Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 69174

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : PC41 - PC44 Full Version

Short-Term Outcomes of Fibrin Glue Versus Absorbable Tackers for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic TAPP Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomised Clinical Trial


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61047.17904
R Manish, Tharun Ganapathy Chitrambalam, Vikram Yogish, Nidhi George, S Gowsick, Akhil Avirneni

1. Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery, Srm Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of General Surgery, Srm Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor, Department of General Surgery, Srm Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery, Srm Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery, Srm Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 6. Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery, Srm Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
R Manish,
Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Potheri, Kattankulathur, Chennai-603203, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: manishmarlecha97@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Hernia is defined as the protrusion of all or part of a viscus through the wall that contains it. Laparoscopic and tension-free open repairs are the two procedures that are being performed globally in inguinal hernia surgery.

Aim: To compare the benefits of fibrin glue versus absorbable tackers in laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair and to appraise their outcomes.

Materials and Methods: A randomised clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital of SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India for 18 months, from March 2021 to August 2022. Total of 54 patients who had laparoscopic TAPP hernia repairs were divided into two groups each with 27 participants, group A mesh fixed using fibrin glue and group B mesh fixed using absorbable tackers. All the patients were followed-up for atleast three months postsurgery. Operating time, postoperative pain and complications data were collected. The Chi-square and Unpaired t-test determined the statistical significance of the data.

Results: Total of 54 patients aged 18-60 years were included in the study with no significant differences (p-value=0.696). The same was true for gender (11 males and 43 females), with no significant differences (p-value=0.735) in group A and group B between male and female patients. In current study, there was a statistically significant difference in pain levels between groups after 24 hours, (group B: 5.33±1.30 and group A: 6.56±0.51) however, after 48 hours (group B: 4.07±0.87 and group A: 4.63±0.49) and 72 hours (group B: 2.74±0.76 and group A: 2.63±0.49), there was no significant difference in the severity of the pain between the groups. At one week follow-up the level of pain score was significantly different. There was also a significant difference in haematoma between groups (p-value=0.038). In addition, there was a significant difference in return to normal activities in one week (p-value=0.033), two weeks (p-value=0.022), and four weeks between groups (p-value=0.019).

Conclusion: The use of fibrin sealant for mesh fixation in TAPP surgery has superior short-term outcomes when compared to tackers in terms of postoperative pain, return to normal activities and reduced incidence of haematomas.

Keywords

Minimally invasive hernia surgery, Totally extra peritoneal repair, Transabdominal preperitoneal repair

Hernia is an abnormal protrusion of a viscus through the wall of a cavity which normally contains it (1). The most common kind of groin hernia is an inguinal hernia (2). It happens when a defect in the lower abdominal wall allows abdominal tissue, such as omentum or an intestinal loop, to protrude through. An inguinal hernia that is uncomfortable or growing larger might be treated surgically. Surgery is the definitive management for inguinal hernias (3),(4).

Laparoscopic and tension-free open repair procedures are two procedures that are being mastered globally in inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia surgery has progressed beyond a straight forward repair of the defect to reinforce the wall using prosthetics. The management of recurrence was challenging for surgeons since tissue healing was linked to a high recurrence rate. The development of tissue reinforcement mesh represented a revolution in hernia surgery (5),(6). The advantage of mesh repair over suture repair has been established by meta-analysis that compares the two types of repairs (7). Several studies that showed significant recurrence rates for laparoscopic hernia surgery caused controversy at first [8,9]. But over the past ten years, laparoscopic surgery for hernia repair has improved outcomes by lowering chronic pain, recurrence rates, and allowing patients to resume regular activities faster (10).

Staples are considered the primary source of nerve damage in TAPP induce persistent pain. The fixation of the mesh over the muscle during the use of a spiral group B increases the risk of damage to the ilio-hypogastric nerve. These complications led surgeons to turn to alternative fixing techniques, including cyanoacrylate and human group A. Group A is a commercial tissue adhesive that contains thrombin and fibrinogen. The commercial product is a two-part system made from human plasma with more thrombin and fibrinogen (11),(12). The first component can find high fibrinogen concentrations, factor XIII, fibronectin, and other plasma proteins. Thrombin, calcium chloride, and an antifibrinolytic drug like aprotinin are all in the second component. It binds the mesh to the tissues by causing the activation of fibrinogen and thrombin by calcium chloride, creating and cross-linking fibrin, and developing polymerised fibrin chains, the final step of the coagulation cascade (13). The fibrinogen component provides tensile strength, thrombin stimulates the growth of fibroblasts, and aprotinin, an antifibrinolytic drug, lengthens the lifespan of the sealant. Due to its haemostatic and adhesive qualities, group A has recently been used in numerous surgical procedures. Promising preliminary findings have demonstrated that the strength of group A-based mesh fixation is atleast on par with that of staples. Even the integration of the mesh material was improved and accelerated by increased fibroblast activity (14).

There are relative risks and benefits to laparoscopic surgery for treating inguinal hernias, but not enough research has been done to determine which surgical repair method is superior (15). There is still disagreement over the ideal approach for inguinal hernia surgery because the results of such studies are inconsistent and have a significant impact on clinical practice (16),(17). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the advantages of fibrin glue versus absorbable tackers in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Material and Methods

This is a randomised clinical trail conducted at the Department of Surgery of a Tertiary Hospital of, SRM, Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India for 18 months, from March 2021 to August 2022. This study was carried out after receiving Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approval (2429/IEC/2021).

In the current study, total 54 patients participated for the laparoscopic hernia repair after obtaining the informed consent. Cases were randomly assigned into two groups using simple randomisation method, each with 27 participants-

• Group-A included patients who had laparoscopic TAPP hernia repairs using mesh-fixed group A, and
• Group-B included patients who had laparoscopic TAPP hernia repairs using mesh-fixed absorbable group B.

Inclusion criteria: Every patient with a unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia who was healthy enough for General Anaesthesia (GA) and aged 18-60 years were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with recurrence, complicated hernias (strangulated, incarcerated, or obstructed) and who were unfit for GA [Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), coronary insufficiency] were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Patients were evaluated using routine preoperative blood investigations, including complete blood count, coagulation profile, renal function tests, chest X-ray, urine routine, serology, and Electrocardiogram (ECG). Ultrasound (USG) abdomen was done for all patients to look for prostate size, and postvoidal residual urine. The preoperative evaluation also includes 2D echo and Pulmonary Function Tests (PFTs) in applicable patients. All patients were subjected to laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair with strict adherence to intraoperative surgical protocols and were operated by a single surgeon to reduce bias (Table/Fig 1).

The following factors were taken into account following surgery to compare group A and absorbable group B for laparoscopic hernia repair:

• Operating time;
• Postoperative pain were measured using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) based on a score of 0-10 for pain intensity, at 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, one week, four weeks and three months following surgery (18);
• Clinical examination was used to evaluate seromas and haematomas;
• Getting back to normal activities, such as walking, climbing stairs, bathing, and other things.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical significance of the data was assessed using the Chi-square and Unpaired t-test. In addition, Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25.0 was used to analyse controlled data. Participants in the study were monitored for atleast three months after the operation. A p-value <0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

In this study, fibrin glue and absorbable tackers were used in a similar number of patients across the different age groups, with no significant differences (p-value=0.696). In total, nine patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM), three patients with DM and Hypertension (HTN), and six patients with HTN were included in this study. The same was true for gender (11 males and 43 females), with no significant differences (p-value=0.735) in group A and group B between male and female patients. However, there were more patients who received fibrin glue and absorbable tackers on the right side (n=33) of the body than on the left side (n=21), but this difference was also not statistically significant (p-value=0.78) (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3).

The mean duration of surgery in group A was 71.00±3.18 minutes, while in the group B, it was 70.04±3.03 minutes. There was no significant difference in the duration of surgery between groups (p-value=0.125).

(Table/Fig 4) shows the mean and standard deviation of the pain scores at different time points after the surgery (24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 1 week, 4 weeks and 3 months). The mean pain scores were higher at earlier time points after the surgery, and decreased over time. For patients who received fibrin glue, the mean pain scores were higher at 24 hours and 48 hours compared to the scores for patients who received absorbable tackers. At four weeks after the surgery, the mean pain score for both groups was zero, indicating that the patients in both groups had no pain at that time (Table/Fig 4).

In both the groups, seroma was in 1 (3.7%) patient each with no significant difference in between groups (p-value=1.000). Group A was free of haematoma (100%) and in group B, it was present in 4 (14.8%) patients with absence of haematoma in remaining 23 (85.2%) patients. Two out of four patients with haematoma required aspiration with wide bore needle followed by compression dressing. Two patients were managed conservatively by serial USG monitoring (Table/Fig 5).

In group A, the return to normal activities in four weeks was present in 27 (100%) patients whereas, in group B, the return to normal activities in four weeks was in 22 (81.5%) patients. There was a significant difference in return to normal activities in four weeks between groups (p-value=0.019) (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

This study compared the short-term outcomes of using fibrin glue versus absorbable tackers for mesh fixation in laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair. Pain in the group A was significantly more at 24 hours and 48 hours. However, the return to normal activities was better in the group A after four weeks. TAPP, or transabdominal preperitoneal, is a laparoscopic surgical technique used to repair inguinal hernias.

In present study, there were 5 male and 22 female participants in the group A procedure, and in the group B, there were 6 male and 21 female participants with the insignificant difference between the two groups (p-value=0.735). Andresen K et al., also reported a likely disassociation between the fixation method and gender distribution in 2017. Concerning co-morbidities, both the absence and presence of co-morbidities like DM, DM with HTN and HTN did not influence the type of treatment received (19). Weltz AS et al., reported a similar but insignificant association with co-morbidities. They reported that the presence of DM and HTN among group A and group B patients was insignificant (p-value >0.05) (20). Gender and co-morbidities, such as DM and HTN, did not significantly affect the choice of mesh fixation procedure.

The side of the inguinal hernia also did not influence the fixation method. The position of the hernia did not influence the mesh fixation method. The right side of the body had a greater involvement in the current study’s group A (n=17) and group B (n=16) than the left side group A (n= 10) and group B (n=11), but this difference was also not statistically significant (p-value=0.78). This is also similar to the results of Hirsch H et al., (21). They reported that the fixation type was also not influenced by whether the hernia was direct or indirect. Yet, they reported patients (14%) with both direct and indirect hernias (21). Therefore, the type of hernia did not affect the type of mesh fixation.

The surgery duration for group A and group B did not differ. According to Karigoudar A et al., randomised prospective trial, using fibrin glue rather than prolene sutures for mesh fixation in Lichtenstein open inguinal hernia repair, reduced operating time, hospital stays and postoperative groin discomfort three months later (22). However, in a study by Weltz AS et al., mesh fixation by fibrin glue took less time to operate than tackers that were not statistically significant (20).

The mean pain scores increased immediately following the procedure and then gradually decreased. Patients who received group A had mean pain scores that were higher at 24 and 48 hours. However, the pain scores in the group A were significantly lower than the group B at 72 hours and 1 week (p-value<0.001). Same was proven by Nizam S et al., in their randomised controlled single blinded study (23).

Barchi LC et al., reported the occurrence of seroma (4.7%) in hernia fixed with mesh on the 9th postoperative day (24). No significant differences were found between the groups for secondary outcomes, except for a greater frequency of seroma development after glue fixation, according to Kaul A et al., (25). Meta-analysis conducted by Shi Z et al., found that the use of the glue fixation arm in laparoscopic repairs was associated with an increased risk of seroma development (26). The haematoma was also absent in those with fibrin glue, while four patients developed haematoma after fixation with tackers. The presence of haematoma varied among treatment groups with statistical significance.

The haematoma was also absent in those with group A, while four patients developed haematoma after fixation with group B. The presence of haematoma varied among treatment groups with statistical significance. According to a study conducted by Shi Z et al., there may be a small association between the use of hernia fixative mesh and group B and the development of seroma and haematoma. However, the association was considered to be insignificant (26). A 27 and 22 patients belonging to treatment groups fibrin glue and tackers returned to work in four weeks. Current work showed, in the group A, 27 people (100%) returned to their regular activities after four weeks. While in the group B, 22 (81.5%) people returned to their regular activities after four weeks. Return to regular activities in four weeks varied significantly between groups (p-value=0.019). However, the recovery duration after two week within the groups was statistically insignificant. Andersen K et al., reported no variations in recovery time with the fixative treatment received (19).

Limitation(s)

The limitation of present study is that it was a single-centered study with shorter follow-up period. Further research with larger and more diverse samples, as well as longer follow-up periods, is needed to fully understand the effectiveness of the intervention.

Conclusion

This study suggests that the use of fibrin glue for mesh fixation in TAPP may be a better option than tackers. Overall, the use of fibrin sealant for mesh fixation in TAPP surgery may offer several benefits compared to the use of tackers, including reduced postoperative pain, faster return to normal activities, and a lower incidence of complications such as haematomas. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine their clinical significance.

References

1.
Malik A, Bell CM, Stukel TA, Urbach DR. Recurrence of inguinal hernias repaired in a large hernia surgical speciality hospital and general hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Can J Surg. 2016;59(1):19-25. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Wani I. Double direct hernia, triple indirect hernia, double Pantaloon hernia (Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh hernia) with anomalous inferior epigastric artery: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;60:42-45. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Srivastava V, Jha PK, Verma AK, Ansari MA. Triple inguinal hernia: Rare clinical presentation. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13(11):e238619. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Bullen NL, Massey LH, Antoniou SA, Smart NJ, Fortelny RH. Open versus laparoscopic mesh repair of primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Hernia. 2019;23(3):461-72. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Rea R, Falco P, Izzo D, Leongito M, Amato B. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary transparietal closure of the hernial defect. BMC Surg. 2012;12(Suppl 1):S33. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Attri MR, Bhardwaj R, Qadir Kar W, Ahmad Z, Singh B. Mesh fixation using fibrin glue sealant in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP and TEP): A prospective randomised study. Jkscience.org. 2018;20(3):136-40.
7.
Nguyen MT, Berger RL, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Li LT, Kao LS, et al. Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surgery. 2014;149(5):415-21. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Liem MS, Van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y, van Vroonhoven TJ, Coala Trial Group. Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A randomised comparison. Annals of Surgery. 2003;237(1):136. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Schjøth-Iversen L, Refsum A, Brudvik KW. Factors associated with hernia recurrence after laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia: A 2-year prospective cohort study. Hernia. 2017;21(5):729-35. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Holt PJ, Praseedom RK. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Journal of British Surgery. 2010;97(1):04-11. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Odobasic A, Krdzalic G, Hodzic M, Hasukic S, Sehanovic A, Odobasic A. The role of fibrin glue polypropylene mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair. Medical Archives. 2014;68(2):90. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Lovisetto F, Zonta S, Rota E, Mazzilli M, Bardone M, Bottero L, et al. Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: A prospective, randomised study. Annals of Surgery. 2007;245(2):222. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Choi BJ, Jeong WJ, Lee SC. Fibrin glue versus staple mesh fixation in single-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A propensity score-matched analysis. International Journal of Surgery. 2018;53:32-37. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Ferrarese A, Marola S, Surace A, Borello A, Bindi M, Cumbo J, et al. Fibrin glue versus stapler fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal inguinal hernia repair: A single center 5-year experience and analysis of the results in the elderly. International Journal of Surgery. 2014;12 Suppl 2:S94-98. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Filipi CJ, Gaston-Johansson F, McBride PJ, Murayama K, Gerhardt J, Cornet DA, et al. An assessment of pain and return to normal activity. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair. Surg Endosc. 1996;10(10):983-86. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Arregui ME, Navarrete J, Davis CJ, Castro D, Nagan RF. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: Techniques and controversies. Surg Clin North Am. 1993;73(3):513-27. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Wellwood J, Sculpher MJ, Stoker D, Nicholls GJ, Geddes C, Whitehead A, et al. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: Outcome and cost. BMJ. 1998;317(7151):103-10. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Serlin RC, Mendoza TR, Nakamura Y, Edwards KR, Cleeland CS. When is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function. Pain. 1995;61(2):277-84. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Andresen K, Fenger AQ, Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Rosenberg J. Mesh fixation methods and chronic pain after transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia surgery: A comparison between fibrin sealant and tacks. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(10):4077-84. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Weltz AS, Sibia US, Zahiri HR, Schoeneborn A, Park A, Belyansky I. Operative outcomes after open abdominal wall reconstruction with retromuscular mesh fixation using fibrin glue versus transfascial sutures. Am Surg. 2017;83(9):937-42. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Hirsch H, Nagatomo K, Gefen J. Mesh fixation with fibrin sealant in totally extraperitoneal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(3):259-63. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Karigoudar A, Gupta AK, Mukharjee S, Gupta N, Durga CK. A prospective randomised study comparing fibrin glue versus Prolene suture for mesh fixation in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Indian J Surg. 2016;78(4):288-92. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Nizam S, Saxena N, Yelamanchi R, Sana S, Kardam D. Mesh fixation with fibrin glue versus tacker in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2021;91(10):2086-90. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Barchi LC, Franciss MY, Zilberstein B. Subcutaneous videosurgery for abdominal wall defects: A prospective observational study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019;29(4):523-30. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Kaul A, Hutfless S, Le H, Hamed SA, Tymitz K, Nguyen H, et al. Staple versus fibrin glue fixation in the laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(5):1269-78. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Shi Z, Fan X, Zhai S, Zhong X, Huang D. Fibrin glue versus staple for mesh fixation in the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(2):527-37.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61047.17904

Date of Submission: Oct 26, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 25, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 28, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 28, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 09, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 27, 2023 (15%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com