Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 19066

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : SC34 - SC37 Full Version

Clinical Profile and Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern of Community Acquired Urinary Tract Infections in Children Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in Assam, India


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62444.17654
Dulal Kalita, Fahima Naznin Islam, Mahibur Rahman

1. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India. 2. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Paediatrics, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dulal Kalita,
Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, P.O. Indrapur, Guwahati-781032, Assam, India.
E-mail: dulalkalita68@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) is a common problem in children. It is a very common cause of fever in children after gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases. Uropathogens causing community acquired UTI is increasing due to changing antibiotic sensitivity pattern over time. Appropriate choice of antibiotic is crucial to prevent complications related to UTI.

Aim: To study the clinical profile, risk factors, associated pathogen spectrum and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern in community acquired UTI.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study with 150 sample size was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India and was carried out among children (1 month to 12 years of age) with community acquired UTI, over a period of one year in the state of Assam. Fresh urine samples were collected by clean catch mid-stream method for toilet trained children and by transurethral catheterisation for infants and young children. It was followed by routine urine examination and culture and sensitivity testing to diagnose UTI. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the results Proportion test was used for statistical evaluation.

Results: Majority of UTI cases were in the age group 1-5 years (57.3%) and there was female preponderance (59.3%). Fever was the most common presentation (55.3% cases) in the present study. This was followed by poor feeding (12.6%), lower abdominal pain (10.6%), failure to gain weight (10.6%). In urinalysis, 87 cases (58%) showed pyuria, 6 cases (4%) showed significant haematuria. Most prevalent uropathogens in the present study was Escherichia coli (E.coli) (66%cases), followed by Enterococcus sp. (16.7%), Klebsiella sp. (14%). E.coli had maximum sensitivity for nitrofurantoin (90.9%). It was followed by amikacin (80%), co-trimoxazole in 64.6% and gentamycin in 62.6% cases.

Conclusion: All fever cases in children should be screened to rule out UTI. All UTI cases should undergo culture and sensitivity testing to determine the sensitivity pattern.

Keywords

Antimicrobial agents, Paediatric infection, Renal scarring, Uropathogen

Infection of the urinary tract system is a common problem in the community. The overall prevalence of UTI in the population is 11% (1). UTI is common in children consisting 3% of all paediatric infections (2). The prevalence of UTI among children visiting medical emergency is 5-14% (3),(4). Mostly children present with fever. Any children presenting with unexplained fever more than 38°C should be evaluated for UTI (5). However, other clinical features for older children can be dysuria, pain abdomen, increase frequency of urine, but younger children most of the time present with non specific symptoms like vomiting, failure to thrive, jaundice etc. It is more common in male than female in neonatal and early infancy period, after that female preponderance is evident (5). It is associated with several risk factors such as recent catheterisation, cleaning perineum from back to front, constipation, usage of tight underclothing, diaper usage, worm infestation, neurological abnormality, voluntary withholding of urine etc., (6). Also, UTI can be associated with long-term complications like hypertension, impaired renal function, end-stage renal disease etc., especially when timely proper antibiotic has not been administered (7). Hence, early diagnosis and early initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy is necessary to prevent these complications. Again, the prevalence of the uropathogens causing UTI i.e., E.coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, Enterococcus etc., and their sensitivity pattern to antibiotics vary among different geographic areas around the world. Moreover, emergence of antibiotic resistance among these uropathogens is a concern now-a-days (2). Therefore, reviewing the sensitivity profile of the bacteria through scientific research from time to time is important to guide the treatment so that, authors can start empirical antibiotic therapy while waiting for urine culture and sensitivity report.

Till now, no data is available regarding clinical profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern in community acquired UTI among children in Assam, however a few studies done on adult population are available for review (8),(9). Hence, considering all these facts, the present study was conducted with the objective to study the clinical profile, risk factors, associated pathogen spectrum and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern in community acquired UTI.

Material and Methods

This was a cross-sectional observational study which was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India, from 1st May 2020 to 30th April 2021. The proposed format was passed by the ethics committee of Gauhati Medical College and Hospital. Ethical approval number given was 190/2007/pt-11/Dec- 2019/03. Informed written consent was taken from the parents of the children enrolled in the study in their native language.

Sample size calculation: Considering the prevalence of UTI among children visiting healthcare facility to be 10%, the present study was conducted with sample size of 150 patients (7),(10),(11). Sample size was calculated using Danial’s formula: Sample size, n=Z2p(1-p)/d2.

Inclusion criteria: Patient in the age group of one month to 12 years attending Paediatric Emergency and Outpatient service with suspicion for urinary infection were worked up and only the urine culture positive cases were enrolled in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients were excluded if: (a) they had history of antibiotic usage in last one week; (b) acquired infection in the hospital after 48 hours of hospitalisation for other reason (12); (c) with known congenital genitourinary anomalies; and (d) recurrent UTI. A total of 150 patients were included in the study and 60 patients were excluded.

Study Procedure

History was taken enquiring age of the patient, presenting complaint with duration, past illness with urinary complaints and fever, any surgical intervention done for urinary tract abnormality, whether there is history of constipation, pin worm infestation etc. Physical examination was performed to check the vitals of the child and for preliminary systemic survey. Data was collected in pretested proforma.

Fresh urine samples were collected by clean catch mid-stream method for toilet trained children and by transurethral catheterisation for infants and young children. It was followed by routine urine examination and culture and sensitivity testing to diagnose UTI. Total leucocyte count was done in all cases. Additional tests like Ultrasonography of kidney-urinary bladder and Micturating Cystourethrogram (MCU) were done as per the need of the patient. In routine examination of urine >5 pus cells/HPF in centrifuged sample were considered for pyuria (13) and >5 red blood cells/HPF for haematuria (14). Urine culture was done using CLED agar plate and sensitivity was checked using Vitek 2 Compact, Identification and Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing System. In the present study, for Midstream clean catch urine sample, more than or equal to 105 CFU/mL was considered significant for infection and for urethral catheterisation sample, more than or equal to 5×104 CFU/mL was considered significant to have infection (14).

Statistical Analysis

The data collected from the patients were formatted into Microsoft excel sheets to generate master chart, tables, and graphs. Diagrammatic representations were used to depict significant clinical data from patients with culture proven UTI. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the results. Proportion test was used for statistical evaluation. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant at 5% level of significance and p-values calculated using Chi-square test. SPSS software version 28 was used to analyse the data.

Results

The study was conducted with sample size of 150 from age one month to 12 years. Out of that 67 were male and 83 female. Majority of the cases were in the 1-5 year age group (57.3%). In infancy, 20.7% cases were seen (Table/Fig 1).

Regarding gender distribution, it was found that female 89 cases (59.3%) and male 61 cases (40.6%) in the present study. Fever was the most common presentation (55.3% cases) in the present study. This was followed by poor feeding (12.6%), lower abdominal pain (10.6%), failure to gain weight (10.6%), increase frequency of micturition (10.7%), vomiting (10%), burning micturition (6.7%). The present study found maximum number of fever cases presented in the age group of 1-5 years (60 cases, 40%) and this was statistically significant (p<0.001). Lower abdominal pain was the presenting symptom of UTI, mostly in the age group of 5-10 years (13 cases, 8.6%) (p-value=0.12). Failure to gain weight was most common presenting feature in infancy (12 cases, 8%). Burning micturition was the clinical presentation in children with UTI in more than five years age group in the present study. Total of 6.7% cases presented with this symptom in the present study. Total of 10.6% cases in the study had increase frequency of micturition as a clinical feature. Maximum children with increased frequency of micturition (10 out of 16 cases, 6.7%) were found in the age group 1-5 years (Table/Fig 2).

Out of 150, 4.7% cases with UTI were associated with diaper rash, 2% were associated with constipation and 2% with pin worm infection (Table/Fig 3).

In the present study, most prevalent uropathogen was E.coli (66%), followed by Enterococcus sp. (16.7%), Klebsiella sp. (14%). Least commonly found organisms were Candida 2 (1.3%) and Morganella 3 (2%) as revealed from the urine culture studies (Table/Fig 4). E.coli was the most common organism in all age group and most children with E.coli infection were presented with fever (51.5%), followed by poor feeding (15.2%), failure to gain weight (11.1%), pain abdomen (10.1%), increased frequency of micturition (8.1%), burning micturition (7%).

It was seen that, E.coli had maximum sensitivity for nitrofurantoin (90.9%). It was followed by amikacin (80%). It was sensitive to co-trimoxazole in 64.6% cases, gentamycin in 62.6% cases, tigecycline in 56.6% cases, to meropenem 54.4% cases, piperacillin in 53.5% cases. It shows Enterococcus had highest sensitivity for linezolid (92%) and vancomycin (92%). It is followed by its sensitivity for teicoplanin (88%), tetracycline (84%), tigecycline (76%). Klebsiella was sensitive to amikacin (76.2%), aztreonam (76.2%) and colistin (76.2%) in maximum number cases (Table/Fig 5).

Further, in the present study total 83 out of 150 (55.3%) cases presented with leucocytosis and maximum number was in the age group of 1-5 years (51 cases) (Table/Fig 6).

In urinalysis, 87 cases (58%) showed pyuria, 6 cases (4%) showed significant haematuria and significant urine albumin present in 24% cases. Again, in ultrasonographic evaluation of kidney-urinary bladder in the present study, 4 out of 150 (2.7%) cases were found to have posterior urethra valve, 13 out of 150 (8.6%) cases had cystitis.

Discussion

The present study determined the distribution and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of microbial species isolated from paediatric patients with community acquired UTI from a tertiary care centre along with clinical profile. In the present study, maximum prevalence of UTI was found in the age group of 1-5 years. Other workers like Patel AH et al., Sharma A et al., from different parts of the country found similar picture (15),(16). Patel AH et al., had 41.07% cases and Sharma A et al., had 50% cases in this age group of 1-5 years (15),(16). On the other hand, in the study by Gupta P et al., maximum cases found to be in infants (56.4%) (17).

The present study showed there was female preponderance among the cases (55.3%) and this was concordant with the findings in the studies reviewed. Patel AH et al., found 57.1% female in their study, Bhonsle K et al., found 54% female, Singh SD and Madhup SK found 67.4% female cases among the cases positive for UTI (15),(18),(19). This is because of shorter urethra, close approximation of urethral opening and anal canal in female, which makes them susceptible to contamination with faecal flora and ascent of faecal flora into the urinary tract.

Among clinical features, fever was most common in the present study (55%), and others are pain abdomen, vomiting, failure to gain weight, burning micturition, increase frequency of micturition, poor feeding. Different researchers from different parts of the country also found fever as the most common clinical presentation of UTI in children. Patel AH et al., had 69.6% patients presenting with fever, Singh SD and Madhup SK had 74.8% cases, Badhan R et al., had 41.7% (15),(19),(20).

In the present study, 4.7% cases with UTI were associated with diaper rash, 2% were associated with constipation and 2% with pin worm infection. Malla KK et al., found constipation in 7.1% cases with UTI (21). Patel AH et al., found constipation in 5.4% cases with UTI (15). Regarding routine urine examination this study showed 58% cases of pyuria. This was comparable with findings of Hanna-Wakim RH et al., who showed in their study 60.1% cases had pyuria (22). However, in the study done by Sriram G et al., found that 13.5% cases had pyuria (23).

Again, in the present study E.coli was the most common uropathogen associated with UTI (66%), followed by Enterococcus and Klebsiella. This finding was supported by finding from other studies reviewed. Bhonsle et al., had 60.3% cases and Badhan R et al., had 42.3% infections with E.coli (18),(20). Patel AH et al., had 58.9% cases, Gupta P et al., had 68.3% cases, Sriram G et al., had 54.5% cases and Kaur N et al., had 45.4% cases (15),(17),(23),(24). Among the gram-positive organism Enterococcus was found to a causative agent in the present study (16.7%) cases.

Also, the present study observed that sensitivity of E.coli to nitrofurantoin is 90.9%. This comparable to the findings in Patel AH et al., (100%), Gupta P et al., (100%), Badhan R et al., (94%), Kaur N et al., (95%) (15),(17),(20),(24). It was found in this study that sensitivity of E.coli to amikacin was in 80.8% cases. This finding is comparable to the studies done by, Patel AH et al., (90.9%), Gupta P et al., (90.7%) and Patwardhan V et al., (89.8%). Sensitivity of E.coli to amoxiclav was 46.5% in this study. This value is near to the values found in the studies done by Patel AH et al., (48.5%) and Patwardhan V et al., (51.8%) (15),(25); whereas Kaur N et al., recorded only 29% cases to be sensitive to amoxiclav (24). Also, found in this study that E.coli was sensitive to Trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole in 64.6% cases, gentamycin in 62.6% cases, tigecycline in 56.6% cases, meropenem in 54.4% cases, piperacillin in 53.5% cases. The (Table/Fig 7) shows comparative sensitivity of most common organism causing UTI in children i.e., E.coli, from different studies reviewed (15),(17),(20),(24),(25).

The present study showed Klebsiella were most sensitive to amikacin (76.2%). Patel AH et al., Badhan R et al., were also reported comparable values, 77.8% and 71%, respectively (15),(20).

However, Gupta P et al., had 53.3% cases and Kaur N et al., had 59% cases of Klebsiella with sensitive to amikacin (17),(24).

It was also found from the present study that Enterococcus had maximum sensitivity for Linezolid (92%) and vancomycin (92%). However, Gupta P et al., found in their study that Enterococcus was 96.8% sensitive to meropenem (17). Kaur N et al., from their study found that Enterococcus was most sensitive to Nitrofurantoin (24). From the present study, the authors have seen that most of the uropathogens are not sensitive to commonly used oral antibiotics like co-amoxiclav, co-trimoxazole. Klebsiella is sensitive to no oral antibiotics and Enterococcus is sensitive to linezolid only, among oral antibiotics.

Limitation(s)

One of the limitations of the present study was that, it was an observational study. Moreover, it was a small study and sample size was small. Further, the study was conducted in a short period.

Conclusion

All fever cases in children should be screened to rule out UTI. High suspicion should be kept in case of infants, to detect UTI with the aim to prevent urosepsis and renal scarring. Improper and overzealous use of antibiotic should be stopped to prevent emergence of new resistant strains of bacteria. Also, over the counter selling of antibiotics should be stopped. Regional surveillance program can be conducted periodically in each region to know the prevalent uropathogens pattern and their change in antibiotic susceptibility pattern in the community level.

References

1.
Medina M, Castillo-Pino E. An introduction to the epidemiology and burden of urinary trac infections. Ther Adv Urol. 2019;11:03-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Kalal BS, Patel R. Microbiological and antimicrobial profile of urinary tract infection in children from a teaching hospital in South India. Journal of Pediatric Infection (Çocuk Enfeksiyon Dergisi). 2017(11):19-22. [crossref]
3.
Almofarreh M, Alowaa Z, Junainah E, Alshahrani N, Alharbi M, Alkhalifah W, et al. Prevalence of urinary tract infection among children. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2018;5(6):2356-59. [crossref]
4.
Shaikh N, Morone NE, Bost JE, Farrell MH. Prevalence of urinary tract infection in childhood: A meta-analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27(4):302-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Okarska-Napierala M, Wasilewska A, Kuchar E. Urinary tract infection in children: Diagnosis, treatment, imaging-Comparison of current guidelines. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2017;13(6):567-73. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Kavitha J, Aravind MA, Jayachandran G, Priya S. Risk factors for urinary tract infection in pediatric patients. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2017;5(1):184-89. [crossref]
7.
Hellerstein S. The long-term consequences of urinary tract infections: A historic and contemporary perspective. Pediatric annals. 1999;28(11):695-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Sharma I, Paul D. Prevalence of community acquired urinary tract infections in Silchar Medical College, Assam, India and its antimicrobial susceptibility profile. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012;66(11/12):273. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Paul D, Anto N, Bhardwaj M, Prendiville A, Elangovan R, Bachmann TT, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in patients with suspected urinary tract infections in primary care in Assam, India. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance. 2021;3(4):dlab164. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Freedman AL, Urologic Diseases in America Project. Urologic diseases in North America Project:trends in resource utilization for urinary tract infections in children. The Journal of Urology. 2005;173(3):949-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Alper BS, Curry SH. Urinary tract infection in children. American Family Physician. 2005;72(12):2483-88.
12.
World Health Organization. Prevention of hospital-acquired infections: A practical guide. World Health Organization; 2002.
13.
Vijayakumar M. Revised statement on management of urinary tract infections. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48:709-17.
14.
Kliegman R, Stanton B, St Geme JW, Schor NF, Behrman RE, Nelson WE. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. Edition 21 ed. Philadelphia PA: Elsevier; 2020.
15.
Patel AH, Bhavsar RH, Trivedi P, Mehta SR. Urinary tract infections in children: Clinical profile, bacteriology and antibiotic sensitivity pattern. GCSMC J Med Sci. 2015;4(11):75-82.
16.
Sharma A, Shrestha S, Upadhyay S, Rijal P. Clinical and bacteriological profile of urinary tract infection in children at Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital. Nepal Med Coll J. 2011;13(1):24-26.
17.
Gupta P, Mandal J, Krishnamurthy S, Barathi D, Pandit N. Profile of urinary tract infections in Paediatric patients. Indian J Med Res. 2015;141(4):473. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Bhonsle K, Vyas A, Vyas H, Ramchandani A, Hemwani K. Prevalence, identification and frequency of uropathogens causing urinary tract infection in children in Ujjain (M.P.). Indian J Microbiol Res. 2022;9(2):131-34. [crossref]
19.
Singh SD, Madhup SK. Clinical profile and antibiotics sensitivity in childhood urinary tract infection at Dhulikhel Hospital. Kathmandu University Medical Journal. 2013;11(4):319-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Badhan R, Singh DV, Badhan LR, Kaur A. Evaluation of bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity patterns in children with urinary tract infection: A prospective study from a tertiary care center. Indian Journal of Urology: IJU: Journal of the Urological Society of India. 2016;32(1):50. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Malla KK, Sarma MS, Malla T, Thapalial A. Clinical profile, bacterial isolates and antibiotic susceptibility patterns in urinary tract infection in children-hospital based study. Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society. 2008;28(2):52-61. [crossref]
22.
Hanna-Wakim RH, Ghanem ST, El Helou MW, Khafaja SA, Shaker RA, Hassan SA, et al. Epidemiology and characteristics of urinary tract infections in children and adolescents. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2015;5:45. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Sriram G, Satyanarayana A, Naik DR, Chandra TJ. Prevalence of urinary tract infection in febrile children between one to five years of age. Int J Pediatr Res. 2019;6(10):542-46. [crossref]
24.
Kaur N, Sharma S, Malhotra S, Madan P, Hans C. Urinary tract infection: Aetiology and antimicrobial resistance pattern in infants from a tertiary care hospital in northern India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(10):DC01. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Patwardhan V, Kumar D, Goel V, Singh S. Changing prevalence and antibiotic drug resistance pattern of pathogens seen in community-acquired pediatric urinary tract infections at a tertiary care hospital of North India. J Lab Physicians. 2017;9(04):264-68.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62444.17654

Date of Submission: Dec 22, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 06, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 09, 2023
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 23, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 09, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 31, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com