Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 247597

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : OC13 - OC16 Full Version

Clinical Profile of Patients on Antiepileptic Drugs Experiencing Ataxia as an Adverse Drug Reaction: A Longitudinal Observational Study


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59941.17618
Balaji More, S Murugesan, T Arun Prakash

1. Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.

Correspondence Address :
Balaji More,
Clinical Trial and Training Centre, I-Block, Ground Floor, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Pondicherry-Cuddalore Road, ECR, Pillayarkuppam, Puducherry-607402, India.
E-mail: drbdmore@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Ataxia is one the common adverse drug effect caused by Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs). It can result from either single therapeutic dose of a particular drug, prolonged use of same drug or acute poisoning.

Aim: To determine the disease burden and clinical profile of patients who are on AEDs and develop ataxia.

Materials and Methods: This was a longitudinal observational study, carried out at Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, from January 2016 to March 2022. The clinical characteristics of patients who presented with ataxia on AEDs and with no previous history of ataxia were documented. Based on the time of onset of ataxia patients were divided into three groups: Group A- Ataxia developed within 24 hours of onset of drug intake; Group B- Ataxia developed within 24 to 72 hours from prescription of drug; Group C- Ataxia developed after 72 hours from the time of drug administration. Patients were further classified into those having sensory ataxia and cerebellar ataxia. Based on the time of clinical resolution patients were classified into three subgroups: Group 1- Clinical resolution within 72 hours; Group 2- Clinical resolution in 72 to 144 hours; and Group 3- Clinical resolution after 144 hours. Data was collected systematically and results were statistically analysed using Microsoft Excel spreadsheet software program.

Results: Out of the total number of epileptic patients (1600) on AEDs, 34 patients developed ataxia. Of these 34 patients, 15 (44.11%) were on Phenytoin, 12 (35.29%) were on Carbamazepine, 3 (8.82%) were on Gabapentin, 2 (5.88%) were on Zonisamide, and 2 (5.88%) were on Lamotrigine. Dose of these drugs were modified within one day, after one and three weeks and after one month in 9 (26.47%), 7 (20.58%), 12 (35.29%), and 4 (11.76%) patients, respectively. Two patients had presented with acute poisoning. Half, 50% (n=17) patients had symptoms of sensory ataxia and remaining half had symptoms of cerebellar ataxia.

Conclusion: Ataxia secondary to AEDs is seen with both the older and newer drugs. Awareness of the possibility of AEDs induced ataxia can help in early diagnosis and its management.

Keywords

Adverse effect, Carbamazepine, Phenytoin

Epilepsy is one of the major neurological disorders with a prevalence ranging from 2.2 and 10.4 per 1,000 population across different parts of India (1). Ataxia is a common symptom in a variety of conditions associated with epilepsy. There is a complex relationship between epilepsy and cerebellar dysfunction resulting in ataxia. In some conditions both ataxia and epileptic seizures coexist. In most of such cases there is presumably a common aetiology such as metabolic, genetic, or other central nervous system dysfunction (2). Several AEDs are used to control the seizures which have ataxia as common adverse drug effect (2). It can be due to either single therapeutic dose of particular drug, prolonged use of same drug or acute poisoning.

Cerebellar ataxia can be induced by a large number of therapeutic drugs. The cerebellum is prone to adverse effects of drugs such as antiepileptics, benzodiazepines, antineoplastics, lithium salts, and calcineurin inhibitors affecting in particular the cerebellar cortex and Purkinje neurons (3). Dutch registry reported drug-induced ataxia with 93 individual drugs. The number needed to harm was below 10 for benzodiazepines and antineoplastics. Generally, ataxia is reversible, but persistent symptoms can remain for drug like lithium and certain antineoplastics (4). In patients on epileptic drugs the truncal ataxia was associated with longer duration of use of drug, receiving more number of drugs, and had higher serum levels drug levels. Ataxic patients also have relatively lower serum folate levels which could be responsible for ataxia (5). The use of phenytoin and benzodiazepines is associated with higher frequency of ataxia (4). Higher levels of phenytoin are harmful to the cerebellar cortex and Purkinje cells which can result in irreversible damage and/or cerebellar atrophy. Long duration use of phenytoin is a risk factor for ataxia and lead to clinical impairment, if untreated (6). Interestingly, gabapentin is used to treat ataxia due its Gamma-aminobutyric Acid (GABA) GABAergic properties but gabapentin itself can cause ataxia (7). Both their effects could be attributed to the interference with cerebellar GABAergic neurons, particularly Purkinje cells, the output neurons of the cerebellar cortex. During treatment with valproate treatment tremor are more common as adverse event and ataxia could be secondary to hyperammonemic encephalopathy (8).

The exact incidence of ataxia related to antiepileptic is unknown in Indian patients. Apart from ataxia, patient may experience extra pyramidal symptoms, behaviour changes, respiratory depression etc. Hence, this study was carried to study the prevalence of AEDs-induced ataxia, identify the drugs that cause ataxia, and determine the patient clinical profile.

Material and Methods

The longitudinal observational study, was carried out at Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India, from January 2016 to March 2021. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (MGM/IHEC/85/
2016). Written informed consent was taken from all the patients willing to participate in the study.

Inclusion criteria: Patients with seizure disorder on newly initiated AEDs attending the outpatient department within the study duration with complaints of ataxia, with no history of ataxia, and who developed ataxia during the course of other diseases were enrolled in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with history and family history of ataxia, history of alcohol intake were excluded from the study. Patient with history of fever along with ataxia, history of psychological disorders, migraine, childhood ataxia, ataxia due to substance abuse, idiopathic ataxia were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

All patients were subjected to Computed Tomography (CT)/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Brain and those with normal cerebellar findings were included in the study. Based on the time of onset of ataxia patients were divided into three groups: Group A- ataxia developed within 24 hours of onset of drug intake; Group B- ataxia developed within 24 to 72 hours from prescription of drug; Group C- ataxia developed after 72 hours from the time of drug administration. Patients were further classified into those having sensory ataxia and cerebellar ataxia, based on their symptoms (cerebellar ataxia- dyssynergia, dysmetria, dysdiadachokinesia, hypotonia, ataxic gait, swaying to one side; sensory ataxia- proprioception, Rhomberg’s positive, ataxic gait, loss of tendon reflexes, peripheral neuropathy). Patients with ataxic gait, being a common symptom of both cerebellar and sensory ataxia, were classified as mixed ataxia. Patients with gait abnormality as an isolated symptom or ataxic gait with cerebellar findings were allocated to cerebellar ataxia group and those with ataxic gait with additional sensory ataxia were allocated to sensory ataxia group.

The time of clinical resolution of ataxia was noted and patients were classified into three sub-groups: Group 1- Clinical resolution within 72 hours; Group 2- Clinical resolution in 72 to 144 hours; and Group 3- Clinical resolution after 144 hours.

The detailed histories of drug intake, last drug modifications were noted. The types of ataxia based upon clinical symptoms were studied. The times of onset of ataxia, time to resolve ataxia were also noted in this study. The AEDs plasma levels were also documented for these patients who had undergone the antiepileptic blood level estimations. The dose titration for patients were also documented.

Statistical Analysis

All data was collected systematically and results were statistically analysed. Statistical analysis was carried out using Microsoft Excel spreadsheet software program. Continuous variables were expressed as means and standard deviation while categorical variables were expressed as percentages. Charts were used in presenting percentages and proportions.

Results

Out 1600 patients with seizures and on AEDs, 34 developed ataxia. Among these 34 patients 15 were males and 19 females. Of 34, 15 (44.11%) were on Phenytoin, 12 (35.29%) on Carbamazepine, 3 (8.82%) on Gabapentin, 2 (5.88%) on Zonisamide and 2 (5.88%) on Lamotrigine. Dose of these drugs were modified within one day, after one and three weeks and after one month in 9 (26.47%), 7 (20.58%), 12 (35.29%), and 4 (11.76%) patients, respectively. Two patients had presented with acute poisoning. Fifty percent patients had symptoms of sensory and remaining half had symptoms of cerebellar ataxia (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2).

The drug dose was increased in 11 (32.35%) patients. The drugs levels were high and within normal range in 13 (38.23%) and 6 (17.64%), respectively, whereas it was not measured in 15 (44.11%) patients. The duration of onset of ataxia with different AEDs after post drug administration has been depicted in (Table/Fig 3). Ataxia developing after 72 hours from the time of drug administration was seen more commonly and the least within 24 hours. Moreover, ataxia was observed more frequently in female patients. The time of clinical resolution of ataxia has been summarised in (Table/Fig 4). Most patients had clinical resolution of ataxia after 144 hour and least number of patients recovered within 72 hours of onset.

Discussion

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder associated with co-morbid adverse conditions secondary due to disease itself or adverse effects of AEDs. Evidence from experimental, cross-sectional and prospective studies suggest adverse effect of some AEDs on the auditory and vestibular systems which maybe reversible or irreversible (9),(10),(11),(12). Identification and monitoring of patients at high risk for developing audio-vestibular can help in taking preventive and therapeutic step in AEDs induced ataxia (13).

Earlier, ataxia was described as manifestation of various uncoordinated characteristics of different diseases, such as gait, movement, heartbeat, etc. But at present, it is more specifically used to describe the symptoms of motor mismatching synchronisation and balance disorder secondary to the brain, cerebellum, deep sensation (proprioception), vestibular and other systems damage (14). In this study, half the patients had symptoms of sensory ataxia while had symptoms of cerebellar ataxia. Sensory ataxia is usually manifested due to impairment of somatosensory nerve, which causes the interruption of sensory feedback signals resulting in the body incoordination (15). Study showed that patients on different AEDs experience different symptoms of sensory ataxia. Proprioception and ataxic gait was observed in patients on phenytoin carbamazepine and gabapentine. Rhomberg’s +ve sign was seen with all five AEDs in this study. Loss of tendon reflexes was seen with only phenytoin. In none of the groups peripheral neuropathy was observed. There reports of risk of peripheral neuropathy due to AEDs like phenytoin, barbiturate and carbamazepine (16). A clinical study evaluated peripheral nervous system damage using the thermal threshold test at ankle and wrist in epileptic patients and controls. The epileptics had higher threshold consistent with a toxic effect of both drugs on fine peripheral nerve fibers (17). The exact mechanism is not clear but the relationship between folate deficiency has been hypothesised (16).

The risk that AEDs may cause damage to the peripheral nervous system led us to investigate 12 patients on carbamazepine and 12 patients on phenobarbital with the thermal threshold test. The heat and cold thresholds were measured at the end, compared with those in 30 healthy subjects, they proved to be significantly higher. When the two groups of epileptics were compared separately with the controls, their thresholds were always higher. These findings are consistent with a toxic effect of both drugs on fine peripheral nerve fibers. Cerebellar ataxia is a frequent presentation in neurological clinical practice. It may present as chronic and slowly-progressive cerebellar degenerations to the acute cerebellar lesions because of infarction, oedema and haemorrhage. It is characterised by loss of body muscle coordination caused by cerebellar disease. Trunk ataxia often suggests of cerebellar vermis lesions while limb ataxia suggests cerebellar hemisphere lesions (18). In the present study, all patients with cerebellar ataxia on different AEDs showed dyssynergia/dysmetriad/dysdiadachokinesia, except gabapentine and zonisamide. Ataxic gait was observed with phenytoin, carbamazepine and gabapentine. Shanmugarajah PD et al., found that nystagmus and swaying to one side was only seen with phenytoin. Gait, stance and heel-shin slide were the predominant features of cerebellar dysfunction with phenytoin (19).

In this study, the duration of onset of ataxia was 72 hours from the time of drug administration in the most of the AEDs. Ataxia developing within 24 to 72 hours from time drug administration was seen with phenytoin, whereas, ataxia developing within 24 hours of onset of drug intake was seen with only with carbamazepine. The time to clinical resolution of ataxia in the entire population was more than 144 hours post onset of ataxia. However, with carbamazepine the clinical resolution of ataxia ranged from less than 72 hours to more than 144 hours.

Phenytoin is one of the most effective, economical and frequently prescribed AEDs. Its use is decreasing because of availability of new AEDs with better safety profile in terms of long-term adverse effects such as abnormal bone mineral metabolism and potentially irreversible cerebellar ataxia. In the present study, almost 44.1% patients experienced ataxia as an adverse effect, similar to those reported by Shanmugarajah PD et al., (19). Patients with high levels of phenytoin may experience drowsiness, nystagmus, dysarthria, tremor, ataxia and cognitive difficulties. Long-term use of phenytoin is associated with cerebellar degeneration (20). Experimental data is not conclusive and suggest that cerebellar degeneration is because of convulsion mediated cell loss rather than toxicity of phenytoin. However, there is evidence suggesting toxic effects of phenytoin on Purkinje cells in-vitro (9),(10). A study, characterising the relationship between phenytoin-induced ataxia and its concentration in rats, showed that phenytoin in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and brain, unlike serum phenytoin, equilibrates rapidly with site(s) of phenytoin neurotoxicity (21). There exists a relationship between phenytoin concentration and toxic symptoms. In most patients, plasma concentration higher than 30 μg/mL induces ataxia. Ataxia secondary due to phenytoin involves station (standing position) and gait rather than fine motor movements. This study also observed cerebellar ataxia with phenytoin therapy as reported in earlier publications (22),(23).

Carbamazepine is another commonly used drug to control seizures. Its common adverse effects are ataxia, sleep disorders, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, polydipsia, irritability and diplopia. It induces dose-dependent ataxic effects and disorientation at levels of 11-15 mg/L (24). Generally, patients present with dizziness and experience a gaze-evoked nystagmus, action tremor, and ataxia of stance/gait. Impaired conscious state may mask the cerebellar deficits. Half of the patients with overdose develop cerebellar signs (12). These signs may be related to involvement of afferents or efferents to the cerebellum. Elderly patients appear more susceptible to carbamazepine than young patients. Caution should be exercised in patients with pre-existing cerebellar atrophy as they at risk for developing cerebellar signs at lower serum levels. Structural lesions should be looked for in patient on carbamazepine treatment when they develop cerebellar signs. Its common adverse effects are ataxia, sleep disorders, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, polydipsia, irritability and diplopia (12),(25). It was observed that 12 (35.29%) patients in this study on carbamazepine developed ataxia.

Valproate is also one AED which is commonly used. Although rare, it can cause cerebellar ataxia secondary to hyperammonemic encephalopathy. Early diagnosis and quick drug withdrawal of valproate can mitigate this serious reversible complications (26). The neurological adverse effects of Gabapentine are ataxia, fatigue, dizziness, sedation, and somnolence (27). Gabapentin stimulates expression of δGABAA receptors and increases a tonic inhibitory conductance in neurons, which likely contributes to GABAergic effects as gabapentin caused ataxia in wild-type mice but not δ subunit null-mutant mice (28). In the present study, 3 (8.8%) patients on gabapentin had ataxia which was in concurrence with the data quoted in the literature (2).

Out of the total number of epileptic patients (1600) on AEDs, 34 patients developed ataxia. Of these 34 patients, 15 (44.11%) were on Phenytoin, 12 (35.29%) were on Carbamazepine, 3 (8.82%) were on Gabapentin, 2 (5.88%) were on Zonisamide, and 2 (5.88%) were on Lamotrigine. Dose of these drugs were modified within one day, after one and three weeks and after one month in 9 (26.47%), 7 (20.58%), 12 (35.29%), and 4 (11.76%) patients, respectively. Two patients had presented with acute poisoning. Half, 50% (n=17) patients had symptoms of sensory ataxia and remaining half had symptoms of cerebellar ataxia. In this study, both zonisamide and lamotrigene caused ataxia in 2 (5.88%) patients which was lower than the prevalence quote in literature (2). With paucity of data on the prevalence and incidence of cerebellar lesions due to high AEDs levels related to intoxication are still unknown in many cases. Therefore, the physician should be aware of all the AEDs that may be responsible for cerebellar deficits, as drug-induced cerebellar ataxias are common in clinical practice. Moreover, appropriate and immediate treatment measures should be taken in case of high drug levels (3).

Limitation(s)

This study had limitation because of the relatively small sample size. Several aspects of patient’s characteristics were not readily accessible. Sufficient information about drug levels was unavailable as the drug concentration in the plasma was not estimated for all the patients Ataxia and dizziness are often dose-dependent adverse effects, especially with carbamazepine and phenytoin. Therefore, it was not possible to determine whether the ataxia was concentration dependent or not.

Conclusion

Secondary ataxia due to AEDs is observed with both the older and newer drugs, more with phenytoin and carbamazepine. Generally, it is dose dependent and can occur even with normal therapeutic dose. Awareness of the possibility of AEDs induced ataxia and to differentiate it from symptoms of epileptic or other neurological disorder is critical as prompt intervention can mitigate the risk of ataxia. The onset and resolution of ataxia due to different AEDs is variable dyssynergia, dysmetria and dysdiadachokinesia are commonly observed and should be considered in the management of the adverse event.

References

1.
Gourie-Devi M. Epidemiology of neurological disorders in India: Review of background, prevalence and incidence of epilepsy, stroke, Parkinson’s disease and tremors. Neurol India. 2014;62(6):588-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Marcián V, Filip P, Bareš M, Brázdil M. Cerebellar dysfunction and ataxia in patients with epilepsy: Coincidence, consequence, or cause? Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2016;6:376. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Manto M. Toxic agents causing cerebellar ataxias. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;103:201-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Van Gaalen J, Kerstens FG, Maas RP, Härmark L, van de Warrenburg BP. Drug-induced cerebellar ataxia: A systematic review. CNS Drugs. 2014;28(12):1139-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Muñoz-Garcia D, Del Ser T, Bermejo F, Portera A. Truncal ataxia in chronic anticonvulsant treatment. Association with drug-induced folate deficiency. J Neurol Sci. 1982;55(3):305-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Gupta M, Patidar Y, Khwaja GA, Chowdhury D, Batra A, Dasgupta A. Persistent cerebellar ataxia with cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome due to acute phenytoin intoxication: A case report. Neurol Asia. 2013;18(1):107-11.
7.
Gazulla J, Errea JM, Benavente I, Tordesillas CJ. Treatment of ataxia in cortical cerebellar atrophy with the GABAergic drug gabapentin. European Neurology. 2004;52(1):07-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Verma R, Kori P. Valproate-induced encephalopathy with predominant pancerebellar syndrome. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2012;44(1):129. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Kiefer R, Knoth R, Anagnostopoulos J, Volk B. Cerebellar injury due to phenytoin. Identification and evolution of Purkinje cell axonal swellings in deep cerebellar nuclei of mice. Acta Neuropathologica. 1989;77(3):289-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Tauer U, Knoth R, Volk B. Phenytoin alters Purkinje cell axon morphology and targeting in-vitro. Acta Neuropathologica. 1998;95(6):583-91. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Ohmori H, Ogura H, Yasuda M, Nakamura S, Hatta T, Kawano K, et al. Developmental neurotoxicity of phenytoin on granule cells and Purkinje cells in mouse cerebellum. Journal of Neurochemistry. 1999;72(4):1497-506. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Spiller H. Management of Carbamazepine overdose. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2002;17:452-56. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Hamed SA. The auditory and vestibular toxicities induced by antiepileptic drugs. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017;16(11):1281-94. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Bastian AJ. Mechanisms of ataxia. Physical Therapy. 1997;77(6):672-75. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Fadic R, Russell J, Vedanarayanan V, Lehar M, Kuncl R, Johns D. Sensory ataxic neuropathy as the presenting feature of a novel mitochondrial disease. Neurology. 1997;49(1):239-45. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Shorvon SD, Reynolds EH. Anticonvulsant peripheral neuropathy: A clinical and electrophysiological study of patients on single drug treatment with phenytoin, carbamazepine or barbiturates. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1982;45(7):620-26. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Baldini S, Carenini L, Leone M, D’Alessandro G, Bottacchi E. Peripheral neuropathy caused by antiepileptic drugs. Neurophysiological study of the A delta and C fibers. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1992;13(3):233-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Bastian AJ, Martin T, Keating J, Thach W. Cerebellar ataxia: Abnormal control of interaction torques across multiple joints. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1996;76(1):492-509. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Shanmugarajah PD, Hoggard N, Aeschlimann DP, Aeschlimann PC, Dennis GJ, Howell SJ, et al. Phenytoin-related ataxia in patients with epilepsy: Clinical and radiological characteristics. Seizure. 2018;56:26-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Lindvall O, Nilsson B. Cerebellar atrophy following phenytoin intoxication. Annals of Neurology: Official Journal of the American Neurological Association and the Child Neurology Society. 1984;16(2):258-60. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Ramzan I. Pharmacodynamics of phenytoin-induced ataxia in rats. Epilepsy Res. 1990;5(1):80-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Kutt H, Penry JK. Usefulness of blood levels of antiepileptic drugs. Archives of Neurology. 1974;31(5):283-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Moon HJ, Jeon B. Can therapeutic-range chronic phenytoin administration cause cerebellar ataxia? J Epilepsy Res. 2017;7(1):21-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Al Khalili Y SS, Jain S. Carbamazepine Toxicity. [Updated 2022 Jan 20]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507852/.
25.
Ozaras N, Goksugur N, Eroglu S, Tabak O, Canbakan B, Ozaras R. Carbamazepine-induced hypogammaglobulinemia. Seizure. 2012;21(3):229-31. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Juneja A, Anand K. Cerebellar ataxia in epilepsy patient with normal serum phenytoin levels? Suspect hyperammonemia. Neurology India. 2021;69(6):1869. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Calandre EP, Rico-Villademoros F, Slim M. Alpha2delta ligands, gabapentin, pregabalin and mirogabalin: A review of their clinical pharmacology and therapeutic use. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2016;16(11):1263-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Yu J, Wang DS, Bonin RP, Penna A, Alavian-Ghavanini A, Zurek AA, et al. Gabapentin increases expression of δ subunit-containing GABAA receptors. EBioMedicine. 2019;42:203-13.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59941.17618

Date of Submission: Sep 01, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Oct 31, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Dec 12, 2022
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 14, 2022
• Manual Googling: Nov 22, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Dec 07, 2022 (15%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com