Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 9513

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : August | Volume : 16 | Issue : 8 | Page : LC06 - LC11 Full Version

Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Regarding Tuberculosis among Outpatients of a Rural Field Practice Area: A Cross-sectional Study in Uttar Pradesh, India


Published: August 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57590.16691
Neha Agrawal, Ashok Kumar, Nawazish Ali, Sandeep Kumar Uppadhaya, Hemant Kumar Singh

1. Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, National Capital Region Institute of Medical Sciences, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, National Capital Region Institute of Medical Sciences, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, National Capital Region Institute of Medical Sciences, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, RVRS Medical College, Bhilwara, Rajasthan, Bhilwara, Rajasthan, India. 5. Assistant Professor cum Statistician, Department of Community Medicine, National Capital Region Institute of Medical Sciences, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Uppadhaya,
Department of Community Medicine, RVRS Medical College,
Bhilwara, Rajasthan, India.
E-mail: usandeepkumar12@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) is a significant cause of morbidity worldwide, especially in the low and middle-income countries like India and is found to be more common in the rural areas. Delays in diagnosis and initiation of treatment along with lower treatment adherence and completion rates have increased the morbidity and mortality of TB in the rural areas. The collation of information accumulated through the assessment of people’s Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) towards TB, helps in charting new health programs for the public, identifying lacunae, and devising interventions based on these lacunae which in turn will help us to achieve the vision of a “TB free India” by 2025.

Aim: To find out KAP and any association amongst them regarding TB among the study subjects.

Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted on patients attending Outpatient Department (OPD) at the Rural Health Training Centre (RHTC) attached to NCR Institute of Medical Sciences, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India, during January 2021 to April 2021. From a sample of 106 patients data of KAP regarding TB was collected via a structured questionnaire which was predesigned and pretested. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to ascertain the association between subjects’ KAP about TB. A p-value <0.05 was taken as the predictor of statistical significance.

Results: Out of 106 patients, 72 (67.92%), 80 (75.47%) and 52 (49.06%) had adequate KAP respectively. Participants having adequate knowledge showed positive attitude and good practices and this association was found to be statistically significant.

Conclusion: The study results reflect that having adequate knowledge of the disease transforms into good practices and a positive attitude towards a person suffering from the said disease as well as helps the people to have a positive frame of mind in case they themselves contract the disease. Health education and behaviour change communication hence needs to be scaled up in rural communities to prevent, detect and treat tuberculosis in order to achieve a TB free India.

Keywords

Behaviour, Community, Health education

TB is a significant cause of morbidity worldwide, especially in low and middle-income countries like India (1). Globally, not only does it rank among the top 10 causes of mortality but is also the main cause of mortality due to a single infectious agent (ranking above Human Immunodeficiency Virus/ Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS) (1). Many social and cultural factors too add to the disease morbidity, making TB a social disease as well (2). India is responsible for one-fourth of the global TB burden (1). As per National TB Prevalence Survey (2019-2021), in the year 2021, TB’s prevalence in India of all forms, for all age groups was 312 per lakh population (3).

In countries such as ours where more population resides in the rural areas (4), the TB incidence in rural areas is found to be either greater than or equal to that of large urban locales, with rural residents having a higher risk of contracting TB disease (5). According to the evidence from National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-4 data, TB was found to be more common in the rural areas of India (6). On the other hand, a study by Pandey S et al., found that although the incidence of TB was more in Urban India, the average duration of disease before cure or mortality was more in Rural India, which could lead to the relatively high prevalence in these settings (7). Delays in diagnosis and initiation of treatment along with lower treatment adherence and completion rates have also been observed in the rural communities. Results of such delays in rural areas manifest as rising disease morbidity and mortality, enhanced transmission risk, and the emergence of drug-resistant forms of TB (5).

Along with this, the rural residents face the added challenges of a lower standard of living, a deficit of health services, traditional beliefs and misconceptions and the deep-rooted stigma of TB disease which reflects the risk that TB poses for the rural dwellers and highlights the importance of health advocacy, communication and social mobilisation in rural communities (8),(9),(10).

Adequate knowledge and attitude not only helps in breaking the transmission cycle of the disease but also helps in reducing the stigma associated with it. The collation of information accumulated through the assessment of people’s KAP towards TB, helps in charting new health programs for the public, identifying lacunae and devising interventions based on these lacunae. This will help not only in achieving a “TB free India” by 2025 but will also help in actualising the Stop TB strategy’s vision of bringing the deaths, disease, and suffering because of TB worldwide to zero levels (11),(12).

Hence, the current study aimed to ascertain the KAP regarding TBs among the study subjects of a rural area.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the village Peepli Khera, one of the rural field practice area attached to NCR Institute of Medical Sciences, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. According to 2011 census, only 46.73% of this village’s residents are literate with a working population of only 33.3% (13). The means of earning in this area is through wage labour, carpentry, painting, farming etc.

The study subjects were the patients attending the OPD (for any illness, unless seriously ill) at RHTC during the study period. Data collection was completed in four months, from January 2021 to April 2021.

Inclusion criteria:

• All the patients from the village Peepli Khera attending the RHTC within the time frame of the study.
• Age ≥18 years.
• Gave consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria:

• Any seriously ill patient.
• Refused to participate in the study.
• Age <18 years.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated using formula of n=Z2pq/d2; taking 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 10% absolute error (d) and p as 45.5% (based on the study done by Angeline GG et al., in the year 2018 in a rural area of Tamil Nadu where 45.2% of the study subjects had adequate knowledge about TB) (14). Based on the above assumptions and by adding 10% non-response rate to the initial sample size, the final sample size was 106.

Ethical Considerations and Data Collection: Before data collection, ethical permission was obtained from Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) (IEC19/NCRIMS006/Com.Med/003-0P/08-12-2020). The study participants were briefed about the purpose and nature of the study. After taking informed consent, data was collected by pretested structured questionnaire. The questionnaire for the study was prepared after an extensive review of pertinent literature (8),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13),(14). The data collection tool was first generated in the English language and was then backward translated to the local (Hindi) language. The tool includes the participant’s socio-demographic details (age, gender, education, occupation, and income) and questions on the participant’s knowledge, attitude, and practices about TB. The collection of data was done through face-to-face interviews. Before data collection, a pilot study was conducted for validation of the questionnaire.

Statistical Analysis

The data was analysed using International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 and were expressed as proportions. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to ascertain the association between subjects’ KAP about TB. A p-value >0.05 was taken as the predictor of statistical significance.

The questionnaire consisted of eight questions to assess participants’ knowledge and four each to assess their attitude and practice respectively. A correct response for every question was assigned a score of 1 and a score of 0 was given for every incorrect response or answer not given/known. The total score was generated by adding all the correct responses. If the resultant total scores of the respondents exceeded 50%, they were categorised as having “adequate knowledge” (total correct score >4), “positive attitude” (total correct score >2), and “good practice” (total correct score >2), otherwise, they were categorised as having “inadequate knowledge” “negative attitude” and “poor practices” (14).

Results

A total of 106 subjects participated in the study. Participants involved in this study were in the age group of 18-73 years. The mean age (±standard deviation) of the participants was 39.42 years (±14.64). The socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants are summarised in (Table/Fig 1).

Knowledge of the participants about the cause, symptoms, transmission, prevention and treatment of TB:

72 (67.92%) of the study subjects had adequate knowledge on TB (Total correct response was >50%). (Table/Fig 2) summarises the different components of participants “knowledge” towards TB. The most common symptom of TB mentioned by the study subjects was cough (82.08%) followed by weight loss (73.58%), fever (55.66%) and loss of appetite (50.0%). The majority of the participants (83.96%) were knowledgeable about the communicability of the disease. Transmission of TB through air was correctly reported by only 41 (38.68%) of the subjects. As few as 29 (27.36%), study subjects knew that TB is caused by bacteria. Although, most of the participants (71.70%) knew TB to be a curable disease only 48 (45.28%) participants were aware that its transmission is preventable. Three-quarters of the respondents (75.47%) were cognizant of the fact that TB could be cured through medications available at health facilities.

Attitude of the participants towards TB:

Attitude of study participants towards TB is summarised in (Table/Fig 3). Overall 80 (75.47%) of the participants had positive attitude towards TB. About 38 (35.85%) of the subjects considered TB as a very serious disease and 8 (7.55%) as not serious illness. The majority of the participants (73.58%) also knew that anyone could get TB. Regarding the “participant’s reaction,” if diagnosed with TB, 43 (40.57%) said they would experience fear, while only 18 (16.98%) participants said that they will confidently deal with it. On probing about their behaviour towards people suffering from TB, majority of the participants (78.30%) responded that they would feel compassion for them; of these 64 (60.38%) of the subjects were willing to help while the rest would try and avoid the diseased persons.

Practices of the participants towards TB:

The study population’s practices’ regarding TB have been outlined in (Table/Fig 4). Almost half of the study subjects (49.06%) had good practices regarding TB. The number of study subjects who opined that they would seek medical aid as soon as they realised that their symptoms could be due to TB, would take treatment from a health centre, and consult a doctor/other health personnel in case they contracted TB was almost similar; 49 (46.23%), 52 (49.06%), and 48 (45.28%) respectively. Regarding the community’s behaviour towards people suffering from TB, most of the study participants responded that although the people are cordial they tend to stay away from the diseased person (43.40%).

Broadly, adequate knowledge, positive attitude, and good practice regarding TB was found in 72 (67.92%), 80 (75.47%), and 52 (49.06%) participants respectively. Adequate knowledge was significantly associated with positive attitude as well as good practice (Table/Fig 5), (Table/Fig 6), (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

Good knowledge, positive attitude and good practices are essential for the elimination of TB. The current study, which was carried out among 106 adult rural inhabitants of Uttar Pradesh, India, exhibits the respondents’ KAP regarding TB, which are further deliberated upon as follows.

Knowledge Regarding TB

In the current study, 72 (67.92%) participants had adequate knowledge about TB as a disease. These results are in sync with studies carried out by Bashorun AO et al., (15) in Gambia and Laiby et al., (16) in Mumbai where 66.9% and 60% of the participants had good knowledge regarding TB. On the other hand, Angeline GG et al., in their study done on a rural population in Tamil Nadu reported that only 45.5% of their study population had adequate knowledge about TB (14).

The knowledge on the bacteria or infection by germs as the cause of TB was limited (27.36%); this low awareness on the cause has also been reported in various studies ranging from as low as 2% to as high as 60.2% (16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22). This difference in knowledge can be attributed to the geographical area and the education level of the study subjects. Awareness on the causal factor of disease is very essential as it influences the patient’s health seeking behaviour.

As for the knowledge of the symptoms of TB, 87 (82.08%) respondents knew cough as the main symptom of TB. More than half of the respondents were also aware about other TB symptoms such as fever, weight loss and loss of appetite. This heightened awareness of TB symptoms is encouraging as this can improve passive case finding. These results are in tune with the study done by Jangid VK et al., in Bikaner, where 81.3% of the subjects and study by Shidam UG et al., in rural area of eastern Maharashtra where 80% of the participants mentioned persistent cough as the most common symptom (17),(23). Similar results were also reported in the midline survey done by International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. The survey found that most of the general population was aware of “cough of 2 weeks” as a TB symptom (83%) (24). In various other international studies, the percentage of people acknowledging persistent cough as one of the major symptoms of TB ranges from 39.4 to 85.5% (18),(21). Being aware of the symptoms of TB is very crucial as it helps the patients as well as their peers and family members who have similar symptoms to seek medical aid at the earliest.

About 89 (83.96%) of present study participants’ knew TB to be an infectious disease. In comparison, a slightly higher proportion of awareness about the communicability of TB was reported by Konda SG et al., in their study subjects (87%) (25). This difference may have arisen because of the difference in the study area, which was an urban township in the latter while present study was carried out in a rural area. Studies by Angeline GG et al., (79%), Jangid VK et al., (77.4%), Tolossa D et al., (80%), and Sonawane NS and Patil CR (58.67%) have all reported a lower proportion of study subjects aware of the infectiousness of the disease (14),(17),(20),(26).

In the present study, not even half of the respondents (45.28%) knew that the transmission of TB can be prevented. Angeline GG et al., and Sonawane NS and Patil CR reported even a lower proportion of study subjects (35.3% and 36.36 % respectively) aware that TB transmission is preventable (14),(26). Various other national and international studies have reported the percentage of participants mentioning that TB can be prevented ranging from 58.6% to as high as 98.2% (16),(20),(21),(27),(28). Awareness about the infectivity and transmission among the people will help in reducing its spread to family members and community as this knowledge will help them inculcate infection control and prevention practices of tuberculosis (24).

About 71.70% of this study subjects were aware that TB is curable which is in agreement with the study done by Angeline GG et al., where 71% of the participants knew that TB can be cured (14). Several other studies have reported slightly higher percentage of this knowledge, spanning from 80.3-94.4% (14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(20),(23),(24),(26),(27),(28).

It has been reported in literature that adequate knowledge influences people’s practices against infectious diseases (29). Based on present study findings, it can be inferred that though the participants’ aggregate knowledge about TB (67.92%) was better than in some other countries (21),(30); still a lot more awareness needs to be spread among the general population if we are to achieve the target of eliminating tuberculosis by 2025 (12).

Attitude Towards TB

In the current study around one-third (36%) of the respondents considered TB to be a very serious disease. This shows a lax attitude towards a disease whose one-fourth global burden our country contributes to. This result was in agreement with the study of Angeline GG et al., where too less than half of the respondents (41.7%) were aware that TB is a very serious disease (14). Most of the other studies have shown a higher proportion of respondents (52.8% to 80%) aware about the seriousness of TB as a disease (14),(15),(17),(19),(22),(24),(26). This difference could be because the current study subjects were from a rural area, of low socio-economic status and mostly illiterate.

Fear and embarrassment is a major emotion that the infected person may feel on being diagnosed with TB for fear of apathy, stigma and discrimination from the community (24). Most of the respondents (40%) in the current study reported that they would feel afraid if they were diagnosed with TB while one-fifth of them were not sure of their feeling if diagnosed with the disease. Only a handful of the participants (16.98%) said that they would face the situation with hope and confidence. Going through the literature we find that fear and embarrassment is a predominant emotion, from as low as 32% to as high as 69.3% that the participants would feel if diagnosed with the disease (14),(15),(19),(18),(26).

It was seen that having adequate knowledge about TB translated to a positive attitude among the participants and this association was found to be statistically significant. Hence, efforts should be concentrated on educating the masses about TB so as to bring about a positive behavior change among the people in their conduct towards people suffering from TB.

The overall positive attitude towards TB in the current side was 75.47% which is quite better than some other studies (14),(15),(21),(30) and little less than the study conducted in urban adults by Laiby et al., where 88.5% of study participants had an overall favorable attitude towards TB (16).

Practices Related to TB

When it came to the practices related to TB, almost half (49.06%) of the study subjects opined that in case they developed symptoms of TB they will visit a health facility. This result is in sync with the study of Angeline GG et al., where 49% of the participants too had the same response (14). Although, some international studies have reported a higher percentage, where the majority of the participants responded that they would visit a health facility if they felt that they had symptoms of TB (16),(19). This is indicative of good health seeking behaviour and efforts should be directed towards educating the people to seek medical help as soon as they develop anyone of the TB presumptive symptoms.

According to the participants, help from the community for the diseased people was also not forthcoming as most of the villagers try to avoid them (43%). The level of knowledge of the respondents about TB also influenced their practices. This underlies the importance of educating the masses regarding TB, so that, they may extend their support to TB patients. Such practices perpetuate and sustain stigma and discrimination toward TB patients in the communities and they need to be identified and eliminated at the earliest if we want to achieve our vision of a TB free India (24).

In the present study, the aggregate good practice toward TB was 49.06%. This result is slightly better than a study carried out in Iran where the proportion of aggregate preventive practices toward TB was found to be 42.6% (27). On the other hand, some other studies have reported a higher proportion of study subjects with good practices towards TB (15),(16),(30). This difference could be because these studies were either from other countries or were carried out in urban areas and hence, the study subjects may have had better access to health services, media, and/or better health literacy through effective health education programs.

Limitation(s)

The current study was carried on a small scale with only 106 study subjects and covered only the rural population. Conducting the study on a larger scale with more diverse populations would have yielded more generalisable conclusions and a more comprehensive visualisation of the people’s knowledge, attitude and practices related to TB.

Conclusion

The study results reflect that having adequate knowledge of the disease transforms into good practices and a positive attitude towards a person suffering from the said disease as well as helps the people to have a positive frame of mind in case they themselves contract the disease. Health education and behaviour change communication hence needs to be scaled up in rural communities to prevent, detect and treat tuberculosis in order to achieve a TB free India.

References

1.
WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report 2021 Available from: 9789240037021-eng.pdf. [Last accessed on 2022 Apr 10].
2.
Ali M. Treating tuberculosis as a social disease. The Lancet. 2014;383:2195. [crossref]
3.
National TB Prevalence Survey India 2019-2021. Available from: https://tbcindia.gov.in/showfile.php?lid=3659. [Last accessed on 2022 Apr 20].
4.
Park K. Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. 25th ed. Jabalpur: M/S Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers; 2019; p. 535-36.
5.
Stop TB Partnership. Global Plan to End TB and key populations. Key Populations brief (Rural Population). https://stoptb.org/assets/documents/resources/publications/acsm/kp rural spreads.pdf. [Last accessed on 2022 May 31].
6.
Mazumdar S, Satyanarayana S, Pai M. Self-reported tuberculosis in India: Evidence from NFHS-4. BMJ Global Health. 2019;4:e001371. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Pandey S, Chadha VK, Laxminarayan R, Arinaminpathy N. Estimating tuberculosis incidence from primary survey data: A mathematical modeling approach. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;21(4):366-74. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Sreeramareddy CT, Qin ZZ, Satyanarayana S, Subbaraman R, Pai M. Delays in diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in India: A systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18(3):255-66. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Cai J, Wang X, Ma A, Wang Q, Han X, Li Y. Factors associated with patient and provider delays for tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120088. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
National Tuberculosis Elimination Program. Strategy to End Stigma and Discrimination Associated with Tuberculosis. https://tbcindia.gov.in/showfile.php?lid=3588. [Last accessed on 2022 May 30].
11.
WHO. Global Tuberculosis Programme. The End TB Strategy. https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/the-end-tb-strategy. [Last accessed on 2022 Apr 21].
12.
National strategic plan for tuberculosis elimination 2017-2025. https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/NSP%20Draft%2020.02.2017%201.pdf. [Last Accessed on 2022 April 21].
13.
Census India. Population Finder 2011. https://censusindia.gov.in/census.website/data/data visualizations/PopulationSearch_PCA_Indicators.[Last accessed on 2022 April 21].
14.
Angeline GG, Gopalakrishnan S, Umadevi R. Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding pulmonary tuberculosis in a rural area of Tamil Nadu, India: A cross sectional study. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5:4055-64. [crossref]
15.
Bashorun AO, Linda C, Omoleke S. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards uberculosis in Gambia: A nation-wide cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1566. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Laiby R, Debjani P, Prashant B. Knowledge, attitude and practices towards tuberculosis: Study amongst urban adults visiting the community health center. Int J Med Public Health. 2022;12(1):28-32. [crossref]
17.
Jangid VK, Agrawal NK, Yadav GS, Pandey S, Mathur BB. Knowledge and awareness of the tuberculosis in tuberculosis patients at a tertiary care centre in North West Rajasthan, India. Ntl J Community Med. 2016;7(4):262-68.
18.
Datiko DG, Habte D, Jerene D, Suarez P. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to TB among the general population of Ethiopia: Findings from a national cross-sectional survey. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0224196. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Elbur A, Yousif M, Ottoa P, Bayoumi A. Knowledge of tuberculosis: A survey among tuberculosis patients in Omdurman, Sudan. Sudan J Public Health. 2007;2:21-28.
20.
Tolossa D, Medhin G, Legesse M. Community knowledge, attitude, and practices towards tuberculosis in Shinile town, Somali regional state, eastern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Kasa AS, Minibel A, Bantie GM. Knowledge, attitude and preventive practice towards tuberculosis among clients visiting public health facilities. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12:276. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Kigozi NG, Heunis JC, Engelbrecht MC. Tuberculosis knowledge, attitudes and practices of patients at primary health care facilities in a South African metropolitan: Research towards improved health education. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:795. Doi 10.1186/s12889-017-4825-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Shidam UG, Talapalliwar MR, Thakre SB. Knowledge and attitude regarding tuberculosis in a rural area of eastern Maharashtra: An implication for advocacy and communication strategy planning in the national program. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2020;7:1485-91. [crossref]
24.
Sagili KD. Knowledge, attitude and practice about tuberculosis in India-A Midline Survey 2013. (Online). International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, South East Asia. 2014. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280531814_Knowledge_Attitude_and_Practice_about_Tuberculosis_in_India_-2013. [Last Accessed on 2022 Apr 27].
25.
Konda SG, Melo CA, Giri PA. Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding tuberculosis among new pulmonary tuberculosis patients in a new urban township in India. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2016;5:563-69. [crossref]
26.
Sonawane NS, Patil CR. Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding tuberculosis among the patients attending a tertiary care hospital in Maharashtra, India: A cross sectional study. Int J Adv Med. 2019;6:371-75. [crossref]
27.
Chinnakali P, Ramakrishnan J, Vasudevan K, Gurumurthy J, Upadhyay RP, Panigrahi KC. Level of awareness about tuberculosis in urban slums: Implications for advocacy and communication strategy planning in the National program. Lung India Off Organ Indian Chest Soc. 2013;30(2):139-42.17. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Sharma N, Malhotra R, Taneja DK, Saha R, Ingle GK. Awareness and perception about tuberculosis in the general population of Delhi. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2007;19(2):10-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Launiala A, Honkasalo ML. Ethnographic study of factors influencing compliance to intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy among Yao women in rural Malawi. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101(10):980-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Sreechat S, Hongsranagon P. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and preventive behavior of pulmonary tuberculosis among Myanmar refugees in Ban Mai Nai Soi temporary shelter, Mae Hong Son, Thailand. J Health Res. 2013;27(6):391-98.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57590.16691

Date of Submission: May 10, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 19, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jul 14, 2022
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 16, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jul 07, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jul 28, 2022 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com