Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 47038

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : FC12 - FC16 Full Version

Effect of Azadirachta indica against Sodium Benzoate Induced Hepatorenal Toxicity in Wistar Rats- An Experimental Interventional Study


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59151.17866
Deepa Kameswari, Vignesh Ezhil, Varadharaja Perumal, M Manju, M Meganathan, K Madhanagopal

1. Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India. 2. Undergraduate Student, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Biochemistry, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India. 6. Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Deepa Kameswari,
Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Kirumambakkam-607402, Puducherry, India.
E-mail: docpdeepa@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Azadirachta indica (Neem) is one of the widely used plants which has various medicinal properties like antipyretic, antimicrobial, antitumour, anti-inflammatory, antiulcer and antidiabetic effects. Silymarin-a milk thistle derivative has its own clinical significance. Sodium Benzoate (SB) is a versatile food preservative used in packaged food and drink industries which is consumed by the people unknowingly above World Health Organisation (WHO) standards which causes potential cytotoxicity.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of Azadirachta indica leaf extract and the combination effect of Azadirachta indica leaf extract (Neem) with Silymarin against SB induced hepatorenal toxicity in adult male albino wistar rats.

Materials and Methods: This experimental interventional animal study was conducted at Central Animal House at Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India from July 2021 to August 2021 for a period of 14 days. Total 30 male wistar rats were randomised into five groups with six rats into each group. The groups were: group 1 Control received only distilled water, group 2 SB 200 mg/kg bw (SB) alone, group 3 SB+Silymarin 100 mg/kg bw, group 4 SB+ Azadirachta indica aqueous extract 400 mg/kg bw, group 5 SB+Silymarin 100 mg/kg bw+Azadirachta indica aqueous extract 400 mg/kg bw for 14 days through oral gavage. Doses and duration were determined based on previous studies. Blood was drawn from a retro-orbital puncture, animals were sacrificed by euthanasia, a part of liver and kidney samples were sent for histopathological examination-cell structure, integrity and inflammation. Biochemical parameters of liver function tests-Serum Alanine Transaminase (ALT), Serum Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) and Kidney function tests: urea, creatinine and uric acid were measured in serum. Statistical analysis was done by one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnet’s posthoc test used for intergroup comparison, p-value <0.05 considered to be significant.

Results: There was a significant increase in the activities of liver enzymes ALT, AST, ALP and kidney function (creatinine, uric acid) in the SB alone treated group when compared with the control group. Hepatorenal protection of neem extract was shown by significant decrease in liver and renal parameters which was comparable to that of control and Silymarin standard drug. Combination of silymarin and neem showed significant protection in liver (ALT, AST, ALP) and kidney function (urea, creatinine, uric acid) when compared to neem alone treated group. All the results were substantiated by histopathological examination of liver and kidney tissues.

Conclusion: This study suggests the effect of Azadirachta indica leaf extract with Silymarin possess hepatorenoprotective effect against SB induced damage in rats. Combination effect of Azadirachta indica leaf extract with Silymarin significantly proved the hepatorenal protectivity when compared with Neem alone treated group.

Keywords

Animal study, Food preservative, Hepatotoxicity, Neem, Silymarin

The rapid urbanisation of people from rural areas to urban areas and the growing size of middle-class population and the growing attitude to western lifestyle, technological breakthrough are the main factors in the growth of canned foods. India’s packaged food market size is estimated to reach 3.4 billion by 2027, growing at Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 4.6% during the forecast period of 2022-2027. Various food items like savoury snacks, breakfast cereals, processed meat, frozen sweet corn and readymade meals are readily available in retail stores in their packaged forms. By keeping the food fresh and intact, preservatives have to be added in addition to that it also prevents adulteration practices (1).

SB is a chemical preservative which inhibits the activity of microorganisms in very low concentration and has been generally recognised as safe food preservative (2). The current maximum usage level permitted is 0.1% in food (3). SB inhibits the growth of bacteria, yeast, and mould (4). SB in the mitochondria of liver cells is metabolised by binding to the amino acid glycine and excreted as hippuric acid from the urine. Glycine excretion from the body indicates impaired function of the liver in metabolic process in which glycine is essential. In addition, low glycine levels in the body can reduce creatinine levels, glutamate, urea and uric acid in the urine and increases the levels of these substances in the blood (5). Though SB is known for its detrimental effects on health, it cannot be completely neglected in this modern era. Hence, present study was done to study the effects of SB on organ dysfunction and how it can be attenuated by various drug therapies.

Several natural products like silymarin, grape fruit, spirulina etc., has been shown to have hepatoprotective effect against various toxicities (6). Silymarin obtained from Silybum marinum-A milk thistle seed, is one of the widely used drug which has antioxidant, immunomodulatory, antifibrotic, antiproliferative, and antiviral properties that protects the liver from the free radical damage produced by various drug toxicities (7),(8). Therefore, hepatoprotectives are being searched all over the world with greater efficacy and lesser side-effects which focuses mainly on plant based drugs.

Neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf extract is well-known for its medicinal purposes. Neem leaf extract is the most useful traditional medicine is a source of many therapeutic agents in the Indian culture and grows well in the tropical and semi-tropical countries (9). In indigenous system of medicine every part of neem tree is used as medicine. Its extracts have antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, antihelminthic, antidermatic, anti-inflammatory properties and immunomodulatory effects (10). These activities of neem are due to presence of compounds like nimbidin, sodium nimbidate, geduinin, nembolide, cyclic trisulphide, polysaccharides, polypeptidoglycans (11). There are several studies showing hepatorenal protectivity of Azadirachta indica leaf extract (12),(13), but the data is scarce or not adequate enough against its effect on SB induced changes in liver and kidney. So, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of Azadirachta indica leaf extract when administered alone and in combination with silymarin against SB induced hepatorenal toxicity in adult male albino wistar rats.

Material and Methods

This interventional experimental animal study was conducted in Central Animal House at Aarupadai Veedu Medical College, Puducherry from July 2021 to August 2021 for a period of 14 days. The study was carried out in accordance with established Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA) guidelines (14) on the care of laboratory animals following approval by the Institutional Animal Ethical committee.(Certificate attached AVMC/IAEC/2019/07/25/04).

Inclusion criteria: Healthy adult male albino wistar rats having 150-250 grams in weight were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Rats with any signs/symptoms of illness and female rats were excluded from the study.

Animals were acclimatised in the experiment room for a period of seven days before dosing. They were housed in polypropylene cages with ad libitum pellet feed and filtered drinking water. The environment was maintained at a temperature of 25±2° Celsius with Relative Humidity around 45-55%. The noise levels were below 80 decibels and light intensity around 160-200 lux and grouping of animals were assigned by simple random sampling method to five groups (six animals in each group) total 30 rats, using the online GraphPad random number generator (15) and the sample size of 30 animals were calculated using G Power version 3.1 software with an effect of 1, level of significance at 5% and 90% power (16):

Group 1-Control, received distilled water.
Group 2-Sodium Benzoate (SB) 200 mg/kg bw (SB) alone,
Group 3-SB+Silymarin 100 mg/kg bw,
Group 4-SB+Azadirachta indica aqueous extract 400 mg/kg bw,
Group 5-SB+Silymarin 100 mg/kg bw+Azadirachta indica aqueous extract 400 mg/kg bw. All drugs were administered orally for 14 days through oral gavage.

Study Procedure

Urea, Uric acid, Creatinine and enzyme diagnostic kits (ALT, AST, ALP) were obtained from JEEV Diagnostic Pvt. Ltd., Puducherry, India. Standard procedure as specified in the kit literature was followed-Serum ALT (International Federation of Clinical Chemistry method, without Pyridoxal Phosphate activation), Serum AST (IFCC method, without PLP activation), Serum ALP (IFCC method, with PLP activation), Serum Albumin (Bromocresol green method), Serum Protein (Biuret method), Serum Urea (Urease Glutamate Dehydrogenase, Ultraviolet (UV) method), Serum Creatinine (Sarcosine Oxidase method), Serum Uric acid (Uricase-peroxidase method). SB and Silymarin both were obtained from Subra Scientifics, Puducherry, India.

Fresh samples of Azadirachta indica (Neem) leaves were collected at farm settlement, at Puducherry, India. The plant was identified at Department of Botany, Department of Biological Science, 13Pondicherry University. The leaves of Azadirachta indica 500 g were air dried to constant weight at room temperature after which they were pulverised. The leaf powder was homogenised in six volumes of 80% methanol for 72 hours after which it was filtered through Whatman No.1 Filter paper (17). The crude extract was recovered following removal of solvent on a water bath. The concentrated extract was allowed to dry at room temperature after which serial dilution of extract was prepared.

Phytochemical screening: Phytochemical tests were carried out on the aqueous extracts of the sample using standard procedures (18). Phytochemical screening not only helps to reveal the constituents of plants but also helps in searching for the bioactive agents which can be used for the synthesis of useful drugs (19).

Experimental animals: Male albino wistar rats free of specific pathogens were purchased from Biogen Attibele, Bangalore, India and kept in the Central animal house of Aarupadai Veedu Medical College. Rats were 8-12 weeks of age with the body weight of ranging from 150-250 gm. The rats were kept in ventilated cage at optimum temperature 25±2ºC and 12 hour light/dark cycle and fed with rat pellet and water ad libitum.

All the drugs and chemicals were given orally once daily for all groups throughout the 14 days duration of study based on the body weight of each rat. Hence, it is a subacute toxicity study and the duration and dosage of this experiment is based on the previous study (20). Average body weight of each group was taken recorded daily and administration of drugs were done using oral gavage.

Preparation of biochemical parameters and histopathology of liver and kidney of rats: After 14 days of administration of drugs in the rats, blood samples and part of liver and kidney tissues were taken on 15th day. Blood samples were collected at retro-orbital sinus of rats and sent for biochemical parameters such as liver and kidney function tests. Rats were then euthanised in CO2 chamber and a part of liver and kidney were removed from each rat, washed with normal saline and preserved in 10% formalin in separately labelled specimen collection jars and sent for histopathological examination. After one week, liver and renal tissues were dehydrated with a sequence of ethanol solutions, embedded in paraffin, cut into 5 μm section, stained with haematoxylin-eosin dye and then observed under photomicroscope at different magnifications (10x, 40x, 100x). Appreciable changes were noted and subjective grading (20) was done by the pathologist based on a standard classification.

Statistical Analysis

Data was entered and analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Software (v21.0) by one-way ANOVA and results were expressed as mean±Standard Deviation (SD). Significance of difference between groups were further analysed with Dunnett’s test for posthoc comparisons. The p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Body weight: The body weight of the standard drug group (SB+Neem) at the start (198.67±10.89) and end of the experiment (223.8±14.30) shows that there was no significant changes in body weight. This shows that there was no statistically significant (p-value-0.543 and 0.072) difference in body weight of rats at the start and end of the experiment. Hence, it was also observed body weight does not show any changes in accordance to SB toxicity and treatment groups (Azadirachta indica aqueous leaf extract and Silymarin) (Table/Fig 1).

Effect of Azadirachta indica on liver enzymes: The present study shows that there was a significant rise in serum liver enzymes in SB treated group, proving that SB has the capability to produce toxicity. While, giving SB with Silymarin and SB with neem leaf extract, Silymarin treated group has slight significant decrease of ALT, AST, ALP when compared with Neem leaf extract. Comparing the Silymarin alone and Neem leaf extract alone treated group with the combinedly given group shows a significant decrease of liver enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP) proves the combination effect works well. There were no significant changes in serum albumin and total protein (p-values=0.5 for serum albumin and 0.1 for total proteins) in the total experiment. Combination effect of neem leaf extract with Silymarin gives better results in decreasing the liver enzymes when compared with other treatment groups (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3).

Effect of Azadirachta indica on renal functions: Present study showed that SB also have had an effect on renal functions by increasing the serum levels of urea, creatinine and uric acid levels which shows to be SB causes nephrotoxicity. In the treatment groups neem leaf extract has slight better effect when comparing with Silymarin while comparing the urea alone. But there was some slight difference noted in creatinine and uric acid levels. It shows that neem leaf extract and Silymarin has same effect on reducing creatinine and urea levels. Combination effect of neem leaf extract with Silymarin gives better results when compared with other treatment groups (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5).

Histopathological results: Histopathological examination reveals appreciable changes were noted in liver and kidney tissues. Liver showed inflammation, necrosis, severity of hepatitis and regenerative changes. Kidney shows changes in glomeruli and loss of proximal convoluted tubule integrity. It was based on the subjective grading by pathologist as mentioned in the previous study (Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9) (20).

Discussion

Liver disorders like jaundice, acute and chronic hepatitis, degenerative disorders and hepatotoxicity are still without permanent curable treatment modalities. Many drugs and chemicals can injure the liver (21) and the severity of damage depends on both the dose and duration of exposure of the toxin. Elevated liver enzymes along with jaundice are associated with increased mortality and need for liver transplant (22). Food preservatives like SB which are consumed regularly causes major liver dysfunction where medicinal plants come in rescue to counter the toxicity due to such insults. Neem is one of those candidate plants and the components of the neem tree, like bark, seed, leaf, fruit, gum, oil contain substances offering some impressive therapeutic applications. However, there has always been a need for more studies that can provide a clear picture for the effect of these herbs against various toxicities.

In the present study, the significant change in liver enzymes such as ALT, AST, ALP observed in the rats due to administration of SB shows toxicity has been produced by elevating these enzymes levels. Studies have shown that high level of serum ALT, AST, ALP can result in liver damage (23). This is because of the SB intoxication results in leakage of cytosolic enzymes into the blood stream due to lipid peroxidation and can damage the cellular membrane (24). Serum ALT and AST levels determines to be used in large assessment of liver damage. SB causes damage to the hepatocyte (the liver cell) and the crista in the mitochondria can be lost due to the toxicity, leading to cytoplasmic cell injury and cell death [25,26]. In the present study, there was no change in albumin and total protein levels which was measured in all the groups of rats which goes in concordance with a previous study (27). This clearly shows that toxicity is not enough to alter the protein synthesis in the liver.

Renal enzymes such as urea, creatinine and uric acid are known to have significant raise in their levels showing against when SB is administered. SB alone has the capacity to induce Proximal tubular, glomeruli damages and can cause necrosis, in severe case it can be leading to congestion and calcification (28). This shows that kidney function has been lost because kidneys are the mainstay in clearance mechanism and can clear the waste products. Urea, uric acid and creatinine are known to be the waste products of metabolism. This had showed that significant raise in blood stream indicates that kidneys had impaired clearance mechanism and there is a defective in the kidney function. This study shows that SB has the tendency to produce toxicity in liver and kidney when administered in the given dose which goes concordance with a previous study (29).

SB has rapid absorption and metabolism as well as quick excretion of metabolites in the body. So, no weight changes are known to be noted. Benzoate conversion to Hippurate occurs within the mitochondrial matrix in two steps. Benzoate enters the mitochondria and is converted to benzoyl CoA (reaction 1) by an ATP-dependent acid: CoA ligase. Benzoyl CoA is subsequently converted to Hippurate (reaction 2) by glycine N-acyltransferase, and then exits the mitochondria. Studies have shown that body weight was altered while giving SB in different dosages (30). In this study, there was no significant change in body weight was noted which was similar to that of a previous study (31). It shows that SB has the property of altering body weight only when given in particular dose and duration.

Azadirachta indica (Neem) leaf extract which shows a protective agent against SB induced liver and kidney toxication in the present study which could be due to protective components of the neem like nimbin, nimbidin, azadirichtin, and limonoids. The hepatoprotective activity of neem leaf extract acts by inhibiting the aromatase activity of cytochrome p450 thereby favouring liver regeneration. Neem leaf extract also have antioxidant property and free radical scavenging capacity; thus by stopping the liver damage and favours of liver regeneration (32). This study shows that SB treated with neem has shows significant reduction in liver and renal enzymes favouring hepatocyte regeneration which is similar to a previous study (33).

This study finding also reveals that silymarin protectivity plays a role in regeneration of hepatocyte favouring hepato protectivity. Silymarin has the capacity of control of free radicals. The free radicals thus causing damages to the cellular membranes and cause lipoperoxidation (34). The protective effect of silymarin is the inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase cycle, production of free radicals and leukotrienes. Thus, silymarin protects by increasing hepatic protein synthesis. Also, helps in the stimulation of ribosomal RNA polymerase and subsequent protein synthesis, leading to enhanced hepatocyte regeneration (35).

So, combination of Azadirachta indica (Neem) leaf extract with Silymarin shows beneficial effects in treating SB induced hepatorenal toxicity in wistar rats when compared to their individual drug administration as described in their individual previous studies [36,37]. Clinically, it signifies that it will improve the patient healthcare as the liver is one of the vital organs, plays a role in detoxification, hence, it will helps in liver related diseases such as liver cirrhosis, hepatitis, non alcoholic fatty liver disease, and kidney related diseases such as glomerulonephritis, urinary tract infections, chronic kidney disease.

Limitation(s)

This study should be done for a longer duration with different dosage levels in other animal species with a larger sample size to know the efficacy of drugs. If proven, this can be given as a safe herbal supplement for all hepatic and renal dysfunction patients.

Conclusion

In summary, findings from the present study suggest that Azadirachta indica leaf extract at 400 mg/kg bw displays remarkable hepatoprotective effect against SB induced toxicity in experimental rats, possibly because of the presence of bioactive compounds which reduce oxidative stress by scavenging toxic radicals. Findings of the present study also suggest that Azadirachta indica leaf extract with silymarin has more beneficial effects against SB induced hepatorenal toxicity. However, more detailed studies are still required to establish the safety, efficacy, and active constituents of this plant to achieve better outcomes in clinical treatments.

References

1.
India Packaged Food Market by type (baby food, frozen processed food, ready meals, bakery, confectionery, meat, dairy products, and others), by distribution channel (offline (supermarkets, hypermarkets, convenience stores, brick-&- mortar, and others) and E-commerce)-global opportunity analysis and industry forecast, 2022-2027.
2.
Mehdi L, Hasson A. Estimate levels of the liver enzymes and serotonin immune localization in the brain of rats administrated orally with sodium benzoate. Int J of Pharm Research. 2020;12(4):2751-60. [crossref]
3.
Gaur H, Purushothaman S, Pullaguri N, Bhargava Y, Bhargava A. Sodium benzoate induced developmental defects, oxidative stress and anxiety-like behaviour in zebrafish larva. Biochem Biophys Res Commun [Internet]. 2018;502(3):364-69. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Saatci C, Erdem Y, Bayramov R, Akalin H, Tascioglu N, Ozkul Y. Effect of sodium benzoate on DNA breakage, micronucleus formation and mitotic index in peripheral blood of pregnant rats and their newborns. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment. 2016;30(6):1179-83. [crossref]
5.
Shahmohammadi M, Javadi M, Nassiri-Asl M. An overview on the effects of sodium benzoate as a preservative in food products. Biotechnol Health Sci. 2016;3(3):e35084. [crossref]
6.
Madrigal-Santillán E, Madrigal-Bujaidar E, Ãlvarez-González I, Sumaya-Martínez MT, Gutiérrez-Salinas J, Bautista M, et al. Review of natural products with hepatoprotective effects. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(40):14787-804. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Freitag AF, Cardia GFE, da Rocha BA, Aguiar RP, Silva-Comar FM de S, Spironello RA, et al. Hepatoprotective effect of Silymarin (Silybum marianum) on hepatotoxicity induced by acetaminophen in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:538317. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Vargas-Mendoza N, Madrigal-Santillan E, Morales-González A, Esquivel-Soto J, Esquivel-Chirino C, García-Luna Y, et al. Hepatoprotective effect of silymarin. World J Hepatol. 2014;6(3):144-49. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Sharma V, Jakhar KK, Nehra V, Kumar S. Biochemical studies in experimentally Escherichia coli infected broiler chicken supplemented with neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf extract. Vet World. 2015;8(11):1340-45. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Bijauliya RK, Alok S, Chanchal DK, Sabharwal M, Yadav RD. An updated review of pharmacological studies on Azadirachta indica (neem). Int J Pharm Sci and Res. 2018;9(7):2645-55.
11.
Monem MO. Biochemical and immunomorphometric comparative study using neem and propolis extracts for hepatorenal protection in rats. Der Pharma Chemica. 2018;10:116-27.
12.
Baligar NS, Aladakatti RH, Ahmed M, Hiremath M. Evaluation of acute toxicity of neem active constituent, nimbolide and its hepatoprotective activity against acute dose of carbon tetrachloride treated albino rats. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2014;5:3455-66.
13.
Gomase PV, Vinod D. Phytochemical evaluation and hepatoprotective activity of fresh juice of young stem (tender) bark of azadirachta indica a. Juss International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011;3(2):55-59.
14.
Care V. CPCSEA guidelines for laboratory animal facility. Indian J Pharmacol. 2003;35:257-74.
15.
Suresh KP. An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2011;4(1):08-11. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kang H. Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. J Educ Eval Health Prof [Internet]. 2021;18:17. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Oyewole O. Sodium benzoate mediated hepatorenal toxicity in wistar rat: Modulatory effects of Azadirachta indica (Neem) leaf. European J Med Plants. 2012;2(1):11-18. [crossref]
18.
Raphael E. Phytochemical constituents of some leaves extract of aloe vera and Azadirachta indica plant species. Global Advanced Research Journal of Environmental Science and Toxicology. 2012;1(2):14-17.
19.
Pant DR, Pant ND, Saru DB, Yadav UN, Khanal DP. Phytochemical screening and study of antioxidant, antimicrobial, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of extracts from stem wood of Pterocarpus marsupium Roxburgh. J Intercult Ethnopharmacol. 2017;6(2):170-76. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, Callea F, De Groote J, Gudat F, et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol [Internet]. 1995;22(6):696-99. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Khiewkhern S, Ruetrakul J, Thongkum W, Areeruk N. Factors enhancing drug- induced hepatotoxicity among Thai patients with TB. J Clin of Diagn Res. 2020;14(9):LC10-LC14. [crossref]
22.
Govindaraju P, Chandrasekaran S, Govindaraj N. Effect of hydroalcoholic root extract of aerva lanata on acetaminophen induced hepatotoxicity in wistar rats. J Clin Diagn Res. 2021;15(9):01-05. [crossref]
23.
Nawras A, Alwan AM, Al-Masoudi EA. The toxic effect of oral gavaged of Sodium Benzoate (SB) on adult male rabbits Mal. J Med Health Sci. 2022;18:64-69.
24.
Oladele JO, Oladele OT, Ademiluyi AO. (Jatropha tanjorensis) leafs protect against sodium benzoate mediated renal dysfunction and hepatic damage in rats. Clin Phytosci. 2020;6:13. [crossref]
25.
Hasson AM, Majhwol EM, Almuoswi HJN. Evaluation of some kidney functions of rates treated with sodium benzoate. Annals of RSCB. 2021;25(1):4859-66.
26.
Iroanya OO, Adebesin OA, Okpuzor J. Evaluation of the hepato and nephron- protective effect of a polyherbal mixture using wistar albino rats. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(6):HC15-HC21. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Smith JE, Lunn PG. Albumin-synthesizing capacity of hepatocytes isolated from rats fed diets differing in protein and energy content. Ann Nutr Metab.1984;28(5):281-87. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Rashedinia M, Khodaei F, Kholghipour H, Hosseinzadeh M. Effect of sodium benzoate on liver and kidney lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes in mice. J Rep Pharm Sci [Internet]. 2019;8(2):217. [crossref]
29.
Vinay AK, Abbas JC. Robbins Basic Pathology. Robbins Pathology. 2017.
30.
Khan IS, Dar KB, Ganie SA, Ali MN. Toxicological impact of sodium benzoate on inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress and biochemical markers in male Wistar rats. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2022;45(3):1345-54. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Lennerz BS, Vafai SB, Delaney NF, Clish CB, Deik AA, Pierce KA, et al. Effects of sodium benzoate, a widely used food preservative, on glucose homeostasis and metabolic profiles in humans. Mol Genet Metab. 2015;114(1):73-79. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Schmutterer H. The neem tree, source of unique natural products for integrated pest management. In: Medicine industry and other purposes. Pp. 68-76.
33.
Jerobin J, Makwana P, Suresh Kumar RS, Sundaramoorthy R, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N. Antibacterial activity of neem nanoemulsion and its toxicity assessment on human lymphocytes in vitro. Int J Nanomedicine [Internet]. 2015;10 Suppl 1:77-86. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Mukhtar S, Xiaoxiong Z, Qamer S, Saad M, Mubarik MS, Mahmoud AH, et al. Hepatoprotective activity of silymarin encapsulation against hepatic damage in albino rats. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(1):717-23. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Das S, Sharma G. Hepatoprotective activity of Aqueous Extract of Fruit Pulp of Cassia Fistula (AFCF) against Carbon Tetrachloride (CCL4) induced liver damage in albino rats. J Clin Diagn Res. 2008;2(5):1133-38.
36.
Sonnenbichler J, Zetl I. Biochemical effects of the flavonolignane silibinin on RNA, protein and DNA synthesis in rat livers. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1986;213:319-31.
37.
Baligar NS, Aladakatti RH, Ahmed M, Hiremath MB. Hepatoprotective activity of the neem-based constituent Azadirachtin-A in carbon tetrachloride intoxicated Wistar rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol [Internet]. 2014;92(4):267-77.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59151.17866

Date of Submission: Jul 19, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Oct 10, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 27, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 20, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 08, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jan 25, 2023 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com