Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 17255

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : CC01 - CC05 Full Version

Effect of Anaemia on Sensory Nerve Conduction in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61720.17620
Nirang Jhana, Shuba

1. Senior Resident, Department of Physiology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of Physiology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. N Shuba,
2F, Mayflower Brookefields Apts, 62-A, Krishnasamy Road, RS Puram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: shubaphysio@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) occurs in more than 50% of patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Though multifactorial pathogenesis has been claimed for the occurrence of DPN, the exact mechanism is unclear. Recently, it was found that the prevalence of anaemia is two to three times higher in diabetic patients even with preserved renal function.

Aim: To compare the sensory nerve conduction study variables such as latency (ms), amplitude (μV) and Nerve Conduction Velocity (NCV) (m/s) of the median, ulnar and sural nerves in DPN patients with anaemia to those without anaemia.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Neurology, PSG Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, December 2017 to December 2018 with 80 DPN subjects, included both males and females of age group from 35 to 70 years, grouped into those without anaemia (n=40) and those with anaemia (n=40). Subjects were considered to have anaemia based on the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of haemoglobin. Sensory nerve conduction studies were performed on right and left median, ulnar and sural nerves. Logistic regression was performed in DPN without and with anaemia to rule out confounding variables. Independent t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the variables between the groups with normal and skewed distribution, respectively. The p-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results: Among 80 study participants, 38 (47.50%) were male and 42 (52.50%) were female. About 20 (50%) were male and 20 (50%) were female in group A (DPN without anaemia). Seventeen (42.50%) were male and 23 (57.50%) were female in group B (DPN with anaemia). Among DPN subjects with anaemia, 57.50% had mild anaemia and 42.50% had moderate anaemia. In the present study, normocytic normochromic anaemia was the predominant form of anaemia seen. NCV of right median nerve, right ulnar nerve, right sural nerve and left sural nerve were significantly reduced in DPN with anaemia when compared to DPN without anaemia with values <0.001, <0.001, 0.001 and <0.001, respectively. The amplitude of right sural nerve and left sural nerve were significantly reduced in DPN with anaemia, compared to DPN without anaemia with p-values <0.001 and 0.017, respectively.

Conclusion: The DPN patients with anaemia had lower NCV and amplitude of sensory nerves, when compared to those without anaemia. Hence, even mild to moderate anaemia could be a possible risk factor that exacerbates the severity of DPN.

Keywords

Nerve conduction velocity, Normocytic normochromic anaemia, Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Diabetic neuropathy occurs in more than 50% of individuals with T2DM. It can manifest in the forms of polyneuropathy, mononeuropathy and/or autonomic neuropathy (1). Among the various forms of diabetic neuropathy, Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy (DSPN) accounts for about 75% of the caseload in diabetic neuropathies. It has been found that DSPN might be present in atleast 10-15% of newly diagnosed T2DM patients (2).Though a multifactorial pathogenesis has been claimed for the occurrence of DPN; the exact mechanism for the pathogenesis is unclear. A prevailing view for the pathogenesis of DPN is the inflammatory and oxidative stress. The inflammatory and oxidative stress that occurs as a result of metabolic dysfunction in diabetes mellitus damages the neuronal cells (2).

Anaemia is a common manifestation in diabetes mellitus. The prevalence of anaemia is two to three times higher in diabetic patients compared to the general population even with preserved renal function as opposed to the myth that end-stage renal failure in diabetes is the major cause of anaemia in diabetes (3). Chronic anaemia results in tissue hypoxia leading to diabetes associated organ damage (4). Recently, the association of anaemia with diabetic microvascular complications has identified anaemia as an independent risk factor for predicting the severity of diabetic nephropathy (5), diabetic retinopathy (6) and diabetic neuropathy (4). Despite the increased prevalence of diabetes related anaemia and its well-known microvascular complications, very little research has been conducted to find the association of anaemia with diabetic neuropathy. The pathophysiology of DPN has not been fully understood. Hence, studies that emphasise the association of anaemia; which is a common manifestation even in diabetic patients having preserved renal function with DPN are necessary.

Nerve conduction study, the most sensitive and specific method for assessing the severity of DPN (7) is utilised in the present study. Since the sensory aspects of the peripheral nervous system are more commonly affected than the motor aspects (8), sensory nerve conduction studies have been chosen. The present study was designed to compare the sensory nerve conduction study variables such as latency (ms), amplitude (μV) and (NCV) (m/s) of the median, ulnar and sural nerves in DPN patients with anaemia to those without anaemia. The present study is a part of a larger project. To the best of the knowledge, no similar studies have been reported in Indian population. The hypothesis of the present study is that, the presence of anaemia affects the sensory nerve conduction values in T2DM patients with DPN.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Neurology, PSG Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, from December 2017 to December 2018 in 80 DPN outpatients after getting Institutional Ethics Clearance with IEC number 17/351.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated using Open Epi software version 3.01 using 80% power, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) and mean±SD values of nerve conduction obtained from a study conducted by Wu F et al., (9).

Formula for difference in means:

n=2σ2(Zβ+Zα/2)2/ (d)2

n=Sample size of group
σ=Standard deviation of the outcome variable
d=difference in means
Zβ=Corresponds to desired power (0.84=80% power)
Zα/2=Corresponds to two-tailed significance level (1.96 for α=0.05)

The calculated sample size was 80 subjects, with 40 subjects in each group. Convenience sampling method was employed.

Group A included 40 DPN subjects without anaemia and group B included 40 DPN patients with anaemia. Subjects were considered to have anaemia based on the WHO classification of haemoglobin. According to the WHO, anaemia is defined as haemoglobin less than 12 g/dL in women and less than 13 g/dL in men (10).

Inclusion criteria: The study included both males and females of age group from 35 to 70 years diagnosed with DPN, with duration of diabetes more than one year, and was on treatment. DPN patients with and without anaemia were included in the study. Diagnosis of DPN was made using the criteria proposed in 19th annual NEURODIAB (Diabetic Neuropathy Study group of the European association) and 8th International Symposium on Diabetic neuropathy in Toronto, 2009 (11). DSPN was confirmed, if nerve conduction abnormality was accompanied by either a symptom or sign of neuropathy. The symptoms include decreased sensation, asleep numbness, pricking, stabbing, burning or aching pain that predominantly occurs in toes, feet or leg. The signs include a symmetrical reduction in distal sensation or unequivocally reduced or absent ankle reflexes (11).

Exclusion criteria: The DPN patients with other potential causes of neuropathy such as thyroid disorders, connective tissue diseases, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or neuromuscular disease were excluded from the present study. DPN patients with haemolytic anaemia or aplastic anaemia, with renal failure {estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2} (12), with signs of peripheral vascular disease (ankle brachial index ≤0.9) (13) and with history of cerebral infarction, cervical spondylosis or lumbar spondylosis were excluded from the study. DPN patients with malignancy, with cardiac failure, hepatic failure or poor general conditions, with vitamin B12 deficiency and on chronic use of medications like amiodarone, isoniazid, metronidazole, nitrofurantoin, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, immunosuppressants like TNFα inhibitors, interferons were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

After getting informed and written consent, the data was collected. Recorders Medicare System (RMS) EMG EPM 2K version 1.0 was used to record the sensory nerve conduction parameters such as latency, amplitude and NCV. The active, reference and ground electrodes were used. The position of the electrode in context to the skin where the threshold stimulus produces a response was identified for various nerves of interest and was noted as the site of stimulus. At the optimum site of stimulation for various nerves, the stimulus was given at the rate of one per second. Initially, minimal intensity of stimuli was provided and then increased progressively to supramaximal stimulation intensity in three to four large steps. The recommended filter setting of 10 Hz to 2 kHz, sweep speed of 1 to 2 ms/division and gain of 1 to 5 μV/division was used (14). The 2signal enhancement used was proportional to the square root of the number of trials (14).

Height in cm was measured using a stadiometer. The subject was made to stand upright in the stadiometer upright four hours after the last meal and height was measured between the top of the head and the sole. Weight was measured in an electronic digital weight scale machine with the subject standing upright with feet placed close to each other. Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight in kilogram by square of height in metres and expressed as kg/m2 (15). Blood pressure was recorded using mercury sphygmomanometer with appropriate size cuff in sitting position.

Haematological parameters, glycaemic, lipid and renal parameters were obtained from patients recent records taken less than one month back. The laboratory parameters studied and their normal values are as follows:

Haematological parameters included Haemoglobin (g/dL): 13.3-16.2 g/dL in adult male and 12.0-15.8 g/dL in adult female, Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) (fL): 79-93.3 fL, Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH) (pg): 26.7-31.9 pg. Peripheral smear was used for morphological classification of anaemia. The glycaemic parameters included duration of diabetes in years, Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS) (mg/dL): 75-100 mg/dL, Post Prandial Blood Sugar (PPBS) (mg/dL): <140 mg/dL. Glycosylated haemoglobin- HbA1c (%): 4-5.6%. The renal parameters included Serum Urea (mg/dL): 7-20 mg/dL, Serum Creatinine (mg/dL): 0.7-1.4 mg/dL and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) (mL/min): >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The lipid parameters included total cholesterol (mg/dL): <200 mg/dL, Serum High-Density Lipoproteins (HDL) (mg/dL): >60 mg/dL, Low-Density Lipoproteins (LDL) (mg/dL): <130 mg/dL and triglycerides (mg/dL): <150 mg/dL (16).

The FBS and PPBS were estimated using hexokinase, UV, kinetic methods. HbA1c was assessed using High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). Serum cholesterol and triglycerides were measured using enzymatic endpoint methods. HDL and LDL levels were measured using direct enzymatic assays. Serum urea and creatinine were determined using enzymatic methods. The eGFR was calculated based on Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation (2009).

Statistical Analysis

The data collected were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) IBM software version 24.0. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test the normality of variables. Normally distributed data are presented as mean±standard deviation (SD) and variables with skewed distribution are presented as median (interquartile range). Logistic regression was performed in DPN without and with anaemia, to rule out confounding variables that could influence the results. An independent t-test was used to compare the variables with normal distribution between DPN without anaemia and those with anaemia. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the variables with skewed distribution. The p-value <0.05 (2-tailed) was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The gender distribution was such that, out of the 80 study participants, 38 members (47.50%) were male and 42 members (52.50%) were female. Twenty (50%) were male and 20 (50%) were female in group A (DPN without anaemia). Seventeen (42.50%) were male and 23 (57.50%) were female in group B (DPN with anaemia). Chi-square test was performed between the number of males and females in both groups, which gave p-value=0.6538, there is no statistically significant difference in number of males and females in both groups. The baseline characteristics between DPN without anaemia and DPN with anaemia are given in (Table/Fig 1).

There was no statistically significant difference in FBS, PPBS, HbA1c, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, TGL, serum urea and creatinine between DPN patients without anaemia and those with anaemia. Though there was a statistically significant difference in eGFR between group A and B while performing independent t-test, logistic regression did not produce a significant odds ratio. Similarly, although there was a statistically significant difference in the age, duration of diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure between DPN patients without anaemia and those with anaemia; logistic regression did not produce a significant odds ratio as shown in (Table/Fig 2).

The NCV of the right median nerve, right ulnar nerve, right sural nerve and left sural nerve were significantly reduced in DPN with anaemia when compared to DPN without anaemia. The amplitude of the right sural nerve and left sural nerve were significantly reduced in DPN with anaemia compared to DPN without anaemia as shown in (Table/Fig 3). Out of 40 DPN subjects with anaemia, 23 (57.50%) had mild anaemia and 17 (42.50%) had moderate anaemia. In the present study, normocytic normochromic anaemia was the predominant form of anaemia seen.

Discussion

Peripheral neuropathy is one of the most important microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus, which if not treated, at an early stage may result in significant disability and poor quality of life. The gold standard of diagnosis of DPN has been NCS (17). Anaemia in T2DM has been attributed to erythropoietin deficiency that occurs as a result of diabetic autonomic neuropathy causing efferent sympathetic denervation of the kidneys (3). A study conducted by Sundem L et al., has shown that in nerve crush injury, erythropoietin treatment causes functional recovery of myelin and protects myelin from the effects of nitric oxide exposure (18). Hence, erythropoietin deficiency is hypothesised as the link between anaemia and severity of DPN in T2DM (9).

Anaemia causing reduced microvascular blood flow and oxygenation may result in endoneurial hypoxia (19), which correlates with severity of nerve fibre pathology (20) and may increase the risk of DPN. Anaemia is considered to be associated with oxidative stress which is an important mechanism of DPN (21). Erythrocytes provide antioxidant protection to tissues and organs (22), which is weakened by anaemia resulting in increased free radical production. Imbalance between free radical and antioxidant may lead to oxidative stress and result in endothelial dysfunction resulting in development of DPN (20),(21).

The severity of DPN is indicated in terms of a reduction in amplitude and NCV of the nerves (9). In the present study, DPN patients with anaemia had lower NCV and amplitude of sensory nerves when compared to those without anaemia. Reduced amplitude denotes axonal loss. Anaemia induced low oxygen-carrying capacity exacerbates endoneurial hypoxia, thus resulting in axonal loss and a reduction in amplitude (20). Axonal degeneration and demyelination are the major pathological changes that can affect the impulse conduction in a nerve. NCV is a measure of speed of conduction in nerve fibres. A reduction in NCV doesn’t always occur, unless larger myelinated fibres are lost in random (14).

A study conducted by Wu F et al., showed a reduction in sensory NCV in DPN subjects with anaemia when compared to those without anaemia (9). The exaggerated activity of intracellular aldose reductase in diabetic subjects leads to excess formation of sorbitol within nerve fibres. It was previously thought that, this impermeable intraneural sorbitol accumulation causes osmosis and intraneural swelling affecting conduction velocities (23).

At present, poor energy utilisation theory has been put forth by Greene stating that with an increase in sorbitol, osmolytes such as Myo-inositol, taurine, adenosine were depleted. Phosphatidylinositol and Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) depletion as a result of myo-inositol deficiency lead to a reduction in the activity of protein kinase C and Na+K+ ATPase, respectively. These derangements affect the nerve conduction velocities in diabetes (24). In the present study, the latencies were not significantly affected between DPN without anaemia and those with anaemia. Latency represents the nerve conduction time for the largest cutaneous sensory fibres. Hence, large sensory fibres are not significantly affected by anaemia in the present study.

In a study conducted by Wu F et al., the proportions of moderate/severe neuropathy system score (42.7% vs 24.5%, p<0.001) and moderate/severe neuropathy disability score (51.5% vs 38.0%, p<0.001) were higher in the anaemic group with DPN compared to the non anaemic group (9). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated patients with anaemia possessed an increased risk of DPN (OR=1.906, 95% CI: 1.416, 2.567, p<0.001) and this multivariate logistic regression analysis, they noted anaemia as an independent risk factor of DPN. NCV was lower in the anaemic group with DPN. This is in concordance with the results of the present study.

In a retrospective study done by Yang J et al., on a cohort of type 2 diabetic patients, it was observed that on comparison of non DPN group, haemoglobin level in the DPN group was significantly lower (118.54±16.91 g/L vs 131.62±18.32 g/L, p-value <0.01). The prevalence of DPN increased by 50.1% (95% CI: 42.2–57.0%; p<0.001) per SD decrease in haemoglobin (24). Compared to the highest quartile of haemoglobin, the lower quartiles were associated with a significantly increased risk of DPN in the entire T2DM population (p<0.01) (24).

In the present study, normocytic normochromic anaemia was the predominant form of anaemia. The morphological classification was done based on MCV and MCH in the present study. MCV, MCH values <80 fL and <27 pg was considered to be microcytic hypochromic. MCV, MCH values between 80-100 fL and 27-32 pg were considered to be normocytic normochromic (25). Similar to this, normocytic normochromic anaemia was the most common form of anaemia seen in patients with DPN in a study done by SinhaBabu A et al., (26). In their study, anaemia was found in 68% of diabetic peripheralneuropathy patients. It has been postulated that efferent sympathetic denervation of kidneys as a result of diabetic autonomic neuropathy damages the renal interstitium, with resultant erythropoietin deficiency (27).

Limitation(s)

The limitations of the study include the bias of selection and information could not be avoided, as the study participants were selected from a single centre. Confounding factors were avoided to the best of abilities. The authors could not measure erythropoietin levels of patients, even though EPO deficiency may be a mechanism linking anaemia and DPN in T2DM. Further studies comparing the nerve conduction variables before and after treating anaemia with erythropoietin supplementation must be done. Association of anaemia with DPN subjects without renal compromise needs to be studied further to unravel the pathophysiology.

Conclusion

In the present study, DPN patients with anaemia had lower NCV and amplitude of sensory nerves, when compared to those without anaemia. Special attention is required to prevent DPN in diabetic patients with low haemoglobin levels. Mild to moderate anaemia with normocytic normochromic morphology was the predominant type of anaemia seen. It is seen that, even mild to moderate anaemia could exacerbate the severity of DPN. Anaemia in DPN patients should be recognised early and treated to prevent progression to severe DPN.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Department of Neurology, PSG Hospitals, Coimbatore for allowing the authors, to perform the present study.

References

1.
Powers AC. Diabetes Mellitus.In: Jameson JL. Harrison’s Endocrinology 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education/Medical; 2016. Pp.267.
2.
Pop-Busui R, Boulton AJM, Feldman EL, Bril V, Freeman R, Malik RA, et al. Diabetic neuropathy: A position statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(1):136-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Thomas MC, MacIsaac RJ, Tsalamandris C, Power D, Jerums G. Unrecognised anaemia in patients with diabetes: A cross-sectional survey. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(4):1164-69. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
He BB, Xu M, Wei L, Gu YJ, Han JF, Liu YX. Relationship between anaemia and chronic complications in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Iran Med. 2015;18(5):277-83.
5.
Ritz E. Anaemia and diabetic nephropathy. Curr Diab Rep. 2006;6:469-72. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
He BB, Wei L, Gu YJ, Han JF, Li M, Liu YX, et al. Factors associated with diabetic retinopathy in chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Endocrinol. 2012;2012:157940. Doi: 10.1155/2012/157940. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Boulton AJM, Vinik AI, Arezzo JC, Bril V, Feldman EL, Freeman R, et al. Diabetic neuropathies: A statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(4):956-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Kakrani AL, Gokhale VS, Vohra KV, Chaudhary N. Clinical and nerve conduction study correlation in patients of diabetic neuropathy. J Assoc Physicians India. 2014;62(1):24-27.
9.
Wu F, Jing Y, Tang X, Li D, Gong L, Zhao H, et al. Anaemia: An independent risk factor of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients. Acta Diabetol. 2017;54(10):925-31. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
World Health Organistion. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity [Internet]. WHO. 2011 [cited May 5, 2020]. Available from: http://www.who.int/vmnis/indicators/haemoglobin/en/.
11.
Tesfaye S, Boulton A, Dyck P, Freeman R, Horowitz M, Kempler P, et al. Diabetic neuropathies: Update on definitions, diagnostic criteria, estimation of severity, and treatments. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(10):2285-93. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, Levin A, Coresh J, Rossert J, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: A position statement from kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney International. 2005;67(6):2089-100. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Xu D, Zou L, Xing Y, Hou L, Wei Y, Zhang J, et al. Diagnostic value of ankle-brachial index in peripheral arterial disease: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2013;29(4):492-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Misra DUK. Clinical neurophysiology: Nerve conduction, Electromyography, Evoked Potentials. 3rd ed. Elsevier India; 2014. Pp. 438.
15.
Pan WH, Yeh WT. How to define obesity? Evidence-based multiple action points for public awareness, screening, and treatment: An extension of Asian-Pacific recommendations. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17(3):370-74.
16.
Longo D, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J. Harrisons Manual of Medicine. 18th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2013. Pp.1393-450.
17.
Udayashankar D, Premraj SS, Mayilananthi K, Naragond V. Applicability of Toronto clinical neuropathy scoring and its correlation with diabetes peripheral neuropathy: A prospective cross sectional study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017;11(12):OC10-13. [crossref]
18.
Sundem L, Chris Tseng KC, Li H, Ketz J, Noble M, Elfar J. Erythropoietin enhanced recovery after traumatic nerve injury: Myelination and localized effects. J Hand Surg. 2016;41(10):999-1010. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Nukada H. Ischemia and diabetic neuropathy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;126:469-87. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Tesfaye S. Recent advances in the management of diabetic distal symmetrical polyneuropathy. J Diabetes Investig. 2011;2(1):33-42. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Albers JW, Pop-Busui R. Diabetic neuropathy: Mechanisms, emerging treatments, and subtypes. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2014;14(8):473. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Siems WG, Sommerburg O, Grune T. Erythrocyte free radical and energy metabolism. Clin Nephrol. 2000;53(1 Suppl):S9-17.
23.
Bril V, Ono Y, Buchanan R. Sural nerve sorbitol in patients with diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1160-63. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Yang J, Yar PJ, Wan Q, Huali. Association between hemoglobin levels and diabetic peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. A cross-sectional study using electronic health records. Journal of Diabetes Research. 2017;2017:2835981. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Wintrobe M, Greer J. Wintrobe’s Clinical Hematology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health Lippincott Williams & Wilkims; 2009. Pp.1056.
26.
SinhaBabu A, Chakrabarti A, Karmakar RN. Anaemia and neuropathy in type-2 diabetes mellitus: A case-control study. IJRRMS. 2013;3(3):45.
27.
Craig KJ, Williams JD, Riley SG, Smith H, Owens DR, Worthing D, et al. Anaemia and diabetes in the absence of nephropathy. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(5):1118-23.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61720.17620

Date of Submission: Nov 24, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 24, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Feb 04, 2023
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 29, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 18, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 01, 2023 (10%) [Excluding repository]

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com