Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 104261

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : WC06 - WC11 Full Version

Clinical Pattern of Dermatological Conditions among Paediatric Patients Attending Outpatient Department in a Tertiary Care Centre of Rural Haryana, India


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57904.16634
Rachna Verma, Mahesh Kumar, Usha Kataria, Vishwender Dahiya, Rupinder Kaur

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Bhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Bhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Bhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Bhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India. 5. Senior Resident, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Bhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Mahesh Kumar,
H. No 1934, Sector-3, HUDA, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
E-mail: drmahesh81@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: Skin disorders are common in paediatric age group and are associated with significant morbidity and stress. These differ from adults in clinical presentation, treatment and prognosis. Data on pattern of paediatric dermatoses can be used in planning healthcare programs.

Aim: To study the clinical pattern and prevalence of various skin conditions in paediatric age group in tertiary care centre of rural Haryana, India.

Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional observational study was conducted in Bhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College (W) Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India. A total of 1,003 consecutive Outpatient Department (OPD) patients upto age of 14 years presenting with skin conditions were included in study from a period May 2021 to January 2022. Various parameters like age, gender, pattern of distribution and type of skin lesions were assessed. Results were entered in excel sheet and frequency, percentages were calculated.

Results: Out of 1,003 patients 56.53% were males and 43.47% were females. Maximum number (33.20%) of patients were in the age group of 1-5 years. Scabies (24.12%) was the most reported dermatological condition. Majority of dermatoses belonged to infections (32.40%) and infestations (24.83%) followed by eczemas (17.34%). Bacterial infections (15.25%) were most common infections followed by fungal (10.37%) and viral (6.78%) infections.

Conclusion: In the present study, infections and infestations were most common dermatological conditions. This study provides insight about the pattern of various dermatoses among children in rural setting.

Keywords

Infections, Paediatric dermatology, Scabies

Skin diseases are common in all age groups in both developed and developing nations (1). In comparison to adults children are more susceptible to acquire skin infections because of weak skin barrier, low immunity and poor hygiene. About 30% of patients visiting paediatric OPD are for dermatology related problems (2),(3). Pattern of skin disease in paediatric age group varies from region to region and is affected by ecological factors, socio-economic status, religion and level of literacy (4). The estimated prevalence of paediatric dermatoses in different parts of India has been reported to be 8.7-35% in school based surveys (5). The various studies undertaken in India have shown that the pattern of skin diseases is affected by age group, rural or urban setting and geographical areas (6),(7).

Skin disease in children may be associated with their genetic makeup, socio-economic background, nutritional and immune status. These can be acute or chronic. Though they are rarely lethal; they are associated with significant morbidity and add to psychological stress to the patient and family (8). Most of these conditions are manageable with proper hygiene and treatment (9). There is lack of epidemiological data on paediatric dermatological problems in this region. Thus, the present study was carried out to observe the clinical pattern of paediatric dermatoses in rural Haryana, India. This study will enhance the knowledge of pattern of various skin conditions affecting children of these areas and will provide baseline data for future surveys.

Material and Methods

The present cross-sectional observational study was carried out at Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Bhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College (W) Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India, after due permission from Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) of our institute (BPSGMCW/RC/676/IEC/2021). The study was conducted over a period of nine months from May 2021 to January 2022. Children below the age of 14 years of either sex presenting with skin problems in skin OPD and those referred from paediatric OPD were enrolled in the study.

Inclusion criteria: Patients of age upto 14 years of either sex who provided detailed history, conducted necessary investigations if required and gave consent for participation were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who did not give consent and patients whose primary lesions were altered by the application of topical medication were excluded from the study.

Sample size: Taking expected proportion 0.3 and relative precision at 3% and 95% confidence interval the required sample size came out to be 896 (10).

A total of 1,003 patients were recruited. Informed consent/ assent was taken from the parent/guardian of each patient enrolled in the study after explaining in local language. Data was collected from patients/informant and entered in a proforma. The presenting complaint was registered as the main diagnosis. Patients already enrolled, who presented in OPD for some other skin condition later on were excluded to prevent duplicate entries. Diagnosis was based on detail review of history including family history, clinical features, general and cutaneous examination. Wherever necessary relevant investigations such as Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) mount, Gram’s stain, skin biopsy were carried out to help in diagnosis.
Statistical Analysis

The details of patients were entered in Microsoft excel 7 and frequency, percentages and mean of variables were calculated.

Results

A total of 1,003 patients were recruited in the study. About 56.53% (567) were males and 43.47% (436) were females. Males to female ratio was 1.3:1. The mean age of study population was 6.58 years. Maximum number (33.20%, N=333) of patients were in the age group of 1-5 years followed by age group of 6-10 years (30.30%, N=304) and 11-14 years (27.22%, N=273) respectively (Table/Fig 1).

Most of the cases were diagnosed clinically however relevant investigations were required in few cases. KOH mount was done in 17 cases, viral markers in seven cases, skin biopsy in five cases, VDRL in three, bacterial culture in three cases, slit skin smear in one case and ultrasonography and MRI abdomen to exclude disseminated visceral haemangiomatosis in a case of multiple haemangioma.

Most common presenting complaint was itching in 46.75% (N=469) cases. Scabies (24.12%, N=242) was the most reported dermatological condition. The most common group of dermatoses in this study was infection (32.40%, N=325), followed by infestations (24.83%, N=249). Infections and infestations together (57.23%, N=574) formed the largest group. This was followed by eczemas (17.34%, N=174) and hypersensitivity disorders (8.28%, N=83). Disorders of sweat and sebaceous gland constituted 5.28% (N=53) of all cases. Pigmentary disorders and papulosquamous disorders were 2.49% (N=25) and 2.09% (N=21) respectively. Distribution of various group of dermatoses is shown in (Table/Fig 2).

Bacterial infections (15.25%, N=153) were most common infection followed by fungal (10.37%, N=104) and viral (6.78%, N=68). Impetigo (7.27%, N=73) was commonest bacterial infection. Single case of Hansen’s disease was noted (Table/Fig 3). Dermatophyte infections (6.08%, N=61) were the most common fungal infections. Molluscum contagiosum (2.59%, N=26) was most prevalent viral infections. Scabies (24.12%, N=242) was the most common infestation. Pediculosis capitis was noted in seven patients (0.7%) and all were females. Distribution of various infections across various age groups is shown in (Table/Fig 4).

Eczemas constituted 17.34% (N=174) of all patients. Atopic dermatitis (4.08%, N=41) was the most common eczema; maximum cases were observed in age group 1-5 years. Seborrhoeic dermatitis constituted 3.59% cases (Table/Fig 5). In hypersensitivity (8.28%, N=83) reactions, urticaria was the most common hypersensitivity reaction (5.18%, N=52). Majority of urticaria were observed in 11-14 age group while papular urticaria was common in 1-5 years age group. Distribution of various eczemas and hypersensitivity reactions with age wise distribution is shown in (Table/Fig 6).

Disorders of sweat and sebaceous gland constituted 5.28% (N=53). Acne (N=33) and miliaria (N=20) constituted 3.29% and 1.99% respectively. Pigmentary disorders formed 2.49% (N=25) of total patients. Viltiligo was seen in 2.09% patients (N=21) followed by freckles (N=3) and one case of Mongolian spot. Papulosquamous disorders were seen in 2.09% (N=21) of all cases. Six cases each of psoriasis (Table/Fig 7), lichen planus and pityriasis rosea were noted. Hair disorders constituted 1.80% (N=18) and alopecia areata (1.60%, N=16) was the most common hair problem. Distribution of dermatoses related to glands, pigmentary, papulosquamous and hair disorders is shown in (Table/Fig 8).

Nevoid and vascular disorders constituted 1.20% (N=12) which included six cases of haemangiomas, two cases each of melanocytic and halo nevus and one case each of salmon patch and beckers nevus. Disorders of keratinization included two cases of ichthyosis (Table/Fig 9).

Among nutritional disorders (0.4%, N=4) there was one case of phrynoderma, one case of cheilitis and two cases of apthous ulcer. Photodermatoses (0.4%, N=4) included four cases of Polymorphic Light Eruption (PMLE). In vesiculobullous disorders, a single case of epidermolysis bullosa was seen in a newborn (Table/Fig 10).

In Connective tissue disorders one case (0.1%) of linear scleroderma was recorded (Table/Fig 11). Miscellaneous group included eight cases of milia, four cases of fissured sole, three cases of ETN (Erythema Toxicum Neonatorum), three cases of burn and three cases of dry skin. One case each of keratolysis exfoliativa, knuckle pads, perniosis, pyogenic granuloma, skin tag and keloid were noted. Two cases of Smegma pearls were also noted. One case of onychomadesis was also noted. One case of acquired EDV (epidermodysplasia verruciformis) was also documented in a case positive for acquired immunodeficiency virus.

Discussion

Paediatric skin diseases form a major health problem in community. Paediatric skin is different from adult skin and requires special attention. Pattern of dermatological conditions are influenced by various factors such as age, sex, season, socio-economic status, immune status, religion and level of literacy, etc (4). Since paediatric skin diseases act as a mirror to the socio-economic status and hygiene of community their prevalence can be used as a tool to implement health measures relevant for the community. This study was done to observe the pattern of dermatological conditions in paediatric patients. Data can be useful in planning of healthcare programs for children.

A total of 1,003 patients were recruited in the study. 56.53% (567) were males and 43.47% (436) were females. Male patients outnumbered female patients with male to female ratio 1.3:1. Balai M et al., noted male preponderance with male to female ratio of 1.2:1 (11). Reddy VS et al., and Shrestha R et al., reported female preponderance in their studies (12),(13). This can be attributed to the fact that male child is given preference over girl child in many parts of northern India which may lead to higher visits of male children in outpatient department to seek medical services as compared to girl child; which is reflected in present study (14).

Maximum patients were in the age group of 1- 5 years (33.20%), followed by age group of 6-10 years (30.30%) and 11-14 years (27.22%). Karthikeyan K et al., reported maximum number of patients between age group 1-4 years similar to present study (7). The reason for involvement of children of this age group may be due to high vulnerability of children to infections because of low immunity and poor nutritional status (15). This may also be due to increased exposure of preschool and school going children to environmental factors.

The most common group of dermatoses in this study was infection (32.40%), followed by infestations (24.83%). Infections and infestations together accounted for 57.23% of all patients. This observation was consistent with studies done by Karthikeyan K et al., (54.5%), Balai M et al., (40.6%) and Reddy VS et al., (33.8%) (7),(11),(12). This can be due to lack of hygiene, poor sanitation, poor nutritional status, poor level of literacy in the region.

Bacterial infections (15.25%) were most common infection. Impetigo was the commonest bacterial infection (7.27%) as seen by Balai M et al., (11). Maximum cases of impetigo were seen in age group 1-5 years. Pyoderma accounted for 5.68% and folliculitis 1.99% of all patients. Karthikeyan K et al., reported secondary pyoderma to be the commonest infection constituting 17.9% of the total disease burden (7). This may be due to the fact that multiple diagnoses were recorded at the same time in a patient where as in this study presenting complaint was recorded as main diagnosis. As in scabies with secondary infection scabies was recorded as the main diagnosis and secondary complication (pyoderma) was not taken into account separately. Sayal SK et al., reported fungal infection to be commoner than other infections (16). In study done by Wenk C and Itin PH (Switzerlend) and Gul U et al., (Turkey) viral infections were commoner than bacterial and fungal infection (17),(18). This can be explained by difference in geographical, climatic, socio-economic factors, as these countries have better economic conditions and have cold climate whereas India has hot and humid climate which predisposes to infections. One case of Hansen’s disease was recorded (mycobacterial). Though only a single case of polyneuritic (multibacillary) leprosy was recorded; it is still significant. Childhood leprosy (multibacillary) is indicative of ongoing leprosy transmission in community in post elimination phase (19).

Bacterial infections were followed by fungal infections (10.37%). Fungal infections were most common in age group 11-14 years. Amongst fungal infections dermatophyte infections were the most common (6.08%), followed by pityriasis versicolor (3.19%) and candidiasis (0.99%). Tinea corporis was more common in this study while study by Balai et al., Jawade SA et al., found tinea capitis to be the most common fungal infection (11),(20). Sharma NK et al., however reported candidial intertrigo to be most common fungal infection (5). The prevalence of fungal infections can be attributed to the humid climatic conditions in this region during monsoons, overcrowding and sharing of clothes.

Fungal infections were followed by viral infections (6.78%). In viral infections molluscum contagiosum was the commonest (2.59%). Karthikeyan K et al., also reported molluscum contagiosum as the most common viral infection (7). Maximum cases of molluscum contagiosum were seen between age group 6-10 years. MC was followed by warts (1.30%) and viral exanthems (1.20%). Varicella was noted in 1.1% (N=11). Herpes zoster which is very rare in children was seen in three cases. This can be attributed to poor immune status.

Infections were followed by infestations with scabies constituting 24.12% and pediculosis capitis 0.7%. Maximum cases of scabies were noted in 1-5 years of age group. Scabies also constituted the largest individual dermatoses with 24.12% of all the patients in this study. Balai M et al., and Reddy VS et al., also reported scabies as the most common infestation (11),(12). The increase number of infestations may be due to overcrowding, poor living conditions, poor educational status and environmental factors. There was associated history of involvement of family members simultaneously in many cases. Pediculosis capitis was noted in seven patients and all were females. In two school surveys in India done at Himachal Pradesh and Pondicherry pediculosis was the most common infestation (21),(22). The lower incidence in this study may be due to knowledge and availability of over the counter products for lice removal. This study showed high prevalence of infectious dermatoses in children. Similar studies has been presented in (Table/Fig 12) (7),(11),(12),(13),(17).

Second largest group of dermatological conditions were constituted by eczemas with 17.34% of all patients. Karthikeyan K et al., and Reddy BR and Narasimha Rao TV also observed eczema as second most common dermatological manifestation (7),(23). Pawar S et al., reported eczemas and dermatitis as second most prevalent dermatoses with 20.24% of all cases (24). Atopic dermatitis (4.08%) was the commonest eczema with majority cases observed in age group (1-5) years, a finding similar to Pawar S et al., (24). Balai M et al., reported higher rates of eczematous disorders with atopic dermatitis as the most common disorder (11). Sardana K et al., however reported infantile seborrhoeic dermatitis to be more common (25). Seborrhoeic dermatitis constituted 3.59% in this study.

Hypersensitivity disorders constituted 8.28% of all cases. Urticaria was the most common hypersensitivity reaction (5.18%) with majority cases in 11-14 years of age group. Papular urticaria was seen in 1.89% cases with maximum cases in age group of 1-5. Sardana K et al., observed papular urticaria as the most common hypersensitivity disorder followed by urticaria (25).

Disorders of sweat and sebaceous gland constituted 5.28%. This finding was similar to study done by Reddy BR and Narasimha Rao TV in which sweat and sebaceous gland disorders contributed to 5.10% (23). In this study acne (N=33) and miliaria (N=20) constituted 3.29% and 1.99% respectively. Acne was seen mostly in adolescent age group 11-14 as it is a disease of pubertal age group (26). Miliaria was common in 1-5 years age group. Among the pigmentary disorders which formed 2.49% of total patients maximum patients had vitiligo with 2.09% patients (N=25) followed by three case of freckles and one case of Mongolian spot. Reddy BR and Narasimha Rao TV reported pigmentary disorders in 4.9% of study population, with vitiligo as the predominant pigmentary abnormality (23).

Papulosquamous disorders were seen 2.09% of all cases in present study. Six cases each of psoriasis, lichen planus and pityriasis rosea were noted. The incidence of papulosquamous disorders was found to be 2.05% by Reddy V S et al., similar to present study (12). Disorders of keratinisation included two cases of ichthyosis (0.2%, N=2). Hair disorders constituted 1.80% (N=18) and alopecia areata (1.60%, N=16) was the most common hair problem. This was similar to study done by Pawar S et al., where alopecia areata was the commonest hair disorder (24). Among nutritional disorders (0.4%, N=4) there was one case of phrynoderma, one case of cheilitis and two cases of apthous ulcer. In study done by Karthikeyan K et al., nutritional dermatoses were seen in 2.8% cases (7). Photodermatoses (0.4%, N=4) included four cases of PMLE. In vesiculobullous disorders a single case of epidermolysis bullosa was seen in a newborn (0.1%, N=1).

In Connective tissue disorders one case (0.1%) of linear scleroderma was recorded. In study by Reddy VS et al., connective tissue disorders constituted 0.6% of all dermatoses (12). This study gives an idea about the pattern of dermatological conditions in paediatric population of rural Haryana.

Limitation(s)

Limitation of this study was being unicentric and majority of population catered was of rural strata. Seasonal trends could not be studied due to short duration of present study. Multicentric and large studies are required for better understanding of trends in pediatric dermatoses.

Conclusion

This study showed pattern and distribution of dermatological conditions in children from age group 0-14 years in which infections and infestations formed the major disease group followed by eczemas. These are mostly preventable and easily treated. Preventive measures like creating anawareness among children and parents through public health education, improvement of nutrition and socio-economic status will help in reducing burden associated with paediatric dermatoses. This study provided a baseline data about distribution of paediatric dermatoses which was lacking in this region. This study can be used as a reference for future research to determine seasonal variations and role of various intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting the distribution of skin diseases among children.

References

1.
WHOQL Group. Study protocol for the World Health Organisation project to develop a quality of life assessment instrument (WHO-SQOL). Qual Life Res. 1993;2:153-59. [crossref]
2.
Thappa DM. Common skin problems in children. Indian J Pediatr. 2002;69:701-06. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Federman DG, Reid M, Feldman SR, Greenhoe J, Kirsner R. The primary care provider and the care of skin disease: The patient’s perspective. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137(1): 25-29. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Garcia-Romero MT, Lara-Corrales I, Kovark CL, Pope E, Arenas R. Tropical skin disease in children: A review- Part I. Pediatr Dermatol. 2016;33:253-74. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Sharma NK, Garg BK, Goel M. Pattern of skin diseases in urban school children. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1986;52:330-31.
6.
Negi KS, Kandpal SD, Parsad D. Pattern of skin diseases in children in Garhwal region of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Pediatr. 2001;38:77-80.
7.
Karthikeyan K, Thappa DM, Jeevankumar B. Pattern of pediatric dermatoses in a referral center in south India. Indian Pediatr. 2004;41:373-77.
8.
Jain N, Khandpur S. Pediatric dermatoses in India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2010;76:451-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Anthony SF, Infectious Diseases: Considerations for the 21st Century. Clinical Infect Diseases. 2001;32(5):675-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Castelo-Soccio L and McMahon P, “Pediatric dermatology,” Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology. 2017;10:S8-15.
11.
Balai M, Khare AK, Gupta LK, Mittal A, Kuldeep C M. Pattern of pediatric dermatoses in a tertiary care centre of South West Rajasthan. Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57(4):275-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Reddy VS, Anoop T, Kumar A S, Bindurani S, Rajiv S, Bifi J. Study of clinical spectrum of pediatric dermatoses in patients attending a tertiary care centre in North Kerala. Indian J Paediatr Dermatol. 2016;17:267-72. [crossref]
13.
Shrestha R, Shrestha D, Dhakal AK, Shakya A, Shah SC, Shakya H. Spectrum of pediatric dermatoses in tertiary care center in Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J. 2012;14(2):146-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Khichi SK, Dahiya S, Singh NS, Singh A, Mondal A. Preference for male child as a factor for declining sex ratio: A study from Haryana. Saudi Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017;3:582-84.
15.
Katona P, Katona-Apte J. The interaction between nutrition and infection. CID. 2008;46(10): 1582-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Sayal SK, Bal AS, Gupta CM. Pattern of skin diseases in pediatric age group and adolescents. Ind J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1998;64:117-19.
17.
Wenk C, Itin PH. Epidemiology of pediatric dermatology and allergology in the region of Argau, Switzerland. Pediatr Dermatol. 2003;20:482-87. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Gul U, Cakmak SK,Gonul M, Kilic A, Bilgili S. Pediatric skin disorders encountered in a dermatology outpatient clinic in Turkey. Pediatr dermatol. 2008;25(2):277-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Singhal A, Sonthalia S. Leprosy in post-elimination era in India: Difficult journey ahead. Indian J Dermatol. 2013;58(6): 443-46. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Jawade SA, Chugh VS, Gohil SK, Mistry AS, Umrigar DD. A clinico-etiological study of dermatoses in pediatric age group in tertiary health care center in South Gujarat Region. Indian Journal of Dermatology. 2015;60(6):635. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Sharma NL, Sharma RC. Prevalence of dermatologic diseases in school children of a high altitude tribal area of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1990;5:375-76.
22.
Kumar V, Garg BR, Baruah MC. Prevalence of dermatological diseases in school children in a semi urban area in Pondicherry. Indian Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1988; 54: 300-02.
23.
Reddy BR, Narasimha Rao TV. Pattern of dermatoses among pediatric population attending tertiary care. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Res. 2019;6(3):C16-19. [crossref]
24.
Pawar S, Wankhede V, Supekar B, Singh RP. Pattern of pediatric dermatoses and seasonal variations in a tertiary referral center in central India. Iranian Journal of Dermatology. 2019;22(4):145-50.
25.
Sardana K, Mahajan S, Sarkar R. The spectrum of skin disease among Indian children. Pediatr Dermatol. 2009;26:06-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Bhate K, Williams HC, Epidemiology of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(3):474-85. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57904.16634

Date of Submission: May 21, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jun 09, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jun 28, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 24, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jun 24, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 28, 2022 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com