know the practicability of its application.

Conclusion

The total number of patients registered in the present study were 71, children between five and 10 years were most affected by DF with the majority of cases from urban areas 65 (91.5%). Flushed facies with 81.6% was the most common clinical feature followed by myalgia 74.6% and headache 73.2%. Vomiting and myalgia were found to be statistically significant p-value <0.05 for early prediction of severe dengue. Flushed faces along with myalgia headache, facial puffiness helped in the early picking up of dengue patients in the Outpatient Department (OPD). Patients presenting with atypical manifestations of organ failure like seizures, acute respiratory distress syndrome and gall bladder wall oedema on USG abdomen were included under the severe dengue category, which was not possible according to previous guidelines.

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to the patients and their attendants for their cooperation during history taking, examination and investigations.

References

1.
Organization WH (2016). Dengue and Severe Dengue. Available online at: http:// www.who..int/medicentre/factsheet/fs117/en/. (Accessed 24 Mar 2016).
2.
Shepard DS, Undurraga EA, Halasa YA. Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(2):e2055. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Mutucumarana CP, Bodinayake CK, Nagahawatte A, Devasiri V, Kurukulasooriya R, Anuradha T, et al. Geospatial analysis of dengue emergence in rural areas in the Southern Province of Sri Lanka. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2020;114(6):408-14. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Nimmannity S. Clinical manifestation of Dengue/DHF. In: Monograph on Dengue/DHF. New Delhi; WHO Regional Publication. SEARO22. 1993:48-54.
5.
Mohan K, Malaiyan J, Nasimuddin S, Devasir RS, Meenakshi-Sundaram P, Selvaraj S, et al. Clinical profile and atypical manifestation of dengue fever cases between 2011 and 2018 in Chennai, India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(2):1119-23. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
World Health Organization, Special Programme for Research, Training in Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization. Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization. Epidemic, Pandemic Alert. Dengue: Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control. World Health Organization; 2009.
7.
Jain H. Clinical profile and outcome of dengue fever in hospitalized children of South Rajasthan, India. Int J Contemp Paediatr. 2016;3(2):546-49. [crossref]
8.
World Health Organization. National guidelines for clinical management of dengue fever. WHO Country Office for India, 2015.
9.
The National Guideline for Dengue case management during COVID-19 pandemic has been approved by Joint Monitoring Group Chaired by Dr Sunil Kumar, Director General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India on 20th October 2020.
10.
Mallhi TH, Khan AH, Sarriff A, Adnan AS, Khan YH. Patients related diagnostic delay in dengue: An important cause of morbidity and mortality. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2016;4(4):200-01. [crossref]
11.
Hadinegoro SR. The revised WHO dengue case classification: Does the system need to be modified? Paediatr Int Child Health. 2012;32(sup1):33-38. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Shewale NS. Clinical profile and outcome of children admitted for dengue with warning signs and severe dengue. MedPulse Int J Pediatr. 2017;3(1):23-27.
13.
Kadam DB, Salvi S, Chandanwale A. Expanded dengue. J Assoc Physicians India. 2016;64(7):59-63.
14.
Wali JP, Biswas A, Aggarwal P, Wig N, Handa R. Validity of tourniquet test in dengue haemorrhagic fever. J Assoc Physicians India. 1999;47(2):203-04.
15.
American Heart Association. 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) of pediatric and neonatal patients: Pediatric basic life support. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5):e989-1004. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kulkarni MJ, Sarathi V, Bhalla V, Shivpuri D, Acharya U. Clinico-epidemiological profile of children hospitalized with dengue. Indian J Pediatr. 2010;77(10):1103-07. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Purkait R, Basu R. The changing clinico-demographic profile of dengue infection in children: A hospital-based study from eastern India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2020;7(5):1901-06. [crossref]
18.
Anker M, Arima Y. Male-female differences in the number of reported incident dengue fever cases in six Asian countries. Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2011;2(2):17-23.[crossref][PubMed]
19.
Zhang H, Zhou YP, Peng HJ, Zhang XH, Zhou FY, Liu ZH, et al. Predictive symptoms and signs of severe dengue disease for patients with dengue fever: A meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:359308. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Guzman MG, Jaenisch T, Gaczkowski R, Ty Hang VT, Sekaran SD, Kroeger A, et al. Multi-country evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of two commercially-available NS1 ELISA assays for dengue diagnosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(8):e811. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Arya SC, Agarwal N, Parikh SC, Agarwal S. Simultaneous detection of dengue NS1 antigen, IgM plus IgG and platelet enumeration during an outbreak. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2011;11(4):470-76. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Sahana KS, Sujatha R. Clinical profile of dengue among children according to revised WHO classification: analysis of a 2012 outbreak from Southern India. Indian J Pediatr. 2015;82:109-13.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62502.17765

Date of Submission: Jan 14, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 01, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Mar 24, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 16, 2023
• Manual Googling: Feb 22, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Mar 23, 2023 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com