Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 108749

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : SC05 - SC09 Full Version

Knowledge Attitude and Practice among Mothers towards Childhood Obesity: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/55021.16623
Ramya Ramanathan, Janani Shanmugavadivu Mohan, Shanthi Ramesh, Sundari Subramanian

1. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Paediatrics, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ramya Ramanathan,
No. 63 Gajalakshmi Street, Lakshmi Nagar, East Mudichur, Tambaram West, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: ramyacaduceus@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity is on the increasing trend among children, which leads to many co-morbidities. Obesity which was once a health problem of developed countries has now swept developing countries like India. As the home environment has a powerful influence on the health of a child it is very essential to intervene early in childhood and adolescence to prevent obesity/overweight.

Aim: To assess the Knowledge Attitude and Practice (KAP) among mothers regarding obesity in children.

Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted from October 2019 to March 2020. The sample size included 220 mothers with children aged between 6 to 14 years, who have attended the Paediatric outpatient department, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital in Tamil Nadu, India. After obtaining ethical clearance from the Institutional ethics committee, a predesigned questionnaire was used to collect the socio-demographic variables which included mother’s education and occupation, residence, family income, and the total number of family members, and for assessing KAP among mothers. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 22.0).

Results: The prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity was 52 (23.63%), with overweight representing 23 (10.45%) and obesity 29 (13.18%). There was a statistical significance difference when comparing mother’s knowledge of children with overweight/obesity versus normal weight regarding physical inactivity (p=0.01) and eating unhealthy foods (p=0.01), an attitude that a child being obese was not a problem (p=0.03), the practice of mothers who allowed seeing television while eating (p=0.001), not restricting media usage (p=0.01), not allowing children to play outdoors every day (p=0.001), and allowed children to eat junk foods (p=0.001).

Conclusion: Overweight and obesity were significant in children whose mothers were unaware of the risk factors like eating unhealthy foods and physical inactivity. Health education and interventional programs have to be planned to educate mothers as they play a major role in preventing obesity in children.

Keywords

Awareness, Children, Health education, Prevention, Risk-factors

The childhood obesity epidemic is becoming a major concern all over the world because of its significant impact on physical and psychosocial health (1). According to the World Health Organisation (WHO;2021), childhood obesity which was once considered as the health problem of high-income countries is now showing an upward trend in low and middle-income countries, especially in urban settings. The WHO has estimated that the prevalence of obesity and overweight has risen irrespective of sex, from just 4% in 1975 to over 18% in 2016 among children and adolescents aged 5-19 years. A basic explanation of obesity and overweight in children is due to an energy imbalance between calorie consumption and expenditure, which is related to environmental and societal changes affecting the children’s dietary and physical activity patterns (2).

Childhood obesity leads to several co-morbidities that can have both short and long-term complications. Obesity can cause breathing difficulties, obstructive sleep apnea, asthma, musculoskeletal problems, insulin resistance, hypertension, and psychological issues in children (3). Many of these childhood obesity-related problems can be tracked into adulthood and they will lead to a higher risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and middle-age mortality (4). As the child’s dietary habits, physical activity, the accessibility and availability of foods, and food-related processes are under parental control, it is easy to understand that their influence is a key risk factor for childhood weight gain and obesity. As the parents provide the contextual environment, addressing them is of prime importance and also it is not easy to reverse childhood obesity only through individual interventions (5). Primary prevention might play a major role in reducing the prevalence of obesity and overweight if started in early childhood with parental involvement (6).

There are many studies that have estimated the prevalence of obesity and overweight in children but only a few studies could be traced in the literature that assessed KAP of mothers towards childhood obesity. This study throws light on the potential risk factors for childhood obesity and provides useful information for curbing this emerging epidemic in children. Health education to mothers plays a vital role in preventing childhood obesity (7). This study was carried out with the main aim of assessing KAP of mothers regarding childhood obesity. The data obtained may be useful in developing programs for childhood obesity prevention.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was done over a period of six months (from October 2019 to March 2020), among mothers with children aged between 6 to 14 years, at Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) (002/SBMC/IHEC/2019/1261). After obtaining the informed consent, the subjects answered the sheets containing the restructured and predesigned questionnaire which was framed in two languages, English and Tamil. The volunteers interviewed the illiterate mothers and their responses were filled up in the questionnaire.

Inclusion criteria: Mothers who gave consent and were able to understand English or Tamil were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Mothers of children who were on steroid treatment, undergoing treatment for chronic diseases, syndromic children, children with congenital anomalies, mothers who do not understand Tamil or English, and who did not consent to participate were excluded from this study.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was estimated as 220, which was calculated with an estimated prevalence of overweight and obesity among school-going adolescents of 27.8% (8), an allowable error of 7%. A total of 220 mothers attending the Paediatrics outpatient department were randomly selected.

Questionnaire: The questionnaire had five sections and it was derived from the previous literature (9),(10),(11).

Section 1: Information was obtained on their socio-demographic variables which included the mother’s age, education and occupation, residence, family income, the total number of family members, age, and sex of the child. Modified BG Prasad scale 2020, was used to classify the socioeconomic status of participants, which included five classes namely class I with per capita income Rs. 7533 and above, class II with per capita income Rs. 3766-7532, class III with per capita income Rs. 2260-3765, class IV with per capita income Rs. 1130-2259, class V with per capita income Rs. 1129 and below (12).

Section 2: This section included the height, weight, and Body Mass Index (BMI) of the children. The height of the children was measured using a Stadiometer and weight was measured using an electronic weighing scale. BMI was calculated as weight (in kilograms) divided by height (in meter square). BMI number was plotted on the Revised Indian Academy of Paediatrics (IAP) Growth Charts for 5-18-year-old Indian Children and the adult equivalent of 23 cut-off lines was used for defining overweight and for obesity the adult equivalent of 27 cut-off lines was used (13).

Section 3: This part included three questions regarding the knowledge of mothers towards childhood obesity. The questions discussed the causes and complications of childhood obesity. The answers were set as ‘yes’ or ‘no’.

Section 4: This part included four questions for assessing the attitude of mothers towards childhood obesity. The questions used for assessing were, “An obese child is perceived as healthy, Being obese is not a problem to children, Obese children should be brought to seek doctor’s advice, Parents play a major role in preventing childhood obesity by promoting healthy lifestyles” and the responses were recorded as ‘agree’ or ‘disagree’.

Section 5: This part included five questions about the practice of mothers towards children like “Allowing children to eat seeing television programs, restricting television/video game/computer/media time to 1-2 hours/day, allowing your children to play outdoors every day, allowing your children to eat junk foods (chocolates/cakes/soft-drink/chips) daily, encouraging children to eat fresh fruits and vegetables daily. ’’ The answers were given as ‘yes’ or ‘no’.

A pilot study with 25 participants was conducted and those participants were not included in the main study. It was done to validate the questionnaire and the content was checked by the experts in our department and university. Face validity was established by giving the questionnaire to 10 mothers.

Statistical Analysis

Demographic variables in categorical/dichotomous were presented in frequencies with their percentages. Association between demographic variables and KAP was analysed using Chi-square test and odds ratio was given with 95% confidence interval. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 22.0). A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics: In the present study, the prevalence of obesity/overweight in children was 52 (23.63%) with obesity representing 29 (13.18%) and overweight 23 (10.45%). The mean age of children of study participants was 9.56±2.61 years and obesity /overweight was statistically significant in the 11 to 14 years age group (p=0.04). Among the 220 mothers who participated in this study, 143 (65%) of them were housewives and 77 (35%) of them were working. There was no significant association between mother's occupation and obesity/overweight in children (p=0.09). Regarding education, 6 (2.73%) were illiterate, 69 (31.36%) had education until high school and 145 (65.91%) have completed a degree and there was no statistical significance (p=0.21). The majority of the participants were from urban settings 173 (78.64%) and overweight/ obesity was statistically significant in the urban population when compared to the rural population (46 (26.59%) versus 6 (12.77%), p=0.04, respectively). According to the BG Prasad scale, 2020 socioeconomic status was divided into five classes and the majority 101 (45.91%) belonged to class I, and obesity/overweight was statistically significant (p=0.03) in class I group of the population when compared to other classes. The above results are summarised in (Table/Fig 1).

Knowledge of mothers towards childhood obesity: The complications of obesity were known to 115 (52.27%) of participants and 105 (47.72%) were unaware of the complications of obesity and this was not statistically significant (p=0.95). The majority of mothers 173 (78.63%) had knowledge that physical inactivity leads to obesity in children and this was statistically significant (p=0.01).The knowledge of mothers regarding childhood obesity caused by eating unhealthy foods was statistically significant (p=0.01). The children of mothers who were unaware that physical inactivity and eating unhealthy foods could lead to obesity have a high risk for obesity, with an Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval ) of 2.88 (1.44-5.76) and 3.07 (1.40-6.72) respectively. The knowledge of mothers towards childhood obesity is shown in (Table/Fig 2).

Attitude of Mother towards Childhood Obesity: Only 40 (18.18%) of mothers agreed that an obese child is healthy, the remaining participants disagreed with this attitude and this was not statistically significant (p=0.82). Around 41 (18.64%) participants had an attitude that a child being obese is not a problem, but 179 (81.36%) of participants disagreed with this attitude and this was statistically significant (p=0.03). The attitude of the participants who agreed that obese children should seek doctor’s advice 185 (84.09%) was statistically significant (p=0.01). Most of the participants 214 (97.27%) agreed to the attitude that parents play a major role in preventing obesity, and only 6 (2.72%) of participants disagreed with this attitude; this was not statistically significant (p=0.16). The children of mothers who do not consider obesity as a problem and who did not find it necessary for an obese child to seek medical advice have a high risk of becoming overweight/obese (Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) 2.21 (1.07-4.60) and 2.58 (1.20-5.53) respectively). (Table/Fig 3) represents the attitude of mothers towards childhood obesity.

Practice of mothers towards childhood obesity: Most of the mothers 145 (65.90%) did not allow their children to see TV programs while eating and 75 (3.09%) of mothers allowed their children to see TV programs and this practice was more prevalent in the overweight/obese group and this was statistically significant (p=0.001). The practice of mothers who restricted the use of media time in children to less than 2 hours per day 165 (75%) was statistically significant (p=0.01). Also, the practice of mothers who allowed their children to play outdoors every day 188 (85.45%) and mothers who did not allow their children to eat junk foods daily 180 (81.81%) was statistically significant (p=0.001). Although the majority of participants 205 (93.18%) encouraged their children to eat fruits and vegetables daily, this was not statistically significant (p=0.77). Children who were allowed to eat while seeing TV programs and to eat junk foods daily have a high risk for being obese, Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) 3.00 (1.58-5.70) and 3.51 (1.69-7.26) respectively. Also for children whose screen time was not restricted and who were not allowed to play outdoors every day, they have a higher risk of obesity, Odds Ratio 2.37 (1.21-4.64) and 3.60 (1.65-7.87) respectively. (Table/Fig 4) represents the practice of mothers towards childhood obesity.

Discussion

Several recommendations like improving the environment of the children where they live, implementing policies for making a healthy food environment, ensuring an accessible safe environment for promoting physical activity in children, easy access to the health facilities for obesity prevention and treatment services, have been proposed by the WHO Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity (2016) to halt the rapidly growing epidemic worldwide (14). The present study analysed various risk factors causing childhood obesity by assessing the mother’s KAP, as the deepest understanding of these factors are very essential to frame a prevention policy.

In this cross-sectional study, 29 (13.18%) of children were obese and 23 (10.45%) of children were overweight with a total overweight/obesity prevalence of 52 (23.63%). The prevalence of overweight increased from 9.7% before 2001 to 13.9% in studies reported after 2010 which shows an obvious increasing trend in overweight among children and adolescents in India (15). Compared to other Indian studies, the prevalence of obesity and overweight has significantly increased in the present study. In this study, no association between obesity/overweight and demographic variables like the mother’s age, education or occupation, and also the gender of the children were observed. These findings were in accordance with those from the study conducted by Dasappa H et al., who reported a prevalence of 13.20% overweight and 17.13% obesity among the school children aged 6 to 13 years and there was no association between obesity/overweight and age, gender, parent’s education, and family income (16).

The majority of the participants in the present study were from urban settings and obesity/overweight was statistically significantly higher in the urban population when compared to the rural population. According to the BG Prasad scale, 2020 socio-economic status was divided into five classes and the majority belonged to class I, and obesity/overweight was statistically significantly higher in the class I group of the population when compared to other classes. These results were in agreement with the study by Mahajan PB et al., (17). Thus areas of residence and socio-economic conditions are important contributors to overweight and obesity in our population.

In the present study, authors assessed the mother’s knowledge on complications of obesity, and half of the respondents knew about the consequences and complications of childhood obesity like diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease. Present study also found that majority of mothers had knowledge that risk factors, such as physical inactivity and eating unhealthy foods can lead to obesity. Mothers who were unaware of the influence of physical inactivity and eating unhealthy foods had children with a higher risk of obesity. According to a literature review about childhood obesity in North America, the three main factors causing obesity have been mentioned as genetics, overeating, and lack of exercise (18). Tremblay MS and Willms JD stated that physical activity in any form like organised sport or unorganised sport reduces the risk of children becoming overweight by 10-24% and obesity by 23-43% (19).

The majority of parents disagreed with the attitude that being obese is not a problem and that an obese child is healthy. Most of the participants agreed that obese children should seek doctors’ advice and that parents play a major role in preventing obesity. These results are consistent with Hatta NK et al., which reported that the majority of the study respondents disagreed that obese children mean healthy and accepted that they will pursue physician advice if their children have an increased BMI (9). This shows the participant's positive attitude towards obesity control.

The majority of the participants did not allow their children to see TV programs while eating, restricted the media time in children to less than 2 hours per day, did not allow their children to eat junk foods daily, and also encouraged their children to play outdoors every day. The study by Arluk SL et al., showed that children who have spent more hours of sedentary activity like watching computers and television greater than 2.3 hours and 2.8 hours per day respectively have a stronger association with obesity (20). The results of the present study also emphasise that risk factors like children watching television while eating, and children spending more time on media have a high risk of being obese.

Limitation(s)

Limitations of the present study include sample size and study design.This study included only participants from a geographically defined area who visited our department and hence the results of this study may not be representative of the entire state or country. As it was a cross-sectional study, it could study only the association but could not prove the cause. Despite these limitations, this study can be used to generate hypotheses for futuristic longitudinal and experimental studies which could study and establish the causal relationship.

Conclusion

Childhood obesity prevention plans and programs should be strengthened by focusing on periodic screening of children and adolescents, namely assessing the body compositions, along with the health education of mothers regarding eating habits and physical activity. Non-communicable diseases in adult-like type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases can be curbed by tracking obesity in children. This study emphasises the importance to create awareness among mothers regarding the importance of physical activity, healthy food habits, playing outdoor every day, restricting media time, not seeing television while eating, seeking doctor’s advice, and considering obesity to be a problem. All these factors are considered important risk factors for overweight/obesity in children/adolescents.

References

1.
Brown T, Moore TH, Hooper L, Gao Y, Zayegh A, Ijaz S, et al. Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7(7):CD001871. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001871.pub4. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Puska P, Nishida C, Porter D. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. World Health Organization. 2003:01-02.
3.
Daniels SR. Complications of obesity in children and adolescents. Int J Obes (Lond). 2009;33(Suppl 1):S60-65. Doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.20. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Childhood Obesity. Applying All Our Health. [Internet] Public Health England. [updated 2020 May 1; cited 2015 April 1]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childhood-obesity-applying-all-our-health/childhood-obesity-applying-all-our-health. 2021.
5.
Al Khudairy L, Loveman E, Colquitt JL, Mead E, Johnson RE, Fraser H, et al. Diet, physical activity and behavioral interventions for the treatment of overweight or obese adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6(6):CD012691. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd012691. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Summerbell CD, Moore HJ, Vogel C, Kreichauf S, Wild Gruber A, Manios Y, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for the development of obesity prevention programs targeted at preschool children. Obes Rev. 2012;13:129-32. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789x.2011.00940.x. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Döring N, Hansson LM, Anderson ES, Bohman B, Westin M, Magnusson M, et al. Primary prevention of childhood obesity through counselling sessions at Swedish child health center’s: Design, methods and baseline sample characteristics of the primrose cluster-randomised trial. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:01-03. Doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Patnaik L, Pattanaik S, Sahu T, Venkata Rao E. Overweight and obesity among adolescents-A comparative study between government and private schools. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52(9):779-81. Doi: 10.1007/s13312-015-0716-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Hatta NK, Rahman NA, Rahman NI, Haque M. Knowledge, attitude and practices among mothers regarding childhood obesity at Kuantan, Malaysia. Int Med J. 2017;24:200-04. Doi: 10.1159/000492795. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Karimy M, Armoon B, Fayazi N, Koohestani HR. A study on the knowledge, attitude, and practices of Iranian mothers towards childhood obesity. Obes Facts. 2019;12:669-77. Doi: 10.1159/000492795. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Mabiala Babela JR, Nika ER, Nkounkou Milandou KG, Missambou Mandilou SV, Bouangui Bazolana SB, Monabeka HG, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of parents facing child and adolescent obesity in Brazzaville, Congo. Global Pediatric Health. 2016;3:01-08. Doi: 10.1177/2333794X16675546. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Debnath DJ. Kakkar R. Modified BG Prasad Socio-economic Classification, Updated - 2020. Indian J Comm Health. 2020;32:124-25. [crossref]
13.
Khadilkar V, Yadav S, Agrawal KK, Tamboli S, Banerjee M, Cherian A, et al. Revised IAP growth charts for height, weight and body mass index for 5-to 18-year-old Indian children. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52:47-55. Doi: 10.1007/s13312-015-0566-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
World Health Organization. Taking action on childhood obesity.World Health Organization; 2018. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/274792/WHO-NMH-PND-ECHO-18.1-eng.pdf. Accessed 2021.
15.
Ranjani H, Mehreen TS, Pradeepa R, Anjana RM, Garg R, Anand K, et al. Epidemiology of childhood overweight & obesity in India: A systematic review. Indian J Med Res. 2016;143:160-74. Doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.180203. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Dasappa H, Fathima FN, Ganesh K, Prasad S. Prevalence, risk factors and attitude of parents towards childhood obesity among school children in Bangalore city. Int J Commun Med Public Health. 2018;5:749-53. Doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20180262. [crossref]
17.
Mahajan PB, Purty AJ, Singh Z, Cherian J, Natesan M, Arepally S, et al. Study of childhood obesity among school children aged 6 to 12 years in union territory of Puducherry. Indian J Community Med. 2011;36:45-50. Doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.80793. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Jadavji NM. Literature review-A 21st-century epidemic: Childhood obesity in North America. J Young Investig. 2006.
19.
Tremblay MS, Willms JD. Is the Canadian childhood obesity epidemic related to physical inactivity? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27:1100-05. Doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802376. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Arluk SL, Branch JD, Swain DP, Dowling EA. Childhood obesity’s relationship to time spent in sedentary behavior. Mil Med. 2003;168:583-86. Doi: 10.1093/milmed/168.7.583.57427. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/55021.16623

Date of Submission: Jan 18, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Mar 08, 2022
Date of Acceptance: May 03, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 25, 2022
• Manual Googling: Apr 15, 2022
• iThenticate Software: May 02, 2022 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com