Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 37695

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : PD01 - PD05 Full Version

Management of Scrotal Aggressive Angiomyxoma: A Case Report


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60760.17742
R Lakshmana, Jayakumar, N Snigdha, Neethish K Paul, PA Sethu Raman

1. Professor, Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of Surgical Oncology, SRM Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Postgraduate, Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Senior Resident, Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Neethish K Paul,
Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College and Research Institute, SRM Nagar, Potheri Village, Kattankulathur, Chennai-603203, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: neethisp@srmist.edu.in

Abstract

Aggressive Angiomyxoma is most commonly identified as a slow growing mesenchymal neoplasm most commonly seen in women than in men. It has a marked tendency for local recurrence but with low instances of metastasis. Radiological investigations may assist in arriving at a provisional diagnosis and provide an arbitrary idea about the margins of the tumour but the gold standard diagnosis is always be histopathological examination. Surgery is the first line and the most reliable form of treatment. However, around 40-70% of patients came with complaints of recurrence. This is a case of a 61-year-old male patient who came with complaints of scrotal swelling which increased in size over a period of six months. The swelling was firm in consistency without warmth or tenderness. Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CE-MRI) was taken to discern the borders of the mass and it was suspected to be a soft tissue sarcoma. Mass was excised in toto and a confirmatory diagnosis of aggressive angiomyxoma was made only after postoperative histopathological examination. The patient was on regular follow-up for eight months to date and no evidence of local recurrence was detected. This case report presents to be a curious case as aggressive angiomyxomas are usually tumours seen in females. It also describes the management of scrotal swelling without a preoperative diagnosis.

Keywords

Histopathological examination, Mesenchymal neoplasm, Metastasis, Recurrence

Case Report

A 61-year-old male came with complaints of scrotal swelling for six months. There was a gradual increase in size, without complaints of pain. The patient neither had complaints of fever, abdominal pain, altered bowel or bladder habits, loss of weight, loss of appetite, chest pain, or breathlessness. The patient had no known co-morbidities and had no history of any previous surgery.

On general examination, the patient had no pallor, no icterus, no pedal oedema. Vitals were stable. Systemic examination was normal. On local examination, a 6×5 cm in size, cystic, non tender, non transilluminant, irreducible swelling was palpated in the Bilateral (B/L) scrotum extending into the perineum. The skin over the swelling had minimal rugosities. No cough impulse (Table/Fig 1). B/L testes were palpated separately. Penis was in midline.

Routine blood investigations were done. Tumour markers like Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA), Cancer Antigen (CA) 19-9, CA242 and CA125 were negative. Initial radiological evaluation was done at another centre. Ultrasonography (USG) scrotum showed it to be an extra testicular mass. No other findings were described through the ultrasound. Computed Tomography (CT) abdomen was done to further confirm the swelling to be extratesticular. It showed a heterogeneously enhancing extratesticular mass of 9.4×5.6 cm in the right scrotum (Table/Fig 2).

The MRI showed a 14.5×7.8×5.1 cm hyperintense, T1 isointense partially fat suppressible lesion noted in the right ischiorectal fossa extending inferior to the root of penis and displacing the penis left laterally entering the root of the scrotum (Table/Fig 3).

Due to financial constraints on the patient’s part, a repeat of the previous investigations was avoided. To get a better orientation regarding the origin and the structures around the tumour a CE-MRI was done at the tertiary care centre.

The CE-MRI showed a right perianal/perineal mass lesion of size 13.7×8.3×5.05 cm (AP×CC×TR), hyperintense noted in the right ischiorectal fossa and ischioanal fossa extending anteriorly along the perineum into the posterior border of the scrotum. It was seen abutting the anterior wall of the anal canal, the root of the penis, and scrotum without any evidence of local infiltration. Suspected to be a myxoid/spindle cell neoplasm (Table/Fig 4).

To rule out pelvic herniation before proceeding with surgical excision of the tumour, sigmoidoscopy and cystoscopy were done and it was confirmed that bowel or bladder were not the contents.

The patient was taken up for surgery and through a trans-scrotal incision, the mass was excised in toto and sent for histopathological examination (Table/Fig 5). Gross pathology showed a soft tissue mass of size 13×7×3 cm with a grey white external surface. The cut surface was grey white, homogeneous, soft, gelatinous, solid area. No necrosis or haemorrhage was noted (Table/Fig 6).

Microscopy showed an encapsulated infiltrative hypocellular lesion composed of spindle shaped tumour cells with delicate cytoplasmic processes and bland nuclear chromatin. No evidence of atypia or increase in mitosis was detected. The tumour cells were embedded in a myxoid stroma with scattered delicate collagen fibers. Focal areas showed entrapped mature adipose tissue within the stroma.

Numerous small and medium sized thick walled hyalinised blood vessels were also seen. Attached skeletal muscle bundle also was noted (Table/Fig 7).

Based on the above microscopic findings, a diagnosis of aggressive angiomyxoma was made amongst other differential diagnoses such as superficial angiomyxoma, angiomyofibroblastoma, myxoid neurofibroma, myxoid smooth muscle tumour and myxoid liposarcoma. Aggressive angiomyxoma is an unencapsulated, hypocellular and a locally infiltrative tumour. Stellate to spindle cells with small capillary sized blood vessels with a myxoid stroma and abundant thin and thick walled blood vessels are seen. Superficial angiomyxomas were ruled out as they mostly composed of epidermoid or squamoid elements are evident. Angiomyofibroblastoma on the other hand show epithelioid to plasmacytoid tumour cells. Myxoid neurofibromas portray a characteristic feature of buckled nuclei. Typical cigar-shaped nuclei are seen with eosinophilic cytoplasm in myxoid smooth muscle tumours. Lipoblasts, plexiform vasculature with less differentiated round cell component are key features of myxoid liposarcomas. Each of these tumours has specific microscopic features that differentiate them from each other despite their similar clinical features and gross features. Spindle shaped tumour cells with delicate cytoplasmic processes with evidence of infiltrative nature are the key features of aggressive angiomyxoma that differentiate it from the rest of the differential diagnosis.

The patient was discharged six days after surgery. The patient is on follow-up for the past eight months and is asymptomatic. The wound site is healthy and no local swelling was palpated on examination. An ultrasound of the scrotal region is planned after one year of surgery to rule out recurrence. No specific medications have been given.

Discussion

Aggressive angiomyxoma is a rare benign mesenchymal tumour most commonly occurring in the pelvic soft tissues and perineum of women more often than in men [1-5]. Aggressive angiomyxoma was first described by Steeper TA and Rosai J in 1983 (6). The term “aggressive angiomyxoma” was chosen for this neoplasm to emphasise the neoplastic nature of the blood vessels and its locally infiltrative and recurrent nature (6). Aggressive angiomyxoma shows female predominance, as less than 100 male cases have been reported (1),(3),(5),(6),(7). In men, aggressive angiomyxoma usually arises from the pelviperineal tissue mostly involving scrotum and sometimes involving the bladder. The tumour originates most commonly from the scrotum (42%), pelvis (11%), perineum (10%) and rarely from the groin (9%), spermatic cord (5%) and prostate (4%) [1,2,7]. Tabulation was made comparing the key features of a case such as this with others across the world (Table/Fig 8) (1),(2),(3),(4).

The clinical appearance of aggressive angiomyxoma differs according to the site and size of the lesion but usually presents as painless swelling over a stated time in the scrotum.

Misdiagnosis have been recognised as testicular neoplasm, inguinal hernia, hydrocele, or spermatocele [1,8]. Aggressive angiomyxoma in the prostate causes lower urinary symptoms, while in other regions presents with the symptoms of mass that compress the neighbouring organs. Physical examination in most cases reveals a firm, non tender and non transilluminated mass (1),(2),(9). USG is usually the first choice for screening pelvic lesions before performing further imaging techniques. Aggressive angiomyxoma lesions were found to be irregular, heterogeneous and hypoechoic masses with a large region of involvement and relatively well-defined margins. The lesions had intermediate to high echogenicity with a layered or swirled arrangement. The testicles and epididymis commonly demonstrated normal echogenicity and vascularity (1),(2),(3),(9),(10),(11). A finger like growth pattern on the ultrasonic imaging indicated aggressive growth into surrounding tissues (9).

The MRI provides a better insight in identifying the characteristics of such mesenchymal tumours, including isointense or hypointense characteristics on T1-weighted images and hyperintense characteristics on T2-weighted images. The swirled sign observed on both USG and MRI has also been mentioned in a recent study (1),(3),(10),(11). Typical CT features are a mass hypodense or isodense to muscle with well-defined margins that show variable enhancement on administration of intravenous contrast. Considering that the appearance of the tumour is unspecific on a CT, the suspected diagnosis must be based again on the characteristic morphology and localisation of the mass, and should be complemented with MRI. Angiography shows a hypo attenuating mass. The tumour tends to grow around the structures of the pelvic floor without penetrating the muscles. They can increase in size, infiltrate the surrounding tissue but do not show the tendency to metastasise (12).

In most cases, the diagnosis of this tumour was made when here was a local recurrence or when an intraoperative frozen section was sent for histopathological examination. In addition, none of these radiologic investigations can discriminate aggressive angiomyxoma from different malignancies, including sarcomas (1),(9),(10).

Hence, although detailed radiological investigations such as USG, CT and MRI assist in delineating the margins of the tumour, preoperative diagnosis of aggressive angiomyxoma can be extremely challenging (1),(2),(3),(7),(10),(12),(13). Wide surgical excision is the treatment of choice, including broad free margins around the tumour in the area of resection. This can be tricky because the consistency of the tumour tissue the same as the adjacent tissue (1),(9),(14). To avoid incomplete resection of the tumour, a thorough radiological investigation is important, which was performed in this case.

Gross sections of the postoperative specimens of these tumours are soft, partly circumscribed with a gelatinous appearance on the cut section. Microscopically, aggressive angiomyxomas consist of mesenchymal uniform spindle shaped or stellate cells embedded in a loose myxoid and collagenous stroma with abundant fibroblasts, myofibroblasts and variably sized vessels. Angiomyxomas show low mitotic activity with an absence of nuclear atypia, which corresponds with our histology (1),(2),(3),(6),(10). The most decisive immunohistochemistry profile, in reference to various studies, is the positivity of Vimentin and Cluster of Differentiation 34 (CD34) with the negativity of S-100. Mammary Serum Antigen (MSA), Smooth Muscle Actin (SMA), and Desmin are of medium sensitivity and specificity because they reported positivity in about 50% of the cases. Smooth muscle actin highlights myoid bundles and was found to be positive in individual tumour cells [2-4]. Stunningly, Estrogen Receptor (ER) and Progesterone Receptor (PR) receptors reacted positively in 50% of cases (n=32), even when the tumour was in men (2),(15). One or both of these hormone receptors displays strong nuclear positivity in most of the tumour cells. This proposes a hormonal effect on the tumour growth and may arise from specialised cells of the stroma of the perineum. Thus, hormonal therapy might be useful as an adjuvant treatment (1),(15). Labeling for Ki-67 consistently demonstrates a low proliferative index (<1% of tumour cells) (8). Chromosomal translocation of the 12q13-15 band involving the HMGA2 gene has been described (15).

Aggressive angiomyxomas should be distinguished from other benign tumours affecting the pelvis and the genital tract, such as intramuscular myxoma, myxoid neurofibroma, myxoid or spindle cell lipoma, superficial angiomyxoma, angiomyofibroblastoma and angiomyolipoma. One should also consider some malignant tumours with myxoid stroma, such as myxoid liposarcoma, myxoid malignant fibrous histiocytoma, and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (2),(3),(4),(10).

Since, the consistency of an aggressive angiomyxoma is similar to that of local tissue, a gross margin clearance during surgery is difficult to achieve which in turn leads to a high propensity for local recurrence. A strict follow-up should be maintained to detect local recurrence in the early stages. Studies have referred to a high local recurrence rate between 35% and 72%, but no metastasis has been reported to date in men (1),(3),(10),(16). Since, metastasis is exceedingly rare, the prognosis is considered good (15).

Follow-up duration ranged from 1-144 months and MRI is the preferred method for detecting recurrences (11). Ultrasound can also be applied for follow-up of patients after surgery, considering financial constraints (1),(9).

However, most recent literature review revealed no differences in recurrence between the patients with negative margins and those with positive margins (15). These results may be explained by the locally infiltrative nature of aggressive angiomyxoma. As this tumour may express Estrogen Receptor (ER) and Progesterone Receptor (PR), hormonal neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy have been attempted in woman with aggressive angiomyxomas and a decrease in tumour size was observed in several reported cases (1),(17). These results establish a future type of therapy for such benign tumours. Four cases in men were reported using hormonal therapy with Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist either as adjuvant therapy to prevent recurrence or to manage recurrence before proceeding with a repeat surgery (10),(18),(19),(20). Additionally, many studies have showed promising results of using a single monthly 3.75 mg injection of leuprolide acetate, an agonist of (GnRH), for treatment of these lesions (1),(13).

Vascular embolisation can diminish tumours by blocking their blood supply. It can also reduce intraoperative bleeding and operation risk. But, the tumour blood supply may come from multiple arteries, so the rapid development of alternative blood supply in tumour after embolisation may lead to the recurrence. Therefore, it is difficult to completely destroy tumours by embolisation alone, which is usually used for surgical adjuvant therapy (3).

Conclusion

This case report gives a broad perspective on the occurrence, presentation and the preferred treatment plan for a patient with testicular tumours without a clear pre operative diagnosis. Though, resection of the tumour is the preferred mode of treatment, personalised treatment strategies assist in achieving a good clearance margin. Resection of the tumour with a good clearance margin proved to be an important step in the treatment in this case even though the diagnosis of the tumour was not known. Patient should be explained about high chances of local recurrence and the importance of a regular follow-up to detect any local recurrence at the earliest should be stressed upon.

References

1.
Sabbagh AJ, Arnaout K, Arnaout AY, Toutounji B, Ghabreau L, Ayoub K, et al. (2022). Aggressive angiomayxoma in men: Case report and systematic review. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2012;79:103880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. amsu.2022.103880. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Sun J, Lian PH, Ye ZX, Dong X, Ji ZG, Wen J, et al. Aggressive angiomyxoma in the scrotum: A case series and literature review. Frontiers in surgery. 2022;9:762212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.762212. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Law YX, Tan JH, Lee KC. Aggressive angiomyxoma of scrotum in a man: A case report and literature review of 73 cases of aggressive angiomyxoma in men. J Integr Nephrol Androl. 2018;5:80-84. [crossref]
4.
Nyandwi L, Idrissa S, Moustapha H, Ada MOA, Boubacar E, Boubacar I, et al. Aggressive angiomyxoma as a rare cause of scrotum enlargement in a 10- month-old boy: A case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2022;16(1):293. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-022-03497-2. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Hastak MS, Raghuvanshi SR, Sahu S, Vyankatesh A, Ramraje SN, Ranjan A. Aggressive angiomyxoma in men. J Assoc Physicians India. 2008;56:373-75.
6.
Steeper TA, Rosai J. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the female pelvis and perineum. Report of nine cases of a distinctive type of gynecologic soft-tissue neoplasm. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 1983;7(5):463-75. https://doi. org/10.1097/00000478-198307000-00009. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Ismail MI, Wong YP, Tan GH, Fam XI. Paratesticular aggressive angiomyxoma: A rare case. Urology Annals. 2017;9(2):197-99. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_168_16. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Fetsch JF, Laskin WB, Lefkowitz M, Kindblom LG, Meis-Kindblom JM. Aggressive angiomyxoma: A clinicopathologic study of 29 female patients. Cancer. 1996;78(1):79-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0142(19960701)78:1<79::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-4. 3.0.CO;2-4>[crossref]
9.
Zhao CY, Su N, Jiang YX, Yang M. Application of ultrasound in aggressive angiomyxoma: Eight case reports and review of literature. World Journal of Clinical Cases. 2018;6(14):811-19. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.811. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Rocco F, Cozzi G, Spinelli MG, Rocco BM, Albo G, Finkelberg E, et al. Massive recurring angiomyxoma of the scrotum in an obese man. Rare tumours. 2011;3(3):e31. https://doi.org/10.4081/rt.2011.e31. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Tariq R, Hasnain S, Siddiqui MT, Ahmed R. Aggressive angiomyxoma: Swirled configuration on ultrasound and MR imaging. JPMA: The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2014;64(3):345-48.
12.
Miguez Gonzalez J, Dominguez Oronoz R, Lozano Arranz P, Calaf Forn F, Barrios Sanchez P, Garcia Jimenez A. Aggressive angiomyxoma: imaging findings in 3 cases with clinicopathological correlation and review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 2015;39(6):914-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/ RCT.0000000000000305. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Poirier M, Fraser R, Meterissian S. Case 1. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the pelvis: Response to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2003;21(18):3535-36. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.10.174. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Wiser A, Korach J, Gotlieb WH, Fridman E, Apter S, Ben-Baruch G. Importance of accurate preoperative diagnosis in the management of aggressive angiomyxoma: Report of three cases and review of the literature. Abdominal Imaging. 2006;31(3):383-86. Doi: 10.1007/s00261-005-0378-5. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Sutton BJ, Laudadio J. Aggressive angiomyxoma. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2012;136(2):217-21. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2011- 0056-RS. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kondo T. Aggressive angiomyxoma in the inguinal region: A case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2010;4:396. Doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-4-396. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Medina JFC, Ibáñez Javier A, Heinz O, Martínez Carlos E. Aggressive angiomyxoma in men: Clinical case report and literature review. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol. 2011;26(4):304-10. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/ scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-99572011000400010&lng=en.
18.
Karwacki GM, Stöckli M, Kettelhack C, Mengiardi B, Studler U. Radiographic diagnosis and differentiation of an aggressive angiomyxoma in a male patient. Journal of Radiology Case Reports. 2013;7(7):01-06. https://doi.org/10.3941/ jrcr.v7i7.1154. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Mathur A, Yadav A, Jasuja S, Jindal A, Malhotra H. Aggressive angiomyxoma perineum: A rare soft tissue neoplasm in males. Indian Journal of Cancer. 2015;52(4):589. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-509X.178398. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Damodaran S, Gengan D, Walling ST. Aggressive angiomyxoma involving penis and urethra-a case report. Urology Case Reports. 2017;13:110-12. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eucr.2017.03.019.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60760.17742

Date of Submission: Oct 16, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 01, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 21, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 20, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 22, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 20, 2023 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com