Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 128704

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : SE01 - SE04 Full Version

An Outlook on Breastfeeding Assessment Tools- A Review


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/56970.16668
R Divya, Sachin Damke, Annie Paul, Spandandeep Sarma

1. Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Data Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University) Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, Sawangi Meghe, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Resident, Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Resident, Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. R Divya,
Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Data Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University) Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: divyamedico93@gmail.com

Abstract

Breastfeeding is a biological inheritance shared by women all around the world. It is the ‘natural’ way to feed new born babies, and the best source of nutrition for infants. After birth, loose stools and pneumonia are more frequent and serious in the formula fed babies, and can cause deaths. Otitis media, haemophilus influenza meningitis, and urinary tract infection are less frequent in babies who are fed human milk. Infants who are formula fed have a greater chance of developing chronic illnesses, such as asthma, diabetes mellitus type l, and intestinal diseases like inflammatory bowel disease. Coordination of mother and infant is most important for breast feeding to be successful. Ineffective breast feeding can contribute to mortality among new born babies and infants. Hence various breastfeeding assessment tools have been developed to advise and promote mother’s comfort, motivation, and assess the infant's neurobehavioural development. In this review, the literature to find out the most commonly used breastfeeding assessment tools, their salient features, advantages and disadvantages, acceptability, usage and validation have been reviewed.

Keywords

Human milk, Infant formula, LATCH scoring, Mother-infant dyad

Breastfeeding practice has been emphasized in the ancient Hindu scriptures, holy quran, and biblical records (1). Breastfeeding has short and long term advantages for both infant and mother. It also prevents the occurrence of several sudden and persistent diseases among the new born babies and infants. A study which conducted review on breast feeding assessment reveals that in developing nations, infants who are not breastfed are six to tenfold more probable to perish in the initial few months than breastfed infants (1).

The close contact between the mother and the child during breastfeeding fosters an emotional and psychological bond, leading to the healthy growth and development of the child (2). The infant mortality rate is the national indicator of health, and almost 50 % of infant deaths occur during the neonatal period (3). The need to feed infants with breast milk is a priority across the globe and is also essential for the child’s survival. Hence, it is very important to promote and provide support to mothers breastfeeding the infants (4). A study conducted in North India reveal that there was good attachment in 42% mother-infant pairs and infants were held in “correct position” by 60% mothers (5). A study in Bangladesh reported that correct breastfeeding position (74%) and good attachment (72.3%) as assessed by community health workers at late visits (67 days after delivery) were practiced by mothers (6).

The efficiency of breastfeeding must be assessed objectively to achieve adequate success in breastfeeding. One of the factors that ensure successful breastfeeding is the latching of the baby to the breast. Though it is normal norm for mothers to breastfeed, without proper understanding this can become a task, so complex for the mother-infant dyad. This needs proper coordination of the suck reflex, swallow reflex, ability to breathe, the neurobehavioral aspects of development, and also motivation and comfort of the mother (4).

During the initial days of life, support from the professionals present in the hospital is required to motivate the mother on the start and duration of breastfeeding. It is also important to predict the LATCH on of the infant to the breast which positively increases the success associated with breastfeeding. The World Breastfeeding Initiatives assessed a total of around 15 factors including programs and policies related to feeding of infants and young children in the year 2015, in which India had a score of 78 out of 150. This was just a marginal improvement from the score of 68 out of 150 that India had got in 2005 (3). There was a segment of a program that aimed to increase the rate of breastfeeding. It was suggested to use a tool that was reliable, reproducible and to find mother-infant duo who need additional support and frequent follow-ups.

BREASTFEEDING ASSESSMENT TOOLS

Many small and malnourished infants under six months of age have problems with breastfeeding and restoring effective exclusive breastfeeding is a common treatment goal. Assessment is a critical first step of case management. As a result, it is critical to check breastfeeding to discover lactational issues and evaluate progress (7).

A few key components are critical to the overall success of lactation. This includes the infant’s behaviour, the attitude of mother, position and posture, LATCH, efficient feeding, condition of the breast, infant’s well-being, and mother’s perspective about the nursing experience. It is important to figure out what the primary challenges are for each mother-infant dyad (8). More specific diagnosis will lead to more targeted and, eventually, more successful feeding for the new born and their caregivers.

The commonly used assessment tools are:

1. LATCH Scoring System (9).
2. Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (IBFAT) (13).
3. Mother Baby Assessment tool (MBA) (15).
4. Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (BBAT) (15).

LATCH Scoring System (9)

In 1994, Jensen et al., established the LATCH scoring system, which is regarded as one of the most essential breastfeeding evaluation tools (9). It is an evaluation method for determining the efficiency of early breastfeeding. As a result, it has been incorporated into each hospital’s medical record, and a record will be made before discharge under the term LATCH Charging System.

LATCH is a breastfeeding charting system which gathers information on individual breastfeeding sessions.

Each letter of the acronym LATCH denotes the key component which is the area of assessment.

• L - how well the infant latches onto the breast.
• A - the amount of audible swallowing noted.
• T - the mother’s nipple type.
• C - mother’s level of comfort.
• H - amount of help the mother needs to hold her infant to the breast.

The system assigns a numerical score, 0, 1, or 2, to five key components of breastfeeding. The system is visually represented in the same form as the Apgar scoring grid, and the numbers are handled in the same way. Each component scored from 0 to 2, total score is 10 (9) (Table/Fig 1).

Usage of the LATCH score: In India, a prospective cohort research was conducted in which a total of 93 mother and infant pairs were included. Assessment of breast feeding was done twice, the former on 1st day of life and the later at the time of discharge. Before being discharged, mothers having poor scores were advised accordingly. At six weeks, mother and infant pairs were assessed for exclusive breastfeeding and rate of weight gain and those with lower score (below 5) were advised and were given necessary help to breastfeed successfully (10).

The LATCH score is a simple, useful measure for health workers to use in maternity wards to assess breastfeeding, especially for documenting data and monitoring lactation. Because the first days of life are pivotal for the initiation and duration of breastfeeding, the influence of an early LATCH score is essential in the prediction of exclusive nursing at discharge. Low scores mean mothers will have to feed their kids, nutrition other than breastmilk in the first days of life, jeopardizing exclusive lactation’s near and future benefits.

In a study done by Zenobi C et al., paired t-test analysis showed improvement in the post-intervention LATCH score in total score (9.3 vs. 7.8, p=.000), as well as three sub scores, LATCH (1.8 vs. 1.5, p=0.01), audible swallowing (1.8 vs. 1.5, p=0.001) and hold (1.8 vs. 1.4, p=.000) (11). In a study done by Abbas IM et al., total LATCH scores positively correlated with duration of breastfeeding (n=128; r=0.26, p=0.003) and to mother’s scores (n=132; r=0.58, p=0.001). Correlations among LATCH measures ranged from 0.02 to 0.51 (12).

Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (IBFAT) (13)

IBFAT was created in 1988 and is a tool to assess and measure the infant’s rooting, fixing, and sucking activity while breastfeeding. It can be used easily by medical professionals, mothers, healthcare workers and nurses. The instrument consists of four components. Each of the components has a significant role in infant breastfeeding behaviour. These include: readiness to feed, rooting, fixing and sucking.

Every component is assigned a numerical value of 0, 1, 2, 3 based on the answer chosen and the total score is 12 which is the score for a vigorous, effective feeding (13). The end report of the breastfeeding assessment tool is as shown in (Table/Fig 2).

Usage of IBFAT score: In a study conducted by Mathew MK et al., the instrument was used to assess the breastfeeding behaviours of 60 healthy new born babies from birth to four days after birth (13). In total, 920 feeds were assessed by the mothers. The investigator also assessed 77 feeds. Inter-rater reliability for this study was 91%.

Mother Baby Assessment (MBA) Score (14)

The MBA (Mother Baby Assessment), also known as the breastfeeding Apgar score. It stands for maternal and infant breastfeeding behaviour assessment. It’s a ten point scale that rates how well a mother and baby nurse. The evaluation method may be used to follow a woman and her baby’s development as they learn to breastfeed, as well as in-hospital charting, referrals, triage, and research.

Mother baby assessment score is characterized by five point chart which involves the assessment of mother to infant breastfeeding behaviour. Sequential events during breastfeeding includes signalling, positioning, fixing (latching), milk transfer, ending. Baby signals by a cry, indicating a need for milk. This phase is terminated when the mother offers the breast for milk. Positioning is the placement of the baby, which is ready to receive the milk, the mother makes the comfortable position by using pillows or other aided, and the baby is well comforted with soft cloth, baby neck is neither flexed not extended. The position is very important such that the baby is located near the breast which initiate the head, mouth and tongue reflex. Fixing is the phase in which the act of sucking begins.

In this phase the mother’s nipple is positioned close to the lip of the baby. This procedure initiates the proprioception of the lips which cause the breast past the sucking pattern. Milk transfer, this is the important phase in breastfeeding because there is an actual intake of milk. The involuntary ejection reflex to the sucking action transfers the milk into the baby which satisfy the actual cry of the baby. Ending is the satiety which is the condition of end of the nursing phase. This phase ends by the detaching the baby from the mother’s breast.

Usage of MBA score: This tool is useful in hospital charting, when conducting research, practicing triage and making referrals (14) (Table/Fig 3).

Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (BBAT) (15)

Based on research findings and World Health Organisation (WHO) baby friendly initiative breastfeeding practice principles, five lactational physicians recommended the components of current breastfeeding assessment tools and decided to use some attributes that were similar to two LATCH items (swallowing, comfort) and one from the IBFAT (sucking) and added two new items to score positioning and attachment. The end report of the breastfeeding assessment tool is shown along with a detailed discussion of the scoring (Table/Fig 4).

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF BREASTFEEDING ASSESSMENT TOOLS

LATCH is a simple, cost effective tool which assesses both maternal and infant variables. Through this the areas which needs intervention can be detected even within 24 hours of child’s birth, so that exclusivity of breast feeding can be improved. IBFAT is also a simple and cost effective tool and is designed to be used by mothers, midwives and health professionals. In this, the infant’s readiness to feed, root, fix, suckle as well as the baby’s feed initiation status is assessed in items 2-5 but the mother’s evaluation score is not included in the IBFAT score (13). MBA is another simple tool used to follow up development of a new born, it can be used even for hospital charting and in triage (15). But still the problems associated with breastfeeding continued despite these tools. Hence there was a need for the development of a new breastfeeding assessment tool for effective breastfeeding and to maintain consistency of this effectiveness.

From studies conducted in various regions, it was revealed that tongue-tie may be a contributing factor to mother’s experiencing breast feeding problems, as difficulties with both breast and bottle feeding have been reported in 25-44% of infants with this condition (15),(16),(17),(18). Research was carried out to address this issue. A systematic review was conducted on “outcomes of frenotomy on breast feeding” and it revealed that main tools used to assess breast feeding were LATCH and IBFAT (19). Some of the studies have suggested that these assessment tools are too broad to show differences in pre and post frenotomy breast feeding scores and that other more subjective assessment should be used (16). Also in a study conducted by Riordan J et al., it was revealed that reliability coefficients for all three assessment tools (LATCH, IBFAT and MBA scores) are below acceptable levels for clinical decisions and hence they concluded that that these tools are invalid for clinical use (20). In a study conducted by Ingram J et al., it was found that, there was no difference between the LATCH or IBFAT scores across the timeline, but significant improvement was found for BBAT scores (from five days to eight weeks) in intervention group (post frenotomy) compared to the comparison group (p=0.02), which indicates that BBAT may be a more sensitive breastfeeding assessment tool (6).

Conclusion

Breastfeeding is the only source of sustenance for infants. A healthy mother-baby relationship is required for efficient lactation which involves the convenience of the mother, her understanding of breastfeeding, encouragement to the mother, and proper infant sucking and swallowing. Highlighting the significance of early breastfeeding, monitoring the activities of premature babies under kangaroo mother care, and breastfeeding charts in a hospital setting are the factors to be followed up after discharge.

Numerous assessment tools have been developed to promote breastfeeding. The majority of breastfeeding evaluation methods focus on the mother’s positioning and attitude, the breast’s health, the infant’s placement, connection, efficient feeding (e.g. clear swallow), the baby’s health, and the mother’s impression of the lactational experiences. However, there is no clear and well-defined cut off point for the gold standard technique, therefore each assessment instrument has its advantages and disadvantages. As a result, there is a need for a consistent and efficient breastfeeding assessment method that focuses on delivering breastfeeding assistance to mothers who are learning to lactate or who are having difficulty with an older child. To guarantee improved breastfeeding efficiency and higher maternal self confidence, reliable evaluation is necessary.

References

1.
Shembesh NM, Balo NNM, Singh R. Breast-feeding and weaning patterns in Benghazi, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. EMHJ - Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal [Internet]. 1997;3(2):251-57. [cited 2022 Jan 24]; Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/117295. [crossref]
2.
World Health Organization. Infant and young child feeding: Model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2009 [cited 2022 Jan 24]. Available from: https://apps.who int/iris/handle/10665/44117.
3.
Park K. Park’s Text book of Preventive and Social Medicine. 25th ed. Jabalpur: Bhanot Publication; 2019.
4.
Raja RK. Breastfeeding practice at its low in India. Health. 2016:54-55.
5.
Kishore MS, Kumar P, Aggarwal AK. Breastfeeding knowledge and practices amongst mothers in a rural population of North India: A community-based study. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 2009;55(3):183-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Ingram J, Johnson D, Copeland M, Churchill C, Taylor H. The development of a new breast feeding assessment tool and the relationship with breast feeding self-efficacy. Midwifery. 2015;31(1):132-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Brugaletta C, Roch KL, Saxton J, Bizouerne C, McGrath M, Kerac M. Breastfeeding assessment tools for at-risk and malnourished infants aged under 6 months old: A systematic review. Version 2. F1000Res. 2020;9:1310. Doi: 10.12688/f1000research.24516.2. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Segura SA. The challenges of breastfeeding in a complex world. InAnales de Pediatria. 2022;96(4):283-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Jensen D, Wallace S, Kelsay P. LATCH: A breastfeeding charting system and documentation tool. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing. 1994;23(1):27-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Sowjanya SV, Venugopalan L. LATCH score as a predictor of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 weeks postpartum: A prospective cohort study. Breastfeeding Medicine. 2018;13(6):444-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Zenobi C, Lawrence N. Improving Breastfeeding by Increasing LATCH Scores-Efficacy of a Resident Initiative. Pediatrics. 2018;142(1):673. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.142.1MA7.673.
12.
Abbas IM, Hasan RT. Assessment of LATCH tool regarding initiation of breastfeeding among women after childbirth. Assessment. 2015;5(05).
13.
Matthews MK. Developing an instrument to assess infant breastfeeding behaviour in the early neonatal period. Midwifery. 1988;4(4):154-65. [crossref]
14.
Mulford C. The mother-baby assessment (MBA): An “Apgar Score” for breastfeeding. J Hum Lact. 1992;8(2):79-82. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Messner AH, Lalakea ML, Aby J, Macmahon J, Bair E. Ankyloglossia: Incidence and associated feeding difficulties. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:36-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Griffiths DM. Do tongue-ties affect breastfeeding? J Hum Lact. 2004;20:409-14. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Ricke LA, Baker NJ, Diane J, Madlon-Kay DJ, DeFor TA. Newborn tongue-tie: Prevalence and effect on breast-feeding. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005;18:01-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Segal L, Stephenson R, Dawes M, Feldman P. Prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of ankyloglossia. Methodologic review. Can Fam Physician. 2007;53:1027-33.
19.
Webb AN, Hao W, Hong P. The effect of tongue-tie division on breastfeeding and speech articulation: A systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77:635-46. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Riordan J, Koehn M. Reliability and validity testing of three breastfeeding assessment tools. JOGNN. 1997;26(2):181-87. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/56970.16668

Date of Submission: Apr 07, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 04, 2022
Date of Acceptance: May 19, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? NA
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 14, 2022
• Manual Googling: May 11, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 15, 2022 (29%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com