Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 74949

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : MD01 - MD03 Full Version

Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman Disease of the Nasal Septum: A Case Report


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61588.17751
Santosh Prasad Kesari, Kartikeya Ojha, Piyush, HR Sohan Rao

1. Associate Professor, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Sikkim Manipal University, Gangtok, Sikkim, India. 2. Intern, Sikkim Manipal University, Gangtok, Sikkim, India. 3. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Sikkim Manipal University, Gangtok, Sikkim, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, Sikkim Manipal University, Gangtok, Sikkim, India.

Correspondence Address :
Santosh Prasad Kesari,
Associate Professor, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Central Referral Hospital, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences, 5th Mile, Tadong, Gangtok-737102, Sikkim, India.
E-mail: santosh4uma@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Rosai-Dorfman Disease (RDD) is a rare, benign histiocytic proliferative disorder mostly involving the lymph nodes. Extranodal disease can occur in the skin and soft tissue including the mucosal surface, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract and breast. Here, a case of a 17-year-old Indo-asian girl is presented, who came to the Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Outpatient Department (OPD) with a mass in her left nostril for the past two years. A sessile globular mass from the left nasal septum was seen during diagnostic visual endoscopy. A Computerised Tomography (CT) scan of the paranasal sinus revealed a rather large right maxillary sinus with a soft tissue density lesion filling it and obliterating the osteomeatal complex, while blood tests revealed an increased eosinophilic count. The nasal tumour was removed, and its histological analysis revealed characteristics of RDD. This is typically sporadic histiocytosis with emperipolesis in the cells. Clinically, the condition is benign, and all that is required is conservative therapy and periodic monitoring of its progression. Surgical excision is rarely advised until the disease has grown to an unmanageable size and is causing respiratory impairment or a cosmetic deformity. Currently, therapy revolves around surgical and immunosuppressive treatments, but the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management of RDD remains to be defined.

Keywords

Deviated nasal septum, Histiocytosis, Inferior turbinate hypertrophy, Septal mass

Case Report

An 17-year-old Indo-asian girl reported to the ENT OPD with complaints of nasal mass in the left nostril for the past two years. The swelling was gradually progressive in size and painful to the touch; it was associated with a running nose and frequent sneezing. There was also a history of snoring and recurrent allergy to dust in the past two years, which were being treated with topical nasal drops and antihistaminics. The allergies were exacerbated during the winter season. The swelling did not bleed on the touch. There was no history of discharge.

A physical examination of the nose revealed a globular mass arising from the left-side of the nasal septum with the deviated nasal septum towards the right-side and a nasal spur on the right-side. A sessile globular mass from the left nasal septum was visualised on diagnostic nasal endoscopy. Laboratory investigations revealed an elevated eosinophilic count (>40×103/uL).

A CT scan of the paranasal sinus revealed that the left maxillary sinus was relatively enlarged in size, with a soft tissue density lesion filling it and obliterating the osteomeatal complex. The periosteal reaction was seen circumferentially along the inner margin of the right maxillary sinus. A soft tissue density polypoidal lesion was seen along the left lateral margin of the nasal septum, measuring 18×22×27 mm in craniocaudal×transverse×anteroposterior dimensions. Mild mucosal thickening was seen in the right frontal, bilateral ethmoid, bilateral sphenoid and left maxillary sinuses (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2).

The nasal septum deviated to the right-side with hypertrophy of the left inferior turbinate. The left osteomeatal complex was normal. Bilateral orbital margins were intact, and the overlying soft tissue was normal. All preoperative investigations, including complete blood count (excluding eosinophilic count), serum electrolytes, viral markers including Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Liver Function Tests (LFTs), Kidney Function Tests (KFTs), Prothrombin Time (PT), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT), chest X-ray were within normal limits. Under general anaesthesia, the growth was surgically removed, and the left inferior turbinoplasty was performed using a debrider. The pre-operative view of the left nostril showing the smooth swelling arising from the nasal septum on the left-side can be seen in (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4). The intraoperative view of the septal mass removed in to can be seen in (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6). Postoperative view of the raw area of nasal septum after removal of septal mass can be seen in (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8). With ‘A’ being the Nasal Septum, ‘B’ being the Inferior Turbinate, and ‘C’ being the globular mass in each figure.

The mass was excised as a whole and sent for histopathological examination (Table/Fig 9). It revealed fragmented tissue bits focally lined by respiratory epithelium showing mild reactive atypia. Stroma showed dense and diffused chronic inflammatory cells with sheets of small non cleaved lymphocytes, many plasma cells with rare cells showing binucleation, scattered histiocytes and occasional histiocytes showing emperipolesis of intact lymphocytes and rare occasional eosinophils. In places, stroma showed oedema. No evidence of atypical cells and bizarre cells, atypical mitosis, granuloma, or fungal elements in the section. The finding was consistent with RDD [Table/Fig-10-13]. After two weeks of the surgery, the patient was followed-up and maintained optimum health.

Discussion

The RDD is a rare condition with a prevalence of 1:200000 and an estimated 100 new cases yearly in the United States (1). RDD is rare in India, only about a dozen cases have been reported, mostly in children and very few in adults (2). It is a malignant, non Langerhans cell histiocytosis of unknown cause characterised by an accumulation of activated histiocytes within the affected tissue. RDD is more prevalent in men and people of African origin, with the cutaneous variant being more prevalent in Asian women (3). Constitutional symptoms and laboratory signs of inflammation may exist but are not mandatory (4). Although, it is widely documented in lymph nodes and other organs, it is frequently not recognised in soft tissues. RDD exists in two main varieties: solely Cutaneous RDD (CRDD) and one that affects the lymph nodes and, in some cases, extranodal organs [5,6]. The classic presentation of RDD consists of bilateral, massive and painless cervical lymphadenopathy with or without intermittent fevers, night sweats and weight loss (7). The extranodal illness, which most frequently affects the skin, nasal cavity and orbit, develops in about 43% of individuals (8). The testes, spleen and salivary glands may be affected (9),(10). Although, highly unusual, cutaneous illness without lymphadenopathy has been seen (11),(12).

Nasal obstruction and epistaxis are two frequent symptoms brought on by the extranodal invasion of the sinuses and nasal cavity. Rarely is the nasal septum invaded. Leukocytosis and an accelerated Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) typically describe laboratory findings. Due to the lack of pathognomonic clinical characteristics, nasal RDD is frequently misdiagnosed in clinical practice (13). The absence of typical RDD symptoms at the presentation made it difficult to diagnose present case. Despite laboratory results indicating eosinophilia, her body temperature, ESR and other organ involvement were all within normal range. Raje P and Vyas P, reported a case in India of a 58-year-old female patient with extranodal RDD of nasal septal mucosa without lymphadenopathy who had presented with complaints of difficulty in breathing and frequent episodes of epistaxis for three months (2).

Wang J et al., presented a case of a 55-year-old woman who presented to the hospital with nasal dorsum collapse while wearing her glasses with occasional epistaxis. Wang J et al., reported a similar observation in which the patient had no clinical signs of RDD and the laboratory results only revealed leukocytosis (13). A case by Akyigit A et al., reports a similar finding: 15-year-old male patient: the mass completely filled the left nasal meatus and caused difficulty in breathing through both nasal meatus while deviating the septum to the right (14). The present case is of an Asian Indian girl with RDD with nasal obstruction without any lymphadenopathy, making it very rare.

The traits of RDD in bone and soft tissue are ambiguous and frequently deceptive. Erdheim-Chester disease, lymphoma, plasma cell myeloma and metastatic disease are among the differential diagnosis (15). Several differential diagnosis (nasal polyp, inferior turbinate hypertrophy and nasal tumours) were ruled out in the present instance. As the mass is arising from the septum and it is firm too hard in consistency, the possibility of the nasal polyp was ruled out clinically. As the mass was attached to the septum and on probe test there was no lateral attachment, and inferior turbinate hypertrophy was ruled out. The mass did not bleed on touch which is contrary to the findings reported by Raje P and Vyas P and Wang J et al., (2),(13) and there was no bone erosion as noted on the CT-PNS scan which was contrary to the case reported by Wang J et al., the possibility of nasal tumours was ruled out (13).

The RDD is characterised histologically by an attenuated dermal infiltration of pale histiocytes and lymphoplasma cells of varying sizes (16). These histiocytes have single prominent nucleoli and round or oval vesicular nuclei with well-defined, delicate nuclear membranes. Neutrophils and eosinophils are occasionally seen. RDD is incredibly uncommon, the lesions are clinically varied, and it can mimic various conditions, including other histiocytoses, lymphomas, sarcoidosis, viral diseases and other histiocytoses (17). The cytoplasm of the histiocytes frequently contains phagocytised lymphocytes and plasma cells, a finding known as emperipolesis in the histology of RDD (18). Since, extranodal RDD can be imperceptible and extranodal lesions typically have greater fibrosis, fewer RDD histiocytes, and less emperipolesis, emperipolesis is not necessary for the diagnosis (19). Histological analysis of the mass removed in this case revealed cells with emperipolesis combined with thick fibrotic regions, lymphoplasmacytic infiltration and aggregation, supporting RDD as the origin of the mass which is similar to findings of the cases reported by Raje P and Vyas P; Wang J et al., and Akyigit A et al., (2),(13),(14). Since, RDD’s course typically self-limits, close observation is the advised management strategy. Surgical excision is the most effective course of action when management is necessary, such as in lesions that are physically compressing surrounding tissue or in lesions that are affecting internal organs. Oral steroids should be started in cases of fever >38°C without a known illness and unexpected lymph node enlargement (17). Although, anecdotal reports of the use of corticosteroids, thalidomide, radiation and alkylating drugs exist, their efficacy has not been established (20). Various treatment approaches have been suggested for individuals based on prior case reports, including cryotherapy, surgical excision, irradiation, oral corticosteroids, dapsone, thalidomide and isotretinoin (21),(22).

In the case reported by Raje P and Vyas P, the mass was endoscopically excised (2), in the case presented by Akyigit A et al., the mass was excised surgically (14), and in the case presented by Wang J et al., most of the diseased tissue was excised for pathological examination (13). However, no further treatment was performed, for the patient’s personal reasons. Moreover, in the second postoperative year, the tumour grew back which was then surgically excised following which there was no recurrence. Similarly, the tumour in the patient’s case necessitated removal because it was blocking the patient’s airway and causing the nasal septum to deviate to the opposite side.

Conclusion

The RDD is a rare, benign proliferative disease mainly affecting the lymphatic tissues, however, the disease may manifest in extranodal sites, including the skin and the mucosal site. The present case discusses an Indo-asian patient with RDD of the nose without lymphadenopathy. Eventhough, most cases resolve on their own surgical excision is recommended for a larger tumour involving the airway which causes airway compromise just like in the present case. The appropriate management of RDD must be established by well-designed studies to draw firm conclusions.

References

1.
Mahzoni P, Zavareh MH, Bagheri M, Hani N, Moqtader B. Intracranial Rosai- Dorfman disease. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. 2012;17(3):304.
2.
Raje P, Vyas P. Extra nodal Rosai Dorfman disease of nasal septal mucosa without lymphadenopathy. Journal of Pathology of Nepal. 2016;6(11):968-70. [crossref]
3.
Kutlubay Z, Bairamov O, Sevim A, Demirkesen C, Mat MC. Rosai-Dorfman disease: A case report with nodal and cutaneous involvement and review of the literature. The American Journal of Dermatopathology. 2014;36(4):353-57. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Mosheimer BA, Oppl B, Zandieh S, Fillitz M, Keil F, Klaushofer K, et al. Bone involvement in Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD): A case report and systematic literature review. Current Rheumatology Reports. 2017;19(5):01-05. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Thawerani H, Sanchez RL, Rosai J, Dorfman RF. The cutaneous manifestations of sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. Archives of Dermatology. 1978;114(2):191-97. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Rosai J, Dorfman RF. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy: A pseudolymphomatous benign disorder. Analysis of 34 cases. Cancer. 1972;30(5):1174-88. 3.0.CO;2-S>[crossref][PubMed]
7.
Al-Khateeb TH. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease of the face: A comprehensive literature review and case report [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(3):528-40. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Vaiselbuh SR, Bryceson YT, Allen CE, Whitlock JA, Abla O. Updates on histiocytic disorders. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61:1329-35. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Kismet E, Koseoglu V, Atay AA, Deveci S, Demirkaya E, Tuncer K. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy in three brothers. Pediatr Int. 2005;47:473-76. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Elbaz Younes I, Sokol L, Zhang L. Rosai-dorfman disease between proliferation and neoplasia. Cancers. 2022;14(21):5271. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Wang KH, Chen WY, Liu HN, Huang CC, Lee WR, Hu CH. Cutaneous Rosai- Dorfman disease: Clinicopathological profiles, spectrum and evolution of 21 lesions in six patients. British Journal of Dermatology. 2006;154(2):277-86. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Brenn T, Calonje E, Granter SR, Leonard N, Grayson W, Fletcher CD, et al. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease is a distinct clinical entity. The American Journal of Dermatopathology. 2002;24(5):385-91. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Wang J, Wang Y, Li G, Wang C, Yu G, Sun Y. Rosai-Dorfman disease originating from nasal septal mucosa and presenting with nasal dorsum collapse: A case report with literature review. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal. 2022:01455613221079500. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Akyigit A, Akyol H, Sakallioglu O, Polat C, Keles E, Alatas O. Rosai-Dorfman disease originating from nasal septal mucosa. Case Reports in Otolaryngology. 2015;2015:232898. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Garcia RA, DiCarlo EF. Rosai-Dorfman disease of bone and soft tissue. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2022;146(1):40-46. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Bruce-Brand C, Schneider JW, Schubert P. Rosai-Dorfman disease: An overview. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2020;73(11):697-705. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Hinojosa T, Ramos E, Lewis DJ, del Angel L, Vangipuram R, Peranteau AJ, et al. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease: A separate clinical entity. Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery. 2017;21(2):107-09. [crossref]
18.
Haroche J, Cohen-Aubart F, Rollins BJ, Donadieu J, Charlotte F, Idbaih A, et al. Histiocytoses: Emerging neoplasia behind inflammation. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(2):e113-25. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Abla O, Jacobsen E, Picarsic J, Krenova Z, Jaffe R, Emile JF, et al. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and clinical management of Rosai-Dorfman- Destombes disease[J]. Blood. 2018;131(26):2877-90. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Pulsoni A, Anghel G, Falcucci P, Matera R, Pescarmona E, Ribersani M, et al. Treatment of sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): Report of a case and literature review. American Journal of Hematology. 2002;69(1):67-71. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Sun NZ, Galvin J, Cooper KD. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease was successfully treated with low-dose methotrexate. JAMA Dermatology. 2014;150(7):787-88. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Karami R, Ghieh F, Baroud J, Sittah GA. Rosai-Dorfman disease: Cutaneous and parotid involvement. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2019;82(6):639-41.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61588.17751

Date of Submission: Nov 23, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 11, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 22, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 07, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 12, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 07, 2023 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com