Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 111703

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : OC01 - OC05 Full Version

Acute Febrile Illness in Immunocompetent Adults with Special Reference to Neutropaenia: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/55934.16616
Pusala Varun Narayana, Bhumika Vaishnav, S Bharath Gowda, Prasanna Kumar Satpathy, Prashant Gopal, Nimmagadda Nikitha

1. Junior Resident, Department of General Medicine, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor and Head of Unit, Department of General Medicine, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Junior Resident, Department of General Medicine, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 4. Professor (Retd), Department of General Medicine, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 5. Junior Resident, Department of General Medicine, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 6. Junior Resident, Department of General Medicine, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Bhumika Vaishnav,
Department of General Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Sant Tukaram Nagar, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: bhumika.dholakia@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Fever is a common symptom with multifactorial etiologies. In tropical country like India, most of the cases of acute febrile illness are due to seasonal viral diseases and vector-borne infections.

Aim: To know the causes of acute onset fever in immunocompetent adults and to study the prevalence of neutropaenia.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was done on 403 patients presenting with Acute Febrile Illness (AFI) of <14 days duration admitted to a tertiary care hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India from January 2019 to January 2020. Total Leukocyte Count (TLC), Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) and investigations for dengue, malaria, leptospirosis, enteric fever, atypical infections like brucella, rickettsia and relevant body fluid cultures were done. The categorical and continuous variables were expressed as frequency, percentage, and standard deviation.

Results: Out of 403 patients, 214 were males (53.1%) and 189 females (46.9%) with mean age of 28.57±11.26 years. Cause of fever was found in 254 (63%) patients. Dengue fever was the most common cause in 221 (54.8%) followed by Acute Undifferentiated Febrile Illness (AUFI) in 149 (37%). Transient neutropaenia was present in 38.5% cases, mostly with dengue. Only 5.2% patients with AFI required antibiotics.

Conclusion: Dengue fever, the most common cause of AFI chiefly affecting young adults. Neutropaenia in AFI in immunocompetent adult is transient and benign. Antibiotics are not required in majority of the cases of AFI without organ specific aetiologies.

Keywords

Dengue, Fever, Malaria

Fever is a pervasive and ubiquitous theme in human myth, art and science and there are accurate description of febrile patients even in early recorded history. An oral morning temperature of more than 37.2°C (98.9°F) or an evening temperature of greater than 37.7°C (>99.9°F) would define a fever, and occurs with increase in hypothalamic set point. The normal daily temperature variation, also called circadian rhythm, is typically 0.5°C (0.9°F). Axillary temperature is 0.5°C lower than oral temperature (1). The term Acute Undifferentiated Febrile Illness (AUFI) denotes fever of <14 days duration without any evidence of organ or system specific aetiology (2). Acute febrile illness (AFI) in immunocompetent patients may be because of serious bacterial, viral or vector-borne infections like dengue fever, typhoid fever, respiratory tract infection, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), meningitis, leptospirosis, chikungunya, etc (3),(4),(5). In India, vector-borne infections are common causes of acute febrile illnesses.

Neutropaenia is defined as an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) of less than 1500/μL. Mild neutropaenia is ANC of 1000-1500/μL, moderate neutropaenia is ANC of 500-1000/μL and severe neutropaenia is ANC of <500/μL (6). Neutropaenia often accompanies fever, known as febrile neutropaenia. Febrile neutropaenia is common in people on chemotherapy for malignant diseases and other immunosuppressive states (7). Acute transient neutropaenia in an immunocompetent adult is usually defined as an ANC of less than 1500/μL and is usually benign, transient and self-limiting.

Several studies have been done on immunocompetent children and immunocompromised adults with febrile and non febrile neutropaenia to elucidate its aetiology, clinical features and outcomes (8),(9). However, studies on neutropaenia in immunocompetent adults with acute febrile illness are few. In a study with 200 cases of short duration fever, excluding immunocompromised patients, the common cause of fever was unspecified viral fever (45%) followed by dengue fever (26.5%), enteric fever (7%) and UTI (5.5%) (10).

The aim of the current study was to determine the causes of AFI in immunocompetent adults, study the prevalence of neutropaenia in these patients and to assosciate it with the outcome of AFI. AFI in Indian subcontinent is usually due to viral infections and vector-borne diseases. So, the accompanying neutropaenia is transient and self-limiting. This will help the clinicians to avoid advising investigations and treatments to the immunocompetent adults having neutropaenia during AFI.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2019 to January 2020 at tertiary care hospital in Pune, Maharashtra, India. A written informed consent was taken from all the study participants. Institutional Ethics Committee approval was taken prior to the commencement of the study (I.E.S.C./W/81/2022).

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: All patients above the age of 18 years, with fever of <2 weeks duration, without any organ specific etiology were enrolled in the study. (Table/Fig 1) shows the patient selection algorithm. Patients with organ specific and localised source of fever (UTI, pneumonia, meningitis, abscess, etc.), malignancies, post-transplant, patients on chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and on immunosuppressive drugs and patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection (HIV) were excluded from the study.

Procedure

Total 403 patients were included in the study. A detailed clinical history and general physical examination was done for all the study participants. Following investigations were done-White Blood Cell count per micro liter (WBC) by photometry, absolute neutrophil count per micro liter, blood cultures (under aseptic precautions, two 15 mL blood samples were collected from two separate sites at 1 hour interval and inoculated into Bactec specific blood culture and sent to the laboratory), rapid malarial antigen test (by Bi-card method), peripheral blood smear for malarial parasite detection, Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) test for serology of dengue, leptospirosis, chikungunya and typhoid fever (Serum widal test), if fever persist for more than 7 days, tube agglutination method was used. Also urine test for routine and microscopy, liver and renal function tests, Chest X-ray and ultrasound of the abdomen were done.

If no cause of the AFI was found after the above mentioned investigations, the following tests were done for diagnosis of Brucella-tube agglutination test (titre>1:160 was considered positive) and for Rickettsial infections-IgM and IgG antibodies (by using a micro immunofluorescence assay). As this tests were negative, no data was recorded of Brucella and Rickettssia. A final diagnosis of fever aetiology was made using the clinical picture of the patients and a confirmed positive relevant laboratory test.

Patients were defined as having neutropaenia if their ANC <1500/μL anytime during their stay in the hospital. The Complete Blood Count (CBC) was repeated on day 3 and before discharge from the hospital. The patient outcomes were described as discharged, worsened/shifted to ICU and death.

The patients were sub grouped into three groups based on their lowest neutrophil count as

• Mild neutropaenia (1000-1500/μL),
• Moderate neutropaenia (500-1000/μL), and
• Severe neutropaenia (<500/μL) .

Patients were diagnosed to have Acute Undifferentiated Febrile Illness (AUFI), if no cause was identified after the above mentioned investigations.

Statistical Analysis

The data was entered in MS-Excel worksheet and was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 2021-1.0.0.1406. The categorical variables were expressed in terms of frequency and percentage, and continuous variables were expressed in terms of mean ± standard deviation (SD). Chi-square test was applied to study the association between the categorical variables. All the tests were two tailed and p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant at 95% confidence interval.

Results

Out of 403 study participants, 214 were males (53.1%) and 189 were females (46.9%). (Table/Fig 2). The mean age of the study participants was 28.57±11.26 years and the age range was 18-74 years. Majority of study participants were in the age group of 18 to 29 years (59.5%) and among them, 92 (22.8%) patients had neutropaenia. There were 7 patients in the geriatric age group (>60 years of age). Common symptoms on presentation, apart from fever were constitutional (74.44%), dry cough (31.26%), and headache (21.33%).

Total 356 (88.3%) study participants were admitted in the hospital for less than 7 days and 47 (11.7%) study participants for more than 7 days. Total 101 (25%) patients had pre-existing medical illness. Most common pre-existing medical illness in the study participants were thyroid disorders (53.5%).

(Table/Fig 3) shows that dengue fever was the most common cause of acute febrile illness 221 (54.8%) followed by undifferentiated fever 149 (37%), Plasmodium vivax malaria was found in 3% cases. The cause of AFI was identified in 254 of the 403 total participants (63%). The mean stay in the hospital was minimum for patients with undifferentiated fever (3.73±1.72 days), and maximum for patients diagnosed with leptospirosis (8.0±1.66 days) and enteric fever (7.28±1.78 days).

A total of 155 of 403 (38.5%) had neutropaenia during their hospital stay. Out of 155 study participants with neutropaenia, severe neutropaenia was present in 26 (16.77%) patients (Table/Fig 4).

Neutropaenia most commonly occurred in dengue fever (23.1%) followed by undifferentiated fever (13.2%). However, as shown in (Table/Fig 5), when the presence of neutropaenia was compared between the patients with and without dengue fever, it was found that the neutropaenia did not occur with greater frequency in dengue patients (p-value >0.05).

Blood culture was positive in total 13 of 403 (3.2%) patients, 8 patients of Salmonella typhi, 2 patients of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 2 of Escherichia coli and 1 of Streptococcus pyogenes. All the patients with positive blood culture had neutropaenia.

Out of 403 patients, only 21 patients required antibiotics (5.2%) during their hospital stay. All these patients were either diagnosed with enteric fever, leptospirosis or a positive bacterial growth in the blood culture. Among 26 severe neutropaenia patients, 6 (23.1%) had to be shifted to the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) due to unstable and unfavourable hemodynamic and biochemical profile. Sepsis in four and acute kidney injury in two patients were the complications developed with severe neutropaenia. There were no deaths recorded in the study subjects. All the patients were discharged from the hospital and had a favourable outcome including those shifted to the MICU.

Discussion

The current study is one of its kind on immunocompetent adults suffering from AFI to elucidate the causes, the outcomes and to determine the prevalence of neutropaenia. The cause of AFI was identified in 63% cases after the work-up. In a large Indonesian cohort of 1486 patients suffering from acute febrile illness, the cause of fever was identified in 67.5% subjects (11). In a study conducted among 1324 adults with AFI in Kerala, India, the aetiology for the fever was identified in 70.1% subjects (12). (Table/Fig 6) shows comparative analysis of similar studies done on patients of all ages with AFI. This may be due to economic and resource constraints in those countries (13),(14),(15). The higher rate of identification of the cause in the current study can be due to comprehensive blood tests. There was no gender difference in the prevalence of fever. Young adults (18-29 years) commonly suffered from AFI with neutropaenia. AFI can affect any age group, however, serious organ specific, viral and bacterial infections like UTI, bacterial pneumonias are more common in elderly patients (16),(17).

Constitutional symptoms were common with fever in the current study. It was found only in 4.2% patients in an Indonesian study which was in contrast to our findings. The gastrointestinal symptoms like nausea (61.9%) and anorexia (33.4%) were found in their study (7). In a study done in Israel for comparison of aetiological and clinical outcome in febrile vs. non febrile neutropaenia in hospitalised immunocompetent children, bronchiolitis (31 cases) and vomiting (25 cases) were the common symptoms (18). Thus, the accompanying symptoms with AFI may vary depending on the age, geographical distribution, level of immunity and the underlying aetiology.

Dengue was the most common cause of fever, which was similar to the findings of other Asian studies (11),(19). This finding highlights the importance of dengue virus as a causative agent of AFI. Rapid diagnostic strategies, better management protocols and serosurveillance for dengue infections should be undertaken at state and national levels to prevent it from becoming a major public health problem. Dengue infection is endemic in India. The first reported dengue epidemic in India occurred in 1963-64 (20). Since then many Indian states have become endemic where all the serotypes of dengue are prevalent (20). Prevention of dengue involves control the breeding sites of the vector by improving public and household environmental sanitation and water supply, and through sustained modification of human behaviour (21).

AUFI was the second common cause of fever in current study. AUFI is a commonly encountered illness in most of the hospitals. A clinician should be aware of the locally endemic infections to advise appropriate work-up and treatment.

Neutrophils are the first line of defence against the pathogens. Viral infections are a common cause of neutropaenia due to either bone marrow suppression or peripheral destruction (21). Most common causes of neutropaenia in the current study were dengue and AUFI. Clinical observations and experimental data shed light on the possible mechanisms by which dengue virus can suppress bone marrow. The stroma of the bone marrow is found to be infected by dengue virus which then fails to support hematopoiesis and also affects the cytokine production in the bone marrow. Thus, there is a down regulation of hematopoiesis protective mechanism of the microenvironment, causing harm to the marrow stem/progenitor cell compartment during the subsequent process of virus elimination leading to neutropaenia and thrombocytopenia (22).

Most of the researches on neutropaenia have been done on children and immunocompromised adults. In children, the neutropaenia is predominantly due to parasitic, viral and bacterial infections and is usually benign and self-limited. Infections in children may affect one or more cell lines, resulting in transient hematological abnormalities which usually resolve within two months of onset (23),(24). In immunocompromised adults, neutropaenia is usually due to cytotoxic chemotherapy, infections with atypical organisms, immune reactions and bone marrow infiltrative diseases and if left untreated can lead to fatal infections whereas, vector-borne diseases and common bacterial and viral infections are common in immunocompetent patients having AFI (24).

Most of the patients with AFI with neutropaenia were successfully managed in the wards and did not require intensive care. The reason for good outcome may be that most of the viral infections causing fever and neutropaenia are self-limiting and uncomplicated. Early diagnosis, better patient care and immunity in the adult patients prevent the emergence of complications and ensure a good outcome.

In a large study of 2000 hospitalised adult patients with laboratory confirmed dengue infection, it was concluded that prophylactic antibiotics are not indicated in patients with severe neutropaenia (26),(27). Since most of the patients in the current study had viral aetiology of AFI, antibiotics were not required. Thus, all febrile patients may not require antibiotics and should be managed symptomatically initially. There is no role of Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) in immunocompetent patients having AFI with neutropaenia. It is only reserved for immunocompromised patients with neutropaenia (28).

Limitation(s)

Special investigations for the detection of viruses like Adenovirus, Influenza virus, Herpes virus etc., were not done due to financial constraints.

Conclusion

Dengue was the most common cause of AFI affecting patients less than 30 years of age. Neutropaenia was found in more than one third of the patients. It was benign, transient and self-limiting in all the patients with AFI. Most of the patients were treated symptomatically and without antibiotics. Short duration fever cases, without any clinical signs of bacterial infection or hemodynamic compromise, should be managed by acetaminophen, and other symptomatic therapy while awaiting investigations. Diagnosed cases of viral infections do not require antibiotics to prevent the emergence of secondary bacterial infection.

References

1.
Braunwald E, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. In Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 2001. McGraw Hill.
2.
Mittal G, Ahmad S, Agarwal RK, Dhar M, Mittal M, Sharma S. Aetiologies of acute undifferentiated febrile illness in adult patients-an experience from a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. JCDR. 2015;9(12):DC22. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Couch RB, Englund JA. Respiratory viral infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised persons. Am J Med. 1997;102(3):02-09. [crossref]
4.
Diaz A, Zaragoza R, Granada R, Salavert M. Acute viral infections in immunocompetent patients. Medicina Intensiva (English Edition). 2011;35(3):179-85. [crossref]
5.
Corey GR, Stryjewski ME, Everts RJ. Short-course therapy for bloodstream infections in immunocompetent adults. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34:S47-51. [crossref]
6.
Schwartzberg LS. Neutropenia: Etiology and pathogenesis. Clin Cornerstone. 2006;8:S5-11. [crossref]
7.
Punnapuzha S, Edemobi PK, Elmoheen A. Febrile Neutropenia. Can Vet J. 2021;170-74.
8.
Wittmann O, Rimon A, Scolnik D, Glatstein M. Outcomes of immunocompetent children presenting with fever and neutropenia. J Emerg Med. 2018;54(3):315-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Pascual C, Trenchs V, Hernández-Bou S, Català A, Valls AF, Luaces C. Outcomes and infectious etiologies of febrile neutropenia in non-immunocompromised children who present in an emergency department. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(10):1667-72. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Satpathy PK, Wasekar MS, Diggikar PM, Misra RN, Patil A, Zagde P. Clinical, serological, microbiological, and outcome study of 200 cases of short duration fever without prior exposure to antibiotic. Medical Journal of Dr. DY Patil University. 2016;9(1):23. [crossref]
11.
Gasem MH, Kosasih H, Tjitra E, Alisjahbana B, Karyana M, Lokida D. An observational prospective cohort study of the epidemiology of hospitalized patients with acute febrile illness in Indonesia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(1):e0007927. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Andrews MA, Ittyachen AM. Aetiology of acute febrile illness: A multicentre study from the province of Kerala in southern India. Trop Doct. 2018;48(4):322-25. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Mayxay M, Sengvilaipaseuth O, Chanthongthip A, Dubot-Pérès A, Rolain JM, Parola P. Causes of fever in rural southern Laos. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93(3):517. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Ellis RD, Fukuda MM, Mcdaniel P, Welch K, Nisalak A, Murray CK, et al. Causes of fever in adults on the Thai-Myanmar border. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74(1):108-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Kasper MR, Blair PJ, Touch S, Sokhal B, Yasuda CY, Williams M. Infectious etiologies of acute febrile illness among patients seeking health care in south-central Cambodia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86(2):246. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Azwar MK, Setiati S, Rizka A, Fitriana I, Saldi SR, Safitri ED. Clinical Profile of Elderly Patients with COVID-19 hospitalised in Indonesia’s National General Hospital. Acta Medica Indonesiana. 2020;52(3):199.
17.
Ruiz LA, España PP, Gómez A, Bilbao A, Jaca C, Arámburu A, et al. Age-related differences in management and outcomes in hospitalized healthy and well-functioning bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia patients: A cohort study. BMC Geriatrics. 2017;17(1):01-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Leibovitz E, Kapelushnik J, Alsanaa S, Tschernin D, Sergienko R, Leibovitz R, et al. Comparison of the etiologic, microbiologic, clinical and outcome characteristics of febrile vs. non-febrile neutropenia in hospitalized immunocompetent children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(12):2415-2426. Doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03938-0. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(12):2415-26.
20.
Phuong HL, de Vries PJ, Nga TT, Giao PT, Hung LQ, Binh TQ, et al. Dengue as a cause of acute undifferentiated fever in Vietnam. BMC infectious diseases. 2006;6(1):01-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Gupta N, Srivastava S, Jain A, Chaturvedi UC. Dengue in India. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136(3):373.
22.
World Health Organization. Comprehensive guideline for prevention and control of dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever. 1998;11(3). [crossref]
23.
Munshi HG, Montgomery RB. Evidence-based case review: Severe neutropenia: A diagnostic approach. Western Journal of Medicine. 2000;172(4):248. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Alexandropoulou O, Kossiva L, Haliotis F, Giannaki M, Tsolia M, Panagiotou IP, et al. Transient neutropenia in children with febrile illness and associated infectious agents: 2 years’ follow-up. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2013;172(6):811-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
La Russa VF, Innis BL. 11 Mechanisms of dengue virus-induced bone marrow suppression. Baillière’s Clinical Haematology. 1995;8(1):249-70. [crossref]
26.
Ali F, Alsayegh F, Sharma P, Waheedi M, Bayoud T, Alrefai F. White blood cell subpopulation changes and prevalence of neutropenia among Arab diabetic patients attending Dasman Diabetes Institute in Kuwait. PloS one. 2018;13(3):e0193920. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Thein TL, Lye DC, Leo YS, Wong JG, Hao Y, Wilder-Smith A. Severe neutropenia in dengue patients: Prevalence and significance. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90(6):984. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Lieschke GJ, Burgess AW. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(2):99-106. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/55934.16616

Date of Submission: Feb 26, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Mar 26, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Apr 29, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 07, 2022
• Manual Googling: Apr 28, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 11, 2022 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com