Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 19637

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : SC01 - SC04 Full Version

Morbidity and Mortality Profile of Neonates Admitted in Special Newborn Care Unit in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Retrospective Study


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62937.17617
Mahibur Rahman, Gayatri Bezboruah, Monalisa Bhoktiari

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Paediatrics, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Mahibur Rahman,
Flat No. A1, Dream Home, Bye Lane No: 3, L.N.B. Path, Po and Ps: Hatigaon, Guwahati, Assam, India.
E-mail: rahman.mahibur786@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Newborn period is the most vulnerable phase of life and deaths during first 28 days of life account for 70% of all infant deaths and 56% of all deaths of under-5 year in children. Children who die within the first 28 days of birth suffer from conditions and diseases associated with lack of quality care at or immediately after birth and in the first few days of life.

Aim: To study the morbidity and mortality profile of neonates admitted in Special Newborn Care Unit (SNCU) in a tertiary care hospital.

Materials and Methods: This hospital-based retrospective study was carried out in SNCU, Department of Paediatrics, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital (GMCH), Guwahati, Assam, India. The study period was from 1st July 2021 to 30th June 2022. A total of 7439 neonates (both inborn and outborn) from birth to 28 days of life admitted in SNCU during the study period were included in the study. Morbidity and mortality data of admitted neonates were collected from the monthly reporting format and patient records and compiled in MS Excel sheet and analysed using arithmetic mean and also expressed in percentages.

Results: During the study period, 7439 neonates were admitted in SNCU, of which, inborn were 4854 (65.3%) and outborn were 2585 (34.7%). Male and female in the study population were 4305 (57.9%) vs 3134 (42.1%) respectively. Normal birth weight and Low Birth Weight (LBW) babies were 4200 (56.5%) vs 3239 (43.5%). Term and Preterm (PT) babies 4424 (59.5%) vs 3015 (40.5%). Neonatal jaundice, birth asphyxia and neonatal sepsis were common morbidities requiring admission. Mortality was 12.1% which was higher in outborn (21.5%) than inborn (7.1%). Birth asphyxia (45.3%) was the most common cause of mortality followed by Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) with prematurity (20.4%) and neonatal sepsis (15.1%). Birth asphyxia was higher in outborn (47.5%) than inborn (41.9%). Neonatal sepsis was higher in outborn (18.3%) than inborn (9.9%). Highest number of death occured within seven days of birth (70.2%) and among LBW babies (61%).

Conclusion: Birth asphyxia, RDS with prematurity and neonatal sepsis are common causes of neonatal mortality. Outcomes of this study can be used for improving the existing healthcare services to reduce neonatal mortality.

Keywords

Birth asphyxia, Inborn, Low birth weight, Neonatal jaundice, Outborn

Globally, 130 million babies are born every year and of these, four millions die during the newborn period, i.e., first four weeks of life. Most neonatal deaths occur in first week of life (75%) and almost 25% during first 24 hours (1). The risk of mortality during neonatal period is 30-fold higher than during postneonatal period. Every year about 26 million babies (20% of global births) are born in India and almost 0.75 million die during neonatal period, which accounts for 30% global deaths (1). According to National Family Health Survey-5 (NFHS-5) data, neonatal mortality rate is 24.9 per 1000 live birth in India and 22.5 per 1000 live births in Assam (2).

The millennium development goal 4 (reducing under-5 mortality by two-thirds) cannot be achieved without substantial reduction in neonatal mortality (1). Children who die within first 28 days of birth suffer from conditions and diseases associated with lack of quality of care at or immediately after birth and in the first few days of life (3). The knowledge of morbidity and mortality profile of neonates helps in developing and strengthening health policies for reducing neonatal mortality. The morbidity and mortality profile of neonates differ in different SNCU. There is a dearth of study of morbidity and mortality profile of neonates from this region of the country. The Department of Paediatrics, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital is a tertiary care teaching hospital where patients from all the over the state of Assam including from other Medical Colleges and North East Region are being referred and cared. Hence, this study was undertaken with the following aim to study the morbidity and mortality profile of neonates admitted in SNCU.

Material and Methods

This retrospective hospital-based study was carried out in SNCU, Department of Paediatrics, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital (GMCH), Guwahati, Assam, India. Morbidity and mortality data were collected from 1st July 2021 to 30th June 2022 and the analysis of data was done from December 2022 to January 2023. Ethical clearance was obtained from Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) (No.MC/190/2007/pt-II/Dec.2022/12), GMCH.

Inclusion criteria: A total of 7439 neonates (both inborn and outborn) from birth to 28 days of life admitted in SNCU during the study period were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Still-births neonates were not admitted in SNCU were excluded from the study.

The data was analysed according to age, gender, gestation (term, preterm), birth weight {normal birth weight, LBW, Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW), Extremely Low Birth Weight (ELBW)}, causes of admissions and deaths. Inborn neonates means admitted neonates are delivered in GMCH and outborn neonates means admitted neonates are delivered outside GMCH. Hospital stay, all treatment and investigations are provided free of cost to all neonates in SNCU.

Statistical Analysis

Data was collected from the monthly reporting format and patient records and compiled in MS Excel. Data was analysed using arithmetic mean and also expressed in percentages. Percentage is used to compare one quantity against another.

Results

During the study period, a total 7439 neonates were admitted in SNCU, inborn were 4854 (65.3%) and outborn were 2585 (34.7%). The ratio of neonates of inborn and outborn was 1:9:1. The overall male and female was 4305 (57.9%) vs 3134 (42.1%) and ratio was 1:4:1.

The male and female of inborn was 2682 (55.3%) vs 2172 (44.7%) and ratio was 1:2:1. The male and female of outborn was 1623 (62.8%) vs 962 (37.2%) and ratio was 1.7:1. Results showed higher male admission in both the units (Table/Fig 1).

In the inborn unit, 2725 (56.1%) were normal birth weight (Table/Fig 1) while 2129 (43.9%) were LBW (Table/Fig 2). In the outborn unit, 1475 (57%) were normal birth weight (Table/Fig 1) while 1110 (43%) were LBW (Table/Fig 2). As per birth weight criteria overall 4200 (56.5%) were >2500 gm (normal birth weight) and 3239 (43.5%) were LBW.

As per gestation, overall 4424 (59.5%) were term babies (Table/Fig 1) and 3015 (40.5%) were PT babies (Table/Fig 3). PT babies comprised 1975 (40.7%) and 1084 (40.2%), respectively in inborn and outborn unit (Table/Fig 3). So, almost equal numbers of PT babies were admitted both in inborn and outborn unit.

In the inborn unit neonatal jaundice 2650 (54.6%) was the most common cause of admission followed by birth asphyxia 513 (10.6%). In outborn unit, birth asphyxia 891 (34.5%) was the most common cause of admission followed by sepsis 281 (10.9%). Babies having jaundice requiring phototherapy were 2650 (54.6%) in inborn and 429 (16.6%) in outborn. Overall neonatal jaundice 3079 (41.4%), birth asphyxia 1404 (18.9%) and neonatal sepsis 383 (5.1%). Neonatal sepsis 102 (2.1%) vs 281 (10.9%), RDS 157 (3.2%) vs 119 (4.6%), Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS) 74 (1.5%) vs 110 (4.2%) and major congenital malformation 58 (1.2%) vs 105 (4.1%) in inborn and outborn unit, respectively which was more in outborn babies (Table/Fig 4).

In inborn unit 4111 (84.7%) patients were discharged successfully while 165 (3.4%) patients left the SNCU against medical advice. In outborn unit 1704 (66%) patients were discharged successfully while 170 (6.6%) patients Left Against Medical Advice (LAMA). Overall LAMA was 335 (4.5%) (Table/Fig 5).

Mortality rate was overall 900 out of 7439 (12.1%) whereas in inborn unit it was 344 out of 4854 (7.1%) and outborn 556 out of 2585 (21.5%) (Table/Fig 5). Among the total 900 deaths, overall 560 (62.2%) were male and 340 (37.8%) were female. In inborn unit 201 (58.4%) were males and 143 (41.6%) were females whereas in outborn unit 359 (64.6%) were males and 197 (35.4%) were females (Table/Fig 6).

In inborn deaths male:female ratio was 1:4:1 whereas in outborn deaths male: female ratio was 1:8:1 and overall deaths male:female ratio was 1:6:1. So, in both the units male mortality was higher than female. Overall term babies were more than PT 514 (57.1%) vs 386 (42.9%) (Table/Fig 6). Among the death, 351 (39%) were normal birth weight babies and 61% were LBW babies.

Neonatal age at death shows that only 37 (10.8%) of inborn and 44 (7.9%) of outborn deaths occurs within first 24 hours of life while majority of deaths occurred between 1-7 days of life (Table/Fig 7). Study of duration between admission and death shows that most of deaths occurred between 1-3 days of admission, inborn 139 (40.4%) and outborn 266 (47.8%) (Table/Fig 7). After this period next maximum deaths were occurred in >7 days both in inborn and outborn unit (Table/Fig 7). Among all deaths 55.3% of deaths occurred within 72 hours of admission.

Birth asphyxia was the major cause of mortality which was 408 (45.3%) (inborn 41.9% and outborn 47.5%). It was followed by RDS with prematurity 184 (20.4%) (Inborn 30.8%, outborn 14%), Sepsis 136 (15.1%) (inborn 9.9%, outborn 18.3%), major congenital malformation 74 (8.2%) (inborn 7%, outborn 9%) and MAS 34 (3.8%) (inborn 2.3%, outborn 4.7%) (Table/Fig 8), respectively.

Proportionate mortality according to the birth weight was that with decreasing birth weight mortality increases significantly. Overall proportionate mortality of normal weight baby was 8.3% which increases with decreasing weight as in 1500-2499 gm babies 10.7%, 1000-1499 gm babies 34% and <1000 gm babies 56.5%. In inborn unit, mortality of normal weight baby was 3% which increases with decreasing weight as in 1500-2499 gm babies 6.3%, 1000-1499 gm babies 32.2% and <1000 gm babies 55.9%. Among outborn babies mortality in normal weight babies 18.3% which also increases with decreasing weight as in 1500-2499 gm babies 20.2%, 1000-1499 gm babies 36.4% and <1000 gm babies 57.6% of cases (Table/Fig 9).

Discussion

Neonatal jaundice, birth asphyxia and neonatal sepsis are common morbidities requiring admission. Birth asphyxia, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) with prematurity and neonatal sepsis are common causes of neonatal mortality (Table/Fig 8).

During the study period, 7439 neonates were admitted in SNCU, inborn 65.3% and outborn 34.7%. Similar findings were reported by other studies done by Kumar R et al., in Uttarakhand, India showed (inborn 60.8%, outborn 39.2%) (4). Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam, India showed (inborn 64.7%, outborn 35.2%), Randad K et al., in Mumbai, India showed (inborn 76.46%, outborn 23.54%), Mendu SB et al., in rural area of Telangana state, India showed (inborn 82.76%, outborn 17.24%), Anupama D et al., at Silchar, Asssm showed (inborn 60.5%, outborn 39.5%) and Prasanna CL et al., at Andhra Pradesh showed (inborn 58.5%, outborn 41.5%) (4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9).

There was male preponderence with 57.9% were male babies and 42.1% were female babies. Similar findings were reported from the studies done by Kumar R et al., in Uttarakhand, India (59.54% vs 40.46%), Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam (58.7% vs 41.2%), Anupama D et al., at Silchar, Assam (58.53% vs 41.38%), Sharma AK and Gaur A at Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh (63.07% vs 36.92%), Som M et al., at in Odisha (60.2% vs 39.8%) and Modi R et al., in Gujarat, India (56.36% vs 43.63%) (4),(5),(8),(10),(12). Higher number of male admissions needs to be further evaluated.

In the present study overall 43.5% babies were LBW. In other studies, the LBW admissions were Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam showed 49.8%, Anupama D et al., at Silchar, Assam showed 47.7%, Sharma AK and Gaur A at Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh showed 61.5% and Rakholia R et al., in Uttarakhand, India showed (61.6%) which was higher than the present study (5),(8),(10),(13). In the present study overall 59.5% babies were term and 40.5% were PT which was comparable to the study done by Modi R et al., in Gujarat, India showed (54.3% vs 45.7%) (12). Other studies done by Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam showed (49.4% vs 50.6%) and Rakholia R et al., in Uttarakhand, India showed (49.65% vs 50.35%), where the number of term and PT babies were almost equal (5),(13).

Neonatal Jaundice was found to be the most common cause of admission in 41.4% neonates. Similar studies were done by Kotwal YS et al., in Jammu and Kashmir, India showed neonatal jaundice 26.7% (14), Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam showed neonatal jaundice 19.9% and Anupama D et al., at Silchar Assam showed neonatal jaundice 19.04%, respectively which was lower than the present study (5),(8). Significantly higher number of jaundice babies were admitted in inborn unit (54.6% vs 16.6%). This is because the jaundice babies were diagnosed early during regular postnatal round and phototherapy started as and when required. In the present study the overall incidence of birth asphyxia was 18.9%. The study conducted by Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam showed 28.7%, and Anupama D et al., at Silchar, Assam showed 11.65% (5),(8). The incidence of births asphyxia was higher in outborn babies compared to inborn babies (outborn 34.5%, inborn 10.6%). This findings was similar with studies conducted by Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam showed (outborn 31.2%, inborn 27.3%) and Anupama D et al., at Silchar, Assam showed (outborn 13.06%, inborn 10.73%) (5),(8). It may be due to delayed referrals of high risk mothers, lack of access to health facilities, inadequate quality of antenatal, intranatal care and lack of effective neonatal resuscitation. The overall incidence of neonatal sepsis was 5.1%. Other studies done by Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam showed 10.8%, and Anupama D et al., at Silchar, Assam showed 21.61% which was higher than the present study (5),(8). The overall incidence of LAMA was 4.5% which was comparable to the studies done by Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam showed 8.1%, and Anupama D et al., at Silchar, Assam showed 4.17% [5,8].

Overall mortality rate was 12.1% which was similar with the studies done by Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam (11.4%) and Anupama D et al., in Silchar, Assam (12.37%) (5),(8). The mortality data shows much higher mortality in outborn (21.5%) compared to inborn (7.1%). Studies by Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam showed higher outborn mortality (outborn 14.3%, inborn 9.9%), and Anupama D et al., at Silchar, Assam showed higher outborn mortality (outborn 18.01%, inborn 8.69%) [5,8]. The higher outborn mortality may be due to inadequate functioning of peripheral neonatal facilities like Newborn Stabilisation Unit, delayed referral, lack of pretransport stabilisation. Gender specific mortality shows that male:female death was 62.2% vs 37.8%. The study done by Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam showed the similar trend of male:female deaths was 58.7% vs 41.2% (5). Term babies were more than PT (57.1% vs 42.9%), which was similar to study done by Kumar R et al., in Uttarakhand, India (59.6% vs 40.3%) and Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam (56.7% vs 43.2%) [4,5]. A total of 70.2% deaths occured within the first seven days of life. This was inconcordance with the study done by Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam showed 88.5%, and Anupama D et al., at Silchar, Assam showed 87.6% [5,8]. Majority of death in early neonatal period emphasises on the importance of care during early neonatal period.

On analysis of the major causes of neonatal death in SNCU it was observed that birth asphyxia contributed 41.9% deaths in inborn and 47.5% deaths in outborn and overall 45.3% deaths in SNCU. Birth asphyxia was the leading cause of death in other studies done by Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam showed overall 53.9% (inborn 57.8%, outborn 48.9%), Anupama D et al., at Silchar, Assam showed overall 50.48% (inborn 57.74%, outborn 45.11%) [5,](8).

Incidence of death due to RDS with prematurity was 20.4% which was similar to the study done by Kumar R et al., in Uttarakhand, India showed 17.5% and Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam showed 23.2% (4),(5). Overall incidence of sepsis was 15.1%. Similar findings were reported by Rahman K and Begum R, at Tezpur, Assam showed 12.4% (5). Anupama D et al., at Silchar, Assam showed 34.15% which was higher than the present study (8). Outborn unit shows high incidence of mortality due to sepsis than inborn unit (18.3% vs 9.9%). This was similar to the study done by Kumar R et al., in Uttarakhand, India showed (outborn 29.17%, inborn 24.62%), Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam showed (outborn 18.5%, inborn 7.7%), Anupama D et al., at Silchar, Assam showed (outborn 33.17%, inborn 18.76%) (4),(5),(8). High incidence of death due to sepsis in outborn may be due to unhygienic delivery practices in the periphery, lack of adequate manpower and non compliance of asepsis protocol during neonatal care. Death due to sepsis can be reduced by timely intervention. Proportionate mortality reveals that lower the birth weight higher the probability of death (>2500 gm: 8.3%, 1500-2499 gm: 10.7%, 1000-1499 gm: 34%, <1000 gm: 56.5%). Similar trend was also shown by Rahman K and Begum R at Tezpur, Assam (>2500 gm: 9.4%, 1500-2499 gm: 10.2%, 1000 gm-1499 gm: 22.1%, <1000 gm: 56.9%) (5). Outcomes of this study can be used for improving the existing healthcare services to reduce neonatal mortality. Regular training of doctors, nurses, improvement of infrastructure and adequate manpower is important to improve neonatal outcome.

Limitation(s)

The present study was a hospital-based retrospective study. Therefore, the present study could not analyse the epidemiological factors, socio-economic background, antenatal, intranatal and postnatal factors that could have influenced the outcome.

Conclusion

The present study shows that neonatal jaundice, birth asphyxia and neonatal sepsis are common morbidities requiring admission. Birth asphyxia is the most common cause of mortality followed by RDS with prematurity and neonatal sepsis. Improvement of maternal health, proper antenatal, intranatal and neonatal care and timely intervention by referral to tertiary centres will help to improve neonatal outcome.

References

1.
Singh M. Care of the New Born: Introduction to care of newborn babies. Ninth edition. New Delhi: CBS Publ: 2021. Pp. 1-4.
2.
International Institute for population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. 2020. National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-5, State and District Factsheets, Assam. Mumbai: IIPS. Available from: https://nhm.assam.gov.in/sites/default/files/swf_utility_folder/ departments/nhm_lipl_in_oid_6/menu/document/factsheet_as.pdf 12-Dec-2020.
3.
World Health Organization. Newborn Mortality. Available from: https://www.who. int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/levels-and-trends-in-child-mortality-report- 2021. [Assessed on 28-Jan-2022].
4.
Kumar R, Mundhra R, Jain A, Jain S. Morbidity and mortality profile of neonates admitted in special newborn care unit of a teaching Hospital in Uttarakhand, India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2019;17(1):241-46. [crossref]
5.
Rahman K, Begum R. Morbidity and mortality profile of neonates admitted in a special care newborn unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital of Assam, India. The New Indian Journal of OBGYN. 2020;7(1):82-87. [crossref]
6.
Randad K, Choudhary D, Garg A, Jethaliya R. Pattern of neonatal morbidity and mortality: A retrospective study in a special newborn care unit, Mumbai. Indian J Child Health. 2020;7:299-303. [crossref]
7.
Mendu SB, Kota V, Neela AR, Bukkapatnam SB. Morbidity and mortality profile of neonates admitted in special newborn care unit in tertiary care centre in rural area of Telangana State, India. Int J Sci Stud. 2021;9(8):25-30.
8.
Anupama D, Bidyut BN, Anjana TN. Morbidity and mortality profile of newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital of Assam. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2020;8:697-702.
9.
Prasanna CL, Suneetha B, Prabhu GR, Prakash PS. Morbidity and mortality pattern among babies admitted in special newborn care unit, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2019;6:1898-903. [crossref]
10.
Sharma AK, Gaur A. profile of neonatal mortality in special newborn care unit of tertiary care hospital. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2019;6:4205. [crossref]
11.
Som M, Nayak C, Padhi BK, Ashwani N. Patterns of morbidity among newborns admitted in SNCU of Odisha, India. Int J health Sci Res. 2018;8(9):10-19.
12.
Modi R, Modi B, Patel JK, Punitha KM. Study of the morbidity and the mortality pattern in the neonatal intensive care unit at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Gandhinagar District, Gujarat, India. J Res Med Den Sci. 2015;3(3): 208-12. [crossref]
13.
Rakholia R, Rawat V, Bano M, Singh G. Neonatal morbidity and mortality of sick newborns admitted in a teaching hospital of Uttarakhand. CHRISMED J health Res. 2014;1(4):228-34. [crossref]
14.
Kotwal YS, Yatoo GH, Ahmed Jan FA. Morbidity and mortality among neonates admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital of Jammu and Kashmir, India. Neonat Pediatr Med. 2011;3(2):136.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62937.17617

Date of Submission: Jan 17, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 11, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Mar 21, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 18, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 15, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 17, 2023 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com