Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 217667

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : UC14 - UC17 Full Version

Effect of Hip/Shoulder Width Ratio on the Spread of Spinal Anaesthesia in Term Parturients: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60093.17586
V Vasantharajan, Nongthombam Ratan Singh, Takhelmayum Hemjit Singh, Lairikyengbam Sheityajit Singh, Bidya Ngangom, Antony Xavier

1. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal-West, Manipur, India. 2. Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal-West, Manipur, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal-West, Manipur, India. 4. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Anaesthesiology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal-West, Manipur, India. 5. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Anaesthesiology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal-West, Manipur, India. 6. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Anaesthesiology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal-West, Manipur, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Takhelmayum Hemjit Singh,
Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Lamphelpat, Imphal-795004, Manipur, India.
E-mail: takhelhem@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: There is increased cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia with similar dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine in parturients with greater hip width and shorter shoulder width.

Aim: To determine the effect of Hip and Shoulder width Ratio (HSR) on the spread of spinal anaesthesia in term parturients.

Materials and Methods: The present study was a prospective cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, a tertiary care centre, at Imphal, Manipur, India, from October 2019 to September 2021. A total of 92 parturients aged 18-40 years of age, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I and II, undergoing elective caesarean section under subarachnoid block were enrolled. With the parturient in lateral position, a 25G spinal needle was inserted in the L4-L5 interspace. A 2 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine was injected intrathecal in 10 seconds. Age, height, weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), HSR and Vertebral Column Length (VCL) were recorded. Spinal anaesthesia spread was assessed at 0,5,10,15,20,25,30 minutes after the procedure with pin prick test starting from the anaesthetised area and continued cephalad till the sensation changed from the dullness to sharp pain in both the mid-clavicular lines. Statistical analysis of the data obtained was done using Windows based Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0.

Results: The mean age, weight, height and BMI were 28.82±6.2 years, 62.36±5.8 kilograms, 158.63±4 centimetre, and 24.77±2 Kg/m2, respectively. HSR and shoulder width had a significant correlation with the cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia with r=-0.672 and p-value <0.001 and r=0.369 and p-value <0.001, respectively.

Conclusion: The HSR and shoulder width has a significant correlation with spread of spinal anaesthesia with a given dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in parturients. The study should expect more cephalad spread of anaesthesia in parturient population when the HSR >1.

Keywords

Cephalad, Correlation, Pin prick, Significant

Spinal anaesthesia is the most preferred and widely used anaesthetic technique for elective Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS). Spinal anaesthesia offers less exposure to the potentially depressant drugs to that of general anaesthesia and also allows early bonding between mother and their newborn as mother is awake throughout the procedure. Despite the numerous advantages, the risk of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia remains the most common side-effect in term parturients even with preloading and left uterine displacement and other protective manoeuvers (1). This is directly related to the excessive high cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia. On the other hand, insufficient spinal spread may cause pain and other discomfort in patients and hamper the surgical procedures. Therefore, it is a challenge for the anaesthesiologist to achieve a suitable spread of spinal anaesthesia in caesarean section because of individual anthropometric variations among the parturient (2).

It has been described that approximately 25 factors affect the spread of spinal anaesthesia in the subarachnoid space for a given dose of local anaesthetic drug (3). But practically it is hard to isolate one factor and quantify its effect on the spread of spinal anaesthesia. Variables that are practically obtainable and that have a predictive value on the spread of spinal anaesthesia will help the anaesthesiologist to predict the spread of spinal anaesthesia. Some of the factors like patient characteristics, techniques of injection, patient posture and baricity of local anaesthetic are the most studied variables that affect the spread of spinal anaesthesia.

The intrathecal spread of spinal anaesthesia for a given dose of plain bupivacaine is highly unpredictable, whereas the spread of spinal anaesthesia with a same dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine is more predictable; so spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine is the preferred anaesthetic technique for elective LSCS. Some of the patient variables studied which influence the spread of spinal anaesthesia are age, weight, height, gender, patient position, BMI, VCL and abdominal circumference etc., (4). Since, hormonal and anatomical changes occur during pregnancy, pregnancy itself is one of the factors influencing the spread of spinal anaesthesia. During pregnancy, generally the hip width of the parturient is greater than the shoulder width. Thus, in a horizontal operating table, a pregnant woman lying on the lateral position has slightly head down position due to the difference in the width of the hip and shoulder.

A few workers have studied about this correlation between HSR and the intrathecal spread of spinal anaesthesia with a fixed dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine in both pregnant and non pregnant population of Caucasian ethnicity [5,6]. They opined that HSR may be more important than either patient height or VCL in predicting the cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia for each parturients. So, the present study was conducted to assess the association/correlation between HSR and spread of spinal anaesthesia in term parturients of ethnic Manipuri population, undergoing elective caesarean delivery between the child bearing age group. The primary outcome of the study was to assess the maximum cephalad dermatome level achieved for a measured HSR and VCL. The secondary measures were to assess the block characteristics, haemodynamic parameters and side-effects such as hypotension, bradycardia, nausea and vomiting.

Material and Methods

The prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, at Imphal, Manipur, India, from October 2019 to September 2021. Approval from the Institutional Research Ethics Board vide order no. A/206/REB-Comm (SP)/RIMS/2015/
524/2/2019, dated 24th October 2019 was taken before the commencement of the study.

Inclusion criteria: A total of 92 parturients, belonging to only ethnic population of Manipur with term singleton, ASA physical status I and II were enrolled in the study, after receiving written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria: Parturients refusing regional anaesthesia, history of allergy to study drugs, pregnancy induced hypertension, cardiovascular co-morbidities, central nervous system disease, abnormal coagulation profile, local site infection, spinal deformity and with weight <50 kg or >110 kg, height <140 cm and >180 cm and parturient belonging to other ethnic groups were excluded from this study.

Sampling procedure was of convenience type and flow diagram is shown in (Table/Fig 1).

Study Procedure

Routine preanaesthetic assessment were conducted for all the patients and inj. Metoclopramide i.v. and inj. Ranitidine 50 mg i.v. were given in the preanaesthetic room with establishment of intravenous line to start the maintenance fluids. On arrival at the operation theatre, monitoring of Heart Rate (HR), Non Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP), Oxygen Saturation (SPO2) and Electro-Cardiogram (ECG) was started. Anthropometric measurements were recorded in the sitting position. All the parturient received Ringers Lactate solution (10 mL/kg) as preloading solution within 30 minutes of subarachnoid block. In the lateral position, the skin over the desired site for spinal block was infiltrated with local anaesthetic (2% lignocaine, 1 mL) under strict aseptic and antiseptic precaution and dural puncture was performed in the L3-4 interspace under strict sterile conditions through a 25G Quincke needle using a midline approach. After confirming the free flow of cerebrospinal fluid, spinal anaesthesia was performed with 2 mL (10 mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with the bevel end turned cephalad without barbotage. The patient 15was immediately made supine with a left lateral uterine tilt with a wedge. A 22G pinprick was used to assess/detect the cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia by the loss of sensation to pin prick test at varied time intervals: 0,5,10,15,20,25, 30 minutes after the spinal injection. The pin prick test/assessment was assessed starting from the anaesthetised area and continued cephalad till the sensation changed from the dullness to sharp pain in both the mid-clavicular lines. The number of blocked segments were recorded starting from the sacral vertebra to the maximal cephalad spread. The other block characteristics such as time of sensory block at T10, time to adequate block level (T4-T6), Maximum Sensory Level achieved (MSBL) and Time to Peak Sensory Block level (TPSB) were also recorded. The operative procedure was commenced only when a sensory block of T6 was achieved within eight minutes. A patient was not taken up for the study if adequate block of T6 was not achieved within eight minutes. Rescue measures (10º head down manipulation of the table to attain the desired block level or conversion to general anaesthesia) were advocated. The haemodynamic changes such as the systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure and Heart Rate (HR) were recorded. The details of any other adverse effects (if any) were also taken into account.

Statistical Analysis

The data were collected in Windows excel worksheet and summarised using descriptive statistics like percentage, mean, etc. Statistical analysis of the data obtained was done using Windows based Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) by using the appropriate statistical analysis, Student’s t-test for continuous data, Chi-square test for categorical data, p<0.05, was considered as statistically significant. The analysis of correlation of HSR, VCL and other anthropometric measurements with the spread of the spinal anaesthesia were analysed using the Pearson and Spearman’s Rho correlation tests.

Results

All the parturient included in the study reached a satisfactory spinal anaesthesia dermatome level for caesarean delivery and none required rescue measures. The characteristics of the participants are summarised in (Table/Fig 2). The maximum cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia ranged from T6-T2 and the time to reach maximum sensory block was 4.61±1.72 (min).

(Table/Fig 3)a summarised Pearson bivariate correlations between parturient characteristics and the cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia. There was a significant correlation between HSR and cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia (p-value <0.001; (Table/Fig 3)b) and also between shoulder width and cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia (p-value <0.001; (Table/Fig 3)c). There was no correlation between parturient age (p=0.968), height (p=0.473), weight (p=0.613), VCL (p=0.357), BMI (p=0.163), abdominal circumference (p=0.881) and the cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia.

Discussion

It is well known that various factors could possibly influence the distribution of subarachnoid local anaesthetics (4). After subarachnoid injection of local anaesthetics, the predictability of the level of spinal anaesthesia is often hard as it is influenced by multiple factors. Pitkänen M and Rosenberg PH pointed out that the dose and baricity of the local anaesthetic along with the position of the patient determine the spread of local anaesthetics (6). Further, it was shown that patient position and the baricity of the local anaesthetic drugs are the two most important factors influencing caudal or cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia under the effect of 16gravitational forces [2,(3),(4). Hence, in the present study, a fixed dose of 2 mL of 5% hyperbaric bupivacaine was used for all the parturients in the left lateral position in order to reduce the confounding factor. On a day-to-day practice, the anthropometric parameters that are easily measurable may aid to predict the level of spinal anaesthesia in parturients.

The study demonstrated that parturient with HSR >1 has a correlation with higher cephalad spread of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia. Normally, during pregnancy, the physiological factors and hormones have significant effects on the bony structure of the pelvis to provide a birth canal for the foetus resulting in an increased hip width compared to that of shoulder width (7). The spread of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine also depends on the immediate position of the patient (8). Thus, parturients on a horizontal operating table and in left lateral position with greater hip width and narrow shoulder width assumed a relative Trendelenburg position, resulting in HSR >1, which aided hyperbaric 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine to cause more cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia, immediately after the subarachnoid injection and the increase in HSR >1 may be one of the important patient variables altering the cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia in pregnant patients undergoing caesarean section as observed in the present study.

It is clearly evident from the current study that almost all the parturients with HSR 1 had sensory block level more than or equal to T4 which resulted in a higher spread of spinal anaesthesia. This finding was in accordance with a few other studies [5,6] which suggested strong positive correlation of cephalad spread with HSR and inverse correlation with height and VCL.

The present study observed a statistically significant correlation between shoulder width of the parturient and the maximum sensory block level. This was not previously mentioned in any studies as a variable influencing the distribution of subarachnoid local anaesthetics. The study did not find any correlation between abdominal circumference and the level of maximum sensory blockade. The studies by Kouk CH et al., and Lee YH et al., failed to find any correlation between abdominal circumference and maximum dermatomal level using 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine [9,10]. This lack of correlation could be due to the parturient lying supine; hyperbaric bupivacaine only pooled in the lowest part of the thoracic curvature because the capacity of the upper thoracic pool could not be exceeded by the doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) used in this clinical study.

The current study did not find any correlation between VCL and the spread of spinal anaesthesia in parturients. This was in accordance with other studies (5),(11),(12). Pargger H et al., also reported that there was no correlation between VCL and the cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia, but the drug used for subarachnoid injection was plain bupivacaine and on non parturient (13). In another study on non pregnant patients, there was no correlation with VCL and the spread of spinal anaesthesia (14). However, Hartwell BL et al., found strong correlation of cephalad spread and VCL in term parturient when employing fixed dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine (15). The results of the present study and those of Hartwell BL are different and this may be due to the technical differences of spinal anaesthesia administration, avoidance of barbotage, different level and doses of intrathecal placement (15).

The current study found a statistically significant positive correlation between height and VCL. This finding is on contrary with that of Hartwell BL et al., who reported a weak correlation between height and VCL (15). Racial differences causing the differences in anthropometric measures and usually shorter height of Asian than European women may explain the differences (16).

In the present study, no correlation between the cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia and age, weight, height and BMI in pregnant patients was observed and this is similar to other studies conducted by Norris MC and Hartwell BL et al., [11,15].

Limitation(s)

The present study did not consider the effect of gravida which may alter the spread of spinal anaesthesia. Further studies can be carried out in non parturients to find out the outcome.

Conclusion

The HSR and shoulder width has a significant correlation with spread of spinal anaesthesia with a given dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in parturients. The measurements obtained from the parturient hip and shoulder will help the anaesthesiologists to predict the spread of spinal anaesthesia and to titrate the dose of intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for individual parturient. It should expect more cephalad spread of anaesthesia in parturient population when the HSR >1.

References

1.
Mercier FJ, Auge M, Hoffmann C, Fischer C, Le Gouez A. Maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for caesarean delivery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79:62-73.
2.
Hocking G, Wildsmith JAW. Intrathecal drug spread. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93(4):568-78. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Zhou QH, Xiao WP, Shen YY. Abdominal girth, vertebral column length, and spread of spinal anesthesia in 30 minutes after plain bupivacaine 5 mg/mL. Anesth Analg. 2014;119(1):203-06. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Deshpande AV, Deshpande SA, Bhosale UT. Correlation between spinal column length and the spread of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine in the term parturient. J of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci. 2014;3(11):2892-97. [crossref]
5.
Cantürk M, Cantürk FK, Dag? li R, Dag? li SS. The spread of spinal anesthesia in term parturient: Effect of hip/shoulder width ratio and vertebral column length. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2016;9(11):21562-67.
6.
Pitkänen M, Rosenberg PH. Local anaesthetics and additives for spinal anaesthesia: Characteristics and factors influencing the spread and duration of the block. Best Pract Res Cl Anaesth. 2003;17:305-22. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Cantürk M, Hakki M, Kocaog? lu N. Hip/shoulder width ratio alters the spread of spinal anesthesia: A prospective observational study. Ulutas Med J. 2018;4(1):32-37. [crossref]
8.
Wei CN, Zhang YF, Xia F, Wang LZ, Zhou QH. Abdominal girth, vertebral column length and spread of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine in the term parturient. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2017;3:63-67. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Kuok CH, Huang CH, Tsai PS, Ko YP, Lee WS, Hsu YW, et al. Preoperative measurement of maternal abdominal circumference relates the initial sensory block level of spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: An observational study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55(6):810-14. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Lee YH, Wang YC, Wang ML, Lin PL, Huang CH, Huang HH. Relationship of abdominal circumference and trunk length with spinal anesthesia level in the term parturient. J Anesth. 2014;28:202-05. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Norris MC. Height, weight and the spread of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine in the term parturient. Anesth Analg. 1988;67(6):555-58. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Wan Rahiza WM, Raha AR, Muhd Helmi A, Nadia MN, Muhammad M, Azmil Farid Z, et al. Correlation between spinal column length and the spread of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine in the term parturient. S Afr J Anaesthesiol Analg. 2014;16(3):30-33. [crossref]
13.
Pargger H, Hampl KF, Aeschbach A, Paganoni R, Schneider MC. Combined effect of patient variables on sensory level after spinal 0.5% plain bupivacaine. Acta Anesthesiol Scand. 1998;42(4):430-34. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Perez-Tamayo L, Zetina-Velez B, Aldrete JA. Sensory level of subarachnoid block: Influence of dose, height, and sitting height. Reg Anesth. 1997;2:02-03.
15.
Hartwell BL, Aglio LS, Hauch MA, Datta S. Vertebral column length and spread of hyperbaric subarachnoid bupivacaine in the term parturient. Reg Anesth.1991;16(1):17-19.
16.
Roy D, Swarbrick C, King Y, Pye S, Adams J, Berry J, et al. Differences in peak bone mass in women of European and South Asian origin can be explained by differences in body size. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(10):1254-62.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60093.17586

Date of Submission: Sep 06, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 09, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Dec 13, 2022
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 15, 2022
• Manual Googling: Nov 30, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Dec 06, 2022 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com