Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 80162

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : FC07 - FC09 Full Version

Knowledge regarding Snakebite and its Management among Second Year Nursing Students


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/49817.16588
Rahul Das, Suman Chattopadhyay, Ananya Mandal

1. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Pharmacology, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Suman Chattopadhyay,
Flat G2, Parkend Apartment, 4/1, Rajkumar Chatterjee Road, P.O.-Belgachia-700037, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
E-mail : iamsumanhere@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Snakebite is considered as Neglected Tropical Disease (NTD) by the World Health Organisation (WHO). Nursing personnel are often the first point of contact for snakebite patients and it is imperative that their knowledge about first aid and management is sound and based on standard treatment guidelines.

Aim: To assess the knowledge regarding snakebite and its treatment modalities among second year Nursing students.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 192 students of 2nd Year, Bachelor of Science (BSc). Nursing, from Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital (NRSMC) and ID and BG Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. A set of 10 pretested and validated questions was given to them to be filled anonymously answering only one option for each question. Each of the responses were calculated as one for ‘Yes’ option and zero for ‘No’ or ‘Uncertain’responses. The overall knowledge was considered inadequate, if the score was less than 70% (A score of seven and less). Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.

Results: About 184 (95.84%) students were aware that not all snakes in India are poisonous. However, only 29 (15.10%) were aware of the fact that tourniquet is not a requirement for transport of snakebite patients to referral centers. Among this study population, 121 (63.02%) correctly said that 20 minutes Whole Blood Clotting Time should be performed and 160 (83.33%) correctly said that Adrenaline should be part of the emergency tray during management. Overall, only 89 (46.35%) of the students scored 70% or more and the rest had inadequate knowledge regarding first aid and management of snakebites.

Conclusion: The study showed that the knowledge regarding first aid and management of snakebites among second year BSc Nursing students was inadequate. The study participants were not aware of the standard treatment guidelines of snakebite management and there was a need to adequately sensitise them regarding the same during their course of study.

Keywords

Anti snake venom serum, Envenomation, Snake, Treatment, Whole blood clotting test

The WHO declared snakebite as a NTD (1) and hence, management of snakebite patients and antivenom supply has been declared a global public health emergency (2). Snakebites are responsible for an estimated 100,000 deaths per year (3),(4) with mostly affecting people living in rural communities, children and agricultural workers being mostly at risk (2),(5). According to existing study Indians suffer most from snakebites, with as many as 50,000 snakebites a year, resulting in up to 11,000 deaths (6). In contrast to only 15% venomous snakes throughout the world (450 out of 3000 species), India has 24% venomous snakes (52 out of 216 species). According to the Bureau of Health Intelligence, Govt. of India, 1,85,625 snakebite incidence and 1,064 snakebite deaths were recorded in India in 2016. Among the Indian states, West Bengal reports high snakebite incidences besides Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh and Kerala. As per records of Public Health Branch of Govt. of West Bengal, snakebite incidence and deaths of snakebite cases for the year 2017 were 29,885 and 240 respectively. Over the past few years, there is an increasing trend of both cases and deaths in West Bengal (7).

Anti-snake Venom Serum (AVS) and antibiotics are needed for management of wet snakebites and can lead to higher risks of morbidity and mortality (8). Snakes being natural habitats of rural areas, more than 97% snakebites happen in the rural areas of West Bengal. Though majority of the snakebite cases are due to either non-venomous snakes or dry bites of a venomous snake. It is been found that only 22.19% of the snakebite victims attended the hospitals and only 7.23% snakebite deaths were officially reported in West Bengal. Some variations among incidence of snakebites are seen with seasonal changes the maximum incidence being during monsoons and summer days (9).

The initial support and transport of the patient to the nearest health care facility is very important while managing a case of snakebite. At the same time, snakebite being common for rural population and many of our study population after completion of their course will be posted in the primary health facilities in the rural part of our country where they will be the first line health care provider. So, they should have adequate knowledge regarding snakebite and its management. By conducting similar studies, their knowledge regarding snakebite and its management can be assessed and the assessment will also reveal the unmet need to conduct workshop or seminars to improve their knowledge of the same.

Thus, this study aimed to assess the knowledge and perception of the snakebite management of 2nd year BSc nursing students according to the latest guidelines published by Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of West Bengal, India.

Material and Methods

The questionnaire based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pharmacology at NRS Medical College and Hospital in the month of January 2020 among 192 BSc Nursing students of 2nd year from NRSMCH and ID and BG Hospital, Kolkata of the academic session 2019-2020. The study was exempted by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) being the observational educational study.

Inclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria for this study were 2nd year BSc nursing students of NRSMCH and ID and BG Hospital who were attending classes of Pharmacology, in the department of Pharmacology, NRSMC.

Exclusion criteria: The students who did not give written informed consent were excluded from the study.

After getting the written informed consent from the participants, they were informed in detail about the purpose of the study before providing the questionnaire. After that, all of them were provided a set of 10 pretested and prevalidated questions as hard copy printed paper. The questionnaire was prevalidated by the faculty members from Department of Pharmacology who were not involved in the study and from faculty member from Department Community medicine, NRSMC.The responses for the questions were ‘Yes’, ‘No’ and ‘Uncertain’ and were asked to answer only one option for each question. A score of one was given for each ‘Yes’ response and zero for the ‘No’ response and ‘Uncertain’ response. The total score was calculated with a minimum of zero (0) and maximum ten (10). The overall knowledge was considered inadequate if the score was less than 70% (score of seven and less) and adequate if more than 70% (score of seven and more).

The questionnaire covered knowledge about perception of snakebite, first aid after snakebites and the treatment of snakebite patients including AVS. The questionnaire was based on Training module for management of snakebite published by Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of West Bengal in the year 2018 (9). They were encouraged to fill-up the questionnaire to the best of their knowledge and perception. They were also informed that the responses would be confidential and no identifiers were used in the forms while filling up the questionnaire so that the students were encouraged to answer confidently. The evaluation took place in the Department of Pharmacology, NRSMC where the questionnaire were provided as hardcopies by hand. External assistance from the internet, books or other colleagues was not allowed, and the time limit for the questionnaire was 15 minutes.

Statistical Analysis

Data were collected and entered in MS Excel and further analysis was done using descriptive analysis was done on the collected data which have been shown below in the form of mean and percentage.

Results

All the study participants were female and the mean age of study participants was 20±1.2 years. About 184 (95.83%) were aware that not all snakes in India are poisonous and 136 (70.84%) students were aware that poisonous snakebites occur most commonly during monsoons. However, only 29 (15.10%) were aware of the fact the tourniquet is not a requirement before transport of snakebite patients to referral centres. When assessed about bed side management of a snakebite victim, 121 (63.02%) correctly said that 20 minutes whole Blood Clotting Test is important in management of snakebite patients. Among the students, 156 (81.25%) rightly said that Tetanus toxoid and broad-spectrum antibiotics are to be used in the management of a snakebite patient and 160 (83.33%) correctly said that Adrenaline should be part of the emergency tray while managing a case of snakebite. About 144 (75%) the students knew Fab fragment AVS is the pharmacotherapy of choice to reduce risk of anaphylactic shock but on the other hand only 32 (16.67%) knew that polyvalent AVS is used clinically. The mean score of the students was 5.28. Overall, 89 (46.35%) of the students had adequate knowledge (i.e.scoring of 70% or more) of first aid and management of snakebite (Table/Fig 1).

Discussion

This study was conducted to assess the knowledge and perception of the snakebite management among 2nd year BSc nursing students according to the latest guidelines published by Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of West Bengal, India. It was found that overall, only 89 (46.35%) of the students had adequate knowledge regarding first aid and management of snakebites scoring 70% or more.

In a cross-sectional study among 150 medical students doing their internship conducted in Karnataka, India, by Ali K and Pathak I, it was seen,100% of the students knew that all snakes are not poisonous (10). One observational study done among 302 medical students of Gandaki Medical College, Pokhara, Nepal stated that about 48.34% of the students correctly knew the fact that all snakes found are not poisonous and majority of the snakebite cases are due to either non-venomous snakes or dry bites of a venomous snake (11). Another cross-sectional study conducted among 200 nursing students in Palestine revealed that 57.5% of the participating students correctly knew that all snakebites are not associated with envenomation (12), while 95.84% of present study participants had a wrong knowledge that all snakes found in India are poisonous.

In this study 70.84% of the participants were aware that snakebites seen mostly during monsoon in tropical countries like India while another study published from Karnataka by Ali K and Pathak I, conducted among interns, shows 92% of them believed that snakes bite mostly during monsoons (10).

Study by Ali K and Pathak I stated that 92% of the study participants believed that snakes bite mostly at night (10) whereas among our students, 81.25% answered that usually the poisonous snakes bite during dark.

According to recent guidelines (9), the immediate management of snakebite patient includes the only recommended method ‘RIGHT’, where R stands for reassure the patient, I for immobilize in the same way as a fractured limb, GH stands for get to hospital immediately and T stands for tell the doctor of any systemic symptoms. Application of tourniquet has been rejected worldwide. In a cross-sectional observational study among medical students in Nepal a total of 77.8% responded that tourniquets should be applied around the limb proximal to the bite site, which is not correct (11). In another study by Kharusha IK et al., 74% of the study participants were in favour of application of tourniquet proximal to the bite mark (12). Similar finding was also seen in a study by Sulaiman SS et al., where 73% study participants were in favour of tourniquet application (13). In present study, 82.82% of the study participants opted for tourniquet application for the purpose of transport of snakebite patients to referral centers. Similar result is also seen in the study by Ali K and Pathak I where 100% students said they would tie a tourniquet at the snakebite site (10).

Whole Blood Clotting Time should be performed to assess and diagnose envenomation. Fresh blood about 2-3 mL is kept in a dry test tube left undisturbed at ambient temperature for 20 minutes and then gently the tube is tilted. If the blood is still liquid after 20 min, it is evidence of coagulopathy and confirms that the patient has been bitten by a viper. Cobras or kraits do not cause antihemostatic symptoms (14). When assessed on bed side management, 73.5% of the participants in the study by Sulaiman SS et al., (13) and 73% of the participants in the study by Kharusha IK et al., (12) stated that 20-minute whole blood clotting time should be performed. Compared to this study, only 63.02% of the study population correctly said that 20 minutes whole blood clotting test should be performed.

In the study by Sulaiman SS et al., 70.5% participants and in the study by the Kharusha IK et al., 73% of the study participants were aware about the most common complication of anti-snake venom serum use being anaphylaxis reaction comparing to this study where 83.33% of the study participants were aware about the fact and were in favor to keep injection Adrenaline ready in the side tray to combat such situation.

Because of the fear of hypersensitivity and the fab fragment AVS being less immunogenic, the latest guideline (9) recommends the use of Fab fragment AVS in snakebite patient management. It was noted that 75% of the nursing students knew that Fab fragment AVS is the pharmacotherapy of choice to reduce risk of anaphylactic shock.

When the snakebite is associated with envenomation, the definitive treatment is antivenom therapy and it should be administered as per the guideline (9). Indian Polyvalent AVS is a unique solution to all type of venomous snakebite cases in India as many a times snake species identification is not possible for the attending physician. In a cross-sectional observational study among medical students in Nepal a total of 86.42% knew that envenomation be cured by anti-venom therapy (11). In this study, participants were aware about AVS is used in the management of snakebite patients but, less than one-fifth of the students knew the fact that polyvalent AVS is used clinically.

Once the wound becomes infected, broad spectrum antimicrobial agents like ceftriaxone, amoxycillin clavulanic acids or metronidazole should be used intravenously as per the guideline. Moreover, all patients must be given Tetanus toxoid as a routine (9). In this study, 81.25% participants rightly said that Tetanus toxoid and broad-spectrum antibiotics are to be used in the management of a snakebite patient.

Limitation(s)

This study has potential limitations. Firstly, the sample size was small. Secondly, the socio-economic background and other demographic characteristics of the students was not considered which could have some impression on their general and background knowledge regarding snakebite and its management.

Conclusion

This study shows that the knowledge regarding first aid and management of snakebites among the present study population was somewhat inadequate, particularly regarding the facts that all snakes found are not poisonous, application of tourniquet to be avoided during transport of the patient after snakebite to the nearest hospital and use of polyvalent AVS in the treatment of snakebite patients. It is evident that the students were not aware of the Standard treatment guidelines of snakebite management as per the latest treatment guidelines published by Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of West Bengal (2018).

That is why, they need to be adequately sensitised regarding the same during their course of study. This can be achieved by taking regular classes or conducting seminar or symposium on first aid and management of snakebite at regular intervals.

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to thank all the 2nd year BSc. Nursing students of NRSMC and ID and BG hospital, Kolkata for their participation in the study. Authors would also thank all faculties and non-teaching staffs of the Department of Pharmacology, NRSMC, Kolkata for support.

References

1.
Guidelines for Management of snakebite; 2nd edition, WHO, SEARO Office of South East Asia: 2016. ISBN 978-92-9022-530-0.
2.
World Health Organization (WHO) Rabies and Envenoming - A neglected public health issue. Geneva: WHO; 2007:01-38.
3.
Chippaux JP. Snakebites: Appraisal of the global situation. Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76:515-24.
4.
Kasturiratne A, Wickremasinghe AR, de Silva N, Gunawardena NK, Pathmeswaran A, Premaratna R, et al. The global burden of snakebite: A literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med. 2008;5(11):e218. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Harrison RA, Hargreaves A, Wagstaff SC, Faragher B, Lalloo DG. Snake envenoming: A disease of poverty. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(12):e569. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Mohapatra B, Warrell DA, Suraweera W, Bhatia P, Dhingra N, Jotkar RM, et al. Snakebite mortality in India: A nationally representative mortality survey. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(4):e1018. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Annual Administrative Report 2015-16; Dept. of H and FW, Govt. of West Bengal. Available at: www.wbhealth.gov.in [Last accessed on 10/08/2021].
8.
Mana K, Ghosh R, Gantait K, Saha K, Parua P, Chatterjee U, et al. Incidence and treatment of snakebites in West Bengal, India. Toxicol Rep. 2019;6:239-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Training Module For Management of Snake Bite and Common Poisons, Department of Health and Family Welfare Government of West Bengal. Available at: www.wbhealth.gov.in [Last accessed on 10/08/2021].
10.
Ali K, Pathak I. Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding snakes and snakebite among interns. Indian J Forensic Community Med. 2017;4(4):229-31. [crossref]
11.
Subedi N, Paudel IS, Khadka A, Shrestha U, Mallik VB, Ankur KC. Knowledge of first aid methods and attitude about snake bite among medical students: A cross sectional observational study. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2018; 13:26. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Kharusha IK, Sulaiman SS, Samara AM, Al-Jabi SW, Zyoud SH. Assessment of knowledge about first aid methods, diagnosis, and management of snakebite among nursing students: A cross-sectional study from Palestine. Emerg Med Int. 2020; 2020:8815632. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Sulaiman SS, Kharusha IK, Samara AM, Al-Jabi SW, Zyoud SH. An assessment of medical students’ proficiency in the diagnosis and management of snakebites: A cross-sectional study from Palestine. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2020;15:3. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Benjamin JM, Chippaux JP, Sambo BT, Massougbodji A. Delayed double reading of whole blood clotting test (WBCT) results at 20 and 30 minutes enhances diagnosis and treatment of viper envenomation. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2018;24:14. [crossref] [PubMed]

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/49817.16588

Date of Submission: Apr 08, 2021
Date of Peer Review: May 10, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Apr 12, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 09, 2021
• Manual Googling: Apr 11, 2022
• iThenticate Software: May 19, 2022 (20%)

Etymology: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com