Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 87193

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : MR01 - MR05 Full Version

Deciphering Deep Neck Space Infections and its Management: A Case Series


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63211.17743
Nitha, Ajitha Tavvala, M Swarnapriya, Reshma Radhakrishnan Nair, PA Famida

1. Assistant Professor, Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India. 3. Resident, Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India. 4. Postgraduate, Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India. 5. Postgraduate, Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Nitha Thomas,
Assistant Professor, Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, AIMS, B.G. Nagara, Mandya-571448, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: drnitha@bgsaims.edu.in

Abstract

Deep Neck Space Infections (DNSI), which affect the potential deep cervical spaces often have a rapid onset and given their life-threatening complications, pose a significant challenge. For the most part, these infections arise from local extension of infections from a septic foci which is mostly of odontogenic and periodontal origin. A case series of neck space infections, their presentation, management and recovery is presented here. Although Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) scan has been touted as a routine investigation of deep neck infections, it is found that imaging by ultrasound saves time and resources and is of immense diagnostic value in localising and delineating the exact space involved and detecting impending complications so as to pre-empt it. Also, true to the maxim, “…never let the sun set on an undrained abscess”, surgical drainage on the first day even in stable cases followed by an empiric course of high dose broad spectrum antibiotics resulted in faster recovery.

Keywords

Dental abscess, Masticator space infection, Neck abscess, Submandibular space infection, Suppurative lymphadenitis in neck, Tooth decay, Trismus in neck abscess, Ultrasound in neck abscess

Mosher HP, said of deep neck infections, “Pus in the neck calls for the surgeon’s best judgement, his best skill and often for all his courage” (1). DNSI refers to bacterial infections in the complex potential spaces and fascial planes of the neck, either with cellulitis or an abscess formation in both children and adults (2).

Currently the primary source of deep neck infection in adults is odontogenic as opposed to oropharyngeal causes in children, and constitutes 31-49% of DNSI, with bacterial biofilms playing a key role in 65-80%, thus establishing a strong association with poor oral hygiene and lower socio-economic status [3-5]. The source of infection is not clinically apparent in 17-57% of DNSI. It is seen more in males than females by a ratio of 1.6:1 and can occur at any age, but is most common in the 3rd to 5th decades (6).

Early diagnosis and management is essential to avert potentially serious or even fatal complications with special care in elderly, diabetics and immunocompromised patients.

Case Report

Case 1

A 45-year-old female presented with a swelling over the left cheek which was insidious in onset, gradually progressive and was associated with severe pain, restricted mouth opening and toothache since three days. There was no history of fever, upper respiratory tract infection, sore throat, difficulty in swallowing and breathing or other co-morbidities. Examination revealed a swelling measuring 8×7 cm over the left masticator and submandibular spaces. On palpation, it was tender, firm and fluctuant with a local rise of temperature. Mouth opening was restricted to 2.5 cm.

Ultrasound showed an ill-defined hypoechoic collection with fine internal echoes measuring approximately 15 mL involving the subcutaneous plane of left buccal space extending into the masticator space along the masseter muscle. Inferiorly, it extended into the submandibular space. Submandibular and parotid glands appeared normal with no evidence of focal lesion/collection. Incision and drainage was done on the first day under aseptic precautions. Around 10-15 mL of frank pus was drained and sent for culture and sensitivity. On opening the loculi, therapeutic irrigation with a mixture of 20 mL betadine (5% povidone-iodine) and 5 mL of 3% hydrogen peroxide solution was done. Betadine soaked wick was placed to facilitate drainage. The procedure was continued for five days, by the end of which, the pus discharge was minimal. Broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics-ceftriaxone and sulbactum with metronidazole (Injections Gramocef S 1.5 gm BD and Metrogyl 100 mL TID), an analgesic-diclofenac sodium (Injection Diclogesic RR 75 mg BD) was started empirically on day one with an antireflux medication-rabeprazole with domperidone (tab. cyra D 50 mg BD) for four days.

Complete blood picture showed leukocytosis with a count of 16,930 cells/cu mm. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) was 25 mm/hour. Gram stained smear viewed under conventional compound microscopy revealed occasional pus cells and gram positive cocci. Culture yielded no growth after 48 hours of aerobic incubation. Dental examination on day five revealed deep dental caries with apical periodontitis in the lower left 1st and 2nd molars for which extraction was advised. Patient was discharged on the 6th day with an oral antibiotic-cefixime and potassium clavulanate (Tab. Gramocef CV 325 mg BD) and an analgesic-aceclofenac and paracetamol (Tab. Hifenac P 425 mg) which continued from day four for five more days. The patient was diagnosed with left masticator and submandibular spaces infection and is fine on a follow-up of one and a half years (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2).

bCase 2

A 77-year-old female presented with a swelling over the left side of the neck since one week. It was insidious in onset, gradually progressive and was associated with severe anterior cervical pain and difficulty in swallowing since three days. There was no history of fever, cold, cough, sore throat, toothache, difficulty in breathing or change in voice. Patient was on medication for diabetes and hypertension since three years.

Examination revealed a diffuse swelling measuring 12×10 cm in the left submandibular and anterior cervical spaces extending upto the posterior triangle and crossing the midline upto the medial border of sternocleidomastoid muscle. It was soft to firm in consistency, fluctuant and tender on palpation. Skin over the swelling was erythematous with a local rise of temperature. An oropharyngeal examination revealed a partially edentulous dentition with tenderness over the floor of mouth. Complete blood picture revealed leukocytosis with 19,340 cells/cu mm. Blood sugar levels were deranged with a fasting blood sugar of 504 mg/dL and postprandial sugar of 630 mg/dL. HbA1c level was 14.9%. Creatinine level was 1.2 mg/dL and blood urea was 67 mmol/L.

Ultrasound revealed an ill-defined hypoechoic collection with fine internal echoes measuring about 30 mL in the subcutaneous plane involving the left submental, submandibular and anterior cervical spaces extending medially across the midline upto the medial border of sternocleidomastoid muscle. Inferior extension was upto the clavicle with no retrosternal extension. Diffuse inflammatory changes were noted in the subcutaneous fat with increased echogenicity and vascularity suggestive of cellulitis. No extension of collection into the floor of mouth, carotid and anterior visceral spaces were seen. Submandibular glands appeared normal. Few enlarged hypoechoic lymph nodes with loss of fatty hilum were noted in the left cervical level 2 and 3 lymph nodes suggestive of necrotic lymphadenopathy secondary to an infective or neoplastic aetiology. Right cervical lymphadenopathy was also noted.

Incision and drainage was done on the first day. Around 20-25 mL of pus was drained and sent for culture and sensitivity. Betadine soaked wick was placed after therapeutic irrigation with a mixture of 40 mL betadine (5% povidone-iodine) and 10 mL of 3% hydrogen peroxide solution twice a day for six days. Patient was started empirically on intravenous antibiotics-ceftriaxone and sulbactum with metronidazole (Injections Gramocef S 1.5 gm BD and Metrogyl 100 mL TID), an analgesic-diclofenac sodium (Injection Diclogesic RR 75 mg BD), insulin injection (Human Actrapid 18- 18-10 units), antireflux-rabeprazole with domperidone (Tab. Cyra D 50 mg BD) and antihypertensive medications-atenolol (Tab. Aten 25 mg BD) for seven days.

Gram stained smear revealed many pus cells and gram negative bacilli. Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) stain of the pus revealed no acid-fast bacilli. Culture yielded no growth after 48 hours of aerobic incubation. Discharge stopped completely within a week and the patient was discharged with an oral antibiotic-cefixime and potassium clavulanate (Tab. Gramocef CV 325 mg BD) and an analgesic-aceclofenac and paracetamol (Tab. Hifenac P 425 mg) for five days along with an oral hypoglycaemic-glimepiride, metformin and pioglitazone (Tab. Sugamide PM 1 mg BD) and an antihypertensive drug-atenolol (Tab. Aten 25 mg BD). Anterior cervical skin loss secondary to the incision and drainage healed by secondary intention in four weeks. The patient was diagnosed with left submandibular and anterior cervical spaces infection secondary to suppurative lymphadenitis and is fine on a follow-up of one and a half years (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4).

Case 3

A 40-year-old male presented with swelling over the left side of face and neck since four days. It was insidious in onset and gradually progressive. It was associated with painful swallowing and restricted neck movements. There was no history of fever, upper respiratory tract infection, difficulty in breathing or other co-morbidities. Examination 2revealed a 12×15 cm swelling over the left side of face extending from the tragus to the clavicle involving the parotid, submandibular, anterior cervical spaces and posterior triangle. It was tender and firm in consistency. Mouth opening was adequate and examination of the oropharynx was normal. Ultrasound revealed an ill-defined heterogenous collection with predominant air foci measuring about 80-100 mL involving the left parotid, submandibular, anterior cervical spaces and posterior triangle extending upto the left anterior chest wall. Diffuse inflammatory changes with increased echogenicity and vascularity suggestive of cellulitis were also noted.

Hypoechoic enlarged lymph nodes were noted in the parotid gland and left levels 2 and 3. Complete blood picture revealed leukocytosis (21,870 cells/cu mm). ESR was 98 mm/hr. Liver function tests were deranged (SGOT-123 U/L, SGPT-204 U/L and ALP-185 U/L). Incision and drainage was done on the first day under aseptic precautions. Around 40-50 mL of foul smelling frank pus was drained and sent for culture and sensitivity. Betadine soaked wick was placed after therapeutic irrigation with 40 mL betadine (5% povidone-iodine) and 10 mL of 3% hydrogen peroxide twice a day for seven days. Broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics-ceftriaxone and sulbactum with metronidazole (Injections Gramocef S 1.5 gm BD and Metrogyl 100 mL TID) and an analgesic-diclofenac sodium (Diclogesic RR 75 mg BD) was started empirically on day one with an antireflux medication-rabeprazole with domperidone (Tab. Cyra D 50 mg BD) for seven days.

The patient was discharged with an oral antibiotic-cefixime with potassium clavulanate (Tab. Gramocef CV 325 mg BD) and an analgesic-aceclofenac with paracetamol (Tab. Hifenac P 425 mg BD) for seven days. Gram stained smear viewed under conventional compound microscopy reported pus cells with gram positive cocci and gram negative coccobacilli. Culture yielded no growth after 48 hours of aerobic incubation. The patient was diagnosed with left parotid, submandibular and anterior cervical spaces infection extending upto the thorax and is fine on a follow-up of six months (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

Grodinsky M and Holyoke E, noted “the cervical fasciae appear in a new form under the pen of each author who attempts to describe them” (7). The cervical fascia is divided into the superficial and deep fascia. The deep fascia is subdivided into three layers, the superficial layer (investing layer), middle layer with the muscular and visceral layers, and deep layer with the alar and prevertebral fascia (8). On the other hand, “the fascial planes are potential areas between layers of fascia. These areas are normally filled with loose connective tissue, which readily breakdown when invaded by infection” as stated by Shapiro DS and Schwartz DR (9).

The deep spaces may be classified as spaces localised above the hyoid level like peritonsillar, parapharyngeal, submandibular, sublingual, parotid, masticator and temporal spaces, spaces that involve the entire circumference of the neck which include retropharyngeal, prevertebral and anterior visceral and the suprasternal space below the hyoid bone (8). Holmes CJ and Pellecchia R, also divided the deep neck spaces into primary and secondary fascial spaces. Infection may directly spread into the primary space, or may spread via a primary space to the secondary space (10).

Infections of odontogenic and submandibular origin affect the investing layer, which includes the submandibular and masticator spaces. Infections of the 2nd and 3rd molars also affect the middle layer, where infection can spread inferior to the dentate line of the mandible (11). Peritonsillitis causes in 7-20% of the DNSI. Acute rhinosinusitis, salivary gland infections, sialolithiasis, cervical lymphadenitis, cellulitis of skin, necrotic malignant lymph nodes, infected cysts of branchial clefts and thyroglossal duct, laryngocoeles, acute mastoiditis progressing to a Bezold’s abscess, Diabetes Mellitus (DM), mycobacterial and thyroid infections are causes worth mentioning (6),(8),(12),(13),(14).

The microbiology is polymicrobial reflecting normal endogenous upper aerodigestive tract flora which comprise a wide range of aerobic, microaerophilic, facultative and anaerobic bacteria, fungal species, viruses and even protozoans. Recent 16rRNA sequencing methods have detected 600 species of which, aerobic streptococcus species and non streptococcal anaerobes are the chief offending agents (15),(16). Greater prevalence of facultative or obligate anaerobes and a limited number of streptococcus (S.pyogenes, S.milleri, S.viridans group) are reflected in dental infections as 60% of oral flora cannot be cultured by routine culture methods (17),(18). Anaerobes are Peptostreptococcus, Fusobacterium and Bacteriodes (Prevotella) (19). Liberal use of antibiotics and inherently fastidious anaerobic organisms could pose a challenge to culture the causative organism in 25% of cases (20).

Generalised inflammatory symptoms such as pain, fever, swelling, malaise, fatigue, redness and localising symptoms of odynophagia, dysphagia, dyspnoea, hot potato voice, hoarseness, sialorrhoea, trismus, otalgia, torticollis and cough direct the clinician towards a possible site of infection and potential severity (17),(21). Immunocompromised status like DM, HIV or steroid use should be accounted for with a higher level of vigilance as they are susceptible to more virulent organisms and disease progression can be aggressive and fatal (8). Pulse rate, blood pressure, temperature and respiratory rate recording is mandatory. Spiking temperatures should raise concerns of septicaemia, thrombophlebitis of Internal Jugular Vein (IJV) or mediastinal extension. A normal pulse oximetry reading is a poor proxy for airway status as it does not typically fall until airway is completely occluded (17).

Common clinical signs include pyrexia, swelling in the neck, tenderness or fluctuance, crepitus caused by airway trauma or gas producing organisms and lymphadenopathy. An oropharyngeal examination for signs of inflammation, asymmetry and uvular deviation is important (8). Trismus and swelling indicate that the infection has spread to the muscles of mastication involving masseteric, pterygoid, retropharyngeal or parapharyngeal spaces. An alveolar swelling and decayed, loose, tender, broken tooth or a periapical infection would reveal an odontogenic infection (17).

A Complete Blood Count (CBC) with a differential demonstrates leukocytosis. Steroid related leukocytosis can potentially confound a clinical picture but should not be withheld in case of an upper airway inflammation. A lack of leukocytosis may indicate viral illness, immunodeficiency, or tumours (17). Patients with HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) and tuberculosis exhibit persistent leucopenia with a count of <8000 per milliliter prompting a screening (8). Urea, creatinine, C-reactive protein, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and electrolyte assays should be assessed. Blood and aspirate cultures are recommended. Positive gram stain cultures without growth points toward an anaerobic organism (8),(17).

Radiographic evaluation is done using X-rays, ultrasound, Computed Tomography (CT) scan and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). For dental focal infections or infections of unknown aetiology, an orthopantomogram is acquired. Translucencies at the apex of the dental root are a common finding with dental related abscess (8),(17).

Ultrasound offers potential advantages of being safe, less expensive, portable, non invasive and can be performed at the bedside even in patients with impaired organ functions as it does not require contrast. In view of non ionising waves, multiple exposures can be carried out with a reduced long-term harm. A unique feature is the ability to recognise and verify deep body organs and lesions having similar density on conventional radiographic studies. Sonographic reduction of echo intensity is indicative of an abscess. Accurate dimensions of the abscess cavity and its precise depth below the skin surface can be ascertained. It shows internal muscle structures more clearly than CT with the aid of high resolution transducer (22). (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9),(Table/Fig 10) shows USG images of collection, dimensions, depth, air foci and cervical lymphadenopathy in cases of an abscess formation.

In a CECT scan, an abscess demonstrates a central area of hypodensity with a characteristic rim enhancement of its wall with air being a strong predictor. Compromised images due to the presence of metal materials, radiation exposure in serial scans, contrast dye or iodine allergies and inability to use in patients with impaired renal functions are some of its noteworthy limitations (8),(23). MRI provides superior soft tissue differentiation but high cost and contraindication in patients with metal or electrical implants and dyspnoea are its constraints (24).

Management includes control of the airway, effective antibiotic therapy, timely aspiration or surgical intervention. The most crucial step is to protect airway as hypoxia and asphyxia remain the primary causes of mortality. First line airway management includes oxygenated face tent with cool mist humidity, intravenous steroids and nebulised epinephrine to reduce mucosal oedema. Endotracheal intubation, awake fiberoptic intubation or tracheostomy are other options if the need arises (25).

Medical management includes an empiric broad spectrum antibiotic coverage reflecting the clinical scenario. Penicillin in combination with or without a beta-lactamase-resistant antibiotic (amoxicillin/clavulanate) or second/third generation cephalosporins along with a drug effective against anaerobes like metronidazole or clindamycin can be used. Eikenella corrodens seen in odontogenic infections respond to fluoroquinolones but should not be used in pregnancy or children. Parenteral antibiotics is to be continued after surgical drainage until patient is afebrile for 48 hours, and then switched to an oral agent for two weeks (6),(8),(17).

The main goals of surgical treatment are to provide sample for tissue staining and culture, therapeutic irrigation of infected body cavity and a stable external drainage pathway to prevent reaccumulation of an abscess. Various modalities are needle aspiration, transoral incision and drainage and conventional surgical drainage. Ultrasound-guided aspiration of pus in deeper collections merited a 41% cost reduction, shorter duration of hospital stay, no difference in treatment efficacy or complication rates (17),(26). Also, aspiration helps in increasing the isolation of anaerobes and reduces the detection of potential skin contaminants when compared to swabs (6).

Surgical intervention usually follows a period of conservative management of 24-48 hours in stable patients if there is a clinical failure to respond. Location of incision is dictated by excellent anatomic exposure and cosmetic healing with minimal risk to vital structures following the shortest route from outside or over maximum area of fluctuation or induration. The abscess wall is curetted and any loculations between adjacent and communicating neck spaces are broken down. The space is thoroughly irrigated and larger wounds needing debridement will remain open and packed with antimicrobial iodoform to allow healing by secondary intention (6),(8),(27),(28).

Complications are common in cases of delayed diagnosis and in immunocompromised hosts with co-morbid conditions and include pneumonia, carotid artery aneurysm and rupture, IJV thrombosis with septic emboli or Lemierre’s syndrome, necrotising fasciitis, vocal and facial palsies, skin fistulae and defects, Horner’s Syndrome, descending mediastinitis, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, iatrogenic bleeding following tracheostomy insertion, sepsis, cavernous sinus thrombosis, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, multiorgan failure and death (6),(29),(30).

Conclusion

The Deep Neck Space Infections (DNSI) can affect patients of all ages with or without pre-existing co-morbid conditions. In this series, the first case was of dental origin, second case was due to suppurative lymphadenitis in an elderly patient with co-morbidities and the reason for the third case was not apparent. All the patients recovered in a week’s time. Skin loss in the second case took nearly a month to heal by secondary intention probably owing to the patient’s advanced age and diabetes. Without an impending airway compromise, surgical intervention usually follows a period of conservative management of 24-48 hours. Though all patients were stable, incision and drainage was done on the first day allowing for greater availability of medications in pus-filled spaces limited by poor vascularity. Ultrasound as the radiological modality and surgical drainage on day one led to a faster recovery of patients. Dictated by the clinical scenario, it can be advocated as a preferred management option, thus saving resources and time along with a shorter duration of hospital stay in the management of DNSI.

References

1.
Mosher HP. The submaxillary fossa approach to deep pus in the neck. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol.1929;34:19-36.
2.
Kataria G, Saxena A, Bhagat S, Singh B, Kaur M, Kaur G. Deep neck space infections: A study of 76 cases. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;27:293-299.
3.
Larawin V, Naipao J, Dubey SP. Head and neck space infections. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135:889-93. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Eftekharian A, Roozbahany NA, Vaezeafshar R, Narimani N. Deep neck infections: A retrospective review of 112 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266:273-77. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001;358:135. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Moor JW. Neck Space Infections. In: Clarke RW, Watkinson JC, editors. Scott-Brown’s Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery. 8th ed. Florida: Taylor and Francis; 2019: Pp.623-32.
7.
Grodinsky M, Holyoke E. The fasciae and fascial spaces of the head, neck and adjacent regions. Am J Anat. 1938;63:367-408. [crossref]
8.
Aynehchi BB, Har-El G. Deep Neck Infection. In: Johnson J, editor. Bailey’s Head and Neck Surgery-Otolaryngology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014: Pp.794-816.
9.
Shapiro DS, Schwartz DR. Exposure of laboratory workers to Francisella tularensis despite a bioterrorism procedure. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:2278-81. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Holmes CJ, Pellecchia R. Antimicrobial therapy in management of odontogenic infections in general dentistry. Dental Clin. 2016;60:497-507. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Almuqamam M, Gonzalez FJ, Kondamudi NP. Deep Neck Infections In: StatPearls [Internet]. 2022 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513262/.
12.
Bakir S, Tanriverdi MH, Gun R, Yorgancilar AE, Yildirim M, Tekbas¸ G, et al. Deep neck space infections: A retrospective review of 173 cases. American J Otolaryngol. 2012;33:56-63. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Parhiscar A, Har-El G. Deep neck abscess: A retrospective review of 210 cases. Ann Otol Laryngol. 2001;110:1051-54. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Nour YA, Hassan MH, Gaafar A, Eldaly A. Deep neck infections of congenital causes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144:365-71. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Lee YQ, Kanagalingam J. Bacteriology of deep neck abscesses: A retrospective review of 96 consecutive cases. Singapore Med J. 2011;52:351-55. [crossref]
16.
Riggio MP, Aga H, Murray CA, Jackson MS, Lennon A, Hammersley N, et al. Identification of bacteria associated with spreading odontogenic infections by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 2007;103:610-17. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Christian JM, Goddard AC, Gillespie MB. Deep Neck and Odontogenic Infections. In: Flint PW, Francis HW, Haughey BH, Lesperance MM, editors. Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020. Pp.164-75.
18.
Fujii R, Saito Y, Tokura Y, Nakagawa KI, Okuda K, Ishihara K. Characterization of bacterial flora in persistent apical periodontitis lesions. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2009;24:502. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Brook I. Anaerobic bacteria in upper respiratory tract and other head and neck infections. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002;111:430-40. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Huang TT, Liu TC, Chen PR, Tseng FY, Yeh TH, Chen YS. Deep neck infection: Analysis of 185 cases. Head Neck. 2004; 26: 854-60. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Crespo AN, Chone CT, Fonseca AS, Montenegro MC, Pereira R, Milani JA. Clinical versus computed tomography evaluation in the diagnosis and management of deep neck infection. Sao Paulo Med J. 2004;122(6):259-63. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Gudi SS, Sarvadnya J, Hallur N, Sikkerimath BC. Ultrasound guided drainage of submasseteric space abscesses. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013;3:31-34. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Freling N, Roele E, Schaefer-Prokop C, Fokkens W. Prediction of deep neck abscesses by contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in 76 clinically suspect consecutive patients. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:1745-52. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Smith JL II, Hsu JM, Chang J. Predicting deep neck space abscess using computed tomography. Am J Otolaryngol. 2006;27:244-47. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Karkos PD, Leong SC, Beer H, Apostolidou MT, Panarese A. Challenging airways in deep neck space infections. Am J Otolaryngol. 2007;28:415-18. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Biron VL, Kurien G, Dziegielewski P, Barber B, Seikaly H. Surgical vs ultrasound-guided drainage of deep neck space abscesses: A randomized controlled trial: Surgical vs ultrasound drainage. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;42:18-23. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Jayagandhi S, Cheruvu SC, Manimaran V, Mohanty S. Deep neck space infection: Study of 52 cases. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71:923-26. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Tiwana H, Gupta S, Prakash DN, Panda N, Chetan B, Angrup A, et al. Current trends in pathogenesis, management, bacteriology, and antibiotic resistance in deep neck space infections: An institutional review. Ann Indian Acad Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;4:05-09.[crossref]
29.
Gehrke T, Scherzad A, Hagen R, Hackenberg S. Deep neck infections with and without mediastinal involvement: treatment and outcome in 218 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;279:1585-92. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Swain SK, Lenka S, Jena PP. Deep neck abscess: Our experiences at a tertiary care teaching Hospital of Eastern India. Matrix Sci Med. 2022;6:18-22.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63211.17743

Date of Submission: Feb 01, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 21, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Mar 25, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 10, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 14, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 24, 2023 (4%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com