Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 28905

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : NC08 - NC11 Full Version

Mask Associated Dry Eye (MADE) in Healthcare Workers: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/58092.17902
Sudeshna Roy, Kesha Shah, Shafaque Sahar, Sunandan Modak

1. Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 4. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Kesha Shah,
1, Bakul Bagan Row, Riddhi Siddhi Jyoti, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: jagrutibakul@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic mediated by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), made the use of face masks mandatory to check the spread of the disease. With the increased use of face masks, more people started presenting to the ophthalmologist with symptoms of dry eye. The proposed mechanism of dry eye was attributed to air blowing upwards from behind the mask into the eyes, especially in loose fitting masks. This air leads to rapid evaporation of tears and disturbance of homeostasis of the tear film.

Aim: To measure self-reported symptoms of dry eye and to establish mask use as a risk factor for the development of Dry Eye Disease (DED) in healthcare workers in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted at Nilratan Sircar (NRS) Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, for a duration of three months from December 2021 to February 2022. The study was conducted on 146 participants. An online survey was conducted using Google Forms, sent via email to hospital employees working in different departments of the hospital. All healthcare workers employed at NRS Medical College and Hospital who wore a face mask during duty hours and were willing to participate in the study were included. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used and modified by adding “while wearing a facemask” to the end of each question. To establish face mask use as a causative agent for development of DED, a few other questions related to face mask usage were included in the survey. The data was tabulated in Microsoft excel and analysed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.

Results: The mean age of the study population was 27.4±8.28 years. The mean hours of wearing a mask was 6.38±3.04 hours. N95 face mask was the most common type of mask used. The study population included 100 doctors, 14 nursing staff, 18 optometrists, eight group D staff (sweepers and ward attendants), and six dieticians. The mean OSDI score was 14.24. Increased usage of face masks, in particular surgical, more hours of reading significantly correlated with higher incidence of DED.

Conclusion: This study showed that increased hours of face mask use in particular surgical was associated with development of DED. To encourage more people to wear face masks, all possible problems arising from face mask use should be promptly identified and dealt with.

Keywords

Coronavirus disease-19, Dry eye disease, Ocular surface disease index

Dry eye is a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface characterised by tear film hyperosmolarity, ocular surface inflammation and tear film instability resulting in a loss of homeostasis of the tear film (1). DED spectrum can range from minor discomfort to rarely sight-threatening complications. Discomfort is seen more in pre-existing DED, while more visual symptoms are seen in new-onset DED (2). The prevalence of DED in various American and Australian studies ranges from 5%-16%, whereas Asian studies show a higher prevalence of approximately 27%-33% (3),(4),(5),(6).

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has compelled everyone to use face masks to prevent further spread of the disease. In June 2020, DE White, an American ophthalmologist, mentioned in his blog about the increasing number of DED patients in his clinic and called it Mask Associated Dry Eye (MADE) (2). The possible aetiology is the increased evaporation of the tear film as the exhaled air is forced up and out of the top of the mask, especially if the mask is not snugly fit against the face. This evaporation over a period of time, results in a thinner and less stable tear film. Punctate ocular surface staining may be seen clinically. People who wear masks for prolonged periods reports irritated, uncomfortable, red, dry-feeling eyes (7). Irritation of the eye via similar mechanisms has been described. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) therapy increased tear evaporation and thus ocular irritation in patients with sleep apnoea (8). The first study to describe the prevalence of MADE analysed a total of 3,605 responses in an online survey. A total of 2,447 people reported having symptoms, of which 658 (26.9%) participants reported their symptoms exaggerated while wearing a mask. An 18.3% of all participants experienced MADE (9). A prospective cohort study also identified MADE and the risk factors associated with it. Female gender subjects with a history of prior DED, and wearing a face mask longer than three hours per day were the main associated factors (10).

This study aims to find the association between facemask use and development of DED in healthcare workers of a Tertiary Care Hospital, since this subgroup uses facemask for longer hours.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted at NRS Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, from December 2021 to February 2022. An anonymous online survey was distributed using Google Forms to hospital employees working in different departments. The Institution Ethics Committee of the centre approved the study. (Letter No-NRSMC/IEC/201/2022).

Sample size calculation: It was done in G*Power 3.1.9.2 software and considering 5% alpha error with 80% power of the study, the sample size was calculated as 140.146.

Inclusion criteria: All healthcare workers employed at NRS Medical College and Hospital who wore face masks during duty hours and were willing to participate in the study were included.

Exclusion criteria: All healthcare workers with history of ocular surgery or trauma, any Vitamin A deficiency, nasolacrimal duct obstruction, lid retraction and 7th cranial nerve palsy were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

A patient consent form was present at the beginning of each questionnaire. The online survey consisted of clinico-demographic factors, department where the person was currently working, and designation of the person. The OSDI Questionnaire (11) was used with some modifications. The questionnaire included 12 questions, consisting of three groups-ocular symptoms, vision-related functions and environmental triggers (Table/Fig 1). The responses are graded on a scale from 0 to 4: 0-none of the time:

• 1-some of the time;
• 2-half of the time;
• 3-most of the time;
• 4-all of the time.

The total score was calculated on the basis of the following formula: OSDI={(sum of scores for all questions answered)×100}/{(total number of questions answered)×4}. Original OSDI questionnaire was modified by adding “while wearing a facemask” at the end of each question (e.g., Have you experienced eyes that are sensitive to light during the last week while wearing a facemask). The OSDI questionnaire has high internal consistency and an excellent validity. In a large sample of patients with DED and normal controls, good to excellent test-retest reliability was seen (12). In the OSDI questionnaire, the following questions were included as they can be potential risk factors for the development of DED (9),(10),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17):

Average hours of face mask use

• Type of mask most commonly used
• History of DED. If there was a previous history of DED, the severity was graded based on the original OSDI questionnaire. The patients had to answer the questionnaire based on their symptoms prior to the use of face masks. A score of 0-12 was taken as normal, 13-22 was considered as Mild disease, 23-32 as moderate disease and 33-100 as severe disease (18).
• Awareness of air blowing upward during mask use;
• Any history of contact lens use and duration of such use;
• Average hours of use of electronic devices like computer, mobile phones, TV, etc.,
• Average hours of reading;
• Whether the subject has reached menopause;
• Use of Oral Contraceptive Pills (OCPs);
• Use of eye drops like antiglaucoma drugs, lubricants, etc.

Statistical Analysis

The Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient was calculated to find out the correlation between hours of mask use and the OSDI score and also found out the type of face mask use that is most likely to cause DED. The data was tabulated in Microsoft excel and analysed with SPSS V.24 software. Pearson’s correlation, independent t-test and one-way 9Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were used in the statistical analysis. The p-value ≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

The study included 146 participants, with a mean age of 27.4±8.28 years, among which 78.08% (114) were women. There were 100 doctors, 14 nursing staff, 18 optometrists, 8 group D staff (sweepers and ward attendants), and 6 dieticians. Hundred doctors, 14 nursing staff, 18 optometrists, 8 group D staff (sweepers and ward attendants), and 6 dieticians. 41.78% (N=61) of people reported having symptoms of dry eye during mask use. A 46% had mild disease, while 37.7% and 16.4% had moderate and severe disease, respectively. (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3) shows the demographic data obtained from the study.

The mean OSDI score for the whole study population was 33.13±12.79. (Table/Fig 4) shows mean OSDI score according to people working in different departments, gender, hours of mask usage, people having awareness of air blowing upward during mask use and previous history of DED. The highest mean OSDI score was recorded for subjects who were working in the Paediatric Medicine Department which was 28.20 and the lowest mean OSDI score was noted in the ENT Department which was 4.41. The mean OSDI score was 14.24. The average duration of contact lens use was 4±0.02 hours.

(Table/Fig 5) depicts the Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient and p-value calculated to find out the correlation of age, hours of face mask use, hours of electronic device use and hours of reading with the OSDI score.

Discussion

This study was done to evaluate the relationship between face mask use and MADE prevalence. In this study, 41.78% of people reported having symptoms of dry eye during mask use. In a survey of 3,605 people on mask associated dry eye, the prevalence of MADE was 18.3% (9). However, in a study by Dag U et al., 70% prevalence of self-reported mask associated dry eye was seen among healthcare workers. The prolonged use of face masks associated with longer working hours in healthcare workers may be responsible for the higher prevalence of MADE in this population (19).

In this study, women had a higher mean OSDI score (15.86) compared to men (11.64). This result was consistent with previous findings of higher prevalence of DED in women compared to men (20). Increasing age was not positively correlated with the OSDI score in this sample. This finding is similar to a study which investigated the self-reported symptoms of mask associated dry eye in a sample of 3605 people (9). This observation could be justified by the fact that older people wear masks for fewer hours than workers. Moreover, in comparison to dry eye MADE is a temporary condition due to a local environmental change. Temperature and humidity of the air inside the mask is higher than that of ambient air. More hours of face mask use was found to be associated with a higher OSDI score suggesting that face mask use is a significant risk factor for the development of DED. Giannaccare G et al., in their study discussed how the use of face masks could contribute to the onset or increase in DED symptoms. An incorrectly fitted mask or displacement of the mask could cause air to leak around the eyes and cause a rapid evaporation of tears (21). CPAP users report similar effects but to a lesser extent (22).

In this study, cloth and surgical mask hours use was positively correlated with the OSDI score while N95 mask hours use was negatively correlated. This may be attributed to the fact that cloth or surgical masks are loose fitting and hence a steady inflow and outflow of air occurs around the eyes from different areas around the mask edges. This exhaled air is further trapped if spectacles are worn. This is further supported by the fact that subjects who had an awareness of air blowing upward during mask use had a significantly greater mean OSDI score compared with subjects who had no awareness of air blowing upward during mask use. N95 masks are better fitted to the face with reduced gaps between the mask and skin and hence, a negative correlation was found between N95 mask hours use and OSDI score (23).

In this study, increased use of electronic devices and increased hours of reading was positively correlated with a higher OSDI score. The findings correlate with previous studies stating higher OSDI score in electronic device users with 7-8 hours of computer use daily (24),(25). Reduction of blink frequency and incomplete blinking during electronic device use contribute to accelerated tear evaporation, leading to tear film instability and dry eye symptoms (26),(27). Out of 146 participants, 42 (28%) had prior DED symptoms. This study revealed that mean OSDI score was significantly higher in subjects with previous DED symptoms confirming similar findings that had been reported by Krolo I et al., (10). The mean OSDI score was lower in subjects with usage of OCPs and subjects who had reached menopause, although the association was not statistically significant. In a study by Sharma A et al., subjects on OCPs showed decreased Schirmer’s test values, as compared to control group. The tear film stability was also significantly reduced in women taking oral contraceptives (28). Tear production and function is also effected by the level of circulating androgen. Perimenopausal women are more likely to develop DED and hormonal influences play a role as indicated by various studies (29).

The mean OSDI score was higher in subjects applying antiglaucoma drops. This correlates with existing study that state that antiglaucoma drops leads to adverse changes in tear film stability and tear osmolarity (17). Whether face mask use was solely responsible for worsening of symptoms of DED need to be elucidated.

Limitation(s)

Limitations of the study include subjective nature of OSDI score, lack of clinical confirmation of DED, incomplete data on ophthalmic history, medical history and systemic disease. Future studies with larger population are needed to confirm and explain the findings.

Conclusion

This study provided novel data regarding MADE incidence in healthcare professionals. It established face mask use, especially surgical and cloth mask use as a risk factor for the development of dry eye. N95 mask wear was associated with lesser incidence of DED compared to surgical and cloth mask. Hence, the optimum fitting of face mask in healthcare settings is essential to avoid air from escaping upwards and the development of dry eye. Other risk factors for MADE included female gender, pre-existing DED, electronic device use and prolonged reading hours. Healthcare professionals should limit the use of electronic devices during the pandemic. Frequent blinking during reading and electronic device usage and putting lubricating drops is also warranted.

References

1.
Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, et al. TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report. The Ocular Surface. 2017;15(3):276-83. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Darrell W. MADE: A new coronavirus-associated eye disease [Internet]. HEALIO. COM. 2020 [cited 2022 Sep 1]. Available from: https://www.healio.com/news/ ophthalmology/20200622/blog-a-new-coronavirusassociated-eye-disease.
3.
Song P, Xia W, Wang M, Chang X, Wang J, Jin S, et al. Variations of dry eye disease prevalence by age, sex and geographic characteristics in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2018;8(2):020503. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Farrand KF, Fridman M, Stillman IÖ, Schaumberg DA. Prevalence of diagnosed dry eye disease in the United States among adults aged 18 years and older. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2017;182:90-98. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Titiyal JS, Falera RC, Kaur M, Sharma V, Sharma N. Prevalence and risk factors of dry eye disease in North India: Ocular surface disease index-based cross-sectional hospital study. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2018;66(2):207. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Dana R, Bradley JL, Guerin A, Pivneva I, Stillman IÖ, Evans AM, et al. Estimated prevalence and incidence of dry eye disease based on coding analysis of a large, all-age United States healthcare system. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2019;202:47-54. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Moshirfar M, West WB, Marx DP. Face mask-associated ocular irritation and dryness. Ophthalmology and Therapy. 2020;9:397-400. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Hayirci E, Yagci A, Palamar M, Basoglu OK, Veral A. The effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome on the ocular surface. Cornea. 2012;31(6):604-08. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Boccardo L. Self-reported symptoms of mask-associated dry eye: A survey study of 3,605 people. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2022;45(2):101408. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Krolo I, Blazeka M, Merdzo I, Vrtar I, Sabol I, Petric-Vickovic I. Mask-associated dry eye during COVID-19 pandemic-how face masks contribute to dry eye disease symptoms. Med Arch. 2021;75(2):144-48. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Dougherty BE, Nichols JJ, Nichols KK. Rasch analysis of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(12):8630-35. Doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8027. PMID: 21948646; PMCID: PMC3230285. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2000;118(5):615-21. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Qian L, Wei W. Identified risk factors for dry eye syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos One. 2022;17(8):e0271267. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Karakus S, Mathews PM, Agrawal D, Henrich C, Ramulu PY, Akpek EK. Impact of dry eye on prolonged reading. Optometry and Vision Science. 2018;95(12):1105-13. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Asiedu K, Kyei S, Boampong F, Ocansey S. Symptomatic dry eye and its associated factors: A study of university undergraduate students in Ghana. Eye & Contact Lens. 2017;43(4):262-66. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Lurati AR. Menopause and dry eye syndrome. Nursing for Women’s Health. 2019;23(1):71-78. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Wong AB, Wang MT, Liu K, Prime ZJ, Danesh-Meyer HV, Craig JP. Exploring topical anti-glaucoma medication effects on the ocular surface in the context of the current understanding of dry eye. The Ocular Surface. 2018;16(3):289-93. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Miller KL, Walt JG, Mink DR, Satram-Hoang S, Wilson SE, Perry HD, et al. Minimal clinically important difference for the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(1):94-101. Doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.356. PMID: 20065224. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Dag U, Çaglayan M, Öncül H, Vardar S, Alaus MF. Mask-associated dry eye syndrome in healthcare professionals as a new complication caused by the prolonged use of masks during Covid-19 pandemic period. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2022;30(1):01-06. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, Jalbert I, Lekhanont K, Malet F, et al. TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:334-65. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Giannaccare G, Vaccaro S, Mancini A, Scorcia V. Dry eye in the COVID-19 era: How the measures for controlling pandemic might harm ocular surface. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258(11):2567-68. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Shah PV, Zhu L, Kazi A, Zhu A, Shalshin A. The correlation between non- invasive ventilation use and the development of dry eye disease. Cureus. 2021;13(9):e18280. [crossref]
23.
Scalinci SZ, Pacella E, Battagliola ET. Prolonged face mask use might worsen dry eye symptoms. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021;69(6):1508. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Bayhan HA, Bayhan SA, Muhafiz E, Gürdal C. Evaluation of the dry eye parameters and tear osmolarity in computer users. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol. 2014;23:167-71.
25.
Uchino M, Yokoi N, Uchino Y, Dogru M, Kawashima M, Komuro A, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease and its risk factors in visual display terminal users: The Osaka study. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013;156(4):759-66. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Argilés M, Cardona G, Pérez-Cabré E, Rodríguez M. Blink rate and incomplete blinks in six different controlled hard-copy and electronic reading conditions. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2015;56(11):6679-85. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Chu CA, Rosenfield M, Portello JK. Blink patterns: Reading from a computer screen versus hard copy. Optometry and Vision Science. 2014;91(3):297-302. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Sharma A, Porwal S, Tyagi M. Effect of oral contraceptives on tear film in reproductive age group women. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018;7(3):860-64. [crossref]
29.
Ablamowicz AF, Nichols JJ, Nichols KK. Association between serum levels of testosterone and estradiol with meibomian gland assessments in postmenopausal women. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:295-300.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/58092.17902

Date of Submission: Jun 11, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 02, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Feb 28, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? NA
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 18, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 20, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Feb 27, 2023 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com