Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 148495

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : CC13 - CC18 Full Version

Correlation of Health-related Quality of Life and Factors Affecting among Different Age Groups in Transfusion-dependent Thalassaemia Patients- A Cross-sectional Study


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59166.17642
Hitali Ramesh Mali, Yashoda Ravindra Kattimani, Bageshree Seth, Satish D Pathak

1. PhD Scholar, Department of Physiology, MGM Medical College, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, MGM Medical College, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Paediatric, MGM Medical College, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 4. Assistant Director Research, Associate Professor, Kaivalyadhama Yoga Institute, Lonavala, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Mrs. Hitali Ramesh Mali,
B2-902, Runwal Estate, Dhokali, Ghodbunder Road, Thane-400607, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: hitalimali34@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) aims to measure a person’s views on the impact of their disease. Children suffering from thalassaemia require frequent blood transfusions throughout their lives because of impaired Haemoglobin (Hb). This may necessitate them to stay in the hospital for a longer transfusion day. School, physical activities, competencies, and family stability are all compromised in some way. Assessing HRQoL in individuals with thalassaemia and identifying variables that contribute to low quality of life is crucial.

Aim: To correlate HRQoL and factors affecting among different age groups in transfusion-dependent thalassaemia patients.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at MGM College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India from October 2020 to August 2021, 70 thalassaemia patients aged 8-25 years registered for regular blood transfusions were included in the study and divided into three age groups: Group-I (8-12 years) n=25, II (13-17 years) n=24, and III (18-25 years) n=21. The study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee. Paediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL™) 4.0 generic core scale questionnaire was used to assess patients’ HRQoL. This questionnaire has two parallel reports: child self-reports and parent proxy reports and assess HRQoL across four dimensions: physical, emotional, school, and social functioning. Anthropometric and demographic parameters considered are height, weight and age. Pretransfusion Hb and ferritin levels, Cardiac iron overload, age of first transfusion, frequency of transfusion, annual blood requirement were collected and correlated with HRQoL scores. One-way ANOVA, unpaired student’s t-test and Pearson’s correlation were applied for statistical analysis and p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Comparison of total mean score of child’s self-report between three age groups showed significant difference (p=0.001). In Group-I, the lowest score was for physical functioning (41.9±18) and significantly correlated with pretransfusion Hb, annual blood requirement, and age of first transfusion. In Group-II, the lowest score was for school functioning (54±18) and significantly correlated with pretransfusion Hb, annual blood requirement, cardiac iron loading, and age of first transfusion. In Group-III, the lowest score was for school functioning (50.9±12) and significantly correlated with pretransfusion Hb, ferritin level, age of first transfusion, annual blood requirement, and frequency of transfusion.

Conclusion: The HRQoL scores of thalassaemia patients was low in parent’s report as compared to children’s report in all four dimensions in all three groups. The predominant factors affecting are pretransfusion Hb level, annual blood requirement, and age of the first transfusion.

Keywords

Annual blood requirement, Cardiac iron overloading, Pretransfusion haemoglobin

Thalassaemia is an autoimmune disease that causes red blood cell destruction due to impaired Hb production (1). Children suffering from thalassaemia require frequent blood transfusions throughout their lives because of impaired Hb. This may necessitate them to stay in the hospital for a longer transfusion day (2). From the identification of the first incidence of thalassaemia to date, diagnostic and treatment approaches for this life-threatening condition have altered considerably over time. However, despite how basic it appears, any intervention has the potential to enhance HRQoL in thalassaemia (3).

School, physical activities, competencies, and family stability are all compromised in some way. The consequences of which usually lead to psychological, emotional, and societal devastation (4). Health difficulties, blood transfusions, and other illnesses can lead to poor physical and psychological health, social dysfunction, and absence from school or failure to continue studying (3). Several factors impact thalassaemic children’s HRQoL.

HRQoL is a wide term that tries to determine a person’s perceived impact of their disease and/or therapy on their health and wellbeing (5),(6). “Dr. James Varni developed the PedsQL 4.0 generic core scale to assess the fundamental core functioning for paediatric HRQoL across four domains: physical, emotional, school and social functioning” (7),(8),(9),(10). The PedsQL 4.0 questionnaire has widespread recognition as a technique in healthy and unhealthy paediatric populations due to its accuracy, applicability, and accessibility (7),(8),(9),(10),(11).

While various HRQoL studies have been successfully done to enhance healthcare in developed countries, similar research and their applicability are lacking in developing countries [4,11]. In recent years, even though clinical management has tremendously improved in developing countries, but little effort has been made to promote patient’s quality of life (12). Hence, Assessing HRQoL in individuals with thalassaemia and identifying factors that contribute to poor quality of life is crucial (13). Therefore, this study was undertaken to assess HRQoL in thalassaemia patients and correlate it with the factors related to the disease. The hypothesis of this study is that factors like pretransfusion Hb, ferritin level, cardiac iron overloading, age of first transfusion and annual blood requirement may contribute to low HRQoL scores in thalassaemia patients.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at MGM Medical College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India from October 2020 to August 2021. The MGM College Ethics Committee, Navi Mumbai granted approval to the study. The ethical clearance number-Ref.MGMIHS/RES./02/2020-2021/68. The aim of the study was explained to all participants and parents and written informed consent of parents and the child’s assent were obtained from all of them.

Seventy transfusion-dependent thalassaemia children, adolescents, and young adults aged between 8 to 25 years were included in the study. The convenient sampling method was used to include all the patients registered for blood transfusion in MGM hospital who fulfilled the inclusion criteria during the study period.

Inclusion criteria: Thalassaemia patients between 8-25 years of age who were registered for blood transfusion and were willing to volunteer in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Thalassaemia patients who denied taking part in the study, patients below 8 years and above 25 years and patients with any complications like hypersplenism, cardiac failure, liver failure, etc., were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

The Paediatric QoL InventoryTM (PedsQLTM) 4.0 Generic Core Scale Questionnaire was used to assess HRQoL (7),(8),(9),(10).

The participants were divided into three different age groups: I (8-12 years) n=25; II (13-17 years) n=24; and III (18-25 years) n=21. Groups were made on the base of PedsQLTM 4.0 generic core scale. This Questionnaire is different for different age groups.

The appropriate questionnaire was administered for different age groups.

Along with the questionnaire other parameters measured are as follows:

1. Age (years), height (cm), and weight (kg) was among the anthropometric measurements taken. An anthropometric digital weighing scale (MI-120T model, Meditrin instruments, India), was used to record weight. Height was measured using wall mounted height measuring scale. Body Mass Index (BMI) in kg/m2 was calculated using the formula- weight (kg)/height (m2) (14).
2. Haematological parameters: pretransfusion Hb (gm/dL), Ferritin level (ng/mL), and cardiac iron overload (using Cardiac T2* MRI in ms) were investigated.
3. Age of the first transfusion (months), Frequency of transfusion (no./year), and Annual blood requirement (cc/kg/year), were collected from the patient’s clinical record.

Questionnaire assessment: Before using the questionnaire, a user agreement was completed with the MAPI Research Institute which has developed the PedsQLTM questionnaire. This questionnaire has two parallel reports: child self-reports and parent proxy reports. The study included child self-report and parent proxy-report of ages 8-12, 13-17, and 18-25 years. PedsQL items inquire about the severity of conditions patients face over one month. For each item, replies are given on a five-point Likert scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). The 23 elements include eight items on physical functioning and five items each on emotional functioning, social functioning, and school functioning, with the overall score. Each scale has been assessed as a number ranging from 100 to 0, with the greater the score, the higher the QoL. The PedsQL questionnaire was to be completed individually by parents and children aged 8 and above for HRQoL assessment (7),(8),(9),(10).

Statistical Analysis

Microsoft excel and SPSS software version 16.0 were used to analyse the data. HRQoL scores, for each functioning as well as total scores, for parents as well as child’s reports for all three age groups were represented by mean and standard deviation. One-way ANOVA and unpaired student’s t-test were applied to study the difference in score. Pearson’s correlation was applied to examine the relation between HRQoL and each factor affecting the quality of life. Factors with significant correlation were plotted in a scattered chart. The significance level was considered for the p-value as p<0.05.

Results

(Table/Fig 1) shows the average age, weight, height, and BMI of patients in different age groups. For Group-I: average age (years) was 9.3±1.2, weight (Kg) was 21±3.8, height (cm) was 125±6.3, BMI (kg/m2) was 13.8±1.9. For Group-II: average age (years) was 14.7±1.3, weight (Kg) was 33±6.3, height (cm) was 150±8.5, BMI (kg/m2) was 14.5±1.9. For Group-III: Average age (years) was 21.3±2.5, weight (Kg) was 40.1±10, height (cm) was 149±10.6, BMI (kg/m2) was 17.8±4.4. As per BMI, all patients fall in the underweight category for all age groups.

(Table/Fig 2) shows clinical and haematological characteristics of patients which affects their quality of life. Pretransfusion Hb level (gm/dL) was found to be low in all age groups (Group-I was 6.9±1.2, Group-II was 7±1.4 and Group-III was 6.7±1.2). Ferritin level (ng/mL)
was high in all age groups (Group-I was 2604±1000, Group-II was 2587±13 and Group-III was 2197±1204). Not much cardiac iron loading was found through cardiac T2* MRI (ms) (Group-I was 34.8±18, Group-II was 23.8±21 and Group-III was 32.5±21). Mean age of 1st transfusion (months) for Group-I was 10.8±13, Group-II was 18±13 and Group-III was 26.2±30. Mean annual blood required (cc/kg/year) by Group-I was 261±59, Group-II was 255±77 and Group-III was 243±65. Frequency of transfusion per year for Group-I was 14±1.3, Group-II was 14±0.9 and Group-III was 13.7±1.6.

(Table/Fig 3) shows Comparison of HRQoL of the total mean score of child’s self-report between three age groups. Group-I (43.9±14.5) has a significantly lower quality of life than the other two groups (II: 60±10.9 and III: 55.7±14.2).

(Table/Fig 4) shows comparison of total mean score of a child’s report with a parent’s report between three groups with a significant difference in Group-II (p-0.001) and Group-III (p-0.05) but a non significant difference in Group-I (p-0.9).

(Table/Fig 5) shows scoring of individual dimensions of physical, emotional, social, and school functioning scores between three groups. In Group-I, the lowest score was shown for physical functioning in both child (41.9±18) as well as parent report (38±7.9). In Group-II, in the child’s report, school functioning had the lowest score (54±18), while social functioning received the lowest score (41.3±8) in the parent’s report. In Group-III, both child (50.9±12), as well as parent reports (50.9±12), had the lowest scores for school functioning. Comparison of each domains of child’s report between groups shows significant difference (p-values for physical-0.003, emotional-0.05, social-0.001 and school-0.1) and the lowest score was found to be in Group-I in all domains. For parent’s report, the lowest score was found for physical (p-0.007) and school (p-value-0.3) domain in Group-I and for emotional (p- 0.4) and social (p-0.001) domain in Group-II.

(Table/Fig 6) shows the correlation of HRQoL of the total mean score of child self-report and parameters which affect the quality of life. In Group-I, there was a weak positive correlation with Cardiac T2* MRI (iron loading) and a strong positive correlation with the pretransfusion Hb and age of the first transfusion. Ferritin showed moderate negative, annual blood requirement showed strong negative, and frequency of transfusion showed a weak negative imagingcorrelation. In Group-II, pretransfusion Hb, Cardiac T2* MRI (iron loading), and age of the first transfusion show a strong positive correlation. Annual blood requirement and frequency of transfusion showed a strong negative correlation and Ferritin moderate negative correlation. In Group-III, pretransfusion Hb, and age of the first transfusion show a strong positive correlation and Cardiac T2* MRI (iron loading) showed a moderate positive correlation. Annual blood requirement, Ferritin and frequency of transfusion showed a strong negative correlation.

(Table/Fig 7) shows significant positive correlation between HRQoL and a) Age of the first transfusion (r=0.67, p=0.002); b) Pretransfusion Hb (r=0.43, p=0.03) and negative correlation with; c) Annual blood requirement (r=-0.40, p=0.04) in Group-I.

(Table/Fig 8) shows significant positive correlation between HRQoL; and a) age of the first transfusion (r=0.67, p=0.005), c) Pretransfusion Hb (r=0.52, p=0.04); and d) Cardiac iron loading (r=0.50, p=0.05) and negative correlation with; b) Annual blood requirement (r=-0.50, p=0.05), in Group-II.

(Table/Fig 9) shows significant positive correlation between HRQoL; and a) Age of the first transfusion (r=0.77, p=0.001); and d) Pretransfusion Hb (r=0.87, p=0.001) and negative correlation with b) Annual blood requirement (r=-0.77 p=0.001); c) Frequency of transfusion (r=-0.80 p=0.006); and e) Ferritin level (r=-0.72, p=0.007) in Group-III.

Discussion

Thalassaemia’s outcome has changed drastically over time, from a life-threatening disease to a chronic condition with impairment (15). Measuring HRQoL in patients to get a perspective of how they feel about their illness and how it affects their life. Implementing strategic choices targeted not only at extending the life and even at improving the quality of life of these people is critical (11). Therefore, HRQoL in transfusion-dependent thalassaemia patients was assessed in this study. Further, investigation was done for individual factors that may affect HRQoL of patients. Because the study focused on the patient’s perspective, only HRQoL scores from children’s self-reports were correlated with different factors. The parent’s report was collected and compared to the child’s report to see the parent’s perspective on their child’s disease (16).

Paediatric QoL inventory version 4.0 (PedsQL 4.0) Generic core scales was used to analyse HRQoL in this study, as PedsQL 4.0 questionnaire proved simple to understand and was previously widely utilised in patients with thalassaemia (16),(17). Overall scores of HRQoL were significantly lower in thalassaemia patients according to parent’s reports as compared children’s report and finding are similar to those of research conducted by Mikael NA and Al-Allawi NA; Mettananda S et al., Thavorncharoensap M et al., Hakeem GLA et al., Baghianimoghadam MH et al., Ismail A et al., which showed low scores in HRQoL in thalassaemia patients compared to normal counterparts (11),(13),(16),(17),(18),(19). This is unsurprising given the disease’s chronic nature, but it is disconcerting because HRQoL scores are still much worse despite major advances in medical care. This shows that advancements in medical care may not significantly impact these patients’ quality of life (13). Few studies conducted by Boonchooduang N et al., Ismail M et al., Sultana R et al., show contradictory findings with higher HRQoL (20),(21),(22). Furthermore, some researchers like Caocci G et al., Varni JW et al., Boonchooduang N et al., Surapolchai P et al., have noted that parent scores were lower than their children’s scores (4),(10),(20),(23). A similar result was found in this study too. This could be related to the parents’ increased concern, dissatisfaction, and protective view of their child’s well-being, as well as their propensity to overprotect their chronically unwell child (23).

In this study, the child’s HRQoL in different age groups showed that in Group-I physical score was the lowest and in Groups II and III the lowest score was for school functioning. Studies by Ismail A et al., Anionwu E and Atkin K, Musallam K et al., Saeed N, Shafie AA et al., had similar findings with lowest score in physical and school domains (19),(24),(25),(26),(27). This might be linked to the fact that frequently missing school for routine check-ups, irregular blood transfusions due to unavailability of matched blood as well as tiredness during strenuous exercise due to chronic anaemia had a considerable negative impact on the HRQoL. There is little data on whether patients score low in this element are as a result of anaemia, which contributes to poor academic ability, or frequent hospital visits, which causes absences from school (27). When child’s report of HRQoL was compared to parent’s reports, in Group-I and Group-III the report was similar to the child’s report but in Group-II social functioning showed the lowest score. As paediatric patients are not aware of their illness but as they grow they had low self-esteem and showed negative thoughts about their life, as well as unhappiness, anger, and hurt in response to their chronic disease which significantly decreases psychosocial well-being (28). and need psychosocial support as suggested by Aydinok Y et al., and Goldbeck L et al., (29),(30).

Patients with thalassaemia in all three age groups have lower pretransfusion Hb levels, despite regular blood transfusion. pretransfusion Hb levels must be checked regularly to maintain a range between 9-10.5 g/dL (31),(32). This study findings suggest that greater the pretransfusion Hb levels better the HRQoL ratings, also previously reported by Thavorncharoensap M et al., Surapolchai P et al., Elalfy MS et al., (16),(23),(33). The studies by Mevada ST et al., and Jafari-Shakib A et al., showed contrary results with better Hb level (34),(35). Low pretransfusion Hb levels could be linked to the fact that minimal Hb levels are linked to a variety of symptoms, including lethargy, overall weakness, and reduced mental alertness, all of which can contribute to a patient’s HRQoL being compromised across several domains (16).

There was a negative association between HRQoL scores and serum ferritin levels. Because the association was weak and non significant, no clinical implications in Group-I and Group-II was found, but in Group-III the correlation was significant. Cardiac T2* MRI has a weak positive correlation with HRQoL. More the Cardiac T2* MRI lesser the iron loading. The studies conducted by Borgna-Pignatti C et al., Dubey AP et al., Olivieri NF et al., Telfer PT et al., shows that long-term iron overload and high serum ferritin levels can cause significant morbidity and mortality (31),(32),(36),(37). This may be because long-term iron overloading is damaging; short-term iron overloading, as indicated by a raised serum ferritin level, did not invent obvious signs or difficulties, and thus did not affect their HRQoL (16). So, it may be considered as the age advances the complications go on increasing.

In this study, there is a significant correlation with age of first transfusion and annual blood requirement in all three age groups, the possible explanation for the significant correlation of the amount of blood required may be related to low pretransfusion Hb levels. But on the other hand, there have been non significant relation with the frequency of transfusion per year in Group-I and Group-II, as the questionnaire ask questions concerned with well-being about a previous month which might not be considered for a whole year, also suggested by Thavorncharoensap M et al., (16). In contrast, Group-III showed a significant correlation, advancing in age could be the possibility as discussed above.

Age was an important factor of HRQoL in thalassaemia patients. Although shifting from child to adult brings with it a whole slew of new problems, like a much more active lifestyle, determining a successful job path, and marriage, it also brings up health issues (25). Despite all these, adolescent patients showed much greater HRQoL than comparable younger individuals, according to this study. This conclusion seemed comparable with previous studies by Thavorncharoensap M et al., Ismail A et al., Mikelli A et al., Motti F et al., which found that older age group children with thalassaemia had lower levels of depression, indicating better coping and adaptation (16),(19),(38),(39), and poor HRQoL was linked to commencing transfusion at a younger age as seen in the study by Hakeem GLA et al., (17). This finding was contrast with the finding of Mikael NA and Al-Allawi NA and Shafie AA et al., which shows HRQoL worsens as patients grow older (11),(27). Prolonged exposure to recurrent transfusion has a significant impact on thalassaemia patients’ fitness and physical performance (17).

Changes in medical interventions for thalassaemic patients to make them more patient-centered, accessible, thorough, as well as complete might shorten hospitalisation duration and enhance treatment results, particularly patient’s HRQoL. Counselling programs should be planned to discuss their illness, lifestyle, and other issues which may help in psychosocial well-being (27).

As blood transfusions are the only preferable way to fight this illness, effective measures for the availability of blood transfusions should be done. Also, maintaining pretransfusion Hb level above 9 g/dL is necessary (31),(32). An iron chelate regimen that minimises the long-term implications of iron overloading is crucial even when there was a non significant association between serum ferritin and HRQoL (40),(41),(42), that might improve the patient’s HRQoL.

Limitation(s)

The limitation of this study was, that the healthy counterparts were not included in the study so there was no HRQoL score of healthy people to compare and the comparison was based on the literature available. Another limitation is that the results may be limited in the potential to be extended to patients in other geographical locations as the patients were from the same location.

Conclusion

The HRQoL scores of thalassaemia patients were low in parent’s report as compared to children’s report in all four dimensions in all three groups. Age is an important indicator of HRQoL in thalassaemia patients. This study found greater HRQol scores in adolescents then younger individuals. All correlating factors affects quality of life to some extent but predominant factors in all three age groups affecting HRQoL were pretransfusion Hb level, annual blood requirement, and age of first transfusion.

References

1.
8th edition. New Delhi: Elsevier India Pvt., Ltd; 2011.923-4p.
2.
Kavitha K, Padmaja A. Health related quality of life and its associated factors among thalassaemic children: A review. International Journal of Health Sciences & Research. 2019;9(5):386-90.
3.
Khani H, Majdi MR, Marzabadi EA, Montazeri A, Ghorbani A, Ramezani M. Quality of life in Iranian beta-thalassaemia major patients of Southern coastwise of the Caspian Sea. Behavioral Sciences. 2009;2:325-32.
4.
Caocci G, Efficace F, Ciotti F, Roncarolo MG, Vacca A, Piras E, et al. Health related quality of life in Middle Eastern children with beta-thalassaemia. BMC Blood Disord. 2012;12:6. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Marcel WM. Definitions of quality of life: What has happened and how to move on. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014;20(3):167-80. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Petersson C, Huus K, Akesson K, Enskar K. Children’s experience about structured assessment of health-related quality of life during a patient encounter. Child Care Health Dev. 2016;42(3):424-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: Reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001;39(8):800-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Varni JW, Seid M, Knight TS, Uzark K, Szer IS. The PedsQL 4.0 generic core scales: Sensitivity, responsiveness, and impact on clinical decision making. J Behav Med. 2002;25(2):175-93. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Seid M. The PedsQL 4.0 as a school population measure: Feasibility, reliability, and validity. Qual Life Res. 2006;15(2):203-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM. How young can children reliably and validly self-report their health-related quality of life? An analysis of 8,591 children across age subgroups with the PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:1. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Mikael NA, Al-Allawi NA. Factors affecting quality of life in children and adolescents with thalassaemia in Iraqi Kurdistan. Saudi Med J. 2018;39(8):799-807. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Taher AT, Cappellini MD. How I manage medical complications of beta-thalassaemia in adults. Blood. 2018;132(17):1781-91. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Mettananda S, Pathiraja H, Peiris R, Bandara D, De Silva U, Mettananda C. Health related quality of life among children with transfusion dependent β-thalassaemia major and haemoglobin E β-thalassaemia in Sri Lanka: A case control study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1):137. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Choo V. WHO reassesses appropriate body-mass index for Asian population. The Lancet. 2002;360(9382):235. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Cappellini MD, Porter JB, Viprakasit V, Taher AT. A paradigm shift on beta-thalassaemia treatment: How will we manage this old disease with new therapies? Blood Rev. 2018;32(4):300-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Thavorncharoensap M, Torcharus K, Nuchprayoon I, Riewpaiboon A, Indaratna K, Ubol B. Factors affecting health-related quality of life in Thai children with thalassaemia. BMC Blood Disord. 2010;10:1. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Hakeem GLA, Mousa SO, Moustafa AN, Mahgoob MH, Hassan EE. Health-related quality of life in pediatric and adolescent patients with transfusion-dependent ß-thalassaemia in upper Egypt (single center study). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):59. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Baghianimoghadam MH, Sharifirad G, Rahaei Z, Baghianimoghadam B, Heshmati H. Health-related quality of life in children with thalassaemia assessed on the basis of SF-20 questionnaire in Yazd, Iran: A case–control study. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2011;19(3):165-69. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Ismail A, Campbell MJ, Ibrahim HM, Jones GL. Health related quality of life in Malaysian children with thalassaemia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:39. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Boonchooduang N, Louthrenoo O, Choeyprasert W, Charoenkwan P. Health-related quality of life in adolescents with thalassaemia. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2015;32(5):341-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Ismail M, Chun CY, Shahar S, Manaf ZA. Quality of life among thalassaemia children, adolescent and their caregivers. Sains Malaysiana. 2013;42(3):373-80.
22.
Sultana R, Humayun S, Noor T, Humayun S, Zafar U. Impact of thalassaemia on quality of Life. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pak. 2016;6(4):156-60.
23.
Surapolchai P, Satayasai W, Sinlapamongkolkul P, Udomsubpayakul U. Biopsychosocial predictors of health related quality of life in children with thalassaemia in Thammasat University Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010;93(Suppl 7):S65-S75.
24.
Anionwu E, Atkin K. The politics of sickle cell and thalassaemia. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2001. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Politics-of-Sickle-Cell-and-Thalassaemia-Anionwu-Atkin/61b9c298ede9a17d9e64004f5c5a84e23d082bdf-.
25.
Musallam K, Cappellini MD, Taher A. Challenges associated with prolonged survival of patients with thalassaemia: Transitioning from childhood to adulthood. Pediatrics. 2008;121(5):e1426-29. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Saeed N. My life. United Kingdom Thalassaemia Society Matters. 2004;99:10.
27.
Shafie AA, Chhabra IK, Wong JHY, Mohammed NS, Ibrahim HM, Alias H. Health-related quality of life among children with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia: A cross-sectional study in Malaysia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):141. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
El Dakhakhny AM, Hesham MA, Mohamed SE, Mohammad FN. Quality of life of school age thalassaemic children at Zagazig city. J Am Sci. 2011;7(1):186-97.
29.
Aydinok Y, Erermis S, Bukusoglu N, Yilmaz D, Solak U. Psychosocial implications of thalassaemia major. Paediatr Int. 2005;47(1):84-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Goldbeck L, Baving A, Kohne E. Psychosocial aspects of beta thalassaemia: Distress, coping and adherence. Klin Padiatr. 2000 Sep;212(5):254-59. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Borgna-Pignatti C, Rugolotto S, De Stefano P, Zhao H, Cappellini MD, Del Vecchio GC, et al. Survival and complications in patients with thalassaemia major treated with transfusion and deferoxamine. Haematologica. 2004;89(10):1187-93.
32.
Dubey AP, Parakh A, Dublish S. Current trends in the management of beta-thalassaemia. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75(7):739-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Elalfy MS, Farid MN, Labib J, RezkAllah HK. Quality of life of Egyptian β-thalassaemia major children and adolescents. Egyptian J Haematology. 2014;39(4):222-26. [crossref]
34.
Mevada ST, Al Saadoon M, Zachariah M, Al Rawas AH, Wali Y. Impact of burden of thalassaemia major on health-related quality of life in Omani children. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2016;38(5):384-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Jafari-Shakib A, Davoudi-Kiakalaye A, Pour-Fathollah AA, Jafari-Shakib R, Mohtasham-Amiri Z. Health-related quality of life in β-thalassaemia major children in North of Iran. IJBC. 2016;8(4):108-11.
36.
Olivieri NF, Nathan DG, MacMillan JH, Wayne AS, Liu PP, McGee A, et al. Survival in medically treated patients with homozygous beta-thalassaemia. New Eng J Med. 1994;331:574-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Telfer PT, Prestcott E, Holden S, Walker M, Hoffbrand AV, Wonke B. Hepatic iron concentration combined with long-term monitoring of serum ferritin to predict complications of iron overload in thalassaemia major. Br J Haematol. 2000;110:971-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
38.
Mikelli A, Tsiantis J. Brief report: Depressive symptoms and quality of life in adolescents with b-thalassaemia. J Adolesc. 2004;27(2):213-16.[crossref] [PubMed]
39.
Motti F, Christogiorgos S, Diareme S, Kolaitis G, Gilbert L, Samara C, et al. Coping in children with haemophilia and thalassaemia: A cross-national study. Review of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics. International Edition. 2008;22(1):05-17.
40.
Wanapirak C, Tongsong T, Sirivatanapa P, Sa-nguansermsri T, Sekararithi R, Tuggapichitti A. Prenatal strategies for reducing severe thalassaemia in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998;60(3):239-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
41.
Phadke SR, Savita A. Phenotype score to grade the severity of thalassaemia intermedia. Indian J Pediatr. 2003;70(6):477-81. [crossref] [PubMed]
42.
Osborne RH, Lourenco R, Dalton A, Houltram J, Dowton D, Joshua DE, et al. Quality of life related to oral versus subcutaneous iron chelation: A time trade-off study. Value Health. 2007;10(6):451-56.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59166.17642

Date of Submission: Jul 19, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Sep 16, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Dec 02, 2022
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 23, 2022
• Manual Googling: Nov 17, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Nov 04, 2022 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com