Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 81997

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : ZD06 - ZD09 Full Version

Familial Fibrous Dysplasia in Two Subsequent Generations in a Family


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57612.16641
Indra Gopi, Arvind Muthukrishnan, Jayapriya Ramadurai

1. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Radiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor and Head of Academics, Department of Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Radiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Oral Medicine and Radiology Specialist, Department of Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Radiology, Private practitioner, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Indra Gopi,
No.162, Poonamalle High Road, Velappanchavadi, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: indragopi26@gmail.com

Abstract

Cherubism also known as familial fibrous dysplasia is a rare, non neoplastic, self-limiting fibro-osseous disorder commonly affecting the jaws in children and young adults. It is also described as familial multilocular cystic disease and familial benign giant cell tumor of the jaw. It is characterised by bilateral, painless swelling involving the mandible giving a cherubic (angel like) appearance. As it is a rare disorder, it is challenging to determine the disease frequency. A familial disorder like cherubism is more likely to be of autosomal dominant trait and shows 100% male sex predilection compared to female which is 50-70%. Although cherubism becomes noticeable in childhood (2-7 years of age), the treatment is however contentious as the disorder is believed to regress gradually after the onset of puberty and surgical intervention is to be decided based on aesthetics or functional difficulties. Numerous researches have been conducted to prove that cherubism is a genetically mediated disorder and the chromosome mapped is 4q16.3. This paper describes a case of an 11-year-old girl with cherubism and also encountered in two subsequent generations of a family, the father and his three children. The genetic and pedigree analysis carried out in this family proves hereditary basis in better understanding the genetic association related with the disorder. All the patients were educated about the disorder and were advised for surgical management after the onset of puberty.

Keywords

Benign, Cherubim, Familial multilocular cystic disease, Fibro-osseous lesion, Genetic predisposition

Case Report

An 11-year-old girl reported to the Oral Medicine Department of Saveetha Dental College and Hospital with a complaint of painless bilateral swelling in the lower jaw since the age of 5 years. Initially, the swelling was small and gradually increased over the years. There was no history of pain, difficulty in mastication, toothache, or any discharge from the swelling. The patient was apparently healthy. No treatment was done for the swelling till date. She now reported with concerns of unaesthetic facial appearance.

A. Family history: Patient’s father who was 30 years of age during the time of reporting had similar condition and surgical recontouring of the jaws was done in his childhood. The patient also reported having two siblings - a younger sister and a younger brother of 9 and 7 years respectively, who also had similar condition since childhood. This established familial inheritance pattern of the mandibular swelling in subsequent two generations of the family.

B. Examination: The patient and her two siblings were examined and all three had diffuse swelling present bilaterally in maxilla and mandible, irregular in shape with dull margins extending superioinferiorly from infraorbital margin to the lower border of mandible bilaterally and from the tragus of the ear till the ala of the nose anteroposteriorly on both sides. Nasolabial fold was obliterated bilaterally. The skin over the swelling was normal with no secondary changes, discharge, or pigmentations. The swelling was non tender, hard in consistency, smooth surface with diffused edges and the skin over the swelling was pinchable. Multiple, bilateral, palpable, non tender, and firm submandibular groups of lymph nodes were also evident on palpation (Table/Fig 1).

C. Radiographic examination: Baseline Orthopantomogram (OPG) was advised for the patient and her siblings. All panoramic radiographs uniformly reveal diffuse bilateral multilocular radiolucencies present in maxilla and mandible with a well-defined periphery with cortical bone thinning and bilaterally extending to the condylar and coronoid process (Table/Fig 1).

Multislice Computed Tomography (CT) showed a diffuse, bilateral, multilocular hypodense area with wispy septae and cortical bone expansion in the maxilla and mandible in the axial view. The coronal view showed condyle, coronoid, and ramus destruction, and the 3D reconstructed image showed the extent of the osteolytic lesion (Table/Fig 1).

D. Genetic mutation analysis: Current literature states 80% of affected individuals with cherubism have a mutation in exon 9 of the SH3BP2 gene. Genetic analysis was performed from the collected blood samples of the patient, her parents, and her two siblings.

? Primer: Sense 5’-AAATGGTCCTGCCTTCCTCT-3’
Antisense 5'- GAG GCT GAC GGT GTC AGT
? Amplification Conditions: Initial denaturation- 94oC for 2 min

Amplified - 35 cycles of 94oC for 30 sec followed by a final extension at 72oC for 10 min (1).

The result showed the Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) sequencing of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification product of exon 9 indicated a heterozygous point mutation. Alteration in only a single base pair from alanine to glycine was seen (Table/Fig 2). A genogram was designed based on family history and genetic information. Family history revealed the patient’s grandfather (generation I) presented with cherubism followed by the patient’s father (generation II) who has 25% of the penetrance of the disease and all the three children (generation III) has 100% penetrance of the disease (Table/Fig 2).

As the patients reported in this paper were young and had not attained skeletal maturity, surgical treatment was not advised. However, the patients were reassured, educated about the disorder, the familial preponderance and were advised to undergo surgical contouring and aesthetic corrections after attaining skeletal growth.

Discussion

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), cherubism belongs to a group of non neoplastic bone lesions that affect only the jaws (2). Globally, many terms have been coined for cherubism, such as familial multilocular cystic disease and familial benign giant cell tumor of the jaw. As cherubism is considered a part of family of fibrous-osseous diseases, some authors even refer to this disorder as “familial fibrous dysplasia”. In 1933, William A. Jones of Ontario first recognised multilocular cystic jaw disease in a Jewish-Russian family of three affected family members. The nomenclature of the term "cherubism" comes from the word "cherub" who means sweet, innocent baby or little angel, showing a perfect round cheek with eyes facing up exactly giving an angelic look by capturing the clinical features of the child's disease precisely (3).

The first signs of disease symptoms are generally observed about 2 years of age, then the growth accelerates at 8-9 years of age and spontaneously ceases shortly after puberty. However, the clinical or radiological features of cherubism are not apparent until 14-36 months of age (4). On radiographs, cherubim are a bilateral, expansive, multilocular, radiolucent lesion clearly separated by the cortical bone of the mandible. Radiologically cherubism is like hereditary craniofacial fibrous dysplasia, a subtype of fibrous dysplasia. To date, hereditary tooth germ changes have been identified in 80% of the cherubism population. Mutation occurs in the gene encoding SH3 binding protein 2 (SH3BP2) and is mapped to chromosomal region 4q16.3 (5). Cherubism is a rare hereditary autosomal dominant benign disorder of childhood. The name was derived from the cherubs of Renaissance art which showed similar full round cheeks and the eyes gazing upwards giving the children and young adults peculiarly grotesque, or cherubic appearance. Cherubism is also referred to as familial fibrous dysplasia of the jaws, but the recent gene mapping has proven it to be a separate entity at the molecular level (6). Literature states that the cherubism cases reported as of 2017 were estimated to be approximately 300 in number. Because of its rarity in existence, it is difficult to determine a disease frequency for this disorder. However, the extragnathic skeletal involvement is rare in cherubism. In 1983, Davis GB et al., reported some rare occurrences of multiloculated cystic lesions in other bones, namely, anterior ribs, upper humerus, and upper femoral necks (10).

The symmetrical appearance with multilocular, expansile, radiolucent lesions present in the mandible and/or maxilla typically appears at the age of 2-7 years. In the early stages of the disease, the swelling of the submandibular lymph nodes can contribute to the fullness of the face (7) which can be appreciated in present case as well. The characteristic eyes tilted upwards appearance exposing the sclera below the iris can be caused by the soft fibrous dysplastic tissue in the lesions which infiltrates the orbital floor on expansion. Because of the orbital floor involvement, the associated inferior and lateral recti muscles and the intraconal space of the orbits may also get involved. If the lesion extends up to the orbit, rarely there can be a loss of eyesight due to the optic nerve atrophy (7). However, in this case, there was no “eyes raised towards heaven” appearance.

The condition clinically presents with the child having normal appearance at birth and the orofacial signs and symptoms slowly begin during the 2nd or 3rd year of life. A classic bilateral, symmetrical deformity of the face due to multiple cystic lesions involving both the right and left mandible is the main diagnostic criterion. It is believed that the disease progresses until the onset of puberty and shows gradual regression in adulthood. Solitary lesions or some varying degree of deformity might persist into adulthood, and a few aggressive versions of cherubism have also been described in the literature (8).

In 1978, D.G. Arnott suggested a grading system for cherubism depending on location and the severity of involvement of jaws (9). Based on Arnott’s grading system, Ramon and Engelberg proposed a grading system for cherubism based on the extent of the involvement during the time of evaluation as:

? Grade 1 - Involvement of both mandibular ascending rami
? Grade 2 - Same as grade 1 plus involvement of both maxillary tuberosities
? Grade 3 - Massive involvement of whole maxilla and mandible, except the condylar processes
? Grade 4 - Same as grade 3 with the involvement of the floor of the orbits causing orbital compression (10).

Based on the classical grading system, which is followed worldwide, the entire family in this case series fits in the grade 2 cherubism category where there is involvement of mandibular ascending rami and involvement of maxillary tuberosities bilaterally.

Radiographically, cherubism is characterised by bilateral, expansive, multilocular, radiolucent lesions clearly delimited by cortical bone expansion in the mandible as seen in our patients (11). Alterations of the bone tend to begin in the mandibular angle extending to the ascending ramus of the mandible and may sometimes involve the body of the mandible, which at times can displace the mandibular canal, and even in some cases involvement of the coronoid process is evident. The complete involvement of the maxilla is less frequent and less extensive. In severe cases, orbital bone infiltration can occur leading to exacerbated exophthalmos which can limit the ocular movements. Multiple retained deciduous teeth are commonly seen along with hanging and/or floating teeth, also known as floating tooth syndrome. Our patient’s first sibling, the younger sister, presented with floating teeth which were clear in the OPG. CT scan is the primarily employed imaging technique essential for establishing a diagnosis and for an adequate course of action. Keeping this in mind, we advised our patient for a CT scan, and the results have proven to show the extent of the osteolytic lesion in the 3D reconstructed image. It aids in identifying the extent of bone involvement. Dental anomalies such as delayed eruption, displacement of teeth, root resorption, are also known to be present (11).

Cherubism with multiple familial presentation had reported mutations in the exon 9 of the SH3 binding protein 2 (SH3BP2) genes on chromosome region 4q16.3. The molecular pathogenesis is based on the interaction between disrupted Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein (PTHrP) receptors (due to mutations in SH3BP2) and the activity of the Homeobox protein MSX-1. Therefore, the temporal and spatial termination of clinical manifestations is explained by SH3BP2-dependent signaling pathways that impede jaw morphogenesis. During the odontogenesis of the 2nd and 3rd molar in cap stage, there is no spatial compartmentation which is necessary for normal development, leading to cause dysregulation of mesenchymal bone formation and thus to the development of formation of giant cells granulomas which contains osteoclasts (12). The result of the gene analysis of our patient showed the heterozygous point mutation only in a single base pair, from alanine to glycine. As there is no evidence in the literature of the disease causing mutation outside exon 9 in the SH3BP2 gene which highlights the specificity in the diagnosis of the disease (12).

Diagnosis of cherubism is primarily based on factors such as age, family history, radiographic findings, biochemical analysis, and molecular analysis. However, recent advances have shown that the risk of developing cherubism during pregnancy can be detected by DNA analysis that is performed on fetal cells obtained either via amniocentesis which is usually done during the 15-18 weeks of gestation or via chorionic villous biopsy which is done about 10-12 weeks of pregnancy. Studies have shown that the SH3BP2 mutation that causes the disease can be detected by pre-implantation genetic testing available to families with or suspected of having cherubism (13).

The differential diagnoses for cherubism are fibrous dysplasia, Ramon syndrome, Noonan syndrome, fragile X syndrome (Martin-Bell syndrome), and giant cell granuloma (14).

Treatment for cherubism is contentious and not standardized. Because it is a self-limited disease, invasive treatment should be postponed until complete skeletal maturity is completed. Surgery is not recommended for patients with grade I and II cherubism, but biopsy and surgical treatment can be given if tissue dilation causes problems with the airway or masticatory capacity. Surgical managements can vary from a simple impacted teeth extraction to more aggressive resection of the lesion. Evaluating the extent and severity of the disease prior to the surgical intervention. It should be performed meticulously to assess the areas of bone weakness in order to avoid any bone fractures or infections. Calcitonin therapy has been proven to be effective in remission of lesions and is administered as an intranasal spray instead of a subcutaneous injection. The reason for administering calcitonin is that it inhibits giant cell osteoclastic activity (15).

Conclusion

This paper presents cherubism in two generations of a single family establishing the familial pattern of inheritance. Performing the genetic sequencing can be a helpful tool in educating the patient on disease progression and severity.

Acknowledgement

The authors of this article would like to thank the patient and her family members and Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai. Patients have been informed and consent was obtained. The anonymity of patient and her siblings would be duly maintained.

References

1.
Li CY, Yu SF. A novel mutation in the SH3BP2 gene causes cherubism: Case report. BMC Med Genet. 2006;7:84. Doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-7-84. PMID: 17147794; PMCID: PMC1764878. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Pindborg JJ. Histological typing of odontogenic tumours, jaw cysts, and allied lesions. International histological classification of tumors. 1971;1-44. https://www.worldcat.org/title/histological-typing-of-odontogenic-tumours-jaw-cysts-and-allied- lesions/oclc/644589192?referer=di&ht=edition.
3.
Deshmukh R, Joshi S, Deo PN. Nonfamilial cherubism: A case report and review of literature. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017;21(1):181. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Papadaki ME, Lietman SA, Levine MA, Olsen BR, Kaban LB, Reichenberger EJ. Cherubism: Best clinical practice. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7(Suppl 1):S6. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Lima G de MG, Almeida JD, Cabral LAG. Cherubim: Clinic radiographic features and treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2010;1(2):e2. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Ghawsi S, Schwartz K, Korsgaard N, Thorn JJ. Non-Familial Cherubism: A rare case report with long-term clinical and radiological follow-up. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology. 2022;34(2):195-99. [crossref]
7.
Mirmohammadsadeghi A, Eshraghi B, Shahsanaei A, Assari R. Cherubism: Report of three cases and literature review. Orbit. 2015;34(1):33-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Koch BL. Cherubism. Last updated 10.08. 2016. [Cited 2017 Mar 28].
9.
Mahmuda A. A Rare Case of Grade III Cherubisms. Vol. 1, jdoh. 2019. p. 1-5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17303/jdoh.2019.6.201. https://www.surgeryresearchjournal.com/open-access/a-rare-case-of-grade-iii-cherubism-4853.pdf. [crossref]
10.
Surej Kumar LK, Deepa DS, Dilna S. Ramon Syndrome- A Rare Form of Cherubism. Ann Maxillae Surg. 2019;9(2):415-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Ali IK, Karjodkar FR, Sansare K, Salve P, Dora AC. Non-Familial Cherubism with Bilateral Maxilla and Mandible Involvement - Clinic radiographic Findings. Cureus. 2016;8(7):e709. [crossref]
12.
Chrcanovic BR, Guimarães LM, Gomes CC, Gomez RS. Cherubism: A systematic literature review of clinical and molecular aspects. Int J Oral maxillae Surg. 2021;50(1):43-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Machado RA, Pontes HAR, Pires FR, Silveira HM, Bufalino A, Carlos R, et al. Clinical and genetic analysis of patients with cherubism. Oral Dis. 2017;23(8):1109-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Ahmad M, Gaalaas L. Fibro-Osseous and Other Lesions of Bone in the Jaws. Radiol Clin North Am. 2018;56(1):91-04. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Zoe N, Antigoni S, Christodoulos L, Albaghal Y, Zervides C, Ilana K. Cherubism treated with intranasal calcitonin: A case report and literature review. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases. 2021;7(3):100225. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57612.16641

Date of Submission: May 07, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 24, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jun 08, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 11, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jun 02, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 28, 2022 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com