Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 27349

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : ER01 - ER05 Full Version

Granulomatous Mastitis Masquerading as Breast Neoplasms- An Enigmatic Series of 14 Cases


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61735.17730
Meghadipa Mandal, Anadi Roy Chowdhury

1. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, Jhargram Government Medical College and Hospital, Jhargram, West Bengal, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Murshidabad Medical College and Hospital, Berhampore, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Meghadipa Mandal,
AC1, AA1, Farsight Housing Coopsoclimited, New Town, Rajarhat, North 24 Parganas, Kolkata-700156, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: meghadipa.mandal41@gmail.com

Abstract

Granulomatous Mastitis (GM) is a rare entity encountered in day-to-day practice. Aetiologies range from infections like tuberculosis, lactation, certain medications to being idiopathic. Clinical and radiological pictures in these cases often mimic breast carcinoma that poses diagnostic dilemmas to the treating physician. However, sometimes they may be asymptomatic. Definitive diagnosis is made using cytology followed by histomorphology by demonstration of granulomas, which are collections of histiocytes along with giant cells and inflammatory cells. Ancillary studies like Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) stain, Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) stain, Cartridge Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (CBNAAT) are used to detect or rule out certain aetiologies of granulomatous inflammation. Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis (IGM) is mainly a diagnosis of exclusion, where all the possible aetiologies have been ruled out by detailed history and investigations. Treatment approaches are mainly conservative, depending on the cause or may be anti-inflammatory and steroids in case of IGM. Appropriate and timed diagnosis of such cases is essential to prevent over diagnosis of carcinoma and unnecessary mastectomies. This is a series of 14 such cases which were diagnosed using cytology or histology and ancillary tools. They belonged to four categories (namely-Tuberculous mastitis, IGM, Post-chemotherapy GM and sarcoid granuloma of breast). Tuberculous cases shared majority of the series, whereas, sarcoid granuloma was a single isolated entity. All these cases presented with lump in breast with other associated presentations. Immediate tissue diagnosis helped in ruling out malignancy and adopting a conservative approach for management.

Keywords

Adjuvant chemotherapy, Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis, Sarcoidosis, Tuberculosis

The granulomatous mastitis is an uncommon group of chronic inflammatory breast disorders (1) that can mimic breast neoplasms or infectious mastitis, both clinically and radiologically (2). The aetiopathogenesis is vastly idiopathic with possible roles of trauma, hormonal effect, metabolic process, previous therapy-related changes or even infections (3), tuberculosis being an important aetiology behind this entity in Indian subcontinent. There additionally seems to be geographic and ethnic variance in the prevalence, where Caucasian and African American population appear to be less affected. Some unidentified infectious trigger or genetic predisposition may be the reason behind this diversity (4). Local autoimmune disease, involving humoral and cell-mediated immunity appears to be another interesting proposed pathogenic mechanism behind this entity (5). There is lack of any consensus on management in the literature due to rarity of this condition (6).

The symptoms of GM tend to overlap with more malicious entities, particularly breast carcinoma. However, it may also be asymptomatic (7). GM cases usually presents with lump with or without the features of inflammation. Associated axillary lymphadenopathy may further increase the clinical suspicion of a neoplastic process, especially in the setting of older age group. Discharging sinuses or abscess formation may be occasionally seen in tubercular cases (8). IGM cases also typically presents with unilateral or bilateral tender firm breast masses along with erythema, pain, and drainage, despite not being associated with any infective or neoplastic process (9). All the GM cases were studied for total duration of six months with respect to their clinical presentation, demographic characteristics and ancillary investigations in support of their diagnosis. The findings are demonstrated in this paper.

Case Report

All the histomorphologically and cytologically proven cases of GM cases during the period of six months (March, 2022-August, 2022) were included in this series. Total number of such cases was 14. They were analysed based on their age of presentation, presenting complaints, clinical findings and significant past history (with respect to any Anti-tubercular Therapy, adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy, etc.,). Ancillary studies like Ziehl-Neelsen stain, CBNAAT, etc., were carried out to confirm certain aetiologies.

Tuberculous Mastitis

This accounted for a total number of eight cases. These included women of child-bearing age to post-menopausal age group. They had varied clinical presentation, lump being the most common one, present in all eight cases. Systemic symptoms like fever, weight loss were present in six cases. Two cases had nipple discharge as well. Clinically, peau d’ orange change over the skin was seen two cases of elderly population, giving a false impression of malignancy. Four cases had a past history of Anti-tubercular Drug (ATD) intake for pulmonary tuberculosis, more than five years back. Ultrasound examination of the breast masses were scored as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 2 and 3 in six cases, whereas BI-RADS 4 in two cases.

All these cases showed well-defined epithelioid granulomas along with Langhans giant cells either in histology sections (Table/Fig 1) or cytology smears. Definite caseation necrosis was also present in few cases. Three cases showed Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) in ZN stain (Table/Fig 2) whereas five cases showed positive CBNAAT results. All these cases on follow-up for six months showed signs of remission after starting ATDs.

Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis (IGM)

This was diagnosed in three cases of the series. Their ages were 26 years, 38 years and 41 years, respectively. All of them presented with painless lump in breast. On palpation, the lump was firm, immobile with no axillary lymphadenopathy. There was history of lactation in one case and Oral Contraceptive Pill (OCP) intake in two cases. Ultrasonography (USG) examination showed Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System 3 (BI-RADS) in two cases and BI-RADS 4 in one case.

Cytology smears showed non caseating granulomas with foreign body giant cells in two cases, whereas, there were few atypical epithelial cells in the elderly patient. The latter was followed by tru-cut biopsy that showed granulomatous inflammation with foreign body giant cell reaction (Table/Fig 3). No necrosis or malignancy was visualised in the sections. Ancillary investigations like ZN stain, CBNAAT turned out negative. PAS stain was also done, but failed to demonstrate any fungal bodies. No definite aetiology was identified in these cases. All these cases were treated with anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids and on follow-up for six months, showed partial remission of symptoms.

Post-chemotherapy Granulomatous Mastitis (GM)

This was seen in two cases aged 48 years and 56 years, respectively. Both had breast conservation surgeries followed by chemotherapy and presently complained with lump in the breast. There was clinical suspicion of recurrence of malignancy and hence, tru-cut biopsy was performed. Breast imaging studies were not available for these cases.

One case revealed suture granuloma. Another case showed post-chemotherapy changes like fibrosis, histiocytes, inflammatory cells and ill-defined granulomas (Table/Fig 4). There was no atypical/malignant cells visualised in both the cases. Both the cases on six months follow-up were doing well with no evidence of recurrence.

Sarcoid Granuloma

There was a single case of sarcoidosis of breast in a 35-year-old female patient. She presented with firm lump in breast along with unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy. USG showed a BI-RADS score of 3. Cytology as well as histopathology from the breast lump showed classical non caseating granulomas. Similar picture was also seen in enlarged axillary nodes (Table/Fig 5). Ancillary investigations like ZN stain, CBNAAT, PAS stain turned out negative. With the suspicion of sarcoidosis in mind, detailed history revealed long standing cough with fatigue and weight loss for last eight to nine months. Plain chest X-ray turned out normal, whereas focal reticulo-nodular opacities were seen in CT scan. In the two months follow-up, the patient was currently being treated with corticosteroids, showing signs of response. The following table summarises the above findings (Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

The granulomatous mastitis is a rare non neoplastic entity of uncertain incidence (10). It has been estimated that between 0.44 and 1.6% of all breast biopsy specimens are reported as GM (11). The aetiopathogenesis of GM may remain unknown with no identifiable causative factor or may have an autoimmune reaction to mammary duct protein secretions secondary to trauma, infection or chemical irritation (12). Tuberculous mastitis, although rare, may contribute to a significant proportion of cases in endemic areas (13), as was seen in this series. Breastfeeding, smoking, and use of the OCP have also been reported to be correlated with GM (14),(15). These associations, i.e., lactation and OCP intake were also seen in this study population.

Although rare, the reporting pathologist and treating physician must be well versed with this entity as they mimic neoplasm as was seen in all the patients in this case series, that presented with breast lump. Skin changes like peau d’ orange appearance or axillary lymphadenopathy are less common presentations (16) seen in some tuberculous or sarcoid aetiologies in this series. Systemic symptoms such as fever, chills, and fatigue are unusual (17), as was limited to tuberculous mastitis amongst this study population. In a relatively large series of 25 patients, the mean age at presentation was found to be 36.5 years, mainly pertaining to child-bearing age group (18). However, in this series, the age ranges varied depending on the cause of granulomatous reaction in breast. The mean age of this series was 44 years (range: 20-62 years).

Imaging in the form of USG study was available in six out of eight cases and BI-RADS scoring were given. Three cases (50%) were suspicious of malignancy with a BI-RADS 4, whereas 3 (50%) were BI-RADS 2 and 3 (Benign and possibly benign, respectively). Such radiologic overlap with breast carcinoma has also been demonstrated in other study populations (19). The diagnosis was based on cytology and/or histology with formation of granulomas with associated features depending on cause of the inflammatory process. Biopsy is the gold standard in making a diagnosis in these cases. Ancillary tests like ZN stain, CBNAAT, PAS stains were performed to confirm tuberculous or fungal aetiologies, as well as, to exclude these causative factors to make a diagnosis of IGM. It is mainly a diagnosis of exclusion as was followed in other case series as well (20). Granulomatous reaction following breast conserving surgeries and adjuvant therapy in cancer survivors is rare with few case series depicting the same (21). This was seen in two cases of this study population that initially raised concern amongst the clinician with suspicion of recurrence/relapse of malignancy.

Tuberculosis is a chronic granulomatous inflammation, with Mycobacterium tuberculosis as its main causative agent. It is one of the most widespread human infections in the world with re-emergence in developed countries due to increase in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infections and increasing immigrations (13). Breast tissue has natural resistance to multiplication of tubercle bacilli, thereby making breast involvement a rare entity even in endemic countries (22). The clinical and imaging characteristics are vastly non specific, combined with lack of familiarity of the clinicians that have increased rates of misdiagnosis of these cases as breast cancers or pyogenic breast abscess (23). The pauci-bacillary nature of these cases further complicates the diagnosis (24). Tuberculous mastitis can be secondary to primary infection elsewhere or direct inoculation of bacilli via lactiferous ducts or even through direct extension from chest wall. The clinical presentation of tuberculous mastitis spans around a wide spectrum of solitary or multiple breast masses, abscesses, sinus tracts, skin ulcers, or skin thickening some of which are seen in this series like breast mass, peau d’ orange-like skin changes, as has already been discussed before. Timely and accurate diagnosis of tuberculous mastitis cases require physician’s knowledge about these varied presentations and hence, raise a clinical suspicion (13). Core biopsy followed by histopathology is the gold standard for confirming or ruling out the diagnosis, especially in endemic zones (25). IGM is yet another mysterious illness with its first report in 1972 by Kessler E and Wolloch Y (26). With a reported incidence of 2.4 cases per 100,000 women aged 20-40 years in the US (27), it is predominantly seen to affect women of childbearing age, with rare instances in men and elderly women (28). There are multi-factorial propositions behind its pathogenesis, as has already been discussed, none of which has been conclusively proven. Like Tuberculous mastitis, similarity to the clinical presentation of breast cancer, along with inconclusive imaging modalities often lead to misdiagnosis as cancer, delayed diagnosis and misguided therapies (29). Adequate knowledge and awareness amongst the physician will be helpful as these are diagnosed only based on high degrees of suspicion and after exclusion of all possible causes of granulomatous inflammation in breast.

Post-chemotherapy GM is a very rare entity with only few supporting case series and reports available in literature as already discussed previously. This is extremely important from treatment point of view, as recurrence of breast cancer is the first most important differential that needs to be ruled out (21), that will lead to paradigm shift in therapeutic management of these cases. However, post-treatment malignancy rate is low, recorded to be as low as 6.1% in follow-up in a study by Laws A et al., (30). Thus, histopathological confirmation of such cases may prevent unnecessary surgeries in many cases.

Sarcoidosis is originally described as idiopathic systemic inflammatory granulomatous disorder comprising epithelioid and multinucleated giant cells with little or no necrosis. It is multisystemic with common involvement of lungs with fibrosis, along with lymph nodes, skin, liver, spleen, eyes, phalangeal bones, parotid glands and very rarely breast (31). When such breast lumps are found, they are clinically suspected as breast malignancy due to associated axillary lymphadenopathy, in a set up of sarcoidosis. This case of the series was unique as breast lump was the initial presenting complaint with subsequent investigations, further detailed history and ancillary studies helped in making a diagnosis of Sarcoidosis. Although rare, but sarcoidosis should also be considered as one differential in granulomatous inflammation of breast, where it can either be primarily or secondarily involved (32).

All these cases were treated depending on their diagnosis. There is no definite treatment protocol for IGM, the therapeutic arsenal varying from broad spectrum antibiotics usually associated with corticosteroid therapy to shrink the mass before a lumpectomy to a radical mastectomy is planned depending on the severity and extension of the lesions and the efficiency of medical treatment (33). Corticosteroids were sufficient in this study population with patients showing signs of remission and recovery in follow-up period. A more comprehensive literature review in the last five years was made and the findings have been tabulated (Table/Fig 7) (5),(9),(13),(21),(34),(35),(36),(37),(38),(39).

Conclusion

The GM is a rare but benign and non neoplastic entity among all cases of breast biopsy specimens with lack of awareness and paucity of literature in this field. However, it must be properly diagnosed to avoid unnecessary mastectomies, due to a greater clinical and radiologic overlap with malignant lesions of breast. Certain ancillary investigations are helpful to confirm/exclude certain causative factors for the same. Although definite and standardised therapeutic norms are not available, corticosteroids have shown promising results in a large number of cases.

Acknowledgement

I would sincerely like to thank all the co-authors for their intellectual contributions towards completion of this paper. They have not produced this work in any form on any other platform and have committed to the submission of this case series for publication in this journal.

References

1.
Afridi SP, Memon A, Shafiq-ur-Rahman, Memon A. Granulomatous mastitis: A case series. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010;20(10):706.
2.
Ahmed R, Sultan F. Granulomatous mastitis: A review of 14 cases. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2006;18(1):52-54.
3.
Wolfrum A, Kümmel S, Theuerkauf I, Pelz E, Reinisch M. Granulomatous mastitis: A therapeutic and diagnostic challenge. Breast Care (Basel). 2018;13(6):413-18. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Davis J, Cocco D, Matz S, Hsu CH, Brown MJ, Lee J, et al. Re-evaluating if observation continues to be the best management of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis. Surgery. 2019;166(6):1176-80. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Deng JQ, Yu L, Yang Y. Steroids administered after vacuum-assisted biopsy in the management of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis. J Clin Pathol. 2017;70(10):827-31. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Freeman M, Lewis CD, Lower E. Refractory granulomas of breast: Benign or malignant disease. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(suppl):21. [crossref]
7.
Severs FJ, Guevara L, Sam KQ, Roark A, Benveniste AP, Ebuoma L. Granulomatous mastitis of the breast: A malicious mimic. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography. 2018;34(3):223-28. [crossref]
8.
Jalali U, Rasul S, Khan A, Baig N, Khan A, Akhter R. Tuberculous mastitis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005;15(4):234-37.
9.
Ringsted S, Friedman M. A rheumatologic approach to granulomatous mastitis: A case series and review of the literature. Int J Rheum Dis. 2021;24(4):526-32. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Babahabib A, Arsalane A, Aitelfadl F, Chahdi H. Granulomatous mastitis-a case report. Integr J Med Sci. 2018;5(r):01-03. [crossref]
11.
Elsiddig KE, Khalil EA, Elhag IA. Granulomatous mammary disease: Ten years’ experience with needle aspiration cytology. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2003;7(4):365-69.
12.
Benson JR, Dumitru D. Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: Presentation, investigation and management. Future Oncol. 2016;12(11):1381-94. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Farrokh D, Alamdaran A, FeyziLaeen A, FallahRastegar Y, Abbasi B. Tuberculous mastitis: A review of 32 cases. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;87:135-42. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Barreto DS, Sedgwick EL, Nagi CS, Benveniste AP. Granulomatous mastitis: Etiology, imaging, pathology, treatment, and clinical findings. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;171(3):527-34. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Bani-Hani KE, Yaghan RJ, Matalka II, Shatnawi NJ. Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: Time to avoid unnecessary mastectomies. Breast J. 2004;10(4):318-22. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Sam KQ, Severs FJ, Ebuoma LO, Chandandeep NS, Sedgwick EL. Granulomatous mastitis in a transgender patient. J Radiol Case Rep. 2017;11(2):16-22. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Al-Khawari HA, Al-Manfouhi HA, Madda JP. Radiologic features of granulomatous mastitis. Breast J. 2011;17(6):645-50. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Azlina AF, Ariza Z, Arni T, Hisham AN. Chronic granulomatous mastitis: Diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. World J Surg. 2003; 27:515-18. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Sripathi S, Ayachit A, Bala A, Kadavigere R, Kumar S. Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: A diagnostic dilemma for the breast radiologist. Insights Imaging. 2016;7(4):523-29. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Varshochi M, Haghdoost M, Mashrabi O. Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: A case report. Am J Infect Dis. 2010;6(3):61-65. [crossref]
21.
Ichinose Y, Kosaka Y, Saeki T. Granuloma after breast conserving surgery-a report of three cases. J Surg Case Rep. 2021;2021(6):01-04. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Gon S, Bhattacharyya A, Majumdar B, Kundu S. Tubercular mastitis-a great masquerader. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2013;29:61-63. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Madhusudhan KS, Gamanagatti S. Primary breast tuberculosis masquerading as carcinoma. Singapore Med J. 2008;49:e3-e5.
24.
Domingo C, Ruiz J, Roig J, Texido A, Aguilar X, Morera J. Tuberculosis of the breast: A rare modern disease. Tubercle. 1990;71:221-23. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Banerjee SN, Ananthakrishnan N, Mehta RB, Parkash S. Tuberculous mastitis: A continuing problem. World J Surg. 1987;11:105-09. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Kessler E, Wolloch Y. Granulomatous mastitis: A lesion clinically simulating carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 1972;58(6):642-46. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis in Hispanic women-Indiana, 2006-2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58(47):1317-21.
28.
Gautier N, Lalonde L, Tran-Thanh D, El Khoury M, David J, Labelle M, et al. Chronic granulomatous mastitis: Imaging, pathology and management. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(4):e165-75. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Erhan Y, Veral A, Kara E, Ozdemir N, Kapkac M, Ozdedeli E, et al. A clinicopthologic study of a rare clinical entity mimicking breast carcinoma: Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis. Breast. 2000;9(1):52-56. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Laws A, Xu Y, Kong S, Brisson AM, Bouchard-Fortier A, Quan ML. Breast biopsy during post-treatment surveillance of screen-detected breast cancer patients yields high rates of benign findings. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:2689-97. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Fiorucci F, Conti V, Lucantoni G. Sarcoidosis of the breast: A rare case report and a review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2006;10(2):47-50.
32.
Panzacchi R, Gallo C, Fois F. Primary sarcoidosis of the breast: Case description and review of the literature. Pathologica. 2010;102(3):104-07.
33.
Imoto S, Kitaya T, Kodama T, Hasebe T, Mukai K. Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: Case report and review of the literature. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1997;27:274-77. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Nguyen MH, Molland JG, Kennedy S, Gray TJ, Limaye S. Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: Case series and clinical review. Intern Med J. 2021;51(11):1791-97. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Mathew Thomas V, Alexander S, Bindal P. Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis-a mystery yet to be unraveled: A case series and review of literature. Cureus. 2020;12(2):e6895. [crossref]
36.
Wang J, Zhang Y, Lu X. Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis with skin rupture: A retrospective cohort study of 200 patients who underwent surgical and nonsurgical treatment. J Invest Surg. 2021;34(7):810-15. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Li J. Diagnosis and treatment of 75 patients with idiopathic lobular granulomatous mastitis. J Invest Surg. 2019;32(5):414-20. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Shin YD, Park SS, Song YJ, Son SM, Choi YJ. Is surgical excision necessary for the treatment of Granulomatous lobular mastitis? BMC Womens Health. 2017;17(1):49. [crossref][PubMed]
39.
lrayes A, Almarzooq R, Abdulla HA. Surgical treatment of granulomatous mastitis: Our experience in Bahrain. Breast J. 2019;25(5):958-62.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61735.17730

Date of Submission: Nov 21, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 06, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 23, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 28, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 15, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jan 21, 2023 (6%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com