Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 48869

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : ZC12 - ZC15 Full Version

Rose Bengal Staining, Microbiopsy and Scalpel Biopsy as a Cytology-cum-Histopathology based Diagnostic Scheme for Oral Dysplasias- A Pilot Study


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/55185.16584
Shilpa Dutta Malik, Upender Malik, MK Sunil

1. Associate Professor, Department of Oral Pathology, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Professor, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College, Moradabad, Utter Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shilpa Dutta Malik,
Delhi Road, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: jbnjmd@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Most Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) is preceded by Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMDS). These disorders if diagnosed early can be prevented from converting into full blown malignancies. This points towards an ever increasing need for a more accurate, less invasive diagnostic tool to detect these lesions early.

Aim: To analyse and compare the accuracy of 1% Rose Bengal (RB) dye and oral microbiopsies (using dermatologic ring curettes) with conventional scalpel biopsy in diagnosing oral epithelial dysplasias.

Materials and Methods: This crosssectional pilot study, included a total number of 26 male patients, 40-60 years old, with oral white and red mucosal lesions attending the Outpatient Department (OPD) of Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. Thorough clinical examination, 1% RB staining, microbiopsy, and scalpel biopsy was performed on all included participants. Parameters assessed included clinical signs indicative of dysplasia in red and white lesions such as increase thickness, nodularity, atrophic mucosa, erosion,ulcers and change in colour of mucosa with positive history of tobacco smoking. Hyperchromatic areas owing to increase stain intake (due to increased nuclear cytoplasmic ratio) were obtained after staning with RB dye and histopathological indicators of epithelial dysplasia (cellular and architectural changes) were observed after both microbiopsy and scalpel biopsy. Chi-square test was done to compare results of 1% RB staining and microbiopsies with scalpel biopsies.

Results: Total 26 male patients were included with a mean age of 50 years. There was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of microbiopsies (p=0.913) and 1% RB dye (p=0.393) as compared to conventional scalpel biopsy in delineating the epithelial dysplastic changes associated with OPMDS.

Conclusion: Oral microbiopsy, is a relatively novel, accurate, and less invasive diagnostic tool. It has proved to be as effective as scalpel biopsy in diagnosing and grading epithelial dysplasia. Through this article, it was proposed that 1% RB staining, microbiopsy, and scalpel biopsy can be used in conjugation as a part of cytology-cum-histopathology based diagnostic scheme for oral clinically suspicious lesions.

Keywords

First line diagnosis, Live staining, Oral cancer, Potentially malignant disorders

The OSCC accounts for 94% of all oral malignancies and is amongst top the ten most frequent malignant neoplasms affecting mankind (1). In India, OSCC is amongst the top three cancer types (2). and India has been regarded as a global epicenter killing about million patients per year. OSCC has a considerably high incidence, and its associated morbidity and mortality has driven scientists globally to devise methods for its early diagnosis (3).

About 80% of OSCC patients are reported to be preceded by OPMDS (4). Nevertheless, it has been documented that the malignant transformation for OPMDS is below 18% (5). Contrastingly, most of OSCCs which are preceded with OPMDS may not appear clinically suspicious on routine oral examination. Diagnostic delay in these lesions can be countered if a robust and effective diagnostic test to rule out if epithelial dysplasia or carcinoma is present (6).

The distinguishing feature between cancer cells and somatic cells is their capacity to multiply (7). However, the quantum of cellular alterations in OPMDS and their sequel varies. These cellular level alterations may not match with the clinical oral presentation of the lesion. A lot of diagnostic dilemmas in the context of oral epithelial dysplasia associated with OPMDS and OSCCs exists as OPMDS are highly heterogeneous in appearance and may resemble a number of benign or reactive conditions. Hence, many sensitive and predictive techniques along with incisional biopsy have been introduced for the detection of intercellular and intracellular alterations present in oral epithelial dysplasia. Incisional biopsy has been considered as the golden standard diagnostic technique for oral mucosal lesions (8). However scientific world in the interest of public oral health is always in search of accurate, less invasive diagnostic tools for early detection of changes occurring at both microscopic and macroscopic levels. Many diagnostic techniques can be used in conjugation or as an adjunct to incisional biopsy for screening or improving the efficacy and accuracy of diagnosis. These diagnostic techniques include live staining methods like 1% RB staining. and novel innovative cytological-cum-histological technique like microbiopsies. in the diagnosis of OPMD. These techniques are minimally invasive and can be performed by general practitioner without much of expertise having comparable accuracy and can also be performed in patients where an incisional biopsy is contraindicated i.e; in the case of medically compromised patients, including those with severe or poorly controlled systemic diseases such as coronary artery disease, renal or hepatic impairment, and various endocrinopathies and immune-compromised states, other vascular abnormaliites,or apprehensive patients which are hesitant to undergo incisional biopsy (8).

Thus the present study was designed to analyse and compare the accuracy of vital staining (using 1% RB dye) and oral microbiopsy (using dermatologic ring curettes) with conventional scalpel biopsy diagnosing oral epithelial dysplasias. Null hypothesis was that there is no difference between the efficacy of the vital staining and microbiopsy in early detection of oral cancer.

Material and Methods

The present cross-sectional pilot study was performed on a small population, to check the efficacy of microbiopsy and rose Bengal vital staining, in delineating the epithelial changes. After obtaining ethical approval based on the Helsinki Declaration, patient written consent, the cross-sectional pilot study was performed on 26 male patients who attented the OPD of Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. Duration of the study was over the period of 6 months, from December 2014-June 2015.

Inclusion criteria: All the participants who had a provisional clinical diagnosis of oral white and red mucosal lesions with a positive history of tobacco chewing and/ or smoking were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Subjects with any known allergy to RB dye or a history of systemic conditions like bleeding disorders were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Parameters assessed were the clinical indicators of dysplasia ( ulcers, nodularity,erosion, increase thickness and change in color of mucosa with positive history of tobacco smoking) hyperchromatic areas (which indicates increased nuclear cytoplasmic ratio) obtained after staning with RB dye and histopathological indicators of epithelial dysplasia (cellular and architectural changes) (12). Observed after both microbiopsy and scalpel biopsy.

Each patient enrolled in the study was subjected to the following Clinical Procedures (CP):

CP 1: Thorough intraoral clinical examination for the location of the most representative mucosal site for the white and red lesions (Table/Fig 1).

CP 2: Vital staining using 1% RB dye (Table/Fig 2): Patients were made to rinse their mouth using distilled water for one minute, followed by application of RB solution (using 1% RB dye which was prepared using 1 gm of RB powder in 100 mL of distilled water) for two minutes over the site assessed clinically. Patients were asked to rinse their mouth for one minute with distilled water to remove excess RB dye solution. Intraoral examination of the lesional area stained was carried out, and the intensity of the staining was evaluated visually as mild, moderate, intense, and negative (9).

CP 3: Oral microbiopsy using dermatological ring curettes at the same site (Table/Fig 3): Microbiopsy using dermatological ring curette with a 3 mm diameter of the intensely stained region by scrapping the lesional area gently by the sharp edge of the curette to obtain pinpoint mucosal bleeding to ensure that basal layer had been sampled. Multiple fragments of tissues thus available were routinely processed, embedded, and sectioned for routine Haematoxylin and Eosin (H and E) staining (Table/Fig 4)a. The sections were coded randomly and observed under a light microscope. The epithelial dysplasia was graded using criteria given by Banoczy and Csiba (12).

CP 4: Conventional scalpel biopsy at the same site: Scalpel biopsies were then performed from the stained area of RB dye under local anesthesia infiltration with adrenaline and were processed for regular H and E staining (Table/Fig 4)b. The observer was blinded to the result of vital staining and scalpel biopsy.

Statistical Analysis

Chi-square test was done to compare results of 1% RB staining and microbiopsies with scalpel biopsies. The frequency and percentage were calculated for the descriptive statistics and the chi-square test with Yates correction was used for the inferential statistics using Statistical Package of the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21. Level of significance for the present study is 5%.

Results

Of all the 26 cases included in the study, 40-60 years old male patients, with mean age was 50 years, 24 were diagnosed with hyperkeratosis and epithelial dysplasia (mild, moderate & severe) on scalpel biopsy, 22 cases and 20 cases showed similar results on microbiopsy and vital staining respectively. The specificity and sensitivity of the RB stain and microbiopsy using dermatological ring curette was calculated as compared to scalpel biopsy and it was observed that microbiopsy was 90.91% sensitive and RB stain was 83.33% sensitive while RB stain showed more specificity ie 100% and specificity of microbiopsy was found to be 50% (Table/Fig 5).

The diagnostic accuracy was also compared and it was observed that both the techniques (RB stain and microbiopsy) were equally efficient in diagnosing OPMDS . On comparing vital staining with scalpel biopsy using the chi-square test the p-value was non significant (p=0.393) as shown in (Table/Fig 6). While comparing microbiopsy with scalpel biopsy using the chi-square test, the p-value was non significant (p=0.913) as shown in (Table/Fig 7). Both the procedures i.e. vital staining using 1% RB dye and scalpel biopsy were equally efficient in diagnosing dysplasia.

Discussion

The outcomes of the present study has proved that both the techniques i.e. vital staining and microbiopsy using dermatological ring curette were equally effective in diagnosing oral epithelial dysplasias, hence, the null hypothesis was accepted. The results of this study were in accordance with Mittal N et al., and Du G-F et al., who proved the efficacy of rose bangal dye in eraly detection of OPMDS (9),(10). In present study, 1% RB staining, microbiopsies, and scalpal biopsies were performed concomitantly on the same lesion, so that there was no time lapse or positional alterations.

In the Indian scenario, it has been reported in the oral cancer context that the male to female ratio in the urban population is 2:1 and the rural population 5:1 (13). More incidence of OSCCs can be attributed to the fact that higher rates of smokers are found amongst the Indian male population (30%) as compared to the female population (3%) (14). The current study was able to enroll only male patients. This biased sample enrolled can be due to two reasons. Firstly, higher rates of smokers are found among the male population in India. and secondly because only male patients with white and red mucosal lesions gave a history of smoking as females must have been hesitant to give the same history dues to social reasons (14).

Though scalpel biopsy is considered as the golden standard diagnostic technique for definitive diagnosis of OMPDS and OSCCs (8). However biopsy itself carries many technical problems. Pentenero M have compiled the following pitfalls: (8). Surgical skills and training required by dentist to perform a biopsy; to choose between incision or excisional type of biopsy; site selection of biopsy; and problems in histopathological interpretation. To overcome these problems, non technique sensitive, non invasive, robust, reliable, painless, budget-friendly, and repeatable techniques are required for screening and as an adjunct to scalpal biopsy (8). To counter these problems, vital staining, cytological staining,

RB (i.e. 4,5,6,7-tetrachloro-2,4,5,7-tetraiododerivative of fluorescein) has been suggested as a marker for alterations in ocular surface physiology (15),(16). RB staining has shown better results than toluidine blue in diagnosing OPMDS (10). hence it was the choice of vital stain to be tested in present study. Moreover, in the detection of OPMDS, various studies on RB stainings have found sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy to be 90% and 93.9% (9),(10). Present study also showed similar results as the specificity and sensitivity was found to be 83.33% and 100% respectively.

Conventional oral diagnostic cytology has flaws of giving false negative results and inadequate sample cells/depth. Microbiopsy is comparatively advantageous since it is a cytology-cum-histopathology based diagnostic method (8). Most of the microbiopsies taken in the present study were under infiltrative local anesthesia since it was a relatively less painless procedure as compared to scalpel biopsy. Moreover, the lesion did not bleed much so was easily manageable and did not require suturing unlike the case of scalpal biopsy. Microbiopsies have been positively tested for deriving the first-level diagnosis of oral lesions (8),(11). A previous study comparing microbiopsy with incisional biopsy has found high sensitivity (97.65%) of microbiopsy (17). These results are in line with our results which demonstrated that sensitivity of microbiopsy was 90.91%. Deliberately results of vital staining with microbiopsy were not compared, since both are unrelated techniques. 1% RB staining is more of a chair side procedure, whereas microbiopsy is a cytology-cum-histopathology based diagnostic method.

Limitation(s)

The limitations of the present study were obvious, i.e. small sample size and male biased sample. The current study is a pilot sample based study and should be attempted with a larger sample. Evenly distributed gender based samples should be attempted for knowing sex based comparisons of diagnostic challenges in dysplasia associated with OPMDS and OSCCs.

Conclusion

The results of the present study showed that both the procedures, i.e., vital staining using 1% RB dye and microbiopsies are very effective in delineating the dysplastic changes associated with OPMDS and OSCCs. The diagnostic accuracy of rose Bengal dye and microbiopsy obtained to be 84.62% in the present study. The present study points that oral microbiopsy is as effective in diagnosing dysplasia as scalpel biopsy. However, studies with a larger sample size are required to further substantiate the results and findings of the pilot study. The present study’s results point that all three (i.e. 1% RB staining, microbiopsy, and scalpel biopsy) can be used in conjugation, as a part of cytology-cum-histopathology based diagnostic scheme for oral clinically suspicious lesions.

References

1.
Mc Namara K, Alzubaidi H, Jackson JK. Cardiovascular disease as a leading cause of death: How are pharmacists getting involved? Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2019;8:1. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
World Health Organization. Cardiovascular Disease Programme, World Health Organization & World Health Organization. Noncommunicable Disease and Mental Health Cluster, Integrated Management of Cardiovascular Risk. (World Health Organization, 2002). 9-12 July 2002. https://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/ media/en/635.pdf.
3.
Dagenais GR, Leong DP, Rangarajan S, Lanas F, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Gupta R, et al. Variations in common diseases, hospital admissions, and deaths in middle-aged adults in 21 countries from five continents (PURE): A prospective cohort study. The Lancet. 2020;395(10226):785-94. [crossref]
4.
Vaidya A, Pokharel PK, Nagesh S, Karki P, Kumar S, Majhi S. Prevalence of coronary heart disease in the urban adult males of eastern Nepal: A population-based analytical cross-sectional study. Indian Heart J. 2009;61(4):341-47.
5.
Hu X, Sun X, Li Y, Gu Y, Huang M, Wei J, et al. Potential gains in health-adjusted life expectancy from reducing four main non-communicable diseases among Chinese elderly. BMC Geriatrics. 2019;19(1):01-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Klenk J, Rapp K, Büchele G, Keil U, Weiland SK. Increasing life expectancy in Germany: Quantitative contributions from changes in age-and disease-specific mortality. Eur J Public Health. 2007;17(6):587-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Buttar HS, Li T, Ravi N. Prevention of cardiovascular diseases: Role of exercise, dietary interventions, obesity and smoking cessation. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2005;10(4):229.
8.
Mensah GA, Wei GS, Sorlie PD, Fine LJ, Rosenberg Y, Kaufmann PG, et al. Decline in cardiovascular mortality: Possible causes and implications. Circulation Res. 2017;120(2):366-80. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Hajar R. Risk factors for coronary artery disease: Historical perspectives. Heart Views: The Official Journal of the Gulf Heart Association. 2017;18(3):109. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Lehninger AL, Nelson DL, Cox MM, Cox MM. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. Macmillan; 2005.
11.
Henrion J. Hypoxic hepatitis. Liver International. 2012;32(7):1039-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Ndrepepa G, Kastrati A. Alanine aminotransferase- A marker of cardiovascular risk at high and low activity levels. J Lab Precis Med. 2019;4(4):29. [crossref]
13.
Choi KM, Han K, Park S, Chung HS, Kim NH, Yoo HJ, et al. Implication of liver enzymes on incident cardiovascular diseases and mortality: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):01-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Park EO, Bae EJ, Park BH, Chae SW. The associations between liver enzymes and cardiovascular risk factors in adults with mild dyslipidemia. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4):1147. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Kunutsor SK, Apekey TA, Khan H. Liver enzymes and risk of cardiovascular disease in the general population: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Atherosclerosis. 2014;236(1):07-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Lee H, Shin DW, Lee TH, Yang HK, Ahn E, Yoon JM, et al. Association between change in serum aminotransferase and mortality: A nationwide cohort study in Korea. Medicine. 2016;95(12). [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Motamed N, Rabiee B, Poustchi H, Dehestani B, Hemasi GR, Khonsari MR, et al. Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and 10-year risk of cardiovascular diseases. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2017;41(1):31-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Human Kinetics Books. 1988.
19.
Vitros micro slide assay summary. Pub. No. J23323_EN. 2018-07-03. Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Inc 2018. Rochester, New York 14626. https://www.scribd. com/document/458550250/MSAS-J23323-EN. April 27, 2020.
20.
Kim HC, Nam CM, Jee SH, Han KH, Oh DK, Suh I. Normal serum aminotransferase concentration and risk of mortality from liver diseases: Prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2004;328:983. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Arndt V, Brenner H, Rothenbacher D, Zschenderlein B, Fraisse E, Fliedner TM. Elevated liver enzyme activity in construction workers: Prevalence and impact on early retirement and all-cause mortality. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998;71(6):405-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Rehman H, Samad Z, Mishra SR, Merchant AT, Narula JP, Mishra S, et al. Epidemiologic studies targeting primary cardiovascular disease prevention in South Asia. Indian Heart J. 2018;70(5):721-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Adams LA, Anstee QM, Tilg H, Targher G. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and its relationship with cardiovascular disease and other extrahepatic diseases. Gut. 2017;66(6):1138-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Porter SA, Pedley A, Massaro JM, Vasan RS, Hoffmann U, Fox CS. Aminotransferase levels are associated with cardiometabolic risk above and beyond visceral fat and insulin resistance: The Framingham Heart Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(1):139-46. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Kim HC, Kang DR, Nam CM, Hur NW, Shim JS, Jee SH, et al. Elevated serum aminotransferase level as a predictor of intracerebral hemorrhage: Korea medical insurance corporation study. Stroke. 2005;36(8):1642-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Goessling W, Massaro JM, Vasan RS, D’Agostino Sr RB, Ellison RC, Fox CS. Aminotransferase levels and 20-year risk of metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(6):1935-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Schindhelm RK, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Bouter LM, Stehouwer CD, Heine RJ, et al. Alanine aminotransferase predicts coronary heart disease events: A 10-year follow-up of the Hoorn Study. Atherosclerosis. 2007;191(2):391-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Kunutsor SK, Bakker SJ, Kootstra-Ros JE, Gansevoort RT, Gregson J, Dullaart RP. Serum alkaline phosphatase and risk of incident cardiovascular disease: Interrelationship with high sensitivity c-reactive protein. PloS One. 2015;10(7):e0132822. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Tonelli M, Curhan G, Pfeffer M, Sacks F, Thadhani R, Melamed ML, et al. Relation between alkaline phosphatase, serum phosphate, and all-cause or cardiovascular mortality. Circulation. 2009;120(18):1784-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Wannamethee SG, Sattar N, Papcosta O, Lennon L, Whincup PH. Alkaline phosphatase, serum phosphate, and incident cardiovascular disease and total mortality in older men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(5):1070-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Targher G, Bertolini L, Padovani R, Rodella S, Tessari R, Zenari L, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its association with cardiovascular disease among type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(5):1212-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Abramowitz M, Muntner P, Coco M, Southern W, Lotwin I, Hostetter TH et al. Serum alkaline phosphatase and phosphate and risk of mortality and hospitalization. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(6):1064-71. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/55185.16584

Date of Submission: Jan 25, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Feb 28, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Apr 12, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 28, 2022
• Manual Googling: Apr 06, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 18, 2022 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com