Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 174712

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : ZC33 - ZC36 Full Version

Comparison of Parallelism of Different Levels of Ala-Tragus Lines to Occlusal Plane in Dentate Subjects via Cephalometric Analysis: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/57933.17614
Manasvi Jamwal, Sanjeev Mittal, Urvashi Sukhija, Jeewan Bachan Dhindsa, Jaskirat Singh, Manini Monica

1. Postgraduate, Department of Prosthodontics Including Crown and Bridge, Maharishi Markendeshwar College of Dental Sciences and Research, Ambala, Haryana, India. 2. Professor, Department of Prosthodontics Including Crown and Bridge, Maharishi Markendeshwar College of Dental Sciences and Research, Ambala, Haryana, India. 3. Professor, Department of Prosthodontics Including Crown and Bridge, Maharishi Markendeshwar College of Dental Sciences and Research, Ambala, Haryana, India. 4. Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics Including Crown and Bridge, Maharishi Markendeshwar College of Dental Sciences and Research, Ambala, Haryana, India. 5. Reader, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, RKDF Dental College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. 6. Postgraduate, Department of Prosthodontics Including Crown and Bridge, Maharishi Markendeshwar College of Dental Sciences and Research, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Manasvi Jamwal,
Hostel 8, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Room No. 29, Ambala, Haryana, India.
E-mail: jamwal.manasvi@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: In prosthodontics, fabrication of Complete Denture (CD) is a challenging task because numerous factors have to be taken care of while rehabilitating the patients. The establishment of Occlusal Plane (OP) should be adaptable with the functional activity of the stomatognathic system.

Aim: To ascertain the parallelism of different levels of ala-tragus lines to the OP in class 1 occlusion among dentate subjects via cephalometric analysis.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Prosthodontics, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Dental Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, February 2020 to September 2021. A total of 100 subjects were included in the study which included 50 males and 50 females. The various cephalometric parameters traced were Sella (S), Gnathion (Gn), OP, Anterior Nasal Spine (ANS). Metallic balls were placed on the lower border of ala of nose and tragus which was divided into three parts: Superior (S), Middle (M), and Inferior (I). Lateral cephalograms were shot for all subjects. The data collected was tabulated for easy interpretation and subjected to statistical analysis using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), post-hoc test.

Results: The mean angular measurement of angle I was highest followed by angle OP, angle M and least in angle S in both males and females. The comparison of the mean angle S was found to be significant (p<0.001) when subjected to one way ANOVA test, there was non-significant difference observed between angle OP and Angle I in males (p-value 0.464), and Angle OP and Angle M in females (p-value 0.984).

Conclusion: Clinically, from the present cephalometric study it can be suggested that in males, the inferior point on the tragus and in females, the middle point on the tragus can be used to mark the Camper’s plane.

Keywords

Campers plane, Dentulous, Lateral cephalogram, Plane of occlusion

In today’s fast changing world, the demand for facial aesthetics and harmony has come to the forefront, thus increasing the desire of an individual for an improved smile and more aesthetically pleasing facial appearance along with all the customary functions, hence the vertical orientation and proportions play an extensive role in facial uniformity (1). In prosthodontics, fabrication of CD is quite an arduous task because numerous mechanical and biological factors have to be kept in mind while performing the rehabilitation procedures. For the best possible prognosis in completely edentulous patients, the occlusion should be established in such a way that it is adaptable with the functional activity of the stomatognathic system (2).

According to Kurth, “the horizontal OP is undoubtedly the most important single plane to be determined in CD” (3). Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-8 defines OP as “The average plane made by the incisal and occlusal surfaces of the teeth. Mostly, it constitutes the planar mean of the curvature of these surfaces but it is not a plane, the surface of wax occlusal rims contoured to guide in the arrangement of the denture teeth, a flat metallic plate used in arranging denture teeth” (4). The orientation of the OP anteriorly and posteriorly affects physiologic functions inside the oral cavity along with aesthetics. An adequate height and width of the OP is necessary for the adequate buccolingual exchange and control of food bolus, plus speech along with articulation, space which the tongue occupies and soft tissue support (5). Various publications suggest that the ala-tragus or Camper’s plane is parallel to OP but there is a certain level of controversy as to which point on the tragus can be used while marking this line (6).

The aim of this study was to determine the parallelism of different levels of ala-tragus lines to the OP in class 1 occlusion using various tragus markings i.e., inferior, middle and superior.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Prosthodontics including crown and bridge, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Dental Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, February 2020 to September 2021. This study was approved by the Institutional Research Committee and Institutional Ethical Committee (Project No. 1569, dated 14.12.2019).

Total of 100 dentate subjects, 50 males and 50 females were included in the study according to following inclusion and exclusion criteria using OpenEpi software version 3.

Inclusion criteria: Subject’s having a full complement of permanent dentition (excluding 3rd molars), subjects with angle’s class 1 molar relationship, subjects in age group of 18-30 years.

Exclusion criteria: Conditions with loss of tooth structure like attrition, periodontal disease etc., history of Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) disorders, large scale restorations like bridges (which included more than four units) in the maxillary/mandibular posterior arch, any history of ongoing or previous Orthodontic treatment, any congenital facial defects and facial asymmetries.

Study Procedure

On every subject, digital vernier calliper was used to measure the exact length of the tragus. Three points were marked on the tragus, the superior, middle and inferior using an indelible pencil, lower border of the ala of the nose was also marked. The radiopaque markers/metallic balls having a diameter of 1 mm were adhered to these markings using double sided tape, so that these points were radiopaque and visible on the radiograph (Table/Fig 1). For the sake of uniformity, right side of the subject’s face was chosen while making the markings. Subjects were then positioned in cephalostat (Lateral cephalogram X-ray unit), a standard distance of five feet was kept between the X-ray target and mid sagittal plane of the head. Lateral cephalograms were taken by a standard technique with the mandible closed in maximum intercuspation. Processing was done using an automatic processor. After developing, the cephalograms were visualised on an X-ray viewer and traced using acetate films (Table/Fig 2).

Procedure for evaluation of occlusal plane parallelism with Campers plane:

The anatomical points used in the cephalograms were:

• Sella (S) was marked from the deepest point in the middle of the sella tursica contour.
• Gnathion (Gn) was marked as the lowest point on the anterior margin of the lower jaw in the mid-sagittal plane.
• Mid-incisal point of the maxillary central incisors to the mesio- palatal cusp of the maxillary first molar was the anatomical landmarks used to mark the OP.
• Superior (S), middle (M) and inferior (I) points were traced on the tragus.

(1) Cephalometric planes

• Plane of occlusion: was traced as a line extending from the mid-incisal point of the maxillary central incisors to the mesio-palatal cusp of the maxillary first molar.
• Camper plane S- was marked as a line joining lower border of ala of the nose to superior border of tragus.
• Camper plane M- was marked as a line joining lower border of ala of the nose to middle border of tragus
• Camper plane I- was marked as a line joining lower border of ala of the nose to inferior border of tragus
• S-Gn plane- was marked as a plane joining anatomical point Sella to Gnathion. The protractor was kept on the S-Gn plane intersecting the OP and the angles were marked (2).

(2) Cephalometric angles

• Camper’s plane angle S- is formed when S-Gn plane intersects Camper’s plane S
• Camper’s plane angle M- is formed when S-Gn plane intersects Camper’s plane M
• Camper’s plane angle I- is formed when S-Gn plane intersects Camper’s plane I
• Angle OP- is formed when S-Gn plane intersects OP (2).

Statistical Analysis

The data collected was tabulated for easy interpretation and subjected to statistical analysis using ANOVA, post-hoc test using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software.

Results

The sample size comprising of 50 males and 50 females had a mean (standard deviation) age: 23.91(6.23) years. The mean angular measurement of angle I was highest followed by angle OP, angle M and least in angle S in both males and females (Table/Fig 3).

The comparison of the mean angles was found to be significant (p<0.001) when subjected to one way ANOVA test (Table/Fig 4). In order to find to find out which angle is not significantly different from angle OP, multiple comparison (post-hoc) were carried out test using Bonferroni Tukey’s method. From multiple comparison table (Table/Fig 5), present study showed that in males, there was a significant difference between angle OP and angle S, angle M. however, difference was insignificant (p-value 0.464) between angle OP and angle I. Therefore, present study concluded that angle I is nearest to angle OP.

Similarly, in females, there was no significant difference (P. 984) observed only between angle OP and angle M, therefore angle M is nearest to angle OP (Table/Fig 3).

Discussion

In the present study, it was seen that for males, the inferior point, whereas, for females, the middle point on the tragus was the most accurate point for marking ala-tragus line for establishing OP. Since, time immemorial, prosthodontists have always faced different challenges during the fabrication of CD in order to meet the physiological, esthetic and functional needs of various patients. The process of rehabilitating completely edentulous patients involves establishing the plane of occlusion and vertical dimension which is an important determinant that helps in the prognosis of a case (6),(7),(8),(9).

In CD, the proper height of the OP is very important as it helps the dentures to be functionally and esthetically acceptable to patients. In the anterior region, it helps in proper phonetics and better esthetics, whereas in the posterior region it forms a surface to chew on. Any differences in OP can disturb the harmony between tongue, buccinator muscle and mandibular teeth (4). Although there are various guidelines used to establish the plane of occlusion, ala-tragus seems to be the most commonly used. Various studies [4,7,10,11] have shown that the tragus can be divided into three points/parts that is the superior, middle and inferior which can be used to further establish the OP. For this, various methods intraoral and extraoral have been proposed by different authors [2,6]. The retromolar pad area, parotid papillae, buccinator groove, Hamular notch Incisive Plane (HIP), commissure of lips are included under intraoral landmarks or planes. The accuracy of these landmarks based on their location and identification intraorally is still controversial.

It has been found that the Camper’s plane is most frequently used to locate the posterior OP and interpupillary line is also most frequently used to establish the anterior OP (3). Nissan J et al., Sadr K et al., Gupta R et al., Rajawat I et al., have advocated the use of superior border of tragus as a specification to mark the ala-tragus line [12-15]. Shigli K et al., Bondekar V et al., Abi-Ghosn C et al., have suggested using the middle part of the tragus as a reference for marking ala-tragus line [10,16,17]; whereas Karkazis HC et al., Rostamkhani F et al., Chaturvedi S et al., Kumar S et al., Shetty S et al., have advocated that the inferior border of tragus should be used as a posterior reference point to establish the ala-tragus line [18-22]. For this study right lateral cephalograms were used to study the relationship between the three camper planes and OP. These lateral cephalograms were a standardised modality for all subjects as they helped us to study the relationship between different cranial reference planes plus it was a better method of determining the OP in comparison to digital photographs [7,11,23-24].

Angular measurements are used in cephalometric analysis which are relatively reliable over years and are less affected by age. They can give us valuable information about the orientation of OP in dentulous and edentulous subjects (25). It was seen that angle S, M and I were significantly higher in females as compared to males, angle OP was not found to be significantly different across gender, when compared using independent t test. On the other hand, angle S, M and I were higher in males as compared to females in a study by Chaturvedi S et al., (20).

In males, on comparing angle OP with angle S, M and I, insignificant difference was observed between angle OP and I which means inferior point marked on tragus is the most appropriate point for marking ala-tragus line. The results of the present study for males are in agreement with studies done by, Karkazis HC et al., Rostamkhani F et al., Chaturvedi S et al., Kumar S et al., Shetty S et al., who found that OP in dentulous subjects was parallel to the line drawn from ala of the nose to inferior border of tragus [18-22]. In females, on comparing angle OP with angle S, M and I, insignificant difference is observed between angle OP and M. Results of the present study for females are in agreement with studies conducted by Shigli K et al., Bondekar V et al., and Abi-Ghosn C et al., who advocated using the middle part of tragus as a reference point for marking the ala-tragus line [10,16,17]. Gandhi N et al., conducted a study in 100 subjects where it was found that the inferior point on tragus was the most accurate point for marking ala-tragus line (25). In contradiction to the present study, Chaturvedi S et al., and Kumar S et al., advocated that there was no significant influence of sex for the determination of the OP as difference in sex does not cause any discrepancies in the angular relationship between FH plane and ala-tragus line as well as the OP and ala-tragus line [20,21].

Limitation(s)

Notable limitations of the current study are that the effect of age on the ala of nose and tragus was not considered as it could have an effect on the orientation of OP in elderly edentulous subjects. Also, the present study included subjects with class I malocclusion only, so its use is limited in class II and class III subjects. Examination of only two dimensions of face was carried out in the lateral cephalograms; clinical information and soft tissue dimensions were not included. All of these factors can be researched on in the upcoming years.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of the present study, it was concluded that in males, the inferior point, whereas, in females, the middle point on the tragus is the most accurate point for marking ala-tragus line for establishing OP. Cephalometric analysis can be used as a reference to understand the direction of the treatment planning.

References

1.
Maskey S, Shrestha R. Cephalometric approach to vertical facial height. Orthod J Nepal. 2019;9(1):54-58. [crossref]
2.
Venugopalan S, Satishbabu C, Rani M. Determination of the relative parallelism of occlusal plane to three ala-tragal lines in various skeletal malocclusions: A cephalometric study. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23(6):719-25. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Kurth LE. Posterior occlusal plane in full denture construction. J Am Dent Assoc. 1940;27:85-93. [crossref]
4.
GPT-8 Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms, Edition 8, J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:01-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Allen LR. Improved phonetics in denture construction. J Prosthet Dent. 1958;8:753-63. [crossref]
6.
Monteith BD. A cephalometric method to determine the angulation of the occlusal plane in edentulous subjects. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54:81-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Hartono R. The occlusal plane in relation to facial types. J Prosthet Dent. 1967;17(6):549-58. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Bassi F, Deregibus A, Previgliano V, Bracco P, Preti G. Evaluation of the utility of cephalometric parameters in constructing complete denture. Part I: Placement of posterior teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28(3):234-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Çiftçi Y, Kocadereli I, Canay S¸ , S¸ enyilmaz P. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillomandibular relationships in patients wearing complete dentures: A pilot study. Angle Orthod. 2004;75(5):821-25.
10.
Shigli K, Chetal BR, Jabade J. Validity of soft tissue landmarks in determining the occlusal plane. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2005;5(3):139. [crossref]
11.
Ogawa T, Koyano K, Suetsugu T. Characteristics of masticatory movement in relation to inclination of occlusal plane. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24(9):652-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Nissan J, Barnea E, Zeltzer C, Cardash HS. Relationship between occlusal plane determinants and craniofacial structures. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(6):587-91. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Sadr K, Sadr M. A study of parallelism of the occlusal plane and ala-tragus line. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2009;3(4):107.
14.
Gupta R, Aeran H, Singh SP. Relationship of anatomic landmarks with occlusal plane. J Indian Prosthodontic Soc. 2009;9(3):142. [crossref]
15.
Rajawat I, Venkataramana V, Patil P, Guram G, Gupta N, Lau M, et al. A cephalometric evaluation for co-relation of different facial types with occlusal plane in dentulous and edentulous patients. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014;13(4):1188-91.
16.
Bondekar V, Wagh SB, Attal PN, Pandey VR. Evaluation of relation between occlusal plane and ala-tragus line with the help of cephalometry. J Adv Med Dent Scie Res. 2015;3(6):S43.
17.
Abi-Ghosn C, Zogheib C, Younes R, Makzoumé JE. The ala-tragus line as a guide for orientation of the occlusal plane in complete dentures. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014;15(1):108. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Karkazis HC, Polyzois GL. Cephalometrically predicted occlusal plane: Implications in removable prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65(2):258-64. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Rostamkhani F, Sahafian A, Kermani H. A cephalometric study on the relationship between the occlusal plane, ala-tragus and Camper’s lines, in patients with Angle’s class III malocclusion. Front Dent. 2005;2(2):46-49.
20.
Chaturvedi S, Thombare R. Cephalometrically assessing the validity of superior, middle and inferior tragus points on ala-tragus line while establishing the occlusal plane in edentulous patient. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5(1):58-66. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Kumar S, Garg S, Gupta S. A determination of occlusal plane comparing different levels of the tragus to form ala-tragal line or Camper’s line: A photographic study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5(1):09-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Shetty S, Shenoy KK, Ninan J, Mahaseth P. An evaluation of relation between the relative parallelism of occlusal plane to ala-tragal line and variation in the angulation of Po-Na-ANS angle in dentulous subjects: A cephalometric study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015;15(2):168. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Sinobad D. The position of the occlusal plane in dentulous subjects with various skeletal jaw-relationships. J Oral Rehabil. 1988;15(5):489-98.[crossref] [PubMed]
24.
D’Souza NL, Bhargava K. A cephalometric study comparing the occlusal plane in dentulous and edentulous subjects in relation to the maxillomandibular space. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75(2):177-82. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Gandhi N, Daniel S, Kurian N. Cephalometric study of the position of ala-tragus line in relation to Frankfort horizontal plane and occlusal plane among Ludhiana population. Indian J Dent Sci. 2017;9(3):165-69.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/57933.17614

Date of Submission: Sep 04, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Oct 17, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Dec 09, 2022
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Ye

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 05, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 15, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Dec 08, 2022 (19%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com