Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 117386

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : ZE20 - ZE25 Full Version

Unravelling Multifaceted p73: From Cell Kinetics to Therapeutics


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57670.16677
Anitha Dayakar, Pushparaja Shetty

1. PhD Scholar, A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India; Reader, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, KVG Dental College, Sullia, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Anitha Dayakar,
PhD Scholar, A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Deralakatte, Mangalore-575018, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: anithadayakar99@gmail.com

Abstract

The p73 gene is an important member of the p53 gene family, which includes p53, p63, and p73 genes. The p73 gene was identified by McKeon’s group in 1997 and localised to 1p36 region. The p73 shows a complex interplay with both, p53 and p63 genes. Similar to p63, but unlike p53, p73 has an important role in development especially neuronal development, apart from tumourigenesis. The p73 gene plays a vital role in the development of tumours and exhibits both tumour suppressor and oncogenic behaviour. This dual function is attributed to the presence of the two different variants: TAp73 and ΔNp73 with mutually divergent functions. There exists a dynamic relationship between the multiple p73 isoforms. The p73 has a major role in regulating apoptosis, and Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) damage related cell cycle arrest. It can replace p53 in various apoptotic pathways, as it is capable of transcription of p53 responsive genes. The p73 also participates in myriad processes including angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transformation, senescence, and maintaining genomic stability. The p73 overexpression has been detected in a number of human cancers. Since it is frequently overexpressed rather than mutated, it is a promising potential candidate for developing therapeutic strategies in various cancers as well as, for predicting the prognosis. It is also implicated in the lack of response to chemotherapeutic drugs. However, the entire spectrum of cellular mechanisms with respect to p73 is still not understood clearly. This article explores the multiple roles of p73, especially in tumour development processes, and also, its recent novel applications in therapeutics.

Keywords

Apoptosis, Immunohistochemistry, p53 family, Tumour suppressor

The p53 family includes p53, p63, and p73 genes. These genes show considerable structural homology and also share common functions like apoptosis and cell cycle arrest (1). Although the p53 gene has been reported as mutated in 50% of the cancers, p73 seldom shows mutation, instead, it may show overexpression in many tumours (2). The p73 is mapped to chromosome 1p36.2-3, a region that is reported to be lost frequently in many human neoplasms including neuroblastoma (3).

The p73 gene was initially reported in 1997, as a p53-like gene since it showed considerable homology with p53, especially in the DNA binding domain. It was observed that the p53 gene could regulate many of the p53 target genes, thereby triggering apoptosis. The p73 was subsequently localised to the chromosome 1p36.3, locus which was known to harbour a tumour suppressor gene related to neuroblastoma, melanoma, breast, and prostate cancers (3),(4).

Kaghad M et al., in 1997, reported the identification of a new gene p73 with remarkable similarity to the DNA binding domain and oligomerisation domain of p53. The investigators noted that p73 was capable of inducing p21 and also, the presence of two splice variants, p73α and p73β (3).

De Laurenzie V et al., identified two novel p73 splice variants namely p73ϒ and p73δ showing varied transcriptional functions. Simultaneously, De Laurenzie V et al., also reported two isoforms differing in the C-terminal region due to alternative splicing, one isoform was similar to p73ϒ, while the other was labelled as p73ε (5).

The p73 gene is approximately 60 kb in length, with 14 exons (6). It encodes two different proteins, which show mutually antagonistic functions:

1. Full-length Transcriptionally Active TAp73 isoforms.
2. NH2 terminal truncated dominant-negative ΔNp73 isoforms (4).

As a member of the p53 family, the p73 structure shows the presence of an Amino-terminal Transactivation Domain (TAD), a central DNA Binding Domain (DBD), and a carboxy-terminal Oligomerisation Domain (OD). The p73 also contains a carboxy-terminal Inhibitory region and an additional Sterile α Motif (SAM) (7).

The p73 protein sequencing showed a 63% similarity with p53 in the DNA binding domain, 29% similarity in the TAD, and 42% similarity in the OD (7).

Like other p53 family members, p73 has two promoters, P1, which is located upstream of exon 1, and P2, which is present within exon 3. The presence of alternative promoters and splicing leads to the encoding of different isoforms. Transcribing from the P1 promoter produces TA isoforms of p73. The amino terminal truncated Np73 isoforms are obtained using the alternative P2 promoter (6),(7).

Studies have identified various TAp73 isoforms (α, β, ϒ, δ, ε, θ, φ, η, and η1) generated by splicing at the C-terminus site, TAp73α and TAp73β being considered most responsive to p53 targets (7),(8). Splicing at the NH2 terminal gives rise to six other p73 isoforms which include ΔNp73α, ΔNp73β, ΔN’p73α, ΔN’p73β, Ex2Delp73, and Ex2/3Delp73 (7). The ΔN isoforms are generated by the truncation of the transactivation domain at the N terminus end, these isoforms, exhibit inhibitory functions with respect to p53 and TAp73 isoforms (4),(7),(9).

The TAp73 shares many functions native to p53, like inhibition of cell cycle progression, apoptosis, cell metabolism, and ageing. This is made possible by the fact that TAp73 is capable of triggering the transcriptional targets of the p53 gene, like p21/waf1 gene, involved in cell cycle regulation, p53 Upregulated Modulator of Apoptosis (PUMA), NOXA, Bcl-2 Associated X protein (BAX), and p53 Inducible Gene 3 (PIG3) associated with apoptosis, and GADD45, 14-3-3-σ, and p53 AIP1 (9).

Studies on reporter and gel shift assays concluded that TAp73, as well as TAp63 activate the p53 amenable targets to mediate apoptosis (9),(10).

In contrast, ΔNp73 isoforms function as a powerful dominant-negative inhibitor of TAp73, TAp63, and p53. The ultimate outcome of this interplay depends on the TA/ΔN p73 ratio (9). Two mechanisms of ΔNp73 dominance over TA isoforms have been put forward:

1. Promoter competition: This involves blocking the target gene promoters by ΔNp73 since they share a similar DNA binding domain. This process prevents TA isoform transcription.
2. Heterocomplex formation: ΔNp73 isoforms generate hetero-oligomeric complexes, which are incapable of inducing transcription themselves, and also block the TA isoforms (7),(11).

The p53 and TAp73 control ΔNp73 levels via transcription from the P2 promoter of p73 gene.

Although p73 was considered a tumour suppressor gene, paradoxically, mouse knockout models for p73, failed to show increased tumour formation or early mortality as observed in p53 null animal models. Rather, the p73 knockout mice showed brain development abnormalities like hippocampus dysgenesis, hydrocephalus due to hypersecretion from choroid plexus, and mucous hypersecretion from respiratory mucosa leading to inflammation and infection (12).

ROLE OF p73 GENE

p73 and Development

p73 plays a pivotal role in development and differentiation with a distinct biological role. It is necessary for neuronal differentiation, nervous system, and olfactory system development (11).

p73 has been proposed as the guardian of the male germline. TAp73 null mice show increased DNA damage in spermatogonia, which results in male infertility because of derangement of spermatogenesis (13).

p73 and Genomic Stability

p73 performs an important role in spindle assembly during mitosis. The absence of TpA73, leads to the inability to initiate or maintain cell cycle arrest, triggering genomic instability. TAp73 loss increases spontaneous or carcinogen-induced tumour formation and also infertility because of genomic instability of the oocyte (11).

The p73 gene, especially TAp73 performs a paramount role in maintaining genomic stability during cell division. Loss of p73 leads to aneuploidy and polyploidy due to aberrant cyclin/Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDK) complex activation. p73 interaction with BubR1 is necessary for Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) functioning. Loss of TAp73 leads to defective SAC, which fails to assist the mitotic cells culminating in aneuploidy, cancer, and infertility (7).

The p73 gene also acts as a safeguard mechanism in the prevention of abnormal mitosis by regulating cell death during prolonged mitotic arrest or dysfunctional spindle assembly checkpoint activity (7).

p73 and Apoptosis

The mainstay of p73 as a tumour suppressor gene is because of its contribution toward apoptosis. p73 mRNA levels are upregulated as a consequence of E2F1 mediated transcription. The Tp73 gene possesses multiple E2F1 binding sites in its promoter region which facilitate E2F1 binding and transcription. p73 activation further leads to transactivation of downstream p53 responsive genes and apoptosis.

Conversely, the activity of ΔNp73 isoforms in p73 mutants leads to an inhibition of E2F1 mediated apoptosis, in p53-null Mouse Embryo Fibroblasts (MEF) and p53- defective tumour cell lines (9).

p73 induced apoptosis can be broadly segregated as:

1. Transcription-dependent p73- related apoptosis.
2. Transcription-independent p73-related apoptosis.

Transcription-dependent p73 related apoptosis: It Involves p73 modulated transactivation of various pro-apoptotic genes. Apoptotic activity of p73 is usually attributed to its transactivation of pro-apoptotic genes, which include PUMA, NOXA, Bax, GRAMD4, Apoptin, and CD95. The role of p73 is to transactivate the effector genes, thus, indirectly inducing them to initiate apoptosis in the cytoplasm or mitochondria. p73 directly transactivates PUMA following DNA damage and facilitates Bax translocation to the mitochondria, leading to the liberation of cytochrome c, which in turn, results in apoptosis (2),(14),(15).

GRAMD4: It is another pro-apoptotic gene transactivated by p73 and undergoes mitochondrial translocation. GRAMD4, itself, is responsible for Bax upregulation, promoting apoptosis. GRAMD4 responds only to p73, and not to p53, thus, making it a selective mechanism restricted to the p73 gene (15).

Apoptin: Apoptin overexpression leads to TAp73 stablilisation via the p73 Induced RING 2 protein (PIR2) pathway followed by transactivation of the downstream pro-apoptotic genes like PUMA. PIR2 is also capable of ΔNp73 degradation, further stabilising pro-apoptotic TAp73 (16).

CD95: TAp73 transactivates CD95 causing apoptosis through a caspase-dependent mechanism via death receptor CD95 through the extrinsic pathway (15).

Transcription-independent p73-related apoptosis: The mechanism is not fully understood. It is associated with cytoplasmic localisation of p73. Predominantly, this type of apoptosis is modulated by WW domain-containing Oxidoreductase (WWOX). Another mechanism involves Ran-binding Protein 9 (RanBP9) in the mitochondria, leading to stabilisation of p73 levels at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional stages (15).

Bcl family proteins: p73 is capable of modulating apoptosis by a novel pathway directly interacting with the Bcl-2 family proteins in the mitochondria (15).

Tumour Necrosis Factor-related Ligand (TRAIL): In Death receptor-ligand TRAIL-mediated apoptosis, TAp73 undergoes sequestration by caspases 3 and 8, and the recombinant products induce cytochrome c release from the mitochondria (7),(17),(18).

p73 Reaction to DNA Damage and Genotoxic Stress

DNA damage leads to p73 multi-site phosphorylation by non-receptor kinase c-abl, ultimately culminating in p73 protein stabilisation and triggering apoptosis (19). Ionising radiation leads to activation of c-abl tyrosine kinase in the presence of a serine protein kinase Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) (14). Following administration of genotoxic drugs, checkpoint kinases Chk2 and Chk1, which are downstream genes in the ATM pathway, modulate p73 activation via the E2F1 transcription factor (2),(18). Chk2 is also capable of direct p73 phosphorylation, thereby enhancing the apoptotic pathway. Another mechanism that has been suggested for p73 activation during cisplatin treatment is the nuclear collection of the IKK-α protein, ultimately leading to apoptosis. As a result of DNA damage, different stress activated mechanisms including JNK/SAPK as well as p38MAPK are involved in p73 regulation (9).

The p73 upregulation via the JNK pathway is modulated through the c-jun transcription factor, which promotes p73 stabilisation by inhibiting proteasome-mediated p73 degradation. Following cisplatin treatment, JNK is capable of direct TAp73 phosphorylation, stabilising TAp73 with a proapoptotic effect (20).

The p38 protein also facilitates p73 activation and stabilisation via c-abl protein. This process involves direct p73 phosphorylation (20). Another mechanism of p73 modulation involves isomerisation changes induced by Pin-1, which increases p73 acetylation leading to p73 stabilisation/following DNA damage. YAP protein has an important role in p73 stabilising following DNA damage, thus enhancing p73-dependent apoptosis. p73 acetylation is mediated by p300 and enhanced by Yes Associated Protein (YAP). Also, YAP1 competes with ITCH protein (an E3 ubiquitin ligase responsible for p73 breakdown) for p73 binding, thus preventing p73 degradation (21).

The p73 gene interacts with Apoptosis Stimulating Proteins of p53 (ASPP) family members inducing downstream activation of apoptotic genes like PIG3, Bax, and PUMA. Another ASPP family member, iASSP has been found to have oncogenic inhibitory functions (22). Blocking iASSP-TAp73 with the help of a small peptide leads to p73-induced transcription and apoptosis (23). Protein kinase C δ (PKCδ) along with active catalytic fragment Protein Kinase C Catalytic Fragment (PKCCF) also, activates p73 dependent transcription and stabilises p73 protein following DNA damage (18).

In some instances, inhibitory phosphorylation of p73 has been observed with certain proteins like Haematopoietic Cell Kinase (HCK), c-src, Protein Kinase A (PKA), Polo-Like Kinase 1 (Plk-1) as well as CDKs. The effect of these molecules is to directly phosphorylate p73, leading to its inhibition (9).

p73 Protein Degradation

The p73 degradation occurs in a proteasome-dependent manner. The p73 protein undergoes degradation following ubiquitination by several E3 ligases. ITCH protein, which is a HECT family ubiquitin ligase, acts upon both TA and ΔN forms of p73. The NQO1 and UFD2 molecules participate in the proteasomal TAp73 degradation in a ubiquitin independent manner following DNA damage (20). Calcium-dependent protease calpain-1 also leads to proteolytic degradation of p73 (24),(25). The degradation of p73 is isoform-specific. ITCH mediated degradation is restricted to α and β isoforms (9). The TA isoforms undergo stabilisation following DNA damage through downregulation of ITCH. In contrast genotoxic stress destabilises ΔNp73α (26).

p73 in Ageing and Senescence

TAp73 induces BRCA1, MRE11, and RAD50 transcription, which participate in homologous recombination. Experiments on TAp73 null mice showed premature ageing and senescence due to metabolic derangement. The TAp73 promotes ATG5 expression, thus preventing ageing by the maintenance of homeostatic control and regulation of autophagy (13),(27).

The p73 overexpression is associated with the upregulation of a number of DNA repair proteins including DNA PK (11).

p73 and Epithelial-mesenchymal Transformation (EMT)

Abrus Agglutinin (AGG) prevents invasion of tumour cells by Snail protein degradation via p73 dependent pathway in oral cancer cells (28). Also, studies show that deficiency of p73 in pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma promoted an increase in the EMT, driven by TGF-β activation and suppression of SMAD-dependent pathway (7),(29),(30). Restin (a Melanoma Antigen Gene superfamily molecule) prevents EMT and metastasis by regulating tumour metastasis suppressor mir-200a/b in breast cancer cell lines in a p73-dependent pathway (31).

Role of p73 in Angiogenesis

A majority of the studies have concluded that ΔNp73 promotes angiogenesis in tumours; however, the role of TAp73 remains unclear (30),(32). There are two schools of thought:

1. TAp73 has a negative regulatory effect on Hypoxia Inducing Factor 1α (HIF-1α) via the MDM2 degradation pathway with a net antiangiogenic effect (30).
2. As an angiogenesis promoter, TAp73 is stabilised by hypoxia and subsequently leads to the activation of pro-angiogenic targets like VEGF-A. There was a correlation between tumour size and blood vessel density with TAp73 expression in Xenograft models (30).

Conflicting TAp73 behaviour in angiogenesis might be explained either based on temporal effects or the intensity of TAp73 activation. Transient TAp73 overexpression supported angiogenesis while long-term TAp73 induction resulted in antigenic suppression (32).

The majority of studies support a direct association between TAp73 and VEGF-A expression (27). However, a few studies have reported an inverse relationship between TAp73 and VEGF-A (32).

Role of p73 in Oral Cancer

Immunohistochemistry studies, cell line studies, and Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) studies have been conducted in head and neck cancer including oral cancer with a number of utilities including prediction of outcome or survival, targeting the gene for therapeutic purpose, predicting the drug response and/or chemoresistance, as well as understanding the neoplastic process.

p73-induced apoptosis is an important tumour-suppressor mechanism in head and neck cancer. Suppression of p73-induced apoptosis by ΔNp63α was found to be critical to the survival of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines, thus, perpetuating the tumour cells (33).

Faridoni-Laurens et al., demonstrated the p73 expression in the undifferentiated basal cells of the normal oral epithelium and attributed a role for the p73 gene in the maintenance of the undifferentiated cells of the mucosa. An RT-PCR study also suggested an important role for p73 in head and neck tumourigenesis. Yet another RT-PCR study in oral cancer, suggested a dominant oncogenic role for ΔNp73. Reduction in the Δ Np73 levels conferred a small trend of better overall survival status in HNSCC. The TAp73, which has a tumour suppressor function, was also weakly expressed but appeared to be functionally irrelevant (34).

An immunohistochemical study by Chen et al., suggested that p73 expression in buccal carcinomas may represent an initial event in oral cancer and could be a predictor for oral epithelial dysplasia transformation into frank cancer (34).

A number of anti-cancer drugs primarily function by triggering apoptosis through DNA damage resulting in cytotoxicity. The HNSCC cell lines subjected to cytotoxic drugs like cisplatin, taxol, doxorubicin, and etoposide lead to an increase in the p73 levels triggering apoptosis. Conversely, p73 inhibition by p53 mutants promoted chemoresistance to the anti-cancer drugs in the clinical scenario. Thus, p73 modulates chemosensitivity as well as drug resistance in oral cancer and other tumours. An immunohistochemical study also supported a predictive value for p53 and p73 expression regarding the probability of drug response (33).

p73 IN ANTI-CANCER TREATMENT

Knowledge regarding the molecular structure, various isoforms, and their behaviour in different cellular processes and neoplasms of different sites, has helped evolve various therapeutic strategies.

The p73 gene, like p53, is upregulated at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels by chemotherapeutic agents and ϒ irradiation (7).

The p73 gene has an important role in modulating cellular response in radiotherapy, gamma irradiation, and chemotherapy involving various drugs like cisplatin, bleomycin etoposide, doxorubicin, camptothecin, mitoxantrone, taxol, cytosine analogs like gemcitabine, Ara-C and T-ara-C. The overall effect depends on the type of drug as well as the cellular response. Cisplatin activates and stabilises p73 but does not induce p73 mRNA. Doxorubicin and taxol, on the other hand, induce p73 proteins as well as p73 mRNA simultaneously. In contrast, ϒ irradiation promotes p73 protein activity without changing the protein levels or mRNA levels, according to one study (19). Yet another study reported an increased p73 accumulation in response to ϒ irradiation (9).

Specific p73 Targeted Therapies in Cancer

Various pharmacological agents acting through the p73 pathway are summarised in (Table/Fig 1) (7),(9),(17),(20),(23),(25),(35),(36),(37),(38),(39),(40),(41),(42),(43),(44),(45),(46),(47),(48),(49).

Brief Description of p73-related Pharmacological Agents in the Treatment of Various Cancers

1. Nutlins: Nutlins are non-peptide, small molecule, imidazoline compounds that belong to the family of MDM2 inhibitors. Nutlin-3 upregulates TAp73 expression via the E2F pathway, inducing apoptosis. These bind to the p53 pockets of MDM2 and increase p53 activity with nanomolar potency. Nutlins, along with Reactivating p53 and Inducing Tumour Apoptosis (RITA) are capable of displacing the MDM2/EPF1/p73 complex, promoting apoptosis. It may be used in combination with doxorubicin (7),(20),(50).
2. Reactivation of Transcriptional Reporter Activity (RETRA) molecules: RETRA are small molecules that are capable of displacement of p73 from mutant p53/p73 complex, thereby increasing p73 levels and resulting in growth arrest of the tumour cells. It acts selectively in mutant p53-p73 expressing cells (20),(51).
3. B#BPRIMA:B?B PRIMA 1 (AR-246) gets converted to reactive electrophile Methylene Quinuclidine (MQ) and binds at the core domain of mutant p53, leading to refolding of mutant-p53 and restoration of wild-type p53 functions and further interactions with p73 (20),(39).
4. Metformin: Metformin targets Adenosine Monophosphate-activated Protein Kinase (AMPK), augments β-oxidation, and obstructs oxidative phosphorylation, ultimately increasing TAp73β levels (20),(51).
5. Prodigiosin: It acts by direct p73 activation bypassing mutant p53, producing tumour-suppressive effects (39).
6. B#BNSC59984:B?B It is also a promising molecule capable of p73 pathway activation via mutant p53 degradation induced by a ROS-ERK2-MDM2 pathway (39).
7. Forodesine (Immucilin H): A transition-state analog inhibitor of purine nucleoside phosphorylase, it is a highly potent orally active compound. It has been effective in CLL, as well as cutaneous T cell lymphoma and NK cell lymphoma. Forodesine has high antitumour activity in CLL without functional p53 and activates p53-independent mitochondrial apoptosis by induction of p73 and BIM (20).
8. Aurora Kinase (AURK) inhibitors: AURK A overexpression or amplification is a common finding in various epithelial malignancies like head and neck cancer, colon, pancreas, gastric cancers, liver, bladder, and breast cancers. AURK A overexpression is known to cause centrosomal amplification and abnormalities during cell division. It suppresses TAp73 expression in p53 null cancer cells (20),(52),(53).
Small molecule MLN8054, is a novel AURK A inhibitor that induces TAp73β expression in p53-null cells leading to the downstream pro-apoptotic gene activation (20).
9. Retinoids: Retinoids are capable of inhibiting or reversing the oncogenic process in haematologic and other malignancies in head and neck region, breast, skin, and liver as well as premalignant lesions of the oral cavity. Retinoic acid inhibits cell growth and promotes the differentiation of cells by regulating a number of genes, including p73 (7).
10. Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor: Serine threonine kinase mTOR is associated with cell metabolism, growth, senescence, and neoplastic mechanism. mTOR inhibitors are suggested as positive regulators of p73, leading to the stabilisation and accumulation of TAp73 to induce programmed cell death in tumour cells. mTOR inhibitors are observed to be beneficial in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma treatment (7),(20).
11. Celecoxib: A cyclooxygenase inhibitor, it is a positive regulator of TAp73, while it selectively downregulates the expression of ΔNp73 inhibition in tumours like neuroblastoma resulting in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. The mechanism of action is through suppression of the cyclooxygenase pathway. A study reported an association between oral cancer prevention and administration of high dosage celecoxib over 5 years (20),(54).
12. 37AA peptide: It acts by binding with iASPP and disrupting the iASPP-p73 complex, leading to cell death (23).

Conclusion

Considerable progress has been achieved through research regarding p73 function since its discovery. To this date, novel findings are being deciphered regarding the multifaceted p73 gene and its interactions with other genes in the path of tumour development and its control. The ultimate aim in this regard, whether it is the researcher, clinician, diagnostician, or drug developer, is to make available a lasting and affordable cure for the patient, which is still elusive but may well be achieved through concerted and focused efforts.

References

1.
Zhang Y, Sturgis EM, Huang Z, Zafereo ME, Wei Q, Li G. Genetic variants of the p53 and p73 genes jointly increase risk of second primary malignancies in patients after index squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 2012;118(2):485-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Rozenberg JM, Zvereva S, Dalina A, Blatov I, Zubarev I, Luppov D, et al. The p53 family member p73 in the regulation of cell stress response. Biol Direct. 2021;16(1):01-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Kaghad M, Bonnet H, Yang A, Creancier L, Biscan JC, Valent A, et al. Monoallelically expressed gene related to p53 at 1p36, a region frequently deleted in neuroblastoma and other human cancers. Cell. 1997;90(4):809-19. [crossref]
4.
McKeon FD. p63 and p73 in tumor suppression and promotion. Cancer Res Treat. 2004;36(1):06-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
De Laurenzie V, Constanzo A, Barcaroli D, Terrinoni A, Falco M, Annicchiarico- Petruzelli M, et al. Two new p73 splice variants, gamma and delta, with different transcriptional activity. J Exp Med. 1998;188:1763-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Ozaki T, Nakagawara A. p73, a sophisticated p53 family member in the cancer world. Cancer Sci. 2005;96(11):729-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Rufini A, Agostini M, Grespi F, Tomasini R, Sayan BS, Niklison-Chirou MV, et al. p73 in cancer. Genes Cancer. 2011;2(4):491-502. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Inoue K, Fry EA. Alterations of p63 and p73 in human cancers. Subcell Biochem. 2014;85:17-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Vilgelm A, El-Rifai W, Zaika A. Therapeutic prospects for p73 and p63: Rising from the shadow of p53. Drug Resist Updat. 2008;11(4-5):152-63.390. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Costanzo A, Merlo P, Pediconi N, Fulco M, Sartorelli V, Cole PA, et al. DNA damage-dependent acetylation of p73 dictates the selective activation of apoptotic target genes. Mol Cell. 2002;9(1):175-86. [crossref]
11.
Dotsch V, Bernassola F, Coutandin D, Candi E, Melino G. p63 and p73, the ancestors of p53. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2(9):a004887. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Deyoung MP, Ellisen LW. p63 and p73 in human cancer: Defining the network. Oncogene. 2007;26(36):5169-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Nicolai S, Rossi A, Di Daniele N, Melino G, Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli M, Raschellà G. DNA repair and aging: The impact of the p53 family. Aging (Albany NY). 2015;7(12):1050-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Ramadan S, Terrinoni A, Catani MV, Sayan AE, Knight RA, Mueller M, et al. p73 induces apoptosis by different mechanisms. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;331(3):713-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Yoon MK, Ha JH, Lee MS, Chi SW. Structure and apoptotic function of p73. BMB Rep. 2015;48(2):8116. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Taebunpakul P, Sayan BS, Flinterman M, Klanrit P, Gäken J, Odell EW, et al. Apoptin induces apoptosis by changing the equilibrium between the stability of TAp73 and ΔNp73 isoforms through ubiquitin ligase PIR2. Apoptosis. 2012;17(8):762-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Slade N, Horvat A. Targeting p73-a potential approach in cancer treatment. Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17(6):591-602. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Conforti F, Sayan AE, Sreekumar R, Sayan BS. Regulation of p73 activity by post-translational modifications. Cell Death Dis. 2012;3(3):e285433. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Agami R, Blandino G, Oren M, Shaul Y. Interaction of c-Abl and p73α and their collaboration to induce apoptosis. Nature. 1999;399(6738):809-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Bisso A, Collavin L, Del Sal G. p73 as a pharmaceutical target for cancer therapy. Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17(6):578-90. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Candi E, Agostini M, Melino G, Bernassola F. How the TP 53 family proteins TP 63 and TP73 contribute to tumorigenesis: Regulators and effectors. Hum Mutat. 2014;35(6):702-14. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Cai Y, Xiu S, Gao X, Gu S, Liu Z. iASPP inhibits p53-independent apoptosis by inhibiting transcriptional activity of p63/p73 on promoters of proapoptotic genes. Apoptosis. 2012;17(8):777-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Bell HS, Dufes C, O'Prey J, Crighton D, Bergamaschi D, Lu X, et al. A p53-derived apoptotic peptide derepresses p73 to cause tumor regression in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(4):1008-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Ozaki T, Kubo N, Nakagawara A. p73-binding partners and their functional significance. Int J Proteomics. 2010;2010:283863. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Al-Bahlani S, Fraser M, Wong AY, Sayan BS, Bergeron R, Melino G, et al. p73 regulates cisplatin-induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells via a calcium/calpain-dependent mechanism. Oncogene. 2011;30(41):4219-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Rossi M, De Laurenzi V, Munarriz E, Green DR, Liu YC, Vousden KH, et al. The ubiquitin-protein ligase Itch regulates p73 stability. EMBO J. 2005;24(4):836-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Lin YL, Sengupta S, Gurdziel K, Bell GW, Jacks T, Flores ER. p63 and p73 transcriptionally regulate genes involved in DNA repair. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(10):e1000680. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Sinha N, Meher BR, Naik PP, Panda PK, Mukhapadhyay S, Maiti TK, et al. p73 induction by abrus agglutinin facilitates snail ubiquitination to inhibit epithelial to mesenchymal transition in oral cancer. Phytomedicine. 2019;55:179-90. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Javle M, Li Y, Tan D, Dong X, Chang P, Kar S, et al. Biomarkers of TGF-β signaling pathway and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e85942. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Rozenberg JM, Zvereva S, Dalina A, Blatov I, Zubarev I, Luppov D, et al. Dual role of p73 in cancer microenvironment and DNA damage response. Cells. 2021;10(12):3516. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Lu Z, Jiao D, Qiao J, Yang S, Yan M, Cui S, et al. Restin suppressed epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor metastasis in breast cancer cells through upregulating mir-200a/b expression via association with p73. Mol Cancer. 2015;14(1):01-04. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Sabapathy K. p73: A positive or negative regulator of angiogenesis, or both? Mol Cell Biol. 2015;36(6):848-54.63. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Rocco JW, Leong CO, Kuperwasser N, DeYoung MP, Ellisen LW. p63 mediates survival in squamous cell carcinoma by suppression of p73-dependent apoptosis. Cancer Cell. 2006;9(1):45-56. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Rodríguez N, Peláez A, Barderas R, Domínguez G. Clinical implications of the deregulated TP73 isoforms expression in cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2018;20(7):827-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Ramos H, Raimundo L, Saraiva L. p73: From the p53 shadow to a major pharmacological target in anticancer therapy. Pharmacol Res. 2020;162:105245. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Peirce SK, Findley HW. The MDM2 antagonist nutlin-3 sensitizes p53-null neuroblastoma cells to doxorubicin via E2F1 and TAp73. Int J Oncol. 2009;34(5):1395-02. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Ray RM, Bhattacharya S, Johnson LR. Mdm2 inhibition induces apoptosis in p53 deficient human colon cancer cells by activating p73-and E2F1-mediated expression of PUMA and Siva-1. Apoptosis. 2011;16(1):35-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
38.
Kravchenko JE, Ilyinskaya GV, Komarov PG, Agapova LS, Kochetkov DV, Strom E, et al. Small-molecule RETRA suppresses mutant p53-bearing cancer cells through a p73-dependent salvage pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(17):6302-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
39.
Zhang S, Carlsen L, Hernandez Borrero L, Seyhan AA, Tian X, El-Deiry WS. Advanced strategies for therapeutic targeting of wild-type and mutant p53 in cancer. Biomolecules. 2022;12(4):548. [crossref] [PubMed]
40.
Saha MN, Jiang H, Yang Y, Reece D, Chang H. PRIMA-1Met/APR-246 displays high antitumor activity in multiple myeloma by induction of p73 and Noxa. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(11):2331-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
41.
Zhang S, Zhou L, Hong B, van den Heuvel AP, Prabhu VV, Warfel NA, et al. Small-molecule NSC59984 restores p53 pathway signaling and antitumor effects against colorectal cancer via p73 activation and degradation of mutant p53. Cancer Res. 2015;75(18):3842-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
42.
Hong B, Prabhu VV, Zhang S, van den Heuvel AP, Dicker DT, Kopelovich L, et al. Prodigiosin rescues deficient p53 signaling and antitumor effects via upregulating p73 and disrupting its interaction with mutant p53. Cancer Res. 2014;74(4):1153-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
43.
Prabhu VV, Hong B, Allen JE, Zhang S, Lulla AR, Dicker DT, et al. Small-molecule prodigiosin restores p53 tumor suppressor activity in chemoresistant colorectal cancer stem cells via c-Jun-mediated ΔNp73 inhibition and p73 activation. Cancer Res. 2016;76(7):1989-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
44.
Yi Y, Zhang W, Yi J, Xiao ZX. Role of p53 family proteins in metformin anti-cancer activities. J Cancer. 2019;10(11):2434.61. [crossref] [PubMed]
45.
Wagner LM, Danks MK. New therapeutic targets for the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma. J Cell Biochem. 2009;107(1):46-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
46.
Wong SW, Tiong KH, Kong WY, Yue YC, Chua CH, Lim JY, et al. Rapamycin synergizes cisplatin sensitivity in basal-like breast cancer cells through up regulation of p73. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;128(2):301-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
47.
Lau LM, Wolter JK, Lau JT, Cheng LS, Smith KM, Hansford LM, et al. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors differentially modulate p73 isoforms in neuroblastoma. Oncogene. 2009;28(19):2024-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
48.
Leong CO, Vidnovic N, DeYoung MP, Sgroi D, Ellisen LW. The p63/p73 network mediates chemosensitivity to cisplatin in a biologically defined subset of primary breast cancers. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(5):1370-80. [crossref] [PubMed]
49.
Kim KC, Jung CS, Choi KH. Overexpression of p73 enhances cisplatin-induced apoptosis in HeLa cells. Arch Pharmacal Res. 2006;29(2):152-58. [crossref] [PubMed]
50.
Essmann F, Schulze-Osthoff K. Translational approaches targeting the p53 pathway for anti-cancer therapy. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;165(2):328-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
52.
Usman S, Jamal A, Teh MT, Waseem A. Major molecular signaling pathways in oral cancer associated with therapeutic resistance. Front Oral Health. 2021;1:603160. [crossref] [PubMed]
52.
Dar AA, Goff LW, Majid S, Berlin J, El-Rifai W. Aurora kinase inhibitors-rising stars in cancer therapeutics? Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9(2):268-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
53.
Mehra R, Serebriiskii IG, Burtness B, Astsaturov I, Golemis EA. Aurora kinases in head and neck cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(10):e425-35. [crossref]
54.
Chiang SL, Velmurugan BK, Chung CM, Lin SH, Wang ZH, Hua CH, et al. Preventive effect of celecoxib use against cancer progression and occurrence of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6235. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57670.16677

Date of Submission: May 10, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 25, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jun 27, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? NA
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 19, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jun 15, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 30, 2022 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com