Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 65590

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : VE01 - VE06 Full Version

Cognition and Functional Recovery in Severe Mental Disorders-A Narrative Review


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59557.17638
J Jane Rinita, Suvarna Jyothi Kantipudi

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Psychiatry, SRIHER, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, SRIHER, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Suvarna Jyothi Kantipudi,
F-30, Staff Quarters, SRMC College Campus, Porur, Chennai-600116, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: suvarna.srmc@gmail.com

Abstract

Severe Mental Illness (SMI) like schizophrenia and mood disorders has a prolonged and strenuous course which takes a major toll on the lives of the patients. In an effort to understand the consequence of these illness functional recovery has been studied in detail in the past. Cognitive impairment has been identified as an important contributor to the functional recovery. Cognitive impairment is an important component, independent of the symptoms, of SMI. Various cognitive deficits are found to occur in patients with SMI. Patients with lesser cognitive deficits were found to have better outcomes. This narrative review explains about cognitive impairment and functional outcome in people with SMI and the existing evidence for the relationship between both. Authors had performed manual search strategy of PubMed, Google Scholar engines for relevant research publications and reviewed them along with cross references from the retrieved articles. A broad review on the research shows, cognitive impairment has been recognised in both patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder even during periods of symptomatic remission and that people with symptomatic recovery continued to have functional deficits. This review also showed that patient with lesser cognitive deficits had better outcomes. Keeping this in mind, cognitive rehabilitation should be made a part of the management of SMI to achieve complete functional recovery.

Keywords

Neurocognition, Psychiatric disorders, Remission

The Severe Mental Illness (SMI) in psychiatry involves a range of mental illnesses, of which psychotic disorders and mood disorders form a major part (1). People with SMI experience many obstacles on their path to recovery leading to lifelong disability and functional impairment (2). Recovery in SMI is a dynamic concept, which contributes significantly to societal and economic burden, when disrupted. Recovery is no longer seen as clinical improvement alone, but as a holistic approach, where the aim is to help individuals with SMI live independently and reintegrate into the society. Un-remitting symptoms, treatment failure, co-existing medical illness, cognitive deficits, lack of insight, lack of psychosocial support are some of the factors contributing to the disability (3). The role of cognition in recovery has made it a key area of focus in psychiatric conditions. Impairment in cognition has been found to occur in SMI like schizophrenia and mood disorders. While looking at cognition in SMI, a number of factors relating to the symptoms, prognosis and management have come to light. A review of previous literature on the role of cognition in SMI, concept of functional recovery in SMI and the relationship between cognitive impairment and functional recovery has been presented in this article.

Literature search: Manual search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar and other relevant publications were reviewed by the authors. The search terms used in PubMed were cognitive impairment AND schizophrenia OR Bipolar disorder, Functional recovery AND schizophrenia OR Bipolar disorder. Obtained articles were filtered based on the title and abstract by searching the electronic databases. Around 200 articles were retrieved based on clinical relevance and cross reference from the articles. A total of 69 articles were reviewed by both the authors (Table/Fig 1).

What is Cognition?

Cognition in essence refers to acquiring, understanding, and processing of information (4). It entails many conscious (as well as unconscious) mental activities like attention, working memory, execution, learning, problem solving, judgement, insight, etc., (5). Many of the cognitive functions are unique to the human species (6). The neural correlation of cognition is attributed to the sustained firing of neurons in the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) (7). Functional imaging studies have made it possible to understand how certain cognitive functions are related to specific regions of the cerebral cortex (6). Cognition is a highly complex ensemble of activities which interacts with affective domain as well. The state of cognition influences emotional well-being and similarly affective changes do influence the cognitive status (6),(8).

Assessment of cognition: Evaluation of cognitive functions is essential to identify the domains affected and the cortical regions involved in the disorder causing cognitive disturbances. Many tools have been introduced over the years to screen for cognitive impairment (9).

Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE): MMSE is a widely used tool for cognitive assessment by clinicians. It can be administered in <10 minutes and it is scored out of 30. It tests attention, orientation, verbal fluency, memory, abstraction. Lesser weightage is given testing visuospatial skills (10).

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): MoCA is scored out of 30, and it tests visuospatial skills, executive function, memory, verbal fluency, attention, abstraction. MoCA has a higher sensitivity in detecting MCI (11).

Adden brooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE) III: ACE-III covers a wide range of cognitive domains including attention, calculation, executive functions, verbal fluency, language, memory. It is scored out of 100 and a score of 88 is the cut-off. It takes about 20-30 minutes more than other screening tools (12).

Various neuropsychological tests are used to assess individual domains of cognition (Table/Fig 2) (13),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22),(23).

Cognition in Severe Mental Illness (SMI)

Cognitive impairment is a term used to describe abnormalities in any of the multiple domains of cognition (5). Some areas of cognitive impairment present in SMI range from inattention, difficulty in concentrating, working memory deficits, visuospatial deficits etc., (6). Cognitive deficits have been identified in schizophrenia, even before the onset of psychotic symptoms (24). Moderate to severe impairments have been found to co-occur during the first episode of psychosis (24). Impairment in attention, verbal learning and memory, verbal fluency, executive function has been identified in schizophrenia (5). Over the years, researchers have determined that cognitive deficits persisted in individuals with schizophrenia who were in remission (25). Research has confirmed that after statistical adjustment for Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) and IQ scores, patients with schizophrenia continued to have cognitive deficits (26). Recent studies have also shown cognitive impairment in patients with bipolar disorder, particularly in the areas of attention, executive function, and verbal memory during remission (5),(27). The severity of cognitive impairment correlates with number and severity of the episodes (27).

While looking at why cognitive deficits in SMI are important, authors come to understand that cognitive impairment plays an important role in determining the functional outcome of SMI making it an important component of treatment.

The Road to Recovery

What functional recovery means has been a sector of active research over many years. According to various researchers, psychosocial well-being has been explained as independence and living a meaningful life (28). Independence in terms of taking charge of their personal needs of daily living, medications, and their finance (28). Additionally, being able to find a job or return to work and receive remuneration for their work is also a part of psychosocial well-being. A person who has recovered from a psychiatric illness should be in a position to effectively communicate with others, live as a part of a family, integrate into community and fulfill their age appropriate role in the society with the least impact of the illness on the patient, the family and the community (26),(29).

Investigations into the details of what hampers functional recovery in patients with SMI, a multifold of elements have come into light (30). Environmental agents, history of substance use, familial support have been found to have a role in predicting functional recovery (31),(32). However, neurocognition, negative symptoms and personalised stigma towards the illness have stood out among the determinants (33).

Functional Recovery in Severe Mental Illness (SMI)

My whole mental power has disappeared, I have sunk intellectually below the level of a beast” (a patient with schizophrenia, quoted by Kraepelin, 1919, p. 25) (34).

Schizophrenia is a complex and SMI which is chronic, heterogeneous, and incapacitating. The remission in Schizophrenia Working Group defined symptomatic remission in schizophrenia as “the state in which the patient shows improvement in signs and symptoms, to such an extent that they do not interfere significantly in their behavior, and they are below the diagnostic threshold” (35). Advances in therapeutic approaches have made it possible today to help patients with schizophrenia achieve symptomatic remission (36). Nevertheless, schizophrenia remains to be one of the top 10 causes of disability and causes a high degree of global burden, making functional recovery an important area to be addressed in the future (29).

Functional recovery in schizophrenia is a multi-dimensional theory which entails personal, social, interpersonal, occupational domains (36). Studies have found that the patients with schizophrenia have difficulty in acquiring and maintaining jobs, establishing social relationships, and living independently [24,37,38]. Bipolar disorder was initially thought to be an episodic illness with inter-episodic premorbid level functioning. However, recent studies have shown that patients with bipolar disorder do not achieve their premorbid psychosocial functioning even during remission (39),(40),(41). Bipolar disorder patients continue have deficits in various domains of functional recovery.

Assessment of Functional Impairment

Several tools are used worldwide to assess functional impairment. The commonly used tools are:

WHO Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS) 2.0 (42): WHO Disability Assessment Scale 2.0 is a reliable instrument developed by World Health Organisation (WHO) that can be used across cultures to assess disability. There are 2 versions, a self-administered 36 item score and a shorter 12 item version that can be administered in 5 minutes. It covers six domains, and each domain is scored between 0 and 4 (42).

Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale (IDEAS) (43): The Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale (IDEAS) were introduced by Indian Psychiatric Society in 2001. Self-care, interpersonal activities, communication, and work are the 4 areas assessed in IDEAS. Each area is scored between 0 and 4 (43).

Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) (44): GAF scale was developed to rate Axis 5 of DSM 4. It is a 100-point scale that is rated by clinicians. Significant weightage is given to symptoms in GAF, which can lead to biases in scoring. Individuals with persistent symptoms might score lesser despite good functioning (44).

WHO Quality of Life (WHOQOL) (45): WHO has developed WHOQOL to assess the quality of life. This instrument helps to capture many subjective aspects of quality of life among patients. 2 versions WHOQOL 100 and WHOQOL BREF are available. WHOQOL 100 gives scores of individual facets (positive feelings, support etc.,) while WHODAS BREF gives scores of the domains (psychological, social, and physical) (45),(46).

Social and Occupational Functioning Scale (SOFAS) (47): SOFAS was designed to rate Axis 5 of DSM 4. It is scored between 0-100, lower scores denote lower level of functioning. It differs from GAF by focusing on functioning rather than individual symptoms (47),(48).

Relationship between Cognitive Deficits and Functional Outcome

Multiple studies have proved that patients with schizophrenia had deficits in cognitive domains that have translated to disabilities in life activities and participation (49)[,50]. Association between verbal memory and living either independently or in a community has been found (51). Deficits in language, visuospatial ability, verbal memory has been associated with performing activities of daily living (51). Associations between attention and performing life skills and work performance have been identified (51). Similarly, patients with bipolar affective disorders during their euthymic states continued to live with occupational and social impairment (52). The neurocognitive domains affected in patients with bipolar disorders during euthymic phase includes impairments in executive functions, attention deficits, working memory (52),(53). Research has shown associations between psychosocial functioning and verbal memory, attention deficits as well (38). The (Table/Fig 3) below summarises the findings of different studies involving cognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia and bipolar patients in the last two decades (54),(55),(56),(57),(58),(59),(60),(61),(62),(63),(64),(65),(66),(67).

With this in mind, cognitive remediation therapy has become a focus of patient rehabilitation. Cognitive remediation therapy has been defined as “a behavioral training-based intervention that aims to improve cognitive processes (attention, memory, executive function, social cognition, or metacognition) with the goal of durability and generalisation” (68). It uses simple tasks and exercises that were found to have a huge effect in improving cognitive functions in people with mental illness (69).

Conclusion

A high proportion of patients with SMI have persisting disability and poor quality of life. This is a matter of concern, as it adds significantly to the global burden. From review of research, it can be understood that people with SMI continue to have cognitive deficits inspite of symptomatic recovery. And the significant role of cognitive impairment in the functional recovery of patients with SMI like schizophrenia and bipolar disorder has been identified. Consequently, it can be concluded that targeting cognitive enhancement will go a long way in the rehabilitation and reintegration of patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorders into the society.

References

1.
Johnson DL. Overview of severe mental illness. Clin Psychol Rev. 1997;17:247-57. Availble from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00017-2. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Viron MJ, Stern TA. The impact of serious mental illness on health and healthcare. Psychosomatics. 2010;51:458-65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(10)70737-4. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Berghöfer A, Martin L, Hense S, Weinmann S, Roll S. Quality of life in patients with severe mental illness: A cross-sectional survey in an integrated outpatient health care model. Quality of Life Research. 2020;29:2073-87. Availble from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02470-0. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Dhakal A, Bobrin BD. Cognitive Deficits. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.
5.
Millan MJ, Agid Y, Brüne M, Bullmore ET, Carter CS, Clayton NS, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders: Characteristics, causes and the quest for improved therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:141-68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3628. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Pessoa L. On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:148-58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2317. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Fuster JM, Alexander GE. Neuron activity related to short-term memory. Science. 1971;173:652-54. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.173.3997.652. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Harmer CJ, O’Sullivan U, Favaron E, Massey-Chase R, Ayres R, Reinecke A, et al. Effect of acute antidepressant administration on negative affective bias in depressed patients. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:1178-84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09020149. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Gonzalez Kelso I, Tadi P. Cognitive Assessment. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.
10.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:695-99. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Hsieh S, Schubert S, Hoon C, Mioshi E, Hodges JR. Validation of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III in Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013;36:242-50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1159/000351671. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Kaplan E, Googlass H, Weintraub S. Boston Naming Test (2nd edit.) Philadelphia. Estados Unidos: Lea y Febiger; 1983.
14.
Benton AL, Hamsher K, Sivan AB. Multilingual Aphasia Examination. 3rd ed. Iowa City, IA: AJA Associates; 1994.
15.
Hodges JR. Cognitive Assessment for Clinicians. 2nd ed. NY: OUP Oxford; 2007.
16.
Bechara A, Damasio AR, Damasio H, Anderson SW. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition. 1994;50(1-3):07-15. Availble from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Berg EA. A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. J Gen Psychol. 1948;39:15-22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1948.9918159. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Scorpio KA, Islam R, Kim SM, Bind R, Borod JC, Bender HA. Paired-associate learning. Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1137. [crossref]
19.
Bean J. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Rey AVLT. Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, New York, NY: Springer New York; 2011. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_1153. [crossref]
20.
Buschke H. Cued recall in Amnesia. J Clin Neuropsychol. 1984;6(4):433-40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638408401233. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Wambach D, Lamar M, Swenson R, Penney DL, Kaplan E, Libon DJ. Digit Span. Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, New York, NY: Springer New York; 2011. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_1288. [crossref]
22.
Huettel SA, McCarthy G. What is odd in the oddball task? Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(3):379-86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.07.009. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
McDonald S, Flanagan S, Rollins J, Kinch J. TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2003;18(3):219-38. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200305000-00001. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Bowie CR, Harvey PD. Cognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2006;2:531-36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/nedt.2006.2.4.531. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Kalkstein S, Hurford I, Gur RC. Neurocognition in Schizophrenia. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2010;4:373-90. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2010_42. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Keefe RSE, Poe M, Walker TM, Harvey PD. The relationship of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) to functional capacity and real-world functional outcome. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006;28:260-69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390500360539. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Carvalho AF, Bortolato B, Miskowiak K, Vieta E, Köhler C. Cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;17:3111-25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S76700. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Yildiz M. Recovery as a process in severe mental illnesses. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2015;52:01-03. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5152/npa.2015.0120148. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Kwakernaak S, Swildens WE, Tom, van Wel F, Richard, Janssen TJM. Symptomatic and functional remission in young adults with a psychotic disorder in a rehabilitation focused team. Community Ment Health J. 2020;56:549-58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00512-7. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Torrey Fuller E. Surviving schizophrenia: A manual for families, consumers, and providers. 4th ed. New York: Quill; 2001.
31.
Albert N, Bertelsen M, Thorup A, Petersen L, Jeppesen P, le Quack P, et al. Predictors of recovery from psychosis analyses of clinical and social factors associated with recovery among patients with first-episode psychosis after 5 years. Schizophr Res. 2011;125:257-66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCHRES.2010.10.013. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Lambert M, Karow A, Leucht S, Schimmelmann BG, Naber D. Remission in schizophrenia: Validity, frequency, predictors, and patients’ perspective 5 years later. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2010;12:393. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2010.12.3/MLAMBERT. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Cella M, Edwards C, Wykes T. A question of time: A study of time use in people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2016;176:480-84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCHRES.2016.06.033. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
O’Carroll R. Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment. 2000;6:161-68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.6.3.161. [crossref]
35.
Andreasen NC, Carpenter WT, Kane JM, Lasser RA, Marder SR, Weinberger DR. Remission in schizophrenia: Proposed criteria and rationale for consensus. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:441-49. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.441. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Silva MA, Restrepo D. Functional recovery in schizophrenia. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria (English Ed) n.d.; 48:252-60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcp.2017.08.004. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Harvey PD. Functional recovery in schizophrenia: Raising the bar for outcomes in people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:299. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbn186. [crossref] [PubMed]
38.
Green MF. Cognitive impairment and functional outcome in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(Suppl 9):03-08. [crossref]
39.
Gilbert E, Marwaha S. Predictors of employment in bipolar disorder: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2013;145:156-64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.07.009. [crossref] [PubMed]
40.
Bonnín CM, Sánchez-Moreno J, Martínez-Arán A, Solé B, Reinares M, Rosa AR, et al. Subthreshold symptoms in bipolar disorder: Impact on neurocognition, quality of life and disability. J Affect Disord. 2012;136:650-59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.012. [crossref] [PubMed]
41.
Volkert J, Kopf J, Kazmaier J, Glaser F, Zierhut KC, Schiele MA, et al. Evidence for cognitive subgroups in bipolar disorder and the influence of subclinical depression and sleep disturbances. European Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;25:192-202. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.07.017. [crossref] [PubMed]
42.
Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, Kennedy C, Epping-Jordan J, et al. Developing the World Health Organisation disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:815-23. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.09.067231. [crossref] [PubMed]
43.
Thara R. IDEAS (Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale)—a scale for measuring and quantifying disability in mental disorders. India: The Indian Psychiatric Society; 2002.
44.
Aas IM. Guidelines for rating Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2011;10:2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-10-2. [crossref] [PubMed]
45.
The Whoqol Group. The World Health Organisation quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998;46:1569-85. Availble from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4. [crossref] [PubMed]
46.
THE WHOQOL GROUP TW. Development of the World Health Organisation WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28:551-58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798006667. [crossref] [PubMed]
47.
Saraswat N, Rao K, Subbakrishna DK, Gangadhar BN. The Social Occupational Functioning Scale (SOFS): A brief measure of functional status in persons with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2006;81(2-3):301-09. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2005.09.008. [crossref] [PubMed]
48.
Rybarczyk B. Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). In: Kreutzer Jeffrey S. and DeLuca J and CB, editor. Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, New York, NY: Springer New York; 2011, Pp. 2313. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_428. [crossref]
49.
Corigliano V, de Carolis A, Trovini G, Dehning J, di Pietro S, Curto M, et al. Neurocognition in schizophrenia: From prodrome to multi-episode illness. Psychiatry Res. 2014;220:129-34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYCHRES.2014.07.067. [crossref] [PubMed]
50.
Malla A. The role of cognition in outcome in schizophrenia and related disorders. Can J Psychiatry. 2014;59:03-04. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371405900102.[crossref] [PubMed]
52.
Rajji TK, Miranda D, Mulsant BH. Cognition, function, and disability in patients with schizophrenia: A review of longitudinal studies. Can J Psychiatry. 2014;59:13-17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371405900104. [crossref] [PubMed]
52.
Bourin M. Cognitive impact in bipolar disorder. Arch Depress Anxiety. 2019;5(2):052-058. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5460.000042. [crossref]
53.
Vöhringer PA, Barroilhet SA, Amerio A, Reale ML, Alvear K, Vergne D, et al. Cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: A systematic review. Front Psychiatry. 2013;4:87. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYT.2013.00087. [crossref] [PubMed]
54.
Huang YC, Lee Y, Lee CY, Lin PY, Hung CF, Lee SY, et al. Defining cognitive and functional profiles in schizophrenia and affective disorders. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):39. Availble from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-2459-y. [crossref] [PubMed]
55.
Valencia M, Fresán A, Barak Y, Juárez F, Escamilla R, Saracco R. Predicting functional remission in patients with schizophrenia: A cross-sectional study of symptomatic remission, psychosocial remission, functioning, and clinical outcome. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:2339-48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S87335. [crossref] [PubMed]
56.
Jain M, Singh S, Dalal P, Nischal A, Tripathi A, Kar S. A cross-sectional study of cognitive functions and disability in schizophrenia from a tertiary care hospital inxs North India. Medical Journal of Dr DY Patil University. 2016;9:457-64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-2870.186056. [crossref]
57.
Santosh S, Dutta Roy D, Kundu PS. Psychopathology, cognitive function, and social functioning of patients with schizophrenia. East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2013;23:65-70.
58.
Krishnadas R, Moore BP, Nayak A, Patel RR. Relationship of cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia in remission to disability: A cross-sectional study in an Indian sample. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2007;6:19. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1186/1744-859X-6-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
59.
Jiménez-López E, Sánchez-Morla EM, López-Villarreal A, Aparicio AI, Martínez- Vizcaíno V, Vieta E, et al. Neurocognition and functional outcome in patients with psychotic, non-psychotic bipolar I disorder, and schizophrenia. A five-year follow-up. Eur Psychiatry. 2019;56:60-68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/J. EURPSY.2018.11.008. [crossref] [PubMed]
60.
Norlin Bagge E, Esbjörnsson E, Sunnerhagen KS. Cognitive screening and behavioural observation of functional ability in patients with multiple episode schizophrenia: An exploratory study. BMJ Open 2017;7(6):e014783. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014783. [crossref] [PubMed]
61.
Joseph J, Kremen WS, Franz CE, Glatt SJ, van de Leemput J, Chandler SD, et al. Predictors of current functioning and functional decline in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2017;188:158-64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/J. SCHRES.2017.01.038. [crossref] [PubMed]
62.
Leifker FR, Bowie CR, Harvey PD. Determinants of everyday outcomes in schizophrenia: The influences of cognitive impairment, functional capacity, and symptoms. Schizophr Res. 2009;115:82-87. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/J.SCHRES.2009.09.004. [crossref] [PubMed]
63.
Zhu Y, Womer FY, Leng H, Chang M, Yin Z, Wei Y, et al. The relationship between cognitive dysfunction and symptom dimensions across schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:253. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00253. [crossref] [PubMed]
64.
Altshuler LL, Bearden CE, Green MF, van Gorp W, Mintz J. A relationship between neurocognitive impairment and functional impairment in bipolar disorder: A pilot study. Psychiatry Res. 2008;157:289-93. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYCHRES.2007.01.001. [crossref] [PubMed]
65.
Goswami U, Sharma A, Khastigir U, Ferrier IN, Young AH, Gallagher P, et al. Neuropsychological dysfunction, soft neurological signs and social disability in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;188:366-73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1192/BJP.188.4.366. [crossref] [PubMed]
66.
Deng M, Pan Y, Zhou L, Chen X, Liu C, Huang X, et al. Resilience and cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, and healthy controls. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:279. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyt.2018.00279. [crossref] [PubMed]
67.
Belvederi Murri M, Respino M, Proietti L, Bugliani M, Pereira B, D’Amico E, et al. Cognitive impairment in late life bipolar disorder: Risk factors and clinical outcomes. J Affect Disord. 2019;257:166-72. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/J.JAD.2019.07.052 [crossref] [PubMed]
68.
Benedict RHB, Harris AE, Markow T, McCormick JA, Nuechterlein KH, Asarnow RF. Effects of attention training on information processing in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1994;20:537-46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ schbul/20.3.537. [crossref] [PubMed]
69.
Medalia A, Aluma M, Tryon W, Merriam AE. Effectiveness of attention training in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1998;24:147-52. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033306.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59557.17638

Date of Submission: Aug 08, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Oct 06, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Nov 16, 2022
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 13, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 12, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Nov 08, 2022 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com