Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 53448

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : DC09 - DC13 Full Version

A Study on Subsite-specific Prevalence of Candidiasis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients and its Antifungal Susceptibility Pattern: A Cross-sectional Study

Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI:
Neethu Babu, Chitralekha Saikumar, Jomon Raphael Chalissery

1. Research Scholar, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India; Tutor, Department of Microbiology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Amala Nagar, Kerala, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Jomon Raphael Chalissery,
Professor and Head, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Amala Nagar, Thrissur-680555, Kerala, India.


Introduction: The incidence of candidiasis can vary across various subsites within the head and neck region and is associated with various co-morbidities and risk factors. The increase in the incidence of resistant Non-albicans Candida (NAC) species among these patients and the limited number of available antifungal agents make treatment difficult. A better understanding of the subsite-specific prevalence of candidiasis and its antifungal susceptibility is crucial in enhancing effective control and treatment.

Aim: To determine the subsite-specific prevalence of candidiasis among Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on patients undergoing therapy for head and neck malignancies at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India over a four-year period (January 2019 to December 2022). A total of 276 patients aged 18 to 85 years with squamous cell carcinoma were included. Oral samples were collected from patients who developed candidiasis, and co-morbidities and risk factors were documented. Candida species were isolated and identified. Antifungal susceptibility was determined using the VITEK system, and fluconazole susceptibility was compared with the standard disc diffusion method. Data were entered into an Excel sheet and analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software.

Results: Pharynx was the most frequent site of head and neck malignancy, accounting for 104 cases (37.7%), followed by the oral cavity with 83 cases (30.1%). Among patients with malignancies in the pharyngeal region, a high rate of Candida infection was observed in 42 (43.3%) out of 97 cases. Candida species isolated included C. albicans (56, 57.7%), C. tropicalis (26, 26.8%), C. krusei (8, 8.3%), C. glabrata (3, 3.1%), and C. parapsilosis (4, 4.1%). Sixty-five patients (23.5%) had diabetes, which was statistically significant (p-value <0.05). All C. albicans strains were sensitive to fluconazole. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of voriconazole was very low for all tested Candida species.

Conclusion: Patients with pharyngeal and oral cavity carcinomas are at an increased risk of developing candidiasis during radiotherapy. Diabetes is significantly associated with candidiasis. While C. albicans was the most common species isolated, a significant number of NAC species were also identified. Voriconazole exhibited low MIC values for C. krusei and C. glabrata, suggesting its potential as an alternative treatment option. Obtaining VITEK system identification and susceptibility reports is advisable for borderline values that may not be evident using conventional disc diffusion methods.


Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Fluconazole, Pharynx, Radiotherapy, Voriconazole

Candidiasis, a fungal infection caused by the Candida species, is a common complication in individuals with HNC (1),(2),(3). The prevalence of candidiasis can vary among different subsites within the head and neck region, including the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, nasal area, and the salivary glands (4). Complications associated with candidiasis, such as pain, swallowing difficulties, and compromised nutrition, can significantly impact the well-being of HNC patients (5). Oral candidiasis is frequently observed in individuals with diabetes, as Candida thrives in an environment promoted by heightened blood sugar levels. Despite diabetes being closely associated with systemic problems like hypertension and kidney disease in immunocompromised patients, the direct association with causing candidiasis is evident primarily among individuals with diabetes (6),(7),(8). Tobacco use is associated with a high rate of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis (OPC), and alcohol consumption has been linked to the development of cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx (9),(10),(11). By understanding the cancer subsites with a higher prevalence of candidiasis, healthcare professionals can focus on improving oral health, swallowing function, and overall quality of life in the most affected areas (12),(13).

Over the past few years, there has been a significant rise in the occurrence of infections among immunocompromised patients caused by NAC species. This increase is either equivalent to or surpassing the prevalence of the widely recognised pathogen, C. albicans (4),(14). Azole antifungal drugs are most commonly used in the treatment of oral Candida infections due to their efficacy, oral bioavailability, and tolerability. However, NAC species are more resistant to fluconazole, the most commonly used azole group of antifungal drugs, which makes treatment challenging (15),(16). As the availability of antifungal medications is limited, addressing resistant Candida infections is progressively becoming more challenging. There is a scarcity of information regarding the distribution of candidiasis in specific subsites within the head and neck region and the effectiveness of the various available antifungal agents against C. albicans and NAC strains among HNC patients in this region, where there is a rise in the burden of HNC (17),(18).

A better understanding of the subsite-specific prevalence of candidiasis and its antifungal susceptibility is crucial in enhancing effective control and treatment. The aim of the present study was to identify the subsite-specific prevalence of candidiasis among HNC patients undergoing treatment. The primary objective of the study was to find its association with co-morbidities and risk factors and to detect the antifungal susceptibility of the isolates. The secondary objective of the study was to determine the distribution of Candida species among HNC patients, determine the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of six antifungal agents against the Candida isolates, and compare fluconazole susceptibility using the standard disc diffusion method to provide insights into the reliability of the standard approach in determining fluconazole susceptibility in HNC patients.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India, on patients undergoing Radiation Therapy (RT) for head and neck malignancies. The study was conducted over a four-year period from January 2019 to December 2022.

The study protocol was presented to the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC), and approval was obtained (Ref No. 30/IEC/19/AIMS-11). All participants were provided with information about the study and gave their written consent.

Inclusion criteria: Patients with proven squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who were on antifungal therapy and below 18 years of age were excluded from the study.

Sample size: The study aimed to investigate candidiasis among 276 patients with head and neck malignancies, showing a prevalence ranging from 25-35% (3),(19). Therefore, using an average prevalence (P) of 30%, precision (d) as 20% of prevalence, and a significance level (α) of 5%, the minimum sample size was calculated as 224.

n=(Z1-α12)2 pq/d2

Study Procedure

Swabs were collected from the oropharyngeal region and sent to the microbiology laboratory for preliminary isolation and identification. KOH mounts were prepared to check the presence of yeasts and pseudohyphae. Samples were cultured on Sabouraud’s dextrose agar and Hichrome agar (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt., Limited., Mumbai, India) plates and incubated at 37°C for 24-48 hours. Gram staining was performed for the preliminary identification of Candida (20). Fresh subcultures were then performed on SDA plates to obtain pure cultures for VITEK® 2 Systems identification and MIC detection. Additionally, fluconazole susceptibility was determined using the conventional disc diffusion method. Underlying conditions such as diabetes and hypertension were observed, and factors contributing to the risk, such as tobacco and alcohol use, were documented.

Identification and susceptibility testing using the VITEK® 2 Compact System were conducted following the manufacturer’s instructions. Inoculum was prepared in sterile saline provided by the manufacturer, with a turbidity range between 1.80-2.20 McFarland standard, as per bioMérieux VITEK® 2 DensiCHEK? instrument. VITEK® 2 YST cards were used for identification testing, while VITEK® 2 AST-YS08 cards were used to determine the susceptibility of the yeasts to antifungal agents. The VITEK® 2 AST-YS08 card contained different concentrations of various antifungal agents, including amphotericin B, caspofungin, flucytosine, micafungin, voriconazole, and fluconazole. MIC values were interpreted according to the breakpoints stated in CLSI M27-M44S (21).

Fluconazole susceptibility was tested and interpreted using the standard disc diffusion method, following CLSI M44-A2 guidelines (22). Fluconazole discs (25 μg) were obtained from HiMedia Labs, India. Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 2% glucose was 10used for sensitivity testing. Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC) 3017 from the Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India, was used as the control strain.

Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed using SPSS software (v23, IBM, Illinois, US). Continuous measurements were reported as the mean±Standard Deviation (SD). Categorical measurements were presented as numerical counts along with their respective percentages. The association between co-morbidities and risk factors with candidiasis was determined using the Chi-square test.


The study included 276 patients with HNC. The age range was 31 to 85 years, with an average age of 65. The majority of the patients were men, accounting for 231 (83.7%) cases, with an average age of 65. Women comprised 45 (16.3%) of the patients, with an average age of 65 years. In the current study, the pharynx was the most frequent site of head and neck malignancy, with 104 (37.7%) cases. This was followed by the oral cavity with 83 (30.1%) cases, the larynx with 74 (26.8%) cases, the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses with 8 (2.9%) cases, and the salivary glands with 7 (2.5%) cases of parotid malignancies observed (Table/Fig 1).

Candidiasis was identified in 97 (35.1%) out of 276 patients, with the most prevalent species being C. albicans in 56 (57.7%) cases. Other NAC species, are shown in (Table/Fig 2).

Various Candida colonies of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis were seen on the Hichrome agar plate, as shown in (Table/Fig 3).

In the study, 65 (23.5%) patients were diabetic, and among them, 41 (63.1%) had candidiasis. The association between diabetes and oral candidiasis (OPC) was found to be statistically significant (p=0.0001). However, there was no significant association with risk factors like tobacco and alcohol (p-value >0.05) (Table/Fig 4).

Among the patients with malignancies in the pharyngeal region, a high rate of Candida infection was observed, specifically in 42 (43.3%) out of 97 patients, including 5 (11.9%) out of 42 in the nasopharynx, 22 (52.4%) out of 42 in the oropharynx, and 15 (35.7%) out of 42 in the hypopharynx. Additionally, 37 (38.1%) out of 97 patients with oral cavity malignancies were found to have Candida infection. A total of 16 (16.5%) out of 97 patients with cancer in the laryngeal region had candidiasis (Table/Fig 5).

Candida albicans strains isolated were sensitive to fluconazole by the standard disc diffusion test and to all six antifungal agents tested using the VITEK® 2 Compact System. C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis strains showed 100% susceptibility to fluconazole by the disc diffusion method, as well as to all six antifungals by the VITEK® 2 Compact System. C. krusei strains are inherently resistant to fluconazole, and C. glabrata strains show acquired resistance. The MIC to voriconazole was very low for all the Candida species tested. All the strains were sensitive to micafungin and amphotericin B. Out of the eight C. krusei strains, 2 (25%) showed intermediate susceptibility, and 2 (25%) were resistant to Caspofungin, and all of them were resistant to Flucytosine by the VITEK® 2 Compact System (Table/Fig 6).


The occurrence of oral candidiasis is prevalent in individuals with diabetes, and it has been observed that higher blood sugar levels create a favourable environment for Candida growth. The interplay between hyperglycaemia, impaired immune response, dry mouth, and altered microbial balance contributes to the increased susceptibility to oral candidiasis in individuals with diabetes (23),(24). In the present study, a significant association between diabetes and HNC was found. Out of a total of 65 (23.5%) diabetic patients, 41 (63.1%) had candidiasis during the course of treatment. Gong Y et al., and Abhinav RP et al., in their studies have found evidence indicating an increased risk of developing oral cancer in patients with diabetes and also a higher mortality rate among them (25),(26). Proper management of blood sugar levels, along with appropriate antifungal therapy, is crucial in preventing and treating oral candidiasis in diabetic patients.

According to a study conducted by Bagnardi V et al., it has been demonstrated that even small amounts of alcohol consumption are linked to the development of oral cavity and pharynx cancer, as well as oesophageal cancer (11). In the present study, the highest incidence of cancer was observed in the pharyngeal region, with 104 (37.7%) cases, followed by cancer in the oral cavity with 83 (30.1%) cases. This finding was comparable to a recent study by De Vasconcellos Ferreira PM et al., where the oral cavity accounted for 28 (42.4%) cases and the pharynx accounted for 23 (34.8%) cases (27). However, in the current study, no significant association was found between known risk factors such as tobacco and alcohol consumption. Various studies have indicated a notable increase in the incidence of oropharyngeal cancer in several countries, suggesting that the positive trends in oral and pharyngeal cancer mortality and incidence in certain countries worldwide can be attributed to changes in tobacco and alcohol consumption among men over the past few decades (9),(10),(28).

In this particular study, C. albicans was identified as the most commonly isolated Candida species, followed by NAC species such as C. tropicalis, C. krusei, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis. Similar findings were reported in studies conducted by Wu J et al., where 53.2% of the isolates were C. albicans followed by NAC species like C. tropicalis, C. krusei, and C. parapsilosis, and E Silva VC et al., where C. albicans was the most prevalent species isolated (29),(30). A study conducted in the southern part of India also reported findings consistent with the pattern of isolation observed in this study, with C. albicans being the most prevalent fungal species isolated. NAC species isolated in their study were C. tropicalis, C. krusei, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis (31). However, a separate study conducted in the eastern part of India revealed that NAC species were more prevalent, with C. parapsilosis being the most frequently identified species in that particular region (32).

In the present study, all the C. albicans strains isolated were susceptible to fluconazole by both disc diffusion and the automated method. Generally, C. albicans exhibits good susceptibility to commonly used antifungal agents such as fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole. However, there have been reports of increased resistance to azole antifungals, especially in certain geographic regions or among patients with prior antifungal exposure. NAC species, such as C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, and C. parapsilosis, have shown varying patterns of antifungal susceptibility. C. glabrata is known to have higher acquired resistance to azole antifungals, while C. krusei is often intrinsically resistant to fluconazole. The VITEK® 2 compact system indicated that both of these strains in the present study were resistant to fluconazole. Voriconazole, a triazole antifungal drug, exhibits enhanced antifungal activity compared to fluconazole and is effective against all Candida species, including C. krusei and C. glabrata, which are inherently resistant to fluconazole, as well as fluconazole-resistant C. albicans strains (33),(34). In this study, all the strains of C. krusei and C. glabrata exhibited significantly low (MIC values for voriconazole). Therefore, voriconazole can be considered as a viable alternative drug option for the treatment of infections caused by these specific Candida species. Normally, C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis show good susceptibility to azole antifungal drugs, although there have been reported cases of resistance. In the current study, the C. tropicalis strains were found to be pan sensitive, but their susceptibility to fluconazole was at the borderline level as indicated by the MIC values. All C. parapsilosis strains were sensitive to all the tested drugs, which was in concordance with the results of the study by Erum R et al., (35).


The study included patients exclusively from a single centre. Nevertheless, considering the limited availability of related studies in the current literature, these findings may still hold relevance in the management of OPC in HNC patients undergoing RT.


Patients receiving RT for pharyngeal and oral cavity carcinoma are at an increased risk of developing candidiasis during the course of their treatment. There is a notable association between diabetes and the risk of Candida infection in HNC patients. However, this study did not find an association between alcohol and tobacco use and the occurrence of oral cancer, which could possibly be attributed to changes in lifestyle. Although C. albicans was the most commonly found Candida species, a considerable number of NAC species were also identified. All the C. albicans strains showed sensitivity to fluconazole. Voriconazole exhibited very low MIC values for C. krusei and C. glabrata, suggesting it can be considered as an alternative option for treating infections caused by these strains.

It is advisable to obtain VITEK system identification and susceptibility reports whenever possible, as they can provide insight into borderline values that may not be evident when using conventional disc diffusion methods.


The authors are grateful to Dr. Ajith TA, Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, for his valuable help during the preparation of this manuscript.


Bensadoun RJ, Patton LL, Lalla RV, Epstein JB. Oropharyngeal candidiasis in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiation: Update 2011. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19(6):737-44. [crossref][PubMed]
Deng Z, Kiyuna A, Hasegawa M, Nakasone I, Hosokawa A, Suzuki M. Oral candidiasis in patients receiving radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery. 2010;143(2):242-47. [crossref][PubMed]
Kermani F, Sadeghian M, Shokohi T, Hashemi S, Moslemi D, Davodian S, et al. Molecular identification and antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida species isolated from oral lesions in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Curr Med Mycol. 2021;7(1):44-50. [crossref][PubMed]
Kibwana UO, Manyahi J, Kamori D, Mushi M, Mwandigha AM, Majigo M. Predominance of non-Candida albicans species oral colonisation among patients on anticancer therapy: Findings from a cross-sectional study in Tanzania. BMJ Open. 2023;13(4):e070003. [crossref][PubMed]
Keziah SV, Dharman S, Maragathavalli G. Assessment of onset and progression of chemoradiotherapy induced oral complications in head and neck cancer patients- A prospective study. J Indian Academy of Oral Med Radiol. 2022;34(3):246-53. [crossref]
Zomorodian K, Kavoosi F, Pishdad GR, Mehriar P, Ebrahimi H, Bandegani A, et al. Prevalence of oral Candida colonization in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Mycol Med. 2016;26(2):103-10. [crossref][PubMed]
Belazi M, Velegraki A, Fleva A, Gidarakou I, Papanaum L, Baka D, et al. Candidal overgrowth in diabetic patients: Potential predisposing factors. Mycoses. 2005;48(3):192-96. [crossref][PubMed]
Mohammadi F, Javaheri MR, Nekoeian S, Dehghan P. Identification of Candida species in the oral cavity of diabetic patients. Curr Med Mycol. 2016;2(2):01-07. [crossref][PubMed]
Khalili P, Movagharipoor A, Sardari F, Movaghari Pour F, Jamali Z. Oral candidiasis and cigarette, tobacco, alcohol, and opium consumption in Rafsanjan, a region in the southeast of Iran. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):01-08. [crossref][PubMed]
Chauhan R, Trivedi V, Rani R, Singh U. A study of head and neck cancer patients with reference to tobacco use, gender, and subsite distribution. South Asian J Cancer. 2022;11(01):046-51. [crossref][PubMed]
Bagnardi V, Rota M, Botteri E, Tramacere I, Islami F, Fedirko V, et al. Alcohol consumption and site-specific cancer risk: A comprehensive dose-response meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(3):580-93. [crossref][PubMed]
Cohen EEW, LaMonte SJ, Erb NL, Beckman KL, Sadeghi N, Hutcheson KA, et al. American Cancer Society head and neck cancer survivorship care guideline. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(3):203-39. [crossref][PubMed]
Shabestari SB, Shirinbak I, Azadarmaki R. A comprehensive look at oromaxillofacial and laryngopharyngeal cancers. Cancer Genetics and Psychotherapy. 2017:531-87. [crossref]
Tarapan S, Matangkasombut O, Trachootham D, Sattabanasuk V, Talungchit S, Paemuang W, et al. Oral Candida colonization in xerostomic postradiotherapy head and neck cancer patients. Oral Diseases. 2019;25(7):1798-808. [crossref][PubMed]
Jahanshiri Z, Manifar S, Hatami F. Evaluation of virulence factors and azole resistance mechanisms of Candida tropicalis isolates from head and neck cancer patients with OPC. Iran J Microbiol. 2023;15(1):163-73. [crossref][PubMed]
Singh A, Singh PK, de Groot T, Kumar A, Mathur P, Tarai B, et al. Emergence of clonal fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis clinical isolates in a multicentre laboratory-based surveillance study in India. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(5):1260-68. [crossref][PubMed]
Ganesan S, Sivagnanaganesan S, Thulasingam M, Karunanithi G, Kalaiarasi R, Ravichandran S, et al. Diagnostic delay for head and neck cancer in South India: A mixed-methods study. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2020;21(6):1673-78. [crossref][PubMed]
Kulkarni MR. Head and neck cancer burden in India. Int J Head Neck Surg. 2013;4(1):29-35. [crossref]
Kawashita Y, Funahara M, Yoshimatsu M, Nakao N, Soutome S, Saito T, et al. A retrospective study of factors associated with the development of oral candidiasis in patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: Is topical steroid therapy a risk factor for oral candidiasis? Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(44):e13073. [crossref][PubMed]
Walsh TJ, Hayden RT, Larone DH. Larone’s medically important fungi: A guide to identification. John Wiley & Sons; 2018 Jun 1. [crossref]
CLSI. Performance Standards for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts. 3 rd ed. CLSI supplement M27M44S. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2022.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M44- method for antifungal disk diffusion susceptibility testing of yeasts, 3rd edition, 2018. Available at: https://
Ramos-Garcia P, Roca-Rodriguez MD, Aguilar-Diosdado M, Gonzalez-Moles MA. Diabetes mellitus and oral cancer/oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Diseases. 2021;27(3):404-21. [crossref][PubMed]
González-Moles MÁ, Ramos-García P. State of evidence on oral health problems in diabetic patients: A critical review of the literature. J Clin Med. 2021;10(22):5383. [crossref][PubMed]
Gong Y, Wei B, Yu L, Pan W. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of oral cancer and precancerous lesions: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Oral Oncology. 2015;51(4):332-40. [crossref][PubMed]
Abhinav RP, Williams J, Bennett C, Livingston P, Jebarani S, Pradeepa R, et al. Frequency and association of self-reported oral cancer among individuals with type 2 diabetes at a tertiary care diabetes centre in South India-A retrospective study. J Diabetes Complications. 2022;36(3):108129. [crossref][PubMed]
De Vasconcellos Ferreira PM, Gomes MD, Almeida AC, Cornélio JS, Arruda TJ, Mafra A, et al. Evaluation of oral mucositis, candidiasis, and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer treated with a hypofractionated or conventional radiotherapy protocol: A longitudinal, prospective, observational study. Head Face Med. 2023;19(1):7. [crossref][PubMed]
Chang CP, Siwakoti B, Sapkota A, Gautam DK, Lee YC, Monroe M, et al. Tobacco smoking, chewing habits, alcohol drinking and the risk of head and neck cancer in Nepal. Int J Cancer. 2020;147(3):866-75. [crossref][PubMed]
Wu J, Gan C, Li J, Liu Y, Chen Z, Zhang Y, et al. Species diversity and antifungal susceptibilities of oral yeasts from patients with head and neck cancer. Infect Drug Resist. 2021;14:2279-88. [crossref][PubMed]
E Silva VC, de Cássia Oliveira V, de Sousa ÁF, Bim FL, Macedo AP, de Andrade D, et al. Prevalence and susceptibility profile of Candida spp. isolated from patients in cancer therapy. Arch Oral Biol. 2020;119:104906. [crossref][PubMed]
Krishnan NA, Kurup S, Nair AH, Kumar V. Candida quantification and species identification in patients undergoing postoperative head and neck radiotherapy and combination of chemo-radio therapy. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology. 2021;25(5):4891-900.
Prakash V, Singh RK, Saurabh K, Kumar V, Kumari R, Kumar S, et al. Spectrum of chemo-radiotherapy induced fungal infection in head and neck cancer patients at tertiary care centre of Eastern India. Oral Oncology Reports. 2023;6:100039. [crossref]
Golestannejad Z, Khozeimeh F, Dehghan P, Najafizade N, Faghihian E, Kheirkhah M, et al. Comparison of the antifungal effect of voriconazole and fluconazole on oral candidiasis before and during radiotherapy. Dental Research Journal. 2022;19(1):99. [crossref][PubMed]
Partha AD, Widodo AD, Endraswari PD. Evaluation of fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole activity on Candida albicans: A case control study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;84:104882. [crossref][PubMed]
Erum R, Samad F, Khan A, Kazmi SU. A comparative study on production of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes of Candida species isolated from patients with surgical site infection and from healthy individuals and their co-relation with antifungal drug resistance. BMC Microbiology. 2020;20(1):01-02.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/66418.18509

Date of Submission: Jul 07, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Aug 11, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 05, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 12, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 22, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 02, 2023 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin


JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)