Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 86967

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : FC01 - FC05 Full Version

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Regarding Medication use among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinic: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/57897.17609
Rohan Sen, Ananya Mandal, Suman Chattopadhyay, Supreeti Biswas Mondal

1. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Pharmacology, NRS Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, NRS Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, NRS Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 4. Professor, Department of Pharmacology, NRS Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Rohan Sen,
7, Cooper Street, Kolkata-700026, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: senrohan88@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Medication use during pregnancy is a major concern in India and poor awareness is driven by non scientific information sources. Primary care providers play a role in providing information on risk of teratogenic and folate deficiency birth defects.

Aim: To assess Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) of pregnant women attending antenatal clinic regarding medication use and self-medication during pregnancy.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic in a tertiary care teaching hospital of Eastern India from August to October 2021. The study looked at sources of drug information, attitudes regarding medication use and practice of medication use and self-medication among pregnant mothers attending antenatal clinic of the hospital. Consenting women were enrolled in the study and the qualitative data gathered from the women were analysed using tools of descriptive statistics.

Results: This study included 100 pregnant women with mean age of 22±2.0 years of which 42% were primigravida. Of the participants 80% had atleast high school education. Two third of the mothers 66% cited their family members as source of their drug information and 76% were aware of the risks of self-medication during pregnancy. Self medication practice was seen in 25% pregnant women mainly with Paracetamol use for pain or over-the-counter drugs to control acid reflux and morning sickness symptoms. All the participants (100%) took their iron and folic acid supplements as advised.

Conclusion: The pregnant women attending the hospital showed adequate knowledge and satisfactory practices regarding medication use. Counselling of the mothers attending the clinic regarding drug use and possible harms to the mother and baby can help reduce long-term risks.

Keywords

Birth defects, Pregnancy, Self-medication, Teratogenicity

A worldwide effort was launched by the World Health Organisation in 1987 known as Safe Motherhood Initiatives, which aimed to reduce maternal mortality and improve maternal health (1). Improving maternal health is one of the eight-millennium development goals (MDGs) (2). Since 1990, maternal deaths worldwide have dropped by 49%. Under MDG5, countries committed to reducing maternal mortality by three-quarters between 1990 and 2015 (2). One of the main tenets to achieve this goals is to improve antenatal care and studies have shown time and again that better antenatal care can improve pregnancy outcome to a great extent and lead to healthier babies (2).

Medication use during pregnancy is a major concern in India and poor awareness is driven by non-scientific information sources (3). Primary care providers play a role in providing information on risk of teratogenic and folate deficiency birth defects. Around the world medication use during pregnancy remains a cause for concern. Teratogenic drugs are labelled according to their risk of causing foetal harm and those with labels D or X are contraindicated or to be used with extreme caution in pregnant women. Several drugs including some antihypertensives, antiseizure medications and even common over the counter drugs could lead to foetal harm. Timing and rate of exposure to such drugs determine the extent of harm that can be brought about by them (3).

To improve maternal health, barriers that limit access to quality maternal health services must be identified and addressed at all levels of the health system. Health awareness is an important element to enable women to have a more uneventful pregnancy (4),(5),(6). A study from Maharashtra looked into the health related knowledge awareness and practices among pregnant women. One of the aspects they studied was self-medication but source of information regarding drug use during pregnancy had not been studied (4). There were no similar studies on pregnant mothers from Bengal and adjacent areas. Hence present study aimed to fill the knowledge gap regarding awareness for medication use during pregnancy among urban and semi-urban mothers of Eastern India attending a tertiary care Government hospital.

This study was conducted to assess knowledge, attitudes and practice of pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic of a tertiary care teaching hospital towards medication use and self-medication.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in a Tertiary Care teaching Hospital, Kolkata, west Bangal, Eastern India from August 2021 to October 2021. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee before commencing the study and the participants were at less than minimal risk. The participants were assured of confidentiality and anonymity. A sample size of 100 was calculated considering a confidence level of 95% in 50% population prevalence.

Inclusion criteria: All pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic who consented to participate in the study were included.

Exclusion criteria: Those who did not consent were excluded from the study.+

Questionnaire

The data were collected by interviewing all the eligible subjects willing to participate in the study. A questionnaire was framed by the researchers as per requirement of the study from several studies (4),(5),(6) and it was validated by subject experts who were not associated with the study. The questionnaire was translated in Hindi and Bengali and the interviewer assisted the mothers in filling up the questionnaire if they needed [Annexure-1]. There were four questions on the patient demographics and three each regarding knowledge and attitude. For practice area, five questions were framed. Most of the answers were close ended with “yes or no” answers (7 questions) or multiple choice questions (2 questions) and one question was open ended. A blank table was provided for the list of medications and their indications which the patients took without prescription from the antenatal clinic. The interviewer helped the mothers to recall and filled in the list of drugs on the form. Tools of descriptive statistics were used to calculate the data obtained in the questionnaire.

Statistical Analysis

Microsoft Excel version 2010 was used for analysis and data handling. For analysis of the data obtained from the questionnaire, tools of descriptive statistics including average and percentage were used. Bar and pie-charts were used to depict the collected and analysed data.

Results

In this study, the age range of study subjects ranged from 18 to 39 years with mean age of 22±2.0 years. Out of 100 pregnant women, 42% (42) were primi gravida and 17 (17%) had history of miscarriage or stillbirth. 80% participants had atleast high school education while 20% participants (20) had university level education. No illiterate mothers were encountered in this study population (Table/Fig 1).

Out of 100 subjects, 66% (66) women got their information from family members, 25% (25) from local doctors in suburban areas and hospital doctors in urban areas. A total of 5% (5) women got the information from relatives and 4% (4) from their female friends as reported by the participants. Surprisingly none of the participants agreed to have obtained drug related information from TV, internet or news papers (Table/Fig 2).

All the mothers attending the antenatal clinic were provided with free of cost folic acid supplementation throughout pregnancy and iron supplementation from their second trimester. During their antenatal visits they were counselled regarding medication use during pregnancy and also advised to take their iron and folic acid supplements regularly. Mothers participating in this study were asked about their beliefs and 2faiths regarding Iron and Folic Acid supplementation during pregnancy and if it would benefit their babies. All the participants (100%; 100) believed that the iron folic acid supplements that they were provided would benefit their babies and they adhered to the advice regarding these supplements from the antenatal clinic.

Most of the participants, 76% were found to be aware of risks of self-medication and also the harm that can occur to themselves and their unborn babies if they took medications without advice from the antenatal clinics. “History of addictions (mainly chewing tobacco) was reported in 17% (17) participants of which only five participants reported to have abstained from their addiction on account of their pregnancy. No history of alcohol use was elicited from the participants This was obtained on interview (Question 3 Part E)”.

When asked related to what they considered to be the best and most reliable source of information regarding drug use during pregnancy, all of the women (100%) stated that doctors and healthcare professionals are the most reliable source of drug information.

All the participants adhered to the prescriptions from the antenatal clinic (100%; 100). 30% participants confessed to have self-medicated themselves at some point during their pregnancy. Practice of self-medication was found to be minimum among the 42% primigravida mothers and the 17% mothers with history of pregnancy loss compared to others. Participants were most likely to take medicines without prescriptions during their first trimester of pregnancy 15 (50%) of 30 mothers) compared to their second and third trimesters 11 (36.66%) and 4 (13.33%) mothers respectively (Table/Fig 3).

Most common cause for self medication was use of over the counter Paracetamol for fever or pain (in 25% mothers). Other reasons for self-medication were gastrointestinal discomfort such as acid reflux and morning sickness. It was noted that 9% and 8% women respectively were consuming unidentified Ayurvedic, Herbal or Homeopathic medicines respectively for self-identified anemia or weakness and fatigue. Details of the medications commonly used without prescriptions among the participants along with their cited reasons is shown in (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

This study reveals that almost one in three women (30%) have used medications without prescriptions during their pregnancy. Self medication during pregnancy is cause for concern and several studies have reported on attitudes towards medication use among pregnant women (7),(8),(9),(10),(11),(12). This is one finding that is cause for concern. Studies from around the world have shown that overall prevalence of self medication among pregnant women is around 32% (10). In yet another report (13), globally 81.2% women have been found to take some medication (either prescribed or over-the-counter) during their pregnancy with 65% resorting to self-medication atleast once during their pregnancy. The significance of high rates of self-medication especially accompanied by a lack of awareness regarding the possible harm of self-medication and un-advised medicine use during pregnancy, could mean significant risk to both the mother and the baby.

This study population included women of an average age of 22 years and this was similar in two other studies reported earlier by Sanjel S et al., (7) and Patel BB et al., (4) in AFMC Pune. A younger age as well a lack of higher education predisposes a pregnant mother to rely upon advise from family members and knowledge regarding medication use during pregnancy may be inadequate. The current study population had 80% mothers with atleast high school education. Rangwala PP et al., (14) conducted a similar study on self-medication among pregnant mothers in Gujarat. They noted that younger, illiterate and multigravida were more likely to self-medicate during pregnancy than those who were older, had atleast secondary education or were primi gravida. In their study they found that only 15.4% mothers with minimum education self-medicated. Since the current study population was semi urban and mostly educated, the number of women self medicating was significantly higher.

This study showed that source of information regarding medication use in two thirds of the participants was from family members and only one in four mothers relied upon doctors for information regarding drug use. Rangwala PP et al., (14) working with a sample of pregnant women from Gujarat found that almost 75% depended upon the doctors or pharmacists for drug information. Banzal N et al., (15), in their study on women from Gujarat found only 8.5% women self-medicating. They noted that of these 3% relied upon chemists for drug information. This was a significant finding in this current study for which the participants were counselled. They were urged to seek out authentic sources of drug information.

Banzal N et al., (15) reported that only 9% of their study population of 200 women were aware of the effects of medications taken during pregnancy on the unborn foetus. Rangwala PP et al., (14) found that only 4.3% of their population of 303 mothers were aware of the harmful effects of drugs on the foetus. This current study however showed that 76% of the mothers knew that taking medicines without prescription during pregnancy could harm their unborn babies. One of the reasons for this deviation from earlier studies could be the setting of this study where most of the women have atleast high school education and live in an urban metropolitan city.

In their study on self medication practices and attitudes among pregnant mothers, Atmadani RN et al., (16) reported various levels of awareness and attitudes regarding self medication among pregnant women. They found 61.5% of their study population believed that women should refrain from medication use during pregnancy to protect their unborn babies. On the other hand 63.1% mothers also believed that not taking medicines for an illness during pregnancy and the untreated illness could also damage the pregnancy. A further 56.5% mothers disagreed with the fact that all medicines can cause harm to the foetus. In our study all the participating mothers believed that the medications and supplements prescribed from the antenatal clinic would benefit their babies and thus they adhered to the advice given by the health care professionals. Devkota R et al., (5) in Pokhara report a similar study on medication use among pregnant mothers. They reported in their study that with rise in health awareness the adherence to folic acid supplementation and adherence to prescribed medication also improved.

Medication use during pregnancy plays a role in outcomes of pregnancy as is seen in different studies from around the world (8),(9),(10),(11). In eastern India however we did not find studies looking in depth into attitudes and practices of self-medication during pregnancy especially with use of indigenous medication. Beyond the common taboos which women are susceptible to, during their pregnancy most women are not very well aware of drug use and the harm it could cause during pregnancy (12).

Rangwala PP et al., (14) working with a sample of pregnant women from Gujarat found that most women self-medicated for headache, fever, common cold, cough, nausea, vomiting, body ache etc. The current study also noted that fever, pain, acid reflux, morning sickness were common conditions for which the women self-medicated. Atmadani RN et al., (16) in their study on 333 pregnant women from Malang, Indonesia also reported common ailments for which treatment sought included nausea, vomiting, common cold, fever, pain etc. They reported that 10.3% of their study population took the medication during their first trimester. Several other studies looking into self-medication during pregnancy reported similar findings [17-18].

The current study showed that 50% of the self-medication took place during first trimester. This study also identified 9% and 8% use of Ayurvedic, herbal and Homeopathic medications. Banzal N et al., (15) in their study reported 1% women self-medicating with Ayurvedic medication. Other studies have not commented on the use of alternate systems of medication. It was noted that 17 participants were addicted to tobacco and 5 of them did not attempt to abstain during pregnancy. Studies have shown a global prevalence of tobacco use during pregnancy is 2.6% (95% CI 1.8-3.6) with highest prevalence in South East Asian region (5.1%; 1.3-10.9%) (19). The findings from the current study corroborate with these results.

Limitation(s)

Findings of the study can only be applied on suburban and urban women, attending antenatal services, and there is a possibility of recall bias among study participant.

Conclusion

Baseline KAP study of medication use among pregnant women showed adequate knowledge and satisfactory practices regarding medication use. Thirty participants (30%) had self-medicated themselves at some point during their pregnancy in present study. Counselling of the mothers attending the ANC regarding drug use and possible harms to the mother and baby could help reduce long-term risks. However, this study may act as a preliminary survey due to the scarcity of published data regarding the ANC care and self-medication among pregnant women from Eastern India.

Future studies with larger sample size and specific intervention program need to be planned and conducted to improve the maternal health practices and eventually improve the health status of mother and baby.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank and acknowledge Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of NRS medical college and hospital for their support throughout the study.

References

1.
Safe Motherhood-A Review. The Safe Motherhood Initiatives, 1987-2005 World Bank Report. New York: Family Care International; (Internet) 2007 (accessed at 2022 May 17) 12. Available from: https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/ en/450251468177862838/pdf/34395.pdf.
2.
The Millennium Development Goals Report 2011. New York: United Nations; 2011(accessed at 2022 May 17) 28-36. Available from: https://www.un.org/ millenniumgoals/pdf/(2011_E)%20MDG%20Report%202011_Book%20LR.pdf.
3.
Schwarz EB, Santucci A, Borrero S, Akers AY, Nikolajski C, Gold MA, et al. Perspectives of primary care clinicians on teratogenic risk counselling. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009;85(10):858-63. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Patel BB, Gurmeet P, Sinalkar DR, Pandya KH, Mahen A, Singh N, et al. A study on knowledge and practices of antenatal care among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at a Tertiary Care Hospital of Pune, Maharashtra. Med J DY Patil Univ. 2016;9(3):354-62. [crossref]
5.
Devkota R, Khan GM, Alam K, Devkota D. Impacts of counselling on knowledge, attitude and practice of medication use during pregnancy. BMJ Pregnancy & Childbirth. 2017;17(1):131. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Kamuhabwa A, Jalal R. Drug use in pregnancy: Knowledge of drug dispensers and pregnant women in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Indian J Pharmacol. 2011;43(3):345-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Sanjel S, Ghimire RH, Pun K. Antenatal care practices in Tamang community of hilly area in Central Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2011;9(34):2:34. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Tefera GY, Gebresillasie, Mersha AG, Belachew SA. Beliefs and risk awareness on medications among pregnant women attending the antenatal care unit in ethiopia university hospital. Overestimating the risks is another dread. Front Public Health. 2020; 8(28):01-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Abasiubong F, Bassey EA, Udobang JA, Akinbami OS, Udoh SB, Idung AU, et al. Self-medication: Potential risks and hazards among pregnant women in Uyo, Nigeria. Pan Afr Med Journal. 2012;13:15.
10.
Mohseni M, Azami-Aghdash S, Sheyklo SG, Moosavi A, Nakhaee M, Pournaghi- Azar F, et al. Prevalence and reasons of self-medication in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2018; 6(4):272-84.
11.
Pereira G, Surita FG, Ferracini AC, Madeira C, Oliveira LS, Mazzola PG, et al. Self-medication among pregnant women: Prevalence and associated factors. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:04-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Marwa KJ, Njalika, Ruganuza D, Katabalo D, Erasmus K. Self-medication among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at Makongoro health centre in Mwanza, Tanzania: A challenge to health systems. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth. 2018;18:16. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Lupattelli A, Spigset O, Twigg MJ, Zagorodnikova K, Mårdby AC, Moretti ME, et al. Medication use in pregnancy: A cross-sectional, multinational web-based study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(2):e004365. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Rangwala PP, Chokshi AS, Shah RK, Thakkar AS, Thakker YG, Dumra GH, et al. Self-medication amongst pregnant women in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2021;10(1):256-61. [crossref]
15.
Banzal N, Saxena K, Dalal M, Srivastava SK. A study to assess awareness amongst pregnant women about the effects of drugs on the fetus and self-medication. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2017;6(4):924-27. [crossref]
16.
Atmadani RN, Nkoka O, Yunita. Self-medication and knowledge among pregnant women attending primary healthcare services in Malang, Indonesia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:42. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Niriayo YL, Mohammed K, Asgedom SW, Demoz GT, Wahdey S, et al. Self- medication practice and contributing factors among pregnant women. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(5):e0251725. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Sema FD, Deres GA, Melese EA, Nassa DD, Kifle ZD. Prevalence and associated factors of self medication among pregnant women on Antenatal care follow-up at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia: A Cross sectional study. Int J Reprod Med. 2020;2020:01-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Barakoti R, Ghimire A, Pandey AR, Baral DD, Pokharel PK. Tobacco use during pregnancy and its associated factors in a Mountain District of Eastern Nepal: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Front Public Health. 2017;5:01-06.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/57897.17609

Date of Submission: May 21, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jul 25, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Nov 01, 2022
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 25, 2022
• Manual Googling: Aug 09, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Oct 29, 2022 (22%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com