Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 185345

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : DC11 - DC16 Full Version

Microbiological Profile of Urinary Tract Infections in Males: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62386.17635
V Haritha, Sanjeev D Rao, Syed Shafeequr Rahman

1. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Telangana Institute of Medical Science and Research, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Malla Reddy Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 3. Professor, Department of Microbiology, Malla Reddy Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Correspondence Address :
V Haritha,
HIG 67, Ushodaya Enclave, Madinaguda, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
E-mail: harithagunturu@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) are uncommon among men. It is because the male urethra is longer and is away from the anal opening. Moreover, the perianal area is dry, and the prostatic secretion prevents from occurring of any infection. Hence, if men suffer from UTI, it is considered as a complicated infection. Complicated UTIs are difficult to treat and are more prone to treatment failures. Microorganisms causing these infections have a wide spectrum ranging from a variety of both Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms. Early diagnosis and treatment of UTIs, plays a major role in preventing the spread of infection to the upper urinary tract.

Aim: To determine the microbiological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern from urine samples of male patients.

Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study was done for a period of two years (1/3/2019 to 31/4/2021) in the Department of Microbiology, Malla Reddy Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. Urine samples from male inpatients and outpatients suffering from various clinical conditions received in the microbiology laboratory were processed and analysed. These samples were cultured by conventional semiquantitative methods and the organisms were identified using standard biochemical reactions. Antibiotic sensitivity testing was done on Mueller Hinton agar by Kirby-Bauer’s disk diffusion technique. Clinical history, associated conditions and co-morbidities were noted from the case sheets of all the culture positive patients to identify the risk factors which made them prone to UTIs. The data was descriptive and percentages were calculated for all the numerical data obtained.

Results: Total 304 urine samples received, 104 (34%) were found to be positive for bacterial and fungal isolates. E. coli (44%) was the predominant organism, followed by Klebsiella spp. (15%) among the Gram-negative bacteria isolated. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (5%) was the predominant organism among the Gram-positive bacteria followed by Staphylococcus aureus (4%) and Enterococcus spp. (4%). A 84.8% of E. coli and 68% of Klebsiella spp. were Extended-spectrum beta-Lactamase (ESBL) enzymes producing organisms. An analysis of the health conditions of the patients who were culture positive showed that 28% of patients had signs and symptoms suggestive of UTI. Diabetes (25%), hypertension (20%), and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) (5%) were observed commonly in patients above 60 years.

Conclusion: The UTI in male patients are quite uncommon as in female patients. The microbiological profile and drug sensitivity pattern of these organisms causing the infection is similar to that in female patients suffering from UTI. But, as UTI in males is considered a complicated infection thorough investigation of these patients for various health conditions like diabetes mellitus, hypertension and BPH has to be done, particularly in elderly males. This helps in initiating prompt treatment to prevent recurrent UTIs and drug resistance.

Keywords

Antibiotic sensitivity testing, Associated factors, Bacteria, Co-morbidities, Fungi, Urinary tract infections

The Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) are quite common among women. Various anatomical and physiological factors make them more prone to UTIs. The incidence of UTI is much higher in females during adolescence and childbearing years (1). The incidence of UTI in men approaches that of women only in men older than 60 years. Young men rarely develop UTIs, and the prevalence of bacteriuria is 0.1% or less. There is an early peak incidence during the first three months of life; in neonates, UTIs occur more frequently in boys than in girls (with a male-to-female ratio of 1.5:1). The incidence of UTI in adult males younger than 50 years is low (approximately five to eight per year per 10,000). In men older than 50 years, the incidence of UTI rises dramatically (range, 20-50% prevalence), because of enlargement of the prostate, debilitation and subsequent instrumentation of the urinary tract (2).

The UTIs can be simple and complicated. Uncomplicated UTIs can be managed on an outpatient basis with a good prognosis. Whereas, complicated UTIs are associated with recurrent infections, treatment failures and Multidrug Resistance (MDR) (2). All UTIs in immunocompromised patients, males and those associated with fevers, stones, sepsis, urinary obstruction, catheters, or involving the kidneys are considered complicated infections. In other words, infections occur despite the presence of anatomical protective measures (UTIs in males are by definition considered complicated UTIs). Treatment failure and longer duration of antibiotic therapy are needed in these patients when compared to female patients (3),(4).

If left untreated, they may give rise to various complications like ascending infections, bacteraemia and organ damage. Hence, it is very important to diagnose and detect UTI at an early stage in this category of patients. Methods such as urinalysis, gram staining and urine culture used for the diagnosis of UTI. The presence of 2-5 or more White Blood Cells (WBCs) or 15 bacteria per High-power Field (HPF) in a centrifuged urine sediment gives a possible clue to the diagnosis of UTI. The presence of leukocyte esterase on a dipstick test is a rapid screening for pyuria; it is 57-96% sensitive and 94-98% specific for identifying pyuria. Urine culture remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of UTI. Collected urine should be immediately sent for culture; if not, it should be refrigerated at 4°C. The exact number of bacteria in a urine culture that is needed to define UTI in males is much lower than the threshold for females and positive results are seen, if there are more than 1000 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/mL of urine. However, a value of more than 10,000 CFU/mL is considered significant. Proteinuria is commonly observed in UTIs, but the proteinuria is usually low-grade. In addition to these methods, imaging is also useful in certain cases of UTI, especially in males. Patients in the older age group, who are toxic, diabetic, or immunocompromised may be at risk for emphysematous pyelonephritis; hence, radiographic studies {e.g., Kidney, Ureters, Bladder (KUB)} may be necessary to exclude this possibility (2). Present study focuses on UTIs in males, the uropathogenic organisms causing them, their sensitivity profile, and the various risk factors and associated conditions that make male patients more prone to UTIs.

Material and Methods

The present descriptive cross-sectional study was done for a period of two years from March 2019 to April 2021 in the Department of Microbiology, Malla Reddy Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. All patient details and samples were collected following the Institute’s Ethical Approval (IEC/MRIMS/HYD/2018-19/32).

A total of 304 samples were received in given time period and further analysed.

Inclusion criteria: All the urine samples of male patients received in the microbiology laboratory during the study period.

Exclusion criteria:

• A CFU/mL of less than 105 isolated in culture.
• Polymicrobial growth (mixed growth) of more than two organisms in culture media.

Study Procedure

Urine samples of male inpatients and outpatients suffering from various clinical conditions received in the microbiology laboratory were analysed and processed. Semiquantitative culture of urine specimen was done on HiChrome UTI agar and MacConkey agar. Plates were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C and any growth in the culture media were noted. Identification of the organisms was done using standard conventional biochemical reactions and antibiotic sensitivity testing was done by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. All the methods were followed as per the standard textbook of microbiology (5). Antibiotic sensitivity testing for ESBL producing enzyme detection was done by disc diffusion methods on Muller-Hinton agar as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (6). Antifungal susceptibility testing for fungal isolates was not done.

Clinical history of patients, whose urine sample showed growth, was collected from the case sheets for any signs and symptoms, pertaining to UTI and to note any other associated health conditions or comorbidities that made them prone to UTIs.

Statistical Analysis

The data was descriptive and percentages were calculated for all the numerical data obtained.

Results

total of 304 urine samples of male patients suffering from various clinical conditions were analysed and processed in the microbiology laboratory. Out of 304 urine samples received, 104 (34%) were found to be positive for bacterial and fungal isolates. In 200 (66%) patients, no bacterial growth was obtained.

The youngest patient in the present study was two-year-old and the oldest patient was 89-year-old. Culture positive rate was more in patients belonging to the age group of 10-15 years and in 60-70 years. The (Table/Fig 1) shows the distribution of patients according to the age group (green line) and the age-wise distribution of patients whose urine samples were culture positive (redline). E. coli 46 (44%) was the predominant organism isolated in culture followed by Klebsiella spp. 16 (15%), Pseudomonas 7 (7%), Acinetobacter 4 (4%), Proteus spp. 3 (3%), Enterobacter 2 (2%), Citrobacter 2 (2%) and Alcaligenes 1 (1%). Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) 5 (5%) was the predominant organism among the Gram-positive bacteria followed by Staphylococcus aureus 4 (4%) and Enterococcus spp. 4 (4%). Total 10 (10%) species of Candida were isolated. The (Table/Fig 2) shows the various organisms isolated in culture.

The results of antibiotic sensitivity tests were as follows:

Gram-negative organism: E. coli was the predominant isolate. Among the 46 isolates of E. coli, 39 (84.8%) were ESBL enzymes producing organisms. Total 16 species of Klebsiella were isolated among them 11 (68.75%) were ESBL’s. All isolates of E. coli and Klebsiella were sensitive to carbapenems. The (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4) depicts the sensitivity and resistance patterns of Gram-negative organisms where highest sensitivity found in E. coli (96%).

Gram-positive organism: Nine isolates of Staphylococcus and four isolates of Enterococcus were the Gram-positive organisms obtained in this study. Amongst the nine isolates of Staphylococcus, four were Staphylococcus aureus and five were CoNS. Three isolates were Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and all five isolates of CoNS were Methicillin-resistant (MRCoNS).

The (Table/Fig 5) shows the sensitivity pattern of Staphylococcus aureus, CoNS, and Enterococcus, respectively.

Eight Candida albicans and two non albicans Candida were isolated in the study. However, antifungal sensitivity testing of these isolates was not done.

Symptomatology: An analysis of various health conditions noted from the case sheets of the patients who were culture positive showed that 28% of patients had signs and symptoms suggestive of UTI. They were fever, dysuria, frequency, burning micturition and low back pain.

Nephritic syndrome (3%), renal calculi (3%), epididymo-orchitis (4%), undescended testis (1%), marfan syndrome (1%), Lesch-Nyhan syndrome (1%), phimosis (1%), fournier’s (1%), hydrocoele (1%), congenital acyanotic heart disease (1%) and obstructive inguinal hernia (1%) were commonly associated factors in children. Chronic renal disease (2%), diabetes (25%), hypertension (20%), and BPH (5%), were observed commonly in patients above 45 years. A 17% of patients had pyrexia of unknown origin. A 14% of patients who were culture positive had no signs and symptoms suggestive of UTI (asymptomatic bacteriuria). A 12 (13%) patients had an indwelling catheter for more than five days. They were considered catheter-associated UTIs. The (Table/Fig 6) shows the associated clinical conditions found in urine culture positive patients with the age-wise distribution.

Discussion

Though, a lot of literature and data is available about UTIs in women, studies showing the microbiological profile and resistance pattern, exclusively in male patients are few in number. The present study was conducted to know about the organisms causing UTI in men, and also the associated clinical conditions. As UTI in males is considered complicated, coexisting clinical conditions have to be investigated and treated with appropriate antibiotic therapy to prevent a recurrence.

In the present study, culture positive rate obtained was 34%. Linhares I et al., in their 10-year surveillance study on community-acquired UTI, obtained a bacterial isolation rate of 21.5% (7). Similarly, a study done by Magliano E et al., for a period of around two years in North Italy found the culture positive rate to be 22.6% (8). These findings show that, although the majority of UTIs are seen in women, men are also affected at a significant rate. A urine culture should always be obtained when a male patient presents with a suspected UTI because UTIs in men are considered complicated by definition and warrant at least seven days of antibiotic therapy. Hence, diagnosing UTIs and treating them promptly is important.

Socio-demographic characters: As the literature suggests that UTI in males is common in the extremes of life, this study shows a high rate of culture positivity in urine samples was seen in the two extreme age groups of patients i.e., 0-20 years (33%) and patients >50 years (44%). This correlates with the study done by Linhares I et al., who reported an isolation rate of 11.3% in elderly males (7). In another study done by Vigila CR et al., in South India showed that elderly men are affected by UTI to an extent of 40.53% (age group 61-90 years) (9). Various health conditions like diabetes, decreasing immunity due to age, and enlarged prostate, resulting in the retention of urine are some of the reasons for this. A study by Raval R et al., in patients belonging to the age group of 10-29 years, showed a 10% (8 out of 80) risk for the development of UTI. The age group of 30-49 years, showed a greater risk of developing UTI 19 (23.7%) and a dramatic increase in the incidence of UTI was seen in 50-69 years with 33 (41.25%) out of 80. Beyond the age of 70 years, the incidence of UTI declined to 22.5% (10).

Organisms isolated: E. coli and Klebsiella spp. were the predominant organisms amongst the Gram-negative isolates in the present study. The (Table/Fig 7) shows a comparison between the percentages of various isolates obtained in the present study and other studies [8,10-17]. E. coli was the predominant isolate in the present study and various other studies are shown in the table above. No change in the predominant isolate was observed. E. coli remains the most common cause of UTI in both males and females.

Gram-negative bacteria: Among the Gram-negative isolates of E. coli and Klebsiella, 84.8% and 68.75%, respectively were ESBL enzymes producing organisms in present study. Gebremariam G et al., demonstrated ESBL enzyme producers in 27.8% of the E. coli and 33.3% of K. pneumonia isolates in their study (12). In another study by Bhargava K et al., in the Northeast part of India, it was found that 40.4% of E. coli and none of the K. pneumoniae were ESBL producing organisms (18). Aggarwal R et al., reported 40% of E. coli and 54.54% of Klebsiella spp. to be ESBL producers (19). Sood S and Gupta R, reported an ESBL production rate of 23.83% in E.coli strains and 8.69% in Klebsiella strains (20). The high incidence of ESBL producing organisms in the present study was probably because the study was done in a tertiary care center.

When tested for third generation cephalosporins, E. coli showed a resistance rate of 96%, 98%, and 89% to cefepime, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone, respectively, whereas, Klebsiella spp. showed a resistance rate of 87%, 87%, and 75% to cefepime, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone. However, the organisms were found to be sensitive to carbapenems in this study. Fenta A et al., also found a similar pattern in their study done on children. They reported that 97.7% of the Gram-negative isolates were susceptible to meropenem (21).

Biswas R et al., demonstrated a high percentage of sensitivity (90%) to carbapenems in their study when tested against Gram-negative isolates (22). Muzammil M et al., in their study done in a tertiary care center also found a similar sensitivity pattern. A total of 21 (100%) of the E. coli isolates, were sensitive to polymyxin B, colistin and ertapenem, 15 (71.4%) were sensitive to imipenem, and 13 (61.9%) isolates were sensitive to meropenem (23). Inappropriate treatment of patients by not choosing the correct antibiotic and right dosage can cause recurrent UTI infections associated with MDR. The propensity of some uropathogenic E. coli to form biofilms is also another factor that favors the spread of drug resistance in these organisms.

Gram-positive bacteria: Amongst the nine isolates of Staphylococcus, four isolates were S. aureus and five were CoNS. Of these 8 (89%) of the isolates were MRSA. Muzammil M et al., in their study detected MRSA in three (5.7%) patients (23). Fenta A et al., in their study done on children observed an MDR rate of about 33.33% in S. aureus (21). Mishra PP et al., in their study found resistance against oxacillin was 61.6% and to vancomycin, it was 15.4% (24). However, in the present study, all the isolates were found to be 100% sensitive to vancomycin.

Risk Factors

Unlike women, men suffering from UTIs need to be thoroughly investigated to find out the underlying aetiology to prevent them from suffering from complications. Hence, present study also tried to evaluate the associated factors and conditions which made these male patients prone to UTI.

Age group of 1-30 years: Infants and children present with atypical symptoms and most of the time fever is the only complaint in these patients. Prompt diagnosis and initiation of treatment must be done to prevent permanent renal scarring and damage.

Epididymo-orchitis (4%), nephritic syndrome (3%), renal calculi (3%), undescended testis (1%), marfan syndrome (1%), Lesch-Nyhan syndrome (1%) and congenital acyanotic heart disease (1%), were commonly associated factors in children and young adults in our study. Lesch-Nyhan syndrome is a rare inborn error of purine metabolism characterised by the absence or deficiency of the activity of the enzyme hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (25). Uric acid levels are abnormally high in these patients and sodium urate crystals may accumulate in the joints and kidneys. This condition most often affects males. In present study, we had a two-year-old child with this syndrome who presented with recurrent UTIs.

The presence of renal calculi can obstruct the urinary flow which leads to UTIs, pyelonephritis and renal scarring. In the present study, three patients in the younger and middle age groups who were suffering from renal calculi. A study by Raval R et al., in rural India found renal stones as a risk factor for UTI in 6 (6.8%) and congenital anomalies in 3 (3.2%) of the patients (10).

A study by Gulati S et al., UTI in children with nephrotic syndrome found UTI to be a common infection (40.26%) in children (26). In present study, nephrotic syndrome was found as an associated risk factor in 3% of patients who belonged to the 1-30 years age group. A 14% of patients who were culture positive in the present study had no signs and symptoms suggestive of UTI (asymptomatic bacteriuria). Akhtar A et al., reported an incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in 31.9% (27).

Age group of 31-60 years: In this study, diabetes and hypertension were the commonly associated factors in the middle age group of patients. Diabetes was seen in 18% of the patients and hypertension was a risk factor in 16% of the patients. A similar pattern was seen in a study done by Raval R et al., in rural India who found that in the 30-49 years age group, diabetes mellitus was the most dominating risk factor, and its incidence was 19 (23.5%) (10). Another study done by Akhtar A et al., found diabetes mellitus in 43.1% and hypertension in 33.9% of the patients (27).

Patients with long-term diabetes with improper metabolic control have autonomous neuropathy which leads to inadequate bladder drainage which contributes to UTIs. Moreover, drug-resistant pathogens are commonly seen in these patients. Literature suggests that men with hypertension are more likely to have increased prostatic volume. Their International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) also increases with age. Hence, men with hypertension have a significant risk of acquiring UTI.

Age group of 61-90 years: In the present study, the incidence of hypertension and diabetes in this age group of patients was found to be 7% and 4%, respectively. A significant reduction in the incidence rate of diabetes and hypertension was seen in these patients when compared to those in the 31-60 years age group. Raval R et al., observed a similar pattern of decrease in the incidence of diabetes mellitus from 41.6-7.5% in the 70-89 years age group (10).

Chronic renal disease (1%) and BPH (5%) were the other conditions seen in these patients. BPH was observed to be the dominating factor in this category of patients. Various epidemiological studies show that bacteriuria is commonly observed in men with BPH, with a prevalence range of 4.4-44.7% (28). A study done by Akhtar A et al., found prostatitis as a risk factor in 6.4% of geriatric patients (27). BPH and bladder outlet obstruction are commonly seen in patients above 65 years. This leads to urine retention and as a result, they are more prone to UTIs, calculi formation, haematuria and damage to bladder walls and kidneys. Hence, it is always ideal to rule out any UTI in this age group of patients before subjecting them to any urological manipulations like Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP). Asymptomatic bacteriuria is also common in these patients hence routine screening is advised.

Limitation(s)

In the present study, antifungal sensitivity testing was not done due to limited resources. This would have given information about the antifungal resistance prevalent in the community. Another limitation was, we focussed only on the symptomatology of the patients who were culture positive. Hence, a comparison between the symptoms of those who were culture negative yet showed signs and symptoms of UTIs could not be made.

Conclusion

The UTI in male patients is complicated and must be evaluated thoroughly and always an attempt must be made to investigate the underlying and associated health conditions in these patients. The bacteriological profile and drug resistance patterns in these patients did not differ from the female patients suffering from UTI. However, certain risk factors like the association of renal calculi with UTI are common in males. The age of the patient also should be the criteria because certain conditions like diabetes, hypertension and BPH are seen with increasing age. Timely treatment of these patients based on the antibiotic susceptibility report will prevent complications like ascending UTIs, sepsis, multiorgan involvement and treatment failure with drug-resistant organisms.

References

1.
Minardi D, D’Angelo G, Cantoro D, Conti A, Muzzonigro G. Urinary tract infections in women: Etiology and treatment options. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:333-43. Doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S11767. Epub 2011 Apr 19. PMID: 21674026; PMCID: PMC3108201. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Brusch JL. Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) in Males- Clinical Presentation. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Jan 02, 2020. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/231574-overview.
3.
Sabih A, Leslie SW. Complicated Urinary Tract Infections. 2022 Nov 28. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan. PMID: 28613784.
4.
Seminario JL, Aggarwal G, Sweetser S. 26-year-old man with recurrent urinary tract infections. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(6):557-60. Doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0600. PMID: 21628619; PMCID: PMC3104916. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Mackie & McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology by Collee, 14th edition page no. 84-90.
6.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 26th ed. CLSI supplement M100S (ISBN 1-56238-923-8 [Print]; ISBN 1-56238- 924-6 [Electronic]).
7.
Linhares I, Raposo T, Rodrigues A, Almeida A. Frequency and antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacteria implicated in community urinary tract infections: A ten-year surveillance study (2000-2009). BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Magliano E, Grazioli V, Deflorio L, Leuci AI, Mattina R, Romano P, et al. Gender and age-dependent etiology of community-acquired urinary tract infections. Scientific World Journal. 2012;2012:349597. Doi: 10.1100/2012/349597. Epub 2012 Apr 26. PMID: 22629135; PMCID: PMC3351074. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Vigila CR, Athinarayanan G, Mariselvam R, Dhasarathan P, Ranjitsingh AJA. Epidemiology of urinary tract infection in South India. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences. 2020;1(1):25-32. [crossref]
10.
Raval R, Verma R, Kareliya H. Clino-pathological features of urinary tract infection in rural India. Advances in Infectious Diseases. 2015;5:132-39. Doi: 10.4236/aid.2015.54016. [crossref]
11.
Kavitha J, Aravind MA, Jayachandran G, Priya S. Risk factors for urinary tract infection in pediatric patients. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2018;5:184-89. [crossref]
12.
Gebremariam G, Legese H, Woldu Y, Araya T, Hagos K, GebreyesusWasihun A. Bacteriological profile, risk factors and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of symptomatic urinary tract infection among students of Mekelle University, northern Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):950. Doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4610-2. PMID: 31703645; PMCID: PMC6842233. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Kirtilaxmi B, Padmavathy M, Malini J, Navaneeth BV. Microbiological profile and antibiogram of uropathogens in pediatric age group. Int J Health Allied Sci [serial online] 2015. https://www.ijhas.in/text.asp?2015/4/1/61/149280. [crossref]
14.
Gamit SC, Singel HV, Jadeja MI, Jain AA, Jain JN, Jain KP, et al. Bacteriological profile and antibiotics sensitivity pattern of patients with urinary tract infectionin tertiary care center, Pipariya, Vadodara, Gujarat. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2022;16(4):2576-79. Doi: 10.22207/JPAM.16.4.24. [crossref]
15.
Kumar V, Singh RKN, Verma PK, Bhat NK, Shrivastava Y, Yhoshu E, et al. Clinico-microbiological profile and clinical predictor of urinary tract infection in children: A single-center study from Himalayan foothills. Cureus. 2023;15(1):e33289. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.33289. [crossref]
16.
Malik N, Faisal A, Munir S, Riaz S. Clinical and microbiological profile of urinary tract infection in male diabetic patients. J Microbiol Exp. 2020;8(1):30-34. Doi: 10.15406/jmen.2020.08.00282. [crossref]
17.
Mbwambo HJ, Mbwambo OJ, Bright FB, Charles AC. Microbiological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among patients with urinary tract infection in northern Tanzania. Doi: 10.30574/gscbps.2021.16.2.0226. [crossref]
18.
Bhargava K, Nath G, Bhargava A, Kumari R, Aseri GK, Jain N. Bacterial profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of uropathogens causing urinary tract infection in the eastern part of Northern India. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:965053. Doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.965053. PMID: 36016776; PMCID: PMC9396120. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Aggarwal R, Chaudhary U, Sikka R. Detection of extended spectrum β-lactamase production among uropathogens. J Lab Physicians. 2009;1(1):07-10. Doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.44423. PMID: 21938241; PMCID: PMC3167965. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Sood S, Gupta R. Antibiotic resistance pattern of community-acquired uropathogens at a tertiary care hospital in Jaipur, Rajasthan. Indian J Community Med. 2012;37(1):39-44. Doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.94023. PMID: 22529539; PMCID: PMC3326806. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Fenta A, Dagnew M, Eshetie S, Belachew T. Bacterial profile, antibiotic susceptibility pattern and associated risk factors of urinary tract infection among clinically suspected children attending at Felege-Hiwot comprehensive and specialized hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. A prospective study. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):673. Doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05402-y. PMID: 32938424; PMCID: PMC7493977. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Biswas R, Rabbani R, Ahmed HS, Sarker MAS, Zafrin N, Rahman MM. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of urinary tract infection at a tertiary care hospital. Bangladesh Crit Care J [Internet]. 2014[cited 2022 Dec. 18];2(1):21-24. Available from: https://www.banglajol.info/index.php/BCCJ/article/view/19952. [crossref]
23.
Muzammil M, Adnan M, Sikandar SM, Waheed MU, Javed N, Ur Rehman MF. Study of culture and sensitivity patterns of urinary tract infections in patients presenting with urinary symptoms in a tertiary care hospital. Cureus. 2020;12(2):e7013. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.7013. PMID: 32211249; PMCID: PMC7081730.[crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Mishra PP, Prakash V, Singh K, Mog H, Agarwal S. Bacteriological profile of isolates from urine samples in patients of benign prostatic hyperplasia and or prostatitis showing lower urinary tract symptoms. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(10):DC16-DC18. Doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21973.8734. Epub 2016 Oct 1. PMID: 27891339; PMCID: PMC5121677. [Updated 2 Nanagiri A, Shabbir N. Lesch Nyhan Syndrome. 022 May 8]. In:
25.
StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan.
26.
Gulati S, Kher V, Arora P, Gupta S, Kale S. Urinary tract infection in nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996;15(3):237-40. Doi: 10.1097/00006454- 199603000-00012. PMID: 8852912. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Akhtar A, Ahmad Hassali MA, Zainal H, Ali I, Khan AH. A cross-sectional assessment of urinary tract infections among geriatric patients: Prevalence, medication regimen complexity, and factors associated with treatment outcomes. Front Public Health. 2021;9:657199. Doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.657199. PMID: 34733812; PMCID: PMC8558341. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Choi JB, Min SK. Complicated urinary tract infection in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jiac.2021.06.006. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S1341321X21001677).

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62386.17635

Date of Submission: Dec 20, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 11, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 08, 2023
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker:Dec 21, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 28, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 06, 2023 (20%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com