Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 26019

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : EC13 - EC17 Full Version

Evaluation of Human Leukocyte Antigen-B27 Expression in Patients with Spondylopathy/Spondylitis by Flowcytometry


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60164.17738
Deepali Saxena, Pankaj Arora, Seema Acharya, Sana Ahuja

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Pathology, Shri Guru Ram Rai College of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Shri Guru Ram Rai College of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 3. Professor, Department of Pathology, Shri Guru Ram Rai College of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Shri Guru Ram Rai College of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

Correspondence Address :
Sana Ahuja,
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Shri Guru Ram Rai College of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
E-mail: sanaahuja11@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: The role of immune mediated injury in pathogenesis of Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is well established. HLA B27, a Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class I molecule is one of the major genetic risk factors associated with the disease. Various techniques are used for testing HLA-B27 which includes Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) based tests, Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and flowcytometry. Flowcytometry has gained popularity due to ease of procedure, shortened turnaround time and cost-effectiveness.

Aim: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of flowcytometry for HLA-B27 detection, taking PCR assay as the gold standard along with its association with demographic, clinicopathological and radiological parameters.

Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in Department at Pathology of Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, India, for a period of 18 months from January 2020 to June 2021. The study included 51 patients for which HLA-B27 typing was done cases by flowcytometry and Sequence Specific Allele (SSA) PCR/Real time PCR on peripheral blood samples. The association of HLA-B27 with clinical features {Inflammatory Back Pain (IBP), arthritis, psoriasis, uveitis, dactylitis, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), cervicitis, urethritis, diarrhoea) along with MRI findings (sacroilitis)}, laboratory findings {C-reactive protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)} was evaluated. The performance analysis parameters of flowcytometry were evaluated both by excluding and including the cases in grey zone taking PCR as gold standard. Statistical testing was conducted with SPSS 20.0. Chi-square test or Fisher’s-exact test were used and a p-value of less than 0.05 was taken as significant.

Results: A significant association of HLA-B27 was seen only with IBP (p-value=0.001) and sacroilitis (p-value=0.03). Of the 22 (43.1%) patients positive for HLA-B27 by PCR, 18 (81.8%) patients were positive while the remaining 4 (18.1%) were in grey zone by flowcytometry. Of the 29 (56.9%) patients testing negative by PCR, 27 (93.1%) patients were negative, 1 (3.4%) was in grey zone and 1 (3.4%- false positive) tested positive for HLA-B27 by flowcytometry. Sensitivity and specificity of flowcytometry for detection of HLA-B27 was found to be 100% and 96.4%, respectively when grey zone cases were excluded.

Conclusion: The study brings to light that flowcytometry is a fairly specific and sensitive method for HLA-B27 detection with a high Negative Predictive Value (NPV) (100%) and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) (94.7%). In the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) era, it reiterates the importance of flowcytometry for HLA-B27 especially when PCR is overburdened.

Keywords

Diagnostic technique, Grey zone, Immune mediated, Polymerase chain reaction

The aetiopathogenesis of AS is poorly understood but role of immune mediated injury is well established (1),(2). Genetic risk factors contribute about 80-90% to susceptibility to AS. One of the major genetic risk factor is Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) B27, a MHC class I molecule. HLA-B27 is found in less than 8% of the general population while 90% of patients with AS express this antigen (3). There are 105 subtypes of B27 coded by 132 alleles. Not all alleles are associated with AS, the association strength varying with ethnicity (2).

The HLA-B27 status can neither exclude nor confirm the diagnosis of AS on its own. However, in a clinically suspicious patient with radiological sacroilitis, HLA-B27 positivity is highly suggestive of AS and hence is an important diagnostic criteria as per Assessment of Spondylo Arthritis International Society (ASAS) (3).

Various techniques are used for testing HLA-B27 which include PCR based tests, Microlymphocytotoxicity Test (MLCT), ELISA, flowcytometry and Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Flowcytometry has gained popularity due to ease of procedure, shortened turnaround time and cost-effectiveness as compared to established PCR based tests (4).

The objectives of the present study were to assess the sensitivity and specificity of flowcytometry for HLA-B27 detection, taking PCR assay as the gold standard along with association of HLA-B27 expression with demographic, clinicopathological and radiological parameters.

Material and Methods

It was a prospective study conducted in the Department of Pathology and Central Molecular Research Laboratory at Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India for a period of 18 months from January 2020 to June 2021. It was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee vide IEC no. SGRR/IEC/22/19.

Inclusion criteria: All patients referred from Surgery, Neurosurgery and Orthopaedics OPD who were clinically suspected of having Spondyloarthropathy (SpA) in the above period, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients positive for rheumatoid factor were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

A detailed clinical history of the patient was obtained and relevant information was entered on the predesigned proforma (Inflammatory Back Pain (IBP), arthritis, psoriasis, uveitis, dactylitis, IBD, cervicitis, urethritis, diarrhoea, sacroilitis, MRI findings along with ESR and CRP values). After obtaining an informed consent blood was collected by venepuncture observing asepsis.

The samples were subjected to PCR followed by flowcytometry in order to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of flowcytometry. Additionally, the association of HLA-B27 expression with the above demographic, clinicopathological and radiological parameters was also assessed.

Sample collection: A 2.5 mL of EDTA whole blood was used for PCR and flowcytometry for detection of HLA-B27. PCR and flowcytometry were done within 24 and 48 hours of collection of sample respectively. All the samples were <48-hour-old in the present study.

All patients, who were clinically suspected of having SpA in the above period (18 months), were included in the study. Thus, a total of 51 cases were included in the study comprising approximately equal numbers of both HLA-B27 positive and negative cases (depending on PCR results).

HLA-B27 by PCR : SSA PCR and Real time (RT) PCR were the molecular methods used for detection of HLA-B27. A total of 28 patients were tested by sequence specific PCR (SSA) and 23 patients were tested by RT-PCR.

DNA extraction and amplification: PCR was carried out using the standard methods and was same for both the methods. Manual extraction of DNA was done followed by amplification using PCR master mix comprising reaction buffer, deoxynucleotide triphosphates, MgCl2, primers, Taq DNA polymerase and nuclease free water. The amplified products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualised by staining with ethidium bromide.

Interpretation of SSA PCR: Appearance of 145 base pair (bp) specific band indicated the presence of HLA-B27 gene.

Human growth hormone, seen at 430 bp was the internal control [5,6].

Interpretation of Real time PCR : Cycle threshold (CT) value of 35 was taken as the cut-off. Samples with a CT value of 35 or more were considered as negative for HLA-B27. Samples with CT values of less than 35 were reported as positive for HLA-B27 [5,6].

HLA-B27 by flowcytometry: The blood samples were stained with Fluorescein Isothiocyanate (FITC) labelled Anti HLA-B27 clone GS 145.2 (IgG1 Kappa) and phycoerythrin (PE) labelled CD3 clone SK 7(IgG1 Kappa). Processing was done by stain-lyse-wash protocol (7).

The sample was acquired in BD FACS Canto II 8 colour flowcytometer and analysed using FACS Canto II software. Atleast 10,000 lymphocytes were selected for analysis through forward scatter/side scatter gating technique.

Sample analysis: T lymphocytes were gated in dot plots of CD3 PE versus side scatter. The T-lymphocyte population was displayed in a FITC/FL1 histogram, where Log Median Fluorescence (LMF) was calculated. Samples with LMF greater than equal to 157 (that is 10 units greater than the decision marker 147 mentioned on the reagent vial for HLA-B27 FITC/CD3 PE) were taken to be HLA-B27 positive, while samples with LMF less than the marker i.e., 147 were considered HLA-B27 negative. The grey zone was defined as 147-157 and was the ‘Manufacturer Defined Equivocal Range’ (MDER) (7).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical testing was conducted with SPSS 20.0. Continuous variables were presented as mean±SD while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Categorical data between the groups was compared using Chi-square test or Fisher’s-exact test, as appropriate. The comparison of normally distributed continuous variables between the groups was performed using student’s t-test and ANOVA applied for more than two groups/categories comparison.

The sensitivity and specificity of HLA-B27 evaluation by flowcytometry was also done.

Sensitivity=True positive/(True positive+False negative)
Specificity=True negative/(True negative+False positive)
PPV=True positive/(True positive+False positive)
NPV=True negative/(True negative+False negative)

For all statistical tests, a p-value less than 0.05 were taken to be indicative of significant association.

Results

Majority (16 cases-31.3%) of the patients were in the age group 31-40 years of age with a male to female ratio of 5.3:1 among the HLA-B27 positive cases (Table/Fig 1). Forty cases (78.4 %) included in this study were less than 45 years of age, irrespective of their HLA B27 status.

The association of HLA-B27 by flowcytometry was evaluated with clinicopathological parameters (Table/Fig 2) and a significant association (p-value=0.001) was seen only with IBP and with sacroilitis (p-value=0.03).

A total of 28 patients were tested by sequence specific PCR (SSA) and 23 patients were tested by RT-PCR. Of the 22 (43.1%) patients positive for HLA-B27 by PCR, 18 (81.8%) patients were positive, while the remaining 4 (18.1%) were in grey zone by flowcytometry (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5). Of the 29 (56.9%) patients tested negative by PCR, 27 (93.1%) patients were negative, one (3.4%) was in grey zone and one (3.4%- false positive) tested positive for HLA-B27 by flowcytometry (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5).

The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of flowcytometry was calculated both by excluding and including the cases in the grey zone (LMF=147-157) (Table/Fig 6), taking PCR as gold standard. A higher sensitivity (100%) was observed when the grey zone cases were excluded (sensitivity of 81.8% if grey zone cases included) while specificity (96.4% vs 96.5%) was almost equivalent in both the methods. A high NPV (100%) and PPV (94.7%) were observed when grey zone cases were excluded.

Discussion

In the present study, a total of 51 patients with clinical suspicion of SpA were selected and tested for the presence of HLA-B27 antigen by both PCR technique and flowcytometry. Skare TL et al., from Brazil evaluated 1424 SpA patients and noted that the mean age at disease onset was 28.56±12.34 years with 81.8% being affected before the age of 40 and another 7.5% patients between the ages of 41-45 years (8).

In the present study, MDER or grey zone was taken as 147-157 i.e., 10 channels up from the suffix mentioned on the vial (147) (7). The authors encountered 5 (9.8%) patients in grey zone, of which 4 patients were positive for HLA-B27 and one patient was negative for HLA-B27 by PCR.

The IBP is the most common and foremost symptom of axial SpA. The severity and duration of IBP mirrors the extent of inflammation of sacroiliac joints, spine and spinal entheses (9). In 2009, ASAS developed a new classification criteria for IBP which included: 1) Insidious onset; 2) Pain at night (with improvement upon getting up); 3) Age at onset <40 year; 4) Improvement with exercise; 5) No improvement with rest. The sensitivity of IBP for a diagnosis of axial SpA has been shown to be about 70% (3),(10). In a population-based study in Germany, >60% of patients (n=90) had symptoms suggestive of IBP, with 47% in the human leucocyte antigen B27 positive (HLA-B27+) group and 4% in the B27 negative group (11). Similarly, 41% cases in the present study reported IBP and 66% of them tested positive for HLA-B27 by flowcytometry. A significant association was noted between IBP and HLA-B27 in the present study.

The HLA-B27 is a genetic biomarker of joint disease in psoriasis patients and is also a marker of disease expression in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (12). HLA-B27 was present in about 20% of the cases {Odds Ratio (OR) 3.03} in the largest study performed for the association of HLA with PsA in Canada, including 678 cases and 688 controls (13). Contrary to published literature, in the present study no statistically significant association was noted between HLA-B27 expression and psoriasis, possibly due to small size of the study population.

Dactylitis, or “sausage-like” digit, is a typical manifestation of SpA (14). Arevalo M, found that HLA-B27 positivity confers risk for an early disease onset and family aggregation. However, they found that cases negative for HLA-B27 had a higher propensity for peripheral arthritis, dactylitis and other extra articular manifestations (15). In the present study, only one patient had history of dactylitis and tested positive for HLA-B27.

The prevalence of AS in patients with ulcerative colitis is 2.6% and that in Crohn’s Disease is 6%, giving an overall prevalence of 3.7% in patients with IBD (16),(17). In the present study, only 5.8% cases had history of IBD and it was not significantly associated with HLA-B27 positivity.

The SpAs are long standing chronic inflammatory conditions and patients generally have elevated acute phase reactant proteins in their blood. Akassou A and Bakri Y studied phenotype association with HLA-B27 status in patients with SpA and found that patients positive for HLA-B27 presented with more severe and active disease (18). CRP and ESR are the two most commonly used markers of disease however; they have both low sensitivity and specificity (19). An elevated CRP is included in the ASAS Axial SpA classification criteria as a measure of disease activity. An elevated CRP or ESR is present in only about 40-50% of patients with AS, therefore, a normal ESR or CRP does not rule out AS or comprehensively capture active disease (20). High CRP is also associated with higher incidence of radiographic changes on spine X-rays and signs of inflammation on sacroiliac MRI (21). A recent paper mentions high sensitivity CRP to correlate better than routine CRP with clinical disease activity parameters in patients with axial SpA (22). In the present study, no statistically significant correlation was found between CRP/ESR and HLA-B27 expression.

Involvement of sacroiliac joints is the hallmark of axial SpA with sacroilitis being the first manifestation. The most sensitive imaging technique for its detection is MRI (23). Similar to published literature, in the present study a statistically significant association was noted between sacroilitis and HLA-B27 expression.

The intermediate LMF in 4 of the equivocal cases by flowcytometry and positive by PCR technique could be attributed either to masking effect of co-existing HLA B07 or a subtype of HLA-B27 which has lower expression when assessed by flowcytometry (24). Other causes of decreased LMF in HLA-B27 positive cases seen by other authors include age of the sample and treatment status of patients (25).

In the present study, of the 29 patients who tested negative by PCR, 27 patients were negative for HLA-B27 by flowcytometry as well. Two cases, one equivocal by flowcytometry and one positive by flowcytometry, were found to be negative by PCR technique, which could be due to presence of cross reactive groups like HLA B37 and HLA B07. Usually, these groups cause an equivocal LMF but rarely may cause a false positive result especially with HLA B07 (26),(27). The percentage of samples in grey zone in different studies along with the clone used is summarised in (Table/Fig 7) (4),(7),(26),(28).

However, Skalska U et al., in their study concluded that additional presence of HLA B07 can result in false negative results by flowcytometry using GS 145.2 monoclonal antibody, due to its cross reactivity leading to masking of coexisting HLA-B27 antigen (25).

There were five samples which tested equivocal in the present study which would definitely require confirmation by molecular testing, as per the manufacturer’s guidelines. In the present study, the authors found discordance (one false positive) between PCR and flowcytometry even when the five cases in the grey zone were excluded.

The performance analysis in the present study implies that flowcytometry has a NPV of 100% though the PPV is 94.7%. (Table/Fig 8) summarises the comparison of performance analysis parameters of various studies (4),(25),(29),(30). Thus, the present study is in concordance with previous studies (7),(25),(26),(27),(28),(29) and manufacturer guidelines, where further testing of equivocal cases is mandatory. Furthermore, in the present study, the authors found that cases negative by flowcytometry do not require confirmation, while need for additional PCR testing for positive cases should be assessed by the clinician.

Limitation(s)

The present study was limited by non availability of allele sequencing for HLA-B27 to correlate the LMF obtained in all cases with presence of cross reactivity groups and various subtypes of HLA-B27.

Conclusion

Despite the established efficacy of flowcytometry the issue of antibody cross reactivity persists. The concept of grey zone identifies the subset of such patients, thus subjecting them to further testing. Although the sample size was limited, the study brings to light that flowcytometry is a fairly specific and sensitive method for HLAB27 detection with a high NPV. Taking PCR as gold standard, a higher sensitivity (100%) was observed when the grey zone cases were excluded (sensitivity of 81.8% if grey zone cases included) while specificity (96.4% vs 96.5%) was almost equivalent in both the methods. In the COVID-19 era, it reiterates the importance of flowcytometry for HLA-B27 especially when PCR is overburdened.

References

1.
Mehra NK. The HLA Complex in Biology and Medicine: A Resource Book. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2010;1(1):259-76.
2.
Khan MA. Polymorphism of HLA-B27: 105 subtypes currently known. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2013;15(10):362-67. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: A guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:ii1-44. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Demirel GY, Guzel O. Accurate and simple interpretation of HLA-B27 screening by flow cytometry. Turk J Immunol. 2016;4(1):01-06. [crossref]
5.
Sharma N, Sharma V, Masood T, Nautiyal SC, Sailwal S, Singh RK, et al. Usage of conventional PCR technology for the detection of HLA-B27 Allele: A significant molecular marker of ankylosing spondylitis. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2013;28:189-92. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Roelandse-Koop EA, Buisman B, van Hannen EJ, van der Zee A, Kortlandt W, Hermans MH, et al. Rapid HLA-B27 screening with real-time TaqMan PCR: A clinical validation in the Dutch population. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:1979-85. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Chheda P, Warghade S, Mathias J, Dama T, Matkar S, Shah N, et al. HLA-B27 testing: A journey from flow cytometry to molecular subtyping. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018;32(5):01-09. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Skare TL, Leite N, Bortoluzzo AB, Gonçalves CR, da Silva JA, Ximenes AC, et al. Effect of age at disease onset in the clinical profile of spondyloarthritis: A study of 1424 Brazilian patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30(3):351-57.
9.
Akgul O, Ozgocmen S. Classification criteria for spondyloarthropathies. World J Orthop. 2011;2(12):107-15. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Brandt HC, Sieper J. Performance of referral recommendations in patients with chronic back pain and suspected axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(2007):1479-84. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Brandt J, Bollow M, Häberle J, Rudwaleit M, Eggens U, Distler A, et al. Studying patients with inflammatory back pain and arthritis of the lower limbs clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging: Many, but not all patients with sacroiliitis have spondyloarthropathy. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38(9):831-36. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Braun J, Bollow M, Remlinger G, Eggens U, Rudwaleit M, Distler A, et al. Prevalence of spondylarthropathies in HLA-B27 positive and negative blood donors. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 1998;41(1):58-67. 3.0.CO;2-G>[crossref][crossref]
13.
Nestle FO, Kaplan DH, Barker J. Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(5):496-509. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Siegel DM, Baum J. HLA-B27 associated dactylitis in children. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(6):976-77.
15.
Arévalo M. Influence of HLA-B27 on the Ankylosing Spondylitis phenotype: Results from the REGISPONSER database. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20(221):1724-27. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Palm O, Moum B, Ongre A, Gran JT. Prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis and other spondyloarthropathies among patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A population study (the IBSEN study). J Rheumatol. 2002;29(3):511-15.
17.
Wright V. Seronegative polyarthritis. A unified concept. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 1978;21(6):619-33. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Akassou A, Bakri Y. Does HLA-B27 status influence ankylosing spondylitis phenotype? Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;11:1179544117751627. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Spoorenberg JPL. Outcome and disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis: An international study. Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht, 2003;1:1-135.
20.
Rudwaleit M, Haibel H, Baraliakos X, Listing J, Märker-Hermann E, Zeidler H, et al. The early disease stage in axial spondylarthritis: Results from the german spondyloarthritis inception cohort. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(3):717-27. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Wallis D, Haroon N, Ayearst R, Carty A, Inman RD. Ankylosing spondylitis and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis: Part of a common spectrum or distinct diseases? J Rheumatol. 2013;40(12):2038-41. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Bredella MA, Steinbach LS, Morgan S, Ward M, Davis JC. MRI of the sacroiliac joints in patients with moderate to severe ankylosing spondylitis. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2006;187(6):1420-26. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Poddubnyy D, Rudwaleit M, Listing J, Braun J, Sieper J. Comparison of a high sensitivity and standard C reactive protein measurement in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2010;69(7):1338-41. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Diekhoff T, Hermann KGA, Greese J, Schwenke C, Poddubnyy D, Hamm B, et al. Comparison of MRI with radiography for detecting structural lesions of the sacroiliac joint using CT as standard of reference: Results from the SIMACT study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(9):1502-08. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Skalska U, Kozakiewicz A, Mas´ lin´ ski W, Jurkowska M. HLA-B27 detection- comparison of genetic sequence-based method and flow cytometry assay. Reumatologia. 2015;53(2):74-78. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Reynolds WM, Evans PR, Wilson PJ, Wong WM, Darke C, Smith JL. Automated routine HLA-B27 typing by flow cytometry. Journal of Immunological Methods. 1996;197(1):01-05. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Lingenfelter B, Fuller TC, Hartung L, Hunter J, Wittwer C. HLA-B27 screening by flow cytometry. Cytometry. 1995;22(2):146-49. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Bonnaud G, Aupetit C, Preux PM, Cogné M, Drouet M. Optimisation of HLA-B27 testing by association of flow cytometry and DNA typing. Clinical Rheumatology. 1999;18(1):23-27. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Seipp MT, Erali M, Wies RL, Wittwer C. HLA-B27 typing: Evaluation of an allele- specific PCR melting assay and two flow cytometric antigen assays. Cytometry. 2005;63(1):10-15. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Nicknam M, Jamshidi A, Hakemi MG, Khosravi F, Amirkhani A, Narouinejad M, et al. Comparison of validity of microlymphocytotoxicity and flowcytometry methods with PCR For HLA-B27 antigen typing. MJIRI. 2003;17(1):75-79.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60164.17738

Date of Submission: Sep 10, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 10, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 03, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 20, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 12, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Dec 26, 2022 (20%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com