Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 69466

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : PC35 - PC40 Full Version

Do Arterial and Venous Diameter Predict the Success of Wrist Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula for Haemodialysis?: A Prospective Interventional Study


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60122.17803
Neeraj Kant Agrawal, Vijaykumar Huded, H Kiran Shankar, Saikat Majumdar, Shivendra Singh

1. Associate Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Shri B M Patil Medical College and Hospital, Vijayapur, Karnataka, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. 5. Professor, Department of Nephrology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Neeraj Kant Agrawal,
704, Rudra Samriddhi Apartments, Bhagwanpur, Varanasi-221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: agrawalnk@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: Native or autogenous Arteriovenous Fistula (AVFs) placed for Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is the gold standard. Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula (RCAVF) just proximal to the wrist is preferred, as it provides a larger proximal area for cannulation and can be created using End-to-Side (E-S) and Side-to-Side (S-S) techniques with good patency. Diameters of the radial artery and cephalic vein have been shown to produce predictable results in RCAVF. The distance between the radial artery and the cephalic vein at wrist or even more proximal has not been studied previously and may be instrumental in choosing either of the two surgical techniques for RCAVF.

Aim: To find the optimum diameters of radial artery and cephalic vein, evaluated by Colour Doppler Ultrasound (CDU) that predicted the success of wrist RCAVF in E-S and S-S RCAVF placement techniques for Haemodialysis (HD).

Materials and Methods: This prospective interventional study was carried out in the Departments of Plastic Surgery and Nephrology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India, from January 2019 to June 2021, to study 62 fistula in 52 patients of CKD in whom wrist RCAVF, as vascular access for HD, was constructed. The variables studied were calibre of radial artery and cephalic vein and their bearing on the surgical outcome in E-S and S-S surgical techniques. Further distance between radial artery and cephalic vein (in mm) at the wrist were meticulously studied to find its significance in both E-S and S-S surgical techniques. The outcomes measured were fistula usability (time from AVF placement to fistula maturation and subsequent functional use for HD) and AVF patency three months postoperatively. Significance of comparative variables was studied by two-tailed t-test.

Results: In the present study, average age was 46.86±14.85 years and 37 patients were males while 15 were females. Mean diameter of radial artery was 2.14±0.48 mm while it was 2.12±0.49 mm in E-S and 2.16±0.45 mm in S-S technique (p-value=0.309). Mean diameter of cephalic vein was 2.24±0.64 mm, 2.26±0.67 mm in E-S and 2.22±0.61 mm in S-S technique (p-value=0.734). The distance between the both artery and vein was 5.77±4.06 mm. Thirteen Radiocephalic Fistula (RCF) failed to mature (25%), 10 of these underwent secondary surgery for AVF. RCAVF became usable for HD after 7.70±1.12 weeks in E-S group and 7.59±1.19 weeks in S-S group (p-value=0.592). Primary AVF patency was 90.9% in E-S and 92.6% in S-S procedures at three months after surgery when the radial artery and cephalic vein were both larger than 2 mm. If the arteriovenous distance is less than 3 mm, the fistula can be treated using the S-S approach, and if it is greater than 3 mm, the E-S technique.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated association between cephalic vein and Radial Artery Diameter (RAD) (>2 mm) with good three months RCAVF patency. It was shown that the distance between the radial artery and cephalic vein at the wrist serves as a criterion for using either the S-S or E-S surgical procedures.

Keywords

Chronic kidney failure, Colour doppler ultrasound, Forearm, Radial artery, Vascular patency

The successful use of autogenous Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) among patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) on Haemodialysis (HD) has obviated the use of central venous catheters or arteriovenous grafts (1). The native or autogenous Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula (RCAVF) at the level of the wrist is the procedure of choice for vascular access (2). A surgically well created RCAVF allows flow at >500 mL/min (3). About 25% of the RCAVF fistulae fail to mature which not only delay the HD but also reduce the number of proximal sites at which another vascular access can be made [4,5]. Juxta-anastomotic stenosis that occurs in the outflow vein within 1-5 cm of the anastomosis has been implicated as the most common cause of AVF failure (6).

Wrist RCAVF has a unique advantage of enabling the use of entire forearm for cannula insertion in patients on HD. It also provides us with more options to create secondary fistula at more proximal sites. The fistula between the radial artery and cephalic vein just proximal to the wrist has been implicated as the procedure of choice and is created with both End to Side (E-S) and Side to Side (S-S) adaptations with good patency and reasonably low complication rates (7). There are a number of studies with extremely contradictory findings with no unanimous cut-off diameters for radial artery and cephalic vein that could predict primary failure or success (8),(9). However, there has been no research on the arteriovenous distance at the wrist for either of the two fistula placement techniques.

The study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that diameters of the radial artery and cephalic vein, evaluated by CDU, adequately predicted the success or failure of wrist Radiocephalic Fistula (RCF). The parameters were studied for E-S and S-S RCF placement techniques for HD. It was also determined whether arteriovenous distance had the potential to drive the choice of either of the two surgical techniques.

Material and Methods

A prospective interventional study was conducted in the Departments of Plastic Surgery and Nephrology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India, from January 2019 to June 2021. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee (Dean/2019/EC/1059) and informed consent was obtained from the study subjects.

A total of 62 fistulae were constructed in 52 patients of CKD who required RCF to provide vascular access for HD. They were enrolled by purposive sampling. The feasibility of placement of radiocephalic AVF just proximal to the wrist, preferably in the non dominant forearm, was decisive in selecting the samples. “Feasibility” refers to vascular, especially venous, characteristics resulting in a simple and easy fistula creation.

Inclusion criteria: Patients of all ages and both genders with CKD, patients with well palpable radial artery in the non dominant upper limb and patients with visible, palpable and compressible veins proximal to the wrist were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with prior fistula placement at or proximal to the radiocephalic zone in the proposed upper limb, venepuncture of the cephalic vein within three weeks, patients with Haemoglobin (Hb) <8 gm/dL owing to significantly high risk of primary AVF failure were excluded from the study. Patients with uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or hypertension despite medications, patients with atherosclerosis of vessels demonstrated by CDU, severely ill patients who were likely to be lost in follow-up and patients with evidence of ipsilateral arm trauma or surgery were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Anticoagulants, if any, were discontinued a week prior to surgery. Meticulous evaluation of the arterial system was performed by palpation of radial and ulnar peripheral pulses as well as Allen’s test in the proposed hand (10). The venous adequacy was clinically evaluated by refilling of the visible cephalic vein following distal to proximal emptying. The venous course was palpated for firmness secondary to phlebitis.

Preoperative CDU (EPIQ Elite, Royal Philips Electronic Inc, Amsterdam, Netherlands) of upper limb arteries and veins was performed in all patients to ascertain the calibre of vessels, distance between the radial artery and cephalic vein at wrist, depth from the skin surface and any atherosclerosis (Table/Fig 1).

Surgical details: Radial artery and cephalic vein were marked prior to surgery (Table/Fig 2) which was performed under local anaesthesia using 2% lignocaine without adrenaline and under magnification. A 4-5 cm longitudinal incision was given on the radial 36aspect of wrist starting from the styloid process of radius and going proximal. Cephalic vein was identified posterior to the styloid process and radial artery was identified anterior to it. They were mobilised adequately ligating the branches and tributaries predominantly found on the under surface of the vessels (Table/Fig 3). In the E-S technique of wrist RCAVF, the cephalic vein is divided and 6-7 mm long arteriotomy was used for E-S anastomosis (7),(11). Care taken to prevent venous end perpendicular to the artery, the preferred angle being 60° (Table/Fig 4). When the venous diameter was less and the cephalic vein was found 4-5 mm in the vicinity of the radial artery, S-S anastomosis was usually preferred. In this technique arteriotomy and venotomy of 8-10 mm was considered sufficient for a good flow. The cephalic vein distal to the anastomosis was ligated to prevent distal run off (Table/Fig 5) and divert arterial blood into the vein in the proximal direction only. Following removal of vascular clamps thrill was felt and bruit was heard and, thus, on table functioning of RCAVF was confirmed. Absence of bruit despite good venous filling and dilatation was indicated impending thrombosis and was managed by subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin. The patients were followed-up on postoperative days 1, 7 and 15 days with reference to thrill and/or bruit that directly indicated primary patency of fistula. Primary outcome assessed was the primary patency of the RCAVF with different diameters of cephalic vein and radial artery. Secondary outcome assessed was the usability of RCAVF for HD in both E-S and S-S groups. Primary patency was defined as the interval from the time of radiocephalic access placement until any intervention designed to maintain or re-establish patency, access thrombosis, or the time of measurement of patency.

The HD was performed (Nipro Surdial 55 plus, Osaka, Japan) using dialysate consisting of bicarbonate and concentrate in 4:3. A dialysate flow of 300 mL/min sustained for a minimum of three hours during HD was labelled as good flow. However, the “Rule of 6s” states that six weeks after the AV fistula has been placed, the fistula should be able to support a blood flow of 600 mL/min, be at a maximum of 6 mm from the surface and have a diameter greater than 6 mm (12).

Statistical Analysis

Mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values were used for the interpretation of the quantitative variables. However, extremes of minimum or maximum values affected the mean and range. Such variables were assessed by median and Interquartile Range (IQR). A 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) was calculated wherever applicable. The significance of comparative variables was subject to two-tailed t-test and p-value was calculated.

Results

Mean age of the 52 patients was 46.86±14.85 years (16-75 years) (Table/Fig 6). The ratio of the number of males to females was 37:15. Patients were found to be suffering from CKD for a median of 24 months. The average creatinine at the time of fistula placement was 5.55±1.16 mg/dL.

E-S fistula was constructed in 24 patients and S-S in 28 patients. The procedure of choice largely depended on the distance between radial artery and cephalic vein (Table/Fig 1).

Mean Hb at the time of fistula placement was 9.12±0.88 gm/dL (range 8-11 gm/dL). A total of 32 patients had Hb 8-9 gm/dL (61.54%) and 20 patients had Hb >9 gm/dL (95% CI, 8.8508 to 9.3292, t=0.703, p-value=0.964).

The lesser the distance the more inclined the surgeons were to perform S-S AVF. Average distance of all 52 patients was 5.77±4.06 mm (95% CI 107 to 8.035). The distance between radial artery and cephalic vein was 8.95 mm (4-16 mm) for E-S and 2.85 (1.4-5 mm) for S-S (Table/Fig 7).

The median venous diameter was 2.4 mm for the entire study sample (2.3 mm for E-S and 2.4 mm for S-S). Primary RCAVF patency ranged from 84.21% with a cephalic vein diameter of 2-2.4 mm to 91.66% with a cephalic vein diameter of 2.5 or greater. RAD was extensively studied and clearly found primary patency with diameter more than 2 mm in 94.87% of patients (37 of 39 patients) (Table/Fig 8).

The data collected was of 49 subjects as three of them were lost in follow-up. Thirteen RCF failed to mature (25%), out of these secondary procedures were performed in 10 patients within a median of five days after AVF using vessels of larger diameter. Time taken by fistula to mature and become usable was an important parameter to ascertain fistula success. The usability of AVF for HD in E-S group of patients was after 7.70±1.12 weeks while in S-S group after 7.59±1.19 weeks (p-value=0.592). The data suggested that three months primary patency of RCAVF including secondary procedures (proximal fistula at the elbow or the arm for failed RCAVF) was 90.9% in E-S and 92.6% in S-S techniques.

Discussion

International guidelines rigorously recommend AVF placement because its use is associated with lower mortality as well as avoids the risk of catheter-related complications [12,13]. It has been emphasised that the radiocephalic fistula is the vascular access of preference followed by more proximal fistula and synthetic graft (14). On the contrary, studies show that survival of RCF was poorer than BCF (15).

There are numerous studies that have analysed age as a covariate of access survival but have largely been inconclusive. In a retrospective review, Thant KZ et al., found that the average age of 246 patients whose AVF was usable six months after AVF placement was 58.3±12.4 years (range 18-87 years). Such a wide age range suggested that other factors besides age may also contribute to the success of AVF (16). Ocak G et al., also concluded that increased age, female sex and diabetes mellitus were associated with primary patency loss in patients with a fistula (17). Arhuidese IJ et al., in his study on HD patients found that diabetes mellitus was associated with a decrease in patient survival, access maturation, and primary fistula patency (18). In the present study, RCF failed in 13 patients (25%) and the average age in failures was 49.69 years (one patient more than 65 years), only four subjects were females and nine were diabetic. A combination of all three was not established in any of the patients. The results were in accordance with the study of Manne V et al., which showed that age, sex, diabetes, and type of construction (E-S or S-S) had no influence over fistula patency rates (19). As a matter of fact, hypertension was associated with more failures (11 out of 13 patients). Overall prevalence of hypertension in the present study was 84.61% which was in accordance with the study of Ku E et al., who described prevalence of 60-90% (20). In simple terms, it has been postulated that sustained hypertension constricted the blood vessels damaging and weakening them throughout the body including in the kidneys.

Monroy-Cuadros M et al., in their study suggest smoking as a strong risk factor for AVF failure, but authors could not attribute primary failure to smoking or alcohol in the present study (21). Abreu R et al., studied 117 patients and found the risk of primary AVF failure in patients with Hb <11 gm/dL (22). Although the average Hb was 9.12±0.88 gm/dL (range 8-11 gm/dL) in the current study, primary failure of RCAVF was observed in patients with Hb 8.78± 0.47 gm/dL (range 8-9.8 gm/dL).

The calibre of radial artery and cephalic vein has important bearing on AVF success, usability and long term survival. A thorough preoperative evaluation of the vessels of RCAVF was essential to predict its maturation (23). Most of the studies were aimed at direct assessment of venous diameter in determining fistula outcome (Table/Fig 9) [3,4,8,9,23-26]. Vein diameter was found to be an independent predictor of maturation (8). Kordzadeh A et al., came up with a novel measurement technique of Arteriovenous Ratio (AVR) index obtained from inflow RAD to that of outflow (cephalic vein diameter). They suggested that AVR index is an independent predictor of functional maturity in RCAVFs and AVR of 1-1.06 results in maturity (24). Wilmink T and Houlihan MC in their research, concluded that despite the venous diameter of 2 mm at the wrist being a good guide to proceed with RCAVF but AVF formation in smaller vessels was not automatically precluded (25). Kordzadeh A et al., exhaustively studied 324 patients of RCAVF and suugested that cephalic vein diameter >1.55 mm predicted primary functional maturity (9). Another study found failure of RCAVF in cephalic vein diameter <3 mm (26). Recent studies demonstrated successful functional maturation beyond cephalic vein diameter of 2 mm or 2.2 mm (23),(27).

Arterial diameters have limited value in predicting dialysis use in forearm fistula (25). The patency with regard to RAD was studied by Kordzadeh A et al., who found that the optimal range of radial artery for maturation and primary patency of RCAVF was atleast 2 mm and never below 1.5 mm (9). RCAVF maturation failure was found when RAD was <2.1 mm, while in recent study, assessment of RAD demonstrated successful maturation in >90% of patients with diameter more than 2 mm [26,27]. RAD was extensively studied in the present research and clearly found primary patency with diameter more than 2 mm in 94.87% of patients (37 of 39 patients). The findings underline the fact that successful outcome can be achieved by good surgical technique even with such smaller diameter radial artery and cephalic vein.

The depth of vessels from the skin surface was studied by a few researchers and cephalic vein was found to be at 6 mm or less from the surface (28). Various other parameters have been described in literature but the distance between radial artery and cephalic vein at the wrist have not been described. This distance might have the potential to decide upon the preferred surgical procedure. Authors, in their surgical practice found that with less distance it was more feasible to perform S-S AVF. This was preferred due to minimum mobilisation and ease of placement of RCAVF. Greater arterio-venous distance was not amenable to S-S AVF and therefore E-S AVF was the procedure of choice.

It is worth mentioning that future work can be directed towards comparison of native AVF with Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts. This would establish the superiority of either of the surgical technique. The sample size should also be higher to reach a definite conclusion.

Limitation(s)

This is a single-centred cohort and, therefore, demography of only one region has been studied. It also lacks comparison with other more proximal sites of placement of AVF. Multicentric study could give regional variations and help us to evaluate the surgical techniques and related results better.

Conclusion

Primary patency and usability of RCAVF was good when either E-S or S-S techniques were performed. Radial artery and cephalic vein diameter more than 2 mm is recommended to have good primary patency of RCAVF. Arteriovenous distance was crucial in RCAVF, using the S-S approach if it was less than 3 mm and the E-S technique if it was greater than 3 mm.

References

1.
Bénard V, Pichette M, Lafrance JP, Elftouh N, Pichette V, Laurin LP, et al. Impact of Arteriovenous fistula creation on estimated glomerular filtration rate decline in Predialysis patients. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):420. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Schmidli J, Widmer MK, Basile C, de Donato G, Gallieni M, Gibbons CP, et al. Editor’s Choice- Vascular access: 2018 clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55(6):757-818. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Sadasivan K, Kunjuraman U, Murali B, Yadev I, Kochunarayanan A. Factors affecting the patency of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas based on clinico-radiological parameters. Cureus. 2021;13(3):e13678. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Voorzaat BM, van der Bogt KEA, Janmaat CJ, van Schaik J, Dekker FW, Rotmans JI, et al. Arteriovenous fistula maturation failure in a large cohort of hemodialysis patients in the Netherlands. World J Surg. 2018;42(6):1895-903. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Schinstock CA, Albright RC, Williams AW, Dillon JJ, Bergstralh EJ, Jenson BM, et al. Outcomes of arteriovenous fistula creation after the fistula first initiative. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(8):1996-2002. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Pirozzi N, Mancianti N, Scrivano J, Fazzari L, Pirozzi R, Tozzi M. Monitoring the patient following radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula creation: Current perspectives. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2021;17:111-21. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Mozaffar M, Fallah M, Lotfollahzadeh S, Sobhiyeh MR, Gholizadeh B, Jabbehdari S, et al. Comparison of efficacy of side to side versus end to side arteriovenous fistulae formation in chronic renal failure as a permanent hemodialysis access. Nephrourol Mon. 2013;5(3):827-30. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Bashar K, Clarke-Moloney M, Burke PE, Kavanagh EG, Walsh SR. The role of venous diameter in predicting arteriovenous fistula maturation: When not to expect an AVF to mature according to pre-operative vein diameter measurements? A best evidence topic. Int J Surg. 2015;15:95-99. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Kordzadeh A, Askari A, Hoff M, Smith V, Panayiotopoulos Y. The impact of patient demographics, anatomy, comorbidities, and peri-operative planning on the primary functional maturation of autogenous radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53(5):726-32. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Agarwal T, Agarwal V, Agarwal P, Thakur S, Bobba R, Sharma D. Assessment of collateral hand circulation by modified Allen’s test in normal Indian subjects. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(4):626-29. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
ElKassaby M, Elsayed N, Mosaad A, Soliman M. End-to-side versus side-to-side anastomosis with distal vein ligation for arteriovenous fistula creation. Vascular. 2021;29(5):790-96.[crossref][PubMed]
12.
Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, Shenoy S, Yevzlin AS, Abreo K, et al. National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(4 Suppl 2):S1-S164. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Oliver MJ. The science of fistula maturation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(11):2607-09. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Lee T. Fistula first initiative: Historical impact on vascular access practice patterns and influence on future vascular access care. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2017;8(3):244-54. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Gaur P, Srivastava A, Sureka SK, Kapoor R, Ansari MS, Singh UP. Outcomes of primary arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis in elderly patients (>65 years) with end stage renal disease: A study on indian population. Indian J Nephrol. 2019;29(6):387-92. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Thant KZ, Quah K, Ng TK, Ho P. Retrospective review of arteriovenous fistula success rate in a multi-ethnic Asian population. J Vasc Access. 2016;17(2):131-37. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Ocak G, Rotmans JI, Vossen CY, Rosendaal FR, Krediet RT, Boeschoten EW, et al. Type of arteriovenous vascular access and association with patency and mortality. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14:79. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Arhuidese IJ, Purohit A, Elemuo C, Parkerson GR, Shames ML, Malas MB. Outcomes of autogenous fistulas and prosthetic grafts for hemodialysis access in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(6):2088-96. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Manne V, Vaddi SP, Reddy VB, Dayapule S. Factors influencing patency of Brescia-Cimino arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2017;28(2):313-17. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Ku E, Lee BJ, Wei J, Weir MR. Hypertension in CKD: Core Curriculum 2019. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;74(1):120-31. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Monroy-Cuadros M, Yilmaz S, Salazar-Bañuelos A, Doig C. Risk factors associated with patency loss of hemodialysis vascular access within 6 months. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(10):1787-92. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Abreu R, Rioja S, Vallespin J, Vinuesa X, Iglesias R, Ibeas J. Predictors of early failure and secondary patency in native arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Int Angiol. 2018;37(4):310-14. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Bhuwania S, Goel R, Bansal R, Saxena S. Prospective evaluation of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula to determine the causes for non maturity with clinical and ultrasonography doppler. Indian J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;8:S147-52. [crossref]
24.
Kordzadeh A, Askari A, Panayiotopoulos Y. Independent association of arteriovenous ratio index on the primary functional maturation of autologous radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(6):1821-28. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Wilmink T, Houlihan MC. Diameter criteria have limited value for prediction of functional dialysis use of arteriovenous fistulas. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;56(4):572-81. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Misskey J, Hamidizadeh R, Faulds J, Chen J, Gagnon J, Hsiang Y. Influence of artery and vein diameters on autogenous arteriovenous access patency. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(1):158-72. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Srivastava A, Sureka SK, Prabhakaran S, Lal H, Ansari MS, Kapoor R. Role of preoperative duplex ultrasonography to predict functional maturation of wrist radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula: A study on Indian population. Indian J Nephrol. 2018;28(1):10-14. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Teodorescu V, Gustavson S, Schanzer H. Duplex ultrasound evaluation of hemodialysis access: A detailed protocol. Int J Nephrol. 2012;2012:508956.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60122.17803

Date of Submission: Sep 07, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 17, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 10, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 16, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 08, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jan 07, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com