Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 71971

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : QC01 - QC05 Full Version

Early Prediction of Small for Gestational Age: The Predictive Role of Pregnancy Associated Plasma Protein-A


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/55106.16545
Pavan Bhargava Chandramohan, Pragyan Paramita Pradhan, Taru Shikha, Sarita Agrawal, Sarita Rajbhar, Chandrashekhar Shrivastava

1. Senior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kodagu Institute of Medical Sciences, Madikeri, Karnataka, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Srirama Chandra Bhanja Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Guru Gobind Singh Hospital, Delhi, India. 4. Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India. 6. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Pavan Bhargava Chandramohan,
Swastik, Opp Kaveri Ashrama, Appaiah Swamy Road, Virajpet,
Kodagu-571218, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: swastikbcp@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Small for Gestational Age (SGA) is a compelling obstetric adversity with multiple consequences. Early diagnosis, although a challenge, can help blunt the adverse effects. One of the markers is Pregnancy Associated Plasma Protein-A (PAPP-A) which can be an early predictor of SGA.

Aim: To find the association of low levels of pregnancy associated plasma protein-A with small for gestational age.

Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India, between June 2018 and September 2019. The demographic profile, PAPP-A Multiples of Median (MoM) levels, complications in pregnancy and birth outcome data of a total of 203 women were noted. For analysis of descriptive and categorical data, IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software version 23.0 was used. Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were performed to assess normality of distribution Qualitative data were analysed by Chi-square test and categorical data, by Mann-Whitney’s U test.

Results: The mean maternal age of the study sample was 27.4±2.23 years. The prevalence of SGA was 18.2%, out of which PAPP-A MoM levels were ≤0.49 in 59.4%. The association between PAPP-A levels and SGA was statistically significant (p-value=0.03) with unadjusted odds ratio of 8.27 (95% CI, 3.78-18.08). Simple logistic regression showed an inverse relationship of PAPP-A with SGA. At the cut-off of ≤0.49 considered in the study, sensitivity was 86.7%, specificity was 54.1%, positive predictive value was 29.5% and negative predictive value was 94.8%. Positive likelihood ratio was 1.88 and negative likelihood ratio was 0.24 and the diagnostic accuracy was found to be 59.9%.

Conclusion: An inverse relationship between levels of PAPP-A MoM (≤0.49) and SGA was found in the study. Low levels of PAPP-A MoM can be a useful early predictor of SGA.

Keywords

Early diagnosis, Foetal outcome indicator, Placental biomarkers

Small for Gestational Age (SGA) is a neonate with birth weight less than 10th percentile of the expected birth weight (1). It has a major influence on perinatal morbidity and mortality. Foetal Origins of Adult Diseases (FOAD), the Barker hypothesis, observes that the children born SGA suffer short and long-term cardiovascular, neurological and endocrinological adverse consequences (2). Pregnancy Associated Plasma Protein-A (PAPP-A) is one of the several markers studied for early identification of adverse pregnancy outcomes. It is a well-established bio-marker for screening of Down syndrome in the first trimester (11 to 13+6 weeks) (1),(2),(3). Studies indicate that a decreased level of PAPP-A may be a sign of impaired placental implantation and function (4),(5).

The PAPP-A, a placental glycoprotein, cleaves Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein-4 (IGFBP-4) and is a positive regulator of Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) (6). The IGF is known to have a significant influence on foetal growth. Decreased levels of PAPP-A in the maternal serum, determined in the first trimester, are associated with poor placental function, a known etiology for SGA (7),(8). Therefore, PAPP-A can be used as a marker for early detection of the SGA (9). Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) recommends that those pregnant women with a serum PAPP-A <0.4 Multiples of Median (MoM) in the first trimester must receive increased ultrasound surveillance for foetal growth disorders (1). However, there exists no definition for low levels of PAPP-A and what cut-off of PAPP-A MoM is to be considered pathological, remains undefined. Thus, the aim of this research was to study the association of low levels of PAPP-A levels with SGA babies.

Material and Methods

This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India, between June 2018 and September 2019. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institute Ethics Committee of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur (AIIMSRPR/IEC/2018/168).

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: All women attending the antenatal clinic with singleton pregnancy, having reports of PAPP-A MoM levels and willing to participate in the study were included in the study. Those women with unsure dates, multiple pregnancy, congenital anomalies and known maternal chronic diseases like thyroid dysfunction, Diabetes Mellitus, collagen vascular diseases, chronic hypertension, liver and renal disorders were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated from prevalence of SGA using the formula:

Z2p(1-p)/d2

where,

Z=1.96, p=14.54% as per a study conducted by Agarwal R et al., et al., (9) and d=0.05. Considering a dropout rate of 10%, the sample size estimate was 210.

Study Procedure

Total 210 women with serum PAPP-A MoM levels, drawn between 11 weeks and 13 weeks and six days of gestation were recruited (9). After initial evaluation, the women were followed-up in the antenatal clinic. At each visit, history taking and clinical examination were done and reports of routine investigations relevant to that particular gestational age (including the values of double marker) were noted. Ultrasonographic findings of dating scan, early anomaly scan (11-13+6 weeks), targeted imaging for foetal anomalies (18-22 weeks), growth scans and doppler studies were noted. After delivery, gestational age at birth of the baby, mode of delivery, the sex of the newborn and birth-weight were noted. The primary outcome was SGA. Birthweight <10th percentile for that gestational age was considered as SGA (1). The birth weight was plotted on the INTERGROWTH-21st chart to determine the percentile. Low PAPP-A was defined as MoM ≤0.49, measured between 11 and 13+6 weeks of gestation (10),(11).

Out of 210, four women were lost to follow-up and three women had abortion. The data of 203 women were analysed to find the association of low levels of PAPP-A MoM with SGA.

Statistical Analysis

Microsoft excel version 15.0 was used for compilation of data. For analysis of descriptive and categorical data, IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), statistical software version 23.0 was used. Shapiro-Wilk’s and Kolmogorov-Smirnov’s tests were performed to assess normality of distribution. Qualitative data were analysed by Chi-square test and Categorical data, by Mann-Whitney’s U test. To obtain the strength of association, Odds ratio was used. Simple logistic regression estimate of PAPP-A in predicting SGA, using Wald T test, was obtained. Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) was used for analysis of the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for PAPP-A. The p-value of 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The mean maternal age was 27.4±2.23 years. Most women were urban residents (59.11%, n=120). Total 110 (54.18%) women were primigravida. The mean Body Mass Index (BMI) (12) was 23.92±1.33 kg/m2.

The prevalence of SGA in the study was 18.2% (n=37). The incidence of SGA was found to be higher in urban residents (p-value=0.023) and in those women who had Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) conceptions (p-value=0.007). No association of SGA with age, socio-economic status (13), gravidity or BMI was found (Table/Fig 1). PAPP-A levels were not found to be significantly different in women belonging to different age groups, socio-economic status (13), residential status, gravidity and different BMI groups (Table/Fig 2).

The lowest PAPP-A MoM level recorded was 0.21 and the highest was 5.54. The mean PAPP-A MoM level was 1.89±1.34. PAPP-A MoM levels were ≤0.49 in 47 (23.15%). Among women with PAPP-A MoM level ≤0.49, 22 (46.8%) had SGA whereas among women with PAPP-A MoM level ≥0.5, only 15 (9.6%) had SGA (Table/Fig 3). The median PAPP-A MoM level among SGA neonates was significantly lower than neonates born non SGA (p-value=0.03) (Table/Fig 4).

The association between PAPP-A levels and SGA was statistically significant (p-value=0.03) with unadjusted odds ratio of 8.27 (95% CI) 3.78-18.08). Simple logistic regression showed inverse relationship of PAPP-A and SGA i.e. the lower the PAPP-A, the higher the SGA (Table/Fig 5).

The strength of prediction was moderate. Area Under the Curve was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.611,0.823), p-value=0.03 reflecting an optimal cut-off of 0.665 for prediction of SGA of PAPP-A MoM with a sensitivity of 73.5% and specificity of 67.6% positive predictive value was 46.8% and negative predictive value was 90.3% with a positive likelihood ratio of 3.94 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.47 (Table/Fig 6).

At the cut-off of ≤0.49 considered in the current study, sensitivity was 86.7%, specificity was 54.1%, positive predictive value was 29.5% and negative predictive value was 94.8%. Positive likelihood ratio was 1.88 and negative likelihood ratio was 0.24. At these values, the diagnostic accuracy was found to be 59.9%.

In this study, low levels of PAPP-A were found to be significantly associated with preeclampsia, preterm deliveries, and Caesarean deliveries and birth of male child (Table/Fig 7).

No significant association of low PAPP-A MoM was found with oligohydramnios (p-value=0.120) or increased need for NICU admissions (n=16, p-value=0.299).

Discussion

Small for gestational age refers to the neonates with birth weight less than 10th percentile for the gestational age (1). It is an adverse entity with recognised short- and long-term adverse consequences. The aim of this study was to find the association of low levels of PAPP-A MoM with Small for gestational age. Since, exists no standard cut-off for defining the low levels of PAPP-A MoM, ≤0.49 was considered, based on the findings of previous studies (9),(10),(11).

The mean maternal age was 27.4±2.23 years in the present study. The study by Hoseini MS et al., matches the present study where the mean age was 27.88±5.97 years (17-38 years) (14). The mean maternal age in the study by Mula R et al., was 34.7±4.1years in the SGA group which is higher than that of the present study (15).

In the present study, 54.2% (n=110) women were primigravida. In their prospective longitudinal study, Mula R et al., found that those women with SGA neonates were more frequently nulliparous compared to those women who had normal birthweight neonates (78% vs 63.1%, p-value=0.04) (15). Although this finding is comparable, the present study did not determine the causal association.

The mean BMI was 23.92±1.33 kg/m2 in the present study but found no significant association with SGA. Robillard PY et al., found that 25% of SGA neonates were born to women with BMI between 10 and 14 kg/m2 (16).

The present study found a significant association between ART conceptions and SGA (p-value=0.007). In the study by Gundu S et al., 5.8% (n=78) had ART conceptions but statistical association was not derived (10). Mula R et al., found that 4% of ART conceptions had SGA neonates and noted no significant association (p-value=0.286) (15).

The mean PAPP-A MoM level in the present study was 1.89±1.34. In their study, Agarwal R et al., found that the median PAPP-A MoM value was significantly lower (0.61 MoM; range 0.30-2.68) in SGA group compared to control group (1.47 MoM; range 0.51-3.06) (p-value=0.001) (9). Hoseini MS et al., found that the mean PAPP-A level at screening was 1.21±0.66 (range, 0.28-3.37) (14).

The prevalence of SGA was found to be 18.2% in our study which is comparable with the studies of Agrawal R et al., (14.54%) (9) and Hoseini MS et al., (14.5%) (14). These numbers show that the prevalence is significant and demands attention. The role of PAPP-A in predicting SGA has been studied by other researchers. The findings of some previous studies are summarised in (Table/Fig 8) (9),(14),(17).

Agarwal R et al., studied 284 women to investigate the association of PAPP-A levels in the late first trimester with SGA neonates in a prospective case control study (9). They found that the prevalence of SGA was 14.54%. The found that lower PAPP-A median MoM levels were consistent with SGA. They noted a reasonably high positive predictive value of PAPP-A MoM at ≤5th percentile and opined that PAPP-A may be used as a screening toll for SGA. These findings are in line with the findings of the present study.

Morris RK et al., conducted a meta-analysis of 32 studies including 175,240 pregnancies. They studied various cut-offs of PAPP-A MoM (17). From their results, they derived clinical interpretation that women with first trimester PAPP-A <5th percentile have one in 5.6 chances of SGA baby, and women with, 1st percentile have a one in 3.6 chance of SGA baby. They highlighted the need for future studies to develop robust and accurate predictive models. However, in contrast to the findings of the present study, they found that PAPP-A had poor predictive values.

Hoseini MS et al., conducted a cross-sectional study of 715 pregnant women in which the prevalence of SGA was 14.5% (14). Their study found that the best cut-off of PAPP-A MoM was 0.75 at which the sensitivity was 80.9%, comparable to the present study, and that the specificity was 85%. They concluded that the measurement of serum PAPP-A levels at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation can effectively predict the increased risk of SGA neonates. In the present study, the ROC curve showed an optimum cut-off of 0.665 with a sensitivity of 73.5%, and specificity of 67.6%.

The present study showed, low levels of PAPP-A were found to be significantly associated with preeclampsia with OR 14.16 (95% CI: 5.16-38.89), p-value=0.00001. However, Mula R et al., found that the incidence of preeclampsia in SGA group was 8% (n=4), p-value=0.525 which is in contrast to the findings of the present study (15). Agarwal R et al., found that the sensitivity was 77%, specificity was 95.2% for preeclampsia in <5th percentile of PAPP-A with median of 0.38 (IQR, 0.29-0.51) in the adverse pregnancy outcome group (9).

The present study found a significant association of preterm deliveries with low PAPP-A levels with OR 7.79 (95% CI: 2.23-27.22) p-value=0.001. Gundu S et al., found that PAPP-A <0.4 MoM had a sensitivity of 27.92% for preterm births [OR: 1.84 (95% CI: 1.26-2.68)] (10). Agarwal R et al., found that the sensitivity was 60%, specificity was 94.8% for preterm births in <5th percentile of PAPP-A with median of 0.66 (IQR, 0.56-1.05) in the adverse pregnancy outcome group (9). Both these studies indicate an increased incidence of preterm births in low PAPP-A.

The present study found a significant association of Caesarean deliveries with low PAPP-A levels with OR 2.7 (95% CI: 1.38-5.39) p-value=0.003. Mula R et al., found that the incidence of caesarean deliveries in the SGA group was 36% (n=18), p=0.5 which does not match the present study (15). However, Gupta S et al., found that Caesarean delivery rates were higher in low PAPP-A group compared to controls (20% vs 9%), p-value=0.0017 (18). This finding is comparable to the present study.

The present study also found a significant association of birth of male child with low PAPP-A levels with OR: 2.08 (95% CI: 1.88-4.06) p-value=0.029. Mula R et al., found that the neonatal feminine sex percentage was 32% (n=16), p-value=0.218 in the SGA group (15). Their findings do not match with the present study.

Limitation(s)

This study was limited by a relatively small sample size and the results cannot be generalised to a population.

Conclusion

The present study has demonstrated an inverse relationship between levels of PAPP-A MoM (≤0.49) and SGA. Therefore, PAPP-A MoM can be used as an early screening tool for the prediction of SGA. Research on large populations in varied study settings are needed in order to obtain conclusive evidence on cut-off percentiles and best predicting values.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the contributions of Dr. Kavya Madhyastha, Department of Anaesthesiology, Kodagu Institute of Medical Sciences, Madikeri, Kodagu, Karnataka, India.

References

1.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Investigation and Management of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus. Greentop Guideline NO 31: RCOG; 2014. Published 22/03/2013. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg31/.
2.
Barker DJ. The fetal and infant origins of adult disease. BMJ. 1990;301(6761):1111. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme (FASP) 2016. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/456654 /FASP_programme_handbook_August_2015.pdf.
4.
Kwik M, Morris J. Association between first trimester maternal serum pregnancy associated plasma protein-A and adverse pregnancy outcome. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;43(6):438-42. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Ong CY, Liao AW, Spencer K, Munim S, Nicolaides KH. First trimester maternal serum free beta human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy associated plasma protein A as predictors of pregnancy complications. BJOG. 2000;107(10):1265-70. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Lawrence JB, Oxvig C, Overgaard MT, Sottrup-Jensen L, Gleich GJ, Hays LG, et al. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-dependent IGF binding protein-4 protease secreted by human fibroblasts is pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(6):3149-53. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Dugoff L, Hobbins JC, Malone FD, Porter TF, Luthy D, Comstock CH, et al. First-trimester maternal serum PAPP-A and free-beta subunit human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations and nuchal translucency are associated with obstetric complications: A population-based screening study (the FASTER Trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(4):1446-51. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Krantz D, Goetzl L, Simpson JL, Thom E, Zachary J, Hallahan TW, et al. First Trimester Maternal Serum Biochemistry and Fetal Nuchal Translucency Screening (BUN) Study Group. Association of extreme first-trimester free human chorionic gonadotropin-beta, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, and nuchal translucency with intrauterine growth restriction and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(4):1452-58. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Agarwal R, Kumari R, Mehndiratta M, Radhakrishnan G, Faridi MMA, Chandra N. Pregnancy-Associated plasma protein A levels in late first trimester pregnancies with small-for-gestational age neonates: A prospective case-control study. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2017;67(4):247-52. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Gundu S, Kulkarni M, Gupte S, Gupte A, Gambhir M, Gambhir P. Correlation of first-trimester serum levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A with small-for-gestational-age neonates and preterm births. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;133(2):159-63.[crossref][PubMed]
11.
Patil M, Panchanadikar TM, Wagh G. Variation of papp-a level in the first trimester of pregnancy and its clinical outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(2):116-19. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
World Health Organization. 2000. International Association of Study of Obesity, International Obesity Task Force: The Asia-Pacific Perspective. Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment. www.wpro.who.int/nutrition/documents/Redefining_ obesity/en/.
13.
Pandey VK, Aggarwal P, Kakkar R. Modified BG Prasad Socio economic Classification, Update- 2019. Indian J Community Health. 2019;31(1):150-52. [crossref]
14.
Hoseini MS, Sheibani S, Sheikhvatan M. The evaluating of pregnancy associated plasma protein- A with the likelihood of small for gestational age. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020;63(3):225-30. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Mula R, Meler E, Garcia S, Albaiges G, Serra B, Scazzocchio E, et al. Screening for small-for-gestational age neonates at early third trimester in a high-risk population for pre eclampsia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:563. [crossref]
16.
Robillard PY, Dekker G, Boukerrou M, Le Moullec N, Hulsey TC. Relationship between Pre-pregnancy maternal BMI and optimal weight gain in singleton pregnancies. Heliyon. 2018;4(5):e00615. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Morris RK, Bilagi A, Devani P, Kilby MD. Association of serum PAPP-A levels in first trimester with small for gestational age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37(3):253-65. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Gupta S, Goyal M, Verma D, Sharma A, Bharadwaj N, Kabra M, et al. Adverse pregnancy outcome in patients with low pregnancy associated plasma protein-A: The Indian Experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(7):1003-08.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/55106.16545

Date of Submission: Jan 20, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Feb 01, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Apr 07, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 22, 2022
• Manual Googling: Feb 01, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Apr 06, 2022 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com