Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 42650

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : April | Volume : 17 | Issue : 4 | Page : BC01 - BC04 Full Version

Establishing Reference Interval for Fasting Blood Glucose in Healthy Adults of Ambalapuzha, Kerala, India: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: April 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63055.17676
KM Rajesh, Roopa P Kulkarni, Sajith Vilambil, Lyson Lonappan, Jyothsna, Jobinse Jose

1. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College, Wayanad, Kerala, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Dr. Moopen’s Medical College, Naseera Nagar, Wayanad, Kerala, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Government Medical College, Wayanad, Kerala, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College, Idukki, Kerala, India. 5. Registrar, Department of Biochemistry, KIMS Hospitals, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. 6. Postgraduate, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Lyson Lonappan,
Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College, Idukki Colony-685602, Kerala, India.
E-mail: drlyson@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Fasting blood glucose is one of the major tests in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of Diabetes Mellitus. Researchers have found the racial/ethnic differences in reference interval of common biochemical and haematological laboratory tests. Reference Intervals denotes normative values related to laboratory parameters/analytes used by diagnostic centres for clinical diagnosis. An appropriate reference value is essential for effective clinical decision making.

Aim: To establish reference intervals for fasting blood glucose in healthy adult population of Ambalapuzha, North Grama Panchayath, Kerala, India.

Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Biochemistry, Government T.D. Medical College, Ambalapuzha, Alappuzha, Kerala, India, from February 2018 to August 2018. A total of 420 healthy individuals were included in the study. After random selection of subjects, fasting blood samples were collected and all the samples were analysed for fasting blood glucose levels. Data was analysed statistically by using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test. Mean, standard deviation, reference interval and comparison between both sexes and different age groups were done.

Results: Out of 420 individuals, 166 (39.5%) were males and 254 (60.5%) were females. The mean level of glucose was 80.97±10.113 mg% and the standard error of means was 0.493. The study population was categorised into 20-29 years, 30-39 years, 40-49 years and 50-59 years age groups. When compared those age groups, the mean blood glucose level was highest (83.81 mg%) for the age group 50-59 years. Significant difference in mean was seen when 30-39 years and 40-49 years was compared with 50-59 years age category.

Conclusion: The study concluded that there was no difference in the reference range established between males and females. There was a significant difference in the mean fasting blood glucose among different age groups.

Keywords

Blood sample, Diabetes mellitus, Reference range

Laboratory test reports play a pivotal role in diagnosis and prognosis of many diseases. Nearly 80% of physicians’ medical decisions are based on information provided by laboratory reports (1). This invariably requires appropriate Reference Interval (RI) for effective clinical decision making.

An appropriate RI adds value to the report and without RI, report interpretation becomes compromised. RI is defined by Ceriotti as an interval that, when applied to the population serviced by the laboratory correctly includes most of the subjects with characteristics similar to the reference group and excludes the others (2). As defined by International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC), reference sample group is an adequate number of reference individuals (an individual selected for comparison using defined criteria) taken to represent the reference population. Ideally, they should be randomly drawn from the reference population (3).

Most laboratories use RI from the manufacturer method sheets or standard books due to the tedious process and high expenses involved in the process of establishing laboratory RI. However, these RIs may not be applicable to the local population despite using similar methods and instruments. The reason for this could be due to differences in patient population, operating conditions, selection criteria for healthy individuals, geographic variations and many more. Also Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) endorses that the best means to establish a reference interval is to collect samples from sufficient number of reference individuals (4). This further emphasises the need for every laboratory to establish their own RI for making laboratory reports more useful in clinical decision making.

Fasting plasma glucose continues to be one of the essential tests in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) (5). It detects hyperglycaemia at prediabetic stage and with lifestyle, dietary modifications, prevent the development of overt DM. There is a need to establish the RI for fasting plasma glucose to make laboratory reports more useful in clinical decision making and for better healthcare management. Hence, present study was conducted to know the RI for Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) in the local population of Ambalapuzha, Kerala, India.

Material and Methods

The present cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Biochemistry, Government T.D. Medical College, Ambalapuzha, Alappuzha, Kerala, India, from February 2018 to August 2018. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee and Institutional Research Board (EC27/2017 dated 23-03-2017). Study subjects were counselled separately about the study and written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Inclusion criteria: Apparently healthy individuals, aged between 20-65 years, irrespective of gender were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Based on International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) guidelines (6), subjects with renal failure, congestive heart disease, chronic respiratory disease, liver disease, malabsorption syndromes, nutritional anaemias, infections, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperthyroidism, pregnant women, psychological and mental disorders, obese {Body Mass Index (BMI) >30 kg/m2} were excluded. Subjects with a history of alcohol, tobacco, OCP, replacement or supplementation therapy like insulin, nephrotoxic drugs like chronic Non Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) usage, aminoglycoside antibiotics, anticancer drugs, antipsychotics, steroids and other hyperglycaemic agents were also excluded from the study.

According to IFCC recommendations minimum sample size was 120 (7). Authors have included 420 subjects in the study. A total of 484 healthy volunteers who attended the free medical camp in Ambalapuzha north grama panchayath, Kerala, India, were randomly enrolled in the study. Out of 484 volunteers 64 were excluded from the study as outliers. Outliers were identified in Interquartile Ranges (IQR: Q3-Q1; Q1: lower quartile, Q3: upper quartile). At levels of < Q1-1.5 IQR and/or > Q3+1.5 IQR, the outliers were discarded (8),(9).

All samples were analysed at Clinical Chemistry wing of Centralised Laboratory in Government Medical College and Hospital. Demographic details such as name, age, residence etc., were collected from all the study participants.

Study Procedure

Fasting blood samples of 5 mL were collected in dry disposable syringe under aseptic conditions from antecubital vein of the subjects, between 8 am to 9.30 am after overnight fasting for 10-12 hours. For testing plasma glucose, samples were collected in fluoride tubes under aseptic precautions. Cold chain was maintained throughout sample collection and analysis of samples. Samples were analysed on the same day of collection. Blood sugar was analysed in fully automated analyser (Beckmann Coulter Au 680 chemistry analyzer) with closed system pack, with trilevel QC (Bio-Rad) and calibrators. External Quality Assurance Scheme (EQAS) for the test was done periodically with Christian Medical College (CMC), Vellore, India. Method used in testing was IFCC recommended.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical data was analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25.0. Qualitative data was expressed as percentages. Continuous variables were expressed as mean±Standard Deviation (SD). Difference between the groups were analysed by simple Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) but the subgroup analysis in each variable was done by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) analysis.

Results

In the present study, out of 420 individuals, 166 (39.5%) were males and 254 (60.5%) were females.The study population were categorised into 20-29 years, 30-39 years, 40-49 years and 50-59 years age groups. Out of 420 subjects, majority 107 (25.48%) were aged between 50-59 years followed by the 105 (25%) in 30-39 years age agroup. Least number of subjects were 4 (0.95%) were aged between 60-65 years (Table/Fig 1).

In present study, the mean level of glucose was 80.97±10.113 mg% and the standard error of means was 0.493 (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3). Males had slightly higher glucose level than females (82.33 mg% as against 80.09 mg%), however it was statistically insignificant (Table/Fig 4). The mean blood glucose level was highest (83.81 mg%) for the age group 50-59 years. There was no significant difference within group (Table/Fig 5).

In the present study, the Tukey’s HSD shows that the mean difference between the 30-39 years age category and 50-59 years age category was statistically significant (p-value=0.030). The mean difference between the 40-49 years age category and 50-59 years age category was statistically significant (p value=0.005) (Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

In clinical management of patients, physicians depend on clinical chemistry analytes for accurate diagnosis, appropriate treatment and follow-up of patients. Correct interpretation of the results from these analytes is only possible if the physician has good reference interval information. Most of the available reference ranges are of the western population which differ from the study population by age, sex, genetics, diet, and altitude. In addition, the reference ranges in the kit inserts that most of the laboratories follow are extrapolated from a smaller cohort, which warrants the need for each laboratory to establish its own reference range (10).

In present study mean fasting blood glucose level was 80.97 mg/dL. The mean fasting blood glucose level was similar to present study as demonstrated by Mohammed O et al., and Bhuvanendranath H et al., (11),(12). The mean fasting glucose values were higher than the current study in an Ethiopian study by Fiseha T et al., (13).

The mean fasting glucose values in the present study were slightly on the higher side with that of the kit inserts that is followed in most of the Indian laboratories. Castillo O et al., has concluded that those residing in sea level can have a higher glucose value than those residing in higher altitude (14). The present study was conducted in Alappuzha district in Kerala which is at sea level and the above-mentioned difference substantiates this fact. However, another study showed no significant difference between people living in high altitudes or at sea level (15).

Haggstrom M, has stated that the standard reference range basically originates in what is most prevalent in a reference group taken from the population. He has added that the 95% prediction interval, is often estimated by assuming a normal distribution of the measured parameter, in which case it can alternatively be defined as the interval limited by 1.96 (often rounded upto 2) population standard deviations from either side of the population mean. He has added that reference ranges can also be established directly from the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile of the measurements in the reference group. Likewise the reference range established from this study is 61-100.7 mg/dL, which is on par with most of the studies from the western population (16).

The references range for fasting blood glucose established in the current study was on lower side as compared to worldwide reference range as shown by Fiseha T et al., (13). However, there was difference in range when compared with study by Chhatriwala Mitul N et al., (17).

Racial/ethnic differences in reference interval of common biochemical and haematological laboratory tests in Asians, Blacks, Hispanics and Whites were analysed by Lim E et al., using their National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Significant racial/ethnic differences were found in almost all laboratory tests including blood glucose levels. They have concluded that racial/ethnic subpopulations have unique distributions in the laboratory tests and race/ethnicity considerations must be incorporated in the development of reference intervals for more accurate disease diagnosis and appropriate treatment (18).

Likewise, Malati T has opined that considering enormous racial and ethnic diversity of Indian population, it is mandatory to establish reference intervals specific to Indian population (19). The reference values of common blood chemistry analytes in healthy population, aged newborn to 80 years, of Rawalpindi Islamabad area were determined by Khan FA et al., In healthy adult males, the reference values were of fasting plasma glucose was 3.6-6.0 mmol/L and the values in adult females and elderly subjects were slightly different than adult males. The reference values of their population showed mild to moderate differences from the other Asian, European and American populations. Finally, they concluded that reference values of different biochemical investigations should be established in various areas differently (20).

In the present study, the mean fasting glucose was 82.33 mg/dL in males and 80.09 mg/dL among females and the difference was not statistically significant, similar findings were noted in a similar study in kenyan population (21). In contrast, a study by Cheneke W et al., in Ethiopia, has concluded that reference interval for RBS differ significantly among males and females in all age groups (22). In the present study, though insignificant, the mean values of glucose levels in males were slightly higher than females. Soeters MR et al., has opined that the slightly higher mean values in males can be explained with the lower baseline insulin levels and higher among females (23). However, in a study by Chhatriwala Mitul N et al., mean and SD values of random blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose was higher for males and fasting blood glucose and HbA1c was higher for females. Kutty VR et al., and TC Ko et al., has concluded that the increment of plasma glucose per decade was almost twice as high in women than in men. They accounted it to a rapid deterioration in insulin resistance in women after menopause, though concluded that the exact mechanism was elusive (24),(25). In a Multiple Regression Analysis (MRA) and nested ANOVA test by Shah SA et al., it was found that both age and BMI were apparent sources of variation for many analytes in both sexes (26).

In the present study four age groups (20-29 years, 30-39 years, 40-49 years and 50-59 years) were compared. Significant difference was seen when 30-39 years and 40-49 years was compared with 50-59 years age category. And there was no significant difference in other categories. Likewise in a Chinese study, TC Ko et al, there were significant positive correlations between age and plasma glucose after the adjustment for body mass index, smoking and gender (25). TC Ko et al., concluded that for every decade of increase in age, there was a 0.15 mmol/L increase in fasting and random plasma glucose level and 0.26 mmol/L increase in 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose level.

Similar to the present study, Kutty VR et al., reported lower plasma glucose levels in the young age group and higher plasma glucose level in the old age group (24). TC Ko et al., has opined that increase of plasma glucose with an increasing age is multifactorial. They have added that the age could affect the glycaemic index values of foods. However, Wolever TM et al., have concluded that the glycaemic index for lentils was not affected by age (27). Chang AM and Halter JB stated that Insulin levels have been reported to be decreased with advancing age (28).

Further, insulin sensitivity has been reported to decrease with age explained by Basu R et al., (29). Lee ZS et al., has opined that an increase in other stress hormones, such as plasma cortisol, may also play a role in the age-associated hyperglycaemia (30).

Likewise, based on Canadian health survey, Adeli K et al., has concluded there are fluctuations in biochemical markers over a wide age range, its understanding provides important insight into biological processes and clinical application as establishment of robust paediatric and adult reference intervals of biochemical markers to monitor manifestation of various disease states is essential for patient care (31).

Limitation(s)

The limitation of the present study was the small sample size, so the results can not be generalised to whole population. A larger multicentric study would help derive a robust reference interval.

Conclusion

The reference range for fasting plasma glucose found to be on lower side in Ambalappuha compared to that of western population. Present study also demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the reference range established between male and female. However, there was significant difference in mean FPG in age group of 30-39 years and 50-59 years in same population. Further, it accentuates, the need for every laboratory to establish their own reference intervals for making laboratory reports more valuable in making clinical decision.

References

1.
Utah Governor Huntsman recognizes medical laboratory week. Clinical Lab Products. Issue Stories. May 2006. http://www.clpmag.com/issues/articles/2006- 05_03.asp.
2.
Ceriotti F. Prerequisites for use of common reference intervals. Clin Biochem Rev. 2007;28:115-21.
3.
Solberg H (on behalf of IFCC). Approved recommendation (1986) on the theory of reference values. Part 1 The concept of reference values. Clin Chim Acta. 1987;167:111-18. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Wayne PA. Defining, establishing and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory. Approved guideline. CLSI document C28-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Pennsylvania USA 2008, 3rd ed, Vol 28 No 30.
5.
Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023 Abridged for Primary Care Providers, American Diabetes Association. 2023;41(1):01-31. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Guidi GC, Salvagno GL. Reference intervals as a tool for total quality management. Biochemia Medica. 2010;20(2):165-72. [crossref]
7.
Farrell CJ, Nguyen L. Indirect reference intervals: Harnessing the power of stored laboratory data. The Clinical biochemist Reviews. 2019;40(2):99. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Horn PS, Feng L, Li Y, Pesce AJ. Effects of outliers and non-healthy individuals on reference interval estimation. Clin Chem. 2001;47:2137-45. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Tukey JW. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1977:688.
10.
Ferre-Masterrer M, Fuentes-Arderiu X, Puchal-Añe R. An indirect reference limit estimated from patients’ results by three mathematical procedures. Clinica Chemica Acta. 1999;279(1-2):97-105. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Mohammed O, Biranu E, Wolde M. Establishment of fasting blood glucose reference range in apparently health adult in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews. 2020;7(1):352-63.
12.
Bhuvanendranath H, Ronad SS, Kumar S. Reference range establishment for blood glucose and lipid profile in healthy adults. MedPulse International Journal of Biochemistry. 2018;5(3):77-80.
13.
Fiseha T, Alemayehu E, Mohammed Adem O, Eshetu B, Gebreweld A. Reference intervals for common clinical chemistry parameters in healthy adults of Northeast Ethiopia. Plos one. 2022;17(11):e0276825. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Castillo O, Woolcott OO, Gonzales E, Tello V, Tello L, Villarreal C, et al. Residents at high altitude show a lower glucose profile than sea-level residents throughout 12-hour blood continuous monitoring. High Alt Med Biol. 2007;8:307-11. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Brahmachari HD, Malhotra MS, Joseph S, Krishnan UR. Glucose tolerance at high altitude in man. Indian J Med Res. 1973;61:411-15.
16.
Haggstrom M. Establishment and clinical use of reference ranges. WikiJournal of Medicine. 2014;1(1):01-07. [crossref]
17.
Chhatriwala Mitul N, Sodavadiya Kiran Kumar B, Patel Dharmik S, Saiyad Taskin H. Establishment of reference interval of blood glucose and HbA1c in tertiary care hospital of Anand District. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2022;14(4):11-17.
18.
Lim E, Miyamura J, Chen JJ. Racial/ethnic-specific reference intervals for common laboratory tests: A comparison among Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and White. Hawai’i Journal of Medicine & Public Health. 2015;74(9):302-10.
19.
Malati T. Whether western normative laboratory values used for clinical diagnosis Journal of Clinical Biochemistry. 2009;24(2):111-22. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Khan FA, Dilawar M, Khan DA. Reference values of common blood chemistry analytes in healthy population of Rawalpindi-Islamabad area. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 1997;47:156-58.
21.
Waithaka SK, Njagi EN, Ngeranwa JJ, Mwangi DM, Chiuri BM, Njagi LJ, et al. Quantitative reference ranges for fasting profiles and oral glucose tolerance test for healthy adults in metropolitan region of Nairobi, Kenya. International Journal of Health Research. 2010;3(1):13-19. [crossref]
22.
Cheneke W, Demie T, Getachew A, Bekele S, Eskinder K, Sahlemariam Z, et al. Reference interval for clinical chemistry test parameters from apparently healthy individuals in Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Lab Med. 2018;5(5):62-69.
23.
Soeters MR, Sauerwein HP, Groener JE, Aerts JM, Ackermans MT, Glatz JFC, et al. Gender-related differences in the metabolic response to fasting. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(9):3646-52. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Kutty VR, Soman CR, Joseph A, Kumar KV, Pisharody R. Random capillary blood sugar and coronary risk factors in a south Kerala population. J Cardiovasc Risk. 2002;9:361-67. Medline:12478206. [crossref]
25.
TC Ko, Wai HPS, Tang JSF. Effects of age on plasma glucose levels in non- diabetic Hong Kong Chinese. Gary Croat Med J. 2006;47:709-13.
26.
Shah SA, Ichihara K, Dherai AJ, Ashavaid TF. Reference intervals for 33 biochemical analytes in healthy Indian population: C-RIDL IFCC initiative. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2018;56(12):2093-103. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Wolever TM, Jenkins DJ, Collier GR, Ehrlich RM, Josse RG, Wong GS, et al. The glycaemic index: Effect of age in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res. 1988;7:71-74.
28.
Chang AM, Halter JB. Aging and insulin secretion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003;284:E7-12. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Basu R, Breda E, Oberg AL, Powell CC, Dalla Man C, Basu A, et al. Mechanisms of the age-associated deterioration in glucose tolerance: Contribution of alterations in insulin secretion, action, and clearance. Diabetes. 2003;52:1738-48. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Lee ZS, Chan JC, Yeung VT, Chow CC, Lau MS, Ko GT, et al. Plasma insulin, growth hormone, cortisol, and central obesity among young Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1450-57. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Adeli K, Higgins V, Nieuwesteeg M, Raizman JE, Cheng Y, Wong SL, et al. Biochemical marker reference values across pediatric, adult, and geriatric ages: Establishment of robust pediatric and adult reference intervals on the basis of the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Clin Chem. 2015;61(8):1049-62.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63055.17676

Date of Submission: Feb 03, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 27, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Mar 25, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: Funded by State Board for Medical Research SBMR, Kerala
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 08, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 03, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 14, 2023 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com