Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 140899

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : UR01 - UR05 Full Version

Difficult Airway Management- A Challenge to Anaesthesiologists


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57084.16607
LK Shivanand, SD Pratibha, Sai Prasad, Divya Shankar, Vidya Patil

1. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, BLDE (Deemed to be University) Shri B M Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, BLDE (Deemed to be University) Shri B M Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur, Karnataka, India. 3. Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, BLDE (Deemed to be University) Shri B M Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur, Karnataka, India. 4. Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, BLDE (Deemed to be University) Shri B M Patil MedicaL College, Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur, Karnataka, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesia, BLDE (Deemed to be University) Shri B M Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. SD Pratibha,
H No-13, Behind KHB Colony, Sadashiv Nagar, Solapur Road, Bijapur,
Karnataka, India.
E-mail: pratibhakaradi@gmail.com

Abstract

Anticipated and unanticipated difficult airway remains an everlasting challenge for anesthesiologist. Most airway problems can be solved with enough resources available but clinical judgment borne of experience, and expertise is crucial in implementing the skills in any difficult airway scenario. Detailed patient history, best utilisation patient protocols, with good clinical assessment may reduce the difficult airway complications. The present series reports six patients with anticipated difficult airway-burn contracture, fractured mandible with restricted mouth, meningo myelocoele (in a neonate, and there was difficulty in positioning for intubation), anterior mediastinal mass (with difficulty in maintenance of anesthesia), cervical spine injury and one patient with left mandible fracture with history of road traffic accident. Different methods were successfully adopted for managing all of these difficult airway cases. Hence planning, preparation, and execution is very important in successful management of difficult airway.

Keywords

Burn contracture, Cervical spine injury, Meningo myelocoele neonate

Management of a difficult airway is one of the most important task for anaesthesiologists which remains most relevant and challenging clinical situation encountered by anaesthesia practitioners as major adverse event can occur if the airway is not secured in a timely situation. Inability to visualise the vocal cords during direct laryngoscopy prevents successful tracheal intubation. Many newer techniques and devices are now available that overcome the problems encountered in intubation of a difficult airway using conventional direct laryngoscopy (1).

For an effective management of anticipated difficult airway one should always have airway plan and airway management strategy which are two key factors in management of difficult airway. Unanticipated difficult airway in contrast to the anticipated difficult airway is more challenging to the anesthesiologist after induction of the general anaesthesia. Encountering an unanticipated difficult airway can be very stressful so it is necessary to be familiar with management algorithm for the unanticipated difficult airway and follow the strategy in such a situation (2).

Series of cases of difficult airway scenarios managed successfully with different techniques and equipment are presented in this case series.

Case Report

Case 1

A 19-year-old male patient, with history of electrical burns eight years back, was posted for contracture release surgery. His mouth opening was restricted and the Mallampatti grade was II. He had a gross restricted neck extension because of burn contracture, reduced temporomandibular joint movement, and decreased mentohyoid distance (Table/Fig 1).

A thorough preanaesthetic examination was done and airway visualised. Airway management was planned with BPL C- Mactintosh of size 3 video laryngoscope. Video laryngoscope was checked before induction. The patient was premeditated with midazolam 0.08 mg/kg, ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg, glycopyrrolate 0.008 mg/kg. Analgesia fentanyl 2 mcg/kg was given. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg after confirming adequate ventilation by proper positioning, neuromuscular blockade was achieved with rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg which is intermediate acting non depolarizing muscle relaxant usually used to facilitate tracheal intubation. Scoline was avoided due to history of burns and instead rocuronium was used which can be safely administered for tracheal intubation. A 7 mm Endotracheal Tube (ETT), accompanying the video laryngoscope,was inserted and advanced into the trachea. The video laryngoscope was removed once the position of the ETT was clinically confirmed by the presence of bilateral air entry and capnography. Maintenance of anesthesia was done with oxygen, nitrous oxide, isoflurane and vecuronium as a muscle relaxant. Blood loss was minimal. The surgeon had performed plastering with a cast, hence extubation of the trachea was challenging with intact airway reflexes after adequate reversal. Fiber optic bronchoscopy-assisted tracheal intubation would have been the best alternative modality to rescue the airway if intubation was not achieved with video laryngoscopy.

Case 2

A 50-year-old male, with history of assault, followed by head injury and loss of consciousness presented with undisplaced fracture of parasymphysis of right side of mandible. He was posted for open reduction and mini plate fixation. The patient had no co-morbidities. On thorough examination of the airway, it was found that cervical spine movement was restricted and was painful. Mouth opening was 1.5 fingers and the Mallampatti grade was IV, overcrowding of teeth was present. After thorough physical examination of the patient and following normal routine investigations, the patient was posted for surgery.

Patient was nil per orally for six hours before surgery and shifted to the operating room. Patient was put in a semi-propped up position and all standard monitors were connected. Nasal decongestant drops were instituted to reduce nasal bleeding, along with a nasal packing of xylocaine 2%. Bilateral superior laryngeal nerve block was given with 2 mL of 2% lignocaine at the greater cornu of the hyoid bone. Transtracheal injection of 2% lignocaine was instilled. Two puffs of 10% lignocaine was sprayed onto the posterior pharyngeal wall before Fiberoptic Bronchoscope (FOB) was inserted. The FOB was checked and a 7 mm Internal Diameter (ID) cuffed ETT was passed over it. The fiberscope was inserted into the right nostril and after passing through the upper airway and the vocal cords, slowly entered through the trachea, and the carina was envisioned. The ETT was then passed over the bronchoscope into the trachea. The passage was confirmed with fiberscope by viewing the tube tip inside the trachea. Anesthesia was then induced with propofol 2 mg/kg and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg and maintained with fentanyl and sevoflurane. The patient vitals were monitored throughout the procedure. The procedure was uneventful. The patient was extubated after adequate reversal.

Case 3

A 10-day-old male neonate visited with a giant occipital meningoencephalocele, and then was scheduled for surgical excision. The neonate was delivered via a normal vaginal delivery in a government hospital. It was a complete term delivery, and the birth weight was 2.7 kg. The baby cried immediately after birth. Cardiovascular and respiratory system examination was normal. The swelling was present since birth and had gradually increased to the size of 6×4 cm, with head circumference of 39 cm. It was diagnosed as a meningomyelocele. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) brain showed a defect of 3.2 cm size in the occipital region through which parenchymal tissue was herniating (Table/Fig 2)a,(Table/Fig 2)b.

The neonate was nil per orally for four hours on the day of surgery and ringer’s lactate was started at the rate of 14 mL/hour. Intubation was planned in supine position. As the meningoencephalocele was bulky, the head was positioned so that the meningoencephalocele does not rupture. A blanket was placed over the body to avoid hypothermia. Baseline parameters were recorded. Electrocardiography (ECG), Non Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP), pulse oximeter, and End tidal carbondioxide (EtCO2) were monitored. Premedication was administered with Inj. glycopyrrolate 0.01 mg i.v, Inj. fentanyl 7 μg. Induction was done with Inj. propofol 6 mg and sevoflurane, and Inj. succinylcholine 7 mg was given for tracheal intubation after confirmation of mask ventilation. The two-hand technique was adopted and the neonate was lifted from the table by two anesthesiologists. One anesthesiologist stabilised the head and shoulders, and the other supported the pelvis, and lower limbs. Laryngoscopy in this position improved visualisation (Cormack-Lehane Grade 2) and intubation was done using 3.0 mm (inner diameter)uncuffed ETT. The intubation was successful at first attempt and fixed at 9 cm after confirming bilateral equal air entry. The baby received Inj. atracurium 1.75 mg as a loading dose. The neonate was put in prone position with extreme caution to avoid accidental extubation. Anaesthesia was maintained using Oxygen (O2) and Nitrous Oxide (N2O) (50:50)+sevoflurane (1-2%), Inj. atracurium 0.5 mg was used as top ups dose. The duration of the surgery was about two and half hours. The intraoperative period was uneventful. Due to excision of large amount of brain tissue and increased duration of surgery decision for elective ventilation was taken. After the procedure, the neonate was shifted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) for further monitoring and ventilation. On the second postoperative day, the baby was extubated. He started accepting regular feeds, and was discharged on 10th postoperative day.

Case 4

A 2-day-old male neonate, weighing 2.4 kgs, was diagnosed with oesophageal atresia and with Tracheo-oesophageal Fistula (TEF). He was posted for right thoracotomy for TEF repair. The baby was delivered via elective lower segment caesarean section and had weak cry immediately after birth. During preoperative assessment neonate was on oxygen supplementation at the rate of 5 litres/min, and on examination patient had stridor and bilateral subcostal retractions. On auscultation, reduced air entry in the right upper lobe was noted with bilateral fine crepitations in all lung fields. An ETT was left in situ in the oesophagus for continuous suctioning. Chest radiography revealed right upper lobe collapse and a mediastinal mass (Table/Fig 3), and on further investigation using Ultrasound scan (USG) it was reported to be anterior mediastinal mass (thymoma). On cardiovascular examination, there were no significant findings. Signs of compression of great vessel were looked for such as oedema of the upper body but second echocardiography revealed anacyanotic heart disease with atrial septal defect having a left to right shunt with dilated right atrium, moderate pulmonary artery hypertension, and a good bi-ventricular function. Airway assessment was done and no significant abnormalities were noted. The only concern was the anterior mediastinal mass which was discovered in the USG chest.

On the day of surgery, the baby was nil per orally for four hours, and was shifted to the operation theater and NIBP, pulse oximeter, Electrocardiograph (ECG) were attached. Fluid administration was started with 0.45% dextrose using a pediatric micro drip set. The neonate was pre-medicated with Inj. atropine and ondansetron. A rigid bronchoscopy was kept standby anticipating difficult airway due to the mediastinal mass. Thorough oral and ETT tube suctioning was done. A soft foam was placed under the shoulder to facilitate laryngoscopy. Inhalational induction with sevoflurane was administered at 3% Monitored Anaesthesia Care (MAC) with Fraction of inspired Oxygen (FiO2) of 60 %. After attaining adequate depth of anesthesia, laryngoscopy was done with Miller blade 0, cords were visualised, and ETT no. 3 was used to attempt intubation. There was difficulty in negotiating the ETT beyond the initial glottic opening as the tube needed to be placed distal to TEF and then pulled back to assure bilateral air entry. On encountering difficulty in passing the ETT, bronchoscope of size 3 was used. Intubation was done and bilateral air entry confirmed. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 1%, O2 at 40%, N2O at 40%, and muscle relaxation was achieved using Inj. atracurium 0.3 mg/kg. The intraoperative period was uneventful and the neonate was transferred to NICU with ETT in-situ.

Case 5

A 45-year-old male, weighing 74 kgs, complained of neck pain and bilateral upper limb paraesthesia, difficulty in swallowing, and change in voice. The patient had pain in the neck since a year, which was progressive in nature, and associated with restricted neck movements. Investigations revealed a chondroma at the level of C2-C3 (Table/Fig 4). He was thus planned for a surgery. During pre anaesthetic evaluation, it was found that he was tobacco chewer since 20 years and had submuscosal fibrosis. On examination, patient had both restricted mouth opening and cervical spine.Mallampatti grading could not be assessed as the mouth opening was restricted while all other airway parameters were within normal limits.

The patient was planned for awake fibreoptic oral intubation. On the day of surgery he was given nebulization with lignocaine 4%. Once the patient was shifted to operation theatre, monitoring using NIBP, pulse oximeter and ECG leads were started and intravenous fluid was 3administered with Ringer lactate at 5 mL/kg. Inj. Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg was started after 10 mins bilateral airway blocks had been administered. After placing a bite block, awake FOB was attempted. Once the fibreoptic scope was advanced beyond the epiglottis evidence of erosion of the posterior pharyngeal wall was seen. After visualising the cords, lignocaine 2% was injected via the side port of fibre optic scope and the ETT no.8 was passed beyond the glottic opening, then anaesthesia was induced with inj. propofol 2 mg/kg and Inj.vecuronium 4 mg was administered. Anesthesia was maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide and isoflurane. The intraoperative period was uneventful.

Case 6

A 25-year-old male, with alleged history of road traffic accident, was diagnosed to have left mandible fracture. He was posted for surgery. On examination, the patient was moderately built and nourished. Respiratory and cardiovascular examinations were normal. Airway examination revealed Mallampatti grade IV with no loose tooth. Mouth opening was one and half fingers. Neck flexion and extension were normal. All other routine investigations were normal. Preoperatively, the patient was nebulized with 4% lignocaine. Nasal packing with lignocaine 2% and adrenaline was done. Mouth gargling was done with lignocaine 2%. He was explained about the procedure in advance and shifted to operation theater. On the operating table, standard monitors including pulse oximetry, ECG and NIBP were connected and baseline vitals were noted. The patient was given airway nerve blocks (translaryngeal and superior laryngeal). Pre medication was done with Inj. ondansetron 4 mg i.v, Inj. glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg i.v and Inj. midasolam 1 mg i.v. As an analgesic Inj. fentanyl 50 μg i.v was given. The patient was awake and cooperative while fiberscope was introduced nasally and advanced into trachea. On visualising vocal cords the flexometallic tube of 7.5 mm size was inserted and after confirmation of tube position using bilaterally equal air entry, the patient was induced with both intravenous and inhalational agent. Surgery lasted for 3 hours with minimal blood loss and no intraoperative complications. At the end of surgery, patient was extubated. In the postoperative period, the patient was stable.

Discussion

A difficult airway can be defined as a “the clinical situation in which a conventionally trained anesthesiologist experiences difficulty with mask ventilation, difficulty with tracheal intubation or both” (3). A difficult endotracheal intubation is defined as “proper insertion of the tracheal tube with conventional laryngoscopy that requires more than 3 attempts or more than 10 minutes” (4).

Sometimes difficult intubation can occur because of anatomical abnormalities or other factors. Anatomical factors indicative of difficult airway include high body mass index, older age, Mallampatti grade III or IV, severely limited jaw protrusion, and thyromental distance of less than 6 cm. Sometimes even these predictors could fail in predicting difficult laryngoscope intubation (2).

A good airway assessment should be undertaken to diagnose the potential for difficult airway for proper patient preparation, proper selection of equipment and proper technique and participation of person experienced in the difficult airway management. On the other hand, determining that the airway is normal avoids time consuming, invasive and potentially more traumatic methods of securing the airway from being adopted. Essential component of good airway assessments are to correctly predict the four pillars of safe airway management which include mask ventilation, laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, placement of supraglottic device, performing a surgical access to the airway. History of surgery, burns, trauma, or tumour in and around the oral cavity, neck, cervical spine pose a potential problem for difficult intubation.

Common causes for anticipated difficult airway may include syndromes such as Pierre-Robin, Treacher Collins, Downs, Klippel-Feil, tumors, trauma and burns with contractures, large goiter, cleft lip and palate, congenital hydrocephalus, meningomyelocele, cystic hygroma, downs syndrome, acromegaly. While unanticipated difficult airway may include infections, abscess, Ludwig’s angina, rheumatoid arthritis, obesity, and acromegaly, TEF. Endotracheal tube guides, different types and sizes of laryngoscope blades, supraglottic airway devices, lighted stylets, rigid video laryngoscopes, and indirect fiber optic laryngoscopes are some options available to circumvent the difficult airway challenges (5). In the present case series, the recent American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) difficult airway guidelines were followed (6).

The use of FOB dates back to 1967, where choledoscope was first used to intubate patients with Stills disease. First case series of the use of fiberoscopes for intubations was published in 1972 (7). Any decision to perform the procedure in an awake versus anaesthetised patient depends on the risk of loosing the airway control. If there is any concern that patient airway cannot be secured, it is safe to have the patient maintain his or her own oxygenation and ventilation. One should not give up on the wakefulness easily. Hence knowledge of FOB functionality and care is paramount to prevent damage and loss of clinical availability. Fiber optic intubation under spontaneous ventilation remains the choice, in anticipated difficult airway. Awake fiber optic intubation has recently gained popularity with good intubating conditions are found in awake patients because they can assist in clearing their own secretions, phonating, or panting (5). A successful FOB is reported in this series, wherean awake intubation was performed in a patient with undisplaced fracture of parasymphysis of mandible, repaired with miniplating. Shaik SI et al., in a case report on anaesthetic management of Ludwig’s angina concluded that awake fiberoptic intubation under topical anesthesia is sophisticated and a less invasive method of securing airway in patients with deep neck infection (8).

Successful videolaryngoscope was performed in a post burn contracture, where the patient had restricted neck movement and reduced mentohyoid distance (9),(10). The authors had performed intubation with video laryngoscope successfully in which patients with post-burn contractures. Pahuja HD et al., reported a patient with a giant oblong occipital meningoencephalocele, in a 1-month-old male neonate. The arrangement for positioning of the neonate for intubation was done by stack of towel blocks. For head support movable blocks were used. So, once the baby was placed on the pillow with the head beyond its edge, each part can be moved as and when required so that the head is supported from all sides with the huge swelling in the depression between the blocks. Each stack could be adjusted as and when required to support the uneven contour of the swelling. This was an innovative approach of positioning such patients with giant meningoencephalocele for intubation in supine position, made according to the availability of resources (11). Such cases need to be well planned before induction, to avoid injury and rupture. Overall, 35-55% of the mediastinal masses in neonates arise from the anterior mediastinum and these masses might originate from the thymus, thyroid,lymphoma or thyroid (12). Symptoms depend on the size of the mass and involvement of the surrounding structures. The anesthesia associated complication in children with anterior mediastinal mass is found to be 9.7-15% (13). Preoperative assessment must involve assessment of the airways and cardiovascular and respiratory compromise due to the mediastinal mass. A detailed anesthesia plan including induction, maintenance, and post-operative management should be done, and this should include the position in which the patient is most comfortable. Symptoms due to respiratory compromise are seen when the lumen of the trachea is narrowed and the presence of stridor in the preoperative period is a good indicator of possible complications during anesthesia. Cardiovascular symptoms are generally not seen in anterior mediastinal mass, but one dreaded complication involving the Cardiovascular System (CVS) is the superior vena cava syndrome (14). Tütüncü AC et al., published a similar report about a 6-month-old baby with massive mediastinal mass, measuring 93×78 mm (cystic lesion) with compression symptoms, who was posted for excision of mass. Induction was done using 4% sevoflurane and remifentanyl infusion was started at 0.05 mc/kg. There were no adverse events during mask ventilation and intubation was done without using neuromuscular blockers. Intubation was successful and anesthesia was maintained using sevoflurane at 2% with air and oxygen mixture (14). Dhiwan S et al., published a case report of a 8-month-old male baby with huge mediastinal mass, who was posted for thoracotomy. The baby was premedicated glycopyrrolaterrate and fentanyl 2 mcg/kg. Anaesthesia was induced with air, nitrous oxide and isoflurane and intubation was done by direct laryngoscopy with ETT 3.0 mm and after confirming bilateral air entry and the thoracotomy was started, neuromuscular blocker atracurium was only administered after the mass was moved away from the tracheobronchial tree (15).

In the above-mentioned 2-day-old neonate (with TEF and eosophageal atresia) the plan of anesthesia was to induce him using sevoflurane and intubate without using neuromuscular blockers. The preservation of spontaneous respiration reduced the chances of compression on vascular structure post neuromuscular blockade. The use of sevoflurane and ketamine during induction helped in preserving this spontaneous respiration. Hence, the plan should be based on preserving spontaneous respiration and rigid bronchoscopy and other emergency airway equipment should be kept ready, and postoperatively intensive care support should be given to avoid complications (16),(17),(18),(19).

Spine surgeries of the cervical region present a unique difficulty for patients having limited cervical extension. Cervical spine manipulation should be avoided to ensure no injury to the cord. Limited cervical extension leads to poor alignment of the oropharyngeal axis and poor glottic visualisation. The plan of anesthesia management should be drafted keeping in mind the above problems and their possible complications. Owing to the restricted mouth opening and cervical mobility, the plan of anesthesia for the above-mentioned patient with cervical mass was awake fiber optic oral intubation. Bhatnagar V et al., published a similar case report (of cervical chondroma at C2 level) having extension into the posterior pharyngeal wall. Their plan of anesthesia was awake fiberoptic oral intubation because of the limited neck extension. Nasal intubation was avoided owing to the posterior pharyngeal wall extension and the previous radiotherapy for the patient which would have made the area of interest friable (20). A study conducted by Khedr HSM et al., showed that use of intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) for patients with restricted cervical spine mobility is a suitable alternative to conventional laryngoscopy and limits the cervical spine manipulation (21). Retrospectively, the use of awake fiber optic orotracheal intubation proved to be a boon in the patient owing to the retropharyngeal erosion and extension which was missed on imaging.

Conclusion

A difficult intubation situation must be anticipated by an anesthesiologist. Alternative strategies need to be used if unanticipated difficulties are encountered. One should opt for the technique with which one is comfortable and confident. Henceforth, fiberoptic intubation remains the gold standard for anticipated difficult airway and video laryngoscope remains the gold standard for unanticipated difficult airway.

References

1.
Hagberg CA. Current concepts in the management of the difficult airway. Anaesthesiology News. 2014;11:45-72.
2.
Cattano D, Killoran PV, Iannucci D, Maddukuri V, Altamirano AV, Sridhar S, et al. Anticipation of the difficult airway: Preoperative airway assessment, an educational and quality improvement tool. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(2):276-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Crawley SM, Dalton AJ. Predicting the difficult airway. BJA Education. 2015;15(5):253-57. [crossref]
4.
Andranik Ovassapian, David O Warner; Principles of Airway Management, Third Edition. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:1255. [crossref]
5.
Bhat R, Mane RS, Patil MC, Suresh SN. Fibreoptic intubation through laryngeal mask airway for management of difficult airway in a child with Klippel-Feil syndrome. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014;8:412-14. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT. American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2022;136:31. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Chen PD, Yu SL, Chen S, Weng XH. Retrospective study of 61 patients with adult-onset Still’s disease admitted with fever of unknown origin in China. Clin Rheumatol. 2012;31(1):175-81. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Shaikh SI, Sarala BM, Bhosale R. Anaesthetic management of case of Ludwig’s angina: Forewarned is forearmed. Int J Biomed Adv Res. 2014;5:123-25. [crossref]
9.
Sung JK, Kim HG, Kim JE, Jang MS, Kang JM. Endotracheal tube intubation with the aid of a laryngeal mask airway, a fibreoptic bronchoscope, and a tube exchanger in a difficult airway patient: A case report. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014;66:237-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Langeron O, Semjen F, Bourgain JL, Marsac A, Cros AM. Comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask airway with the fibreoptic intubation in anticipated difficult airway management. Anaesthesiology. 2001;94:968-72. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Pahuja HD, Deshmukh SR, Lande SA, Palsodkar SR. Anaesthetic management of neonate with giant occipital meningoencephalocele: Case report. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2015;31(4):331-34. [crossref]
12.
Manhas Y, Chinnan Nk, Singh AK. Neonatal airway management in occipital encephalocele. AnesthAnalg. 2006;103(6):1632. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Hack HA, Wright NB, Wynn RF. The anaesthetic management of children with anterior mediastinal masses. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:837-46. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Tütüncü AÇ, Kendigelen P, Kaya G. Anaesthetic management of a child with a massive mediastinal mass. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2017;45(6):374-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Diwan S, Patil S, Jadhav S, Nair AS. Comprehensive perioperative management of an infant with huge mediastinal mass. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13(3):246-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Scrace B, McGregor K. Anterior mediastinal masses in paediatricanaesthesia. Anesthesia Tutorial of the Week. 2015;320:01-07.
17.
Pearson JK. Pediatric anterior mediastinal mass: A review article. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;3:248-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Stricker PA, Gurnaney HG, Litman RS. Anesthetic management of children with an anterior mediastinal mass. J Clin Anesth. 2010;22(3):159-63. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Lerman J. Anterior mediastinal masses in children. Semin Anesth Periop Med Pain. 2007;26:133-40. [crossref]
20.
Bhatnagar V, Karmarkar AA, Dwivedi D, Ray A. Anesthetic management of exicision of recurrent C2 chordoma with extension into posterior pharyngeal wall. J Mar Med Soc. 2017;19:128-30. [crossref]
21.
Khedr HSM, Hussein GZ, lsalam NEEE, Rezk MS. Degree of cervical mobility differs or not when using alternative way of intubation: Intubating laryngeal mask or classic laryngoscope. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2016;32(3):309-14. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57084.16607

Date of Submission: Apr 14, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 17, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jun 08, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 16, 2022
• Manual Googling: May 11, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 07, 2022 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com