Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 41725

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : RC01 - RC05 Full Version

Management of Unicameral Bone Cyst with Pathological Fracture of Proximal Humerus with Curettage, Fibular Grafting and Plate Osteosynthesis: A Retrospective Study


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57222.16625
Nageswara Rao Kancherla, Srikanth Eppakayala, Nagesh Cherukuri, Faisal Bin Omer, Maheshwar Lakkireddy, Shravan Peddamadyam, Arvind Bodla

1. Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 3. Additional Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 4. Senior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 5. Additional Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 6. Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 7. Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Srikanth Eppakayala,
H. No-6-137, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
E-mail: srikanth.e138@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Unicameral Bone Cysts (UBC) are benign fluid filled lesions at metaphyseal regions of long bones of immature skeleton. Several treatment options exist but none have proven to be the best. Curettage helps to remove the cyst membrane responsible for lysis of bone and fibular grafting with plate osteosynthesis which gives adequate stability to the fracture and promotes healing of the UBC of proximal humerus with pathological fracture.

Aim: To assess functional outcome, pain relief, healing of the cyst and recurrence of lesion with curettage and fibular bone grafting with proximal humerus plating in UBC of proximal humerus with pathological fracture.

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study done using the medical records of 10 patients with UBC of proximal humerus with pathological fracture treated with curettage and fibular grafting and plate osteosynthesis at Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, between January 2018 to December 2021. Patients were studied for functional outcome by Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) score before surgery and one year after surgery. Healing of the cysts was evaluated by using a modified classification system by Chang et al., and pain relief was evaluated with pre and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Paired t-tests were used to compare the MSTS scores and VAS scores.

Results: Mean age of the study group was 15.6±2.3 years with range of 11-19 years. The MSTS score increased significantly after surgery from 11.6±2.06 to 27.3±1.6, p<0.0001. Cysts had healed completely in seven cases, partially in three cases and recurrence was seen in three cases at the end of one year. Mean VAS scores decreased significantly from 7.60±0.97 to 1.40±0.97 after the surgery. Among three cases with recurrence of UBC, two cases were diagnosed at eight months and one case at 12 months after surgery.

Conclusion: Treatment of UBC of proximal humerus with pathological fracture by curettage, fibular grafting and plate osteosynthesis gives good functional outcome and cyst healing rate. It is a safe and effective procedure without any complications.

Keywords

Benign bone lesions, Musculoskeletal tumor society score, Recurrence, Simple bone cyst

The UBC or simple/solitary bone cysts are benign fluid filled cavities of bone that enlarge over time, resulting in thinning of the bone and pathological fractures. These are the most common benign lytic lesions in children and are assumed to occur due to the disturbance in local blood flow (1). These cysts are commonly reported in the metaphyseal areas of long bones with open physis and most often in proximal humerus and proximal femur (2).

Incidentally detected, asymptomatic UBC may spontaneously resolve with skeletal maturity (3). The UBC do present with pathological fractures due to cortical destabilisation. Once a pathological fracture occurs, healing of cysts is impaired and immobilisation, observation often leads to recurrent fractures in 62-82% of cases (4),(5),(6). Therefore, some form of surgical treatment is essential for the cysts with pathological fractures to heal.

Pathological fractures due to UBC are more common in humerus than in femur (7). This may be due to the non weight bearing nature of humerus bone and therefore significant pain is not felt by patients until the fracture. Thus, proximal humeral UBC’s enlarge and weaken the cortex until they end up in a pathological fracture (8). Various surgical options like percutaneous decompression with cannulated screws or pins, intralesional steroid injection or injection of bone marrow, curettage with or without bone grafting, intramedullary nailing or combination of curettage and bone graft substitutes were described (9),(10),(11),(12),(13),(14). Each of these treatment methods has variable success rates.

Kokavec M et al., reported that only 3 out of 19 patients operated with curettage and bone grafting had recurrence, yielding an effective rate of 84.2% (15). Traub F et al., reported 100% cure rate with curettage and bone grafting in their study with five years follow-up (16). In a recent review by Noordin S et al., it is reported that curettage and bone grafting in UBCs has healing rates as low as 25-36% (17). There is a controversy in the existing literature regarding healing rates and rate of recurrence following curettage and bone grafting for UBC. Most of the studies published were on curettage and bone grafting alone or curettage and bone grafting with intramedullary nails (18),(19).

Present study highlights the importance of curettage and fibular bone grafting with proximal humerus plating in the management of displaced pathological fractures of proximal humerus owing to UBC in terms of functional outcome, healing of cyst, pain relief and recurrence of lesion.

Material and Methods

This was a retrospective study done by using medical records of 10 patients with pathological fracture of proximal humerus with UBC treated with curettage, fibular grafting and plate osteosynthesis at Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, between January 2018 and December 2021. The analysis of the data was done in March 2022.

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged between 10-20 years gave consent, radiologically and histopathologically proven UBC of proximal humerus with displaced pathological fracture.

Exclusion criteria: Asymptomatic UBC of proximal humerus, UBC of proximal humerus without pathological fracture, UBC involving other than proximal humerus, recurrent UBC of proximal humerus.

Preoperative Assessment

A detailed history and clinical examination was carried out at the initial visit to assess signs and symptoms and anteroposterior and lateral X-ray views, Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans (Table/Fig 1)a,(Table/Fig 1)b,(Table/Fig 1)c of the involved shoulder were recorded. Patients were then planned for core cut biopsy and once histopathological diagnosis [Table/Fig-1d] was confirmed patients were taken up for definitive surgery.

Surgical Technique

All the cases were operated by a senior orthopaedic surgeon under general anaesthesia. Proximal humerus was exposed through anterolateral approach and an adequate sized window was made over the proximal humerus. All the septae were opened and cyst was made into a single cavity and was thoroughly curetted. Curetted bone and membrane of the cyst cavity was sent for histopathological examination. Length of the cavity was measured after curetting the cyst and approximate sized fibular strut graft was harvested from ipsilateral leg [Table/Fig-2a] and was inserted into the distal medullary cavity. Fracture was reduced and a proximal humerus locking plate was applied (Table/Fig 2)b,(Table/Fig 2)c. Wound was closed in layers and a shoulder arm immobiliser was applied for four weeks. After four weeks, pendulum exercises were started and active shoulder abduction exercises were started after six weeks.

Postoperative Assessment

Patients were followed regularly for one month interval for first six months and then every three months until last follow-up (Table/Fig 3)a,(Table/Fig 3)b. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically at every follow-up for functional outcome (Table/Fig 4), healing of cyst, pain and radiological signs of recurrence.

The MSTS score was recorded at each follow-up and compared to preoperative score. The MSTS functional score measures outcomes in six categories including pain, function, and emotional acceptance for all patients. For upper extremity, hand positioning, manual dexterity and lifting ability were recorded (20). Each parameter was scored 0 to 5 and combined for a possible total score of 30. Intermediate values of 2 or 4 were assigned based on the examiner’s judgment when achievement or performance falls between the specified values (Table/Fig 5). For lifting ability, limited term indicates limitations in independent lifting. Helping term means that the patient cannot lift upper limb independently but useful in assisting the contra lateral upper limb in doing activities.

Healing of the cyst was evaluated by using a modification of a classification system first described by Neer CS et al., (21) and modified later on by Chang CH et al., (22). According to this classification, operated UBC were classified into four types depending on healing response, 1) healed cyst- cyst filled by formation of new bone with or without small static, radiolucent areas less than 1 cm in size, 2) healing cyst- a static defect, radiolucent areas less than 50% of the diameter of the bone with enough cortical thickness to prevent fracture, 3) persistent cyst- Radiolucent areas greater than 50% of bone diameter with a thin cortical rim and no increase in cyst size, 4) recurrent cyst- cyst reappeared in a previously obliterated area or a residual radiolucent area has increased in size.

Pain relief was evaluated by using VAS that grades pain from 0-10 where score 0 is no pain and score 10 is worst pain (23). The VAS score was recorded preoperatively and was compared to postoperative VAS score recorded at first follow-up visit.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software (version 22.0). Paired t-tests were used to compare the MSTS scores and VAS scores. The statistically significant difference level was set at p<0.05.

Results

Mean age of the study group was 15.6±2.3 years with range of 11-19 years. Out of the 10 patients, six were males and four were females. All the patients were followed for at least 12 months with a mean follow-up period of 22.5±8.0 months (range:12-37 months) (Table/Fig 6)a,(Table/Fig 6)b,(Table/Fig 6)c and (Table/Fig 7)a,(Table/Fig 7)b. All the cases are summarised in (Table/Fig 8). The MSTS score has increased significantly from 11.6±2.06 to 27.3±1.6 one year after surgery (p<0.0001) (Table/Fig 9). As per the described Neer CS et al., (21) and Chang CH et al., (22) classification, five patients had healed cysts, two patients had healing cysts and recurrent cysts were seen in three patients at the end of one year. Mean VAS scores before surgery was 7.60±0.97 and had decreased significantly after the surgery to 1.40±0.97 (p<0.0001). Among three cases with recurrence of UBC, two cases were diagnosed as early as eight months after the surgery and one case was diagnosed at 12 months (Table/Fig 10)a,(Table/Fig 10)b. There were no intraoperative complications in the studied subjects. One patient had superficial surgical site infection which was treated successfully with oral antibiotics and regular wound dressings.

Discussion

The UBC in proximal humerus can be managed with multiple methods but there is no common consensus about the best treatment method. In 5-10% cases, spontaneous resolution of the cyst occurs (24). But majority of the cases require some form of surgical intervention. Observation and regular follow-up is advised when the cyst is small and the risk of pathological fracture is minimal. Cases with undisplaced pathological fractures through the cyst were treated with immobilisation by cast application.

Surgical treatment methods known at present were aspiration of the cyst and injection of steroid, aspiration and marrow bone injection, curettage followed by bone grafting, Continuous decompression with elastic intramedullary nails and combination of above treatment methods (9),(10),(11),(12),(13),(14). Curettage and bone grafting is a common procedure routinely performed when there is a displaced pathological fracture due to UBC. Curettage helps in the surgical removal of the cyst membrane from which, the cyst fluid and destructive enzymes are secreted. It helps to connect the cyst with the adjacent bone marrow leading to the healing of UBC (19). Bone grafting either autograft or allograft, hastens the healing process by acting as osteoconductive material.

In this study, functional outcome measured by the improvement in MSTS score can be compared to study conducted by Zhang P et al., (25) (p<0.001). Mean MSTS score of 27.3 in present study was comparable to the average MSTS score of 28.5 by Erol B (19). Both the studies mentioned above used elastic intramedullary nails for internal fixation after curettage when compared to this study wherein proximal humerus locking plate as an internal fixation device was used in patients above 15 years of age. Plate was used to obtain anatomical reduction and rigid fixation of fibular graft and to allow early range of motion of shoulder. According to a recent study by Wang X et al., the function of the shoulder joint in the elastic nailing group was better than the control group when curettage and mixed bone grafting either with or without elastic intramedullary nailing was done using Neer Score (26).

Several authors compared curettage and bone grafting with steroid injections. Steroid injections have slightly higher healing rates compared to curettage and bone grafting but results were statistically not significant (27),(28),(29). In a retrospective study by Bukva B et al., with 129 patients, curettage of intracystic membrane and implantation of bone graft was reported as a reliable procedure wherein complete healing could only be achieved with open surgery (30). Study reported by Mik G et al., reported 55 patients who were treated with percutaneous decompression and bone grafting. In this series, 2nd and 3rd surgeries were required to achieve healing in 11 and 2 patients respectively (31). In a case series of 20 patients reported by Hunt KJ et al, five patients needed second surgery and one patient needed third surgery to achieve healing (32). In present study, three patients had recurrence and were operated with a second surgery.

In the study published by Zhang P et al., complete healing was reported in 14 cases and partial healing in four cases out of the total 18 cases without any recurrences (25). In a similar study by Erol B complete and partial radiographic healing was achieved in 28 patients (82%) and six patients (18%), respectively and no recurrence was observed (19). Similarly, in the study reported by Kokavec M et al., out of the 19 patients with bone cysts treated with curettage and bone grafting only three patients had recurrence during the follow-up yielding an effective rate of 84.2% (15). Out of the 10 cases in present study, five cases had complete healing of cysts while two cases had healing cysts at one year. The effectiveness of the procedure was 70%. According to recent meta-analysis by Kadhim M et al., surgical curettage has a healing rate of 90% with the supplementation of autograft, allograft or any bone substitution material (33).

In the recent times, use of elastic intramedullary nailing was more popularised. Studies by Roposch A et al., Li W et al., and De Sanctis and Andreacchio A showed that the usage of elastic intramedullary nails has good healing rate and least rate of recurrence [34-36]. This is attributed to the continuous decompression of the cyst cavity by intramedullary nail. The drawback was a higher rate residual cysts. Combining curettage and bone grafting with intramedullary nails has shown good results with less recurrence rate and healing (19). Fibular bone grafting in this study aids in continuous decompression akin to intramedullary nails.

Mean VAS scores in this study had decreased significantly after surgery from 7.60±0.97 to 1.40±0.97.This may be because of inclusion of the displaced pathological fractures, significant pain relief after the fracture reduction and fixation with plate. The average postoperative VAS score in this study was comparable to the reported score by Zhang P et al., with a significant difference p<0.05 (25).

In present study, three patients (30%) had recurrence after completion of the healing at the end of 12 months. Similarly, Oppenheim WL and Galleno H study reported a recurrence of 43.2% in 37 children with simple bone cysts who underwent curettage and bone grafting (28). In an observational study by Zhang K et al., curettage and bone grafting without intramedullary nailing was done in 32 cases and 10 cases (32%) had recurrence (18).

Use of proximal humerus locking plate with fibular grafting in this study had an advantage of a stable fixation allowing early range of motion exercises and healing. However, comparison of intramedullary nails and plating in a single study would be more useful in determining a standard treatment approach for UBC of proximal humerus.

Limitation(s)

Small sample size, lack of control group, short follow-up and retrospective nature of study were the limitations of this study.

Conclusion

Curettage and fibular grafting with proximal humerus locking plate osteosynthesis for displaced pathological fractures of proximal humerus with UBC has shown good results in terms of functional outcome, cyst healing rate, pain relief and the rate of recurrence.

Acknowledgement

No benefits in any form have been received from any commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject in this manuscript.

References

1.
Broder H. Possible precursor of unicameral bone cysts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1968;50(3):503-07. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Kalil RK. Simple bone cyst. In: Fletcher JA, Hogendoorn PCW, Mertens F, editors. WHO Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. IARC; 2013; pp. 350-51.
3.
Wilkins RM. Unicameral bone cysts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:217-24. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Garceau GJ, Gregory CF. Solitary unicameral bone cysts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954;36:267-80. [crossref]
5.
Cohen J. Simple bone cysts: Studies of cyst fluid in six cases with a theory of pathogenesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960;42:609-16. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Neer CS, Francis KC, Johnston AD, Kiernan HA. Current concepts on the treatment of solitary unicameral bone cyst. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973;97:40-51. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Docquier PL, Delloye C. Treatment of simple bone cysts with aspiration and a single bone marrow injection. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23:766-73. [crossref]
8.
Hagmann S, Eichhorn F, Moradi B, Gotterbarm T, Dreher T, Lehner B, et al. Mid- and long-term clinical results of surgical therapy in unicameral bone cysts. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12(1):281. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Brecelj J, Suhodolcan L. Continuous decompression of unicameral bone cyst with cannulated screws: A comparative study. J Pediatr Orthop Br. 2007;16:367-72.22. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Scaglietti O, Marchetti PG, Bartolozzi P. The effects of methylprednisolone acetate in the treatment of bone cysts. Results of three years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1979;61:200-04. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Zamzam MM, Abak AA, Bakarman KA, Al-Jassir FF, Khoshhal KI, Zamzami MM. Efficacy of aspiration and autogenous bone marrow injection in the treatment of simple bone cysts. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1353-58. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Yildirim C, Akmaz I, Sahin O. Simple calcaneal bone cysts: A pilot study comparing open versus endoscopic curettage and grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1626-31. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Masquijo J, Baroni E, Miscione H. Continuous decompression with intramedullary nailing for the treatment of unicameral bone cysts. J Child Orthop. 2008;2(4):279-83. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Hou H, Wu K, Wang C, Chang S, Lin W, Yang R. Treatment of unicameral bone cyst. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(4):855-62. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Kokavec M, Fristakova M, Polan P, Bialik GM. Surgical options for the treatment of simple bone cyst in children and adolescents. The Israel Medical Association Journal: IMAJ. 2010;12(2):87-90.
16.
Traub F, Eberhardt O, Fernandez FF, Wirth T. Solitary bone cyst: A comparison of treatment options with special reference to their long-term outcome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):162. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Noordin S, Allana S, Umer M, Jamil M, Hilal K, Uddin N. Unicameral bone cysts: Current concepts. Ann Med Sur. 2018;34:43-49. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Zhang K, Wang Z, Zhang Z. Comparison of curettage and bone grafting combined with elastic intramedullary nailing vs curettage and bone grafting in the treatment of long bone cysts in children. Medicine. 2019;98(25):e16152. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Erol B. Treatment of pathological fractures due to simple bone cysts by extended curettage-grafting and intramedullary decompression. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(3):288-96. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:241-46. [crossref]
21.
Neer CS, Francis KC, Marcove RC, Terz J, Carbonara PN. Treatment of unicameral bone cyst. A follow-up study of one hundred seventy-five cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966,48:731-45. [crossref]
22.
Chang CH, Stanton RP, Glutting J. Unicameral bone cysts treated by injection of bone marrow or methylprednisolone. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:407-12. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.84B3.0840407[PubMed]
23.
Wang W. Visual analogue score. Chinese J Minimally Invasive Neurosurg. 2004;9(11):3985-89.
24.
Kim M, Joo S, Jung S. The role of fractures on pathologic bone in healing of proximal humerus unicameral bone cysts. J Orthop Surg. 2018;26(2):230949901877836. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Zhang P, Zhu N, Du L, Zheng J, Hu S, Xu B. Treatment of simple bone cysts of the humerus by intramedullary nailing and steroid injection. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):70. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Wang X, Han J, Li Y, Liu Y, Luo J. Comparative efficacy and safety profile for the treatment of humeral bone cysts in children: Curettage and mixed bone grafting either with or without elastic intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):241. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Farber JM, Stanton RP. Treatment options in unicameral bone cysts. Orthopedics. 1990;13(1):25-32. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Oppenheim WL, Galleno H. Operative treatment versus steroid injection in the management of unicameral bone cysts. J Pediatr Orthop. 1984;4:01-07. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Pentimalli G, Tudisco C, Scola E, Farsetti P, Ippolito E. Unicameral bone cysts: Comparison between surgical and steroid injection treatment. Archives of Orthopaedic and Traumatic Surgery. 1987;106(4):251-256. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Bukva B, Vrgoc? G, Abramovic´ D, Duc? ic´ S, Brkic´ I, C ? engic´ T. Treatment of unicameral bone cysts in children: A comparative study. Acta Clin Croat. 2019;58(3):403-09. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Mik G, Arkader A, Manteghi A, Dormans J. Results of a minimally invasive technique for treatment of unicameral bone cysts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(11):2949-54. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Hunt KJ, Bergeson A, Coffin CM, Randall RL. Percutaneous curettage and bone grafting for humeral simple bone cysts. Orthopedics. 2009;32:89. [crossref]
33.
Kadhim M, Thacker M, Kadhim A, Holmes L Jr. Treatment of unicameral bone cyst: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Orthop. 2014;8(2):171-91.11. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Roposch A, Saraph V, Linhart WE. Flexible intramedullary nailing for the treatment of unicameral bone cysts in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1447-53. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Li W, Xu R, Du M, Chen H. Comparison of titanium elastic intramedullary nailing versus injection of bone marrow in treatment of simple bone cysts in children: A retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):343. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
De Sanctis N, Andreacchio A. elastic stable intramedullary nailing is the best treatment of unicameral bone cysts of the long bones in children? J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(4):520-25.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57222.16625

Date of Submission: Apr 20, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 23, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jun 28, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 23, 2022
• Manual Googling: May 07, 2022
• iThenticate Software: May 23, 2022 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com