Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 46357

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : ER06 - ER11 Full Version

Atypical Breast Carcinoma- A Series of Six Cases


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51349.16669
Smritiparna Das, Chhanda Das, Rama Saha

1. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Pathology, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Rama Saha,
House No-FD 112, Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700106, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: ramasaha.kolkata@gmail.com

Abstract

Breast cancer comprises 10.4% of all cancer among women world and it the second most common type of cancer. Increased public awareness and screening have led to earlier diagnosis at different stages. Surgical resection can be done earlier and complete cure of the disease can be achieved. As a result survival rates for breast cancer in young women have improved significantly. Six unusual type of breast carcinoma, presented to the Surgery Outpatient Department were referred to Pathology Department for further investigations. Patient age and sex, clinical characteristics of the tumour, the duration of the lesion, the size, radiological investigation, Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC), trucut biopsy and histopathological examination were noted. Immunohistochemical examination also done in all the cases. Out of the six cases of breast carcinoma, one was the mucinous carcinoma of breast, two invasive papillary breast carcinoma, one apocrine carcinoma, one invasive Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma (PLC) of breast and one was fibromatosis like metaplastic carcinoma of breast. All the patients were female except, a 71-year-old male who presented with invasive papillary carcinoma. All the female patients were presented at postmenopausal age group. After careful examination of the cytology and histopathological slides the final diagnosis was made which helped the clinician for further treatment. Rare breast cancers do not differ from other types of breast cancer in their presentation. But they vary by treatment regimens and outcomes. So, proper diagnosis with imaging, FNAC, trucut biopsy and histopathological examination is a combined tool for proper diagnosis and treatment.

Keywords

Histopathology, Immunohistochemistry, Invasive papillary carcinoma, Trucut biopsy

Breast cancer comprises 10.4% of all cancer among women world and it the second most common type of cancer. Data shows in 2004, breast cancer caused near about 519,000 deaths worldwide (1).

Breast cancer is more common in women than in men, due to less amount of fibrofatty tissue. Although males tend to have poor prognosis (2). Cancer develops if the immune system both adaptive and innate is not working properly or the number of cells produced is too much to eliminate. Breast tumour caused by various reasons like-chemical and radiation exposure, advanced age, poor nutrition etc. (3). Increased public awareness and improved screening have led to early diagnosis. Also, survival rates for breast cancer have improved significantly, particularly in women with early and proper diagnosis (4).

The present study describes six cases of rare types of breast carcinoma. This include mucinous carcinoma of breast, two invasive papillary breast carcinoma, one apocrine carcinoma, one invasive Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma (PLC) of breast and the last one was fibromatosis like metaplastic carcinoma of breast. Present case series describes their clinical history and various approach i.e, radiological and invasive {Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC), Trucut biopsy, mastectomy}, histopathological examination and immunohistochemical study.

Case Report

Case 1

A 70-year-old female patient presented at Surgery Outpatient Department with a lump on her left breast. The lump was slow growing since last 7 months and was located in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast. There was no significant past medical history or family history.

On examination the tumour was 3×3 cm in diameter, with irregular borders, without pain and overlying ulceration and was not fixed to the underlying structure or chest wall. No axillary or supraclavicular lymph node was palpable. In bilateral breast ultrasound, both breasts had heterogeneous echotexture. In the left breast, a mass of 3×2 cm in size was present, located in 2 O’clock position at 6.5 cm from the nipple, with irregular borders and heterogeneous internal echoes, non parallel orientation, non circumscribed with spiculated edge. The FNAC smear showed loose cluster of atypical cells with high Nuclear-to-Cytoplasmic (N:C) ratio. The background of the smear was mucinous. The cytomorphology showed mucinous carcinoma of the breast (Table/Fig 1). Core needle biopsy was done for the confirmation of the case. The section showed cluster or sheets of neoplastic cells suspended in abundant extracellular pool of mucin, partitioned by delicate fibrous septa. The clusters varied in size and shape. The histological feature were suggestive of mucinous carcinoma of breast (Table/Fig 2). Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR) and Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor-2 (HER2/neu) status was done which showed ER, PR positivity and HER2/neu negativity. Result of the HER2/neu was confirmed by FISH technique. The surgery was performed. Staging of the tumour was T2N0M0. Hormone based letrozole therapy was given for 5 years. Follow-up was done clinically after every three months and patient was doing well.

Case 2

A 50-year-old female presented to the Surgery Outpatient Department with a mass in the right breast for seven months. It was small initially and was gradually increasing in nature. There was no history of nipple retraction and discharge. The patient had no rise in body temperature and no abnormality detected on general physical examination.

Physical examination revealed 3×3 cm mobile, firm to hard mass in the superior and outer quadrant of the right breast. The FNAC showed moderately cellular smear, loosely cohesive clusters of large, polygonal cells with abundant, basophilic and granular cytoplasm. Cell showed centrally placed nucleus, which is vesicular, moderately pleomorphic and with prominent nucleoli. The cells in clusters showed irregular nuclear border with nuclear overlapping. All the cells were of apocrine type. Background showed necrosis (Table/Fig 3). Later core needle biopsy was done for further confirmation. The section showed a tumour mass composed of cells arranged in nests and sheets. They were round to oval polygonal shaped cells, with granular eosinophilic cytoplasm. Also had prominent nucleoli (Table/Fig 4). The cells showed few mitotic figures. The histological features suggested the diagnosis of apocrine carcinoma (Table/Fig 3). Immunohistochemistry was done by Peroxidase, Anti-Peroxidase (PAP) technique which showed oestrogen and progesterone receptor negative, HER2/neu receptor equivocal. The FISH done and HER2/neu positivity was confirmed. Surgery was done and tumour stage was T3N0M0. Chemotherapy was given followed by radiotherapy to the chest wall and patient was under trastuzumab medication for 12 months. Follow-up was done every 3 monthly and patient was doing well.

Case 3

A 60-year-old female came to Surgery Outpatient Department with complaints of lump in the right breast for the past one year, gradually increasing in size. There was no history of associated pain, nipple discharge, or significant family history.

On systemic examination, there was not any systemic illness. Routine blood and urine tests were within normal limits. On local examination a large, firm to hard, nodular, palpable mass measuring 9×8 cm involving central and outer quadrants noted. No nipple retraction or discharge was observed. No palpable axillary lymph node was found. Gross examination of the excised specimen showed a well- circumscribed, greyish mass measuring 8×7 cm with areas of cystic degeneration and necrosis. Fine needle aspiration smears were highly cellular and showed features of atypical ductal hyperplasia (Table/Fig 5). Core needle biopsy was done which showed a highly cellular tumour comprised of pleomorphic ductal epithelial cells arranged predominantly in papillary pattern with fine fibrovascular core invading into stroma. The papillae were lined by tumour cells with high N:C ratio and hyperchromatic nuclei along with areas of haemorrhage and necrosis. Proliferation of these tumour cells were also seen within the cystic spaces. Ductal carcinoma in-situ component was noted at places. Gross examination of the excised specimen showed a well- circumscribed, greyish mass measuring 8×7 cm with areas of cystic degeneration and necrosis. The overall features were suggestive of invasive papillary carcinoma (Table/Fig 6).

The tumour was ER, PR and HER2/neu strongly positive. Further FISH study was done to confirm the result of HER2/neu positivity. Clinical stage of the patient was T3N0M0. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given followed by surgery. After surgery adjuvant chemotherapy was given followed by radiotherapy. Patient was on trastuzumab for 12 months and letrozole for 5 years. Follow-up was done clinically every 3 monthly and patient was doing well.

Case 4

A 71-year-old male presented with the swelling in the left breast for last 6 months at the Surgery Outpatient Department. The patient was apparently well 6 months ago when he noticed a small swelling in his left breast which was insidious in onset and gradually progressive in nature. No significant past or family history was noted.

On physical examination a firm to hard swelling was palpated on the central quadrant of the left breast measuring approximately 2×2 cm, not associated with any pain, skin changes or nipple discharge. There was no significant swelling in axillae. The opposite breast was absolutely normal looking without any palpable mass. The Ultrasound (USG) of bilateral breast and axillae was done. The left breast showed a 24×26 mm predominantly cystic space occupying lesion with thick hypoechoic internal septations and solid internal components taking internal vascularity of arterial pattern. There was no abnormality noted in the retromammary and axillary lymph node. The USG guided FNAC showed cell rich aspirate with plenty of loosely cohesive clusters as well as dispersed atypical ductal epithelial cells with high N:C ratio and vacuolated cytoplasm. Nucleus was having open chromatin and inconspicuous nucleoli. No bare oval nuclei were identified. Overall cytological features suggestive of Invasive papillary carcinoma of breast (Table/Fig 7).

Trucut biopsy from the left breast showed-ductular and glandular tissue of breast. Focal area showed papillary pattern of arrangement of neoplastic cells. Mild to moderate nuclear atypia present. Myoepithelial cell layer preserved at focal places. Plenty of inflammatory infiltrate noted. The overall features were suggestive of malignancy (Table/Fig 8). Then modified radical mastectomy was done. Grossly, the specimen of left breast measuring 12×10×3 cm with overlying elliptical skin measuring 9.5×5×0.1 cm was excised. On cut section a fibrotic area noted measuring 1.5 cm in maximum diameter situated 2 cm away from deep resection plane. The microscopic section showed a tumour mass composed of papillary structure lined by atypical cells with scanty cytoplasm. Invasion was noted into adjacent stromal tissue. Scattered areas of calcification were also seen. The overall features were suggestive of invasive papillary carcinoma (Modified Bloom Richardson Grade ???) (Table/Fig 9) (1). Immunohistochemistry was done by peroxidase-ant peroxidase technique ER, PR shows negative and HER2/neu receptor shows positive results (Table/Fig 10). Further FISH study was done to confirm the result of HER2/neu positivity. Surgery was done in the patient and tumour stage was T3N1M0. Taxane based chemotherapy given followed by radiotherapy. Follow-up was done clinically 3 monthly and patient was doing well.

Case 5

A 42-year-old female presented with complaint of progressively increasing mass in left breast for last 6 months. She does not report any pain or skin changes. She has not experienced fever, weight loss, headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, or bone pain.

A well-defined palpable mass was noted in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast. No additional abnormalities were appreciated in both breasts. An ultrasound breast revealed a hypoechoic mass with irregular margins measuring 20×13×7 cm. She underwent left modified radical mastectomy. On gross examination left sided breast measured 22×14×8 cm. Overlying elliptical skin measured 15×11×1 cm. On cut open a whitish growth was identified measured 7×6 cm which was 1 cm away from deep resection margin which involved the nipple areola complex and skin (Table/Fig 11). On microscopic examination the section showed a tumour mass composed of neoplastic cells arranged in single cord like fashion diffusely infiltrating into stroma. Individual cells showed scanty cytoplasm, high nuclear pleomorphism, prominent nucleoli. Tumour giant cell identified. The overall features were suggestive of invasive pleomorphic lobular carcinioma of breast (PTNM-T4N1Mx). Modified Bloom Richardson grade-III (Table/Fig 12) (5). Tumour cells present up to subepithelial tissue of nipple. Epideremotropism not identified. Lymphovascular invasion present. Immunohistochemistry was done by peroxidase- anti peroxidase technique. The ER, PR receptor status was negative and HER2/neu was positive. Further FISH study was done to confirm the result of HER2/neu positivity (Table/Fig 13).

Surgery was done in the patient stage was T3N0M0. Taxane based chemotherapy was given followed by radiotherapy. Follow-up was done clinically every 3 monthly and patient was doing well.

Case 6

A 57-year-old female patient attended Surgery Outpatient Department with a history of mass in left breast for 1.5 year. She was apparently well 1.5 years ago. She does not report any pain. She has not experienced fever, weight loss, headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, or bone pain.

On gross examination, whole breast measured 12×8×5 cm and demonstrated an everted nipple. Ultrasonography described it as a large heterogeneously echogenic mass 4.5×3 cm involving all quadrants of the breast with posterior acoustic shadowing with increased vascularity and dilated ducts extending from mass to nipple Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). On gross examination specimen showed a mass measuring about 6 cm in greatest dimension with a cystic cavity near the mass. Haemorrhagic fluid and necrotic debris noted in the cavity. Mass was 1cm away from the skin margin (Table/Fig 14). The microscopic images from the growth proper showed a tumour mass with monomorphic appearance composed of spindle shaped cells. The cells were arranged in a vague whorl pattern and fascicles also. Mild to moderate pleomorphism was noted. Some matrix producing areas were also noted. All margin including deeper margin were free of tumour. The overall features were suggestive of fibromatosis like metaplastic breast carcinoma. Further Immunohistochemistry was done by peroxidase-anti peroxidase technique which showed triple negativity. Further FISH study was done to confirm the result of HER2/neu negativity (Table/Fig 15). Clinical stage of the patient was T4N1M0. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy given followed by surgery. After surgery adjuvant chemotherapy was given followed by radiotherapy. Patient was on trastuzumab for 12 months and letrozole for 6 months. Follow-up was done clinically 3 monthly and patient was doing well.

Discussion

Breast cancer refers to the erratic growth and proliferation of cells that originate in the breast tissue (5). Breast is composed of two types of tissues i.e., glandular tissues and stromal tissues. Glandular tissues composed of the milk-producing glands (lobules) and the ducts (the milk passages) and stromal tissues include fatty and fibrous connective tissues of the breast (6). There are several types of tumours that may develop within different areas of the breast.

The above case series described six cases of rare breast carcinoma. This included mucinous carcinoma of breast, one apocrine carcinoma, two invasive papillary breast carcinoma, one invasive Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma (PLC) of breast and the last one is metaplastic carcinoma of breast with their clinical history and various approach both radiological and invasive (FNAC, trucut biopsy, mastectomy) histopathological examination and immunohistochemical study. These patients were presented first at Surgery Outpatient Department and then referred to the Radiology and Pathology Department for further investigation. All the patients were female except one who was a 71-year-old male presented with invasive papillary carcinoma. All the female patients were presented at postmenopausal age group.

Primary mucinous carcinoma of breast should have mucinous component of at least 90%. Mixed mucinous carcinoma containing a mixture of mucinous and non mucinous components and prognosis better in pure mucinous carcinoma (7). In the present case series it was a PMC.

Apocrine metaplasia characterised by fine granular eosinophilic cytoplasm with apical budding of cytoplasm. Gayatri G et al.,reported an incidence of apocrine carcinoma near about 0.4% and Durham JR et al.,reported 62% (4),(8).

Criteria for the diagnosis of apocrine carcinoma are as follows:

1) Apocrine features consisting of 75% of cells;
2) Large cells with eosinophilic granular cytoplasm;
3) Nucleus to cytoplasmic ratio more;
4) Nucleus large, round to oval and vesicular may be pleomorphic;
5) Sharply defined borders.

Minor and non mandatory criteria include prominent nucleoli in >50% of fields and apical cytoplasmic snouts into luminal spaces. Our case fulfilled all the five criteria (8).

In present series, there were two cases of invasive papillary carcinoma one of which presented in female and the other was in a male patient. The term papillary lesions of the breast encompass a morphologically heterogeneous group of lesions and pose difficulty in differentiating benign from malignant lesions (9). Malignant papillary neoplasms of breast include a number of lesions such as Ductal Carcinoma In-Situ (DCIS) arising in intraductal papilloma, papillary DCIS, encapsulated papillary carcinoma, solid papillary carcinoma, and invasive papillary carcinoma (9).

The aetiology of male breast cancer remains poorly understood, but an imbalance in the oestrogen-testosterone ratio is definitely implicated (10). Histologically, papillary carcinoma is divided into intraductal and intracystic; subdivided into invasive and non-invasive (11). Most important histological criterion for invasion is extension of tumour into breast parenchyma. The prognosis of papillary carcinoma depends on the presence or absence of invasion. Non invasive papillary carcinoma can be regarded as a form of intraductal carcinoma and complete resection cures such patient. Even in patients with nodal metastasis, the prognosis of invasive papillary carcinoma has been reported to be favourable. In the present case series, no testicular/liver disease noted. The tumour infiltration into the breast parenchyma/fat was present (11).

Dixon JM et al., in 1982, first described PLC as a variant of invasive lobular carcinoma which was characterised by a diffuse pattern but without its typical cytologic features. Its more aggressive nature than classical infiltrative lobular carcinoma due to its higher-grade cytologic features, higher incidence of distant metastasis, presence of lymph vascular invasion, and a more advanced stage at presentation (12).

Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast is currently classified in six subtypes, namely:

i) Low-grade Aden squamous carcinoma;
ii) Fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma;
iii) Spindle-cell carcinoma;
iv) Squamous cell carcinoma;
v) Metaplastic carcinoma with heterologous mesenchymal differentiation, and
vi) Mixed metaplastic carcinoma.

The prognosis of patients with MBC depends on its grading and staging and also varies with the subtypes (13). In present case series also no lymph node involvement noted, no epithelial component only stromal component seen.

Conclusion

Careful history, clinical examination, radiology, FNAC, trucut biopsy, gross and histopathological examination done in present case series, helped to definitive diagnosis of various breast carcinomas which will guide the clinician to plan for definite treatment regime for the particular patient. This case series will help the clinician to be aware of these rare variants and of its possible outcome.

Acknowledgement

Authors acknowledge the support and assistance of technical staff to carry out the study.

References

1.
Cancer-Its various types along with causes, symptoms, treatments and stages, in: cancer info guide. 2009. http://www.cancer-info-guide.com/.
2.
Anderson WF, Chu KC, Chang S, Sherman ME. Comparison of age-specific incidence rate patterns for different histopathologic types of breast carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:1128-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Sas-Korczyńska B, Mitus J, Stelmach A, Rys J, Majczyk A. Mucinous breast cancer-clinical characteristics and treatment results in patients treated at the Oncology Centre in Kraków between 1952 and 2002. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2014;18:120-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Gayatri G, Mondita B, Asha B, Vishal A. Study on apocrine carcinoma of breast: Histomorphologic features and immunohistochemical behavior. International Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences. 2012;2(3):190-93.
5.
Khuwaja GA, Abu-Rezq AN. Bimodal breast cancer classification system. Pattern Analysis and Application. 2004;7:235-42. [crossref]
6.
Breast cancer process India, Breast cancer cost India, Breast cancer, Delhi India. Breast cancer information and resources. 2010. Available from: http://www.digforthecure.org/breast-cancer-process-india-breast-cancer-cost-india-breast-cancer-delhi-india.html.
7.
Erhan Y, Ciris M, Zekioglu O, Erhan Y, Kapkac M, Makay O, et al. Do clinical and immunohistochemical findings of pure mucinous breast carcinoma differ from mixed mucinous breast carcinoma? Acta Chir Belg. 2009;109:204-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Durham JR, Fechner RE. The histologic spectrum of apocrine lesions of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;113(suppl 1)(S3):S18. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Mulligan AM, O’Malley FP. Papillary lesions of the breast: A review. Adv Anat Pathol. 2007;14:108-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Kinoshita T, Fukutomi T, Iwamoto E, Takasugi M, Akashi-Tanaka S, Hasegawa T. Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast in a male patient diagnosed by core needle biopsy: A case report. Breast. 2005;14:322-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Misra SP, Misra V, Dwivedi M. Cancer of the breast in a male cirrhotic: Is there an association between the two? Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:380-82.
12.
Dixon JM, Anderson TJ, Page DL, Lee D, Duffy SW. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast. Histopathology. 1982;6:149-61. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Dizdar O, Arslan C, Altundag K. Synchronous ovarian cancer in a patient with pleomorphic lobular breast cancer: A therapeutic dilemma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2010;22(2):153-54. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51349.16669

Date of Submission: Jul 12, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Aug 15, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Feb 25, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 20, 2021
• Manual Googling: Jan 11, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 30, 2022 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com