Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 47946

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : LC24 - LC29 Full Version

Underweight, Overweight and Anaemia among Persons Aged 60 Years or Older Residing in an Urban Resettlement Colony of Delhi: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/55915.16647
Anil Kumar Goswami, Ramadass Sathiyamoorthy, Mani Kalaivani, Shashi Kant, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta

1. Additional Professor, Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Sri Lakshmi Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, Villianur, Puducherry, India. 3. Scientist-IV, Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. 4. Professor and Head, Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. 5. Professor, Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Gupta,
E-101, Ansari Nagar (East), New Delhi, India.
E-mail: sgupta_91@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Introduction: Nutritional deficiencies are common among elderly person aged 60 years or older. Elderly persons suffer the dual burden of overnutrition and undernutrition. These nutritional disorders can be corrected if diagnosed and managed at the earliest.

Aim: To estimate the prevalence and factors associated with underweight, overweight, obesity and anaemia among elderly persons in an urban resettlement colony of Delhi, India.

Materials and Methods: The present study was a cross-sectional survey in which elderly persons who were residents of Dr. Ambedkar Nagar, an urban resettlement colony in Dakshinpuri Extension of Delhi were recruited. The study period was from December 2019 to March 2020. A pretested semi-structured interview schedule was used to collect socio-demographic details. The anthropometric measurements, namely, height and weight were carried out as per standard practice. Capillary blood haemoglobin level was measured by a digital haemoglobinometer. Chi-square test for distribution and multivariable logistic regression for association were performed.

Results: Data was collected from 959 participants, with a response rate of 91.2%. The prevalence (95%CI) of underweight, overweight and obesity were 15.5% (13.3-18.0), 21.9% (19.3-24.6) and 9.6% (7.7-11.6), respectively. Persons aged 70 years or older and illiterate persons had increased chance of being underweight. Women had increased chance of being overweight or obese. The prevalence of anaemia among participants was 72.1% (95% CI (69.2-74.9), using the cut-off of anaemia as haemoglobin levels <13 gm/dL in men, and <12 gm/dL in women.

Conclusion: The prevalence of underweight, overweight, obesity and anaemia among elderly persons in the study population was high. Community-based measures need to be taken to address them.

Keywords

Body mass index, Elderly, Malnutrition, Prevalence, Thinness

Malnutrition is a significant public health problem among elderly persons in low-and-middle income countries. It is negatively impacted by physiological changes due to ageing (1). In India, various studies report a high prevalence of underweight, overweight and obesity among elderly persons (2),(3),(4),(5). As per the National Census 2011, 8.6% of the population were aged 60 years and above (6). Aged individuals have increased risk for nutritional imbalance (7). A systematic review on risk factors for malnutrition reported that poor appetite, loss of interest in life, eating dependencies, dementia, cognitive decline, excessive polypharmacy, and general decline in physical health were significantly associated with malnutrition [8-10]. Poor economic capacity and abuse of elderly persons were associated with dietary deficiency of nutrients (11).

Anaemia among elderly is often overlooked in routine clinical and laboratory evaluation, as the presenting symptoms are usually fatigue, weakness and exhaustion (12). These symptoms are frequently thought to be associated with physiological changes due to ageing.Anaemia among elderly persons is due to nutritional deficiencies in two-thirds of the cases, which can be corrected easily if diagnosed early (13). Other reasons are anaemia of chronic disease including chronic kidney disease, or underlying malignancy or parasitic infections or unexplained cause (14). Elderly persons that are residents of urban resettlement colonies are more vulnerable to nutritional anaemia (15),(16). Evidence to this effect of nutritional conditions of the elderly persons in urban slums are insufficient. The associated socio-demographic factors with nutritional problems also require a close investigation.

The study was conducted to estimate the prevalence and socio-demographic factors associated with underweight, overweight, obesity, and anaemia among person aged 60 years or older who were residents of Dr. Ambedkar Nagar, an urban resettlement colony in Dakshinpuri Extension of Delhi, India.

Material and Methods

This study was a cross-sectional survey conducted from December 2019 to March 2020. The study site was an urban resettlement colony in Dakshinpuri Extension, Delhi where approximately 2,900 elderly persons resided (17). The ethical approval for the study was accorded by the Institute Ethics Committee (IEC) of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, vide memorandum no. IEC-671/6.09.2019, RP-37/2019. The study was also approved by the Centre for Community Medicine which maintains the computerised Health Management Information System.

Inclusion criteria: Persons aged 60 years and above, and those residing in the study area for atleast six preceding months were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Elderly persons who were unable to comprehend or communicate were excluded from the study.

Demographic details of the population were maintained by healthcare workers in a computerised Health Management Information System.This is an in-house health management system by the Centre for Community Medicine authorities. This consists of basic socio-demographic and health details of all the individuals in the urban filed practice area and this was updated annually. The lowest reported prevalence among the three health problems under investigation was for anaemia (20.6%), and the same was used for calculation of required sample size (18),(19),(20). With the assumed absolute precision of 2.5%, and alpha of 5%, the required sample size was 1,047. An allowance for death and migration (15%), and for non response (5%) from previous experience of conducting research in the study area were made. The resulting required final sample size was 1,308 elderly persons. From the sampling frame, through simple random sampling, 1,308 participants were selected.

Socio-demographic details were collected through a self-developed semi-structured interview schedule. It included their age, education, current occupation, type of family, marital status, and economic dependency. Selected participants were paid a house visit by trained non specialist graduate interviewers. The interviewers were trained in administering the interview schedule, measurement of anthropometry, and haemoglobin estimation. Upto a maximum of three home visits were made to contact the participants. After explaining the purpose and procedure of the study, written informed consent was sought from the participants.

Age of the participant was recorded as stated by the participant or based on any valid document, if available. If the source of personal income or any monetary benefit from the social welfare scheme was perceived to be sufficient to maintain himself/herself, then the participant was classified as economically independent. If the same was considered insufficient, then the participant was considered to be economically partially dependent. An economically dependent participant was a person with no personal income or monetary benefit from any social welfare scheme (21).

The body weight and arm span were measured as per standard practice (22). The formula for calculating Body Mass Index (BMI) was: BMI=Weight (kg)/Arm span (m2). In elderly persons, arm span is considered better than height for calculating body mass height as the progression in age causes gradual loss in height due to degenerative osteoporotic changes in bones and decrease in the disc space (23). The BMI was classified as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥30 kg/m2) as per World Health Organisation (WHO) classification (24).

Haemoglobin was estimated in the capillary blood by using the HemoCue® Hb 201 DM system (HemoCue AB, Sweden). HemoCue® was recommended for point-of-care estimation of haemoglobin, and it was reported to be comparable with other methods of estimation (25). A finger-prick was made and the first two drops of blood was discarded. The subsequent blood drop was collected in a micro-cuvette, and placed in the slot for measurement. The results were available within 80 seconds. The cut-off value of haemoglobin in elderly persons for anaemia was <13 gm/dL in men, and <12 gm/dL in women. Sub-categories of anaemia were as per WHO classification (26). The haemoglobin test results were provided to the participant, and those found anaemic were provided appropriate treatment and referral.

Statistical Analysis

Data collected on paper were scrutinised for completeness and coherence prior to the data entry. Epi Info Version 7.2 (CDC Atlanta Georgia) was used for data entry. The socio-demographic characteristics were reported as proportion or mean. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the association between nutritional status and socio-demographic variables. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Stata software version 12.0 was used for analysis. The statistical tests used were Chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Out of 1,308 elderly persons selected for the study, 87 were dead, and 169 had migrated. Of the remaining 1,052 participants, 75 refused to participate, and 18 were non contactable even after three Two regression models were constructed. In the first model, underweight category was the dependent variable and socio-demographic characteristics were the independent variables (Table/Fig 3). Elderly persons aged ≥70 years had 1.9 (95% CI 1.2-3.0) times increased chance of underweight than 60-64 years in the crude model. In the multivariable model, women had 40% decreased chance of underweight compared to men. Illiterate had 1.7 (95% CI 1.1-2.6) times and ≥70 years had 2.0 (95% CI 1.2-3.3) times increased chance of underweight compared to literate and 60-64 years respectively. All these associations were statistically significant.

In the second model, overweight and obese categories were combined as dependent variable and sociodemographic characteristics as the independent variables (Table/Fig 4). In the crude model, overweight/obese was higher among women; elderly persons aged ≥70 years; illiterates; and economically dependent elderly persons. In the multivariable model, women had four times AOR=4.0, 95% CI 2.6-6.1) increased chance of being overweight/obese. Elderly persons aged ≥70 years had 60% decreased risk (AOR=0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.7) of being overweight/obese. All these associations were statistically significant. No significant association was found for education, current occupation, type of family, marital status and economic dependency.

Of the 959 participants, haemoglobin was measured for 958 (99.9%) participants. The prevalence of anaemia (95% CI) was 72.1% (69.2%-74.9%). The prevalence of mild, moderate and severe anaemia were 26.9%, 37.7% and 7.5%, respectively (Table/Fig 5). The mean±SD of haemoglobin levels among the study participants was 11.1±2.2 g/dL (Table/Fig 6).

Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association of anaemia with socio-demographic and anthropometric variables (Table/Fig 7). None of the socio-demographic or anthropometric variables showed a significant association with anaemia in the crude or multivariable model. There was no significant association between BMI, and anaemia in the crude and multivariable model.

Discussion

The prevalence and socio-demographic factors associated with underweight, overweight/obese, anaemia were estimated among elderly persons residing in an urban resettlement colony of Delhi. This study found that the prevalence of underweight, overweight and obesity were 15.5%, 21.9% and 9.6%, respectively.

In a study by Rajkamal R et al., among elderly population in an urban area of Puducherry, the reported prevalence of overweight and obesity were 41.4% and 4.5%, respectively (2). In their study, religion, occupation, smoking and alcohol consumption were found to be significantly associated with overweight/obesity. In present study, women had four times increased risk being overweight/obesity and elderly persons aged 70 years and above had 40% decreased chance of being overweight/obese.

A community-based cross-sectional study conducted among elderly persons in Chandigarh city by Swami HM et al., found that the prevalence of underweight, overweight and obesity were 14.4%, 33.4% and 7.5%, respectively (3). Their observation that overweight/obesity was higher among women, was similar to present study. A study in the same setting in 2015 reported the prevalence of underweight, overweight and obesity as 20.8%, 19.4% and 6.6%, respectively (4). Elderly women had lower risk of being underweight, which was similar to the findings of present study.

Mathew AC et al., in a study on elderly persons living in urban Coimbatore reported that 19.5% were malnourished, and 24.7% were at risk of malnutrition (5). They found no association of malnutrition with lifestyle, somatic or functional characteristics. Of the total participants, 55.8% were normal for nutritional status using Mini Nutritional Assessment questionnaire.

In present study, the overall prevalence of anaemia was 72.1%. A study conducted by Vadakattu SS et al., among urban elderly persons in Hyderabad, the reported prevalence of anaemia was 20.6%; and it increased with age. The haemoglobin was estimated using Cyanmethemoglobin method (20). In the present study, there was no association between anaemia and age of the participants. In a study by Kant S et al., among adult men of rural Haryana, the prevalence of anaemia among adults aged 60 years and above was 46.8%. They found a positive association with age and chronic diseases. HemoCue® was used in the estimation of haemoglobin (27).

A study conducted by Malhotra VM et al., among elderly persons of rural Nalgonda, Telangana, reported that the prevalence of anaemia among adults aged 50 years and above was 27.8%. The study found a significant association with females, increasing age, non use of footwear, excessive alcohol consumption and history of chronic blood loss. Haemoglobin levels were measured by Sahli’s technique. The low prevalence of anaemia could be due to low sensitivity of the method used for haemoglobin estimation (28).

Agarwalla R et al., Kamrup, Assam reported that the prevalence of anaemia among elderly persons was 45.5%. The study found a significant association with age, gender, calorie intake, type of diet, iron supplementation, and worm infestation. Sahli’s technique was used for the estimation of haemoglobin level (29). A study conducted by Gonmei Z et al., in slums of West Delhi reported that the prevalence of anemia among elderly persons aged 60 years and above was 57.8%. They had estimated the haemoglobin level by direct cyanmethaemoglobin method (30).

Sudarshan BP and Chethan TK conducted a study in rural Puducherry. The reported prevalence of anaemia among elderly persons was 96.0%.They found a significant association with females and dependent elderly persons. Method used for haemoglobin estimation was not mentioned in the study (31). A study conducted in urban slums of Kochi, Kerala by Retnakumar C et al., that reported the prevalence of anaemia among elderly persons was 60.6%, and women had higher chance of having anaemia. HemoCue® was used for the estimation of haemoglobin (15).

Another study conducted by Lamba R et al., in the urban slums of Meerut, Uttar Pradesh reported that the prevalence of anaemia among elderly persons was 49.5%. They found a significant association with lower socio-economic status, unemployed and chronic diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In this study, haemoglobin was estimated using paper chromatography method (sensitivity 56%) using the Haemo Check Rapid Diagnostic Kit. Low prevalence of anaemia in this study could be due to method used for haemoglobin estimation (16).

A study conducted by Gupta A et al., in Nainital, Uttarkhand reported the prevalence of anaemia among elderly persons as 92.1%. Anaemia was significantly associated with females, unemployed, illiterates, participants reporting hyperacidity, those who had not utilised health facility and lower intake of iron and vitamin C. They used cyanmethaemoglobin method for estimation of haemoglobin (32).

A study conducted by Gupta A et al., in Nainital, Uttarkhand reported the prevalence of anaemia among elderly persons as 92.1%. Anaemia was significantly associated with females, unemployed, illiterates, participants reporting hyperacidity, those who had not utilised health facility and lower intake of iron and vitamin C. They used cyanmethaemoglobin method for estimation of haemoglobin (32).

The study design, i.e. cross-sectional community-based survey, and good response rate are some of the strengths of the study. The interviewers were trained in data collection which enhanced the reliability of information. Haemoglobin was measured using the standardised point-of-care test.

Limitation(s)

The limitation is that being a cross-sectional study, temporality of the findings could not be established. Whether the determinants that studied were the precursors/causative agents for the outcome of interest could not be demonstrated beyond doubt.

Conclusion

There was a dual burden of underweight and overweight among the elderly persons residing in this resettlement colony. The prevalence of underweight increased with increasing age. Women had increased risk of being overweight/obese. In addition to the dual burden of malnutrition, the overall prevalence of anaemia among elderly persons was 72.1%. These findings recommend an effective primary care screening and management among elderly persons in urban resettlement areas.

References

1 World Health Organisation. World report on ageing and health. Geneva. WHO: 2015. n 2021 May 21]. 2 Rajkamal R, Singh Z, Stalin P, Muthurajesh E. Prevalence and determinants of overweight and obesity among elderly population in an urban area of Puducherry. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2015;4(3):369-72. [crossref] 3 Swami HM, Bhatia V, Gupta A, Bhatia S. An epidemiological study of obesity among elderly in Chandigarh. Indian J Commun Med. 2005;30(1):11. 4 Goswami A, Nongkynrih B, Kalaivani M, Pandav C. Double burden of malnutrition among elderly population of Delhi. Indian J Commun Health. 2016;28:324-30. 5 Mathew AC, Das D, Sampath S, Vijayakumar M, Ramakrishnan N, Ravishankar SL. Prevalence and correlates of malnutrition among elderly in an urban area in Coimbatore. Indian J Pub Health. 2016;60:112-17. [crossref] [PubMed] 6 Chandramouli, C. (2011) Population Enumeration data (final population) India: Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India. [Accessed on 2021 May 21]. 7 Andrès E, Serraj K, Federici L, Vogel T, Kaltenbach G. Anemia in elderly patients: New insight into an old disorder. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13:519-27. [crossref] [PubMed] 8 Fávaro-Moreira NC, Krausch-Hofmann S, Matthys C, Vereecken C, Vanhauwaert E, Declercq A, et al. Risk factors for malnutrition in older adults: A systematic review of the literature based on longitudinal data 123. Adv Nutr. 2016;7:507-22. [crossref][PubMed] 9 Kushwaha S, Khanna P, Srivastava R, Jain R, Singh T, Kiran T. Estimates of malnutrition and risk of malnutrition among the elderly (≥60 years) in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews. 2020;63:101137. [crossref] [PubMed] 10 Besora-Moreno M, Llauradó E, Tarro L, Solà R. Social and economic factors and malnutrition or the risk of malnutrition in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutrients. 2020;12:E737. [crossref] [PubMed] 11 Krug E, Dahlberg LL, Mercy J, Zwi AB, Lozano R, editors. World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002;360(9339):1083-88. n 2021 Sep 10]. [crossref] [PubMed] 12 Gómez Ramírez S, Remacha Sevilla ÃF, Muñoz Gómez M. Anaemia in the elderly. Med Clin (Barc). 2017;149(11):496-03. [crossref] 13 Tay HS, Soiza RL. Systematic review and meta-analysis: What is the evidence for oral iron supplementation in treating anaemia in elderly people? Drugs Aging. 2015;32:149-58. [crossref] [PubMed] 14 Goodnough LT, Schrier SL. Evaluation and management of anemia in the elderly. Am J Hematol. 2014;89:88-96. [crossref] [PubMed] 15 Retnakumar C, Chacko M, Ramakrishnan D, George LS, Krishnapillai V. Prevalence of anemia and its association with dietary pattern among elderly population of urban slums in Kochi. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(3):1533-37. [crossref] [PubMed] 16 Lamba R, Agarwal A, Rana R, Agarwal V. Prevalence of anemia and its correlates among elderly population of an urban slum in Meerut. Journal of the Indian Academy of Geriatrics. Medknow Publications; 2019;15:109. [crossref] 17 All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 65th Annual Report: 2020-2021 [Internet]. New Delhi: All India Institute of Medical Sciences; 2022 Jan p. 1056. [Accessed on 2022 Apr 28]. Available from: https://www.aiims.edu/images/pdf/annual_ reports/annualreport-e-18-1-22.pdf. 18 Binu J, Harnagle R. A study on the prevalence of overweight and obesity and its influencing factors among rural geriatric population in Kerala. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2014;3(9):284-93. 19 Kalaiselvi S, Arjumand Y, Jayalakshmy R, Gomathi R, Pruthu T, Palanivel C. Prevalence of under-nutrition, associated factors and perceived nutritional status among elderly in a rural area of Puducherry, South India. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016;65:156-60. [crossref] [PubMed] 20 Vadakattu SS, Ponday LR, Nimmathota A, Nagalla B, Kondru DS, Undrajavarapu P, et al. Prevalence of nutritional anemia and hyperhomocysteinemia in urban elderly. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2019;34(3):330-35. [crossref] [PubMed] 21 Goswami AK, Ramadass S, Kalaivani M, Nongkynrih B, Kant S, Gupta SK. Awareness and utilization of social welfare schemes by elderly persons residing in an urban resettlement colony of Delhi. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(3):960-65. [crossref] [PubMed] 22 World Health Organization. Physical Status- the Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry: Report of a WHO expert committee: No. 854. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995. [Accessed on 2021 Jul 24]. 23 Goswami AK, Kalaivani M, Gupta SK, Nongkynrih B, Pandav CS. Relationship between height and arm span of elderly persons in an urban colony of New Delhi. Indian Journal of Public Health. 2018;62:159-62. 24 WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet (London, England). 2004;363(9403):157-63. [crossref] 25 Nkrumah B, Nguah SB, Sarpong N, Dekker D, Idriss A, May J, et al. Hemoglobin estimation by the HemoCue® portable hemoglobin photometer in a resource poor setting. BMC Clinical Pathology. 2011;11:5. [crossref] [PubMed] 26 World Health Organization. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. Accessed n 2021 Oct 6]. 27 Kant S, Kumar R, Malhotra S, Kaur R, Haldar P. Prevalence and determinants of anemia among adult males in a rural area of Haryana, India. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019;9(2):128-34. [crossref] [PubMed] 28 Malhotra VM, Kabra PR, Bhayya S, Malhotra R. Prevalence and correlates of anemia among elderly population of rural Nalgonda: A cross-sectional analytic study. Public Health Review: Int J Public Health Res. 2016;3:168-73. [crossref] 29 Agarwalla R, Saikia A, Parashar M, Pathak R, Islam F. Assessment of prevalence of anemia in and its correlates among community-dwelling elderly of Assam, India: A cross-sectional study. In J Nutr, Pharmacol Neuro Sci. 2016;6(1):23-27. [crossref] 30 Gonmei Z, Dwivedi S, Toteja GS, Singh K, Vikram NK, Bansal PG. Anemia and vitamin B12 deficiency in elderly. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clin Res. 2018;402-04. [crossref] 31 Sudarshan BP, Chethan TK. A study to assess the prevalence of anemia and activities of daily living among elderly population residing in a South Indian rural community. Int J Comm Med Pub Health. 2017;3:437-41. [crossref] 32 Gupta A, Ramakrishnan L, Pandey RM, Sati HC, Khandelwal R, Khenduja P, et al. Risk factors of anemia amongst elderly population living at high-altitude region of India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9:673-82. [crossref] [PubMed] 33 Singh T, Nagesh S, Ray TK. Magnitude and correlates of anemia in elderly women of a resettlement colony of delhi. J Midlife Health. 2018;9:21-25. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/55915.16647

Date of Submission: Feb 25, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Mar 25, 2022
Date of Acceptance: May 10, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi vide
memorandum no. F.8-747/A-747/2019/RS dated 25 October 2019.
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 04, 2022
• Manual Googling: Apr 27, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 20, 2022 (10%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com