Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 79563

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : DC18 - DC21 Full Version

Burden of Rotavirus Diarrhoea among Children Less than Five Years of Age Attending a Tertiary Care Institute with Acute Gastroenteritis: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61667.17901
Anjum Ara Mir, Bashir Ahmad Fomda, Nargis Bali, Mushtaq Bhat

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Microbiology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 4. Professor, Department of Paediatrics and Neonatology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Bashir Ahmad Fomda,
Faculty Quarters, SKIMS, Srinagar-190011, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
E-mail: bashirfomda@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Diarrhoea due to rotavirus continues to cause significant morbidity in children less than five years of age especially in developing countries. Prior to the incorporation of rotavirus vaccine in the national immunisation program the prevalence of rotavirus in stool samples of children in India has been reported to vary from 4.6-33.7%. However, there is not much data regarding the burden of rotavirus diarrhoea after the widespread use of rotavirus vaccine.

Aim: To find out the extent to which rotavirus is responsible for causing infection in children under five years of age.

Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the Department of Microbiology, in collaboration with the Department of Paediatrics, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India, among children who presented with acute gastroenteritis to the biggest tertiary care institute of the region. After seeking written consent from the parents/caretakers stool samples were collected and subjected to Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Demographic variables including vaccination status and seasonality were recorded for all the cases. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 and p-value of <0.05 was taken as significant.

Results: Of the 279 stool samples received during the study period, a rotavirus positivity of 17.2% was seen with 31 (63.8%) patients affected being males. A total of 37 (77.1%) children belonged to the age group of 0-12 months and 27 (56.3%) of those affected were from rural areas. Diarrhoea was the most common symptom in 28 (58.3%) patients. Most of the rotavirus positive children, that is, 26 (54.2%) were not vaccinated. Majority of the cases, 34 (70.8%), were seen in winter season.

Conclusion: Majority of the children who visited the hospital were not vaccinated and were rotavirus positive despite a robust vaccination program. This puts an emphasis on the need to improve the vaccination rates in order to fight this illness.

Keywords

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Immunisation, Kashmir, Vaccination

First described by Ruth Bishop and associates in 1973 in children presenting with gastroenteritis, rotaviruses are a leading cause of acute, severe, dehydrating gastroenteritis in children less than five years of age globally, with more than 25 million outpatient visits and around two million hospitalisations attributable to rotavirus infections every year (1),(2). In developing countries, the attack rate is high among children aged 6-12 months whereas in the developed nations children of 12-14 months are predominantly infected (3),(4). The rotaviruses have a Group-Antigen, the protein VP6 present in the middle capsid on the basis of which these are classified into nine groups, namely: Group-A Rotavirus (RVA), Group-B Rotavirus (RVB), Group-C Rotavirus (RVC), Group-D Rotavirus (RVD), Group-E Rotavirus E (RVE), Group-F Rotavirus (RVF), Group-G Rotavirus (RVG), Group-H Rotavirus (RVH) and Group-I Rotavirus (RVI). Among these, RVA, RVB, RVC and RVH are associated to acute gastroenteritis in humans and animals (5). The virus is shed in very high concentrations and for many days in the stools and vomitus of those infected. Transmission occurs mostly by the faecal-oral route, from one person to another by close contact and via fomites (6). The most common symptoms are vomiting, diarrhoea and fever that can cause significant dehydration and reduced oral intake often necessiating hospitalisation. In severe cases death can occur if timely intervention is not sought (7). Despite the availability of a vaccine, clean drinking water supply and good sanitation practices, infections due to rotavirus continue to occur throughout the world.

Rotavirus gastroenteritis is clinically indistinguishable from diarrhoeal diseases caused by other enteric pathogens and laboratory testing is generally not done; however it is the only way to confirm the diagnosis. In cases with prolonged diarrhoea or complicated cases or immuno-compromised patients, when alternative diagnoses are considered, or when epidemiologic or infection control data is desired, it may be valuable to establish rotavirus as the causative agent (8). The definitive diagnosis of rotavirus gastroenteritis is also paramount in preventing the unnecessary use of antibiotics in such cases.

For laboratory confirmation, antigen testing can be done in stool samples using ELISA or immunochromatography. Other modalities of detection include Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), assays which is more sensitive and allow genotyping of virus isolates, electron microscopy, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, antigen detection assays, and virus isolation (8). The positivity of rotavirus in stool samples in India has varied from 4.6-33.7% (9). In Jammu and Kashmir, one study documented the attack rate to be around 20% whereas another study conducted in two major hospitals reported the prevalence of rotaviral diarrhoea to be 45% (10),(11). However, not much data regarding the epidemiology of rotavirus is available from this part of the country especially after the introduction of vaccine against it. The present study was carried out to generate epidemiological data in terms of rotavirus burden in children less than five years of age who attended the paediatric Outpatient Department and/or were admitted at a tertiary care centre in northern India.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Microbiology, in collaboration with the Department of Paediatrics, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India, a tertiary care hospital for a period of 18 months from 15th December 2019 to 15th June 2021. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institute’s Ethical Clearance Committee bearing the number: RP 54/2020. Written informed consent was sought from the parents/caretakers and a predesigned proforma that included information regarding the age, gender, residence, vaccination status was filled for each participant.

Inclusion criteria:

• All children less than five years of age who presented with acute diarrhoea (>3 unformed stools in 24 hours period) to the hospital.
• Children whose parents/caretakers were willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria:

• Children with primary diagnosis other than acute gastroenteritis.
• Children ≥ five years of age.

Study Procedure

Sample collection and processing: Stool samples were collected in a sterile container and transported to the laboratory as soon as possible. In case of delay, the samples were stored in a refrigerator at 2-8oC. A 10%-20% suspensions were made using Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) for antigen testing. All aliquots of processed samples were stored at -20oC till further testing.

Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELI SA): ELISA was done for all the samples, using a kit that identifies RVA (Premier Rotaclone Meridian Bioscience Inc. USA). The assay was performed as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, all the reagents were brought to room temperature before use. One mL of sample diluent was added to properly marked tube, using a transfer pipette and the sample resuspended in the sample diluent. Sufficient number of wells were snapped off for samples and the controls and inserted into the microtiter well holder following which two drops (100 μl) each of diluted faecal sample, positive control and negative control (sample diluent) and enzyme conjugate were added to the wells. The plate was incubated at room temperature for 60±5 minutes at the end of which, the liquid was poured out of the wells into a discard vessel. All the wells were filled to the brim with deionised water and the liquid was poured out as in previous step. The washing procedure was repeated four more times (for a total of five washes) after which two drops (100 μl) of substrate A solution containing urea peroxide and substrate B solution containing tetramethylbenzidine were added to each well and the plate was incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature. At the end of the incubation period the microtitre plate was examined visually. Spectrophotometric determinations were made by adding two drops (100 μl) of stop solution (sulfuric acid) to each well after the 10 minutes incubation at room temperature. The absorbance of each well was read at 450 nm using a >600 nm reference filter (optional) against an air blank within 60 minutes. The positive and the negative controls were validated according to the kit protocol. For visual evaluation, the positive control was deep blue and easily distinguished from the colourless negative control. For spectrophotometric determination, the absorbance of the positive control was ≥ 0.3 absorbance.

Interpretation of results: Specimens with absorbance units greater than 0.150 on the spectrophotometer were considered positive and those with absorbance equal to or less than 0.150 were considered negative.

Statistical Analysis

The data were entered into the excel and statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 23.0. The p-values were calculated using Chi-square test and p-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Of the 279 stool samples received during the study period, 48 (17.2%) were positive and 231(82.8%) negative for rotavirus antigen by ELISA. Statistically significant number of positive samples, 31 (63.8%) belonged to male patients (p-value=0.0012) and majority were in the age group of 0-12 months, 37 (77.1%) (p-value=0.0001). Rural areas represented 27 (56.3%) positive samples. The most common complaint in the group of children whose stool samples were positive for rotavirus was diarrhoea, 28 (58.3%) followed by diarrhoea and fever, 12 (25%). Differences in the demographic parameters between rotavirus positive and negative patients are shown in (Table/Fig 1).

Also majority of the children; 26 (54.2%) whose stool sample was positive for rotavirus had not received rotavirus vaccine, whereas 6 (12.5%) had received a full course of vaccine, 11 (22.9%) had received only one dose and 5 (10.4%) two doses of the rotavirus vaccine. Significant number of positive cases were recorded in winter season 34 (70.8%) (p-value=0.0001) (Table/Fig 2). All the rotavirus positive cases were treated symptomatically (i.v. fluids and oral rehydration therapy as indicated) and discharged from the hospital without any complications after treatment.

Discussion

After the introduction of rotavirus vaccine in the national immunisation program in the year 2016, this was the first study that looks into the burden of disease caused by this pathogen from this part of the country. A rotavirus positivity of 17.2% was seen in present study which was less as compared to that reported by Shrestha S et al., where the authors found a positivity of 28% and Binka FN et al., who reported a rotavirus positivity of 39% in their study (12),(13). In a large multi-centre study conducted in hospitals across seven cities of India, between July 2012 and June 2016, stool samples of 35.5% patients were found to be positive for rotavirus by Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) (9). However, this was prior to the incorporation of rotavirus vaccine in the national immunisation schedule. Better hygienic practices, awareness of caretakers regarding the disease and its symptoms, vigorous vaccination campaign and the prompt use of oral rehydration solution in case of diarrhoea which circumvents the need for hospitalisation could have been the reason of low rotavirus positivity in present study. Or it could be due to the fact that the study was carried out during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic which could have resulted in less number of parents seeking medical advice for their children suffering from acute gastroenteritis.

Higher detection of rotavirus in male children (63.8%) than in female children (36.2%) was noted in present study. Results similar to present study have been reported previously by other authors as well (9),(12),(14),(15). In present study, a significant rotavirus positivity of 77.1% in the stool samples was noted for children in the age group of 0-12 months. Kheyami AM et al., in their study found that 83% of the cases were in age group of 4-23 months (16). Likewise Agbla JMM et al., in their study found that children aged between 3-24 months were the significantly affected by rotavirus (17), whereas Junaid SA et al., reported that children within the age bracket of 7-12 months had the highest rate of infection (14). Children less than 6 months of age are protected by maternal antibodies and as weaning starts and the protective effects of breastfeeding decrease they become vulnerable to infections (18),(19).

Most of the positive samples in this study were received from children residing in rural areas, 27 (56.3%). Improper sanitation and inaccessibility to proper drinking water in rural areas and low vaccination rates as compared to urban areas could be one of the factors contributing to such an observation. In a study by Tian Y et al., the authors reported higher positivity in cases from urban areas (23.9%) (20), which was in contrast to what was observed in present study. Since rotavirus infection is primarily acquired by feco-oral route it is quite natural that the most common symptoms are those related to the gastrointestinal tract. Diarrhoea was also the most common symptom in the group of children whose stool samples were positive for rotavirus, 28 (58.3%) followed by diarrhoea and fever, 12 (25%) and diarrhoea fever and vomiting 8 (16.7%). Present study results are in accordance to what has been reported by Martinez-Gutierrez M et al., where the authors found that among the rotavirus A-infected children, diarrhoea, fever and vomiting were the most common symptoms (18). Many other study have also reported diarrhoea fever and vomiting to be the most common symptoms associated with rotaviral gastroenteritis (12),(15),(21).

An increased incidence of rotavirus infections during winter or cooler months of the year have been well documented from several parts of the globe (3),(22),(23). Because the survival of rotavirus is better in cooler conditions with low relative humidity, it has been hypothesised that a relative drop in humidity and rainfall combined with drying of soils might increase the aerial transport of dried, contaminated faecal material containing rotavirus (3),(23). Findings from previous Indian studies have also corroborated this. The same was seen in present study where the highest number of cases of acute gastroenteritis sought medical attention during winter season (70.8%); particularly in the months of October and November.

Majority of the children (54.2%) positive for rotavirus in present study had not received rotavirus vaccine, whereas 12.5% had received a full course of vaccine, 22.9% had received only one dose and 10.4% two doses of the rotavirus vaccine. Martinez-Gutierrez M et al., in their study found that most of the rotavirus-positive children had received two doses of rotavirus vaccine; 86.2%, whereas 6.9% had received atleast one dose and 6.9% did not have a vaccination card to confirm rotavirus vaccination (18). (Table/Fig 3) summarises the published literature providing an insight into the impact of rotavirus vaccine on the prevalence of rotaviral diarrhoea in different parts of India (9),(15),(24),(25),(26),(27),(28),(29),(30),(31),(32),(33).

A decrease in the rate of hospitalisations due to rotavirus infection after the introduction of rotavirus vaccine has been reported worldwide. In present study the increased positivity of rotavirus antigen in stool samples of unvaccinated children substantiates the fact that the vaccine is effective in reducing the overall burden of rotavirus illness.

Limitation(s)

Since the study was carried out in a hospital setting a true estimate of the burden of rotaviral diarrhoea in our community can be determined by community based surveillance only. Also, genotyping of the positive samples was not done, which would have given information about the circulating strains.

Conclusion

Rotavirus infection continues to occur in children under the age of five years. Because of similar symptoms most of the diarrhoeal illnesses are treated as bacterial or parasitic in origin. Rotavirus assay should be performed in cases in which bacterial and parasitic assays all show negative results. There is a possibility of overestimation or underestimation of the rate at which the cases of acute gastroenteritis visit the hospitals because of potential referral of these patients to other hospitals especially in the peripheral regions. Continued surveillance of rotaviral illness carried out across different socio-economic strata of our society can in the long run provide meaningful insights so as to guide the vaccination campaign against this disease in future.

Acknowledgement

Authors want to acknowledge all the parents and the children who were part of the study, technical staff who helped in carrying out the study and the nursing staff who helped in collecting samples from infants and children.

Authors’ contributions: AAM: Collected the samples and data from the patients, performed ELISA and wrote the first draft of the study. BAF: Gave the concept for the study, supervised the study and reviewed the literature. NB: Wrote the final draft of the study, did the literature research and performed analysis of the study. MB: Helped in sample collection and provided the clinical details of the patients.

References

1.
Rotavirus- World Health Organization (WHO). https://www.who.int. Downloaded Sep 2022.
2.
Bishop RF, Davidson GP, Holmes IH, Ruck BJ. Virus particles in epithelial cells of duodenal mucosa from children with viral gastroenteritis. Lancet. 1973;1:1281-83. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Azemi M, Berisha M, Ismaili-Jaha V, Kolgeci S, Avdiu M, Akupi X, et al. Socio- demographic, clinical and laboratory features of rotavirus gastroenteritis in children treated in pediatric clinic. Mat Soc Med. 2013;25:09-13. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Wobudeya E, Bachou H, Karamagi CK, Kalyango JN, Mutebi E, Wamani H. Breastfeeding and the risk of rotavirus diarrhea in hospitalised infants in Uganda: A matched case control study. BMC Pediatr. 2011;11:17. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Luchs A, Timenetsky Mdo C. Group-A rotavirus gastroenteritis: Post-vaccine era, genotypes and zoonotic transmission. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2016;14(2):278- 87. Doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082016RB3582. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Estes MK, Greenberg HB. Rotaviruses. In Field’s Virology. Knipe DM, Howley PM. Editors. Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins. 2013; Pp.1347-1401.
7.
Dennehy PH. Rotavirus vaccines: An overview. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(1):198- 208. Doi: 10.1128/CMR.00029-07. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Omatola CA, Olaniran AO. Rotaviruses: From pathogenesis to disease control- A critical review. Viruses. 2022;14:875. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14050875. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Giri S, Nair NP, Mathew A, Manohar B, Simon A, Singh T, et al. Rotavirus gastroenteritis in Indian children < five years hospitalised for diarrhoea, 2012 to 2016. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:69. https://doi.o rg/10.1186/s12889-019- 6406-0. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Karmakar S, Rathore AS, Kadri SM, Dutt S, Khare S, Lal S. Post-earthquake outbreak of rotavirus gastroenteritis in Kashmir (India): An epidemiological analysis. Public Health. 2008;122(10):981-89. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Ahmad I. Rotavirus diarrhea in Kashmir: Detection of genotype G12P (6) strains. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14(1):E468. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2010.02.658. [crossref]
12.
Shrestha S, Thakali O, Raya S, Shrestha L, Parajuli K, Bahadur J. Acute gastroenteritis associated with rotavirus A among children less than 5 years of age in Nepal. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2019;19:456. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12879-019-4092-2. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Binka FN, Anto FK, Oduro AR, Awini EA, Nazzar AK, Armah GE, et al. Incidence and risk factors of paediatric rotavirus diarrhoea in northern Ghana. Trop Med Int Health. 2003;8(9):840-46. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Junaid SA, Umeh C, Olabode AO, Banda. Incidence of rotavirus infection in children with gastroenteritis attending Jos university teaching hospital, Nigeria. Virology Journal. 2011;8:233. http://doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-233. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Girish Kumar CP, Giri S, Sarkar MC, Gopalkrishna V, Chitambar SD, Ray P, et al. Epidemiology of rotavirus diarrhea among children less than 5 years hospitalised with acute gastroenteritis prior to rotavirus vaccine introduction in India. Vaccine. 2020;38:8154-60. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kheyami AM, Nakagomi T, Nakagomi O, Dove W, Hart CA, Cunliffe NA. Molecular epidemiology of rotavirus diarrhea among children in Saudi Arabia: First detection of G9 and G12 strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(4):1185-91. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Agbla JMM, Chichi AC, Agbankp e´ AJ, Dougnon TV, Yadouleton AWM. Epidemiological survey of rotaviruses responsible for infantile diarrhea by the immunomolecular technique in Cotonou. (Benin, West Africa). Int J Microbiol. 2018;2018:3602967. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3602967. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Martinez-Gutierrez M, Arcila-Quiceno V, Trejos-Suarez J, Ruiz-Saenz J. Prevalence and molecular typing of rotavirus in children with acute diarrhea in Northeastern Colombia. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2019;61:e34. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Lestari FB, Vongpunsawad S, Wanlapakorn N, Poovorawan Y. Rotavirus infection in children in Southeast Asia 2008–2018: Disease burden, genotype distribution, seasonality, and vaccination. J Biomed Sci. 2020;27:66. https://doi. org/10.1186/s12929- 020-00649-8. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Tian Y, Chughtai AA, Gao Z, Yan H, Chen Y, Liu B, et al. Prevalence and genotypes of Group-A rotavirus among outpatient children under five years old with diarrhea in Beijing, China, 2011-2016. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2018;18:497. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3411-3. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Sai L, Sun J, Shao L, Chen S, Liu H, Ma L. Epidemiology and clinical features of rotavirus and norovirus infection among children in Ji’nan, China. Virology Journal. 2013;10:302. http://doi:10. 1186/1743-422X-10-302. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Parashar UD, Gibson CJ, Bresee JS, Roger IG. Rotavirus and severe childhood diarrhea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:304-06. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Yousuf FA, Siddiqui R, Khan NA. Presence of rotavirus and free-living amoebae in the water supplies of Karachi, Pakistan. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2017;59:e32. http://dx.doi.org/1 0.159 0/S1678-9946201759032. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Mathew A, Rao PS, Sowmyanarayanan TV, Kang G. Severity of rotavirus gastroenteritis in an Indian population: Report from a 3 year surveillance study. Vaccine. 2014;11:32(Suppl 1):A45-48. Doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.03.038. PMID: 25091679. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Goel AK, Chawla S, Dhingra A, Thiyagarajan V, Nair NP. Rotavirus diarrhea and its determinants among under-five children admitted in a tertiary care hospital of southern Haryana, India. Indian J Pediatr. 2021;88:16-21. Doi: 10.1007/s12098- 020-03616-1. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Dalal P, Gathwala G, Singh J, Nair NP, Thiyagarajan V. Gastroenteritis in Haryana, India post introduction of rotavirus vaccine. Indian J Pediatr. 2021;88:10-15. Doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03614-3. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Sharma J, Chaudhary S, Bajaj M, Nair NP, Thiyagarajan V. Rotavirus gastroenteritis hospitalisations among under-5 children in northern India. Indian J Pediatr. 2021;88:28-34. Doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03621-4. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Goru KB, Manikyamba D, Muppidi VP, Nadipena J, Ravula M, Babji K, et al. Two-year prevalence of rotavirus among under-five children admitted with acute gastroenteritis in Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian J Pediatr. 2021;88:72-77. Doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03608-1. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Chaudhary P, Jain H, Nair NP, Thiyagarajan V. Rotavirus diarrhea in hospitalised under-5 children in Madhya Pradesh, India and the prevalent serotypes after vaccine introduction. Indian J Pediatr. 2021;88:78-83. Doi: 10.1007/s12098- 020-03638-9. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Dass SM, Pattnaik S, Amulya K. A study on prevalence of rotavirus infection in children below 5 years, with acute gastroenteritis. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5(8):3358-36. [crossref]
31.
Kumar A, Pandey A, Singh AK, Dubey A. Genotypic characterization of Group-A rotavirus in children < 5 years of age at tertiary care hospital in North India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2022;40(2):289-93. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.12.009. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Ghoshal V, Das RR, Nayak MK, Singh S, Das P, Mohakud NK. Climatic parameters and rotavirus diarrhea among hospitalised children: A study of Eastern India. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:573448. Doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.573448. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Gupta V, Aggarwal P, Kumar B, Nair NP, Thiyagarajan V, Lingam R. Rotavirus gastroenteritis in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Indian J Pediatr. 2021;88:66-71. Doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03625-0.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61667.17901

Date of Submission: Nov 20, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 17, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 14, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: The study was funded by Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences.
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 26, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 13, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jan 05, 2023 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com