Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 17615

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : PC01 - PC04 Full Version

Profile of Arteriovenous Fistula Surgery in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease at a Tertiary Care Urology Hospital Karnataka, India: A Prospective Interventional Study


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/56999.17589
JB Narendra, Mayur M Narkhede, Dhruvit K Soni

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Institute of Nephrourology, Mysuru Branch, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. 2. Urologist, Department of Urology, Institute of Nephrourology, Mysuru Branch, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. 3. Urologist, Department of Urology, Institute of Nephrourology, Mysuru Branch, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
JB Narendra,
Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Institute of Nephrourology, Mysuru Branch, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: narenjburo@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Haemodialysis (HD) is the most important treatment approach in patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), awaiting kidney transplantation, demanding the long-term need for dialysis access.

Aim: To study the profile of Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) surgery in patients undergoing haemodialysis in the Karnataka region, India.

Materials and Methods: This prospective, interventional single-centre study was conducted at the Institute of Nephrology and Urology, KR Hospital Campus, Mysuru, India, from April 2018 to April 2021. All the patients undergoing haemodialysis with AVF aged between 11-90 years were included. Demographic details (age, sex, co-morbidities) and fistula-related complications associated with surgery were examined in the immediate, late, and delayed postoperative period. Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages whereas, continuous variables were expressed as mean {Standard Deviation (SD)}. The data was collected in excel sheet and the statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 20.0.

Results: In total, 200 patients with a mean (SD) age of 48.8 (13.0) years underwent AVF formation and the majority were below <60 years of age (n=154, 77.0%). The incidence of fistula surgery and patency rates was higher in men (n=140, 70.0%). Most patients had left non dominant arm (n=187, 93.5%) and remaining right non dominant arm (n=13, 6.5%). The most common site of AVF was left brachial cephalic (n=135, 67.5%). The most common cause of CKD was diabetes mellitus (n=90, 45.0%). The most common immediately observed complications were bleeding (n=13, 6.5%), pain (n=12, 6.0%) and oedematous limb (n=5, 5.0%). Stitch abscess was the most common late complication observed in 14 patients (7%). Rupture of the aneurysm and AVF failure were delayed complications observed in eight (1.5%) and 17 (8.5%) patients, respectively.

Conclusion: In this study, bleeding, stitch abscess and AVF failure were found to be the most common immediate, late, and delayed postoperative complications, respectively. However, more studies are required to understand the outcome of AVF in Chronic Renal Failure (CRF) patients from India.

Keywords

Aneurysm, Bleeding, Diabetes mellitus, Fistula, Haemodialysis

Chronic Kidney Disease is a major contributor to mortality from non communicable diseases showing an increased mortality rate of 41.5% between 1990 and 2017 (1). HD is the most important treatment approach in patients with CKD, awaiting kidney transplantation, demanding the long-term need for dialysis access (2). However, several associated complications hamper dialysis function necessitating the establishment of AVFs (2).

An AVF is an access created by connecting a vein to an artery, where the vein is the accessible channel (3). Radiocephalic (RC-AVF), Brachiocephalic (BC-AVF), and Brachial-Basilic (BB-AVF) are the primarily used AVFs. An AVF is the preferred mode of vascular access for HD in patients with CKD. It is favoured in most events, over arteriovenous grafts and catheters due to longer patency and lower infection risk [4,5]. An investigation from the United States (N=85, 320) showed that 77.9% of patients underwent AVF for first-time HD access, as compared to 22.1% of patients undergoing arteriovenous grafts (6). Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) suggests a reasonable use of arteriovenous access in patients with HD, provided it is coherent with their end-stage kidney disease life plan and goals of care (7). It is reported that co-morbidities do not impact the cumulative patency or complication rates of BC-AVF (8).

Overall, there is a low rate of complications with AVF, but not limited to aneurysms, infections, steal syndrome, thrombosis, and venous hypertension (9). Cardiovascular complications, ischaemia, and ischaemic polyneuropathy in diabetes are other problems associated with AVF (10). Nevertheless, a meta-analysis showed significant variability in complication rates, which may be partly attributed to the poor quality of studies, significant variability in sample populations, and uneven definitions (9). In some cases, such as patients with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, obesity, and peripheral vascular disease, the creation of AVF is not feasible and shows a higher rate of failure and low patency rates (11),(12).

Moreover, individualised approaches to therapy, early detection, and treatment of these complications will prevent further severe events and healthcare costs (13). Studies have reported the benefits of AVF procedure in CKD in all age groups, including paediatric and elderly patients (14),(15). Despite this, there is limited literature describing the outcomes of AVF placement in end-stage kidney failure patients; especially in the Indian population, with conflicting results. Therefore, the present study describes the profile of AVF surgery in patients undergoing HD in the Karnataka region, of India.

Material and Methods

This prospective, interventional single-centre study was conducted at the Institute of Nephrology and Urology, KR Hospital Campus, Mysuru, India, from April 2018 to April 2021. Patients with Modified Diet for Renal Disease estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) below 15 mL/min were advised AVF surgery. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee (Ethics Committee of Institute of Nephrourology: 2018/RS/005, 21 March 2018). All the patients undergoing haemodialysis with AVF during the stated period of study form the sample population.

Inclusion criteria: All the patients undergoing haemodialysis with AVF and who gave consent to participate in the study were included.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who did not give consent and underwent other types of vascular access or secondary fistula formation were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

The dominance of the arm was determined by evaluating for functional or paralysed arm, previous vein puncture or oedema, and trauma. The non dominant hand was preferred for the creation of vascular access. Preoperative colour doppler ultrasound was performed in upper limb veins and arteries, to check for size and patency. It was done in patients showing inadequate clinical findings such as those with obesity, several preceding surgeries, lacking or feeble pulses, and indwelling dialysis catheters on the same side.

The patients undergoing AVF procedure were admitted on the day of surgery. All the AVF operations were done under local anaesthesia. The patient was kept hydrated and blood pressure was maintained within normal limits. The brachial artery, basilic, and cephalic vein were exposed by giving a transverse incision in the antecubital fossa and a further vertical incision was done in the forearm for the radial artery and cephalic vein. Based on the mobility of the target vein, anastomosis was created in end to side or side-to-side manner and a prolene 6/0 suture was employed. Haemostasis was monitored and the skin was closed using prolene 3/0. The non circular dressing was utilised, and postoperative hand exercises were advised. After dressing, bruit was heard, and thrill was felt to verify for fistula patency. If bruit and/or thrill were absent with decent venous filling, anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin was given subcutaneously for 3-5 days, along with aspirin 75 mg once a day for 3-5 days.

Procedure failure occurred, if the fistula did not mature effectively, if dialysis was not feasible via this site, or if the intervention was required to maintain fistula function. Patients were discharged on the same or the next day after giving proper instructions about the care of hand, and feeling the thrill, and were asked to report any numbness or discolouration at the fingertips. The complications associated with surgery were examined in the immediate (after 1 week), late (after 4-6 weeks) and delayed (after 6 weeks) postoperative period. The patency of the fistulas was evaluated using either palpation, auscultation, or a doppler probe during the follow-up period.

Statistical Analysis

The data was collected in excel sheet and the statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 20.0. Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages whereas continuous variables were expressed as mean (SD).

Results

In total, 200 patients underwent AVF formation. The mean age of enrolled patients was 48.8 years (Table/Fig 1). Majority were below <60 years of age (n=154, 77.0%) (Table/Fig 2).

The most common immediately observed complications were bleeding (n=13, 6.5%) and pain (n=12, 6.0%). Stitch abscess (n=14, 7.0%), persistent oedema (n=11, 5.5%) and aneurysm (n=8, 4.0%) were late presenting complications and rupture of aneurysm and AVF failure were delayed complications observed in 1.5% and 8.5% patients, respectively (Table/Fig 3). The presence of a palpable thrill and/or an audible bruit was utilised to confirm the fistula patency. Immediate patency and a palpable distal radial pulse were present in all the patients.

Discussion

In this study, majority of the patients undergoing AVF were between the age group of 41-60 years which corroborates with the study reported by Aljuaid MM et al., (16). Although, other age groups had fewer patients undergoing AVF; its usability was not affected by age and is safely used in elderly and paediatric patients (14),(15). Conversely, a meta-analysis demonstrated that age was significantly associated with failure of AVF and establishing proximal autologous BC-AVF has been beneficial (17). Additionally, increasing age is also an important factor in increasing the complication rate (18). Salahi H et al., reported a 35% difference in complicated cases in patients >50 years and those <18 years (18).

In this study, predominantly men underwent AVF surgery as compared to women. Although, Aljuaid MM et al., reported almost similar percentages of men (49.5%) and women (50.5%), other Indian and global studies have reported male predominance (16),(19),(20),(21). It is observed that the smaller veins in women give poorer patency of distal forearm and wrist AVFs than in men hence proximal fistula is preferred for women (22). However, Monroy-Cuadros M et al., found no significant association between gender and outcome of AVF, despite adjusting for age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, smoking history, and the procedure used (23).

The most common type of AVF used in this study was left and right BC-AVF (73.0%). In contrast, other prospective hospital-based studies have reported RC-AVF as the most common type of AVF (62.6%, 54.4%) (21),(24). The major cause of CKD was diabetes mellitus (45.0%) which corroborates with other studies (19),(25). Diabetes is responsible for a variety of macrovascular and microvascular damages and has a significant association with AVF failure (26). Nevertheless, this study does not describe any association between diabetes and AVF outcome. Nawaz S et al., reported poor outcomes for AVF in patients with diabetes (21). Monroy-Cuadros M et al., also reported that diabetes was independently associated with loss of primary patency (p=0.007) (23). Flow rates are lower in patients with diabetes as compared to patients without diabetes (p<0.001) (19). However, Aljuaid MM et al., reported hypertension (41.7%) as the most prevalent associated chronic illness and more than 30.6% had multiple chronic illnesses (16). This study also showed immunodeficiency and hypertension as common causes of CKD and some patients had both diabetes and hypertension. A study by Manne V et al., showed that hypertension was associated with reduced patency rates but age, gender, diabetes, and type of construction did not impact the patency rate (27).

The most common immediate complication reported in this study was bleeding, pain and oedematous limb. Furthermore, lately observed complications were stitch abscess, persistent oedema and aneurysm. Rupture of aneurysm and AVF failure were delayed complications. Studies commonly reported ischaemic neuropathy, aneurysm, thrombosis and infection at the site of AVF, stenosis, steal syndrome (10),(16). Nawaz S et al., reported infection and burst fistulae (4.9%), pseudo aneurysm (3.2%), and fever (4.9%) as the most frequent complications (21). An Indian study conducted in 443 patients undergoing AVF reported steal syndrome in 6.5% patients which was not observed in the present study (19). Another retrospective observation study reported oedema and steal phenomenon to be greater in proximal (9.3% and 16.3%, respectively) than in distal (4.4% and 10%, respectively) fistula (28). Indeed, Salahi H et al., reported that complications frequently occurred more in patients with elbow and right-side AVFs but no significant difference was observed between the complications in patients with diabetes or hypertension as the underlying cause of kidney failure (18).

The occurrence of vascular steal syndrome is less in RC-AVF as compared to BC-fistulae. As demonstrated by Kumar A et al., (25). RC-AVF is safe and better than BC-AVF since, it dilates both cephalic and the basilic veins and does not cause vascular syndrome; however, patency and flow rates are comparable between the two (25). Nawaz S et al., reported AVF failure in 23 patients within first month without dialysis and failing AVF and it was managed by employing new AVF. Further, he reported poor outcome for AVF in patients of either sex having diabetes (21).

A retrospective study showed a 30% incidence of primary failure and also a significant association between diabetes (odds ratio=3.5, p=0.001) with loss of primary patency (29). The multicentre, haemo study analysed the factors associated with the prevalence of AVF in a series of 1824 patients with fistulas or grafts at 45 dialysis units. The findings suggested that the prevalence of fistulas was lower in females, patients with peripheral vascular disease, blacks, patients with obesity and elderly patients (30). Another long-term study from India showed a patency rate of 78.81% at the end of one year and patency lowered to 14.81% at the end of five years in 505 AVFs in patients with CKD (19). Thus, these findings indicate that different factors influence the AVF prevalence and its patency and it should be considered when patient are undergoing AVF. Most of the reported studies were from Western world, while the present study from India showed similar finding with previously reported Western data. However, more studies are needed to understand the pattern of distribution and outcome of AVF in CRF patients from India.

Limitation(s)

The present study was limited by small sample size. This was a prospective interventional study from a single institution. Real-world studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups are necessary to conclude robustly the pattern of distribution and clinical outcomes associated with AVF surgery.

Conclusion

Vascular access is a major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with CKD undergoing haemodialysis. The most common immediate, late and delayed postoperative complications were bleeding, stitch abscess and AVF failure, respectively. However, knowledge about the potential complications of AVFs will help in timely detection, permit actions to prevent deleterious events and improve both patients’ quality of life and survival.

References

1.
GBD Chronic Kidney Disease Collaboration. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Santoro D, Benedetto F, Mondello P, Pipitò N, Barillà D, Spinelli F, et al. Vascular access for hemodialysis: Current perspectives. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2014;7:281-94. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Lee T, Mokrzycki M, Moist L, Maya I, Vazquez M, Lok CE, et al. Standardized definitions for hemodialysis vascular access. Semin Dial. 2011;24:515-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Lok CE, Sontrop JM, Tomlinson G, Rajan D, Cattral M, Oreopoulos G, et al. Cumulative patency of contemporary fistulas versus grafts (2000-2010). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:810-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Huijbregts HJTT, Bots ML, Wittens CHAA, Schrama YC, Moll FL, Blankestijn PJ, et al. Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula patency revisited: Results of a prospective, multicenter initiative. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:714-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Hicks CW, Wang P, Kernodle A, Lum YW, Black JH 3rd, Makary MA. Assessment of use of arteriovenous graft vs arteriovenous fistula for first-time permanent hemodialysis access. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(9):844-51.[crossref] [PubMed]
7.
KDOQI practice guidelines for vascular access, 2019. Available at https://www. ajkd.org/article/S0272-6386(19)31137-0/pdf. Accessed on 12 June 2021.
8.
Charlton-Ouw KM, Nosrati N, Miller CC 3 rd, Coogan SM, Safi HJ, Azizzadeh A. Outcomes of arteriovenous fistulae compared with heparin-bonded and conventional grafts for hemodialysis access. J Vasc Access. 2012;13(2):163-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Al-Jaishi AA, Liu AR, Lok CE, Zhang JC, Moist LM. Complications of the arteriovenous fistula: A systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(6):1839-50. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Stolic R. Most important chronic complications of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Med Princ Pract. 2013;22(3):220-28. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Al-Jaishi AA, Oliver MJ, Thomas SM, Lok CE, Zhang JC, Garg AX, et al. Patency rates of the arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63:464-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Coli’ L, Cuna V, Capelli I, Kwin C, Donati G, La Manna G, et al. When native arteriovenous fistula is not possible: The permanent catheter is better. G Ital Nefrol. 2009;26:154-57.
13.
Rosas SE, Feldman HL. Synthetic vascular hemodialysis access versus native arteriovenous fistula: A cost-utility analysis. Ann Surg. 2012;255:181-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Weale AR, Bevis P, Neary WD, Boyes S, Morgan JD, Lear PA, et al. Radiocephalic and brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula outcomes in the elderly. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(1):144-50. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Tannuri U, Tannuri AC, Watanabe A. Arteriovenous fistula for chronic hemodialysis in pediatric candidates for renal transplantation: Technical details and refinements. Pediatr Transplant. 2009;13(3):360-64. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Aljuaid MM, Alzahrani NN, Alshehri AA, Alkhaldi LH, Alosaimi FS, Aljuaid NW, et al. Complications of arteriovenous fistula in dialysis patients: Incidence and risk factors in Taif city, KSA. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9:407-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Lazarides MK, Georgiadis GS, Antoniou GA, Staramos DN. A meta-analysis of dialysis access outcome in elderly patients. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(2):420-26.e2. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Salahi H, Fazelzadeh A, Mehdizadeh A, Razmkon A, Malek-Hosseini SA. Complications of arteriovenous fistula in dialysis patients. Transplant Proc. 2006;38(5):1261-64. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Sahasrabudhe P, Dighe T, Panse N, Deshpande S, Jadhav A, Londhe S. Prospective long-term study of patency and outcomes of 505 arteriovenous fistulas in patients with chronic renal failure: Author’s experience and review of literature. Indian J Plast Surg. 2014;47(3):362-69. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Kim JJ, Gifford E, Nguyen V, Kaji AH, Chisum P, Zeng A, et al. Increased use of brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas improves functional primary patency. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(2):442-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Nawaz S, Ali S, Shahzad I, Baloch MU. Arterio venous fistula experience at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2013;29(1):161-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Gibbons CP. Primary vascular access. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;31(5):523-29. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Monroy-Cuadros M, Yilmaz S, Salazar-Bañuelos A, Doig C. Risk factors associated with patency loss of hemodialysis vascular access within 6 months. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(10):1787-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Pogula VR, Nalubolu MR, Byram R, Maddiboina H, Bodduluri S, Pavan AP, et al. Preoperative factors predicting the outcomes of arteriovenous fistula surgery. Indian J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;6:74-78. [crossref]
25.
Kumar A, Jha MS, Singla M, Gupta N, Raina P, Dubey D, et al. Radio-median cubital/radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula at elbow to prevent vascular steal syndrome associated with brachiocephalic fistula: Review of 320 cases. Indian J Urol. 2007;23(3):261-64. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Yan Y, Ye D, Yang L, Ye W, Zhan D, Zhang L, et al. A meta-analysis of the association between diabetic patients and AVF failure in dialysis. Ren Fail. 2018;40(1):379-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Manne V, Vaddi SP, Reddy VB, Dayapule S. Factors influencing patency of Brescia-Cimino arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2017;28(2):313-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Sahasrabudhe P, Dighe T, Panse N, Patil S. Retrospective analysis of 271 arteriovenous fistulas as vascular access for hemodialysis. Indian J Nephrol. 2013;23(3):191-95. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Monroy-Cuadros M, Yilmaz S, Salazar-Bañuelos A, Doig C. Independent prediction factors for primary patency loss in arteriovenous grafts within six months. J Vasc Access. 2012;13(1):29-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Allon M, Ornt DB, Schwab SJ, Rasmussen C, Delmez JA, Greene T, et al. Factors associated with the prevalence of arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients in the HEMO study. Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group. Kidney Int. 2000;58(5):2178-85.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/56999.17589

Date of Submission: Apr 09, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jun 07, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Dec 16, 2022
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 18, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 03, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Dec 14, 2022 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com