Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 226379

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : DC07 - DC10 Full Version

Incidence of Enteric Fever and their Resistant Pattern among School going Children in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh- A Matter of Concern


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61269.17629
Sanjay Singh Kaira, Geeta Gupta, Anuradha Makkar

1. PhD Scholar, Department of Microbiology, Santosh Medical College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Professor, Department of Microbiology, Santosh Medical College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Army College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Correspondence Address :
Mr. Sanjay Singh Kaira,
PhD Scholar, Department of Microbiology, Santosh Medical College and Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: sanjay.singh4055@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Children still experience enteric fever as a severe health problem in developing countries like India. It is an infectious disease that exclusively affects humans. In the developing world, it is one of the most prevalent bacterial causes of acute febrile sickness and is spread by the consumption of unhygienic food or water.

Aim: To identify the incidence and resistance pattern of Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi isolated from school age children.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among children with Salmonella enterica infections in the Department of Microbiology, Santosh Medical College and Hospital in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. During the study period, (July 2021 to June 2022) a total of 776 blood samples were obtained from school going children (03-17 years old) and immediately inoculated into Bact/Alert aerobic blood culture bottle and incubated at 37°C for upto five days. After receiving a positive result from Bact/Alert, gram staining was done. Standard microbiological procedures were followed such as different biochemical reactions, agglutination with different antisera for the identification of Salmonella serotypes. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was done using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Data was analysed by software version 16.0 of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).

Results: Total 88 Salmonella isolates were found, of which 21 (23.86%) were Salmonella Paratyphi A and 67 (76.14%) were Salmonella Typhi. Infection rate was more common in summer season. S. Typhi as well as S. Paratyphi A was found to be most resistance to nalidixic acid {58 (86.6%), 19 (90.5%)} followed by ciprofloxacin {42 (62.7%), 18 (85.7%)}. Ceftriaxone and azithromycin resistance pattern among S. Typhi isolates was 07 (10.4%) and 15 (22.4%), respectively and among S. Paratyphi A it was found to be 07 (33.33%) and 06 (28.6%), respectively.

Conclusion: This study found an increase in resistance to ceftriaxone and azithromycin, which are frequently thought of as the best medications for empiric therapy in children. Regular monitoring of the resistance pattern is necessary for doctors to select the appropriate empiric therapy due to the increasing resistance to the available class of antibiotics.

Keywords

Antibiotics sensitivity, Multidrug resistance, Salmonella paratyphi

An important global health issue is “enteric fever” (1). It is a severe infectious disease that exclusively affects humans. In the developing world, it is one of the most prevalent bacterial causes of acute febrile sickness and is spread by the consumption of tainted food or water (2),(3). This includes Salmonella Typhi causing typhoid fever and Salmonella Paratyphi causing paratyphoid fever. According to a recent estimate, there are more than 21 million cases of typhoid worldwide and more than 10 million deaths per year (4). Children in school between the ages of 5-17 year experience the highest incidence of it as shown by Dasari R et al., (17.09%) (5). Typhoid fever has the wide range of manifestation in the paediatrics age group, it can present as septicaemia in neonates and lower respiratory tract infections in older children. Consuming outside foods like junk food, ice cream, cut fruits, especially in the summer, is linked to a significant risk of typhoid in these kids (6). The greatest typhoid outbreak in recorded history took place in Sangli (India) between December 1975 to February 1976 (7). Typhoid continues to be a substantial health problem in the Indian subcontinent due to low living standards, overcrowding and subpar hygiene procedures, the prevalence has greatly decreased in the western countries as a result of improvements in sewage/water treatment and food handling (8). Since, enteric fever’s clinical symptoms are varied and challenging to distinguish from those of other common febrile disorders, it can be challenging to diagnose. Blood, feces, urine, rose spot fluid and bone marrow samples must be cultivated in order to isolate S. Typhi/Paratyphi for a precise diagnosis. Bacteria can be isolated from blood in more than 90% of cases within the first week of sickness. Morbidity and death can be considerably reduced by early diagnosis, the administration of the right antibiotics and other supportive treatments.

Multidrug Resistance Typhoid Fever (MDRTF), which is resistant to chloramphenicol, ampicillin and co-trimoxazole, was first identified in India in 1980 (9). The rate of resistance has increased everywhere in the world, but it is especially high in underdeveloped countries. In addition, certain strains have demonstrated resistance to third generation cephalosporins, the preferred medication and fluoroquinolones (10). Typhoid Conjugate Vaccines (TCVs) are being offered, and they are superior to polysaccharide vaccines in terms of effectiveness, displaying a persistently higher geometric mean titre of Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Vi antibodies 3-5 years after immunisation. The World Health Organisation (WHO) advises frequent use of TCVs in kids older than six months in typhoid endemic nations, focusing on those with a high burden or typhoid that is resistant to antibiotics (11).

This study’s objective was to determine the overall incidence of enteric fever with culture confirmation (typhoid and paratyphoid) and their pattern of antibiotic resistance, especially in reference to ceftriaxone and azithromycin, in children aged 3-17 years in a tertiary care hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Material and Methods

The cross-sectional study was conducted amongst the children (03-17 years of age) detected with Salmonella enterica infections in the Department of Microbiology, Santosh Medical College and Hospital in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India, from July 2021 to June 2022. Prior to conducting the study, Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) granted its approval for the project {Reference No: SU/2021/092(4)}. Written informed consent was taken from all participants of the study.

Inclusion criteria: Children (03-17 years of age) detected with Salmonella enterica infection in blood culture.

Exclusion criteria:

1. Children with non typhoidal Salmonellosis.
2. Repeat isolates.
3. Salmonella enterica isolated from samples other than blood.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was done by using the formula n=z2 pq/d2, where ‘p’ is the prevalence, q=1-p, ‘d’ is the precision of the estimate (0.05), Z=1.96 (95% confidence interval). The prevalence of culture positive Salmonella was taken to be 17.09% based on the study conducted by Dasari R et al., (5). So, according to calculation a total of 776 school going children were enrolled in the study.

Study Procedure

Sample collection and transport: Strict aseptic procedures were followed for collecting blood samples in Bact/Alert blood culture vials using vein puncture method. The volume of blood sample was 2-4 mL. Collected blood samples were immediately transferred to BACTEC blood culture bottles (HiMedia).

Processing and identification of the isolates: Bottles inoculated with blood specimen were incubated at 37°C for upto five days. After receiving a positive result from Bact/Alert, subcultures on blood agar and MacConkey agar were performed and incubated for 24-48 hours at 37°C. Using common bacteriological techniques and conventional microbiology techniques, organism identification and antibiotic sensitivity testing were conducted. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was done using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, with interpretation performed in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards (2021) (12). Pefloxacin was used a surrogate marker as per CLSI guidelines 2015 (13). Antibiograms from non repeat positive cultures were included for profiling isolates and determining their susceptibility to various antibiotics.

All the isolates were therefore confirmed by slide agglutination test using the high titre sera of Salmonella Typhi O, H, Salmonella Paratyphi AH and Salmonella Paratyphi BH procured from National Salmonella and Escherichia Centre, Kasauli (HP), India. The colony to be tested was emulsified in two drops of normal saline on a sterile clean glass slide to form a uniform smooth milky white suspension. One emulsion was used as a control to check for autoagglutinable. Agglutination was done first with polyvalent O antisera and polyvalent H antisera. The slide was rotated thoroughly for few seconds. A positive result is indicated by visible clumping, whereas if the milky white suspension remains unchanged, it indicates a negative result. Further agglutination step was done with monovalent O antisera (O:9 antisera for S. Typhi and O:2 antisera for S. Paratyphi A) and monovalent H antiserum (anti-d serum for S. Typhi and anti-a for S. Paratyphi A) depending upon the isolates suspected (14).

Statistical Analysis

Software version 16.0 of the SPSS was used to conduct the statistical analysis. Data were displayed as proportions and percentages.

Results

A total of 776 blood cultures from school going children were included in this study. Out of which 88 (11.3%) were culture positive 8for Salmonella. The male:female ratio was 2.38:1, with 62 (70.45%) males and 26 (29.55%) girls in total. Among the 88 Salmonella enterica species isolates, 67 (76.14%) were classified as Salmonella Typhi, and 21 (23.86%) as Salmonella Paratyphi A. The most common serotype isolated was Salmonella Typhi. Throughout, this research period, no other Salmonella serotypes were found. The study’s participants ranged in age from 3-17 years. Most number of enteric fever cases was found to be in 7-10 year age group 32 (36.4%) followed by 15-17 year age group 26 (29.5%) (Table/Fig 1).

The monthly distribution revealed that most of the positive cases appeared in May 2022 (n=20, 22.7%) followed by June 2022 (n=16, 18.2%) (Table/Fig 2).

Salmonella Typhi showed the following resistance pattern- ciprofloxacin 42 (62.7%), chloramphenicol 6 (8.9%), ampicillin 8 (11.9%), cotrimoxazole 2 (2.9%), whereas the 58 (86.6%) of the isolated S. Typhi strains were resistant to nalidixic acid and to pefloxacin (a surrogate marker, as per CLSI 2015) (Refer (Table/Fig 3)) (13).

In the current study, only 2 (2.9%) strains out of the 67 isolates of Salmonella Typhi were found to be MDR. A 10.4% of Salmonella Typhi isolates were resistance to ceftriaxone. Only one isolate of S. Typhi was imipenem resistance. The overall resistance pattern of Salmonella Paratyphi A is shown in (Table/Fig 3). The maximum resistance was found in ciprofloxacin 18 (85.7%) followed by pefloxacin and nalidixic acid 19 (90.5%). Total 7 (33.33%) isolates showed resistance to ceftriaxone.

Discussion

One of the primary causes of illness and mortality worldwide is enteric fever (15). It is the most prevalent public health issue in developing nations, including India, and is mostly brought on by rapid population expansion, a lack of adequate water supply, poor sanitation, overcrowding, inappropriate waste disposal and unsanitary practices. With the appearance of Nalidixic Acid Resistant Salmonella Typhi (NARST), the issue grew worse, making ciprofloxacin a dubious treatment option. However, recent investigations have indicated that Salmonella has returned in response to first-line medications. With this fluctuating pattern of antibiograms, it is essential to continuously track the drug resistance pattern and comprehend the underlying mechanism to prevent treatment failure (16). The incidence of enteric fever documented from various studies of India is shown in (Table/Fig 4) (5),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21).

The incidence rate of Salmonella enterica in present study was 11.3% which was higher to 2.38% as reported by Prajapati B et al., 7.8 % by Budhathoki S et al., and 6.67% by Dudeja N et al., (18),(20),(21) . However, Dasari R et al., (17.1%) Sinha A et al., (11.7%) and Ghosh T et al., (20.92%) obtained the higher incidence rate (5),(17),(19). Over the course of the study’s 12 month timeframe, 88 different Salmonella isolates were isolated. The male to female ratio was 2.38:1, which is almost identical to research done by Saraswat S et al., (2.8:1) and Tewari R et al., (2.57:1) (16),(22). Gender preference may be linked to patriarchy, in which males are more likely to be valued than girls and are hence more likely to be taken to the hospital. This claim, as well as the likelihood that boys and girls use the restroom differently, behave differently, or are exposed to the outdoors, have not yet been confirmed (23).

This study also revealed that incidence was higher in the summer, particularly during the rainy season (54.5%), which was consistent with the findings of Prajapati B et al., (47.7%) (18). This occurs because the sewage system overflowed during the rainy season, which may contaminate the environment and drinking water with fecal matter, leading to infection. The majority of the isolates were detected in children aged 7 to 10-year-old, which was almost identical to the findings of study by Judio MP et al., (59.1%) and Saleem S et al., (52.2%), which revealed that those aged 5 to 10-year-old were most commonly affected (23),(24). This age group was impacted, maybe as a result of eating unhygienic street food, using school water, or not knowing how to properly wash their hands.

Salmonella Typhi was most sensitive to imipenem (98.5%) followed by cotrimoxazole (97%), ceftazidime (92.5%) and ceftriaxone (89.5%). A study conducted by Prajapati B et al., which showed 93.5% isolates were sensitive to cotrimoxazole, 98.5% isolates sensitive to ceftriaxone which was higher than present study (18). In case of S. Paratyphi A, resistance to ceftriaxone was higher (33.33%) as compared with S. Typhi. Azithromycin can be a drug of choice. Tiwari R et al., and Gautam V et al., reported 90.8% and 100% sensitivity to azithromycin, respectively (22),(25). Azithromycin sensitivity in this investigation ranged between 77.6% and 71.4% for S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A, respectively. Although, fluoroquinolones have been restricted in children due to potential cartilage damage, is still the drug of choice for treating enteric fever and widely used due to their moderate cost, oral intake benefit and tolerance. This led to declines in their sensitivity and poor clinical efficacy, which compelled doctors to employ third generation cephalosporins (21). A 86.6% of the isolates of S. Typhi and 90.5% of the isolates of S. Paratyphi A, respectively, were nalidixic acid resistance, which was used as a surrogate marker for predicting low level ciprofloxacin resistance among Salmonella species. This finding was somewhat similar to a study by William A et al., which showed 98.4% S. Typhi isolates and 99.1% S. Paratyphi A isolates were nalidixic acid resistance (15).

Different geographic regions or population genetic variability may be the cause of the variance in the research of antibiotic susceptibility [15,26]. The persistence of clinical symptoms or a delayed response to treatment may be linked to the resistant strains of ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid and pefloxacin. In the event, that a ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) test cannot be performed pefloxacin disc diffusion may be used as a surrogate test (15). Although, the precise mechanism of fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella isolates is not entirely understood, numerous findings indicate that ciprofloxacin resistance is at a high level. According to some research, a single mutation in the gyr A gene is enough to cause nalidixic acid resistance and reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (15). Ceftriaxone was suggested by the Indian Academy of Paediatrics as the first-line of treatment for complex typhoid fever. For S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A, respectively, around 10.4% and 33.33% of the population showed resistance in this study which was higher than the study conducted by, Jha G et al., (10%) Saraswat S et al., (0%), Prajapati B et al., (1.1%, 2.6%) (7),(16),(18). Concerns are raised about their use without proper antibiotics susceptibility testing. It is obvious that it is time to review our treatment plans in view of the emergence of strains that are resistant to ceftriaxone and azithromycin. Patients who have such strains of infection are more likely to develop complications and require antibiotic therapy with more modern drugs.

Limitation(s)

This study was an entirely on culture positive enteric fever cases where consideration of the actual therapeutic intervention and clinical outcome of the patients were not taken into account. The samples were obtained from a tertiary care hospital only, not from peripheral health centres. Therefore, the results may not be applicable to other geographical areas. Also, molecular characterisation of ceftriaxone resistant strains could not be determined due to limited resources.

Conclusion

In developing nations, enteric fever is still a serious public health issue that primarily affects school aged children. Good personal hygiene practises, appropriate sanitation and knowledge of the disease and its transmission should all be observed. The drinking water supply in schools, especially in government institutions, should be checked on a regular basis. Students need to understand the advantages of proper hand washing. Parents should encourage their kids not to eat any junk food outside. Additionally, typhoid vaccination and prudent antibiotic administration based on the culture sensitivity pattern will aid in lowering the disease’s impact.

References

1.
Khan S, Kurup P, Vinod V, Biswas R, Pillai G, Kumar A. Reconsidering azithromycin disc diffusion interpretive criteria for Salmonellae in view of azithromycin MIC creep among typhoidal and nontyphoidal Salmonella. J Lab Physicians. 2019;11:39-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Kumar SJ. A descriptive study to assess the knowledge regarding enteric fever in children among mothers in a selected hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab. Asian J of Nursing Education and Research. 2020;10(6):413-18. [crossref]
3.
Khadka S, Shrestha B, Pokhrel A, Khadka S, Joshi R, Banjara M. Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Typhi isolated from a referral hospital of Kathmandu, Nepal. SAGE. 2021;14:01-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Ashoka M, Somi P, Snigdharani C, Ambareesh P, Rekha D. Emerging enteric fever due to switching biotype of Salmonella (paratyphi A) in Eastern Odisha. Indian J Pathol Microbial. 2016;59:327-29. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Dasari R, Reddy KS, Kuruvada SS, Nimmagadda A, Tabussum T, Srikrishna S. Enteric fever among febrile children aged 1 to 18 years: Prevalence, diagnosis performance of the Typhoid dot IgM and antibiotic multi drug resistance. IP Int J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2021;7(1):41-45. [crossref]
6.
Devaranavadagi RA, Srinivasa S. A study on clinical profile of typhoid fever in children. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2017;4(3):1067-73. [crossref]
7.
Nadkarni MG, Joshi BN. An outbreak of enteric fever in village Kanthauli of Sangli district. Indian J Med Sci. 1967;21:597-602.
8.
Jha G, Kumar A, Singh BK, Kejriwal M. Clinical & laboratory profile of typhoid fever in children with special emphasis on drug resistance. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2019;18(6):01-07.
9.
Swaroopaani NB, Wadekar MD. Antibiotics sensitivity pattern of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi with special reference to Nalidixic acid. IJMR. 2018;5(2):249-51. [crossref]
10.
Adhikari D, Acharya D, Shrestha P, Amatya R. Ciprofloxacin susceptibility of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and Paratyphi A from blood samples of suspected enteric fever patients. Int J Infect Micobiol. 2012;1(1):09-13. [crossref]
11.
Sinha B, Rongsen-Chandola T, Goyal N, Arya A, Kumar CM, Chakravarty A. Incidence of enteric fever in a pediatric cohort in north India: Comparison with estimates from 20 years earlier. JID. 2021;224(5):558-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Performance standards for Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 32 nd edition informational supplement. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2021. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (CLSI Document M100).
13.
Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 25 th informational supplement. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2015. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (CLSI Document M100-25).
14.
Sastry AS, Bhat S. Essential of Medical Microbiology. 2 nd edition. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers medical publishers; 2019:336.
15.
William A, Oberoi A, Dewan E. Trends of Salmonella serotypes and antibiotics susceptibility pattern of Typhoidal Salmonella in a tertiary care hospital of north India. Jermm. 2017;3(2):15-17.
16.
Saraswat S, Kumar M, Gupta R. Pediatric nature of enteric fever with emerging antibiograms: A cross-sectional study. Int J Pediatr Res. 2018;4(2):039. Doi: org/10.23937/2469-5769/1510039. [crossref]
17.
Sinha A, Sazawal S, Kumar R, Sood S, Reddaiah VP, Singh B. Typhoid fever in children aged less than 5 years. The Lancet. 1999;354(9180):734-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Prajapati B, Rai GK, Rai SK, Upreti HC, Thapa M, Singh G, et al. Prevalence of Salmonella typhi and paratyphi infection in childen: A hospital based study. Nepal Med Coll J. 2008;10(4):238-41.
19.
Ghosh T, Biswas S, Santra R, Satpathi PS. Clinico-epidemiological profile and patterns of antibiotic sensitivity of enteric fever cases among paediatric patients in the adjacent areas of midnapore- A hospital-based study. New Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2018;7(3):137-44.
20.
Budhathoki S, Rimal S, Shrestha S, Lama L, Sanjel S, Amgain K. Clinical profile of enteric fever in children of a tertiary care centre in Kathmandu, Nepal. Journal of Karnali Academy of Health Sciences. 2020;3(2):122-27. [crossref]
21.
Dudeja N, Sinha B, Goyal N, Arya A, Revi A, Dutta A, et al. Association of water, sanitation, hygiene and food practices with enteric fever in a paediatric cohort in North India. BMJ Paediatrics Open. 2022;6:e001352. Doi: 10.1136/ bmjpo- 2021-001352. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Tewari R, Jamal S, Dudeja M. Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica serovars in Southern India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2015;2(3):254-58. [crossref]
23.
Judio MP, Karyanti M, Waslia L, Subekti D, Supriyatno B, Baird K. Antimicrobial Susceptibility among circulating Salmonella typhi serotypes in children in Jakarta, Indonesia. J Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;7(1):29-35. [crossref]
24.
Saleem S, Parkash A, Jalil M, Mubashir F. Sensitivity pattern of Salmonella typhi from blood culture in paediatric population. Liaquat National Journal of Primary Care. 2021;3(2):77-81.
25.
Gautam V, Gupta N, Chaudhary U, Arora DR. Sensitivity pattern of Salmonella serotypes in Northern India. Brazilian J Infect Dis. 2002;6:281-87. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Chand HJ, Rijal KR, Neupane B, Sharma VK, Jha B. Re-emergence of susceptibility to conventional first line drugs in Salmonella isolates from enteric fever patients in Nepal. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014;8(11):1483-87.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61269.17629

Date of Submission: Nov 05, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 13, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 05, 2023
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 09, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 10, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jan 02, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com