Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 74320

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : PR01 - PR03 Full Version

Limberg Transposition Flap in Primary Pilonidal Sinus- A Case Series


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63105.17759
T Jeyalaksmi, E Shenbaga Seetha Priya

1. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Government Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Government Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
T Jeyalakshmi,
157/4, Golden Jubilee Flats, Padikuppam Road, Annanagar West, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: jeyatr@gmail.com

Abstract

Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus (PS) is common among the young male adult population. There are multiple treatment options available ranging from non medical and surgical procedures. Medical management is not in vogue. This case series is about 10 patients with a common manifestation of serous discharge from the sinus in the sacrococcygeal region. The patients warranted a definitive cure for their condition. Though not life-threatening, it is socially embarrassing and adversely affects the quality of life in terms of education and livelihood among the young. The Limberg flap technique was advocated in all these patients, only one out of 10 patients showed wound infection. All the patients were satisfied with the surgical outcome. The surgical choices varied from simple excision to flap procedures. Overall the Limberg (rhomboid) flap technique has fewer postoperative complications and low recurrence rate and has a shorter learning curve, and is emerging as the standard of care.

Keywords

Rhomboid, Sacrococcygeal region, Wound infection

Pilonidal sinus in Latin means “nest of hairs”. It is commonly seen in young adults and hirsute males. The prevalence in Asia is roughly 6.6% whereas in the Unites States of America (USA) it is 26/1,00,000 (1). The pathogenesis of the disease theory has evolved over the years from congenital to a definitive acquired aetiology. The three main factors responsible were high quantity of hair, extreme force and vulnerability to infection (2). Multiple subcutaneous sinuses and abscess formation occur following secondary infection.

Recurrence of the disease is the primordial challenge currently. The Limberg technique is employed to avoid recurrence which mainly incorporates a flap procedure that achieves primarily an off-midline closure and obliterates the natal cleft. Surgical treatment options widely practised are excision of the sinus tracts with primary closure or secondary healing (2),(3).

Case Report

A total of 10 patients of primary chronic pilonidal sinus who underwent Limberg flap technique in the General Surgery Department from February 2021 to February 2022 and with a median follow-up duration of one year were included (Table/Fig 1). The mean age of all the patients was 26.5 years.

All the patients were diagnosed only clinically. The presenting symptoms of all the 10 patients in this case series had reported minimal serous discharge from the sinuses, lasting for 5-10 days. However, the disease had a waxing and waning course for nearly 1-2 years. On visual inspection, the sinus openings were identified in the midline natal cleft in single tracts. Only one patient with multiple tracts had a secondary tract 1 cm lateral to the midline (Table/Fig 2). All the primary sinus openings were positioned within 5-8 cm in the midline.

All the patients had been preoperatively assessed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for any foci of abscess. The standard protocol for surgery was adhered and preoperative i.v. ceftriaxone 1 gm was administered.

The patient was placed in a jack-knife position following spinal anaesthesia. The buttocks were retracted by adhesive tapes for exposure of the operative site. The surgical site was sterilised with 10% povidone-iodine.

Methylene blue dye was injected into the sinus. The rhomboid excision was done including all the sinus orifices in the centre.

The line AC was drawn with a ruler and marker pen at an angle of 60 degrees (Table/Fig 3). The line BD angle was 120 degrees. The line BD transects the line AC at 60% of the AC distance. {e.g., if AC=10 cm, BD transects at 6 cm of AC}. The line BC was convexly marked and the line DC was concavely placed to lateralise the lower end of the flap (point C) avoiding the inter gluteal cleft (Table/Fig 4). The rhomboid excision dissection was performed with both scalpel and monopolar diathermy up to the presacral fascia. The transposition flap DE and EF was fashioned including the skin, subcutaneous tissue and gluteal fascia (Table/Fig 5), (Table/Fig 6). The flap edges were reassessed for vascularity to avoid flap necrosis. The subcutaneous tissue was approximated with vicryl 2 ‘O’ after placing a negative pressure drain (Table/Fig 7). The skin was sutured with prolene 3 ‘O’. The flap closure was to be tension free. The patients were nursed in the prone position in the postoperative period. The suction drain was removed on the 5th Postoperative Day (POD) after the discharge was <20 mL per day. Sutures were removed from the 12th to 14th POD.

Only one patient out of the 10 patients had reported minimal wound infection and it was due to the wider excision (Rhomboid) of the primary area in view of multiple sinuses (Table/Fig 8). There were no cases of flap necrosis/reoccurrences.

Discussion

The Limberg or Rhomboid flap reconstruction, which has been employed in present case series, has several advantages. It was initially designed by Dr Alexander Limberg in 1948. This design minimised the tension produced with the mobilisation of the flap to its new position. The Limberg flap, and its modifications are associated with extremely low recurrence rates (less than 5% in most studies), minimal complications, and good patient acceptance (4),(5). In a similar study by Jawade KK and Bande V, the results are comparable in terms of minor wound infection, only one patient had reported out of 10 patients (6). Another study by Jain AKC and Thambuchetty N, also with a case series of nine patients had a complication rate of 15.79% vs present case series of 10% (7).

It is suitable for treating recurrent disease as well as with multiple sinuses, since a wide excision area is plausible. Another factor which has a beneficial impact is drain placement, which contributes to faster healing time (7). The armamentarium of the general surgeons in cases of pilonidal disease includes several procedures. Acute PS disease is managed with incision and drainage of the abscess, which is associated with 15-40% recurrence rate (8). These patients later require a second definitive procedure. The most popular technique practised by surgeons is the local excision with no primary closure, which has a prolonged healing time due to secondary intention of wound healing. The healing process is about 1-3 months and there is a delayed return to work. The recurrence rate ranges from 2%-35% (8),(9). Among the techniques for reconstruction after wide excision are the Karydakis flaps, the Limberg flap, the Bascom flap, the V-Y advancement flap. Bascom cleft lip procedure is a simpler technique which includes only the excision of midline pits and avoiding removal of deep tissues (10). Modified Limberg flap is an off midline closure technique, the cephalic and caudal apex of the rhomboid is placed 2 cm from the midline, in contrast to classical Limberg flap where the apices are in the midline (11).

Many surgical procedures have been described for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease but a consensus on the single most effective modality has not been advocated because all procedures involve complications and recurrences (8),(12). It has been widely accepted that use of flap technique by flattening and lateralisation of the natal cleft will avoid recurrence. The Karydakis technique has difficulty in mobilisation and closure for complex disease. Z-plasty and Y-V advancement flaps cover the wound defect by moving full thickness skin and subcutaneous tissue into the midline defect (8),(12).

Among the flap techniques Modified Limberg flap procedure is reported to be safer and reliable technique in treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease with low complications and recurrence rates. It flattens the natal cleft with a large, well vascularised pedicle and is a particularly useful technique for complex sinuses with multiple pits and extended tracts when radical excision leaves a large defect [9,11]. Contrary to these results, a study showed Karydakis flap superior to Limberg flap (8). Limberg flap is superior to open excision with secondary healing [12,13]. In present cases, the healing was reasonably good in all cases in the first week after surgery which is supported by the shorter hospital stay.

Conclusion

Rhomboid excision with the Limberg transposition flap technique is observed to be a safe modality for the management of primary pilonidal disease and also includes multiple sinuses. It has fewer postoperative complications and a shorter hospital stay.

Acknowledgement

Special thanks to Dr. Bhavik Shah for the technical help.

References

1.
Duman K, Girgin M, Harlak A. Prevalence of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease in Turkey. Asian J Surg. 2017;40(6):434-37. Doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 May 14. PMID: 27188235. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Kang AS, Kang KS. Rhomboid flap: Indications, applications, techniques and results. A comprehensive review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;68:102544. Doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102544. PMID: 34285803; PMCID: PMC8278203. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Aithal SK, Rajan CS, Reddy N. Limberg flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus a safe and sound procedure. Indian J Surg. 2013;75(4):298-301. Doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0489-5. Epub 2012 May 6. PMID: 24426457; PMCID: PMC3726804. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Boshnaq M, Phan YC, Martini I, Harilingam M, Akhtar M, Tsavellas G. Limberg flap in management of pilonidal sinus disease: Systematic review and a local experience. ActaChir Belg. 2018;118(2):78-84. Doi: 10.1080/00015458.2018.1430218. Epub 2018 Feb 1. PMID: 29390948. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Topgül K. Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with rhomboid flap. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24(1):07-12. Doi: 10.1111/j.1468- 3083.2009.03350.x. Epub 2009 Jul 13. PMID: 19627408. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Jawade KK, Bande V. Study of clinical profile, surgical interventions and out- come in a series of patients with pilonidal disease. IntSurg J. 2019;6:4512-16. [crossref]
7.
Jain AKC, Thambuchetty N. Management of pilonidal sinus disease: A 5 years retrospective analysis. Int Surg J. 2016;3(2):586-88. [crossref]
8.
Kumar NA, Sutradhar P. Karydakis procedure for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: Our experience. Indian journal of plastic surgery: Official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. 2014;47(3):40. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Karaca T, Yoldas¸ Ö, Bilgin BÇ, Özer S, Yoldas¸ S, Karaca NG. Comparison of short-term results of modified Karydakis flap and modified Limberg flap for pilonidal sinus surgery. International Journal of Surgery. 2012;10(10):601-06. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Rabea M. Bascom’s cleft lift versus rhomboid flap procedure for the management of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. The Egyptian J of Surgery. 2015;34(3):146-51. [crossref]
11.
Khan KJ, Ghaffar A, Choudhary S, Irshad K. Comparison of early outcome between modified limberg and karydakis flap procedures in patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. PJMHS. 2016;10(2):631-34.
12.
Singh PK, Gohil RK, Saxena N. Limberg flap procedure for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: A prospective study. Int Surg J. 2017;4(7):2238-42. [crossref]
13.
Ray K, Albendary M, Baig MK, Swaminathan C, Sains P, Sajid MS. Limberg flap for the management of pilonidal sinus reduces disease recurrence compared to Karydakis and Bascom procedure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Chir. 2020;75(5):355-64. Doi: 10.23736/ S0026-4733.20.08362-5. Epub 2020 Sep 25. PMID: 32975384.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63105.17759

Date of Submission: Jan 26, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 14, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Mar 13, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 30, 2023
• Manual Googling: Feb 25, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 09, 2023 (7%)

Etymology: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com