Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 15590

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : BC22 - BC26 Full Version

Association of Baseline Levels of C-Reactive Protein and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Assessing Severity and Mortality among COVID-19 Patients in Three Waves: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62910.18271
Umalakshmi Annavarapu, Suhas Dhulipala, Shailaja Alapaty, Mangala Sirsikar, Jyothi A Natikar, Deepthi Mahendrakar

1. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of Pulmonology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 6. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Umalakshmi Annavarapu,
FB 199, Hal Central Township, Near Borewell Bus Stop, Marathahalli, Bangalore-560037, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: lakshmiannavarapu18@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection has experienced three peaks in India, with possibilities of reinfections and future peaks. A comprehensive understanding of the disease, particularly in terms of inflammatory markers, is crucial. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) have been established as markers of disease severity in COVID-19 during the first wave, but limited data exists regarding these markers in the second and third waves.

Aim: This study aims to investigate the association between baseline levels of CRP and NLR with disease severity and mortality among COVID-19 patients in three waves.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Bangalore from March 2020 to March 2022. The study included clinical data from 1485 patients with COVID-19. CRP and NLR levels were measured on the day of hospital visit, and their association with severity and mortality was assessed. Continuous variables were compared using independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test.

Results: Wave 1 demonstrated a significant increase in CRP and NLR values among patients with critical illness (mean±SD: 11.96±11.9, 12.41±13.7) compared to other categories. The values of these two parameters in other categories of wave 1 were as follows: asymptomatic (2.28±6.0, 3.17±2.0), mild (1.67±3.4, 2.41±2.7), moderate (1.07±1.7, 3.71±2.4), and severe (6.47±7.2, 4.39±4.3). In wave 2, critical illness (10.52±8.9 and 10.73±7.8) showed elevated values compared to other categories (0.957±1.1, 2.61±1.7), (4.90±5.9, 4.27±4.1), (4.84±4.8, 4.03±2.4), (7.35±6.7, 7.10±6.7). In wave 3, the two parameters in critical cases (15.0±17.3 and 16.47±7.6) were elevated compared to other categories (3.67±2.9, 16.44±10.3), (3.3 and 13.9), (3.7±5.9, 19.10±1.6).

Conclusion: CRP and NLR were found to be useful early markers for assessing disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients across all three waves.

Keywords

Acute-phase proteins, Complete blood counts, Inflammatory markers, Pandemic, Pneumonia

The COVID-19 infection is a pandemic disease characterised by diffuse lung inflammation, caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus (1). Genetic recombination and mutations of SARS-CoV-2 have led to different variants that have varying pathogenesis and transmissibility (2). In an effort to reduce morbidity and mortality, age, gender, CRP levels, as well as NLR can be used as economical and practical clinical indicators to predict COVID-19 severity (2).

Feng X et al., found that inflammatory parameters such as white blood cells, lymphocytes, procalcitonin, CRP, and NLR can indicate the progression of COVID-19 (3). NLR takes into account the levels of both neutrophils and lymphocytes for a comprehensive, accurate, and reliable examination. Monitoring CRP and NLR may help physicians recognise high-risk patients. It is beneficial for forecasting disease intensity to reduce clinical outcomes in pneumonia cases (3).

CRP is commonly used as a prognostic marker that indicates ongoing inflammation; it appears in the blood 6-10 hours after tissue inflammation begins and starts decreasing 18-20 hours after the inflammation reduces [4-6]. Furthermore, a complete blood count test, which includes the neutrophil count and lymphocyte count ratio, is an economical predictor of systemic inflammation.

Studies have been conducted to investigate the association between CRP and NLR ratio during the first wave period [7-10], but there are only a few studies (11),(12) available regarding this association during the second or third wave periods. Ziuzia-Januszewska L et al., found that high NLR and CRP levels were predictors of poor outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection among the Polish population during the second and third waves of the pandemic (12).

In an effort to identify severe patients irrespective of the variant of SARS-CoV-2 in an early stage to reduce morbidity and mortality, parameters such as age, gender, CRP levels, as well as NLR can be used as economical and practical clinical indicators to predict COVID-19 severity in three different waves of the disease.

Hence, the present study was conducted to evaluate the association of baseline levels of CRP and NLR with disease severity and mortality among COVID-19 patients in three waves.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital, which is a state government-approved centre for the care of COVID-19 patients and an Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) approved COVID-19 testing centre in Bangalore. Comparative data analysis was performed between COVID-19 patients during March 2020 to February 2021, considered as the first wave of the COVID-19 disease, with the second wave patients from April 2021 to September 2021 and the third wave from November 2021 to March 2022. Waves were determined based on the number of daily new cases recorded in India from internet data sources. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC:VIEC/2021/APP/016), and a waiver for permission was granted.

Inclusive criteria: Patients aged ≥18 years, who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) method using nasal and oropharyngeal swabs, within the study duration, were included.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with comorbid conditions such as heart attacks, trauma, infections, burns, chronic inflammatory diseases like lupus, vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory bowel diseases were excluded.

Sample size estimation: In this study, the data were collected from the medical record section. The total data of 1485 patients were retrieved and investigated for CRP and NLR levels. Out of that, data of 1027 patients during the first wave period, 419 patients during the second wave, and 39 patients during the third wave were collected.

Study Procedure

Data regarding demographic variables (age, gender), serum CRP, NLR levels within 24 hours after hospitalisation, clinical status, and the need for oxygen and ventilator support were retrieved. The data on epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, radiological findings, and outcomes were collected using a data collection checklist from electronic medical records.

After collecting the data, patients were categorised based on disease severity at the time of hospitalisation. Classification was done based on the new guidelines for COVID-19 disease severity by the National Institute of Health (NIH) issued by the Government of India, as described below (13):

Asymptomatic or presymptomatic infection: Individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 using a virological test (i.e., nucleic acid amplification test or antigen test), but have no symptoms.
Mild illness: Individuals with symptoms such as fever, cough, sore throat, malaise, headache, muscle pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste and smell, but without any respiratory symptoms such as shortness of breath, dyspnea, or abnormal chest imaging.
Moderate illness: Individuals with a saturation level of oxygen (SpO2) ≥94% on room air at sea level.
Severe illness: Individuals with SpO2 <94% on room air at sea level, a ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) <300 mmHg, respiratory frequency >30 breaths per minute, or lung infiltrates >50% (13).
Critical illness: Individuals with respiratory failure, septic shock, and/or multiple organ dysfunctions.

Serum CRP was estimated by the Nephelometry method, using the Immage-800 Beckman Coulter fully automatic instrument. The coefficient of variation for the assay was 6.5%. The normal serum CRP levels in adult males and females were <0.8 mg/dL [14,15]. Blood NLR was estimated by the calculation method from neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, which were collected from the complete blood count test. Neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were estimated by the volume conductivity light scatter method in the DXH 900 Beckman Coulter instrument. The normal blood NLR levels in adult males and females were 2-2.33 (15).

Statistical Analysis

The collected data was entered into Microsoft Excel. Continuous variables were presented as mean±standard deviation. Qualitative variables were presented as frequency and percentage. The continuous variables were compared using an independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate, whereas the qualitative variables were compared using the Chi-square test. A two-tailed p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In the present study, out of a total of 1485 COVID-19 positive cases, most of them (752, 73.2%) had mild illness during the first wave period, 221 (52.74%) during the second wave period, but in the third wave, most of them (23, 58.97%) were critically ill cases. In the third wave, there were no asymptomatic cases, and only 1 (2.56%) subject with moderate illness visited the hospital (Table/Fig 1).

The mean age of patients significantly increased as the disease progressed in all three waves of the COVID-19 disease (Table/Fig 2). In all categories, the number of male patients was significantly higher than females in the first and second waves of the COVID-19 disease. In the third wave, males outnumbered females in all categories, but the difference was not found to be significant (Table/Fig 3).

The results indicate that the mean CRP and NLR levels were elevated in asymptomatic cases, followed by lower mean values in mild cases and moderate cases. They were again markedly elevated in severe and critically ill categories during the first wave. Mean CRP and NLR values increased with disease severity and positively correlated with each other in asymptomatic cases, mild cases, moderate cases, and severe cases in the second wave. The mean CRP levels maintained the same levels in mild, moderate, and severe cases and were markedly elevated only in critically ill cases. Mean NLR values were elevated in mild cases, further elevation was found in severe cases, and they maintained the same levels as mild cases in critically ill cases. Mean CRP and NLR values were positively correlated with each other in mild cases, severe cases, and critically ill cases (Table/Fig 4).

In all three waves, the number of deaths in asymptomatic cases was nil. In mild cases during the first wave period, 6 deaths occurred, and during the second wave period, 13 deaths occurred. Among moderate cases during the second wave period, 2 deaths occurred. In severe cases during the first wave period, 6 deaths occurred, and during the second wave period, 19 deaths occurred. Markedly more deaths were found in critically ill cases during the first wave period (11 deaths) and the second wave period (23 deaths). In the third wave, there were no deaths in any category of the disease (Table/Fig 5). In the first and second waves, mean CRP and NLR values were significantly higher in deceased patients compared to survivors (Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

In the present retrospective study, more than 1000 subjects were involved (16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22),(23),(24),(25),(26),(27),(28),(29),(30),(31),(32),(33),(34).

Naess A et al., found that viral infections lead to lymphocytosis, contrary to the present study where SARS-CoV-2 led to lymphopenia (16). Wang D et al., Huang C et al., Guan W-J et al., Yang X et al., and Chan PKS et al., observed that COVID-19 infection presents with lymphopenia (17),(18),(19),(20),(21). The cause of this could be attributed to either viral particles attacking and damaging the cytoplasmic components of lymphocytes or intense cytokine storms inducing apoptosis of the lymphocytes. Similarly, the present study also observed lymphopenia across all categories of COVID-19 infection in all three waves.

Similarly, studies by Ali N, Sharifpour M et al., Clyne B and Olshaker JS, and Gabay C and Kushner I found elevated CRP levels in severe and critical illness across all three waves (22),(23),(24),(25). Alkhatip AAAMM et al., in their study found high NLR levels in all cases of COVID-19 across all three waves (26). Marked elevation of NLR values was seen as the severity progressed, as in studies by Liu J et al., Yang A-P et al., and Erdogan A et al., (27),(28),(29). Significant higher values were found among wave 3 cases compared to waves 1 and 2. These findings are consistent with the findings in the present study.

As found in studies by Shang W et al., Yufei Y et al., and Liu YP et al., an association was found between CRP and NLR values in the present study as well [30-32]. For wave three, due to the omicron variant of the COVID-19 disease, where most people had been vaccinated and the virus was not proving to be as fatal anymore, CRP and NLR still had positive correlations but not significant.

Similar to Peckham H et al., a higher number of males compared to females were infected across all three waves (33). Like in Bonanad C et al., and Yan X et al., this study also supports that for waves 1 and 2, age is an independent predictor of mortality, however not in wave 3 because people with no vaccine presented with more serious symptoms (34). It was also noted that CRP and NLR levels positively correlated with the mortality rate in waves 1 and 2, but no deaths were observed in wave 3.

A comparison of the findings in the present study with contrasting studies is shown in (Table/Fig 7) (16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22),(23),(24),(25),(26),(27),(28),(29),(30),(31),(32),(33),(34),(35).

Limitation(s)

This study has certain limitations. First, only one-time measured NLR and CRP levels within 24 hours of hospitalisation were used for analysis. Serial measurements throughout hospitalisation would have been more helpful. Secondly, there was only one moderate case in wave three. Thus, comparison between waves was limited due to a lack of data. Third, there was a huge difference in sample size among the three waves of different clinical categories of COVID infection. Fourth, genetic sequencing was not done among the three waves of COVID infection to confirm the different variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Conclusion

The study findings revealed that CRP levels did not differ much between the three different waves, but NLR levels greatly increased in wave 3 cases. An association was observed between CRP and NLR levels in each wave, regardless of the variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This research confirms that a combination of older age and male sex, as well as elevated CRP and NLR levels, are independent predictors of disease severity and mortality among Asian Indian patients with COVID-19 in all three waves. As part of future studies, positive cases of COVID-19 will be sent for gene sequencing studies. Collecting specific variant data from gene sequencing and comparing it with the vaccine status of individuals can provide a clearer picture for understanding CRP and NLR variations.

Author contributions: SA supervised the acquisition of the data, analysed and interpreted the data. SD assisted in collecting clinical information about the patients and helped interpret the data. The manuscript was established by UA and JAN. The manuscript was critically reviewed by MNS. All authors edited and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank our management for giving us the opportunity to conduct this research.

References

1.
Mackenzie JS, Smith DW. COVID-19: A novel zoonotic disease caused by a coronavirus from China: What we know and what we don’t. Microbiol Aust [Internet]. 2020;41(1):MA20013. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MA20013.[crossref][PubMed]
2.
Volz E, Hill V, McCrone JT, Price A, Jorgensen D, O’Toole Ã, et al. Evaluating the effects of SARS-CoV-2 spike mutation D614G on transmissibility and pathogenicity. Cell [Internet]. 2021;184(1):64-75.e11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2020.11.020. [crossref]
3.
Feng X, Li S, Sun Q, Zhu J, Chen B, Xiong M, et al. Immune-inflammatory parameters in COVID-19 cases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) [Internet]. 2020;7:301. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ fmed.2020.00301. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Luo X, Zhou W, Yan X, Guo T, Wang B, Xia H, et al. Diagnostic utility of clinical laboratory data determinations for patients with the severe COVID-19. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020;71(16):2174-79. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Gao Y, Li T, Han M, Li X, Wu D, Xu Y, et al. Diagnostic utility of clinical laboratory data determinations for patients with the severe COVID-19. J Med Virol [Internet]. 2020;92(7):791-96. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25770. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Ragab D, Salah Eldin H, Taeimah M, Khattab R, Salem R. The COVID-19 cytokine storm; What we know so far. Front Immunol [Internet]. 2020;11:1446. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01446. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Potempa LA, Rajab IM, Hart PC, Bordon J, Fernandez-Botran R. Insights into the use of C-reactive protein as a diagnostic index of disease severity in COVID- 19 infections. Am J Trop Med Hyg [Internet]. 2020;103(2):561-63. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0473. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Feng Z, Yu Q, Yao S, Luo L, Duan J, Yan Z, et al. Early prediction of disease progression in 2019 novel Coronavirus pneumonia patients outside Wuhan with CT and clinical characteristics [Internet]. bioRxiv. 2020. Available from: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.19.20025296. [crossref]
9.
Russell CD, Parajuli A, Gale HJ, Bulteel NS, Schuetz P, de Jager CPC, et al. The utility of peripheral blood leucocyte ratios as biomarkers in infectious diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect [Internet]. 2019;78(5):339-48. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2019.02.006. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Wang L, Wang Y, Ye D, Liu Q. Review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) based on current evidence. Int J Antimicrob Agents [Internet]. 2020;55(6):105948. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105948. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Khedar RS, Gupta R, Sharma KK, Mittal K, Ambaliya HC, Gupta JB, et al. Biomarkers and outcomes in hospitalised Covid-19 patients: A prospective registry [Internet]. bioRxiv. 2022. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/202 2.07.20.22277718. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Ziuzia-Januszewska L, Januszewski M, Sosnowska-Nowak J, Janiszewski M, Dobrzyn´ ski P, Jakimiuk AA, et al. COVID-19 severity and mortality in two pandemic waves in Poland and predictors of poor outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalised young adults. Viruses [Internet]. 2022;14(8):1700. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v14081700. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Information on COVID-19 treatment, prevention and research [Internet]. COVID- 19 Treatment Guidelines. [cited 2021 Oct 19]. Available from: https://www. covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov.
14.
Tietz NW. Clinical Guide to Laboratory Tests. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1990.
15.
Chemistry Information Manual, IMMAGE ® 800 Immunochemistry System 962248 AR. 2008.
16.
Naess A, Nilssen SS, Mo R, Eide GE, Sjursen H. Role of neutrophil to lymphocyte and monocyte to lymphocyte ratios in the diagnosis of bacterial infection in patients with fever. Infection [Internet]. 2017;45(3):299-307. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-016-0972-1. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalised patients with 2019 novel Coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA [Internet]. 2020;323(11):1061-69. Available from: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1585. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet [Internet]. 2020;395(10223):497-506. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140- 6736(20)30183-5. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2020;382(18):1708- 20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Xia J, Liu H, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med [Internet]. 2020;8(5):475-81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2213- 2600(20)30079-5. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Chan PKS, Chen GG. Mechanisms of lymphocyte loss in SARS coronavirus infection. Hong Kong Med J. 2008;14(Suppl 4):21-26.
22.
Ali N. Elevated level of C-reactive protein may be an early marker to predict risk for severity of COVID-19. J Med Virol [Internet]. 2020;92(11):2409-11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26097. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Sharifpour M, Rangaraju S, Liu M, Alabyad D, Nahab FB, Creel-Bulos CM, et al. C-Reactive protein as a prognostic indicator in hospitalised patients with COVID- 19. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020;15(11):e0242400. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242400. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Clyne B, Olshaker JS. The C-reactive protein. J Emerg Med [Internet]. 1999;17(6):1019-25. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0736-4679(99) 00135-3. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 1999;340(6):448-54. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199902113400607. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Alkhatip AAAMM, Kamel MG, Hamza MK, Farag EM, Yassin HM, Elayashy M, et al. The diagnostic and prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn [Internet]. 2021;21(5):505-14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14737 159.2021.1915773. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Liu J, Liu Y, Xiang P, Pu L, Xiong H, Li C, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts critical illness patients with 2019 coronavirus disease in the early stage. J Transl Med [Internet]. 2020;18(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ s12967-020-02374-0. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Yang AP, Liu JP, Tao WQ, Li HM. The diagnostic and predictive role of NLR, d-NLR and PLR in COVID-19 patients. Int Immunopharmacol [Internet]. 2020;84(106504):106504. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp. 2020.106504. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Erdogan A, Can FE, Gönüllü H. Evaluation of the prognostic role of NLR, LMR, PLR, and LCR ratio in COVID-19 patients. J Med Virol [Internet]. 2021;93(9):5555- 59. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27097. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Shang W, Dong J, Ren Y, Tian M, Li W, Hu J, et al. The value of clinical parameters in predicting the severity of COVID-19. J Med Virol [Internet]. 2020;92(10):2188- 92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26031. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Yufei Y, Mingli L, Xuejiao L, Xuemei D, Yiming J, Qin Q, et al. Utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive protein level for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Scand J Clin Lab Invest [Internet]. 2020;80(7):536- 40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2020.1803587. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Liu YP, Li GM, He J, Liu Y, Li M, Zhang R, et al. Combined use of the neutrophil- to-lymphocyte ratio and CRP to predict 7-day disease severity in 84 hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A retrospective cohort study. Ann Transl Med [Internet]. 2020;8(10):635. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm- 20-2372. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Peckham H, de Gruijter NM, Raine C, Radziszewska A, Ciurtin C, Wedderburn LR, et al. Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission. Nat Commun [Internet]. 2020;11(1):6317. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19741-6. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Bonanad C, García-Blas S, Tarazona-Santabalbina F, Sanchis J, Bertomeu-González V, Fácila L, et al. The effect of age on mortality in patients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis with 611,583 subjects. J Am Med Dir Assoc [Internet]. 2020;21(7):915-18. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.045. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Yan X, Li F, Wang X, Yan J, Zhu F, Tang S, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as prognostic and predictive factor in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A retrospective cross-sectional study. J Med Virol. [Internet]. 2020;92(11):2573- 81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26061.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62910.18271

Date of Submission: Jan 18, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 23, 2023
Date of Acceptance: May 09, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 24, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 19, 2023
• iThenticate Software: May 08, 2023 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com