Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 244467

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : PC05 - PC08 Full Version

Characteristics of Neuropathic, Ischaemic and Neuroischaemic Diabetic Foot Ulcers- A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62070.17645
Chabungbam Gyan Singh, Abhik Sil, Debopam Sanyal, Arup Mandal

1. Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Surgery, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Surgery, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India. 4. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Surgery, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India.

Correspondence Address :
Debopam Sanyal,
Senior Resident, Department of Surgery, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India.
E-mail: debopamsanyal1@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU) can be divided into neuropathic, ischaemic and neuroischaemic types. Since the pathophysiology is different, it is important to ascertain the outcome data on the three subgroups of DFU.

Aim: To compare and assess the differences in the characteristics and healing process of the three types (Neuropathic, Ischaemic, and Neuroischaemic) of DFU.

Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted from April 2019 to July 2021 in the Department of Surgery, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS) Hospital, Imphal, Manipur, India. Age, gender, duration of diabetes mellitus, smoking, hypertension, Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c), aetiology of DFU, osteomyelitis, gangrene, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), and presence of multiple ulcer were recorded. Healing time and outcome (healed, non healed and amputation) of ulcer were the dependent variable. Data collected were analysed using SPSS-version-21. Fisher’s-exact test was used for proportions. Analysis of the time needed for healing was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. A p-value of <0.05 was taken as significant.

Results: A total of 42 patients were recruited for the study and 29 (69%) were males. Patients in neuropathic, ischaemic and neuroischaemic DFUs were 18,14 and 10, respectively. Hypertension (100%) and smoking history (100%) were present in the ischaemic group. Maximum healing (88.9%) was seen in patient with neuropathic ulcers and maximum non healing (28.6%) and amputation (21.4%) occurred in ischaemic group. Mean (SD) heal time in days were 165.5 (4.62), 141.1 (9.17) and 86.4 (8.02) for ischaemic, neuroischaemic and neuropathic, respectively (p<0.001). The average time in which 50% of patients (median) had healed wounds was 75, 136, and 171 days for neuropathic, ischaemic, and neuroischaemic ulcers, respectively.

Conclusion: Neuropathic DFU has better healing than the other DFUs. Ischaemic DFU have maximum non heal ulcers and amputation.

Keywords

Aetiology, Diabetes mellitus, Duration, Kaplan-meier method

Diabetes mellitus refers to a group of common metabolic disorders that share the phenotype of hyperglycaemia. Depending on the aetiology, the factors contributing to hyperglycaemia include reduced insulin secretion, decreased glucose utilisation, and increased glucose production (1). According to WHO, an estimated 422 million adults were living with diabetes in 2014. The prevalence of diabetes nearly doubled since 1980, rising from 4.7%-8.5% in the adult population in 2014 (2). In India, there were 77 million cases of diabetes according to IDF in 2019 (3).

The DFU is a foot affected by ulceration that can be associated with neuropathy and/or Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) of the lower limb (4). The prevalence of DFU among diabetic patients is reported to be between 4%-10% with an estimated lifetime incidence of almost 25% (5). DFU puts a huge financial burden on the patient and healthcare services. Amputation of the lower limb is 10-20 times more common in diabetic patients and it is estimated that every 30 seconds, a lower limb or a part of the lower limb is lost somewhere in the world as a consequence of diabetes (6).

The DFUs can be divided into neuropathic, ischaemic and neuroischaemic types. Neuropathic DFU form as a result of loss of peripheral sensations. Damage to the motor and sensory nerves leads to muscle wasting and eventually foot deformities. This then provides additional pressure points which are prone to ulceration. The wound margins are undermined and the surrounding skin is calloused. Foot temperature is warm and foot pulses palpable. Ulcers are typically painless (7). On the other hand, ischaemic ulcers develop due to PAD, which typically involves tibial and peroneal arteries but spares the dorsalis pedis artery. These ulcers occur spontaneously and are associated with pain. It occurs at the edges of the foot, toes, and heels, and they often present with gangrene. Their foot temperature is cold and their pulses are palpable. Neuroischaemic ulcers appear the same as ischaemic ulceration but they are painless due to neuropathy (8).

Foot ulceration requires long and intensive treatment and has important effects on quality of life of patient and is associated with major healthcare costs (9). Although recently much effort is made to develop international guidelines in order to deliver uniform and structured care, prospective data on outcomes in patients with DFU is limited in the northeast part of India. Moreover, the population of diabetic patients who present with foot ulceration is heterogeneous. Although, most patients have peripheral neuropathy, there are several other characteristics that may vary among patients, such as the presence of peripheral artery disease, infection, and comorbidities. So it is important to ascertain the outcome data on the three subgroups of DFU (10).

Hence, the present study was designed to compare and assess the differences in the characteristics and healing process of these three types of DFU namely neuropathic, ischaemic, and neuroischaemic. This study information may be helpful for the health planners and clinicians of this state and our country for effective and better clinical decision-making in both the prevention and management of DFUs.

Material and Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted from April, 2019 to July, 2021 in Manipur at the Department of Surgery, RIMS. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional Research Ethics Board before the commencement of the study {No.A/206/REB-Comm(SP)/RIMS/2015/615/2019}.

Inclusion criteria: All the patients of both sexes aged 35 years and above who were diagnosed as DFU during the study period were included.

Exclusion criteria: Those who refused to participate, those with severe hepatic dysfunction, and those with auto-immune disease and malignancy were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

After the patient and their relatives were explained about the study and those who were willing and giving valid informed written consent, were enrolled for the study. The patient’s socio-demographic data and relevant clinical history was recorded in preformed proforma and thorough clinical examination was carried out. All the patients were divided into three groups-ischaemic, neuroischaemic and neuropathic type of DFU. Laboratory investigations like lipid profile, blood sugar test, HbA1c, kidney function test were done. The healing time of the three types of DFUs were compared.

All patients were given standard ulcer wound care including the use of appropriate footwear, non weight-bearing limb support, debridement of slough and dead tissue, and daily monitoring of the ulcer. When there were clinical signs of soft tissue infection, appropriate antibiotics according to the predominant bacterial flora in the gram staining were given i.e., quinolones, aminopenicillins, first or second-generation cephalosporins. All patients were given insulin therapy with the goal to keep fasting serum glucose levels below 6 mmol/L. Patients were followed-up to six months. At the end of the observation period, the results were analysed.

Operational definition

1. DFU with only features of PAD was considered as ischaemic ulcer. PAD was defined as ankle brachial index <0.9 (11).
2. DFU with only features of peripheral neuropathy was considered as neuropathic ulcer. Peripheral neuropathy was defined as more than one insensate areas of the three sites (plantar aspect of hallux, metatarsophalangeal joint 1 and 5) tested per foot based on the Semmes Weinstein 10-g monofilament. Presence of paraesthesia, tingling, numbness, absence of Achilles tendon reflex, loss of vibration sensation (by 128 Hz tuning fork) was taken into account [10-12].
3. DFU with features of both PAD and peripheral neuropathy were considered as neuroischaemic.

Study variables: Socio-demographic characteristics like age, sex, other variables like duration of diabetes mellitus, smoking history, HbA1c, hypertension, gangrene, osteomyelitis, eGFR, presence of multiple ulcer, healing time, outcome of the ulcers were recorded.

Statistical Analysis

The collected data were entered and analysed in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (IBM) version 21. Summarisation of data was carried out by using descriptive statistics such as mean, median, standard deviation and percentages. Fisher’s-exact test were used for categorical variables. Analysis for time needed for healing was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method (13). Healing time of the three DFU types were compared using the log rank test. The p-value <0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results

Out of a total of 72 patients with DFU only 42 patients were recruited in the study and others were excluded by exclusion criteria. Out of 42 patients, 29 patients were male, distributed among neuropathic, ischaemic and neuroischaemic as 12,10 and 7, respectively. The mean age (in years) of the patients among neuropathic, ischaemic and neuroischaemic were 45.44±8.94, 59.29±8.77, and 57.2±7.98, respectively as shown in (Table/Fig 1).

Out of 42 patients, maximum patients were having neuropathic ulcer (42.9%) followed by ischaemic ulcers (33.3%) and neuroischaemic ulcers (23.8%).

Patient with HbA1c value more than 6.5 is well-distributed among the three groups with ischaemic group having the highest (92.9%). Similarly, lowest eGFR values were observed in the ischaemic group (42.74±4.31) as shown in (Table/Fig 2).

As shown in (Table/Fig 3), gangrene appeared more prevalent in ischaemic (50%) and neuroischaemic (50%) group than patients in neuropathic (11.1%) group of patients.

As shown in (Table/Fig 4), healing occurred more in patient with neuropathic ulcers (88.9%) than in patient with ischaemic ulcers (50%) and neuroischaemic ulcers (70%) but it was not statistically significant.

The Kaplan Meier function analysis was performed to estimate mean healing time accounting no-healing as right censored in different type of ulcer, it is estimated the mean heal time in days for ischaemic was 165.5 (Median=171), followed by neuroischaemic 141.1 (Median=136), and neuropathic 86.4 (Median=75) with significant p<0.001 by log rank test (Table/Fig 5). (Table/Fig 6) presents the time in days until the patient achieve healing according to ulcer type. The average time in which 50% of patients (median) had healed wounds was 75, 136, and 171 days for neuropathic, ischaemic, and neuroischaemic ulcers, respectively. (Table/Fig 7) shows the picture of a neuropathic ulcer. [Table/Fig-8,9] shows clinical pictures of ischaemic and neuroischaemic ulcers respectively, which were followed-up till six months of duration.

Discussion

To predict and manage DFUs, it is essential to assess the presence of risk factors and the severity of peripheral neuropathy and PAD. In this study using the etiological classification system, patients with neuropathic ulcers tended to develop DFUs at a younger age, than those with ischaemic ulcers. Similar finding has been noted in a study by Yotsu RR et al., where neuropathic ulcers were seen in younger DFU patients than those of ischaemic and neuroischaemic (4). This is further supported in a study by Miyata T et al., where the mean age of patients in neuropathic ulcers group is less than 7those of other groups (14). Here, 69% of the patients are males in this study, further in all three groups males are seen to be more in proportion than females, which is supported by other studies Yotsu RR et al., and Miyata T et al., (4),(14). Monteiro-Soares M et al., identified an increased risk of DFU for the male gender (15).

The HbA1C value >6.5 was seen in 92% of the patient in ischaemic group. But in a study by Yotsu RR et al., HbA1c value level was seen highest among the neuropathic DFU group. Gangrene was seen more in ischaemic (50%) and neuroischaemic (50%) group (5). Multiple ulcers were also seen maximum in ischaemic groups in this study. Similar findings have been shown by Yotsu RR et al., in their study with maximum multiple ulcers in 50% ischaemic group and gangrene were reported in 42.9% neuroischaemic, 40% ischaemic group and 18% neuropathic group (4). Gershater MA et al., in their study also showed the association between multiple ulcers and ischaemic and neuroischaemic foot ulcers (16). In this study duration of having diabetes was seen more in the neuroischaemic group followed by ischaemic group, but in a study by Yotsu RR et al., ischaemic (24.2±14.1 years) had the maximum duration of diabetes followed by neuroischaemic (18.2±7.2 years), similarly in another study by Miyata T et al., maximum duration of diabetes was seen in patient with neuroischaemic group (17.42 years) (4),(14). Thus, DFU occurs more frequently among the neuropathic group with a shorter duration of diabetes but it needs further evaluation with the duration of controlled or uncontrolled DM.

Hypertension (100%) and smoking history (100%) were very prevalent among the ischaemic group in this study. Smoking may be a predecessor for hypertension also. Other study also indicated to have more patients with smoking history in ischaemic DFU group (14). But in another study the patients with smoking history were more common in the neuroischaemic followed by ischaemic group (4). Sonnaville JJ et al., and Guerrero-Romero F et al., in their study had found that there is a significant relationship between cigarette smoking and DFU which can be attributed to the formation of plaques in blood vessels by cigarette smoking (17),(18).

In this study, the lowest eGFR values were noted in the ischaemic group (42.74±4.31 mL/min/1.73 m2). This compares favourably with the results from the study conducted by Yotsu RR et al., they also found the lowest eGFR among the ischaemic group with 40.5±27 mL/min/1.73 m2 (4). Baber U et al., in a study reported that the co-existence of microalbuminuria and reduced eGFR was associated with a high prevalence of PAD and hence ischaemic DFU (19).

The average time in which 50% of patients (median) had healed wounds was 75,136, and 171 days for neuropathic, ischaemic, and neuroischaemic ulcers, respectively. Yotsu RR et al., in their study also compared the healing time of three ulcer types and they found that the average healing time in which 50% of patients had healed wounds was 70,113, and 233 days for neuropathic, ischaemic, and neuroischaemic ulcers, respectively which was similar trend as in this study (4). Further studies can be done taking into account the duration of controlled or uncontrolled DM and inclusion of larger study population covering multicenter hospitals to confirm our findings.

Limitation(s)

As the sample size was small, the present findings of this study cannot be generalised to the general population.

Conclusion

The DFU has strong association with smoking history, thus strict abstinence from smoking among newly diagnosed DM patient may reduce DFU. Ischaemic type of DFU is associated with low eGFR pointing to underlying kidney disease. Therefore, ischaemic type of DFU need through work-up and monitoring for renal dysfunction so as to prevent end-stage renal disease. Ischaemic DFU is also associated with a higher prevalence of multiple ulcers and gangrene leading to higher incidence of amputation. A robust public health program on DFU may help in reducing amputation in DFU through early detection and appropriate foot care.

References

1.
Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, Fauci AS, Longo DL, Loscalzo J, editors. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 19th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2015.
2.
World Health Organization. Global Report on Diabetes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
3.
International diabetes federation. IDF SEA members. Available at: https://www. idf.org/our-network/regions-members/south-east-asia/members/94-india.html. [Accessed on 21st December 2021].
4.
Yotsu RR, Pham NM, Oe M, Nagase T, Sananda H, Hara H, et al. Comparison of characteristics and healing course of diabetic foot ulcers by etiological classification: Neuropathic, ischemic and neuroischemic type. J Diabetes Complications. 2014;28(4):528-35. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Syafril S. Pathophysiology diabetic foot ulcer. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science. 2018;125(1):012161. [crossref]
6.
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 8 th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2017. Available at: https://diabetesatlas.org/ upload/resources/previous/files/8/IDF_DA_8e-EN-final.pdf.
7.
Boulton AJ, Kirsner RS, Vileikyte L. Neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;351(1):48-55. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Armstrong DG, Lavery LA. Diabetic foot ulcers: Prevention, diagnosis and classification. Am Fam Physician. 1998;57(6):1325-32.
9.
Zimny S, Schatz H, Pfohl M. Determinants and estimation of healing times in diabetic foot ulcers. J Diabetes Complications. 2002;16(5):327-32. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Pompers L, Schaper N, Apelqvist J, Edmonds M, Jual E, Mauricio D, et al. Prediction of outcome of individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: Focus on difference between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIAL study. Diabetologia. 2001;51(5):745-55. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Gregg EW, Sorlie P, Paulos-Ram, Gu Q, Eberhardt MS, Wolz M, et al. Prevalence of lower extremity disease in the U.S. adult population ≥40 years with and without diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(7):1591-97. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Oyer DS, Saxon D, Shah A. Quantitative assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with use of the clanging tuning fork test. Endocr Pract. 2007;13(1):05-10. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Survival probabilities (the Kaplan-Meier method). BMJ. 1998;317(7172):1572-80. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Miyata T, Yamada N, Miyachi Y. Efficacy by ulcer type and safety of lipo-PGE1 for Japanese patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis. 2010;17(8):805-16. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Monteiro-Soares M, Boyko EJ, Ribeiro J, Ribeiro I, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Predictive factors for diabetic foot ulceration: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012;28(7):574-600. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Gershater MA, Löndahl M, Nyberg P, Larsson J, Thörne J, Eneroth M, et al. Complexity of factors related to outcome of neuropathic and neuroischemic/ ischemic diabetic foot ulcers: A cohort study. Diabetologia. 2009;52(3):398-407. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
de Sonnaville JJ, Colly LP, Wijkel D, Heine RJ. The prevalence and determinants of foot ulceration in type II diabetic patients in a primary health care setting. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1997;35(2-3):149-56. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Guerrero-Romero F, Rodríguez-Morán M. Relationship of microalbuminuria with the diabetic foot ulcers in type II diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 1998;12(4):193-96. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Baber U, Mann D, Shimbo D, Woodward M, Olin JW, Muntner P. Combined role of reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate and microalbuminuria on the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104(10):1446-51.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62070.17645

Date of Submission: Dec 06, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 27, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Mar 03, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 07, 2022
• Manual Googling: Feb 22, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 01, 2023 (15%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com